Re: WINDOWS 10 UPGRADE WITH SEAMONKEY V 2.33.1

WaltS48 wrote: On 3/21/21 3:18 PM, BER wrote: Hello, Please see my email below. I have decided to upgrade to Windows 10. Will Version 2.33.1 work with Windows 10 and should I be able to upgrade to the latest version of Seamonkey? Thank you Brenda Upgrading has been broken for several

Re: WINDOWS 10 UPGRADE WITH SEAMONKEY V 2.33.1

BER wrote: Hello, Please see my email below. I have decided to upgrade to Windows 10. Will Version 2.33.1 work with Windows 10 and should I be able to upgrade to the latest version of Seamonkey? Thank you Brenda Yes SM suns on W 10. However, starting with Netscape, I have never caused

Re: WINDOWS 10 UPGRADE WITH SEAMONKEY V 2.33.1

On 3/21/21 3:18 PM, BER wrote: Hello, Please see my email below. I have decided to upgrade to Windows 10. Will Version 2.33.1 work with Windows 10 and should I be able to upgrade to the latest version of Seamonkey? Thank you Brenda Upgrading has been broken for several versions so you need

WINDOWS 10 UPGRADE WITH SEAMONKEY V 2.33.1

Hello, Please see my email below. I have decided to upgrade to Windows 10. Will Version 2.33.1 work with Windows 10 and should I be able to upgrade to the latest version of Seamonkey? Thank you Brenda On 2/16/2020 2:38 PM, BER wrote: Hello Everyone, I have been using Seamonkey for a very

Re: SeaMonkey Upgrade 2.39 to 2.53.6

alexyu wrote on 28/02/2021 3:34 pm: Daniel wrote, on 11 Feb 21 02:41: What's the applicable term?? "Buyer Beware!!". ;-) "Caveat emptor" in Latin... I could respond "Smarty pants" ... but you may take unintended offence!! ;-P Just saw this today, sorry. Actually, you would be

Re: SeaMonkey Upgrade 2.39 to 2.53.6

Daniel wrote, on 11 Feb 21 02:41: What's the applicable term?? "Buyer Beware!!". ;-) "Caveat emptor" in Latin... I could respond "Smarty pants" ... but you may take unintended offence!! ;-P Just saw this today, sorry. Actually, you would be right: It was just a moment's impulse, as

Re: SeaMonkey Upgrade 2.39 to 2.53.6

alexyu wrote on 11/2/21 4:44 am: Daniel wrote, on 06 Feb 21 01:23: What's the applicable term?? "Buyer Beware!!". ;-) "Caveat emptor" in Latin... I could respond "Smarty pants" ... but you may take unintended offence!! ;-P -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;

Re: SeaMonkey Upgrade 2.39 to 2.53.6

Daniel wrote, on 06 Feb 21 01:23: What's the applicable term?? "Buyer Beware!!". ;-) "Caveat emptor" in Latin... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey Upgrade 2.39 to 2.53.6

. Thank you for the responses in this matter. Danny, Check carefully the upgrade/install instructions in the Release Notes: https://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.53.6/ In particular, "If you are on an older release we suggest upgrading to SeaMonkey 2.49.5 first." L

Re: SeaMonkey Upgrade 2.39 to 2.53.6

oretically (and practically) possible.  BUT NOT IF YOU HAVE A MASTER PASSWORD. He's also having problems with Lightning. The upgrade instructions say that you can't fall back from a 2.53.x to a 2.49.x but Daniel is doing just that, regularly.  No way am I going to try it. Doing something like that *m

Re: SeaMonkey Upgrade 2.39 to 2.53.6

F YOU HAVE A MASTER PASSWORD. He's also having problems with Lightning. The upgrade instructions say that you can't fall back from a 2.53.x to a 2.49.x but Daniel is doing just that, regularly.  No way am I going to try it. Doing something like that *might* work (or not), it's just that there's n

Re: SeaMonkey Upgrade 2.39 to 2.53.6

and 2.53.6. Not something I'd ever want to do, but it shows that it is theoretically (and practically) possible. BUT NOT IF YOU HAVE A MASTER PASSWORD. He's also having problems with Lightning. The upgrade instructions say that you can't fall back from a 2.53.x to a 2.49.x but Daniel is

