[Sursound] Newbie emerges from shadows

hi all been reading this list for a long time. But not piped up till now Hi to my old professor, Dr Pickett (Surrey Tonmeister, 1982 year!) And to Mr Elen, of course (we shared an AES London discussion panel a few years back) I've finally got my 5.1 array of Adam A3x's + Adam sub working in my

Re: [Sursound] 32-channel capture

Or four Sounddevices 788T's? they lock together just fine, apparently. 96k only though -Original Message- From: sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu [mailto:sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] On Behalf Of tim...@btopenworld.com Sent: 27 March 2012 17:21 To: sursound@music.vt.edu Subject: Re:

Re: [Sursound] B-Format to Binaural

The rather fabulous Harpex plugin does this very well. www.harpex.net jon On 4 Apr 2012, at 09:13, Moritz Fehr wrote: Dear List members, over the past months, I have been following this group with great interest. I would like to ask you if you can give me some advice on converting

[Sursound] sound field company sold

Press release just arrived: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE TSL Professional Products Acquires SURROUND SOUND MICROPHONE specialist, SoundField TSL PPL Can Now Provide Solutions Across the Entire Broadcast Production Chain, From Acquisition to Delivery Amsterdam, September 7, 2012 – TSL Professional

[Sursound] DTS Headphone:X

Has anyone heard the new work by DTS called Headphone:X? I heard it recently at NAB. I was very impressed by the front and rear positioning, but not so convinced by height. Rather oddly, they have to apply a room measured impulse response as part of the simulation, to simulate the real speakers

Re: [Sursound] DTS Headphone:X

Mine is a direct copy from zuccharelli himself On 29/04/2013 12:08, Eero Aro eero@dlc.fi wrote: Jon Honeyball wrote: I have a pcm-f1 tape of the Zuccherelli stuff from 30 years ago, for those with long memories. Must pull that into a wav file, but my f1 has no digital output. Hmmm

Re: [Sursound] DTS Headphone:X

John, that could be fun - I remember the tape from when I worked for Angus McKenzie all those years ago. The bees flying around the head was the best I have got results using Harpex in Binaural mode from my Soundfield ST350 jon On 29/04/2013 12:32, John Leonard j...@johnleonard.co.uk wrote: A

Re: [Sursound] New native B-Format microphone!

And how does The patented technology allows pickup polar patterns and direction to be freely adjusted,even after the actual recording event (in mixdown)² work with prior art from the sound field? Jon On 14/11/2013 09:43, Emanuele lamacchiaco...@yahoo.it wrote: Anyone have it and can tell us

Re: [Sursound] Surprise, Surprise

Richard You have sparked a memory in the deep recesses of my headŠ Back in 1983 (might have been early 84) you visited us at the Tonmeister course at University of Surrey, to talk about ambisonics and surround, and the sound field mic (which we had at the department ‹ it was my favourite mic

Re: [Sursound] Surprise, Surprise

speakers would be very likely as that was (is) our standard array and all our decoders were 4-out only. I'm glad we made such a good impression! Best, --R On 31/12/2013 11:52, Jon Honeyball wrote: Richard You have sparked a memory in the deep recesses of my headŠ Back in 1983 (might have been early

[Sursound] Soundfield 450 Mk2

Pity this *still* doesn¹t have a 1K tone generator at say -20dB, allowing you to properly calibrate the input levels and replay of your recorder, which almost certainly doesn¹t have ganged controls. The Sounddevices 788T can do this, but others can¹t. Missed opportunity. Jon

Re: [Sursound] TSL SoundField new, and free, SurroundZone2

Somewhat of a failure of beta testing? On 20/03/2014 14:32, Paul Hodges pwh-surro...@cassland.org wrote: http://www.tslproducts.com/soundfield/surroundzone2/ Note that the Windows installer puts the 32-bit VST plugin where the 64-bit one should be and vice versa. Paul -- Paul Hodges

Re: [Sursound] Soundfield 450 Mk2

01:57 PM, Jon Honeyball wrote: Pity this *still* doesn¹t have a 1K tone generator at say -20dB, allowing you to properly calibrate the input levels and replay of your recorder, which almost certainly doesn¹t have ganged controls. The Sounddevices 788T can do this, but others can¹t. Missed

Re: [Sursound] TSL SoundField new, and free, SurroundZone2

I asked about upgrading my 350, or rather asked about if it was worth upgrading either the mic or the box, depending on which was the more critical. But I got nowhere ‹ they seemed to think I wanted to trade in part of the mic, which wasn¹t the case at all. Ah well. On 20/03/2014 14:40, John

Re: [Sursound] Soundfield 450 Mk2

The Roland R4 I had before the 788T didn’t, if I remember rightly (which is where the idea came from) jon On 20/03/2014 20:12, Daniel Courville courville.dan...@uqam.ca wrote: Le 2014-03-20 08:57, Jon Honeyball a écrit : Pity this *still* doesn¹t have a 1K tone generator at say -20dB, allowing

Re: [Sursound] Home Dolby Atmos: Overhead audio without the overhead loudspeaker?

