hawker wrote:
On 6/14/2012 5:44 AM, Daniel wrote:
hawker wrote:
Is there a command to re-load an e-mail?
I keep having issues with attachments (mostly larger PDFs for some
reason) that do not fully download and do not open.
They look fine in the web mail interface. I am using MAPI interface to
Jim Taylor wrote, On 15/06/2012 03:15:
Ray_Net wrote:
NoOp wrote, On 14/06/2012 21:35:
On 06/14/2012 09:09 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
NoOp wrote, On 14/06/2012 02:35:
...
You should be able to review the crash reports, if you've submitted
them, in the browser. In the URL box enter: about:crashes
This is what i got on my home page which is:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/start/
Today first occurence
And this page did not tell me which is the current stable release
..grrr.
IS ... Windows 7 professionnal 32 bits SP 1
UNSUPPORTED for SM 2.10
Currently i am using:Build
Charles Siracuse wrote:
I can't seem to get Seamonley to open properly. When I try to open it I
get
partial pages only and constant buffering. I can receive mail when i get the
mail to
open. I can't get any audio from any radio stations-just buffering. If you can
read
this i asssume i
Works here (tested).
Philip Taylor
no...@nonospam.org wrote:
Since I upgraded SeaMonkey from v2.9.1 to v 2.10, I am unable to save
individual messages as .txt files.
When I try to do so, I get the message Unable to save the message.
Please check your file name and try again later.
Ray_Net wrote:
This is what i got on my home page which is:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/start/
Today first occurence
And this page did not tell me which is the current stable release
..grrr.
IS ... Windows 7 professionnal 32 bits SP 1
Why on earth are you still on SP1, Ray;
Philip Taylor would like to retract this message
(he read XP where he should have read 7).
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
This is what i got on my home page which is:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/start/
Today first occurence
And this page did not tell me which is the
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
This is what i got on my home page which is:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/start/
Today first occurrence
And this page did not tell me which is the current stable release
..grrr.
IS ... Windows 7 professionnal 32 bits SP 1
Why on earth are you
Ray_Net wrote:
This is what i got on my home page which is:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/start/
Today first occurence
And this page did not tell me which is the current stable release
..grrr.
IS ... Windows 7 professionnal 32 bits SP 1
UNSUPPORTED for SM 2.10
Ken Rudolph wrote:
I seem to be unable to load http://www.hbogo.com in SeaMonkey. All I
get is a spinning logo and the site never loads. I'm having no
problem accessing that site using Google Chrome. For that matter,
even http://www.hbo.com just shows a white screen in SM, but loads in
Chrome
Jim Taylor wrote:
Ken Rudolph wrote:
I seem to be unable to load http://www.hbogo.com in SeaMonkey. All I
get is a spinning logo and the site never loads. I'm having no
problem accessing that site using Google Chrome. For that matter,
even http://www.hbo.com just shows a white screen in SM,
Ken Rudolph wrote:
I guess I'll just have to revert to Chrome for all web browsing.
Have you tried Firefox? IMO, much better, and more private than Chrome.
You don't want to sell your soul to Google, do you?
--
-bts
-This space for rent, but the price is high
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Ken Rudolph wrote:
I guess I'll just have to revert to Chrome for all web browsing.
Have you tried Firefox? IMO, much better, and more private than Chrome.
You don't want to sell your soul to Google, do you?
I just downloaded Firefox and tried it. #1, it
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Ken Rudolph wrote:
I guess I'll just have to revert to Chrome for all web browsing.
Have you tried Firefox? IMO, much better, and more private than
Chrome. You don't want to sell your soul to Google, do you?
I just downloaded Firefox and
Hi everyone,
I am transitioning from Vista to Windows 7. I've been using Seamonkey
for years now and migrating from XP, Vista, etc quite successfuly.
Overall, Seamonkey browser seems to be working fine. I do not have any
issue.
The problem that I am facing is with the Profile Manager (again
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Ken Rudolph wrote:
I guess I'll just have to revert to Chrome for all web browsing.
Have you tried Firefox? IMO, much better, and more private than
Chrome. You don't want to sell your soul to Google, do you?
Is it possible to go back to SM 2.9 since SM 2.10 isn't working for me
(multiple problems with Flash e-mail composer)? If it is possible,
where can I find it, and should I uninstall SM 2.10 first?