Re: SeaMonkey Upgrade 2.39 to 2.53.6

Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote: Looking at https://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#old_unofficial I'd say things are not as bad as they look.  The releases after 2.39 were: 2.40, 2.46, 2.48, 2.49.x and 2.53.x. Lemuel Johnson points out that the current release notes suggest installing

Re: SeaMonkey Upgrade 2.39 to 2.53.6

Danny Kile wrote: My wife's PC has not been upgraded in awhile she is running SM ver. 2.39 on Windows 8. Can in install SM 2.53.6 directly or should install an intermediate version first? I will backup before installing, like I always do on my PC. Thank you for the responses in this matter.

Re: SeaMonkey Upgrade 2.39 to 2.53.6

for the responses in this matter. Danny, Check carefully the upgrade/install instructions in the Release Notes: https://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.53.6/ In particular, "If you are on an older release we suggest upgrading to SeaMonkey 2.49.5 first." L

SeaMonkey Upgrade 2.39 to 2.53.6

My wife's PC has not been upgraded in awhile she is running SM ver. 2.39 on Windows 8. Can in install SM 2.53.6 directly or should install an intermediate version first? I will backup before installing, like I always do on my PC. Thank you for the responses in this matter. Danny,

Re: Weird, minor issue since upgrade to 2.53.5.1

On 1/3/2021 2:04 PM, Rick & Sharon wrote: Been loving Mozilla since the NetScape days, current install info: User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.5.1 Build identifier: 20201115194905 Upgraded several different home PCs/laptops

Re: Weird, minor issue since upgrade to 2.53.5.1

Rick & Sharon wrote on 04/01/21 07:04: Been loving Mozilla since the NetScape days, current install info: User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.5.1 Build identifier: 20201115194905 Upgraded several different home PCs/laptops to

Weird, minor issue since upgrade to 2.53.5.1

Been loving Mozilla since the NetScape days, current install info: User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.5.1 Build identifier: 20201115194905 Upgraded several different home PCs/laptops to newest version, but on this machine

[regression] 2.53.1 web.whatsapp.com ask to upgrade to 52+ 2.53.1b OK

Same profile same agent override 2.53.1b OK 2.53.1 WA ask to update to firefox 52+ Giulia ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Sites Ask To Upgrade Browser

Rob Steinmetz wrote on 22/11/2019 4:27 AM: Daniel wrote: Rob Steinmetz wrote on 21/11/2019 5:34 AM: Lemuel Johnson wrote: On 11/5/2019 5:04 AM, Thomas Pamin wrote: I'm getting a lot more messages on web sites than I used to to upgrade my browser. My general.useragent.override string

Re: Sites Ask To Upgrade Browser

Daniel wrote: Rob Steinmetz wrote on 21/11/2019 5:34 AM: Lemuel Johnson wrote: On 11/5/2019 5:04 AM, Thomas Pamin wrote: I'm getting a lot more messages on web sites than I used to to upgrade my browser. My general.useragent.override string is: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:59.0

Re: Sites Ask To Upgrade Browser

Rob Steinmetz wrote on 21/11/2019 5:34 AM: Lemuel Johnson wrote: On 11/5/2019 5:04 AM, Thomas Pamin wrote: I'm getting a lot more messages on web sites than I used to to upgrade my browser. My general.useragent.override string is: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:59.0) Gecko/20100101

Re: Sites Ask To Upgrade Browser

On 11/12/2019 10:06 AM, Danny Kile wrote: > Hartmut Figge wrote: >> David E. Ross: >> >>> Only one Web site that I frequently visit will not work with SeaMonkey: >>> . >> >> What does not work? Opening the above link

Re: Sites Ask To Upgrade Browser

Hartmut Figge wrote: David E. Ross: Only one Web site that I frequently visit will not work with SeaMonkey: . What does not work? Opening the above link with my 2.53.1 succeeds. Hartmut No problem opening this

Re: Sites Ask To Upgrade Browser

On 11/5/2019 3:37 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: > David E. Ross: > >> . >> There, I enter my real name and my valid E-mail address. > > Not going to happen. But I used Anton Emil and me@localhost. :) > >> I then select

Re: Sites Ask To Upgrade...works with 2.49.5

Hartmut Figge wrote: David E. Ross: Only one Web site that I frequently visit will not work with SeaMonkey: . What does not work? Opening the above link with my 2.53.1 succeeds. Hartmut Works for me with 2.49.5

Re: Sites Ask To Upgrade Browser

Hartmut Figge wrote: David E. Ross: . There, I enter my real name and my valid E-mail address. Not going to happen. But I used Anton Emil and me@localhost. :) I then select "GET IT NOW". Nothing happens.

