Phillip Jones wrote:
On occasion I find that after clicking send for a reply or new message
Progress bar still indicates sending and not says Copy finished (a copy
has been copied to my sent folder). can dismiss the window the message
has been copied and I find my post has been sent.
SM2
psuatocobra wrote:
On Nov 12, 2:03 pm, Benoit Renard
Yet RC2 and the final version are identical, so it doesn't sound like it
came from a change in SeaMonkey (as there was none).
Yes that makes sense.
If you want to check out what is going on on the McAfee side, go to
Site Advisor Service
Richard Lane wrote:
Occasionally sm 1.1.9 performs an illegal operation and has to be
closed, when this happens my bookmarks.html file is reduced to 1kb i/o
140kb and the contents lost. Is there a way to preserve the contents of
this file with say a single stroke so that at worst only that
Bush wrote:
Please post in this newsgroup, When a Good working version of seamonkey
2.X is available . 2.0 is real Buggy . It needs to be Marked as BETA
Time for me to go back to 1.1.18
The best attitude you can do is to avoid trying to use a new
version/design ... too earlier.
Phillip Jones wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Bush wrote:
Please post in this newsgroup, When a Good working version of seamonkey
2.X is available . 2.0 is real Buggy . It needs to be Marked as BETA
Time for me to go back to 1.1.18
The best attitude you can do is to avoid trying to use a new
Ant wrote:
On 12/2/2009 7:18 AM PT, question typed:
Is 2.0 a beta ?
No.
But looks like :-)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
S. Beaulieu wrote:
Ray_Net a écrit :
Ant wrote:
On 12/2/2009 7:18 AM PT, question typed:
Is 2.0 a beta ?
No.
But looks like :-)
Why?
Read all the posts in this newsgroup, you will see a *lot* of complains.
Too much complains
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 2/12/2009 23:36, John Boyle told the world:
Phillip Jones wrote:
question wrote:
Is 2.0 a beta ?
At this point official no.
To the newsgroup: But from a USERS standpoint, a definite YES! :-(
Speaking as someone who had *no* problems at all, whose
Robert Kaiser wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/2/2009 8:13 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Of course, 2.0.x updates will come roughly every 6-8 weeks, in sync with
the Firefox 3.5.x updates, the next one is 2.0.1 and scheduled for
December 15 or 16.
Will any bugs pecurliar to SeaMonkey be fixed?
S. Beaulieu wrote:
Phillip Jones a écrit :
Features that people liked that got discontinued—it's definitely
annoying, but it's not a problem or a bug.
It is when people depend upon them.
it's a problem *for them*, but it's not a SeaMonkey problem as the
software acts as it's meant to.
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 2/12/2009 23:36, John Boyle told the world:
Phillip Jones wrote:
question wrote:
Is 2.0 a beta ?
At this point official no.
To the newsgroup: But from a USERS standpoint, a definite YES! :-(
Speaking as someone
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
[snipping the oldest part of the thread]
In version 1 (correct me if there are changes in v.2), I can
explicitly save a message as a draft, and it stays there
indefinitely until I take some explicit action like deleting or
sending it.
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
For the question:
Will any bugs pecurliar to SeaMonkey be fixed? Will any bugs be fixed
other than security bugs? Will any bugs be fixed other than those fixed
in Gecko for Firefox?
The answer is NO only the already fixed in current nightlies
S. Beaulieu wrote:
Ray_Net a écrit :
Therefore, you consider SM2.0 all ok, because you were not affected.
No. I consider SM2.0 OK because it does what it's meant to.
S.
So you consider per exemple that the migration problems are normal ...
and should not be avoided
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
In my opinion, the migration issues are MAJOR ISSUES ...
They are, but 1) they are really hard to get a grip on, as most people
don't repeatedly test them, and being well-reproducible and
well-reproduced is one of the major things to get well-reported
Daniel wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
For the question:
Will any bugs pecurliar to SeaMonkey be fixed? Will any bugs be fixed
other than security bugs? Will any bugs be fixed other than those fixed
in Gecko for Firefox?
The answer is NO only the already fixed
Serge Popper wrote:
When I first installed 2.0 on my Windows, XP, home edition laptop, I
found out that RoboForm does not support Seamonkey 2.0 yet.