--
Ken Rudolph
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Is it possible to go back to SM 2.9 since SM 2.10 isn't working for me
(multiple problems with Flash e-mail composer)? If it is possible,
where can I find it, and should I uninstall SM 2.10 first?
About the Flash problems. Using YouTube I found a window called Flash
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Is it possible to go back to SM 2.9 since SM 2.10 isn't working for me
(multiple problems with Flash e-mail composer)? If it is possible,
where can I find it, and should I uninstall SM 2.10 first?
About the Flash problems. Using YouTube I found a
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Is it possible to go back to SM 2.9 since SM 2.10 isn't working for me
(multiple problems with Flash e-mail composer)? If it is possible,
where can I find it, and should I uninstall SM 2.10 first?
About the Flash problems. Using
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
I don't even know what to look for.
Any errors or problems that DxDiag reports.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
I don't even know what to look for.
Any errors or problems that DxDiag reports.
Every tab says: no problems found
--
Ken Rudolph
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
no...@nonospam.org wrote:
Since I upgraded SeaMonkey from v2.9.1 to v 2.10, I am unable to save
individual messages as .txt files.
When I try to do so, I get the message Unable to save the message.
Please check your file name and try again later.
(...)
I hope this will be fixed in the next
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Snip
About the Flash problems. Using YouTube I found a window called
Flash Player Settings Manager. It says: ActiveX Version: Not
installed...Plug-in Version: 11.3.300.257. Could it be possible
that what I need is to install an ActiveX Version? If
David Wilkinson wrote:
I tested this card on my Windows 7 x64 desktop machine (using an external card
reader) and got very similar results:
---
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 x64 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Is it possible to go back to SM 2.9 since SM 2.10 isn't working for me
(multiple problems with Flash e-mail composer)? If it is possible,
where can I find it, and should I uninstall SM 2.10 first?
OK, I was desperate. I did a Windows restore back to the point where I
had
In message rpwdnt7vs7gu5ebsnz2dnuvz_gqdn...@mozilla.org, Jim Taylor
n...@likely.com.invalid writes
I think I would uninstall SeaMonkey, uninstall Flash, reinstall
Flash, and then reinstall SeaMonkey.
Wouldn't uninstalling 2.10 and then re-installing lose all bookmarks
passwords etc?
Jim Taylor wrote:
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Snip
About the Flash problems. Using YouTube I found a window called
Flash Player Settings Manager. It says: ActiveX Version: Not
installed...Plug-in Version: 11.3.300.257. Could it be possible
that what I need is to install an ActiveX
David Wilkinson wrote:
David Wilkinson wrote:
I tested this card on my Windows 7 x64 desktop machine (using an
external card
reader) and got very similar results:
---
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 x64 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
On 15/06/12 00:33, MCBastos wrote:
Well, I couldn't reproduce the behavior you describe. It worked
perfectly for me, with no undesired borders at all. Code below:
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd;
html
head
meta
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Is it possible to go back to SM 2.9 since SM 2.10 isn't working for me
(multiple problems with Flash e-mail composer)? If it is possible,
where can I find it, and should I uninstall SM 2.10 first?
OK, I was desperate. I did a Windows restore back to the
Ray_Net wrote:
This is what i got on my home page which is:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/start/
Today first occurence
And this page did not tell me which is the current stable release
...grrr.
IS ... Windows 7 professionnal 32 bits SP 1
UNSUPPORTED for SM 2.10
Currently i
On 06/14/2012 05:12 PM, no...@nonospam.org wrote:
Since I upgraded SeaMonkey from v2.9.1 to v 2.10, I am unable to save
individual messages as .txt files.
When I try to do so, I get the message Unable to save the message.
Please check your file name and try again later.
The exact
Jens Hatlak wrote, On 15/06/2012 20:55:
Ray_Net wrote:
This is what i got on my home page which is:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/start/
Today first occurence
And this page did not tell me which is the current stable release
...grrr.
IS ... Windows 7 professionnal 32 bits SP 1
On 06/15/2012 07:55 AM, Ken Rudolph wrote:
...
I'm allowing all cookies. I can't find JavaScript...but I know that I
never disabled it.
I didn't have this problem with SeaMonkey 2.9. Is it possible to go
back? Would that even help? I'm scared to even try.