Re: Sites Ask To Upgrade Browser

David E. Ross: >. > There, I enter my real name and my valid E-mail address. Not going to happen. But I used Anton Emil and me@localhost. :) > I then select "GET IT NOW". Nothing happens. Same here. But there is

Re: Sites Ask To Upgrade Browser

On 11/5/2019 12:11 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: > David E. Ross: > >> Only one Web site that I frequently visit will not work with SeaMonkey: >> . > > What does not work? Opening the above link with my 2.53.1 succeeds. >

Re: Sites Ask To Upgrade Browser

Lemuel Johnson wrote: Firefox is now at 70, there's no point in advertising any version older than that. Actually, if you account for Firefox ESR, advertising 68.0 will be valid until the next ESR cycle begins. I don't have the exact details in hand, but from my observation of previous

Re: Sites Ask To Upgrade Browser

Hartmut Figge wrote on 11/5/19 9:11 PM: David E. Ross: Only one Web site that I frequently visit will not work with SeaMonkey: . What does not work? Opening the above link with my 2.53.1 succeeds. Hartmut It

Re: Sites Ask To Upgrade Browser

David E. Ross: >Only one Web site that I frequently visit will not work with SeaMonkey: >. What does not work? Opening the above link with my 2.53.1 succeeds. Hartmut ___

Re: Sites Ask To Upgrade Browser

On 11/5/2019 8:39 AM, Ray_Net wrote: > Thomas Pamin wrote on 05-11-19 12:04: >> I'm getting a lot more messages on web sites than I used to to upgrade >> my browser. My general.useragent.override string is: Mozilla/5.0 >> (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:59.0) Gecko/20100101 Fi

Request received: Re: Sites Ask To Upgrade Browser ref:_00DU0Lfqj._5001v18w6eo:ref

Hello , Thanks for your email. We have received your request 03627880 and it is being processed by our Support team. To leave additional comments, please reply to this email. Best, TheFork team TheFork, a TripAdvisor Company ___ support-seamonkey

Re: Sites Ask To Upgrade Browser

On 11/5/2019 5:04 AM, Thomas Pamin wrote: I'm getting a lot more messages on web sites than I used to to upgrade my browser. My general.useragent.override string is: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:59.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/59.0 Can I change this so I get less nags to upgrade

Re: Sites Ask To Upgrade Browser

Thomas Pamin wrote: I'm getting a lot more messages on web sites than I used to to upgrade my browser. My general.useragent.override string is: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:59.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/59.0 Can I change this so I get less nags to upgrade? If you're already using

Re: Sites Ask To Upgrade Browser

Thomas Pamin wrote on 05-11-19 12:04: I'm getting a lot more messages on web sites than I used to to upgrade my browser. My general.useragent.override string is: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:59.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/59.0 Try 70.0 which is the latest. But if you mimic other

Re: Sites Ask To Upgrade Browser

On 11/5/2019 3:04 AM, Thomas Pamin wrote: > I'm getting a lot more messages on web sites than I used to to upgrade > my browser. My general.useragent.override string is: Mozilla/5.0 > (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:59.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/59.0 > > Can I change this so

Re: Sites Ask To Upgrade Browser

Hi, Thomas Pamin a tapoté le 05/11/2019 12:04: > I'm getting a lot more messages on web sites than I used to to upgrade > my browser. My general.useragent.override string is: Mozilla/5.0 > (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:59.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/59.0 > > Can I change this so

Sites Ask To Upgrade Browser

I'm getting a lot more messages on web sites than I used to to upgrade my browser. My general.useragent.override string is: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:59.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/59.0 Can I change this so I get less nags to upgrade

Re: Don't upgrade to macOS 10.15 when it is released

I just read https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2019-09-29. It says "... There seems to be a bug in masOS 10.15. bug 1578075 which provides a workaround has been fixed for 2.53. We might need to do a 2.49.6 release if the final macOS version still causes problems with 2.49.5."

