Re: Lost Bookmarks and Message Filter Items

2012-02-08 Thread Daniel
TMitchell wrote: Trying to recover SeaMonkey 2.5 from failed attempts to update to 2.7 resulted in a loss of all my bookmarks and message-filter settings. Can I copy them back into SeaMonkey from a saved Profiles file or somewhere and, if so, where are they? Close SeaMonkey then Ctrl-Alt-Del

Re: Is Lightning compatible with SM 2.7?

2012-02-08 Thread WLS
On 02/07/2012 09:26 PM, flyguy wrote: I'm using Lightning 1.1.1 on SM 2.6.1, but want to update to 2.7; however, I'd rather stay with 2.6.1 than lose Lightning. Lightning 1.2.1 is the one you want for SM 2.7. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/lightning/

Re: SM 2.7 upgrade questions/problems

2012-02-08 Thread chicagofan
MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 08/02/2012 00:53, Ed Mullen told the world: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/index.html You want the Java SE 7u2 JRE, not the JDK. Just click the red Download button under JRE. Actually, it's easier just to go to

Re: SM 2.7 upgrade questions/problems

2012-02-08 Thread chicagofan
David E. Ross wrote: On 2/7/12 4:11 PM, chicagofan wrote [in part]: Also, I can no longer run speed tests at dslreports.com, because Java or java applets(?) are missing with 2.7. What can I do about this? Windows XP SP3 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 SeaMonkey/2.7

[Off-topic] 800 x 600 full-screen in Windows 7

2012-02-08 Thread Philip TAYLOR
chicagofan wrote: Thanks, guys. I've got even bigger problems so this new new laptop may be going back and I won't have to worry about that for now. Win7 display options do not allow 800x600 resolution in full screen mode, and I spend too much time on my laptop to squint at that miniscule

Re: [Off-topic] 800 x 600 full-screen in Windows 7

2012-02-08 Thread chicagofan
Philip TAYLOR wrote: chicagofan wrote: Thanks, guys. I've got even bigger problems so this new new laptop may be going back and I won't have to worry about that for now. Win7 display options do not allow 800x600 resolution in full screen mode, and I spend too much time on my laptop to

Re: [Off-topic] 800 x 600 full-screen in Windows 7

2012-02-08 Thread chicagofan
chicagofan wrote: Philip TAYLOR wrote: chicagofan wrote: Thanks, guys. I've got even bigger problems so this new new laptop may be going back and I won't have to worry about that for now. Win7 display options do not allow 800x600 resolution in full screen mode, and I spend too much time

Re: [Off-topic] 800 x 600 full-screen in Windows 7

2012-02-08 Thread Philip TAYLOR
chicagofan wrote: I've read 40-50 messages in forums about this resolution problem, with people debating how to solve this problem that many people with different brand pc's/graphics cards are having... without finding a resolution to mine. I suspect all the Win7 adjustments being

Re: [Off-topic] 800 x 600 full-screen in Windows 7

2012-02-08 Thread chicagofan
Philip TAYLOR wrote: chicagofan wrote: I've read 40-50 messages in forums about this resolution problem, with people debating how to solve this problem that many people with different brand pc's/graphics cards are having... without finding a resolution to mine. I suspect all the Win7

Re: [Off-topic] 800 x 600 full-screen in Windows 7

2012-02-08 Thread Philip TAYLOR
chicagofan wrote: What I meant was they seem to have changed their focus from personalization to specialization... and dropping a lot of the flexibility previously available in Windows O/S. Thanks, Phil. I hate to give up, because I know this isn't the only brand laptop having this

Re: [Off-topic] 800 x 600 full-screen in Windows 7

2012-02-08 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Philip TAYLOR wrote: Brief reply, because we are seriously off-topic here : 1) Don't give up with Win/7. I HATED it when I first tried it on others' machines, and found myself saying over and over again Sorry, can't help you : no idea where they have hidden that in Win/7. BUT, once I got it

Re: SM 2.7 + Google now requiring cookies w/SM?

2012-02-08 Thread NoOp
On 02/07/2012 08:04 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 2/7/12 5:38 PM, NoOp wrote: On 02/07/2012 05:21 PM, NoOp wrote: ... Using the above, I am able to search, link, etc., on yahoo.com etc., without issue. It is only google.com, and only since a few hours ago that this started. Build identifier:

Re: [Off-topic] 800 x 600 full-screen in Windows 7

2012-02-08 Thread chicagofan
Philip TAYLOR wrote: chicagofan wrote: What I meant was they seem to have changed their focus from personalization to specialization... and dropping a lot of the flexibility previously available in Windows O/S. Thanks, Phil. I hate to give up, because I know this isn't the only brand

Re: [Off-topic] 800 x 600 full-screen in Windows 7

2012-02-08 Thread chicagofan
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Philip TAYLOR wrote: Brief reply, because we are seriously off-topic here : 1) Don't give up with Win/7. I HATED it when I first tried it on others' machines, and found myself saying over and over again Sorry, can't help you : no idea where they have hidden that in

Re: [Off-topic] 800 x 600 full-screen in Windows 7

2012-02-08 Thread Philip TAYLOR
chicagofan wrote: I can now read headings, toolbars, and icons... but I'm back to my same old problem with the new SM 2.7 fonts in composing mail and viewing some web sites. I'll keep working on it though. Thanks for the good wishes. :) Composing mail : type a character or two, then press

Re: [Off-topic] 800 x 600 full-screen in Windows 7

2012-02-08 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Philip TAYLOR wrote: Composing mail : type a character or two, then press and hold control while rotating your mouse wheel; the characters should get progressively larger. Should also work for most web sites. In my 2.6.1, you need not launch a composition window or type anything. Just do

Re: SM 2.7 + Google now requiring cookies w/SM?

2012-02-08 Thread Hartmut Figge
David E. Ross: Again: Windows XP SP3 and SeaMonkey 2.7 Gentoo Linux SM 2.10a1 I ensured there were no prior google.com cookies and that my cookies permission was set to block ALL cookies. I did a search at http://www.google.com/advanced_search?hl=en. It was successful. I did a search at

one for the calek dude

2012-02-08 Thread km
... i am quite annoy. i might even be ANGRY!!! SeaMonkey has been down the last 2 days!!! AND i am blaming you! ... i think you better heed this warning and take an early retirement before the big wigs find out and decide it would be best to fire you. km ps; the above is friendly advice

Re: one for the calek dude

2012-02-08 Thread MCBastos
Interviewed by CNN on 09/02/2012 02:13, km told the world: ... i am quite annoy. i might even be ANGRY!!! SeaMonkey has been down the last 2 days!!! AND i am blaming you! Uh... are we supposed to take this at face value? Because if it's supposed to be a joke, it's missing a couple emoticons.

Re: one for the calek dude

2012-02-08 Thread Justin Wood (Callek)
km wrote: ... i am quite annoy. i might even be ANGRY!!! SeaMonkey has been down the last 2 days!!! AND i am blaming you! ... i think you better heed this warning and take an early retirement before the big wigs find out and decide it would be best to fire you. km Note that I am not an

Re: one for the calek dude

2012-02-08 Thread Justin Wood (Callek)
km wrote: ... that's it!!! i'[m pissed! i don't like to do this but i'm gonna hafta call a press conference: :press conference!, press conference! ... i have called this press conference together today to announce to you, my people, that i, Kevin W Mc Auley, am very dissapointed in the 'calek