So by running 0.7 in default mode I'm running in darknet? Or is there another piece of the freenet puzzle I need to discover?
>From: "Evan Daniel" <evanbd at gmail.com> >Reply-To: evand at pobox.com, support at freenetproject.org >To: "diddler4u at hotmail.com" <diddler4u at hotmail.com> >CC: support at freenetproject.org >Subject: Re: Migration path, please! (Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0, 5 >and 0,7 >Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:46:11 -0400 > >On 8/24/06, diddler4u at hotmail.com <diddler4u at hotmail.com> wrote: >>Evan, >> >>Would you define this statement? "they're (developers) working against a >>very real >>clock." > >Happily. At some point, running Freenet will (likely) become illegal, >assuming current trends continue. This includes in the West. It may >already be in France. It is safe to assume that developing Freenet >will have the same legal status, whatever that may be. > >When that happens, the darknet needs to be sufficiently functional for >development to move off the public net and onto the darknet. If the >darknet can't support a collaborative development effort by then, we >have a real problem. It may or may not be enough to kill Freenet >entirely, but it would be a big enough setback to make data resets and >incompatible versions look rosy by comparison. > >Evan >_______________________________________________ >Support mailing list >Support at freenetproject.org >http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support >Unsubscribe at >http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support >Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe _________________________________________________________________ Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.com/