On 11/13/2009 06:04 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
...
You can only post to groups in e-s unless you are registered and
authenticate.
After that you can post anywhere, as you can from any other server.
Perhaps you missed:
news://news.mozilla.org:119/0a2dnru7gpw-1mhxnz2dnuvz_qsdn...@mozilla.org
On 11/12/2009 04:32 AM, MikeyG wrote:
After using Firefox and Thunderbird a few days, now, I don't know why I
stayed with SeaMonkey for so long; sorry, SeaMonkey enthusiasts ... and
'specially, SeaMonkey Developers!
I appreciated 'Form Manager'; (and miss it very, much; in Firefox and
On 11/16/2009 09:06 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Bill Davidsen:
Before I go through all that, why would that give better results than
installing
Linux on a new machine, installing SeaMonkey, creating a new normal user
account
(had to do all that anyway), then creating an e-s account.
That
On 11/16/2009 01:07 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 11/16/2009 09:06 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Bill Davidsen:
Before I go through all that, why would that give better results than
installing
Linux on a new machine, installing SeaMonkey, creating a new normal user
account
(had to do all that anyway
On 11/16/2009 06:06 PM, Drew C. wrote:
On Thursday, November 12, 2009, at 9:45 p.m., Rufus wrote:
...and who figured it was a good idea to shrink the pause and stop
buttons in the Download Progress Dialog pane to pin points?
It's like shootin' darts to hit those buttons...put 'em back the
On 11/16/2009 09:55 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Hartmut Figge:
Something has changed. Either on bugzilla or on trunk.
On bugzilla. Verified with older builds. Now even two clicks - not a
doubleclick - into the box doesn't help.
Hartmut
On 11/16/2009 07:11 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 11/16/2009 06:06 PM, Drew C. wrote:
...
Agreed. I've tried 2.0 and have found it generally an improvement over 1.x,
but I don't like the new download progress dialog. Specifically, I miss
1.x's large buttons and, more critically, the ability to easily
On 11/17/2009 08:22 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
... trim *Please*
SeaMonkeyPreferencesBrowserTabbed Browsing
Check the appropriate box. If that's not working for oyu, we will have
to look further.
Lee
I did try that. it does work. But I should have to. But It should
On 11/18/2009 09:03 AM, Benoit Renard wrote:
NoOp wrote:
My apologies; I've also been informed by jens that the bug is related to
where the file has been downloaded *locally*. Sorry, never paid much
attention to that feature as I set downloads to go to only one folder
can find the file
On 11/19/2009 07:07 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Subject: says it all. :)
...
As a secondary question, How about any 64 bit Linux
distributions?
+1
Why no 'official' 64bit linux build?
Rostyslaw, you can use this one in the interim (use at your own risk of
course):
On 11/20/2009 06:25 PM, Bush wrote:
Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They
No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they
Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port
110 ( No security). Which doesnot make
On 11/20/2009 11:34 PM, Cedar wrote:
When I go to this website with SM 2: www.cattlenetwork.com, I get the
following error message:
XML Parsing Error: mismatched tag. Expected: /meta.
Location: http://www.cattlenetwork.com/
Line Number 36, Column 449:meta name=google-site-verification
On 11/21/2009 03:47 PM, Edward wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 11/19/2009 07:07 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Subject: says it all. :)
...
As a secondary question, How about any 64 bit Linux
distributions?
+1
Why no 'official' 64bit linux build?
Rostyslaw, you can use this one in the interim (use
On 11/21/2009 04:59 PM, Bush wrote:
...
Had to go back port 110 None SSL
Talking to the Gateway at http://192.168.1.254/ I see nothing wrong
with the Built-in Firewall
All settings are correct .
This might be of interest suggests that the problem may have been
(what else?) the ATT
On 11/22/2009 08:55 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/22/2009 12:10 AM, Cedar wrote:
Would somebody mind telling me what this browser sniffing thing is all
about?
See my http://www.rossde.com/internet/Webdevelopers.html#sniff.
@Cedar:
And to modify your UA:
In the address bar, type in:
On 11/22/2009 12:11 PM, Bush wrote:
Well today SSL works on all my computers . Very Very Strange... Tech
suport says Mozilla products cannot use SSL on att yahoo servers ,,, I
do a few Newsgroup Postings, And All of a Sudden SSL works with
Seamonkey . Very Very Strange unless Tach
On 11/21/2009 08:56 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:36:54 +0100, Hartmut Figge wrote:
D. K. Kraft:
Harmut, does one need the -no-remote parameter on both the 1.1.18 and the 2.0
shortcuts? Or does it suffice just to have it on the 2.0 shortcut?
I haven't tested this. When i
On 11/22/2009 12:19 PM, Bush wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 11/22/2009 12:11 PM, Bush wrote:
Well today SSL works on all my computers . Very Very Strange... Tech
suport says Mozilla products cannot use SSL on att yahoo servers ,,, I
do a few Newsgroup Postings, And All of a Sudden SSL works
On 11/22/2009 01:25 PM, NoOp wrote:
...
Actually, you might want to check again... '-no-noremote' works just
fine for me on Win2KPro in both 1.1.18 2.0. That is how I test both in
Windows via a VM (VirtualBox) at the same time so that I can easily compare.
Sorry: should be '-no-remote
On 11/22/2009 01:45 PM, Bush wrote:
Lee wrote:
Bush wrote:
Has everyone else on Att Who reported that ssl port 995 doesnot work on
att Suddenly get SSL back?.
Well it works for me after all those earlier problems.
My question is WHY did ATT Tech Support LIE to Me .
You're joking... right?
On 11/22/2009 01:35 PM, Bush wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
You might want to hang out here for awhile:
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/uverse
But seriously... Your post were the only post that Were Blank in the
message area . post from others were Fine .
Wouldn't be the first time that I shot
On 11/22/2009 04:03 AM, Edward wrote:
The 64-bit SM 2.0.1pre mentioned above, is working with 64-bit Linux, as
is the 64-bit Flash plugin.
Cool... now if we could just get an 'official' 2.0 build 64bit'ers would
be happy.
___
support-seamonkey
On 11/21/2009 02:12 PM, art wrote:
On 11/21/09 5:02 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
..
The wrap is only visual. If you observe the source of the message
you'll see the link text is continuous. Copying and pasting it in a
simple plain text editor should also show the text is not broken.
The
On 11/22/2009 12:19 PM, Bush wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 11/22/2009 12:11 PM, Bush wrote:
Well today SSL works on all my computers . Very Very Strange... Tech
suport says Mozilla products cannot use SSL on att yahoo servers ,,, I
do a few Newsgroup Postings, And All of a Sudden SSL works
On 11/22/2009 05:04 PM, Bush wrote:
NoOp wrote:
This post was Blank
What post? Your headers show no reference header:
Path:
Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.mozilla.org!news.mozilla.org.POSTED!not-for-mail
On 11/22/2009 05:49 PM, Bush wrote:
Bush wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Bush:
Is anyone else seeing Blank post from NoOp ? hope we get a few answers
to see who is Cracking up.. u or Me ?
Try Preferences-Advanced-Cache-Clear Cache, then select another
posting and then go back to the one
On 11/22/2009 05:47 PM, Bush wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Bush:
Is anyone else seeing Blank post from NoOp ? hope we get a few answers
to see who is Cracking up.. u or Me ?
Try Preferences-Advanced-Cache-Clear Cache, then select another
posting and then go back to the one without body
On 11/23/2009 12:24 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:28:29 -0800, NoOp wrote:
On 11/22/2009 01:25 PM, NoOp wrote:
...
Actually, you might want to check again... '-no-noremote' works just
fine for me on Win2KPro in both 1.1.18 2.0. That is how I test both in
Windows via a VM
On 11/23/2009 07:13 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/22/2009 11:38 PM, Cedar wrote:
Wow! You guys are fantastic! That actually workedI can even click
on the e-mail newsletter links and get there now! Holy Cow! (haha)
But now, should I leave this new string in about:config permanently?
On 11/23/2009 02:42 PM, Mark Hansen wrote:
On 11/23/2009 1:34 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 11/23/2009 12:24 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
So here is a way to test:
1. Start SM 2.0 /without/ the -no-remote switch.
2. While 2.0 is running start 1.1 with a -no-remote switch. Does 1.1
open or just another
On 11/23/2009 05:23 PM, Mark Hansen wrote:
On 11/23/2009 4:06 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 11/23/2009 02:42 PM, Mark Hansen wrote:
On 11/23/2009 1:34 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 11/23/2009 12:24 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
So here is a way to test:
1. Start SM 2.0 /without/ the -no-remote switch.
2. While 2.0
On 11/24/2009 02:05 AM, Martin Freitag wrote:
Hartmut Figge schrieb:
NoOp:
If I Start SM 2.0 /without/ the -no-remote switch and start 1.1 with
a -no-remote switch I will only get another 2.0 window.
Well, on Linux i will get SM1 then. *g*
And that's the point. NoOp, you're using Linux
On 11/24/2009 01:14 PM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:42:13 -0800, /NoOp/:
Actually there are other issues with URL's SM 2.0. For example if I
copy this link into SM:
http://www.google.com/webhp?complete=0#complete=0hl=enq=ubuntu+%2B*ERROR*+Failed+to+restore+crtc;
Notice
On 11/24/2009 09:44 PM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:43:14 -0800, /NoOp/:
Now I
wonder how the Percent-Encoding can be resolved in
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=475896
I guess we need a separate bug as it seems the problem is observed
when copying
On 11/25/2009 06:10 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 11/24/2009 09:44 PM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:43:14 -0800, /NoOp/:
Now I
wonder how the Percent-Encoding can be resolved in
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=475896
I guess we need a separate bug as it seems
On 11/25/2009 06:58 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 11/25/2009 06:10 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 11/24/2009 09:44 PM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:43:14 -0800, /NoOp/:
Now I
wonder how the Percent-Encoding can be resolved in
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=475896
I guess we need
Ran into an interesting problem today; ATT (my isp) had issues with
their email server today. I opened up SM 2.0 (linux) and found that all
but one account (this one) were working. I couldn't send msgs, couldn't
receive msgs etc. I couldn not even log on to the ATT webmail.
So... I bit the bullet
On 11/29/2009 08:35 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
NoOp:
So it appears that there is something in the 2.0 password routine that
gets stuck when it gets a refused password or error from the isp side.
I'm not sure how to test further.
If you could get a log that would be helpful.
https
On 11/29/2009 08:41 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 11/29/2009 08:35 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
NoOp:
So it appears that there is something in the 2.0 password routine that
gets stuck when it gets a refused password or error from the isp side.
I'm not sure how to test further.
If you could get a log
On 11/30/2009 06:33 PM, Bush wrote:
Graham wrote:
Bush wrote:
I got ris of seamonkey 2.0 and went back to ver 1.1.18 and No problems
with Certificates
Having read your ranting in other threads, and not paying attention to
what you've been told (esp re user agent spoofing), I'd say you've
On 11/24/2009 10:20 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
It seems that a fix is available for this problem, assuming you are
willing to build your own SeaMonkey from source. Bug #484656 seems to
change the You have your config wrong to we were parsing your config
On 12/02/2009 02:27 PM, Rob Steinmetz wrote:
Is Printing supposed to work in Seamonkey 2.0 Lightning pre1.x?.
When I try to print a month calendar I get the print menu, but no
preview in the box and hitting the print button doesn't seem to do anything.
Works for me (linux).
Try selecting
On 12/02/2009 04:08 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
Two recent threads in mozilla.support.seamonkey on this issue resulted
in very lengthy discussions. See Seamonkey and U.S. Government site
does not work at
news://news.mozilla.org:119/so-dntlowokak43wnz2dnuvz_r6dn...@mozilla.org
and Web site work
On 11/29/2009 08:12 PM, NoOp wrote:
...
So it appears that there is something in the 2.0 password routine that
gets stuck when it gets a refused password or error from the isp side.
I'm not sure how to test further.
I was able to reproduce the issue... copied a SM 2.0 from a backup
system
://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/nightly/latest-comm-1.9.1/win32-xpi/
NoOp wrote:
On 12/02/2009 02:27 PM, Rob Steinmetz wrote:
Is Printing supposed to work in Seamonkey 2.0 Lightning pre1.x?.
When I try to print a month calendar I get the print menu, but no
preview
On 12/02/2009 05:49 PM, Leonidas Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/2/2009 5:09 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
I previously wrote [in part]:
/snip/
I can't see the individual listing's either using a Mac and SM
1.1.18...but I have a question - do you have to log into the TV
On 12/03/2009 10:18 AM, Martin Freitag wrote:
S. Beaulieu schrieb:
Martin Freitag a écrit :
Select the proper encoding there at the top (above the fonts).
Common encodings are Western and Unicode. If you change the fixed width
font for both, it should have an effect.
It changes the fonts
On 12/03/2009 01:21 PM, Rob Steinmetz wrote:
I'll try the latest one. I'm using one for a month or so ago.
I put the link to the nightly on my personal bookmark bar - that way I
remember to update when I also update my 2.01pre nightly as well.
___
On 12/03/2009 03:03 PM, Rob Steinmetz wrote:
...
Finally the Monthly Grid does not print Category Colors.
Works for me... perhaps you need to reboot again :-)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
On 12/03/2009 06:16 PM, rob wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 12/03/2009 03:03 PM, Rob Steinmetz wrote:
...
Finally the Monthly Grid does not print Category Colors.
Works for me... perhaps you need to reboot again :-)
Are you sure? I get the Calender Color just not the Category Color.
Our web
On 12/05/2009 06:20 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Bush wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Bush wrote:
Danny Kile wrote:
Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0. However, it did not work
in Seamonkey 1.1.18 either. When looking and the program listing if
you
On 12/07/2009 01:02 PM, Cedar wrote:
Bernard Mercier wrote:
Cedar a couché sur son écran :
What would be the correct path for the cache file, if there is one?
Does it make a difference to SM's performance if it is in a different
spot? Is it supposed to be in the same folder as the rest of
On 12/07/2009 04:43 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Martin Freitag wrote:
...
In that case, my space-bar is requesting profit sharing from you ;-P
...
Most *support* Groups prefer no snipping what so ever so that threading
can be maintained, to determine what steps in solving a problem have
been
On 12/07/2009 05:06 PM, John wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
John wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John wrote:
All I can say is that I tried several times to install 2.0 over 1.1.18
and it corrupted my iTunes file and would not open. That would suggest
that there is a problem moving between the
On 12/07/2009 05:52 AM, Smiles wrote:
Good day
one of my email accounts is being hit by over 20 emails daily with ?
marks of different length in subject and sender field. if I save one as
text it is blank, so I set up a filter up to send all to trash by
setting from value a a single '?'
On 12/07/2009 06:16 PM, John Boyle wrote:
To NoOp: And how would you know this, using LINUX? Are you also a
SeaMonkey developer? INSTALLING SEAMONKEY 2.0 HAS BEEN KNOWN TO DESTROY
ALL SORTS OF THINGS THAT HAVE TO BE DOWNLOADED OR HAVE BEEN DOWNLOADED
THROUGH IT! After all, what are ALL
On 12/09/2009 06:31 AM, John wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
So John are you the same Rick from that thread?
pawall...@gmail.com
My guess is you are.
no
Ah. Then there are two of you that have lost itunes files. Perhaps it
might be a good idea to start a new thread (perhaps: SM2.0 + lost
On 12/09/2009 08:54 AM, NoOp wrote:
On 12/09/2009 06:31 AM, John wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
So John are you the same Rick from that thread?
pawall...@gmail.com
My guess is you are.
no
Ah. Then there are two of you that have lost itunes files. Perhaps it
might be a good idea to start
On 12/09/2009 08:50 AM, Joe Mueller wrote:
I acquired an application that uses SVGView support to display large
images. I found support for IE but so far, none for Seamonkey.
Does anyone know where I can find it?
Thanks in advance.
A bit dated, but perhaps these will give you a starting
On 12/11/2009 07:00 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Martin Freitag wrote:
JAS schrieb:
I aqm using SM2 and the lightning extension I am using works great-I
received a pop up and said SM2.0.1 was available and I checked it out
but it states that my Lightning 1.0pre will not work--is there a version
On 12/11/2009 06:04 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/11/2009 3:25 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/11/2009 12:27 PM, S. Beaulieu wrote:
Samuel S a écrit :
I Am finding that for messages already in folders, even in the main
folder, when I click on Tools -
On 12/11/2009 08:10 PM, John Boyle wrote:
To Robert Kaiser: I have to laugh because you finally made a funny but
not really sarcastic joke! I spent 21 years in the Army,
I'll only say this once:
Stop.
Nobody cares that you spent 21 years in the Army (I spent over 10 years
in the US Army and
On 12/12/2009 06:13 PM, Chuck Johnson wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
I request those who report that It works for me to select [Help
About SeaMonkey] from your menu bar. Please reply in this thread --
replying to your own prior reply -- indicating whether or not
On 12/12/2009 07:13 PM, John Boyle wrote:
..
To NoOp: STOP YOURSELF: I finally say something reasonable and , I must
say very personal, and you want to go off in a tangent! It so happens I
have a BSM, myself and a few others besides: I only mentioned that and
other parts of the statement
On 12/12/2009 08:55 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
each account or mailbox has it own set of filters.
And?
If you you select either one in the filter manager (Tools|Filter
Manger|Filters for:) and elect to 'Run selected filter(s) on: xyz
what happens? Is that not available
On 12/13/2009 05:31 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 12/12/2009 08:55 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
each account or mailbox has it own set of filters.
And?
If you you select either one in the filter manager (Tools|Filter
Manger|Filters for:) and elect to 'Run selected
On 12/14/2009 12:08 AM, Cedar wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
...
Any chance this is just seasonal traffic increase due to Christmas
shoppers online? I remember when I was on dial up with ATT, December
was always a miserable month for me. However, that was a long time ago,
so things may have
On 12/13/2009 08:53 PM, JAS wrote:
Is there a way to add Bing to the search engine preference so it can be
set as default?
You could modify one of the seamonkey/searchplugins .src files to use bing.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
On 12/14/2009 01:12 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 12/13/2009 05:31 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 12/12/2009 08:55 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
each account or mailbox has it own set of filters.
And?
If you you select either one in the filter manager
On 12/14/2009 01:08 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 12/13/2009 08:53 PM, JAS wrote:
Is there a way to add Bing to the search engine preference so it can be
set as default?
You could modify one of the seamonkey/searchplugins .src files to use bing.
Note here is the message you
On 12/14/2009 02:30 PM, beelzib...@comcast.net wrote:
... it win'y pody to newsbgoups so you won't see this.i have
thundernbird running fine. how do i import the news settings
to seamonkey 2???
sid
dnt Kn
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
On 12/16/2009 07:45 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rob Steinmetz wrote:
Does the About Seamonkey page update when you upgrade to 2.0.1?
Yes.
Mine says 2.0 and when I check for update I get No updates Available.
Try again now that 2.0.1 has been released. ;-)
When we say we are releasing on
On 12/16/2009 06:31 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
...
I also see SeaMonkey Setup 2.0.1.exe at 10.6 MB. Why is
seamonkey-2.0.1.complete.mar 3 MB larger?
Different compression, the installer uses 7zip, the MAR format is
defined with some less efficient compression format
On 12/16/2009 03:26 PM, Rob Steinmetz wrote:
I have SeaMonkey 2.0 installed. When I check for updates it finds 2.0.1
and I install it. When I restart SeaMonkey 2.0 is still there and it
still tells me that 2.0.1 is available. I have tried down loading the
full package of 2.0.1 and
On 12/17/2009 06:03 AM, MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 17/12/2009 01:02, NoOp told the world:
On 12/16/2009 03:26 PM, Rob Steinmetz wrote:
I have SeaMonkey 2.0 installed. When I check for updates it finds 2.0.1
and I install it. When I restart SeaMonkey 2.0 is still there and it
still
On 12/17/2009 08:49 AM, Rob Steinmetz wrote:
Yes it is.
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 17/12/2009 01:02, NoOp told the world:
On 12/16/2009 03:26 PM, Rob Steinmetz wrote:
I have SeaMonkey 2.0 installed. When I check for updates it finds 2.0.1
and I install it. When I restart SeaMonkey
On 12/17/2009 09:11 AM, NoOp wrote:
...
Perhaps something in C:\Program Files\SeaMonkey\install.log[1] will
offer a hint as to what happened. Open that file and see if you can see
anything obvious. Or, if you'd like to email it to me directly (drop the
.invalid) I can compare against the log
On 12/17/2009 10:58 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:44:08 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote:
Does this Portable SeaMonkey you have work on a Verizon Blackberry Curve.
KaiRo managed to get SeaMonkey 2.0a1pre running on a Nokia N810:
On 12/17/2009 03:52 AM, Lucas Levrel wrote:
Le 16 décembre 2009, Robert Kaiser a écrit :
This update can also be applied manually by selecting Check for
Updates... from the Help menu.
I don't have this. Maybe my distribution (openSUSE) disabled it to force
me to use their rpm's (which
On 12/17/2009 09:32 AM, J. Weaver Jr. wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
[1] install.log may be located in a different directory/folder if
depending upon where you've installed SeaMonkey.
On my syste,m (2.0.1 updated successfully) install.log has not been
updated since my initial 2.0 installation
On 12/17/2009 05:40 PM, Mort wrote:
...
Hi,
The download for SM 2.0.1 is not verifiable, has no certified signature,
and per my current SM 2, cannot be trusted. The download notice is from
Germany. (No slur intended, just the facts.)
What do I do about downloading the new version? Is
On 12/18/2009 11:12 AM, Zanqeutil wrote:
I love Seamonkey 2.0 and now 2.01 !
The migration went without any problems, SM2 ipmorted everything from
SM 1.1.18.
Question.
This site completely feezes my PC in SM2.
http://www.daralhayat.com/morenews/english/
SM2 CPU load is 100 %. I
On 12/20/2009 11:31 AM, Rufus wrote:
...
When and how SM asks for your Master really depends (or should depend)
on how you have your prefs set - for ex.; I'm set for SM to ask for the
Master the first time it's required, so it should not ask at startup
because you haven't done anything -
On 12/20/2009 07:36 PM, Rufus wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus wrote:
...if users aren't being considered in a development path, that's a
pretty inconsiderate way to develop a product.
I fully agree. The picture is just not that simple usually, and most of
the time it's tradeoffs between
On 12/22/2009 05:10 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 12/22/2009 05:04 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 12/22/2009 02:02 PM, Jens Hatlak wrote:
...
The reason that the pref is still appearing in about:config is that the
relevant patch applies against core code which follows different time
schedules. The pref
On 12/22/2009 06:39 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
NoOp wrote:
---snip---
But apparently do not understand the risks associated with html and
javascript in emails. You can of course choose to ignore the default
settings SeaMonkey/about:config allows you to do
On 12/22/2009 08:37 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 12/22/2009 06:39 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
NoOp wrote:
---snip---
But apparently do not understand the risks associated with html and
javascript in emails. You can of course choose to ignore the default
settings
On 12/24/2009 03:33 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/23/2009 7:47 PM, Leonidas Jones wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 12/23/2009 07:18 PM, Leonidas Jones wrote:
...
I've got PrefBar 4.3.1 installed and running fine. Lightning is an older
nightly, I'll try installing the beta
On 12/24/2009 04:09 PM, Daniel wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 12/24/2009 12:32 PM, question wrote:
Merry Xmas to all
In the USA there is a template for this:
To My Democrat Friends:
Please accept with no obligation, implied or implicit, my best wishes
for an environmentally conscious
On 12/24/2009 05:18 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
I really can't say all I know is since I removed Prefbar and Lightning I
have been crash free. and with them installed I was crashing about every
10 minutes. I sent reports on 3 of them and used my email address.
What
On 12/24/2009 09:49 PM, Philip Chee wrote:
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:52:02 -0800, NoOp wrote:
On 12/24/2009 12:32 PM, question wrote:
Merry Xmas to all
In the USA there is a template for this:
To My Democrat Friends:
You are obviously not an American because the correct terminology
On 12/25/2009 04:07 PM, Rufus wrote:
...
...your interface should be dumbed down to accommodate the dumbest
user that you are targeting your product to, or that you expect would
possibly want to try your product. Simpler is better, useful
instructive information provided is always even
On 12/25/2009 04:37 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 12/24/2009 09:49 PM, Philip Chee wrote:
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:52:02 -0800, NoOp wrote:
On 12/24/2009 12:32 PM, question wrote:
Merry Xmas to all
In the USA there is a template for this:
To My Democrat Friends:
You
On 12/25/2009 04:39 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 12/25/2009 04:07 PM, Rufus wrote:
...
...your interface should be dumbed down to accommodate the dumbest
user that you are targeting your product to, or that you expect would
possibly want to try your product. Simpler is better, useful
instructive
On 12/25/2009 05:09 PM, Rufus wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
What if you grandmother would like to use SM because you recommended it?
Or your 3rd grade aged nephew?
Actually, my 89 y.o. grandmother, her 60 y.0. live-in nurse, my 2nd
grade nephew, and multiple relatives that haven't
On 12/29/2009 05:13 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Daniel schrieb:
Us masses should not even be, directly, touching prefs.js!! Make the
changes in user.js and let SM copy them into prefs.js!!
Right, you shouldn't touch prefs.js - the masses should also never touch
or have a user.js at all,
On 12/31/2009 09:36 AM, jim wrote:
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:03:31 -0800, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net.invalid in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
snip
but having the ability to quickly change
path/user enmass in prefs.js is what enables me to easily transport an
entire .mozilla folder to another
On 12/31/2009 01:33 PM, NoOp wrote:
...
match. For example if machine 1 user is named GGxG in prefs.js:
Sorry, should be is named Bill in prefs.js
C:\\Documents and Settings\\Jim\\Application
Data\\Mozilla\\Profiles\\default\\
But machine 2's user is named Bill, I just do a mass search
On 12/31/2009 01:35 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 12/31/2009 01:33 PM, NoOp wrote:
...
match. For example if machine 1 user is named GGxG in prefs.js:
Sorry, should be is named Bill in prefs.js
Argh... anyway you get the picture.
C:\\Documents and Settings\\Jim\\Application
Data\\Mozilla
On 01/03/2010 07:07 AM, Christian Mondrup wrote:
Since SM 2 I've been unable to use a web site,
http://www.jyskordbog.dk/ordbog/, properly. The site offers an on-line
doctionary on Danish dialects. In order to display phonetic characters
it references a set of fonts which can be downloaded
1 - 100 of 2025 matches
Mail list logo
