I was going to dedicate a PC and it's resources to Freenet. I installed the
application but don't have someone to connect to. I was able to create the
URL with my information, but now I have to get on the IRC channel. I got
Mirc, but it doesn't have the freenet server listed. I'm never going to
Use it how? In Mirc? Where do I put it?
>From: Stefan Gr?nberg
>Reply-To: support at freenetproject.org
>To: support at freenetproject.org
>Subject: Re: [freenet-support] It just isn't easy
>Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:59:36 +0200
>
>use this:
>
>/server irc.freenode.net:6667 -j #Freenet-Refs
>and
Sorry to be so dumb, but when I put that in the status window and press
enter I get a message that says you are not on a channel. My status is not
connected.
>From: Stefan Gr?nberg
>Reply-To: support at freenetproject.org
>To: support at freenetproject.org
>Subject: Re: [freenet-support] It jus
I may have made it. I'm the only one in there if it's the right one
>From: Stefan Gr?nberg
>Reply-To: support at freenetproject.org
>To: support at freenetproject.org
>Subject: Re: [freenet-support] It just isn't easy
>Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:18:12 +0200
>
>yes, in the status window
>
>diddler
I'm on the irc channel. Now I have to find that place that tells me how to
post but bulix URL. I think it said use ?raw at the end, but can't remember
exactly. Once I can get this freenet connection I'll let it run with about
1/3 of my BW. I can contribute at least a little to freedon, and maybe
How do I create a signature in FROST? Also, when I reply or post a new
message I don't see my posts. I've tried posting in test but don't see them.
Any suggestions?
_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it'
I'm new to Freenet and have been watching the discussion about version 0.5
vs 0.7. I'm not sure what is meant when the 0.5 advocates talk about
OpenNet, so could someone enlighten me? I went to the Freenet site hoping to
find information related to 0.5, even in the WIKI, but it now only contains
I've got a question for the developers.
First a couple of comments.
I've been watching the thread 0.5 vs 0.7, and although you want to move it
somewhere else I welcome it.
I brought up 0.7 about 5 days ago. It's been running ever since, I think. I
don't monitor the PC that it is on, but I do s
Evan,
Would you define this statement? "they're (developers) working against a
very real
clock."
_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct
What about a pipe to the 0.5 freenet from 0.7 that allows access to the
data? A 1-way street. 0.7 can add data to the 0.7 freenet, but can and to
the 0.5 freenet. Only access the data. From what I have gathered,
'inserting' data into freenet is not a quick task.
As I see it 0.7 relies on a bun
So by running 0.7 in default mode I'm running in darknet? Or is there
another piece of the freenet puzzle I need to discover?
>From: "Evan Daniel"
>Reply-To: evand at pobox.com, support at freenetproject.org
>To: "diddler4u at hotmail.com"
>CC: support at freenetproject.org
>Subject: Re: Migra
>From: "Lars Juel Nielsen"
>to take down a darknet you have to find participants and trick
>them to letting you in and then you can start finding out which hosts
>are part of it.
Wait - Wait - You don't have to be tricked into letting someone in. All they
have to do is go to the IRC Chat and ad
>From: "Lars Juel Nielsen"
>Reply-To: support at freenetproject.org
>To: support at freenetproject.org
>Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7
>Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:54:16 +0200
>
>On 8/25/06, diddler4u at hotmail.com wrote:
>> >From: "Lars Juel Nielsen"
>>
>> >to take down a d
>
>Except that probably one of your friends knows someone on an other network,
>exchanges refs, and bang!, you've got a big worldwide network again.
>
>
Or one of them goes into an IRC chat and exchanges the information and bang
you're all busted.
___
>
>No, only he is busted.
>
How do you figure that? Doesn't he have connections that canthen be traced
and then the connections of those traced?
_
Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.com/
>It should not be possible to trace them easily. Of course, if his PC gets
>captured, that's possible.
If the person was busted their computer would be captured.
I guess the only safe way is to run freenet from inside an encrypted
(truecrypt or the like) partition or container and just hope fre
>From: "Evan Daniel"
>Reply-To: evand at pobox.com, support at freenetproject.org
>To: support at freenetproject.org
>Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7
>Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:55:31 -0400
>
>On 8/25/06, diddler4u at hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>> >It should not be possible to tra
>>Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happens
>>to be on. Freenet 0.7 doesn't have this yet. In 0.7, there is no main
>>network. There might be now, but the idea of the way it currently is
>>setup is to allow small groups to connect without connecting to
>>everyone else.
I agree. I wouldn't want to be the only connection between 2 networks, or
even one of a small few. I simply don't have the bandwidth. Maybe a T1 or T3
could handle it, but not what 90+% of the people using freenet would have to
work with.
As I follow these threads I begin to see a core group of
Evan,
You are right - there is a lot of data to show that social networks do
expand in the method being said here, but that data is based on known,
non-anonymous social networks. In an anonymous network the rule of thumb is
trust no one.
If an openet is not the solution, neither is posting inf
20 matches
Mail list logo