if all else fails, go for LOTS and LOTS of phase distortion. And a few comb filters too. jon On 24 Jun 2014, at 12:20, David Pickett d...@fugato.com wrote: At 13:11 24-06-14, Dave Malham wrote: Interesting...maybe the clue is in the text it all comes down to understanding the physics of

[Sursound] 3d headphones?

email just in — I will visit them when I am at CES I have already emailed them to see if they can ingest B format. The response will either be a) yes, b) no or c) whats B format? Shall we take a vote? Jon Media Alert – 3D Sound Labs Paris, December the 2nd 2014

Re: [Sursound] AES London Lecture

It was an interesting presentation. The demonstration was not wholly convincing, I have to say — (a bongo drum sound that you could manually steer around the horizontal sound field) I think I have heard better surround from normal ambisonics. A claim for this system is that it is more

Re: [Sursound] sounds in space - June, Derby, UK

hope to be there jon On 27/04/2015 17:15, Peter Lennox p.len...@derby.ac.uk wrote: Please excuse this, if you're not interested! A one day symposium, free to attend (but registration required) -a low-pressure event, a chance to get together, have a natter, artists, engineers, perceptual

Re: [Sursound] Hooke: First Bluetooth Binaural Microphone

me too if timing works — can bring ST350 and Sound Devices 788T On 24/06/2015 00:05, Sursound on behalf of Emanuele Costantini sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu on behalf of lamacchiaco...@yahoo.it wrote: Hi John, if not busy working I could be interested in joining and I cut bring my own

Re: [Sursound] Sursound Digest, Vol 83, Issue 18

Maybe I am just turning into a grumpy old man, but any company that claims We do the maths so you can focus on being awesome” deserves an arched eyebrow, Spock-style Jon On 28/06/2015 17:04, Sursound on behalf of Anthony Mattana sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu on behalf of

Re: [Sursound] Soundfield MKV callibration question

As an aside, its a point of particular annoyance that there is no test tone generator on the ST350 or ST450 control units to allow for proper level setting in a DAW, and thus to compensate for wobbly inputs on the recorder. I asked for it, and nothing happened on the redesign of the control

[Sursound] sound field email malware

Dear TSL Further to my phone call just now Looks like two people at least have been hacked at sound field. I received these on Tuesday as you can see. Thanks Jon Honeyball CEO Woodleyside IT Ltd 2 Avro Court Ermine Business Park Huntingdon Cambs PE29 6XS 01480 708060 From: Pieter

[Sursound] sound field email malware

Looks like two people at least have been hacked at sound field: I would strongly advise not going to these URLs unless you are sure you are under appropriate safe conditions. I just phoned TSL, and the lady on reception knew nothing of it. I have forwarded these back to them. I suspect the

[Sursound] email

Hmmm, odd I posted to here about receiving emails from TSL which looked like their internal email system was compromised But the email hasn’t been posted here — dunno why. Be aware of anything untoward coming from them please. I have contacted them and informed them Jon -- next

Re: [Sursound] email

new email address & direct line phone number >email: j...@johnleonard.uk >phone +44 (0)20 3286 5942 > > >> On 30 Sep 2015, at 13:12, Jon Honeyball <j...@jonhoneyball.com> wrote: >> >> Hmmm, odd >> >> I posted to here about receiving emails from TSL whi

Re: [Sursound] St.350 controls

..@bmbcon.demon.nl> wrote: > >> On 19 Sep 2015, at 18:00, sursound-requ...@music.vt.edu wrote: >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 15:18:21 + >> From: Jon Honeyball <j...@jonhoneyball.com> >> To: "sursound@music.vt.edu"

Re: [Sursound] [OT] Recording uni lectures ...

smartphone with an appropriate Rode mic? On 21/09/2015, 16:18, "Sursound on behalf of Michael Chapman" wrote: > >Sorry 'off topic' but as we have so many academic list members ... > >A hearing-impaired student (not profoundly

Re: [Sursound] [OT] Recording uni lectures ...

how about something which wasn’t an april fool? :-) http://en.rode.com/microphones/ixy On 21/09/2015, 17:05, "Sursound on behalf of David Pickett" <sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu on behalf of d...@fugato.com> wrote: >At 17:51 21-09-15, Jon Honeyball wro

Re: [Sursound] St.350 controls

sound on behalf of David Pickett" <sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu on behalf of d...@fugato.com> wrote: >At 09:39 21-09-15, Jon Honeyball wrote: > > >Looking at the sound field.com site, at the ST450 instruction manual, > >I see the pattern knob now goes to fig 8 (and

[Sursound] B format and atoms

Are there tools out there for putting b format into atmos, and then doing atmos authoring? What are my options? Ta much jon -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Re: [Sursound] B format and atoms

We’ve just put a topline atmos system into our IEC listening room – amp/decoder thing from Pioneer, and their 5.1.4 speaker arrangement (with four upward firing speakers built into the top of the four main speakers). It works well, and is interesting especially on 4k HDR UHD bluray discs. So

Re: [Sursound] Ambi Head

Interesting – much cheaper than the alternative. On 10/03/2016, 05:53, "Sursound on behalf of Paul Doornbusch" wrote: >Hi, > >Has anyone tried Ambi Head - http://www.noisemakers.fr/ambi-head/

