On 06/09/2009 05:07 AM, Jay Garcia wrote:
> On 09.06.2009 00:28, NoOp wrote:
>
> --- Original Message ---
>
>> Has the "moderator" gone walkabout? Posted a SM 2.0 related screenshot
>> there hours ago & it's yet to show up.
>>
>
> You've just experienced one of the many drawbacks of the way s
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
I've been reading good things here about AdBlock Plus, and I'm running
SeaMonkey 1.1.16, so I suppose I could download and install it, but I've
also read that important improvements will not be made until SM 2 is
finally released.
What's the advice, on this -- should
I've been reading good things here about AdBlock Plus, and I'm running
SeaMonkey 1.1.16, so I suppose I could download and install it, but I've
also read that important improvements will not be made until SM 2 is
finally released.
What's the advice, on this -- should I install now and upgrade
There's a really nice and very simple addon that places an "X" in the
upper right corner of each tab header that can be
used to terminate a tab. I can't find it.
Stan
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://list
stan wrote:
I'm moving to an Acer and also to Vista. I have written my profile from
old system to my external hard disk. Then, installed SM16 to new
machine. Used profile manager and named a new profile. Then figured I
could search for a folder with ".slt" and replace the contents to get my
John wrote:
David Wilkinson wrote:
I'm sure there will be many good things in SM2, but for me the most
important order of business is getting the FireFox 3 rendering engine.
Already there are several sites I use (one in particular) that do not
render well in SM1.x.
Expanding on this question
horst39 wrote:
Is it possible to just test with SM1.1.16 the validity of an email
address without actually bothering the recipient?
If not, is there another program able to do this operation?
Thanks
Horst
There are quite a few websites if it doesn't need to be a program:
http://verify-email.org
Is it possible to just test with SM1.1.16 the validity of an email
address without actually bothering the recipient?
If not, is there another program able to do this operation?
Thanks
Horst
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozi
Broadback wrote:
Martin Feitag wrote:
Broadback wrote:
I am using 1.1.6 with this version and previous the automatic mail read
seems hit and miss. I have 10 email addresses, when I start SM it always
reads some but it seems not others. The same happens on the scheduled
reads, I have found this
Martin Feitag wrote:
Broadback wrote:
I am using 1.1.6 with this version and previous the automatic mail read
seems hit and miss. I have 10 email addresses, when I start SM it always
reads some but it seems not others. The same happens on the scheduled
reads, I have found this out as I expected
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Martin Feitag:
Looks like there is pretty much room for improvements left there ;-)
Sure. Would you like to know how to get the source? O:-)
Hartmut
I doubt that this will be enough. My brain needs another course of "How
to be a great ...-programmer" or similar before
Martin Feitag:
>Looks like there is pretty much room for improvements left there ;-)
Sure. Would you like to know how to get the source? O:-)
Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listi
Broadback wrote:
I am using 1.1.6 with this version and previous the automatic mail read
seems hit and miss. I have 10 email addresses, when I start SM it always
reads some but it seems not others. The same happens on the scheduled
reads, I have found this out as I expected emails (plural) on a
p
David Wilkinson wrote:
2. If I view my messages as plain text, then I *know* that I will not be the
victim of javascript, web bugs, and other HTML trickery.
true, true...
Anyway, hence the desire to have the default display type configurable on a per
server basis. The only explanation for t
David Wilkinson wrote:
I'm sure there will be many good things in SM2, but for me the most
important order of business is getting the FireFox 3 rendering engine.
Already there are several sites I use (one in particular) that do not
render well in SM1.x.
Expanding on this question, I hope that
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Yes, it is, we cannot release a stable SeaMonkey release without a
stable mail/news backend, which we only will have once Thunderbird 3
goes into at least RC phase.
That said, we'll have a first beta of SM2 in the next few weeks, a
second beta a few weeks later and then a
On 09.06.2009 00:28, NoOp wrote:
--- Original Message ---
Has the "moderator" gone walkabout? Posted a SM 2.0 related screenshot
there hours ago & it's yet to show up.
You've just experienced one of the many drawbacks of the way screenshots
are to be posted for public viewing. Your problem
David Wilkinson wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
Doesn't View->Apply Theme date back to the old Mozilla Suite?
It's now called the "Default Theme" but it with new icons for the
buttons. If you want the classic "Classic" then you'll have to look for
a third party theme that does this retro look.
In S
David Wilkinson wrote:
In SM1.x there is Edit->Preferences->Appearance->Themes. This is no
longer there in SM2.
Yes, that kind of thing is now Tools->Add-On Manager->Themes.
Robert Kaiser
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.moz
Philip Chee wrote:
Doesn't View->Apply Theme date back to the old Mozilla Suite?
It's now called the "Default Theme" but it with new icons for the
buttons. If you want the classic "Classic" then you'll have to look for
a third party theme that does this retro look.
In SM1.x there is Edit->Pref
20 matches
Mail list logo
