On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 01:19:40PM +, Politis Archontis wrote:
> > The point is that, since the direct method is equivalent to
> > a decoding for the set of directions used to compute the SHT
> > (which will be the set for which you have HRIR), there is
> > nothing 'ideal' or special to it. It
> The point is that, since the direct method is equivalent to
> a decoding for the set of directions used to compute the SHT
> (which will be the set for which you have HRIR), there is
> nothing 'ideal' or special to it. It is just one specific case
> of the decoder + virtual speakers method in
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 12:52:20PM +, Politis Archontis wrote:
> One case I can think of when it is really necessary is when one needs
> to auralize binaurally the effect of a certain decoder, e.g. due to
> non-uniform arrangement of virtual loudspeakers, compared to an ideal case..
The
>> So what is the benefit then of adding a decoding stage in the middle?
> The advantage of having an explicit decoder stage is that you
> can tweak the decoder for optimum results. For example it can
> be dual-band [1], or have some front preference, etc.
I see. I find that more a matter of
> No, this is not true. The decoder and convolution matrix can be combined
> into a (N+1)^2 * 2 convolution matrix.
Ah true! by summing the terms..
> The only remaining difference is the set of directions. And it is known
> that using too many speakers for a given order is suboptimal.
So what
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 11:54:39AM +, Politis Archontis wrote:
> And I forgot to mention in the previous message that, while I don't
> see any benefit in the virtual loudspeaker approach, I see benefits
> in the direct approach. Doing the virtual loudspeaker decoding, you'll
> need some
...@linuxaudio.org]
Sent: 27 February 2016 12:14
To: sursound@music.vt.edu
Subject: Re: [Sursound] expressing HRTFs in spherical harmonics
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 09:25:48PM +, Politis Archontis wrote:
> - Measure the HRIRs at Q directions around the listener
> - Take the FFT of all measurements
> -
ase.
Regards,
Archontis
From: Sursound [sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] on behalf of Fons Adriaensen
[f...@linuxaudio.org]
Sent: 27 February 2016 12:14
To: sursound@music.vt.edu
Subject: Re: [Sursound] expressing HRTFs in spherical harmonics
On Thu, Feb
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 09:25:48PM +, Politis Archontis wrote:
> - Measure the HRIRs at Q directions around the listener
> - Take the FFT of all measurements
> - For each frequency bin perform the SHT to the complex HRTFs,
> up to maximum order that Q directions permit (and their
Hi Jorn,
Yes, you’re right. To summarize the process:
- Measure the HRIRs at Q directions around the listener
- Take the FFT of all measurements
- For each frequency bin perform the SHT to the complex HRTFs, up to maximum
order that Q directions permit (and their arrangement: for equiangular
:48
To: sursound@music.vt.edu
Subject: [Sursound] expressing HRTFs in spherical harmonics
On 01/27/2016 01:56 PM, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> On 01/26/2016 11:05 PM, Politis Archontis wrote:
>> Hi Jorn,
>>
>> yes that is correct. I think however that the virtual loudspeaker
On 01/27/2016 01:56 PM, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 01/26/2016 11:05 PM, Politis Archontis wrote:
Hi Jorn,
yes that is correct. I think however that the virtual loudspeaker
stage is unnecessary. It is equivalent if you expand the left and
right HRTFs into spherical harmonics and multiply
12 matches
Mail list logo