Re: Don't upgrade to macOS 10.15 when it is released

It's always a good idea NOT to upgrade to the newest major versions right away like iOS v13 and other softwares. Things can break like this. Always wait until they work out the bugs. If you really must upgrade and can't wait, then be warned of possible issues and make back ups before doing

Don't upgrade to macOS 10.15 when it is released

There is a high chance that 2.49.5 will not work reliably with 10.15. I am already seeing crashes from people using the macOS Beta. There are still bugs open even for latest Firefox and it is unclear if they will be resolved for the general 10.15 release. So please at least wait. We do not

Re: Need help to upgrade latest Seamonkey

On 12/09/19 00:23, jprin...@gmail.com wrote: There's a message in SM advising I update to the latest V2.49.5 I downloaded the appropriate version (Linux x64 British English) and extracted the files. I see one named updater but clicking on it does nothing. I can't find newbie instructions and

Need help to upgrade latest Seamonkey

There's a message in SM advising I update to the latest V2.49.5 I downloaded the appropriate version (Linux x64 British English) and extracted the files. I see one named updater but clicking on it does nothing. I can't find newbie instructions and seek some guidance. My distro is MX-18.3_x64

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

Dirk Munk wrote: JAS wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Why don't you just use "Let SeaMonkey manage the size of my cache" in Advanced->Cache? FRG I am using Seamonkey 2.48 on Windows 7 wit 8gb memory and my browser freezes all the time, I have disk-cache set to "let Seamonkey set" and in

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

JAS wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Why don't you just use "Let SeaMonkey manage the size of my cache" in Advanced->Cache? FRG I am using Seamonkey 2.48 on Windows 7 wit 8gb memory and my browser freezes all the time, I have disk-cache set to "let Seamonkey set" and in about:config I have

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Why don't you just use "Let SeaMonkey manage the size of my cache" in Advanced->Cache? FRG I am using Seamonkey 2.48 on Windows 7 wit 8gb memory and my browser freezes all the time, I have disk-cache set to "let Seamonkey set" and in about:config I have the

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

the 64 bit builds of WG9s. I'm very happy with them in general. However, after installing a new version of 2.49.5 a short while ago, I  experienced some weird problems like keystrokes that became garbled, very sluggish responses etc. A new upgrade to 2.53 didn't help, so I tried to figure out

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

em in general. However, after installing a new version of 2.49.5 a short while ago, I  experienced some weird problems like keystrokes that became garbled, very sluggish responses etc. A new upgrade to 2.53 didn't help, so I tried to figure out what might be the cause. Then I had a hunch, and I check

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

. I'm very happy with them in general. However, after installing a new version of 2.49.5 a short while ago, I experienced some weird problems like keystrokes that became garbled, very sluggish responses etc. A new upgrade to 2.53 didn't help, so I tried to figure out what might be the cause

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

erienced some weird problems like keystrokes that became garbled, very sluggish responses etc. A new upgrade to 2.53 didn't help, so I tried to figure out what might be the cause. Then I had a hunch, and I checked the config file for the browser cache setting. It was just about 0.5 GB,

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

problems like keystrokes that became garbled, very sluggish responses etc. A new upgrade to 2.53 didn't help, so I tried to figure out what might be the cause. Then I had a hunch, and I checked the config file for the browser cache setting. It was just about 0.5 GB, and I'm sure it was much

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

keystrokes that became garbled, very sluggish responses etc. A new upgrade to 2.53 didn't help, so I tried to figure out what might be the cause. Then I had a hunch, and I checked the config file for the browser cache setting. It was just about 0.5 GB, and I'm sure it was much bigger. I've now

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

problems like keystrokes that became garbled, very sluggish responses etc. A new upgrade to 2.53 didn't help, so I tried to figure out what might be the cause. Then I had a hunch, and I checked the config file for the browser cache setting. It was just about 0.5 GB, and I'm sure it was much

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

responses etc. A new upgrade to 2.53 didn't help, so I tried to figure out what might be the cause. Then I had a hunch, and I checked the config file for the browser cache setting. It was just about 0.5 GB, and I'm sure it was much bigger. I've now increased browser.cache.memory.capacity to 2 GB

