I am having a problem with my uploads/downloads queue with 1263 (yes,
there was also a power outage - perhaps that is the problem)
FProxy will not load the Uploads or Downloads page. It just keeps
running constantly. Over in Frost, my downloads show up okay, but even
though Frost says it is downl
It appears that this board has no answersanyone have a clue as to
where these questions can be asked?(or is that another unanswerable
question) :-/
<>___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.
On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 02:41 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> What do you mean mean the uploads/downloads page "will not load"? (Ie.
> does it not show the queued files, but rather something like 'Internal
> error'?)
No, there is no end.Chromium will sit for hours "Waiting for
127.0.0.1."
I
On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 10:34 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> O
> > I can reload the Browse page or the Configuration pages,
> > but /downloads and /uploads will not load.
>
> Interesting. What does your wrapper.log file say (when you try to
> access them), if anything?
it has some lines about
On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 12:44 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> Try deleting (or moving) your node.db4o
> file and restarting, and see if the pages load again. (You'll have to
> restart all your file transfers if you do this. :|)
Bingo! Thank-you. I was looking around for a file named 'database'
someth
Everything has been running fine1268 was working.well, you know
the bugs.
Then Freenet quit, and when I restarted itnothing! I checked the
logs.nothing written to the log. I checked the wrapper.log and found
this.
INFO | jvm 5| 2010/08/16 02:47:26 | Exception in thread
I have 20 connections, 13 are backed off, 10 because of
ForwardRejectedOverload. Does that have to do with my system? The peer
system? Both? I'd sure love to be able to read up on what the Statistics
stuff is telling me - at least the stuff that I can do something about!
Any directions as to where
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 16:29 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> We are considering making it impossible to use Freenet without a browser
> supporting Javascript. Yes or no answers would be useful (feel free to make
> further comments). I will post a similar poll to FMS. I suggest somebody does
> Fr
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 14:11 -0500, Ian Clarke wrote:
> It would be really helpful if people could spend a little time to
> understand what is being debated before they start ranting.
Try again. I subscribed to this list lastMay? I have received
perhaps a half dozen messages since then until t
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 14:57 -0500, Ian Clarke wrote:
>
> And this is the problem. If you admit that you don't understand the
> issues then why express any opinion at all until you do?
>
Because as I began learning about internet safety and security, js has
been at the top of the list as the de
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 22:05 -0500, Ian Clarke wrote:
> And my vote is to ignore the votes of people who can't be bothered to
> inform themselves before expressing an opinion on a subject.
>
What do you mean, "Can't be bothered"? I've been subscribed to this
group for ~5 months with the purpose o
If I understand correctly
UDP has no such thing as flow control. So even though your machine reads
only X packets per second, the sending machine is still sending and
you're still receiving. If the packets build up too far your machine
will drop them, but you've already used the bandwidth
On 01/21/2011 11:59 AM, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
On 22/01/2011, at 7:55 AM, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 11:51:35 -0700, Ray Jones wrote:
If I understand correctly
UDP has no such thing as flow control. So even though your machine
reads only X packets per second, the sending
?
On 01/21/2011 12:19 PM, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
On 22/01/2011, at 8:04 AM, Ray Jones wrote:
On 01/21/2011 11:59 AM, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
On 22/01/2011, at 7:55 AM, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 11:51:35 -0700, Ray Jones wrote:
If I understand correctly
UDP has n
On 01/21/2011 02:34 PM, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 23:18:33 +0300, Volodya wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/21/2011 10:32 PM, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 08:22:13 +1300, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
So, the question then becomes, when the node is
On 02/26/2011 01:11 PM, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
> On Saturday 26 February 2011 16:04:41 Dennis Nezic wrote:
>
>> The community-censorship idea proposed was retarded, yes.
> On the contrary, some form of community-based censorship can be required for
> smaller communities to run Freenet in order
I have experienced repeated crashes with my node while the SSK-cache
cleaner is working. This coincides with the update to 1364. It also
coincides with a reduction from a 100GB datastore to an 80GB datastore.
The last time it crashed (also on the SSK-cache cleaner) I deleted my
entire datastore di
My node has been telling me for the past several days that it isn't the
latest version and that it will update as soon as it downloads the new
version. It still said that today, so I ran update.sh, and it tells me
I'm already running the latest version. I re-started my node, but it's
still running
On 07/26/2011 06:15 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote
> The electronic attacks mentioned above are far cheaper than any scheme to try
> to get people who run Freenet to spy on their friends. You can only spy on
> your direct friends (well, it gets less accurate the more hops away the
> target, but this
19 matches
Mail list logo