I went back to Seamonkey 1.18. Strangely, 2.0, without my doing
anything, keeps replacing 1.18. I went in to Preferences, Advanced and
unchecked
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Bush wrote:
I am back to Ver 1.1.18 and no more Beta problems. I'll try again
after version 2.5 is released
No, you won't. Several people have stated that migration from 1.1.xx to
2.1 and later will not be supported. Jump now or at some late date start
SM configuration
Leonidas Jones wrote:
OBones wrote:
SM2 will import SM1.1.18 profiles just fine.
And after that you have tow independent installations, provided you
installed them in a different folder.
That's what I have here, it works just fine, no need for any third party
tool
Well, 2.0 will import
John wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
You have evidence that installing SM 2.0 had destroyed anything?
Absoultely
That one word doesn't make evidence.
Robert Kaiser
I think that I have stated my case accurately. You all may want to
refuse to believe that the
John wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
John wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
You have evidence that installing SM 2.0 had destroyed anything?
Absoultely
That one word doesn't make evidence.
Robert Kaiser
I think that I have stated my case accurately. You all may want
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/10/2009 4:31 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
Why did you install programs into 'Documents and Settings' ???
Program Files IS the directory where programs must be installed.
Programs certainly don't have to be installed in Program Files.
Why someone would install anything
i am still with SM 1.1.14 ... i have lurked into #testday but here in
belgium, the #testday worked during the night :-).
However, i have reached #testday using my prefered irc-client (named
pirch) and also using chatzilla.
Pirch work only with iso-8859-1.
Chatzilla works with any charset, so we
Ray_Net wrote:
i am still with SM 1.1.14 ... i have lurked into #testday but here in
belgium, the #testday worked during the night :-).
However, i have reached #testday using my prefered irc-client (named
pirch) and also using chatzilla.
Pirch work only with iso-8859-1.
Chatzilla works
Andrea Govoni wrote:
Il 17/12/09 02:15, rolfp ha scritto:
I have seen this, occasionally. Seems more likely when sending a
large (MBs) mail, lots of graphics. Have noticed it happened with a
small mail soon after a large mail triggered it.
Please vote this bug:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
Unlike some other update capabilities, however, you will then no longer
get even a notice about updates. For SeaMonkey itself, updates are
announced in this newsgroup.
You still can manually go into Help Check For Updates... though to
trigger
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/16/2009 11:20 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
Andrea Govoni wrote:
Il 17/12/09 02:15, rolfp ha scritto:
I have seen this, occasionally. Seems more likely when sending a
large (MBs) mail, lots of graphics. Have noticed it happened with a
small mail soon after a large mail
Martin Freitag wrote:
Ray_Net schrieb:
Nobody can help me ?
Is it enough that i post this(as it is now) to bugzilla ?
Looks like you have run an acceptable amount of tests ;-)
regards
May be ... Anyway ... due to the poor of interest of this bug, i believe
that it will never corrected
Martin Freitag wrote:
Ray_Net schrieb:
Martin Freitag wrote:
Ray_Net schrieb:
Nobody can help me ?
Is it enough that i post this(as it is now) to bugzilla ?
Looks like you have run an acceptable amount of tests ;-)
regards
May be ... Anyway ... due to the poor of interest of this bug, i
Daniel wrote:
SCShot wrote:
On Dec 18, 1:10 pm, Jens Hatlakj...@junetz.de wrote:
SCShot wrote:
On Dec 18, 12:23 pm, Jens Hatlakj...@junetz.de wrote:
You need to enter about:config, without the quotes, in a SeaMonkey
browser window, click past the warning, then enter
signon.startup.prompt
Jan Pohunek wrote:
On 19 pro, 03:40, Farelf u...@domain.invalid wrote:
rich904 wrote:
I noticed yesterday and today while in compose a mail message that I
will sometimes freeze up. I happens while I am typing the recipient
address. I cannot exit the application. Have to go to Task Manager to
Farelf wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Jan Pohunek wrote:
On 19 pro, 03:40, Farelf u...@domain.invalid wrote:
rich904 wrote:
I noticed yesterday and today while in compose a mail message that I
will sometimes freeze up. I happens while I am typing the recipient
address. I cannot exit the application
Phillip Jones wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Mike C wrote:
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Wow! I just noticed that the security upgrade to SM 2.0.1 was handled
invisibly behind the scenes without my active participation or even
noticing that it happened (although I think I did check approve
without thinking
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John wrote:
very poor choice--a well designed program would not require that kind of
work.