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

keystrokes that became garbled, very sluggish responses etc. A new upgrade to 2.53 didn't help, so I tried to figure out what might be the cause. Then I had a hunch, and I checked the config file for the browser cache setting. It was just about 0.5 GB, and I'm sure it was much bigger. I've now

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

ry sluggish responses etc. A new upgrade to 2.53 didn't help, so I > tried to figure out what might be the cause. > > Then I had a hunch, and I checked the config file for the browser cache > setting. It was just about 0.5 GB, and I'm sure it was much bigger. > > I've now increase

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

sluggish responses etc. A new upgrade to 2.53 didn't help, so I tried to figure out what might be the cause. Then I had a hunch, and I checked the config file for the browser cache setting. It was just about 0.5 GB, and I'm sure it was much bigger. I've now increased

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

responses etc. A new upgrade to 2.53 didn't help, so I tried to figure out what might be the cause. Then I had a hunch, and I checked the config file for the browser cache setting. It was just about 0.5 GB, and I'm sure it was much bigger. I've now increased browser.cache.memory.capacity to 2 GB

Re: Memory cache was reset after upgrade

Dirk Munk wrote: I'm using the 64 bit builds of WG9s. I'm very happy with them in general. However, after installing a new version of 2.49.5 a short while ago, I  experienced some weird problems like keystrokes that became garbled, very sluggish responses etc. A new upgrade to 2.53 didn't

Memory cache was reset after upgrade

I'm using the 64 bit builds of WG9s. I'm very happy with them in general. However, after installing a new version of 2.49.5 a short while ago, I  experienced some weird problems like keystrokes that became garbled, very sluggish responses etc. A new upgrade to 2.53 didn't help, so I tried

Do not upgrade yet to macOS 10.14

A bad bug in Gecko popped up today: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1489785 I tested a local 2.49.4 and didn't encounter it but to be on the safe side do not upgrade your OS yet. If it is too late and SeaMonkey becomes unusable shoot me a pm. I can provide a private 2.49.5

Changes Due to Upgrade

I noted fewer features and feature changes after upgrading: No "Options"; no one-click "Horizontal Line" (have to cursor to panel and two more clicks to get the line). I use a black screen due to vision problems, and can't see what's in the panel boxes without highlighting.

Re: Sluggish Data Manager and Stored Passwords Manager since SM 2.46 upgrade

From the 2.48b1 release notes. I should have updated the 2.46 ones too: If you experience a hang and/or get a message box that a script is busy when opening the Data Manager try deleting the webappsstore.* files from your profile folder when SeaMonkey is not running. These contain data stored

Re: Sluggish Data Manager and Stored Passwords Manager since SM 2.46 upgrade

On 7/14/2017 7:52 AM, no...@nonospam.org wrote: > I have noticed that after clicking on either Tools->Data Manager or > Tools->Password Manager->Manage Stored Passwords and clicking in the > search domains box, the title bar then displays SeaMonkey (not > responding) for about 30 seconds before

Sluggish Data Manager and Stored Passwords Manager since SM 2.46 upgrade

I have noticed that after clicking on either Tools->Data Manager or Tools->Password Manager->Manage Stored Passwords and clicking in the search domains box, the title bar then displays SeaMonkey (not responding) for about 30 seconds before I can continue. I think this started when I upgraded

Re: Error after upgrade to 2.40

On 07/12/2016 01:05, datux2...@gmail.com wrote: > Dear all, > anybody can help me.. i get this error after upgrade to 2.40. > I do clean install, and do reinstall, but the problem still occur. In the URL bar, type about:crashes Paste the top 3 Report IDs.

Error after upgrade to 2.40

Dear all, anybody can help me.. i get this error after upgrade to 2.40. I do clean install, and do reinstall, but the problem still occur. Please help. Thank you. AdapterDeviceID: 0x0116 AdapterDriverVersion: 8.951.0.0 AdapterSubsysID: 21e317aa AdapterVendorID: 0x8086 Add-ons

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

On 5/8/2016 5:28 AM, WaltS48 wrote: On 05/07/2016 04:07 PM, Ant wrote: On 5/7/2016 5:42 AM, WaltS48 wrote: The new look went live today. Like it, but annoyed I have to click the Almanac link to get yesterday's history, when I could just stay on the home page before. Is that link going to