Restart with add-on
NoOp wrote:
I like this message when I switch the uri to: Build identifier:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0pre) Gecko/20110406 NOT
Firefox/4.0pre SeaMonkey/2.1b3pre
There are so many web sites that can be fooled by simply changing the UA
string. It can be a sport...
A couple of the
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Jim Taylor wrote:
Ken Rudolph wrote:
I seem to be unable to load http://www.hbogo.com in SeaMonkey. All I
get is a spinning logo and the site never loads. I'm having no
problem accessing that site using Google Chrome. For that matter,
even http://www.hbo.com just shows a
On 6/14/12 7:07 PM, Ken Rudolph wrote:
I seem to be unable to load http://www.hbogo.com in SeaMonkey. All I get
is a spinning logo and the site never loads. I'm having no problem
accessing that site using Google Chrome. For that matter, even
http://www.hbo.com just shows a white screen in
Hi:
When the SM 2.10 mail window is maximized and you click on the double box in the upper right to shrink it a little is
minimizes. Then the only option is to maximize thus filling the screen. How to get SM 2.10 to a sizable window?
--
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
Brooke Clarke wrote:
Hi:
When the SM 2.10 mail window is maximized and you click on the double
box in the upper right to shrink it a little is minimizes. Then the
only option is to maximize thus filling the screen. How to get SM
2.10 to a sizable window?
Does not happen here; reduces to
I see all the posts about problems and troubles with Seamonkey. I am
using 2.0.14 and it does everything I need with no problems. It ain't
broke so I will keep it.
--
G.W. Ross
How do you get holy water?... Boil the
hell out of it!
___
Gerald Ross wrote:
I see all the posts about problems and troubles with Seamonkey. I am
using 2.0.14 and it does everything I need with no problems. It ain't
broke so I will keep it.
I understand your concern, but I have constantly upgraded my version
and have NOT experienced the problems
On 6/15/12 3:24 PM, Brooke Clarke wrote:
Hi:
When the SM 2.10 mail window is maximized and you click on the
double box in the upper right to shrink it a little is
minimizes. Then the only option is to maximize thus filling the
screen. How to get SM 2.10 to a sizable window?
By double box,
Gerald Ross wrote:
I see all the posts about problems and troubles with Seamonkey. I am
using 2.0.14 and it does everything I need with no problems. It ain't
broke so I will keep it.
I did much the same...skipped a lot of them between 2.0.14 and 2.9
because of what I'd been reading, and I
These two files are created when Seamonkey has crashed and a crash
report has been sent to Mozilla developers.
I opened the file with the extension .extra and this is what I could read:
Theme=classic/1.0
StartupTime=1301702970
ServerURL=https://crash-reports.mozilla.com/submit
On 12-06-15 6:35 PM, Gerald Ross wrote:
I see all the posts about problems and troubles with Seamonkey. I am
using 2.0.14 and it does everything I need with no problems. It ain't
broke so I will keep it.
Most SeaMonkey newsgroup subscribers are presumably using the latest
version, which is
Ken Rudolph schrieb:
Is it possible to go back to SM 2.9 since SM 2.10 isn't working for me
(multiple problems with Flash e-mail composer)?
The Flash problems are not caused by the SeaMonkey update, they will
happen in 2.9 as well if you update to the newer Flash version (Adobe is
working
On 6/15/2012 3:35 PM PT, Gerald Ross typed:
I see all the posts about problems and troubles with Seamonkey. I am
using 2.0.14 and it does everything I need with no problems. It ain't
broke so I will keep it.
Ditto for me as well. One day, I will dump it. My extensions, plugins,
etc. still
Interviewed by CNN on 15/06/2012 12:28, Ken Rudolph told the world:
Is it possible to go back to SM 2.9 since SM 2.10 isn't working for me
(multiple problems with Flash e-mail composer)? If it is possible,
where can I find it, and should I uninstall SM 2.10 first?
Apparently Flash 11.3
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ken Rudolph schrieb:
Is it possible to go back to SM 2.9 since SM 2.10 isn't working for me
(multiple problems with Flash e-mail composer)?
The Flash problems are not caused by the SeaMonkey update, they will
happen in 2.9 as well if you update to the newer Flash version
50 matches
Mail list logo