Fully agreed, and as a volunteer project we like any help we can get to
actually work on improving that design.
That's a good idea,... but what programming knowledge is required
Jens Hatlak wrote:
bobwhiteesq wrote:
I really wish Seamonkey would not push the 2.0.1 version. On one
computer that version locks up my e-mail if I try to add a cc.
As a workaround, try deleting the OE Contacts address book.
If OE did not work well, what would you say if microsoft tell us
Farelf wrote:
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Jens Hatlak wrote:
As a workaround, try deleting the OE Contacts address book.
If OE did not work well, what would you say if microsoft tell us :
As a workaround, try deleting the SM Contacts address book. ???
I would
Ralph wrote:
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sat, 26 Dec 2009 11:26:21 -0700, /Ralph/:
I have found that with version 2.1 (perhaps it happened before but did
I guess you've meant version 2.0.1, but 2.1 snapshots should be the
same.
not notice)when I reply to a message (email or in this group)
Babatunde Gbolade wrote:
I have just done exactly what Bob Fleischer did - deleting one entry
from my address books each and now Seamonkey is working again.
How did you know which one to remove ?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
Martin Freitag wrote:
Szabadi Péter schrieb:
I've had some unsuccessful attempts to upgrade my seamonkey under win xp.
Latest version working is 1.1.18. Later issues simply don't start after
installing, so I had to remove them and reinstall 1.1.18.
Anybody can help me?
Install SM2.0.1 to a
Robert Kaiser wrote:
bdiver wrote:
The seamonkey lock up has happened many times since I upgraded to
2.01, is there is fix or something I'm doing wrong?
See third point in
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.0.1/#issues
Thanks Robert for this usefull link.
The question
Walter wrote:
Running Win XP SP 3 on a Dell Inspiron 1100 laptop. When I shut down I
sometimes get a notice that 840 is not responding and have to click on
shut down. I do not find a description of what program 840 is with a
google search. Running SM 1.1.18 but working on courage to go to
Martin Freitag wrote:
Mark Hansen schrieb:
On 1/3/2010 3:07 AM, Martin Freitag wrote:
Ray_Net schrieb:
Is SM2 not installed by default in another directory than the
installation directory by default of SM1 ?
I might be mistaken but afaik by heart it always suggests the same
\program files
NoOp wrote:
That it not my view. My view is that perhaps you should switch from
Forte Agent, and use SeaMonkey to search all of the threads that have
already discussed this subject nearly into the ground.
Forte Agent permit us to have the posts we want to be always visible -
SM did not permit
chicagofan wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
NoOp wrote:
That it not my view. My view is that perhaps you should switch from
Forte Agent, and use SeaMonkey to search all of the threads that have
already discussed this subject nearly into the ground.
Forte Agent permit us to have the posts we want
Ray_Net wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
NoOp wrote:
That it not my view. My view is that perhaps you should switch from
Forte Agent, and use SeaMonkey to search all of the threads that have
already discussed this subject nearly into the ground.
Forte Agent permit us to have
Could someone tell us in what directory SM2 has been installed.
Question is for windows os, default directory, not the profile.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
OBones wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Could someone tell us in what directory SM2 has been installed.
Question is for windows os, default directory, not the profile.
C:\Program Files\SeaMonkey2
In my WindowsXP with SM1.1.X it is:
C:\Program Files\mozilla.org\SeaMonkey
I find strange that with SM2
Danny Kile wrote:
Danny Kile wrote:
When opening an attached file in an e-mail when the file type is a WMV.
I receive the following error.
There is a problem with the URL or file you are trying to open or play.
If you are trying to open an URL, the URL may not be valid. If you
are trying to
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 7/1/2010 13:19, Ray_Net told the world:
OBones wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Could someone tell us in what directory SM2 has been installed.
Question is for windows os, default directory, not the profile.
C:\Program Files\SeaMonkey2
In my WindowsXP with SM1.1.X
Martin Freitag wrote:
compositor schrieb:
Can it be made possible please?
