chicagofan wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
That's strange, because these [below] were the instructions I received
by e-mail, after I wrote them about my connection problems after the
changeover from Motzarella. These instructions cleared up my problem:
It will connect with or
Bill Davidsen wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
That's strange, because these [below] were the instructions I received
by e-mail, after I wrote them about my connection problems after the
changeover from Motzarella. These instructions cleared up my problem:
It will connect with or without auth (but
chicagofan wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
In hopes of someone having a clue where 'elsewhere' might be I put
up the
screenshots. I think it points to an error inside SM2 that this
happens only
on this server which doesn't demand authentication, and one
chicagofan wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
NoOp wrote:
I do notice in your
http://www.tmr.com/~davidsen/Private/E-S_post_bug_SM2/SS-es-1.jpg that
your outgoing server is: localhost (Default). Do you actually expect to
post to news.ethernal-september.org via 'localhost (Default)'?
NNTP= SMTP,
Bill Davidsen wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
In hopes of someone having a clue where 'elsewhere' might be I put up the
screenshots. I think it points to an error inside SM2 that this happens only
on this server which doesn't demand authentication, and one other similar
Bill Davidsen wrote:
NoOp wrote:
I do notice in your
http://www.tmr.com/~davidsen/Private/E-S_post_bug_SM2/SS-es-1.jpg that
your outgoing server is: localhost (Default). Do you actually expect to
post to news.ethernal-september.org via 'localhost (Default)'?
NNTP= SMTP, SMTP is mail, used
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Bill Davidsen:
I think I've said several times, I monitored the network interface with tcpdump,
and no packets were passed,
OK.
the UA
SM.
rejected the request with the message seen, Check your config
SM refuses to send with this message.
which is correct, at
Bill Davidsen:
Before I go through all that, why would that give better results than
installing
Linux on a new machine, installing SeaMonkey, creating a new normal user
account
(had to do all that anyway), then creating an e-s account.
That will even be better.
Hartmut
On 11/16/2009 09:06 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Bill Davidsen:
Before I go through all that, why would that give better results than
installing
Linux on a new machine, installing SeaMonkey, creating a new normal user
account
(had to do all that anyway), then creating an e-s account.
That
On 11/16/2009 01:07 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 11/16/2009 09:06 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Bill Davidsen:
Before I go through all that, why would that give better results than
installing
Linux on a new machine, installing SeaMonkey, creating a new normal user
account
(had to do all that anyway),
NoOp wrote:
On 11/13/2009 06:04 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
...
You can only post to groups in e-s unless you are registered and authenticate.
After that you can post anywhere, as you can from any other server.
Perhaps you missed:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Bill Davidsen:
Does this extra information give anyone a clue?
You should really provide a log of what happens between SM2 and eternal
when you try to post. One possibility is ngrep. Another one is
https://wiki.mozilla.org/MailNews:Logging
I think I've said several
Bill Davidsen:
I think I've said several times, I monitored the network interface with
tcpdump,
and no packets were passed,
OK.
the UA
SM.
rejected the request with the message seen, Check your config
SM refuses to send with this message.
which is correct, at least for other servers and
NoOp wrote:
On 11/11/2009 02:51 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
I have put my full config up as screen shots:
http://www.tmr.com/~davidsen/Private/E-S_post_bug_SM2/
Note that SeaMonkey sends *no packets* to the NNTP host, other than
always offer auth my working server definitions, those without
Bill Davidsen:
Does this extra information give anyone a clue?
You should really provide a log of what happens between SM2 and eternal
when you try to post. One possibility is ngrep. Another one is
https://wiki.mozilla.org/MailNews:Logging
Hartmut
___
NoOp wrote:
On 11/11/2009 04:27 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
NoOp:
On 11/11/2009 03:30 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
NoOp:
I do notice in your
http://www.tmr.com/~davidsen/Private/E-S_post_bug_SM2/SS-es-1.jpg that
your outgoing server is: localhost (Default). Do you actually expect to
post to
On 11/13/2009 06:04 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
...
You can only post to groups in e-s unless you are registered and
authenticate.
After that you can post anywhere, as you can from any other server.
Perhaps you missed:
news://news.mozilla.org:119/0a2dnru7gpw-1mhxnz2dnuvz_qsdn...@mozilla.org
NoOp:
news://news.mozilla.org:119/0a2dnru7gpw-1mhxnz2dnuvz_qsdn...@mozilla.org
One caveat. A link in this form is OK for people which are subscribed to
news.mozilla.org. But they have not to be subscribed there when
accessing this NG.
And clicking on this link would create an account of
On 11/11/2009 06:42 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
NoOp:
On 11/11/2009 04:27 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Look here.
http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/et091112.png (21 KB)
What you fail to provide is the screenshot for the outgoing server.
Because it doesn't matter for this case. But here it
Bill Davidsen:
I have put my full config up as screen shots:
http://www.tmr.com/~davidsen/Private/E-S_post_bug_SM2/
Almost identical to my setup for this newsserver. Normally i am using
albasani and eternal is a reserve - hm, hopefully this is the correct
English term *g* - so the boxes for
On 11/11/2009 02:51 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
I have put my full config up as screen shots:
http://www.tmr.com/~davidsen/Private/E-S_post_bug_SM2/
Note that SeaMonkey sends *no packets* to the NNTP host, other than
always offer auth my working server definitions, those without auth
NoOp:
I do notice in your
http://www.tmr.com/~davidsen/Private/E-S_post_bug_SM2/SS-es-1.jpg that
your outgoing server is: localhost (Default). Do you actually expect to
post to news.ethernal-september.org via 'localhost (Default)'?
But that's for SMTP and not NNTP. :)
Hartmut
Hartmut Figge wrote:
NoOp:
On 11/11/2009 03:30 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
NoOp:
I do notice in your
http://www.tmr.com/~davidsen/Private/E-S_post_bug_SM2/SS-es-1.jpg that
your outgoing server is: localhost (Default). Do you actually expect to
post to news.ethernal-september.org via 'localhost
NoOp:
On 11/11/2009 04:27 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Look here.
http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/et091112.png (21 KB)
What you fail to provide is the screenshot for the outgoing server.
Because it doesn't matter for this case. But here it is.
24 matches
Mail list logo