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

On 05/07/2016 04:07 PM, Ant wrote: On 5/7/2016 5:42 AM, WaltS48 wrote: The new look went live today. Like it, but annoyed I have to click the Almanac link to get yesterday's history, when I could just stay on the home page before. Is that link going to wunderground.com? I haven't used the

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

On 5/7/2016 5:42 AM, WaltS48 wrote: The new look went live today. Like it, but annoyed I have to click the Almanac link to get yesterday's history, when I could just stay on the home page before. Is that link going to wunderground.com? I haven't used the Network tool in Firefox to see what

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

On 05/07/2016 05:14 AM, Ant wrote: On 5/6/2016 7:11 AM, WaltS48 wrote: The new look went live today. Like it, but annoyed I have to click the Almanac link to get yesterday's history, when I could just stay on the home page before. Is that link going to wunderground.com? I haven't used the

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

On 5/6/2016 7:11 AM, WaltS48 wrote: ... Did users using a browser below Firefox 43.0 or SeaMonkey 2.40 have the site work, or see the update nag. I think the older Firefox web version users had issues too. I don't remember the details. SeaMonkey v2.40 was using Firefox v43 according to its

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

On 05/06/2016 09:42 AM, Isaac Schemm wrote: WaltS48 wrote: On 05/06/2016 01:54 AM, Daniel wrote: On 5/05/2016 11:16 PM, dlemir...@gmail.com wrote: I'm happy to see it fixed. I'm among the naggers, and had some fun with my complaint: You don't have a relevant issue so I just picked one.

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

WaltS48 wrote: On 05/06/2016 01:54 AM, Daniel wrote: On 5/05/2016 11:16 PM, dlemir...@gmail.com wrote: I'm happy to see it fixed. I'm among the naggers, and had some fun with my complaint: You don't have a relevant issue so I just picked one. Your obsolete browser message is crappy and

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

On 05/06/2016 01:54 AM, Daniel wrote: On 5/05/2016 11:16 PM, dlemir...@gmail.com wrote: I'm happy to see it fixed. I'm among the naggers, and had some fun with my complaint: You don't have a relevant issue so I just picked one. Your obsolete browser message is crappy and infuriating. I'm

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

On 5/3/2016 9:39 AM, Ant wrote: "Upgrade now! Don't miss out on a better weather.com. We no longer support this version of the browser. Please upgrade to ensure you get the best weather.com experience possible. Internet Explorer Icon Firefox Icon Chrome Icon Safari Icon Have ques

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

On 5/05/2016 11:16 PM, dlemir...@gmail.com wrote: I'm happy to see it fixed. I'm among the naggers, and had some fun with my complaint: You don't have a relevant issue so I just picked one. Your obsolete browser message is crappy and infuriating. I'm running *Google Chrome* on a

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

WaltS48 wrote: On 05/04/2016 10:42 PM, cmcadams wrote: Big Jim wrote: On 5/4/2016 10:19 PM, Ant wrote: ... MAY 04, 2016 | 08:39AM EDT LaToya replied: We apologize for your difficulties in accessing our site due to the recent introduction of a browser check and request to upgrade your

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

Ant wrote: On 5/4/2016 7:42 PM, cmcadams wrote: ... The weather.com web site now displays correctly, without showing the nag screen. They must have actually listened to us! I'll bet it's hard to ignore an inbox clogged with complaints. :) I wonder how many complaints? All from us? [grin]

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

ties in accessing our site due to the > >>>> recent introduction of a browser check and request to upgrade your > >>>> browser. We have introduced new features to our site to update its use > >>>> and some of these features are only explicitly supported

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

... MAY 04, 2016 | 08:39AM EDT LaToya replied: We apologize for your difficulties in accessing our site due to the recent introduction of a browser check and request to upgrade your browser. We have introduced new features to our site to update its use and some of these features are only

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

On 5/5/2016 5:09 AM, WaltS48 wrote: ... The weather.com web site now displays correctly, without showing the nag screen. They must have actually listened to us! I'll bet it's hard to ignore an inbox clogged with complaints. :) How many SeaMonkey users go there? There's only a little over

