CONGRATULATIONS, Seamonkey development crew, and contributing community
members. Your extraordinary work is certainly appreciated.
I am proud to be a Seamonkey User.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mo
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
> Miles Fidelman wrote:
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
Methinks google is still the Borg ... Apple the Cardasians (sp?),
and Microsoft looking more and more like the Ferrengei(sp?).
So who is IBM? :-)
A shadow of the former Klingon empire?
I don't know, given what Microsoft, Ap
> Miles Fidelman wrote:
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
Methinks google is still the Borg ... Apple the Cardasians (sp?),
and Microsoft looking more and more like the Ferrengei(sp?).
So who is IBM? :-)
A shadow of the former Klingon empire?
--
Thanks! & 73, KD4E
David Colburn http://kd4e.com
Have an
Ross Simon wrote:
My first post. Please be kind.
I have been using Seamonkey and Mailwasher together for many years with
no problem. Recently Mailwasher upgraded to "Mailwasher Pro 2011". I am
using SM 2.0.1.4. When asking MW to go to the SM mail application after
it has downloaded my Email, it
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
Methinks google is still the Borg ... Apple the Cardasians (sp?),
and Microsoft looking more and more like the Ferrengei(sp?).
So who is IBM? :-)
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. Yogi Berra
My first post. Please be kind.
I have been using Seamonkey and Mailwasher together for many years with
no problem. Recently Mailwasher upgraded to "Mailwasher Pro 2011". I am
using SM 2.0.1.4. When asking MW to go to the SM mail application after
it has downloaded my Email, it can't find it.
Bob Fleischer wrote:
[...]Mac OS 10.4.
Apple: The new Borg.
I understand that she cannot upgrade to SeaMonkey 2.1,
and that there will be no further security fixes to SeaMonkey 2.0.
Besides buying a new computer, what alternatives might there be?
http://distrowatch.com/search.php?architect
Bob Fleischer wrote:
>[...]Mac OS 10.4.
>
Apple: The new Borg.
>I understand that she cannot upgrade to SeaMonkey 2.1,
>and that there will be no further security fixes to SeaMonkey 2.0.
>
>Besides buying a new computer, what alternatives might there be?
>
http://distrowatch.com/search.php?archite
Stan wrote:
TmoWizard wrote:
Stan schrieb:
I can't ignore the message because the SM Add-Ons Manager marked Stumble
3.91 as Disabled when I switched over to SM 2.1 yesterday.
In about:config you must set /extensions.checkCompatibility/ from *true*
to *false* and it works.
Please install the
Antman008 wrote:
How does the release of Firefox 5 effect the SeaMonkey branch?
Are we going to see a 2.1 or 3.0 version soon?
Sorry, that should have read "2.2".
SM 2.2b1 was released today; 2.2 final is expected next week or the week
after. Both are based on the same platform as FF 5 and
SeaMonkey 2.2 Beta 1 is available for free download [1] now in 14
languages and makes a list of new functionality available to a wider
testing audience for the first time. Please note that this pre-release
version is still intended for testers only and might still show some
problems in everyday
Antman008 wrote:
Team,
How does the release of Firefox 5 effect the SeaMonkey branch?
Are we going to see a 2.1 or 3.0 version soon?
Ant.
Sorry, that should have read "2.2".
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
htt
Team,
How does the release of Firefox 5 effect the SeaMonkey branch?
Are we going to see a 2.1 or 3.0 version soon?
Ant.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Philip Chee schrieb:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:28:06 +0200, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ant schrieb:
I saw Firefox v3.6.18 and Thunderbird v3.1.11 were released earlier
today. Will SeaMonkey v2.0.14 be getting any more updates too? I am not
ready for v2.1.x yet.
Probably not, as nobody is working on ba
Bob Fleischer schrieb:
My wife still uses SeaMonkey 2.0.x on a Power PC Mac running Mac OS 10.4.
I understand that she cannot upgrade to SeaMonkey 2.1, and that there
will be no further security fixes to SeaMonkey 2.0.
Besides buying a new computer, what alternatives might there be?
None, nei
Ray_Net wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Paul wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Why this groups is asking me to download 500 headers out of 61911
Its your browser doing that.
You can change its settings to download all of them if you want,
but thats a lot of downloading.
Yes, The 500 is a suggested lim
Philip Chee wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:28:06 +0200, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ant schrieb:
I saw Firefox v3.6.18 and Thunderbird v3.1.11 were released earlier
today. Will SeaMonkey v2.0.14 be getting any more updates too? I am not
ready for v2.1.x yet.
Probably not, as nobody is working on back
MCBastos wrote:
>Advertising Firefox compatibility
>only helps to get dumb browser-sniffing webpages to load correctly.
>
I call those "Web pages constructed by idiots"
but you're a more kind and gentle soul than I am.
>Extension compatibility is an entirely different subject.
>
I'm a one-step-at-
Philip Chee wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:28:06 +0200, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ant schrieb:
I saw Firefox v3.6.18 and Thunderbird v3.1.11 were released earlier
today. Will SeaMonkey v2.0.14 be getting any more updates too? I am not
ready for v2.1.x yet.
Probably not, as nobody is working on back
AlainF wrote:
Seamonkey should use the same version number as the firefox version it's
using. If it's base on Firefox 4 then Seamonkey 4.xx and now with
Firefox 5 then Seamonkey 5.xx.
It's a common misconception that SeaMonkey is based on Firefox. It's
based on the Mozilla platform, which incl
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:28:06 +0200, Robert Kaiser wrote:
> Ant schrieb:
>> I saw Firefox v3.6.18 and Thunderbird v3.1.11 were released earlier
>> today. Will SeaMonkey v2.0.14 be getting any more updates too? I am not
>> ready for v2.1.x yet.
>
> Probably not, as nobody is working on backporting t
I just tried this upgrade but was never asked which profile should be migrated.
The new installation is completely bare, with nothing carried over from 1.1.18.
The official installation instructions may apply just to upgrades from 2.0 to
2.1; they don't provide any special instructions or cau
On 6/22/11 10:19 AM, sean nathan bean wrote:
> MCBastos wrote:
>> Interviewed by CNN on 22/06/2011 01:36, sean nathan bean told the world:
>>> wondering how this will work to get http://www.fbpurity.com/ working in
>>> seamonkey...
>>
>> Not at all. Advertising Firefox compatibility only helps to g
On 6/22/11 9:48 AM, AlainF wrote:
> Seamonkey should use the same version number as the firefox version it's
> using. If it's base on Firefox 4 then Seamonkey 4.xx and now with
> Firefox 5 then Seamonkey 5.xx.
That would break a number of extensions and other add-ons that indicate
maximum SeaMon
My wife still uses SeaMonkey 2.0.x on a Power PC Mac running Mac OS 10.4.
I understand that she cannot upgrade to SeaMonkey 2.1, and that there
will be no further security fixes to SeaMonkey 2.0.
Besides buying a new computer, what alternatives might there be?
Bob
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 22/06/2011 01:36, sean nathan bean told the world:
wondering how this will work to get http://www.fbpurity.com/ working in
seamonkey...
Not at all. Advertising Firefox compatibility only helps to get dumb
browser-sniffing webpages to load correctly. Extens
Seamonkey should use the same version number as the firefox version it's
using. If it's base on Firefox 4 then Seamonkey 4.xx and now with
Firefox 5 then Seamonkey 5.xx.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://
JeffM wrote:
sean nathan bean wrote:
it displays no problem,
but won't let me install the firefox compatible addon...
The version numbers of SeaMonkey
are at least one integer behind Firefox.
If an extension checks for a version number upon installation,
first, you better assure that the versi
Interviewed by CNN on 22/06/2011 01:36, sean nathan bean told the world:
> wondering how this will work to get http://www.fbpurity.com/ working in
> seamonkey...
Not at all. Advertising Firefox compatibility only helps to get dumb
browser-sniffing webpages to load correctly. Extension compatibili
Interviewed by CNN on 22/06/2011 10:08, Daniel told the world:
> Tonight, I started my computer up in its Windows 7 profile, because it
> had been a while since I had gotten the MS updates. It then (before I
> had gotten to the desktop) installed about 12,500 updates of registry
> keys, etc.
>
On 6/22/11 5:50 AM, Ant wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Yesterday, I was messing with a new/clean installation of SM v2.1 in a
> XP Pro. SP2 (IE6) virtual machine at work to see which of my current
> extensions work or not.
>
> I decided to try the latest PrefBar extension first from
> http://prefbar.tuxfami
Rick Merrill wrote:
Paul wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Why this groups is asking me to download 500 headers out of 61911
Its your browser doing that.
You can change its settings to download all of them if you want,
but thats a lot of downloading.
Yes, The 500 is a suggested limit to prevent do
On 6/22/2011 6:28 AM PT, Robert Kaiser typed:
I saw Firefox v3.6.18 and Thunderbird v3.1.11 were released earlier
today. Will SeaMonkey v2.0.14 be getting any more updates too? I am not
ready for v2.1.x yet.
Probably not, as nobody is working on backporting the security fixes to
the Mozilla br
Ant schrieb:
I saw Firefox v3.6.18 and Thunderbird v3.1.11 were released earlier
today. Will SeaMonkey v2.0.14 be getting any more updates too? I am not
ready for v2.1.x yet.
Probably not, as nobody is working on backporting the security fixes to
the Mozilla branch that SeaMonkey 2.0.x is base
Tonight, I started my computer up in its Windows 7 profile, because it
had been a while since I had gotten the MS updates. It then (before I
had gotten to the desktop) installed about 12,500 updates of registry
keys, etc.
Then a re-boot into Win7 again, and I was being offered to install
Real
Hi!
Yesterday, I was messing with a new/clean installation of SM v2.1 in a
XP Pro. SP2 (IE6) virtual machine at work to see which of my current
extensions work or not.
I decided to try the latest PrefBar extension first from
http://prefbar.tuxfamily.org/installation.html, but it kept showing
On 6/21/2011 10:21 PM PT, cyberzen typed:
Check and see if NoSquint is available for 2.1
I'm using NoSquint with 2.1 and it works perfectly.
Are you using
http://downloads.mozdev.org/xsidebar/mods/nosquint-1.93.2.1-mod.xpi
from
http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmisc.html, or a different one
After loading version 2.1, whenever I'm on a web page and select the
BROWSE button to upload a file, the File Upload box defaults to the
Desktop and not to the last selected upload folder.
Is there any way I can correct this, so that the File Upload box will
show the last folder used for uploading
38 matches
Mail list logo