So by running 0.7 in default mode I'm running in darknet? Or is there 
another piece of the freenet puzzle I need to discover?


>From: "Evan Daniel" <evanbd at gmail.com>
>Reply-To: evand at pobox.com, support at freenetproject.org
>To: "diddler4u at hotmail.com" <diddler4u at hotmail.com>
>CC: support at freenetproject.org
>Subject: Re: Migration path, please! (Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0, 5 
>and 0,7
>Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:46:11 -0400
>
>On 8/24/06, diddler4u at hotmail.com <diddler4u at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>Evan,
>>
>>Would you define this statement? "they're (developers) working against a
>>very real
>>clock."
>
>Happily.  At some point, running Freenet will (likely) become illegal,
>assuming current trends continue.  This includes in the West.  It may
>already be in France.  It is safe to assume that developing Freenet
>will have the same legal status, whatever that may be.
>
>When that happens, the darknet needs to be sufficiently functional for
>development to move off the public net and onto the darknet.  If the
>darknet can't support a collaborative development effort by then, we
>have a real problem.  It may or may not be enough to kill Freenet
>entirely, but it would be a big enough setback to make data resets and
>incompatible versions look rosy by comparison.
>
>Evan
>_______________________________________________
>Support mailing list
>Support at freenetproject.org
>http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
>Unsubscribe at 
>http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

_________________________________________________________________
Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! 
http://search.msn.com/


Reply via email to