It's possible already imo:
http://www.viddler.com/explore/commander_keen/videos/17/
regards
This is not working here, i always got a selection from the beginning of
the sentence till the cursor or if attacked by under
Martin Freitag wrote:
Ray_Net schrieb:
Martin Freitag wrote:
compositor schrieb:
Can it be made possible please?
It's possible already imo:
http://www.viddler.com/explore/commander_keen/videos/17/
regards
This is not working here, i always got a selection from the beginning
Robert Kaiser wrote:
YMMV, but in any case, if we would not
have moved to it, SeaMonkey would be dead by now.
Why ?
You will say the same after switching to SM 2.1 ?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Daniel:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Well, try to select 'am' from http://i.am.a.link ;)
Sorry, Hartmut, but your link is invalid, so I cannot go to that website
and select some arbitrary text.
Sure, that is only an example which points to no website. ;)
But I see your
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 9/1/2010 18:57, OldTimer told the world:
The install instruction at the download site (www.chuonthis.com)stated
to save the file to [SeaMonkey] but I don't know which file to use.
1) c:\Documents Settings\sony\Application Data\Mozilla\Seamonkey ?
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:44:31 -0200, MCBastos wrote:
Oh crap, turns out that there IS an even easier way...
Chortle!
Philip Chee has made available a version of Folderpane Tools that will
install directly on Seamonkey with no need of disabling compatibility
check or
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:16:19 +0100, Ray_Net wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
YMMV, but in any case, if we would not
have moved to it, SeaMonkey would be dead by now.
Why ?
The Gecko 1.8 branch was abandoned by the Mozilla Core devs a long, long
time ago. Only security
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:41:01 +0100, /Ray_Net/:
Thanks for this clear answer ... But we don't like to chenge, change and
change again the versions this looks like Linux people compiling
the kernel each month ... may be not this frequency, however we prefer
to use
jim wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:34:14 -0500, Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
jim wrote:
(This is a repost, I got no reply previously. Feel free to ask questions
in case I left something pertinent out.)
How about why you are hijacking this thread about
I am under Windows XP SP3 and i finally have installed SM2.0.2 without
any problem till now :-) except the following.
This is to inform everybody that he should
- First use add/remove program to Remove SM1.
- Then Install SM2 by running the donwloaded SeaMonkey Setup 2.0.2.exe.
I had installed
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
I am under Windows XP SP3 and i finally have installed SM2.0.2 without
any problem till now :-) except the following.
This is to inform everybody that he should
- First use add/remove program to Remove SM1.
- Then Install SM2 by running the donwloaded
SM shows this mail adress n...@hostname.infoin red
and the send action was unsuccessful.
When i prepared this incident report ... i tried to re-send a mail to
the same adress to document the sent-error message .. but the mail was
sent ..grr :-)
So i cannot tell you what was the error.
Martin Freitag wrote:
Leonidas Jones schrieb:
Ray_Net wrote:
Anyway the message i will pass to everybody is:
Don't remove SM1 after installing SM2 ... DO IT BEFORE.
All I can say is that I installed SM 2.0 without removing SM 1.1.18.
BOth currently exist on my XP machine. The StArt menu
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Martin Freitag wrote:
Leonidas Jones schrieb:
Ray_Net wrote:
Anyway the message i will pass to everybody is:
Don't remove SM1 after installing SM2 ... DO IT BEFORE.
All I can say is that I installed SM 2.0 without removing SM 1.1.18.
BOth currently
cyberzen wrote:
Ray_Net a écrit :
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Martin Freitag wrote:
Leonidas Jones schrieb:
Ray_Net wrote:
Anyway the message i will pass to everybody is:
Don't remove SM1 after installing SM2 ... DO IT BEFORE.
All I can say is that I installed SM 2.0 without
With SM1 when Double-click the playfile.wmv attached file cannot play
the file. I used the Right-Click of this attached file then choice
open. And vice-versa.
So with SM1 i was always able to play the playfile.wmv attached file.
Now with SM2 the only way to play this file is to save it on
William Morrison wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
With SM1 when Double-click the playfile.wmv attached file cannot
play the file. I used the Right-Click of this attached file then
choice open. And vice-versa.
So with SM1 i was always able to play the playfile.wmv attached file.