Re: [Sursound] Sennheiser Ambeo

I wonder if they are even aware of soundfield? Just wait for the patent applications to come trolling in… On 17/03/2016, 14:21, "Sursound on behalf of John Leonard" wrote: >That’s because it is… > >Apparently, they played around

Re: [Sursound] AES UK North Workshop on Capturing and Rendering Audio for VR

Have booked – hopefully bringing Tony Faulkner jon On 07/02/2017, 14:40, "Sursound on behalf of Hyunkook Lee" wrote: Hello, If you are in the UK (or nearby), I'd like to invite you to the AES UK North event on "Capturing and

Re: [Sursound] AES UK North Workshop on Capturing and Rendering Audio for VR

Is this fraud detection thing generated by office365 or by the SS mailing list server? I have no idea why the SS mailing list might think that office365 was a spoofed server… jon On 09/02/2017, 12:48, "Sursound on behalf of Jon Honeyball" <sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu o

Re: [Sursound] Interactive Audio Systems Symposium, York, 23rd Sept: Programme now online

e On 19 September 2016 at 16:00, Jon Honeyball <j...@jonhoneyball.com> wrote: > How many list followers are going? I am > > jon > > > ___ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.

[Sursound] st350 versus st450 cable

I have st350 with the long cable drum. A friend has an ST450mk2 but no cable drum Am I right to assume that it’s the same lemo connectors wiring etc on the st350 as the 450 and that my cable drum will work for him? I would check the TSL site, but that was useless even before the rode buy-out

Re: [Sursound] Auralization Job Available

Fosterandpertners.com ? For extra-pert audio solutions? ☺ jon On 01/11/2016, 15:20, "Sursound on behalf of Philip Robinson" wrote: Dear group, A position for an auralization specialist is coming available in my

Re: [Sursound] Auralization Job Available

No idea what this “this sender failed our fraud detection….” Thing is about? jon On 02/11/2016, 10:32, "Sursound on behalf of Jon Honeyball" <sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu on behalf of j...@jonhoneyball.com> wrote: This sender failed our fraud detection checks an

[Sursound] Sennheiser Ambeo recording headphones

Bought the Sennheiser Ambeo binaural recording headphones. I wanted some on-ear mics, and this seemed a relatively cheap and easy way to solve the problem. (Background requirement — wanting to measure the spectral shape of noise in a motorbike helmet, so when i am doing noise testing using my

Re: [Sursound] Strange 'buzz' in Ambisonic recording

Spectral analysis would be a good clue here — sounds like clipping of LF to me jon > On 7 May 2018, at 17:30, Gerard Lardner wrote: > > I'm very much an amateur here, so please forgive what might be a stupid > question! > > I recorded a concert on Saturday (John Rutter's

Re: [Sursound] Steinberg and Multichannel files

On 14 Apr 2018, at 16:42, David Pickett > wrote: Incidentally, one of the drawbacks of multichannel wavfiles for HOA is their large size for any reasonable length of musical composition. At 48kHz, a 9-channel 2nd order file takes c. 74MB for 1 minute

Re: [Sursound] Ambix to FuMa conversion

The wonderful thing about standards is the opportunity to have lots of them jon > On 14 Apr 2018, at 09:55, Jack Reynolds wrote: > > FuMa is WXYZ and ambiX is WYZX with SN3D normalisation. > I forget the gains off the top of my head, but will have a look and get

Re: [Sursound] Rode soundfield vs st350

I have both the Rode and the ST350. Just shout if you want any help j...@jonhoneyball.com > On 16 May 2019, at 15:29, Ross Adams wrote: > > Hello, > Could someone supply any links to the Sursound archives discussing the > difference between the Rode soundfield and the St350. I'm

Re: [Sursound] Recorder for ORTF-3D OUTDOOR SET

The one I want on my 788T is 4 (for sound field) plus 2 plus 2, for two stereo mics Closest I can get is 4 + 2 + 1 +1 which is vaguely annoying. I asked Sounddevices for this at NAB (and via support) a number of times, and got a shrug. Jon > On 20 Oct 2020, at 13:53, John Leonard Main

Re: [Sursound] Into Sound - Headphone Localization Hearing Test

lude hard left, right and center because my method is not > > really helping with the perception of these directions that are > > already quite good perceived. > > Another reason was to have not too many questions for the test, thus > > keeping it short. > > > >

Re: [Sursound] Into Sound - Headphone Localization Hearing Test

H You need to have “left” “center” and “right” answers too – I stopped scoring because I was getting no meaningful front/back, and so my answers would have been invalid if I continued Jon From: Sursound on behalf of Jakob Gille Date: Monday, 1 November 2021 at 11:24 To: Surround Sound

Re: [Sursound] Rode vs Ambeo as ST350 replacement?

I have st350 and rode. My sound field experience goes back to the original black frame box St350’is a good mix and has excellent flexibility for recording b format and a stereo mix. And has a decent headphone drive from the stereo mix The ride is quieter sweeter and a nicer. But it’s a