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

On 5/4/2016 7:42 PM, cmcadams wrote: ... The weather.com web site now displays correctly, without showing the nag screen. They must have actually listened to us! I'll bet it's hard to ignore an inbox clogged with complaints. :) I wonder how many complaints? All from us? [grin] -- "Forbear,

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

On 5/4/2016 7:29 PM, Big Jim wrote: On 5/4/2016 10:19 PM, Ant wrote: ... MAY 04, 2016 | 08:39AM EDT LaToya replied: We apologize for your difficulties in accessing our site due to the recent introduction of a browser check and request to upgrade your browser. We have introduced new features

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

On 05/04/2016 10:42 PM, cmcadams wrote: Big Jim wrote: On 5/4/2016 10:19 PM, Ant wrote: ... MAY 04, 2016 | 08:39AM EDT LaToya replied: We apologize for your difficulties in accessing our site due to the recent introduction of a browser check and request to upgrade your browser. We have

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

no...@nonospam.org composed on 2016-05-04 08:37 (UTC-0500): Ant wrote: Felix Miata wrote: ... http://geckoisgecko.org/ Let's all do it! :) That's a good idea, but input from the development team is likely to carry more weight than input from the user community. Sure, but the sea of

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

Big Jim wrote: On 5/4/2016 10:19 PM, Ant wrote: ... MAY 04, 2016 | 08:39AM EDT LaToya replied: We apologize for your difficulties in accessing our site due to the recent introduction of a browser check and request to upgrade your browser. We have introduced new features to our site

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

On 5/4/2016 10:19 PM, Ant wrote: ... MAY 04, 2016 | 08:39AM EDT LaToya replied: We apologize for your difficulties in accessing our site due to the recent introduction of a browser check and request to upgrade your browser. We have introduced new features to our site to update its use

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

... MAY 04, 2016 | 08:39AM EDT LaToya replied: We apologize for your difficulties in accessing our site due to the recent introduction of a browser check and request to upgrade your browser. We have introduced new features to our site to update its use and some of these features are only

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

adar=r and sent them a msg about it last night. Received this response: + MAY 04, 2016 | 08:39AM EDT LaToya replied: We apologize for your difficulties in accessing our site due to the recent introduction of a browser check and request to upgrad

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

On 5/4/2016 10:01 AM, NFN Smith wrote: Ant wrote: I will be using http://geckoisgecko.org/ for now on. It's much better than me having to explain it! The intention there is good, but IMO, the value is somewhat limited, by the fact that too much of the data is several years old. ... Wow,

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

Ant wrote: I will be using http://geckoisgecko.org/ for now on. It's much better than me having to explain it! The intention there is good, but IMO, the value is somewhat limited, by the fact that too much of the data is several years old. Thus, almost everything there is either *very*

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

On 5/4/2016 6:09 AM, WaltS48 wrote: ... That must stink for Internet Explorer users. =-O The SeaMonkey development team added the "Advertise Firefox compatibility" preference to Edit > Preferences > Advanced > HTTP Networking many versions ago. As I understand it, to mitigate these problems.

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

:39AM EDT LaToya replied: We apologize for your difficulties in accessing our site due to the recent introduction of a browser check and request to upgrade your browser. We have introduced new features to our site to update its use and some of these features are only explicitly supported by

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

... Sorry I can't test 2.40. I only have 2.46a1 installed, with weather.com as my home page, and it works fine. What version is v2.46's UA for its Firefox? I think it doesn't like SM's v2.40's Firefox version in its UA. :( FF equivalent version = SM bits plus 1 so SM 2.46 is equivalent to FF

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

David H. Durgee wrote: WaltS48 wrote: On 05/04/2016 09:37 AM, no...@nonospam.org wrote: Ant wrote: On 5/3/2016 11:24 PM, Felix Miata wrote: notme composed on 2016-05-04 00:56 (UTC-0500): Has anyone from the SeaMonkey development team told these folks that SeaMonkey is just a variation of

Re: weather.com nags me to upgrade my SeaMonkey web browser!

WaltS48 wrote: On 05/04/2016 09:37 AM, no...@nonospam.org wrote: Ant wrote: On 5/3/2016 11:24 PM, Felix Miata wrote: notme composed on 2016-05-04 00:56 (UTC-0500): Has anyone from the SeaMonkey development team told these folks that SeaMonkey is just a variation of Firefox? Probably not.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >