Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
1) Which systems will the new version(s) of SM be available and
supported on? I.e. not just Microsoft operating systems on Intel
cpus. For example: Apple MacIntoshes on their version of U*ix,
Mac G4s, other Unices, Sparc solaris, et.c.
Windows 2000 and higher,
Mac OS
In 9kadnatbvfsgnibunz2dnuvz_uown...@mozilla.org, on 03/13/09
at 06:14 PM, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
peter.potamus.the.purple.hi...@gmail.com said:
Oldest OS on computers with internet access should be Win2000 by now for
most companies ;-)
sorry, but I still know of a couple of
nobodyh...@min.net wrote:
In9kadnatbvfsgnibunz2dnuvz_uown...@mozilla.org, on 03/13/09
at 06:14 PM, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
peter.potamus.the.purple.hi...@gmail.com said:
Oldest OS on computers with internet access should be Win2000 by now for
most companies ;-)
sorry, but I still
nobodyh...@min.net wrote:
In 9kadnatbvfsgnibunz2dnuvz_uown...@mozilla.org, on 03/13/09
at 06:14 PM, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
peter.potamus.the.purple.hi...@gmail.com said:
Oldest OS on computers with internet access should be Win2000 by now for
most companies ;-)
sorry, but I still
Robert Kaiser wrote:
I don't see why a computer with an old, outdated, and insecure operating
system needs security updates for its browser for much longer.
Yeah, yeah, enough with the personal vendetta already.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
Leonidas Jones wrote:
None the less, I am in complete agreement with Robert, it is simply not
realistic for the SeaMonkey Project to continue to support Win 98/ME.
Hey, you forgot Windows 95!
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
Benoit Renard wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
None the less, I am in complete agreement with Robert, it is simply
not realistic for the SeaMonkey Project to continue to support Win 98/ME.
Hey, you forgot Windows 95!
I have no personal knowledge of offices still using 95, though I am sure
they
Robert Kaiser wrote:
mail2news wrote:
SM 2.x is not compatible with old Windows versions (Windows 9x, Me, NT)
ou with old computer but there are many and many offices and
professionnal computers that use it...
I don't see why a computer with an old, outdated, and insecure operating
system
David L. Ross wrote:
I've got to ask. So if it was September you'd be more inclined to keep
the updates running till next June? GDRFC
Not really, it's of an energy consumption and noise problem than a heat
problem.
Robert Kaiser
___
mail2news wrote:
I see that we talk about SM 2.0 (noux in 2.0 Alpha 3) but I hope that
you continue to update SM 1.1.x
SM 2.x is not compatible with old Windows versions (Windows 9x, Me, NT)
ou with old computer but there are many and many offices and
professionnal computers that use it...
The
mail2news wrote:
I see that we talk about SM 2.0 (noux in 2.0 Alpha 3)
but I hope that you continue to update SM 1.1.x
SM 2.x is not compatible with old Windows versions (Windows 9x, Me, NT)
ou with old computer but there are many and many offices
and professionnal computers that use it...
You
mail2news schrieb:
I see that we talk about SM 2.0 (noux in 2.0 Alpha 3) but I hope that
you continue to update SM 1.1.x
SM 2.x is not compatible with old Windows versions (Windows 9x, Me, NT)
ou with old computer but there are many and many offices and
professionnal computers that use it...
Martin Feitag wrote:
mail2news schrieb:
I see that we talk about SM 2.0 (noux in 2.0 Alpha 3) but I hope that
you continue to update SM 1.1.x
SM 2.x is not compatible with old Windows versions (Windows 9x, Me, NT)
ou with old computer but there are many and many offices and
professionnal
13 matches
Mail list logo