Now with SM2 the only way
Tom Pamin wrote:
Brooke Clarke wrote:
Hi Tom:
Under Tools \ Options \ Applications
the line ending with (image/jpeg) can be set to use either Acrobat or
Acrobat (in Firefox).
It may be you need to set that action.
I don't see a Tools\Options - where are you looking?
may be - under
David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/13/2010 5:39 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
I am under Windows XP SP3 and i finally have installed SM2.0.2 without
any problem till now :-) except the following.
This is to inform everybody that he should
- First use add/remove program to Remove SM1.
- Then Install SM2 by running
David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/17/2010 3:16 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/13/2010 5:39 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
I am under Windows XP SP3 and i finally have installed SM2.0.2 without
any problem till now :-) except the following.
This is to inform everybody that he should
- First use add
I have a link on my desktop to Start SM Browser.
Using it bring me SM Browser with his Home page.
Is it possible to modify a copy of this link in such a way that the
browser start and display a spécific page like:
file:///C:/Program Files/GIMP-2.0/share/gimp/2.0/help/fr/index.html
?
(in case
David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/18/2010 3:26 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
I have a link on my desktop to Start SM Browser.
Using it bring me SM Browser with his Home page.
Is it possible to modify a copy of this link in such a way that the
browser start and display a spécific page like:
file:///C:/Program
Ralph wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
I have a link on my desktop to Start SM Browser.
Using it bring me SM Browser with his Home page.
Is it possible to modify a copy of this link in such a way that the
browser start and display a spécific page like:
file:///C:/Program Files/GIMP-2.0/share/gimp/2.0/help
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Ray_Net:
I have a link on my desktop to Start SM Browser.
Using it bring me SM Browser with his Home page.
Is it possible to modify a copy of this link in such a way that the
browser start and display a spécific page like:
file:///C:/Program Files/GIMP-2.0/share/gimp/2.0
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Ray_Net:
'affe -browser file:///usr/share/gimp/2.0/help/en/index.html'.
Tested
C:\Program Files\SeaMonkey\seamonkey.exe - browser file:///C:/Program
^
There is a space which shouldn't be there. ;)
Files/GIMP-2.0/share
Ralph wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Ralph wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
I have a link on my desktop to Start SM Browser.
Using it bring me SM Browser with his Home page.
Is it possible to modify a copy of this link in such a way that the
browser start and display a spécific page like:
file:///C:/Program
I am under WindowsXP SP3 with SM2.0.2
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100104 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.2
For a newsgroup, i have positionned to Mark As Read
Applying filter when: Checking Mail or Manually Run
Match any of the following:
Ray_Net wrote:
I am under WindowsXP SP3 with SM2.0.2
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100104 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.2
For a newsgroup, i have positionned to Mark As Read
Applying filter when: Checking Mail or Manually Run
Match any
Daniel wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 1/23/2010 2:22 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
I am under WindowsXP SP3 with SM2.0.2
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100104 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.2
For a newsgroup, i
Phillip Jones wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 1/23/2010 5:27 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
That is not true. I use message filters on news groups and do not
have them set for off-line use.
Unless things have improved in SM 2.0 in previous versions filters were
Ray_Net wrote:
I am under WindowsXP SP3 with SM2.0.2
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100104 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.2
For a newsgroup, i have positionned to Mark As Read
Applying filter when: Checking Mail or Manually Run
Match any
I did not know if i am dreaming or not, but i have the impression that:
with SM1.1.18 the mail adress suggestions list when begining to type an
adress was a list beginning with/sorted by last recently used.
Now with SM 2.0.2 it looks like a sort of a strange alphabetic order.
Is a bug already
Ray_Net wrote:
I did not know if i am dreaming or not, but i have the impression that:
with SM1.1.18 the mail adress suggestions list when begining to type an
adress was a list beginning with/sorted by last recently used.
Now with SM 2.0.2 it looks like a sort of a strange alphabetic order
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
I did not know if i am dreaming or not, but i have the impression that:
with SM1.1.18 the mail adress suggestions list when begining to type an
adress was a list beginning with/sorted by last recently used.
Now with SM 2.0.2 it looks like
Phillip Jones wrote:
»Q« wrote:
Innews:7rgdnrrlobixa_nwnz2dnuvz_j6dn...@mozilla.org,
Phillip Jonespjon...@kimbanet.com wrote:
If they want the silly tabs. Fine. If it makes people giddy using
them That's fine as well
Just please keep a way to turn the tab nonsense off. You need to
satisfy all
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Phillip Jones schrieb:
Funny how things change. everyone now has to emulate Internet Explorer
to keep up. (Not necessarily the way it works under the hood.)
Well, one difference is that many people nowdays don't use any desktop
email client any more (either they use
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
...hmmnn...newsgrouping is my biggest reason for wanting an integrated
suite - best way to focus on information exchange with my hobbies.
I fully agree, and a number of other SeaMonkey users probably do as
well, I just wanted to explain why a large number
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
I just read and understand:
So if you have a mailto link viewed in the Seamonkey browser, you can
click on it and it did not opens your non-Seamonkey e-mail client
I can't remember saying that.
Exact, i just asked you ... in other words ... Is it possible
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
I just read and understand:
So if you have a mailto link viewed in the Seamonkey browser, you can
click on it and it did not opens your non-Seamonkey e-mail client
I can't remember saying that.
Exact, i just asked you
S. Beaulieu wrote:
Rich Shepard a écrit :
Strange. I've no idea where to look for the reason since aspell and the
English dictionary are installed and apparently being invoked.
Did you check, under both checked boxes, that English is selected? (I
know it's silly, but I remember at some point
Herrmann Hofer wrote:
George Carden wrote:
But, it doesn't work with V 2.0. Can't even remember where it came
from, but here's the
script for it (Can somebody fix it to work with 2.0?)...
Well, this works for me (formatting may be broken):
!-- SNIP --
html
head
titleExport Seamonkey
George Carden wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Herrmann Hofer wrote:
George Carden wrote:
But, it doesn't work with V 2.0. Can't even remember where it came
from, but here's the
script for it (Can somebody fix it to work with 2.0?)...
Well, this works for me (formatting may be broken):
!-- SNIP
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, Ray_Net wrote:
My experience. I have installed french then i was not happy with my
choice, i uninstall it and install french classic - perfect. But there
is still place where we can specify french instead of french-classic.
Due to the fact
Phillip Jones wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:47:18 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote:
document.write( + login.hostname + \n\n/td\n\ntd align=left\n\n
+ login.username + \n\n/td\n\ntd align=left\n\n +
login.password + \n\n/td\n\n/tr\n);
For this bit you either need to join them
Phillip Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
*First off I have specific purpose for using html in the post. To get
away from the Problem above
*
*type this: *
document.write( + login.hostname +
\n\n/td\n\ntd align=left\n\ +
login.username +
\n\n/td\n\ntd
My problem was because i executed it
from http://home.scarlet.be/~pin10521/showpassword.htm
instead of
from file:///C:/ALLDATA/TEST/showpassword.htm
NOW - for those asking to print it, they have the choice or printing
directly from SM browser, on a printer or on a pdf-pseudo-printer.
I prefer
Phillip Jones wrote:
George Carden wrote:
Evan Davidson wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
George Carden wrote:
The old ways I am aware of for printing a list of passwords from the
Password Manager don't seem to work in SeaMonkey V2.
This link describes what I'd been doing...
seam...@taz.de wrote:
Ray_Net schrieb:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
I did not know if i am dreaming or not, but i have the impression that:
with SM1.1.18 the mail adress suggestions list when begining to type an
adress was a list beginning with/sorted by last recently
Rick Merrill wrote:
Pat Welch wrote:
Hi.
This has gotten to the point I'm going to have to abandon SM 2.x soon. I
never saw this in any 1.x version.
I'm on 32-bit Windows Vista SP2 running on an HP notebook with the AMD
Turion dual-core chip, 3 MB RAM.
After about 8 hours of use, suddenly
Daniel wrote:
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Several times, over the years, I have suggested that there *SHOULD*
be a clickable link as part of the Mail Newsgroup splash screen,
but, sadly, I'm still waiting.
The alteration would have to happen in
chrome://messenger/content/start.xhtml but
Neil Hughes wrote:
On 11/2/10 02:42, Leonidas Jones wrote:
In my cases, the migration did take a long time, could you perhaps be
clicking OK before the migration is finished?
I kept my hands away from the keyboard/mouse during the migration :-) -
I think the OK button is not active during
1 - 100 of 2507 matches
Mail list logo
