[Biofuel] (no subject)

2014-04-22 Thread Steve Racz
please unsubscribe this
___
Sustainablelorgbiofuel mailing list
Sustainablelorgbiofuel@lists.sustainablelists.org
http://lists.eruditium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel


[Biofuel] Diminishing Returns, Energy Return on Energy Invested, and Collapse

2013-12-10 Thread Steve Racz
http://ourfiniteworld.com/2013/12/06/diminishing-returns-energy-return-on-energy-invested-and-collapse/

[referenced figures and links are available from the source]

Diminishing Returns, Energy Return on Energy Invested, and Collapse

Posted on December 6, 2013 by Gail Tverberg

What do diminishing returns, energy return on energy invested (EROI or
EROEI), and collapse have to do with each other? Let me start by explaining
the connection between Diminishing Returns and Collapse.

Diminishing Returns and Collapse

We know that historically, many economies that have collapsed were ones
that have hit “diminishing returns” with respect to human labor–that is,
new workers added less production than existing workers were producing (on
average). For example, in an agricultural economy, available land might
already have as many farmers as the land can optimally use. Adding more
farmers might add a little more production–perhaps the new workers would
keep weeds down a bit better. But the amount of additional food the new
workers would produce would be less than what earlier workers were
producing, on average. If new workers were paid on the basis of their
additional food production, they would find that their wages dropped
relative to those of the original farmers.

Lack of good paying jobs for everyone leads to a need for workarounds of
various kinds. For example, swamp land might be drained to add more
farmland, or irrigation ditches might be added to increase the amount
produced per acre. Or the government might hire a larger army might to
conquer more territory. Joseph Tainter (1990) talks about this need for
workarounds as a need for greater “complexity.” In many cases, greater
complexity translates to a need for more government services to handle the
problems at hand.

Turchin and Nefedof (2009) in Secular Cycles took Tainter’s analysis a step
further,  analyzing financial data relating to historical collapses of
eight agricultural societies in operation between the years 30 B.C. E. and
1922 C. E.. Figure 1 shows my summary of the pattern they describe.

Figure 1. Shape of typical Secular Cycle, based on work of Peter Turkin and
Sergey Nefedov.

Typically, a civilization developed a new resource which increased food
availability, such as clearing a large plot of land of trees so that crops
could be planted, or irrigating an  existing plot of land. The economy
tended to expand for well over 100 years, as the population grew in size to
match the potential output of the new resource. Wages were relatively high.

Eventually, the civilization hit a period of stagflation, typically lasting
50 or 60 years, as the population hit the carrying capacity of the land,
and as additional workers did not add proportionately more output. When
this happened, the wages of common workers tended to stagnate or decrease,
resulting in increased wage disparity. The price of food tended to spike.
To counter these problems, the amount of government services rose, as did
the amount of debt.

Ultimately, what brought the civilizations down was the inability of
governments to collect enough taxes for expanded government services from
the increasingly impoverished citizens. Other factors played a role as
well–more resource wars, leading to more deaths; impoverished common
workers not being able to afford an adequate diet, so plagues were more
able to spread; overthrown or collapsing governments; and debt defaults.
Populations tended to die off.  Such collapses took place over a long
period, typically 20 to 50 years.

For those who are familiar with economic theory, the shape of the curve in
Figure 1 is very similar to the production function mentioned in Two Views
of our Current Economic and Energy Crisis. In fact, the three main phases
are the same as well. The issue in both cases is diminishing returns
ultimately leading to collapse.

There seems to be a parallel to the current world situation. The energy
resource that we learned to develop this time is fossil fuels, starting
with coal about 1800. World population was able to expand greatly because
of additional food production permitted by fossil fuels and because of
improvements in hygiene. A period of stagflation began in the 1970s, when
we first encountered problems with US oil production and spiking oil
prices.  Now, the question is whether we are approaching the Crisis Stage
as described by Turchin and Nefedov.

Why Might an Economy Collapse?

Let’s think about how an economy operates. It is built up from many parts,
over time. It includes one or more governments, together with the laws and
regulations they pass and together with their financial systems. It
includes businesses and consumers. It includes built infrastructure, such
as roads and electricity transmission lines. It even includes traditions
and customs, such as whether savings are held in gold jewelry or in banks,
and whether farms are inherited by the oldest son. As each new business is
formed, the owners make 

[Biofuel] NZ on track to miss targets by huge margin

2013-11-03 Thread Steve Racz
NZ on track to miss targets by huge margin, 28 Oct, 2013
http://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2013/10/28/policy-politics/nz-track-miss-targets-huge-margin


Climate
Policy  Politics

Reuters Point Carbon

New Zealand’s greenhouse gas emissions are set to rise nearly 50 per cent
by 2040, according to new government modelling, taking the country well off
course to meet its commitment to cut emissions in half by mid-century.*

A report from the ministry of environment showed the country’s net
emissions are expected to grow to nearly 90 million tonnes of CO2
equivalent in 2040 from current levels of around 60 million, while the
government target is to bring emissions down to 30 million tonnes by 2050.

“The trend in net emissions is dominated by our projections of emissions
and removals from forestry,” the report said.

A large number of CO2-absorbing trees planted in the country in the 1990s
are set to be harvested at the end of this decade, meaning overall
emissions are likely to rise throughout the 2020s, it added.

Asked by the Green Party in parliament about the projections on Wednesday,
Simon Bridges, associate minister for climate change, said emissions were
projected to rise because of current low carbon prices in the country’s
Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS).

Critics have said New Zealand’s carbon market is too weak to incentivise
forest-planting, with carbon prices so low that foresters make more profit
chopping down trees to sell the timber.

“We know that as we make progress in international (climate change)
negotiations, that carbon price will surely rise,” Bridges said.

“The emissions trading scheme is a long-term tool, and it is not hard to
imagine that with a good outcome on a new global agreement and leadership
from the major economies, we will need to adjust our own domestic policy
response, as well.”

Domestic emissions permits in the New Zealand ETS currently trade at
NZ$3.75 ($3.15), but companies are also allowed to comply by buying
U.N.-backed carbon credits, which are available for only 30 cents each.

The New Zealand government last year removed legislation that would have
forced big companies to pay for a bigger share of their emissions and
restrict access to international credits - both moves that would have
driven up carbon prices.

It also put on hold indefinitely including in the scheme emissions from
agriculture, which accounts for nearly 50 per cent of New Zealand’s
emissions.

“It is policy incoherence of this breath-taking dimension that wins us
fossil awards at the U.N. conferences – with Warsaw beckoning next month,”
said Greens MP Kennedy Graham on his blog on Wednesday.

He was referring to the infamous prizes awarded by green groups at U.N.
climate negotiations to the countries they deem to be failing to act to
tackle climate change.

The main annual meeting takes place next month in Poland, where countries
will be tasked with making progress towards a 2015 global pact to bind all
nations into curbing emissions from 2020.

A spokesman for Climate Change Minister Tim Groser told Reuters on Thursday
that the government had no plans to reform the nation’s carbon market.

He said government will continue to fund research on greenhouse gases from
food production.

“The Government is investing $45 million into the Global Research Alliance
on Greenhouse Gases, bringing together 40 countries to find ways to grow
more food without growing greenhouse gas emissions,” he added
___
Sustainablelorgbiofuel mailing list
Sustainablelorgbiofuel@lists.sustainablelists.org
http://lists.eruditium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel


[Biofuel] Buyers unmoved by Sandy's reclaimed wood

2013-09-22 Thread Steve Racz
http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20130823/SMALLBIZ/130829952

Buyers unmoved by Sandy's reclaimed wood

Busted boardwalks and homes delivered tropical hardwoods and popular pine
to the reclamation market. But buyers are picky, and demolition crews know
one person's trash is another's gold.

BY JONATHAN BLUM
AUGUST 23, 2013 6:39 A.M.

Superstorm Sandy's swath of destruction shredded houses and boardwalks,
depositing a thicket of old timber onto the city's wood recycling market.
But making money from the newly available ancient timbers has proven to be
a grind.

We worked with the Parks Department initially on the boardwalk wood, said
Alan Solomon, partner at Sawkill Lumber, the Brooklyn-based reclaimed
lumber firm. We were able to save quite a bit of the tropical hardwood
there. But most of it was trashed. Overall, the market has been slow.

Firms that reclaim hardwood from city buildings and what could be saved
from Sandy are adapting to a market that has changed rapidly since
recycling old beams and boards came into the fore a decade or so ago, when
the wood was cheap to acquire and easy to sell to green-conscious
designers. The wood salvaged from Sandy has yet to translate into big
profits.

There was a time, five or 10 years ago, when trucks would pull up and just
ask to give us fabulous material, said Joseph Pepe, sales manager at M.
Fine Lumber, the Brooklyn-based lumber recycling and manufacturing firm.
The company would not disclose sales or revenues figures but said it's also
handling recycled Sandy material.

Now it's much more competitive, he said.

Bidding wars for trashed boards

The challenges salvage firms like M. Fine and Sawkill face begin with the
basics of procuring the material—that is, finding suitable material in old
buildings ready for demolition. Inventory in has been stubbornly lean since
the financial crash. There have been fewer transactions and construction
projects, and when buildings are dismantled, property owners and demolition
contractors are well-aware that their trash is another's gold.

We are bidding for every job against many other companies—that never used
to happen, said Larry Stopper, partner in Bigwood, the Naples, N.Y.-based
recycling firm that generates about a $1 million per year in sales of
reclaimed wood from deals done throughout Northeast, including pulling
material from the Brooklyn waterfront. And if you blow your estimates, you
are up the creek. You can very easily do a very large job for nothing.

Architects, interior designers and furniture makers have also become
increasingly selective about the species and quality of the material they
are willing to invest in, with each tree serving a niche.

Mr. Solomon said reclaimed yellow pine, the once predominant log in the
eastern U.S., sells for $5 per board foot. Oak and chestnut run $7.
Tropical hardwoods—found in the destroyed Rockaways boardwalk—sell for $10
to $20. European hardwoods imported for the city's original buildings sit
atop the market.

I have seen those go for $50 a foot, said Mr. Solomon.

Reclaimed hard wood is generally at least twice as expensive as boards
milled from timber forests. Companies buy the wood from demolition
contractor, then they must remove nails and other fasteners, mill, cut to
length, dry, and transport the finished wood to their customers. All of
which makes reclaimed lumber owners and managers choosy about which woods
they invest in. Bigwood's Mr. Stopper said the tropical hardwoods like
those found in the city's old boardwalks must compete with huge demand for
oak. Wood from Sandy also suffered damage from the sea. Some flood waters
contained fuel and other toxins.

It used to be we would try to turn everybody who came to us into a sale,
said Klaas Armster, partner in Sawkill Lumber. Eventually everything
sells, but now I have to be much more creative about which jobs we take.

In fact, the pricing pressure for reclaimed lumber has become so intense
that some local wood recyclers are giving up on sourcing material from the
New York metropolitan area.

The prices New York-sourced wood is asking are astronomical, said Vincent
Kaufmann, operations manager at LV Wood, a Manhattan-based reclaimed wood
retailer, whose eight employees handle 75,000 feet to 100,000 feet of wood
products monthly. I can get the exact same beams at a much more reasonable
price from dealers down south, he said. And the supply is much more
consistent.

Selling the story in the beams.

Eco-conscious customers value the story behind a boards: where it's from,
how old it is, and what the material was used for in its original life.
Bigwood handled the wood coming out of one of the first condom factories in
the U.S.

I don't know why, said Mr. Stopper, But it didn't matter what else I was
selling, everybody wanted a piece of the condom factory.

As compelling as Sandy's hurricane in one's house story might appear, its
tale has yet to translate into major sales.

When I consider the prospect for a 

[Biofuel] A New Deal for Appalachia’s Forests: Growing Biofuels?

2013-05-31 Thread Steve Racz
http://www.yesmagazine.org/new-economy/could-biofuels-mean-a-new-deal-for-appalachia-s-forests

A New Deal for Appalachia’s Forests: Growing Biofuels?

The mine-ravaged communities of Eastern Kentucky have been increasingly
abandoned by the coal economy. Could growing biofuels jumpstart a new local
jobs market—and renew the land in the process?


by Mark Andrew Boyer
posted May 31, 2013

Using valuable food crops like corn and sugar cane to produce biofuels has
been a highly controversial topic in the age of imminent food crises. But
nobody is growing corn on the former strip mines of Eastern Kentucky.

A look at the region on Google Earth shows a patchwork of bald spots in the
forested hills. Surface mining left its mark on the Appalachian landscape
through much of the 20th century, as large swaths of native forests were
replaced with sparse, scrubby grassland. But University of Kentucky
forestry professor Chris Barton sees in the compacted soil of old strip
mines the possibility of using former surface mine land for short-rotation
forestry—in order to produce fuel.

Here's how it would work: Fast-growing, native trees like black locust
could be grown and harvested every five to 10 years; then, the woodchips
would be burned in an oxygen-restricted condition to produce combustible
gases that in turn could be used to generate energy and heat. After a few
generations of short-rotation harvests, the land could be transitioned to a
long-term forest.

Barton is the founder of Green Forests Work, a nonprofit spin-off of the
Appalachian Regional Reforestation Initiative that seeks to reforest lands
scarred by mining with native trees—all the while helping to rebuild
struggling local economies.

These are what strip-mined hills look like. Photo courtesy of Gabe B.

A Conservation Corps for the 21st Century

When President Obama delivered his 2009 inauguration speech, he talked
about creating green jobs. A light bulb turned on for Barton. Realizing
that his reforestation initiative was a shovel-ready project that could
create jobs right away, Barton began thinking about approaching the federal
government for financial support.

Instead of depending on a single, monolithic employer to create jobs, Hall
would like to see people taking job creation into their own hands.

Surface mining strips away nutrient-rich topsoil and leaves a devastated
landscape that is prone to landslides and water contamination. With the
passage of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977, mining
companies were required to stabilize the land when they were finished
mining in order to control erosion. But instead of merely stabilizing,
mining companies over-compacted more than 1 million acres of former surface
mines using bulldozers. This made it difficult for anything other than
grasses and other non-native vegetation to grow.

This is an environment that had over 100 species of vegetation prior to
the mining, explains Barton. And when you get out on the sites and look
down, it's not like looking at your yard and seeing lush grass carpeting;
you're going to see very sparse grass, and a lot of patchiness. Now, if
Barton's plan works, he hopes to undo some of that damage.

In 2009, inspired partly by President Obama's speech, Barton wrote up a
proposal for putting an army of people to work by rehabilitating lands that
had been ravaged by industrial machinery. For inspiration, he looked to the
Civilian Conservation Corps, a New Deal program launched during the Great
Depression to create jobs for the unemployed in conservation and natural
resources development. Barton's proposal requested federal funding for
workers to till the land, grow trees in nurseries, plant trees, and manage
the land. But then, just days after Barton submitted his proposal, White
House green jobs czar Van Jones resigned, and the prospect of securing
funding for Green Forests Work (GFW) quickly dimmed.

For now, Barton has decided to move forward with volunteer labor, using the
next year and a half to try to educate the public and raise support for the
program. Since GFW was launched in 2008, more than 5,000 volunteers have
planted nearly 1 million trees on former surface mine sites. And last year,
the program received a $300,000 grant, enabling Barton to add a couple
full-time staff members.

Life after coal: New economy, new mentality

Coal jobs are increasingly hard to come by in Eastern Kentucky, as the rise
of cheap natural gas and waning Chinese demand have led to thousands of
layoffs in Appalachian coal towns. GFW's Reforestation Coordinator, Nathan
Hall, is a ninth-generation Appalachian who was born and raised in the
coalfields of Eastern Kentucky.

Part of Hall's job involves finding local contractors who can loosen up
soil that has been compacted by mining equipment so that native trees can
grow on reclaimed surface mine land.

By itself, short-rotation forestry might not have the ability to revive
local economies across Appalachian states, but 

[Biofuel] Group Kicks off Planting of Ancient Tree Clones

2013-04-24 Thread Steve Racz
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20130422/us-replanting-redwoods/?utm_hp_ref=politicsir=politics

By JOHN FLESHER AP Environmental Writer
COPEMISH, Mich. April 22, 2013 (AP)

A team led by a nurseryman from northern Michigan and his sons has raced
against time for two decades, snipping branches from some of the world's
biggest and most durable trees with plans to produce clones that could
restore ancient forests and help fight climate change.

Now comes the most ambitious phase of the quest: getting the new trees into
the ground.

Ceremonial plantings of two dozen clones from California's mighty coastal
redwoods were taking place Monday in seven nations: Australia, New Zealand,
Great Britain, Ireland, Canada, Germany and the U.S.

Although measuring just 18-inches tall, the laboratory-produced trees are
genetic duplicates of three giants that were cut down in northern
California more than a century ago. Remarkably, shoots still emerge from
the stumps, including one known as the Fieldbrook Stump near McKinleyville,
which measures 35 feet in diameter. It's believed to be about 4,000 years
old. The tree was about 40 stories high before it was felled.

This is a first step toward mass production, said David Milarch,
co-founder of Archangel Ancient Tree Archive, a nonprofit group
spearheading the project. We need to reforest the planet; it's imperative.
To do that, it just makes sense to use the largest, oldest, most iconic
trees that ever lived.

Milarch and his sons Jared and Jake, who have a family-owned nursery in the
village of Copemish, Mich., became concerned about the condition of the
world's forests in the 1990s. They began crisscrossing the U.S. in search
of champion trees that have lived hundreds or even thousands of years,
convinced that superior genes enabled them to outlast others of their
species. Scientific opinion varies on whether that's true, with skeptics
saying the survivors may simply have been lucky.

The Archangel leaders say they're out to prove the doubters wrong. They've
developed several methods of producing genetic copies from cuttings,
including placing branch tips less than an inch long in baby food jars
containing nutrients and hormones. The specimens are cultivated in labs
until large enough to be planted.

In recent years, they have focused on towering sequoias and redwoods,
considering them best suited to absorb massive volumes of carbon dioxide,
the greenhouse gas primarily responsible for climate change.

If we get enough of these trees out there, we'll make a difference, said
Jared Milarch, the group's executive director.

Archangel has an inventory of several thousand clones in various stages of
growth that were taken from more than 70 redwoods and giant sequoias. NASA
engineer Steve Craft, who helped arrange for David Milarch to address an
agency gathering, said research shows that those species hold much more
carbon than other varieties.

The challenge is to find places to put the trees, people to nurture them
and money to continue the project, Jared Milarch said. The group is funded
through donations and doesn't charge for its clones.

A lot of trees will be planted by a lot of groups on Arbor Day, but 90
percent of them will die, David Milarch said. It's a feel-good thing. You
can't plant trees and walk away and expect them to take care of themselves.

The recipients of Archangel redwoods have pledged to care for them
properly, he said. The first planting of about 250 took place in December
on a ranch near Port Orford, Ore. Others were being planted during Earth
Day observances Monday at the College of Marin in Kentwood, Calif., and in
parks and private estates in the other six countries.

I know the trees will thrive here, said Tom Burke, landscape manager at
the College of Marin. We've had redwoods in this area since God planted
them.

———

Online: http://www.ancienttreearchive.org
___
Sustainablelorgbiofuel mailing list
Sustainablelorgbiofuel@lists.sustainablelists.org
http://lists.eruditium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel


[Biofuel] Why Trees Matter

2013-04-09 Thread Steve Racz
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/12/opinion/why-trees-matter.html?_r=0

Why Trees Matter

By JIM ROBBINS

Published: April 11, 2012

Helena, Mont.

TREES are on the front lines of our changing climate. And when the oldest
trees in the world suddenly start dying, it’s time to pay attention.

North America’s ancient alpine bristlecone forests are falling victim to a
voracious beetle and an Asian fungus. In Texas, a prolonged drought killed
more than five million urban shade trees last year and an additional
half-billion trees in parks and forests. In the Amazon, two severe droughts
have killed billions more.

The common factor has been hotter, drier weather.

We have underestimated the importance of trees. They are not merely
pleasant sources of shade but a potentially major answer to some of our
most pressing environmental problems. We take them for granted, but they
are a near miracle. In a bit of natural alchemy called photosynthesis, for
example, trees turn one of the seemingly most insubstantial things of all —
sunlight — into food for insects, wildlife and people, and use it to create
shade, beauty and wood for fuel, furniture and homes.

For all of that, the unbroken forest that once covered much of the
continent is now shot through with holes.

Humans have cut down the biggest and best trees and left the runts behind.
What does that mean for the genetic fitness of our forests? No one knows
for sure, for trees and forests are poorly understood on almost all levels.
“It’s embarrassing how little we know,” one eminent redwood researcher told
me.

What we do know, however, suggests that what trees do is essential though
often not obvious. Decades ago, Katsuhiko Matsunaga, a marine chemist at
Hokkaido University in Japan, discovered that when tree leaves decompose,
they leach acids into the ocean that help fertilize plankton. When plankton
thrive, so does the rest of the food chain. In a campaign called Forests
Are Lovers of the Sea, fishermen have replanted forests along coasts and
rivers to bring back fish and oyster stocks. And they have returned.

Trees are nature’s water filters, capable of cleaning up the most toxic
wastes, including explosives, solvents and organic wastes, largely through
a dense community of microbes around the tree’s roots that clean water in
exchange for nutrients, a process known as phytoremediation. Tree leaves
also filter air pollution. A 2008 study by researchers at Columbia
University found that more trees in urban neighborhoods correlate with a
lower incidence of asthma.

In Japan, researchers have long studied what they call “forest bathing.” A
walk in the woods, they say, reduces the level of stress chemicals in the
body and increases natural killer cells in the immune system, which fight
tumors and viruses. Studies in inner cities show that anxiety, depression
and even crime are lower in a landscaped environment.

Trees also release vast clouds of beneficial chemicals. On a large scale,
some of these aerosols appear to help regulate the climate; others are
anti-bacterial, anti-fungal and anti-viral. We need to learn much more
about the role these chemicals play in nature. One of these substances,
taxane, from the Pacific yew tree, has become a powerful treatment for
breast and other cancers. Aspirin’s active ingredient comes from willows.

Trees are greatly underutilized as an eco-technology. “Working trees” could
absorb some of the excess phosphorus and nitrogen that run off farm fields
and help heal the dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico. In Africa, millions of
acres of parched land have been reclaimed through strategic tree growth.

Trees are also the planet’s heat shield. They keep the concrete and asphalt
of cities and suburbs 10 or more degrees cooler and protect our skin from
the sun’s harsh UV rays. The Texas Department of Forestry has estimated
that the die-off of shade trees will cost Texans hundreds of millions of
dollars more for air-conditioning. Trees, of course, sequester carbon
dioxide, a greenhouse gas that makes the planet warmer. A study by the
Carnegie Institution for Science also found that water vapor from forests
lowers ambient temperatures.

A big question is, which trees should we be planting? Ten years ago, I met
a shade tree farmer named David Milarch, a co-founder of the Champion Tree
Project who has been cloning some of the world’s oldest and largest trees
to protect their genetics, from California redwoods to the oaks of Ireland.
“These are the supertrees, and they have stood the test of time,” he says.

Science doesn’t know if these genes will be important on a warmer planet,
but an old proverb seems apt. “When is the best time to plant a tree?” The
answer: “Twenty years ago. The second-best time? Today.”

Jim Robbins is the author of the forthcoming book “The Man Who Planted
Trees.”

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: April 21, 2012

An earlier version of this essay referred incorrectly to one of 

[Biofuel] Climate-change summary and update

2013-03-04 Thread Steve Racz
http://guymcpherson.com/2013/01/climate-change-summary-and-update/


Climate-change summary and
updatehttp://guymcpherson.com/2013/01/climate-change-summary-and-update/

Sun, Jan 6, 2013

Uncategorized http://guymcpherson.com/category/uncategorized/

American actress Lily Tomlin is credited with the expression, “No matter
how cynical you become, it’s never enough to keep up.” With respect to
climate science, my own efforts to stay abreast are blown away every week
by new data, models, and assessments. It seems no matter how dire the
situation becomes, it only gets worse when I check the latest reports.

The response of politicians, heads of non-governmental organizations, and
corporate leaders remains the same. They’re mired in the dank Swamp of
Nothingness. These are the people who know about, and presumably could do
something about, our ongoing race to disaster (if only to sound the alarm).
Tomlin’s line is never more germane than when thinking about their pursuit
of a buck at the expense of life on Earth.

This essay brings attention to recent projections and positive feedbacks.
There is little new here beyond my recent presentations on the subject.
Specifically, I presented most of this information at the Bluegrass
Bioneers 
conferencehttp://guymcpherson.com/2012/11/speaking-in-louisville-and-a-couple-essays/
(Alex
Smith at Radio Ecoshock evaluates my
presentationherehttp://ecoshock.blogspot.com/2012/12/climate-on-road-to-extinction.html).
More recently, I presented an updated
versionhttp://guymcpherson.com/2012/11/livestreamed-tonight/ on
the campus of the University of Massachusetts. All information and sources
are readily confirmed with an online search, and links to information about
feedbacks can be found
herehttp://lackofenvironment.wordpress.com/2013/02/19/what-on-earth-are-we-doing/
.

*Large-scale assessments*

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (late 2007): 1 C by 2100

Hadley Centre for Meteorological Research (late 2008): 2 C by 2100

United Nations Environment Programme (mid 2009): 3.5 C by 2100

Hadley Centre for Meteorological Research (October 2009): 4 C by 2060

Global Carbon Project, Copenhagen Diagnosis (November 2009): 6 C, 7 C by
2100

International Energy Agency (November 2010): 3.5 C by 2035 2100

United Nations Environment Programme (December 2010): up to 5 C by 2050

These assessments fail to account for significant self-reinforcing feedback
loops (i.e., positive feedbacks, the term that implies the opposite of its
meaning). The IPCC’s vaunted Fifth Assessment will continue the trend as
it, too, ignores important
feedbackshttp://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/12/02/1253931/ipccs-planned-obsolescence-fifth-assessment-report-will-ignore-crucial-permafrost-carbon-feedback/.
On a positive note, major assessments fail to account for economic
collapse. However, due to the feedback loops presented below, I strongly
suspect it’s too late for economic collapse to extend the run of our
species.

As pointed out by the United Nations Advisory Group on Greenhouse Gases in
1990http://theartofannihilation.com/category/articles-2010/expose-the-2o-death-dance-the-1o-cover-up-part-i/,
“Beyond 1 degree C may elicit rapid, unpredictable and non-linear responses
that could lead to extensive ecosystem damage.” Planetary instruments
indicate Earth has warmed about 1 C since the beginning of the industrial
revolution. However, plants in the vicinity of Concord, Massachusetts —
where the instrumental record indicates warming of about 1 C — indicate warming
of 2.4 C since the
1840shttp://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2012/mar/14/henry-david-thoreau-climate-change
.

Whether you believe the plants or the instruments is irrelevant at the
point. We’ve clearly triggered the types of positive feedbacks the United
Nations warned about in 1990. Yet my colleagues and acquaintances think we
can and will work our way out of this horrific mess with permaculture
(which is not to denigrate permaculture, the principles of which are
implemented at the mud hut).

Let’s ignore the models for a moment and consider only the results of a single
briefing to the United Nations Conference of the Parties in Copenhagen
(COP15)http://wrongkindofgreen.org/2012/12/10/the-most-important-cop-briefing-that-no-one-ever-heard-truth-lies-racism-omnicide/.
Regulars in this space will recall COP15 as the climate-change meetings
thrown under the bus by the Obama administration. A footnote on that
long-forgotten briefing contains this statement: “THE LONG-TERM SEA LEVEL
THAT CORRESPONDS TO CURRENT CO2 CONCENTRATION IS ABOUT 23 METERS ABOVE
TODAY’S LEVELS, AND THE TEMPERATURES WILL BE 6 DEGREES C OR MORE HIGHER.
THESE ESTIMATES ARE BASED ON REAL LONG TERM CLIMATE RECORDS, NOT ON MODELS.”

In other words, Obama and others in his administration knew near-term
extinction of humans was already guaranteed. Even before the dire feedbacks
were reported by the scientific community, the Obama administration
abandoned climate change as a 

Re: [Biofuel] India's gift to green drive: Bicycle @ 40kmph

2008-08-14 Thread Steve Moran
Shimano used to have something called the biopace chainring.  The chainrings 
where oblong, so that you would get a more powerful downstroke.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biopace



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Worthy
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 9:17 AM
To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] India's gift to green drive: Bicycle @ 40kmph


For a bit more detail..

http://www.indiainnovates.in/Medalists2008.pdf

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:24 AM, MH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 This I'd like to read more about.  Can someone help me?  -Hoagy

 ---

 India's gift to green drive: Bicycle @ 40kmph
 2 Aug, 2008, 2045 hrs IST,Moinak Mitra, ET Bureau

 http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Indias_gift_to_green_drive_Bicycle__40kmph/articleshow/3319246.cms

 NEW DELHI: India could soon take pride for reinventing the wheel and
 leading
 the global green movement! An innovation by a senior administrator at
 IIT-Kharagpur is helping him ride the humble bicycle at 40 km an hour and
 pedalling past motor vehicles on busy roads without much effort. And you
 could be next - cycle manufacturers are planning to launch these hot wheels
 commercially, very soon.

 Manoj Mondal is the inventor of the crank pedal-he successfully tweaked the
 pedal of a bicycle to an extent that it generates almost double the torque
 (force multiplied by the distance from the centre) than in normal
 circumstances . In other words, the speed of the bicycle increases from,
 say, 20 km/hr to 40 km/hr.

 His feat has already made him the toast of incubators , the green lobby and
 a host of companies which are coming forward to adapt Mondal's technology
 commercially. While the invention ushers in revolutionary intra-city
 commute, it cocks a snook at the fuel brigade as the inventor apprehends
 auto majors may just gang up to disembark his plans.

 I want to first launch the product in the ladies' and sports bicycle
 categories since speed is critical here, says Mondal, who has initiated
 talks with cycle brands like Atlas, TI Cycles and Hero. There's more.
 Tweaking the pedal to generate more torque can create 700 watts of
 electricity per unit, says Mondal.

 Now that's enough to light up 10 neons. Next, he's working on a prototype
 where pedalling on a stationary cycle has the potential to dig a bore deep
 enough to make a drain, and construction major Escorts seems to have shown
 interest in the new technology, says Mondal. Besides, Mondal's invention is
 slated to benefit rickshaw-pullers as the Centre for Rural Development has
 shown keenness to convert 10,000 rickshaws into the crank pedal mode this
 year.

 Though power companies haven't lined up yet, bicycle makers seem to have
 grasped the next wave. I'm awaiting the final prototype (from Mondal) and
 then intend to take it to the dealers en route the market, says R K Kapur,
 chief general manager of technology at Atlas Cycles. Vasant Devaji of TI
 Cycles claims that a meeting with Mondal is scheduled next month to take
 the
 project forward.

 For the time being , the marketing muscle is being provided by the Lockheed
 Martin India Innovation Growth Programme that was launched in March last
 year jointly by Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry
 (Ficci) and the IC2 Institute of the University of Texas. This year,
 Mondal's crank pedal won the silver at the Lockheed Martin India Innovation
 Growth Programme.

 We are helping Mondal to tie up with the Hero Group and are also in touch
 with the Ministry of Rural Development to roll out his invention, says
 Nirankar Saxena, additional director at Ficci. As stewardship of the
 environment takes on an ever-increasing importance for the global
 community,
 we have seen great promise for such inventions to increase energy
 efficiency, save precious resources, and reduce pollution, says Ray O.
 Johnson , CTO of Lockheed Martin.


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/




--
Regards, Jim
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20080813/9ef9f8a1/attachment.html
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org

Re: [Biofuel] The food emergency and food myths

2008-06-30 Thread Steve Moran
Don't farmers have the right to sell their corn to whoever they want to
sell it too?  Even if corn is going to make ethanol, so?  So the world
has increased its demand for oil, and that means that oil costs more,
that means that we need to find ways to offset that, so we make corn
into ethanol, and now corn costs more.  Maybe if the oil producing
countries of the world didn't need indoor skiing and rotating towers(see
Dubai), and such a large profit margin, then we would have gone along
consuming just like we had been.  Oil costs around $1-$15 to produce a
barrel.  It's sold at $143 a barrel.  Someone's making a helluva profit
in there.  Even barring the fact that some of this corn is being
diverted to other uses, it costs more to produce it when diesel goes up.
Those tractors don't run on water.  



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Chip Mefford
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 12:14 PM
To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] The food emergency and food myths


Keith Addison wrote:
 http://www.grain.org/seedling/?id=552
 
 Seedling   July 2008
 
 The food emergency and food myths
 
 Why Bush is wrong to blame Indians for the rise in food prices
 
 Vandana Shiva *

I really enjoy Vandana Shiva's input. It's clueful and very well
thought out.

That said;


 SNIP
 agribusiness in the current food crisis, both through speculation and 
 through the hijacking of food into biofuels, 


I keep hearing about this 'hijacking of food into biofuels' argument.

Anyone have the numbers to back this up?

The increased 'demand' for ethanol in the US, is at least partially
due to the gigantic surpluses of 'feed corn' over the last decade.
That corn is only food in an abstract sense, it's mostly all starch,
not edible directly. I'm sure this year the corn yields will be down,
no doubt. But somehow, I don't see the correlation.



-- 
Chip Mefford

Before Enlightenment;
chop wood
carry water
After Enlightenment;
chop wood
carry water
-
Public Key
http://www.well.com/user/cpm

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000
messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


[Biofuel] soap titration

2008-06-20 Thread Steve Moran
I don't think I've seen anything on this aspect, and as I'm kind of new
to make BD, I don' t know if knowing how much soap you're producing
would help correct the problem or not, but the place I get my
isopropanol from has a link now mentioning soap titration, so I thought
I'd share.

 

http://www.sciencecompany.com/biodiesel/index.htm

 

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20080620/616b0951/attachment.html 
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


Re: [Biofuel] WVO in PA, USA

2008-06-19 Thread Steve Moran
Maybe he's working with a group of guys to make it.  Maybe he owns a
delivery truck.  Maybe he owns a company that has 12 trucks in its
fleet.  Maybe he has a hole in his storage tank.  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Keith Addison
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 12:47 PM
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] WVO in PA, USA


Keith Addison wrote:
  I'm having a hard time finding WVO.  I need 500 Gallons per month
and
  I'm tired of driving around and fighting for oil at every
restaurant
  within 10 miles.  I've found other companies in other states that
sell
  and deliver larger quantities but nothing close to home.  I'm just
  outside of Philadelphia - has anyone heard or run into such an
animal.
  Thanks,
  Roger

  Why do you need so much oil? That should be enough for 12 people.

This is the US Keith :)

Yes, Chip, I know. :-)

But it just doesn't wash.

I also come from a big country, not that big, but big enough, so I 
know something about it. I quite often used to drive 1,000 miles each 
way for the weekend, or 400 each way for a different weekend. In an 
850cc Mini, foot flat all the way at 80 mph, and not very much gas 
used. (I'm not small, 6ft 2in.)

Japan's a big country too, in its way, narrow but long. Where you 
guys need a 6.8 litre F250 truck the Japanese use little 660cc 
K-trucks, for just about everything, very economical, tough and 
capable. Good 4x4 too, not easy to get stuck in a K-truck. They're 
real trucks, but miniaturised, not made-over cars. I don't think 
Japan would work very well without its K-trucks, I can see it sort of 
slowly grinding to a halt. There are K-cars too, all the K-vehicles 
have low taxes to encourage people to buy them. I wonder if your 
F250s accomplish that much more work than Japan's K-trucks do (let 
alone 10 times as much work, since they're 10 times as big), and what 
the real costs might be per unit of work accomplished in each case, 
or some such efficiency comparison. I've no idea where to find such 
data, if anywhere, but it might be a surprise.

Anyway, the cases you describe don't seem to be typical for the US, 
according to these stats, source U.S. Department of Transportation:
Average annual fuel consumed per vehicle (gallons) - Passenger car -
2005: 541
Average miles traveled per vehicle (thousands) - Passenger car: 12.4
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0004727.html

That's about what I thought, 12,000 miles a year, 500 gallons. So 
yes, Roger's 500 gallons a month should be enough for 12 people.

I don't know, but I don't think he's in the same situation as you. He 
says he's just outside Philadelphia, he said before he works for a 
laboratory surplus equipment company, in Philadelphia I guess, though 
maybe not. So why does he need so much fuel?

Interesting numbers at that infoplease page.

Number of passenger cars registered
1960: 61,671,000
2005: 135,568,000

Did the US get twice as big in the meantime? No:

Vehicle-miles traveled - Passenger car
1960: 587,000,000
2005: 1,689,965,000

It got three times as big! LOL!

Sorry.

snip

But still I see no real changes, just individual disasters.

That's the problem eh? Ordinary people, the real ones, get hurt 
first, and the toy people don't feel a thing.

I suppose long-haul will go by train, or not at all, trucks will be 
for local. Hm. The Japanese don't export the K-vehicles, but I think 
you can get second-hand K-trucks in the US now. Maybe some of your 
trucker friends might be interested in this:

http://www.best-used-tractors.com/mini_truck.html
Used Japanese 4X4 K-class Mini Trucks, Micro Trucks - US and Canada

The Japanese have been making right hand drive light duty trucks 
for decades which Best Used Tractors can now import used in 
containers to the US, to Canada, and to many other countries around 
the globe.

Bit of money to be made there, I think. Could even be trendy, sort of 
an anti-Hummer.

Best

Keith


Lemme see, 500 gal of svo, could yield 500 gals of bd, for
a 30 day month, that's ~17 gallons a day, in my F-250,
that get's 16-20mpg,if I drive it really gently, that's 300 miles
a day, but that's every day. Since I live 127 miles from where
I work, I could *almost* burn that much. However, I don't commute,
I only go home on the weekends, and I don't drive the truck :)

Some folks will boggle at that. But around here, it's not as
far-fetched as one might -at first blush- think.

Of the 80-some-odd folks that I work with, more than half of them
commute more than 50 miles a day, some more than 75. A few
well over 100.

I personally drive just a bit over 70 miles a day on average.
On the road, I see vehicles coming in from much farther out
that are gigantic fuel burners. These are daily commuters,
2.5 to 5ton class diesel trucks close to fully loaded with
welders, etc. that probably log well over 200 miles a day,
and I'm sure they don't get anything like 15-20 mpg.

So, yeah, I can see how some folks, 

Re: [Biofuel] WVO in PA, USA

2008-06-19 Thread Steve Moran
Ya just never know ;)
This is almost as intriguing a mystery as all those feet washing up in
canada.   

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Keith Addison
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 1:03 PM
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] WVO in PA, USA


Maybe he's working with a group of guys to make it.  Maybe he owns a
delivery truck.  Maybe he owns a company that has 12 trucks in its
fleet.  Maybe he has a hole in his storage tank.

Maybe he'll tell us himself.

Keith


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Keith Addison
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 12:47 PM
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] WVO in PA, USA


Keith Addison wrote:
   I'm having a hard time finding WVO.  I need 500 Gallons per month
and
   I'm tired of driving around and fighting for oil at every
restaurant
   within 10 miles.  I've found other companies in other states that
sell
   and deliver larger quantities but nothing close to home.  I'm
just
   outside of Philadelphia - has anyone heard or run into such an
animal.
   Thanks,
   Roger

   Why do you need so much oil? That should be enough for 12 people.

This is the US Keith :)

Yes, Chip, I know. :-)

But it just doesn't wash.

snip

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000
messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


Re: [Biofuel] biodiesel test batch question

2008-04-29 Thread Steve Moran
I've gotten one to pass a wash test, but I stopped with test batches
until I get a more accurate scale.  Its too hit or miss with the scale I
have now.  I use a drill with a hollow-wall molly anchor as a stirrer
and use a piece of Velcro strap to keep the drill moving at a low speed.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Thomas Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 5:36 AM
To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] biodiesel test batch question

Steve,
 Have your test batches passed the quality test?

I do my test batches in a pot on a coleman stove out in the garage so I
 can maintain the temp.

 How do you agitate the mix?
 Is the processor an open pot?
   Tom

- Original Message - 
From: Steve Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org; 
biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] biodiesel test batch question


I do my test batches in a pot on a coleman stove out in the garage so I
 can maintain the temp.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
 Of mike
 Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 1:58 PM
 To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Subject: [Biofuel] biodiesel test batch question

 Hello everyone, my first post

 i want to apologize if this has been answered, but I have searched the
 archives and relevant sites without finding a clear answer.

 I've been reading the j2f howto for doing my first test batch with
 unused veg oil and a blender. I see that I'm suppose to pre-heat the
oil

 before starting the process to 130 deg F, but everything else i read
 says I need to maintain that temperature which isn't possible without
 moving the oil back to another container that can be heated so I
 guess basically i'm asking, is that temp (130) required for the
reaction

 or does it just aid in a faster reaction.

 Thanks
 Mike


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000
messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


Re: [Biofuel] biodiesel test batch question

2008-04-28 Thread Steve Moran
I think (but I'm not sure) that methanol will evaporate at 140, is that 
correct?  If it is, then keeping the temp below that would become very 
important too.



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Thomas Kelly
Sent: Mon 4/28/2008 6:39 PM
To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] biodiesel test batch question



Mike,
 Test batches can be difficult  ..  well worth the effort.
 Blenders provide excellent agitation, but it is difficult to maintain
the proper temp.
 PET bottles allow one to maintain temp better, but agitation may be
inadequate.

 It is important to maintain temp even if you must interupt agitation.
Suggestion:  Achieve the temp of 130F, blend for 5 minutes, check temp
   If necessary, carefully return the liquid to a container
to be heated.
   Return to blender and repeat 2 (3?) more times

 I use a hot water bath for heating the mix. Do you have a pot big
enough to fit the blender pitcher into? The pot would contain hot (~150F)
water. Instead of pouring the hot mix back and forth you could simply place
the pitcher from the blender, with top on, into the hot water bath to
re-establish the 130F, blot dry and buzz it again.

 I have returned to doing some test batches. I favor heating the mix in
a PET bottle that has a wide mouth with a twist open/close top. Sport drink
plastic bottles often have this feature. This allows me to limit methanol
evaporation while heating the mix. I either twist the top to open while
heating or I squeeze the bottle to decrease volume of air before closing and
heating. The wide mouth and a funnel make it easy to add the liquid. I heat
the mix in a hot water bath.

   Good Luck,
Tom


- Original Message -
From: mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 3:57 PM
Subject: [Biofuel] biodiesel test batch question


 Hello everyone, my first post

 i want to apologize if this has been answered, but I have searched the
 archives and relevant sites without finding a clear answer.

 I've been reading the j2f howto for doing my first test batch with
 unused veg oil and a blender. I see that I'm suppose to pre-heat the oil
 before starting the process to 130 deg F, but everything else i read
 says I need to maintain that temperature which isn't possible without
 moving the oil back to another container that can be heated so I
 guess basically i'm asking, is that temp (130) required for the reaction
 or does it just aid in a faster reaction.

 Thanks
 Mike


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/




___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


Re: [Biofuel] biodiesel test batch question

2008-04-28 Thread Steve Moran
I do my test batches in a pot on a coleman stove out in the garage so I
can maintain the temp.  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of mike
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 1:58 PM
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: [Biofuel] biodiesel test batch question

Hello everyone, my first post

i want to apologize if this has been answered, but I have searched the 
archives and relevant sites without finding a clear answer.

I've been reading the j2f howto for doing my first test batch with 
unused veg oil and a blender. I see that I'm suppose to pre-heat the oil

before starting the process to 130 deg F, but everything else i read 
says I need to maintain that temperature which isn't possible without 
moving the oil back to another container that can be heated so I 
guess basically i'm asking, is that temp (130) required for the reaction

or does it just aid in a faster reaction.

Thanks
Mike


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000
messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


Re: [Biofuel] american Trucks

2008-04-28 Thread Steve Moran
I've also heard that the powerstroke is hit or miss.  Anything after
2003 is going to be a lot quieter than the old diesels, there were some
new federal requirements imposed in 2003 about noise levels.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Zeke Yewdall
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 2:33 PM
To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] american Trucks

Most of the diesel mechanic's I've talked to only recommend the
cummins engines, which means the dodge trucks, or the F550 and larger
Fords.  They also don't recommend using biodiesel, for the most
part   As far as running on biodiesel, I think that just about all
of the older ones are compatible -- only the very newest ones with the
high pressure common rail systems have reported any problems that I am
aware of.  The new ones are very nice though... I have a friend with a
2008 Ram 3500, and it barely sounds like a diesel any more, and has
enormous amounts of torque (it slows down a bit coming up the last
hill to my house when pulling the tandem axle trailer fully loaded
firewood or a skidsteer or such... but that same hill easily drops my
old car into 2nd gear too.).  The very old ones are the best if
you want to do SVO since they're not as picky on fuel... I know there
are particular years and pumps that handle it better than others, but
I don't have the experience to know for sure.  In Canada, I'd
recommend a two tank SVO type system just to run biodiesel... just
here in Colorado I have to switch to B20 in the winter or I get
gelling pretty bad (mitsubishi pickup) at temps below 25F (which is
often the high temp for the day)

Z

On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Fritz Friesinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi all,
  a friend of mine wants to buy a 250 Pickup to pull a 5.whealer
trailer
  What model should he look for to be able to run on BD.We think to
look for a 2tank system.Up here in Canada we have very cold winters
  Thanks for your help
  Fritz
  -- next part --
  An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
  URL: /pipermail/attachments/20080428/e4c0a8af/attachment.html
  ___
  Biofuel mailing list
  Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
  http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

  Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000
messages):
  http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000
messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


 

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


Re: [Biofuel] We Need To Solve The Oil Crisis--Now

2008-04-24 Thread Steve Moran
Speed limits should not be set at the national level, it's a state or
municipal issue.  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Brian Schneider
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:26 AM
To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] We Need To Solve The Oil Crisis--Now

So then what would be the suggestion?  Sometimes laws are necessary  
to help or protect those who can't or won't do it them selves.
If on a national level if lowering the speed limit 10 to 15 mph would  
help decrease our dependance on foreign oil or any oil for that  
matter then it should be addressed regardless of how popular or  
unpopular it is.
Granted there are some laws that are nonsense, but they are necessary  
because without most of them there would be utter chaos.
Brian
On Apr 24, 2008, at 1:16 PM, Chip Mefford wrote:

 Brian Schneider wrote:
 Hello,
 Just a comment, why don't we in the US do something else that was
 done in the 70's oil crisis...drop the speed limit back to 55.

 There were a *lot* of problems with this. I'm not going to
 go into it all, in fact, I'm barely going to scratch the
 surface. But essentially, the nationwide 55mph speed limit
 was about as popular as prohibition, and caused many of
 the same problems.

 In interest of full disclosure,
 when ever I hear 'There ought to be a law,
 I duck.

 We have plenty of laws. a few orders of magnitude
 too many I'd say. In fact, I'd point to the
 current state of affairs as my primary exhibit
 in the 'laws don't fix anything' presentation.


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000  
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000
messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


Re: [Biofuel] We Need To Solve The Oil Crisis--Now

2008-04-24 Thread Steve Moran
 More laws don't fix a damn thing - look at the 'War on Drugs' or 
Washington DC where handgun ownership is illegal and the crime is the 
worst in the country.

Even more disgusting is how laws are enforced, in Denver, Co, they have
a concealed weapons ban, which conflicts with the state that allows for
concealed weapons, the state has sued the city over it, yet Denver
enforces this city law.  The city also has legalized possession of less
than an ounce of marijuana, and passed a second law that makes marijuana
the lowest priority of law enforcement, yet arrests for possession are
up, how can that be?  The denver police enforce the State law, banning
it.  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Roger
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:28 AM
To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] We Need To Solve The Oil Crisis--Now

I was going to say the same.  Not sure on how to do it, but it's going 
to take a full-fledged attitude change from everyone - not more 
legislation.  How do you convince an entire nation that, for the good of

the country and oneself, not to buy the Hummer, to car-pool, stop eating

GM foods, and avoid high-fructose corn syrup.  The argument continues to

school shootings, drugs, etc.  When did these things become OK? 

More laws don't fix a damn thing - look at the 'War on Drugs' or 
Washington DC where handgun ownership is illegal and the crime is the 
worst in the country.

Chip Mefford wrote:
 Brian Schneider wrote:
   
 Hello,
 Just a comment, why don't we in the US do something else that was  
 done in the 70's oil crisis...drop the speed limit back to 55.
 

 There were a *lot* of problems with this. I'm not going to
 go into it all, in fact, I'm barely going to scratch the
 surface. But essentially, the nationwide 55mph speed limit
 was about as popular as prohibition, and caused many of
 the same problems.

 In interest of full disclosure,
 when ever I hear 'There ought to be a law,
 I duck.

 We have plenty of laws. a few orders of magnitude
 too many I'd say. In fact, I'd point to the
 current state of affairs as my primary exhibit
 in the 'laws don't fix anything' presentation.


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000
messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


   
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20080424/eda842c3/attachment.html 
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000
messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


Re: [Biofuel] We Need To Solve The Oil Crisis--Now

2008-04-24 Thread Steve Moran
well, if the ice age is coming, then maybe we all need hummers and big trucks 
to create more green house gasses ;)
 
55 is fine for the densely populate tracts of america (the coasts), but its 
going to be a rea hard sell in the vast expanses of the middle of the 
country.  The federal government is good at the one size fits most things, but 
that never fits all, and while 55 may actually save fuel and reduce polution, 
you try selling that on i-80 when you're driving a 1000 miles through the 
middle of no-where.  again, I say this is a state issue, not federal, maybe we 
cut all the 75mph zones to 65, and 65 to 55, but 55 across the board probably 
won't fly. 
Not that I'm worried it would, its political suicide to try pass it again, and 
we all know that politicians don't do anything that would jeopardize thier 
careers.  
 
Instead, maybe what we ought to do is make things like cat-back exhaust system 
and cold air intake systems that make pretty much any vehicle get another 2-4 
mpg mandatory.  The nice thing about that is that it would only affect the 
prices of new cars, which are not mandatory purchases anyway, and will only 
affect those that choose to buy them.  



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Chris Burck
Sent: Thu 4/24/2008 6:40 PM
To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] We Need To Solve The Oil Crisis--Now



laws definitely do matter.  just because there are a lot of stupid
laws, that's no reason to discourage or oppose sensible ones.  there's
nothing wrong with a 55mph speed limit.  did people ignore it? sure.
did most people ignore it?  not a chance.  people violate the speed
limit more now than ever.

On 4/24/08, Brian Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Interesting conversation.  We all agree that the one thing that needs
 to happen is a change in attitude of people about fuel use or fuel
 conservation.  I am afraid that we are living in a country that has
 had it too easy too long and no one is going to change anything (or
 should I say most) until they are forced to.  I know that not many
 people obey the speed limit and changing it would not make much of a
 difference, I will concede that fact, but will they be willing to
 make other changes on their own without any external influence?  More
 than likely not, most do not like the inconvenience of doing things
 differently.  I am a public school teacher in a rural area.  I see
 the kids attitudes about certain things and most of them are not what
 I would consider to be old enough to have a firm grasp on their
 opinions, so most of them hear things at home and that becomes what
 they believe.  Truly it concerns me with their attitudes.  They don't
 want anyone telling them what to do or how to do anything.  They
 don't value education for the most part and think that their time
 spent in high school is a big waste of their time.
 I know first hand what it can be to try to get them to change on even
 the smallest of ideas, so when we start mentioning that they should
 drive smaller cars and etc, they will not be for that at all.
 The only thing that is going to change the mind of many people is
 when we feel the effects of what we are doing.  Then and only then
 will change precipitate out and people be concerned about what they
 are doing.

 To me it is a sad commentary on our lives in this country.  Most
 think that the only person that matters is me

 Brian
 On Apr 24, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Chip Mefford wrote:

  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
  Hash: SHA1
 
  Kirk McLoren wrote:
  | I am in favor of new laws - only if you recind an old one. There are
  so many laws now the only way you know you are breaking one is if they
  pinch you.
  |   Kirk
 
  Lol!
 
  I'd say rescind at least 100 old per 1 new.
  Actually should 1000, so you'd counter
  with 10, so we could get to 100.
 
  :)
 
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
  Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
  Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org 
  http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ 
 
  iD8DBQFIENUzlwL/NsEHg6sRAjwvAJ0e0cyu0I2LPDbpl25AGnfvysjvSQCgwCer
  oO9aIdXAlBD3Q039A2wDTN4=
  =ywh0
  -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
  ___
  Biofuel mailing list
  Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
  http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel
 
  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
  Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000
  messages):
  http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Food Rationing in America?

2008-04-22 Thread Steve Moran
gee, and we're still paying farmers to leave thier feilds sit?  I live in 
colorado, and I have freinds that bought farms solely because the government 
pays them to not grow.  Great investment, getting paid to sit on your butt.  
seems to me that if the shortage was really that bad, we'd stop wasting tax 
dollars on this sort of thing.  



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of robert and benita
Sent: Tue 4/22/2008 6:18 PM
To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: [Biofuel] Food Rationing in America?



http://www2.nysun.com/article/74994


  Food Rationing Confronts Breadbasket of the World

By JOSH GERSTEIN http://www2.nysun.com/authors/Josh+Gerstein
Staff Reporter of the Sun
April 21, 2008


MOUNTAIN VIEW
http://www2.nysun.com/related_results.php?term=Mountain+View, Calif.
http://www2.nysun.com/related_results.php?term=California -- Many
parts of America
http://www2.nysun.com/related_results.php?term=United+States, long
considered the breadbasket of the world, are now confronting a once
unthinkable phenomenon: food rationing. Major retailers in New York, in
areas of New England
http://www2.nysun.com/related_results.php?term=New+England+States, and
on the West Coast are limiting purchases of flour, rice, and cooking oil
as demand outstrips supply. There are also anecdotal reports that some
consumers are hoarding grain stocks.

At a Costco
http://www2.nysun.com/related_results.php?term=Costco+Wholesale+Corporation
Warehouse in Mountain View, Calif.
http://www2.nysun.com/related_results.php?term=Mountain+View+%28California%29,
yesterday, shoppers grew frustrated and occasionally uttered expletives
as they searched in vain for the large sacks of rice they usually buy.

Where's the rice? an engineer from Palo Alto
http://www2.nysun.com/related_results.php?term=Palo+Alto, Calif.,
Yajun Liu, said. You should be able to buy something like rice. This is
ridiculous.

The bustling store in the heart of Silicon Valley usually sells four or
five varieties of rice to a clientele largely of Asian immigrants, but
only about half a pallet of Indian-grown Basmati rice was left in stock.
A 20-pound bag was selling for $15.99.

You can't eat this every day. It's too heavy, a health care executive
from Palo Alto, Sharad Patel, grumbled as his son loaded two sacks of
the Basmati into a shopping cart. We only need one bag but I'm getting
two in case a neighbor or a friend needs it, the elder man said.

The Patels seemed headed for disappointment, as most Costco members were
being allowed to buy only one bag. Moments earlier, a clerk dropped two
sacks back on the stack after taking them from another customer who
tried to exceed the one-bag cap.

Due to the limited availability of rice, we are limiting rice purchases
based on your prior purchasing history, a sign above the dwindling
supply said.

Shoppers said the limits had been in place for a few days, and that rice
supplies had been spotty for a few weeks. A store manager referred
questions to officials at Costco headquarters near Seattle, who did not
return calls or e-mail messages yesterday.

An employee at the Costco store in Queens said there were no
restrictions on rice buying, but limits were being imposed on purchases
of oil and flour. Internet postings attributed some of the shortage at
the retail level to bakery owners who flocked to warehouse stores when
the price of flour from commercial suppliers doubled.

The curbs and shortages are being tracked with concern by survivalists
who view the phenomenon as a harbinger of more serious trouble to come.

It's sporadic. It's not every store, but it's becoming more
commonplace, the editor of SurvivalBlog.com, James Rawles, said. The
number of reports I've been getting from readers who have seen signs
posted with limits has increased almost exponentially, I'd say in the
last three to five weeks.

Spiking food prices have led to riots in recent weeks in Haiti,
Indonesia, and several African nations. India recently banned export of
all but the highest quality rice, and Vietnam blocked the signing of a
new contract for foreign rice sales.

I'm surprised the Bush administration hasn't slapped export controls on
wheat, Mr. Rawles said. The Asian countries are here buying every kind
of wheat. Mr. Rawles said it is hard to know how much of the shortages
are due to lagging supply and how much is caused by consumers hedging
against future price hikes or a total lack of product.

There have been so many stories about worldwide shortages that it
encourages people to stock up. What most people don't realize is that
supply chains have changed, so inventories are very short, Mr. Rawles,
a former Army intelligence officer, said. Even if people increased
their purchasing by 20%, all the store shelves would be wiped out.

At the moment, large chain retailers seem more prone to shortages and
limits than do smaller chains and mom-and-pop stores, perhaps because
store managers at the larger 

Re: [Biofuel] Message In A Bottle

2008-04-19 Thread Steve Moran
They use something like that in the balitmore harbor.  a smallish boat with a 
conveyor belt in the center and two arms that scissor horizontally across the 
top of the water and have conveyor type belts on them that pull the garbage 
toward the center belt.  The boat floats on pontoons on the ouside of the 
conveyer and it has a bin type thing at the back of it.  The garbage is 
escorted by the arms toward the central belt, which picks it up and dumps it 
into the bin, the water just falls through the belt.  



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Jason Mier
Sent: Sat 4/19/2008 7:29 AM
To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Message In A Bottle





nets can only pick up so much. i have an idea but it sounds kind of outlandish.

i am imagining a fleet of barges filtering the water up like a giant shop-vac 
and separating the junk out.
thats like a 3500 mile array, staggered at ~7 miles (from equator to 50N 
assuming ~70 miles per degree latitude) plus the fact that there are four or 
five gyres that need to be cleaned up. the only real advantage a stationary 
barge has in a gyre would be lots and lots of sunlight to feed on. (solar 
engines, yeah buddy!!!)

assumptions:

1) there are ~300 million tons of plastic(s) in the NPG. (the survey area was 
kind of small comparatively(1) and its estimated to increase by about 10x every 
two years(2))

2) a seagoing barge container might carry 13000 tons(3).

3) the array consists of 500 collectors in a N-S line at ~7 mile intervals.

4) our machines accumulate no water.

results:

 with one barge per collector, it would take 40 trips to each barge clean up 
the NPG, and thats only if the influx of trash comes to a dead stop...  
yesterday.

aint gonna happen with these governments... probably take a private company to 
do it.


(1) http://www.mindfully.org/Plastic/Ocean/Moore-Trashed-PacificNov03.htm

(2) http://www.satyamag.com/apr07/moore.html

(3) http://www.mobymarine.com/CONNORGralCharac.pdf


 Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:13:35 -0700
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Message In A Bottle

 3.5 million tons of plastic ?
 Pyrolytic distillation should yield 300 million gallons. Is that enough to 
 attract reclaiming?
 Kirk

 Keith Addison  wrote:
 http://www.gtweekly.com/good-times/message-in-a-bottle-1

 Message In A Bottle

 Written by Amanda Martinez

 Wednesday, 19 March 2008

 Trash twice the size of the continental United States is collecting
 in the North Pacific, but here's the kicker: most of it is made to
 last forever.


_
Get in touch in an instant. Get Windows Live Messenger now.
http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Refresh_getintouch_042008
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/






___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


Re: [Biofuel] Message In A Bottle

2008-04-19 Thread Steve Moran
these things
http://www.trashskimmer.com/balt.htm



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Steve Moran
Sent: Sat 4/19/2008 9:38 AM
To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org; 
sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Message In A Bottle



They use something like that in the balitmore harbor.  a smallish boat with a 
conveyor belt in the center and two arms that scissor horizontally across the 
top of the water and have conveyor type belts on them that pull the garbage 
toward the center belt.  The boat floats on pontoons on the ouside of the 
conveyer and it has a bin type thing at the back of it.  The garbage is 
escorted by the arms toward the central belt, which picks it up and dumps it 
into the bin, the water just falls through the belt. 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Jason Mier
Sent: Sat 4/19/2008 7:29 AM
To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Message In A Bottle





nets can only pick up so much. i have an idea but it sounds kind of outlandish.

i am imagining a fleet of barges filtering the water up like a giant shop-vac 
and separating the junk out.
thats like a 3500 mile array, staggered at ~7 miles (from equator to 50N 
assuming ~70 miles per degree latitude) plus the fact that there are four or 
five gyres that need to be cleaned up. the only real advantage a stationary 
barge has in a gyre would be lots and lots of sunlight to feed on. (solar 
engines, yeah buddy!!!)

assumptions:

1) there are ~300 million tons of plastic(s) in the NPG. (the survey area was 
kind of small comparatively(1) and its estimated to increase by about 10x every 
two years(2))

2) a seagoing barge container might carry 13000 tons(3).

3) the array consists of 500 collectors in a N-S line at ~7 mile intervals.

4) our machines accumulate no water.

results:

 with one barge per collector, it would take 40 trips to each barge clean up 
the NPG, and thats only if the influx of trash comes to a dead stop...  
yesterday.

aint gonna happen with these governments... probably take a private company to 
do it.


(1) http://www.mindfully.org/Plastic/Ocean/Moore-Trashed-PacificNov03.htm

(2) http://www.satyamag.com/apr07/moore.html

(3) http://www.mobymarine.com/CONNORGralCharac.pdf


 Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:13:35 -0700
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Message In A Bottle

 3.5 million tons of plastic ?
 Pyrolytic distillation should yield 300 million gallons. Is that enough to 
 attract reclaiming?
 Kirk

 Keith Addison  wrote:
 http://www.gtweekly.com/good-times/message-in-a-bottle-1

 Message In A Bottle

 Written by Amanda Martinez

 Wednesday, 19 March 2008

 Trash twice the size of the continental United States is collecting
 in the North Pacific, but here's the kicker: most of it is made to
 last forever.


_
Get in touch in an instant. Get Windows Live Messenger now.
http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Refresh_getintouch_042008
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/






___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


[Biofuel] Newby

2008-03-29 Thread Steve Rhodes
Hi, Can anyone give me some info on locating methanol?  Just starting up
small  scale biodiesel processing. thanks, Steve
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20080329/0d330b40/attachment.html 
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


[Biofuel] bush league

2008-02-21 Thread Steve Rhodes
Does anyone realize that when the gov was saying there was no surplus of
crude oil and thus the high prices of gasoline  Exxon's billions of
quarterly profit Dollars, there were at least 16 fully laden ships waiting
outside Bolivar Roads  (entrance to Houston) refineries waiting for the
price to climb before they were brought into the refineries by their
agents.  It's all a crock of s--- 'this oil shortage'.  It's man made by the
bushmeister  fellow cronies. Capnbio
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20080221/04f3c978/attachment.html 
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


Re: [Biofuel] Al Gore's 'Inconvenient Truth' Power Use

2007-02-28 Thread Steve Knox
Enough already! We can kick the messenger, but the message is still relevant. 
By winning the Oscar, An Inconvenient Truth got lots of publicity, and just 
maybe will help spread the word.

Steve
  - Original Message - 
  From: Fred Oliff 
  To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org 
  Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 9:24 AM
  Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Al Gore's 'Inconvenient Truth' Power Use


  I would like to personally thank all of you in helping to cure my ignorance.






From:  Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:  biofuel@sustainablelists.org
To:  biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject:  Re: [Biofuel] Al Gore's 'Inconvenient Truth' Power Use
Date:  Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:26:10 +0900
Hi Fred

 actually to me both are important.  I think one of the worst things
 one can be called is a hypocrite.

Sticks and stones, and plenty of folks with their own agendas to
throw stones if there's aught to be gained from it. Both sides of
such accusations need checking for hipocrisy.

 if Al Gore's squanders energy perhaps they ought to find someone
 esle to be the spokesperson for the Earth.

They ought to? Who's they?

Did you ever notice Darryl's sig?

It's your planet.  If you won't look after it, who will?

Like everybody else, YOU are the spokesperson for the Earth, not some
other guy appointed by them.

Best

Keith



 From:  Kirk McLoren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To:  biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 To:  biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Subject:  Re: [Biofuel] Al Gore's 'Inconvenient Truth' Power Use
 Date:  Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:45:14 -0800 (PST)
 
 
 The message is - It isnt really that important. If it were I would do it.
 
 So how true is it - at least to him.
 
 If it doent motivate him maybe he knows something we dont.
 
 So of all people to squander energy it shouldnt be him.
 
 
 
 You might want to look into Cripple Creek Coal which he is on the
 board of directors.
 
 
 
 Kirk
 
 Tom Irwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 Hi Kirk and all,
 
 When the message cannot be attacked then attack the messenger. Ok,
 so Gore doesn´t walk the talk. How many of us do? We try to, but
 there is a long way to go for most everyone in the developed world.
 It´s the message that´s inportant, not the man.
 
 Tom Irwin
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 From:  Kirk McLoren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To:  biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 To:  biofuel Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Subject:  [Biofuel] Al Gore's 'Inconvenient Truth' Power Use
 Date:  Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:57:43 -0800 (PST)
 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/




--


  ___
  Biofuel mailing list
  Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
  http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

  Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
  http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] reIs the Deadly Crash of Our Civilization Inevitable?

2007-02-14 Thread Steve Racz
It's probably going to get pretty crowded then down here in the south in New 
Zealand. I'm glad I had a chance to get in early on some real estate.

I think we'll be in trouble long before then. There are some in humankind that  
still cling to the notion that starting wars will lead to peace and as the 
world's resources dwindle, there will be more and more reasons found for 
creating peace!

Steve

On Wednesday 14 February 2007 04:36 pm, John Wilson wrote:
HI Peter,

So we better have figured out what to do before then
(about 4 billion years from now)!

We don't have the full 4 billion years. The next major catastrophy happens in
 about ten thousand. Let us hope it is just a small ice age and not a major
 one. I am still trying to get rid of the bolders the last ice age left
 behind. All northern cities and infrastructure will be wiped away by tons of
 ice. In the mean time if the earth rotates on its axis we won't even know
 which cities will be in the north and affected. Yours truly
John Wilson
***
Wilsonia Farm Kennel Preserve
Goldens
Ph-Fax (902)665-2386)
Web:  http://www3.ns.sympatico.ca/goldens/new.htm
 Pups:  http://www3.ns.sympatico.ca/goldens/pup.htm
 Politics:  http://www3.ns.sympatico.ca/goldens/elect.htm

In Nova Scotia smoking permitted in designated areas only until 9:00 PM .
 After 9:00 it is okey to kill everyone.

Not anymore! Smoke freedom day 6 th December 2006
^


Yours truly
John Wilson
***
Wilsonia Farm Kennel Preserve
Goldens
Ph-Fax (902)665-2386)
Web:  http://www3.ns.sympatico.ca/goldens/new.htm
 Pups:  http://www3.ns.sympatico.ca/goldens/pup.htm

In Nova Scotia smoking permitted in designated areas only until 9:00 PM .
 After 9:00 it is okey to kill everyone.

Not anymore! Smoke freedom day 6 th December 2006
^

-- 
Steve Racz
(03) 383 8167
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] A heat Engine for the house.

2006-10-28 Thread Steve Racz
See WhisperGen
http://www.whispergen.com/

A company from here in Christchurch, New Zealand is producing units using a 
Stirling engine. Their market is currently primarily the UK as a replacement 
for home or office central heating systems while also producing power to 
either consume or put back into the grid. For off grid, they offer a DC model 
in various sizes, including some suitable for use on boats.

The majority shareholder is Meridian Energy, one of the largest electricty 
producers here.

Here in NZ, they don't believe in heating houses, so it's not a big market and 
I'm never seen one in use or even for sale, though these are designed, 
developed and manufactured here.

steve

On Saturday 28 October 2006 01:18 pm, Zeke Yewdall wrote:
This is known as Cogeneration, and in the energy consulting world is
considered pretty hot.  Usually it's trying to recuperate heat from small
turbines, fuel cells, or even large turbines, but it generally pays back
pretty well (because usually the other option is just throwing away all that
heat, because they need the electricity anyway).  I suspect that the problem
was the gasoline is a pretty high priced form of BTU's.  But they've made
working systems using MW sized diesel generators in some alaskan villages,
and they pay $3 or $4 per gallon for fuel (and $0.40/kWh for the resulting
electricity) I don't actually know anyone who's done this on a scale smaller
than a large commercial building or campus, but perhaps there's someone out
there   The thing is that if you just want to get heat, it's always more
efficient to just run a boiler or furnace or such, and not waste energy in
making movement.  But if you can syphon off 20% of the energy into motion,
which you then turn to high value energy such as electricity, it might be
better.   Also, you've got to match the electrical and thermal loads, which
often don't match well, though they could in certain situations.

Z

On 10/27/06, JAMES PHELPS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 When I lived in Colorado I looked into using a Gas engine With a generator
 to provide heating and electricity in the heavy winter months.  The idea
 was
 to use all but the heat exchanged exhaust as heat source and the generated
 power for electricity. It was not cost effective at that time with fuel
 prices at $1.75 but I wonder now with biodiesel. Has anyone done anything
 like this or is this a looser anyway you look at it?

 Jim


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

-- 
Steve Racz
(03) 383 8167
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Are there more nuclear reactors than we are toldabout?

2006-08-18 Thread Steve Barton



Hello

These smaller cooling towersyou speak of Kirk
are the type of cooling tower that has a fan or fansthat ether draws or
suck air across the cascaiding water for evatorative cooling of the water. The
tall hour glass shaped towers are natural draft towres, No moving parts, no
fans, just cascaiding water. they are saving energy. These towers, even when dry
can and will suck a hard hat of your head when you go into one at the bottom,
even on a dead calm day.

Open mind... that I have, have
beenwaiting for the biodiesel posts to come but since I got on this list I
see mainly political comments. The frist night I was on there were a few and
then I got spanked for being a newbie and asking questions. Maybe I did not set
up the e-mail service to recive the good stuff. Will keep watching and
reading.

sorry about the spelling, Steve
- Original Message - 

  From:
  Kirk
  McLoren 
  To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
  
  Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 12:08
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Are there more
  nuclear reactors than we are toldabout?
  bob allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
Howdy Kirk, I scanned the first part of the article and to be honest
found it lacking. The author either doesn't edit or hasn't a clue
about power plant functioning, cooling requirements or
capacity." These gigantic structures were atomic style cooling
towers usually only seen at nuclear power plants where they guard the
reactors as the Sphinx guards the great Pyramids. What were these
conical structures doing in Foul Rift? I had never heard of nuclear
plants in Western New Jersey. Something was completely out of
place!..."there is no such thing as an "atomic style cooling
tower" any heat engine requires cooling, and coal fired plants use
exactly the same type of cooling tower.
--
Nukes run at a lower thermal efficiency for safety reasons. Temperature
and thus pressure are lower than in oil or coal steam plants. This increases
the cooling tower load per killowatt thus nuke plants have larger towers
than equivalent hydrocarbon installations. The size is the issue here. Other
issues he made were the rails showed no sign of use and thirdly the "oil "
storage tanks also showed no maintenance. So he describes a plant with
anomolously large cooling towers and no visible fueling
infrastructure.

Also inhydrocarbon installations I have seen the tower is
different,maybe 3 stories. The tower is to direct cooling air and
discharged water vapor such that it doesnt re enter the heat exchangers. The
nuclear plants have such large requirements a large structure is required to
ensure no mixing.

How about keeping an open mind Bob. You didnt read what he said as near
as I can tell.

Kirk McLoren wrote:
http://www.rene-r.com/essays/the-mystery-of-martins-creek.html
 In one man's opinion, I think that the Martin's Creek plant may
just be  the tip of the ice berg..
  
  
  Do you Yahoo!?Get on board. You're
  invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
  
  

  ___Biofuel mailing
  listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel
  at Journey to
  Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the
  combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
  messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Fuel Help

2006-08-11 Thread Steve Barton



About 20 plusyears ago I worked in a fuel
farm and around a test stand that was testing - running a J-58 jet engine
that used JP-8 fuel and that stuff was loaded with PCBs, acts as a coolant for
the fuel as it burnes. Not uesr if it was an additive used just for this engine
or inall JP-8. The J-58 was the engines that were in the
SR-71.

Scared to post, Steve

- Original Message - 

  From:
  Paul S
  Cantrell 
  To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
  
  Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 8:10
  PM
  Subject: [SPAM]: Re: [Biofuel] Fuel
  Help
  It looks and smells like absolutely brand new. Apparently
  the additives in JP-8 include enough *-icide to keep it out. Also it was
  sealed tightly with no air.
  On 8/11/06, Kirk
  McLoren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
  

I would expect any fuel that old to be half digested by bacteria.
Kirk
Zeke Yewdall 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Are
  we so strapped for fuel that we have to siphon 20 year old stuff out of
  helicopters now???  I guess it does make more sense than
  throwing it away, so I'd go for it. Since the main problem with
  kerosene in diesel engines is lack of lubricity, I'd mix it with biodiesel
  instead of diesel -- offset the low lubricity stuff with high lubricity
  stuff. Also, the whole impetus behind the army developing
  diesel motorcycles is apparently so they don't have to bring gasoline
  along at all -- helicopters, tanks, dirt bikes, everything will run on the
  same jet fuel Z
  On 8/11/06, Joe
  Street 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

Hi Paul;I can't say for
sure but I have heard of the guys who work as ground crew at the
Tortonto airport putting jet fuel in their diesel cars. Apparently
fuel which is drained from wing tanks is not allowed to be put back in
so they often have some 'waste'. JoePaul S Cantrell
wrote:

Good Afternoon all,I have an interesting story for ya'll
today. I work at a small military college. Being a military
school, we have a tank, a personnel carrier, a rocket, several
howitzers, an F-4 Phantom, an anchor and a Huey Cobra helicopter on the
parade field. The helicopter is why I'm writing. It was
donated by the national guard 20 years ago and the engine was
removed. However, the FUEL was not removed. It smells like
kerosene. It is colorless/clear and dry, since the fuel tanks were
full and sealed the whole time. This discovery was made when we
decided to move it to pour a concrete pad for it. A sample
weighs exactly 800 grams per liter (digital scale is +/-20 grams), so it
is too heavy to be JP4 (50% gasoline/50%kerosene + additives), too light
for diesel and about right to be JP8 (100% kerosene + additives). I
referenced this website for densities of fuel:http://www.simetric.co.uk/si_liquids.htm I
have a 98 VW Jetta TDI that has half a tank of regualar #2 diesel in it
at the moment. I know up north in the US the fuel companies mix
diesel with kerosene up to 50/50 in the winter time. Also, as I
understand it, the new ULSD is very similar to kerosene.Should I
have any reservation mixing it up to 50/50 in my car? I don't
really, I just wanted to share the story and hear from ya'll. No
real answers at the TDIClub website.--
Thanks,PCHe's the kind of a guy who lights up a room
just by flicking a switch The genius of you Americans is that
you never make clear-cut stupid moves, only complicated stupid moves
which make us wonder at the possibility that there may be something to
them which we are missing. - Gamal Abdel Nasser 
  ___Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
Biofuel at Journey to Forever:  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/  ___Biofuel
mailing listBiofuel@sustainablelists.org http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
Biofuel at Journey to Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch
the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/___Biofuel
  mailing listBiofuel@sustainablelists.org http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch
  the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
  http://www.mail

Re: [Biofuel] Fuel Help

2006-08-11 Thread Steve Barton



So sorry, I was thinking that the J-58 used
JP-8, Its been awhile since a was around a fuel farm.I believe that it was
JP-7 that the J-58 used. Sorry for any confusion.

Now realy scard to post, Steve

  - Original Message - 
  From:
  Paul S
  Cantrell 
  To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
  
  Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 8:10
  PM
  Subject: [SPAM]: Re: [Biofuel] Fuel
  Help
  It looks and smells like absolutely brand new. Apparently
  the additives in JP-8 include enough *-icide to keep it out. Also it was
  sealed tightly with no air.
  On 8/11/06, Kirk
  McLoren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
  

I would expect any fuel that old to be half digested by bacteria.
Kirk
Zeke Yewdall 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Are
  we so strapped for fuel that we have to siphon 20 year old stuff out of
  helicopters now???  I guess it does make more sense than
  throwing it away, so I'd go for it. Since the main problem with
  kerosene in diesel engines is lack of lubricity, I'd mix it with biodiesel
  instead of diesel -- offset the low lubricity stuff with high lubricity
  stuff. Also, the whole impetus behind the army developing
  diesel motorcycles is apparently so they don't have to bring gasoline
  along at all -- helicopters, tanks, dirt bikes, everything will run on the
  same jet fuel Z
  On 8/11/06, Joe
  Street 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

Hi Paul;I can't say for
sure but I have heard of the guys who work as ground crew at the
Tortonto airport putting jet fuel in their diesel cars. Apparently
fuel which is drained from wing tanks is not allowed to be put back in
so they often have some 'waste'. JoePaul S Cantrell
wrote:

Good Afternoon all,I have an interesting story for ya'll
today. I work at a small military college. Being a military
school, we have a tank, a personnel carrier, a rocket, several
howitzers, an F-4 Phantom, an anchor and a Huey Cobra helicopter on the
parade field. The helicopter is why I'm writing. It was
donated by the national guard 20 years ago and the engine was
removed. However, the FUEL was not removed. It smells like
kerosene. It is colorless/clear and dry, since the fuel tanks were
full and sealed the whole time. This discovery was made when we
decided to move it to pour a concrete pad for it. A sample
weighs exactly 800 grams per liter (digital scale is +/-20 grams), so it
is too heavy to be JP4 (50% gasoline/50%kerosene + additives), too light
for diesel and about right to be JP8 (100% kerosene + additives). I
referenced this website for densities of fuel:http://www.simetric.co.uk/si_liquids.htm I
have a 98 VW Jetta TDI that has half a tank of regualar #2 diesel in it
at the moment. I know up north in the US the fuel companies mix
diesel with kerosene up to 50/50 in the winter time. Also, as I
understand it, the new ULSD is very similar to kerosene.Should I
have any reservation mixing it up to 50/50 in my car? I don't
really, I just wanted to share the story and hear from ya'll. No
real answers at the TDIClub website.--
Thanks,PCHe's the kind of a guy who lights up a room
just by flicking a switch The genius of you Americans is that
you never make clear-cut stupid moves, only complicated stupid moves
which make us wonder at the possibility that there may be something to
them which we are missing. - Gamal Abdel Nasser 
  ___Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
Biofuel at Journey to Forever:  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/  ___Biofuel
mailing listBiofuel@sustainablelists.org http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
Biofuel at Journey to Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch
the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/___Biofuel
  mailing listBiofuel@sustainablelists.org http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch
  the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
  http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Do you Yahoo!?Next-gen email? Have it all with the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta

Re: [Biofuel] Using biodiesel in newer truck-cars

2006-08-06 Thread Steve Barton
From what I have seen on the net and read the fuel sould be washed 3 time to 
get a clean product. Some or most of you out there making biodiesel every 
day might say that this is over kil. I don't know as I'm just getting 
started.
My first wash will be mist only to remove the bulk of unwanted products from 
the reaction. 2nd wash mist and mild aireation, 3rd wash, mist and strong 
aireation. I think that this might work to help cut down on any emulsions in 
the wash and help move the fuel in the tank around a bit on the last wash as 
well. Just my thoughs on it.

Steve
- Original Message - 
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 12:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Using biodiesel in newer truck-cars


Thank for the info.

Derick, I Would like to see pictures of your processor.

 I have made a few sample liters of biodiesel and this weekend will
do a few more using used oil to nasty used oil to get a better feel
for the the things that should and should not happen. Today a found
a supply of used 100 gal tanks that I can use and mod to make my
processor with. I plan to have one pertreat tank, processor tank,
dry tank with two poly wash tanks. Frist wash tank will wash with
spray in the frist stage and spray with air bubbler for the second
stage. The second wash tank will have spray, bubbler and aggatation.
Then to the dryer. After some testing of the fuel hopefully into the
truck tank it will go. All of this might sound like a bit of over
kill but this is what I feel comfortable with for my new 2005 truck.
If any one wants to put any input in I'm all ears, really, there big.

Will try to post pictures as I go with the consruction of the unit.

Post them where? The list doesn't accept attachments (as you were
advised when you joined). If you want to post pictures you can
discuss it with me offlist and if suitable I can post them at the
Journey to Forever website and give you a link to use.

Thanks Again, Steve

Why do you want to use sprays and air-bubblers Steve, to help prevent
emulsions?

Best

Keith


 Original Message -

From: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Derick Giorchino
To: mailto:biofuel@sustainablelists.orgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 5:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Using biodiesel in newer truck-cars

I   have a 04 dodge with a Cummins and have been running it on b100
for 1 ½ years after researching this to death. And finding nothing
on bio in late models Cummins talks in circles about bio saying the
jury is still out. Although they don't say not to use it they don't
say its o.k. so I am doing my own research all is good with about
26000 miles in bio only.

Good luck Derick




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve
Barton
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 5:15 AM
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: [Biofuel] Using biodiesel in newer truck-cars



Hello to all

I'm new to all of this and have read and studied the makeing of
biodiesel and have planed out a plane to produce it as well But
befor diving into to deep of water I have not found much info about
runing home made biodiesel in newer engines. I have a 2005 chevy
diesel truck with the 6.6lly engine in it. Any links on the net or
info about problems that I might have running biodiesel that I have
made myself in a newer computer controled diesels would be nice.
Thanks for the help.



Frist post to the list, Steve


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/




___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Using biodiesel in newer truck-cars

2006-08-04 Thread Steve Barton



Thank for the info.

Derick, I Would like to see pictures of your
processor.

I have made a few sample liters of biodiesel
and this weekend will do a few more using used oil to nasty used oil to get
abetter feel for the the things that should and should not happen. Today a
found a supply of used 100 gal tanks that I can use and mod to make my processor
with. I plan to have one pertreat tank, processor tank, dry tank with
twopoly wash tanks. Frist wash tank will wash with spray in the frist
stage and spray with air bubbler for the second stage. The second wash tank will
have spray, bubbler and aggatation. Then to the dryer. After some testing of the
fuel hopefully into the truck tank it will go. All of this might sound like a
bit of over kill but this is what I feel comfortable with for my new
2005truck. If any one wants to put any input in I'm all ears, really,
there big.

Will try to post pictures as I go with the
consruction of the unit.

Thanks Again, Steve

 Original Message - 

  From:
  Derick Giorchino
  
  To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
  
  Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 5:44
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Using biodiesel in
  newer truck-cars
  
  
  I have a
  04 dodge with a Cummins and have been running it on b100 for 1 ½ years after
  researching this to death. And finding nothing on bio in late models Cummins
  talks in circles about bio saying the jury is still out. Although they don’t
  say not to use it they don’t say its o.k. so I am doing my own research all is
  good with about 26000 miles in bio only.
  Good luck
  Derick
  
  
  
  
  
  From:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve BartonSent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 5:15
  AMTo: biofuel@sustainablelists.orgSubject: [Biofuel] Using biodiesel in
  newer truck-cars
  
  
  Hello to
  all
  
  I'm new to all of this and have
  read and studied the makeing of biodiesel and have planed out a plane to
  produce it as well But befor diving into to deep of water I have not found
  much info about runing home made biodiesel in newer engines. I have a 2005
  chevy diesel truck with the 6.6lly engine in it. Any links on the net or info
  about problems that I might have running biodiesel that I have made myself in
  a newer computer controled diesels would be nice. Thanks for the
  help.
  
  
  
  Frist post to the list,
  Steve
  
  

  ___Biofuel mailing
  listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel
  at Journey to
  Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the
  combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
  messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Using biodiesel in newer truck-cars

2006-08-03 Thread Steve Barton




Thank for the input and info so far. Still pushing
forward with a processor, but would like to hear more from anyone that has had
trouble with the newer engines.
Please keep them coming.

Thanks, Steve

  - Original Message - 
  From:
  DB 
  To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
  
  Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 4:38
  AM
  Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Using biodiesel in
  newer truck-cars
  
  I had an 02 volkswagon golf that I put 30,000
  miles on.(100% bio)there were no problems till the engine light went on.
  We took it too a couple of shops with no results and had to take it to the
  dealer. $1600 poorer all I knew is that the injector pump had to be replaced
  because the fuel sensor had failed. It was my wife's car and it took a week
  before we got it back. They woudn't give her the pump so I couldn't have
  a look. They said there was a $600 core charge. I was out of town on a job and
  couldn't do anything but pay the money. I was so pissed of that I sold it and
  bought an 86 mercedes 190D. (for her) I have an 83TD wagon. They both run on
  100% BD, with no problem. We actually started out with an80 CD and sold
  it to buy the volkswagon.Good luck with the new crap . Computers and
  billions of sensors all made in China and doomed to heartache. The engine
  light will go on. blinking out this message.."go directly to dealer, bring
  CASH... DB
  
- Original Message - 
From:
Steve
Barton 
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org

Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 2:15
AM
Subject: [Biofuel] Using biodiesel in
newer truck-cars

Hello to all
I'm new to all of this and have read and
studied the makeing of biodiesel and have planed out a plane to produce it
as well But befor diving into to deep of water I have not found much
info about runing home made biodiesel in newer engines. I have a 2005 chevy
diesel truck with the 6.6lly engine in it. Any links on the net or info
about problems that I might have running biodiesel that I have made myself
in a newer computer controled diesels would be nice. Thanks for the
help.

Frist post to the list, Steve



___Biofuel mailing
listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel
at Journey to
Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the
combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
  
  

  ___Biofuel mailing
  listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel
  at Journey to
  Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the
  combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
  messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] Using biodiesel in newer truck-cars

2006-08-02 Thread Steve Barton



Hello to all
I'm new to all of this and have read and studied
the makeing of biodiesel and have planed out a plane to produce it as well
But befor diving into to deep of water I have not found much info about runing
home made biodiesel in newer engines. I have a 2005 chevy diesel truck with the
6.6lly engine in it. Any links on the net or info about problems that I might
have running biodiesel that I have made myself in a newer computer controled
diesels would be nice. Thanks for the help.

Frist post to the list,
Steve

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Lawn question off topic

2006-06-19 Thread Steve Racz
I have to agree here. I kept an organic lawn  for 10 years. I used a mulching 
mower to put the clippings back into the lawn and used  the mower on its 
tallest setting. The rare time I watered (which wasn't often even though I 
lived in Dallas with its 100F avg temps in the summer), I watered deeply - 
but mostly I let the lawn go dormant in the summer. None of the neighbors 
complained and not that I would have cared anyway. In the fall all the leaves 
from the trees went into compost piles and then in the spring or fall or 
whenever it suited, it was sifted through a 1/2 sifter, shovelled into a 
spreader and on it went on top of the grass.

Compost is a great 'fertiliser'. It is slow releasing and is nicely balanced 
in all nutrients. You don't need to water it in and you can never overapply. 
There are no worries from any runoff.

Contrary to some misconceptions about compost - it can never get too hot - the 
heat is from the micro-organisms who are doing the work of breaking the 
organic material down. They thrive on moisture and air and they produce heat 
as a by-product. The more heat, the faster the breakdown.

There is no need to apply heat. The heat is a byproduct, not an input to 
compost.. Blowing hot air through compost, is, well, a lot of hot air.

If anyone is in doubt of the power of compost, try this for a summer project: 
sneak out to a sports field with a spreader full of compost and in huge 
letters, spell out your favorite team's name ( or whatever!) on the pitch and 
then watch what happens for the rest of the season!

Compost is a natural product. As long as the source is organic, home made 
compost is better than anything you would have normally used instead.

Steve




On Monday 19 June 2006 06:11 am, DB wrote:
you don't have to grind compost really fine to spread it on your
lawn...break it down to about 1/2 in particles and rake it in with a wide
rake. I have a one acre lot with lots of grass, orchard and garden. I only
weed the garden and only mow the grass. living in the city means your lawn
needs to be as nice or better than your neighbors, but that is  really just
an ego problem. my lawn looks just fine to me...Your lawn probabily
would look just fine to me too.DB
- Original Message -
From: robert and benita rabello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2006 7:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Lawn question off topic

 JJJN wrote:
Hello folks, any organic lawn experts out there?  I have been
encroaching out  75% of my lawn with food plants  for both wildlife and
humans, but I still have this 25% and living in town  I  need to  keep
it lawn.  the question is how does one raise a great lawn without weed
killers etc?  I have been wondering , can you take compost and grind it
really fine and spread it on the lawn water it in?  Would this be good?

I don't think this is off topic, as it relates directly to the
 mentality of dirt as a growing medium that is so pervasive and lies at
 the root of much difficulty in our society.  I've actually had a lawn
 professional suggest that I rip out my lawn and replace it with
 garden.  You seem to be more successful at growing vegetables than
 grass, he said.

I've aereated my lawn this year and watered with mixture of compost
 tea and organic compost enhancement liquid.  It's much greener and
 healthier than it's been in the past, but this method still smacks of
 replacing chemical fertilizers with non chemical fertilizers.

It's not that I hate grass, but I'm NOT pleased with the monoculture
 mentality that insists it must be of a uniform species.  When we first
 bought this property it was covered in grasses that were long and made a
 lovely sound as the seed heads touseled in the wind.  But now, I keep
 the motley collection of grasses that pass for lawn on my property
 trimmed to 55 millimeters.  If anyone has better ideas for lawn
 maintenance that will not raise the ire of my neighbors (who already
 think I'm weird), please let me know.

 robert luis rabello
 The Edge of Justice
 Adventure for Your Mind
 http://www.newadventure.ca

 Ranger Supercharger Project Page
 http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org

Re: [Biofuel] Kicking the oil habit

2006-06-07 Thread Steve Knox
Mike,

  I had to live with the guy. You have no idea the damage he did to the 
state.

Steve
- Original Message - 
From: Mike Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 6:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kicking the oil habit


 Unfortunately.

 I am not a Loeb fan!

 Steve Knox wrote:

Mike,

  I share your view of the Union Leader, but they do have a readership.

Steve Knox
- Original Message - 
From: Mike Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kicking the oil habit




My least favorite newspaper in the world.  Look up Hush, you Muskies
on the web.

-Weaver

Steve Knox wrote:



 I wish that I shared Robert Redford's confidence that Americans are way
out in front of our leaders in facing our toughest national challenges.
After the Memorial Day Weekend, the Manchester Union Leader, which is a
statewide paper, ran an editorial about speeding on New Hampshire's
Interstate Highways. They suggested that since most people were driving
between 70 and 80 mph, we should raise the speed limit. Several days 
later
they said how the response to that editorial was overwhelming in 
support.
They said it was one of the greatest responses they had ever gotten. 
Speed
reduces even further the already low mpg that most cars get. We can wish
and
hope that a majority of the American people are ready to face the
challenge,
but I'm not convinced.

Steve Knox

- Original Message - 
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 9:26 AM
Subject: [Biofuel] Kicking the oil habit






http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/05/30/redford.oil/index.html
Commentary: Kicking the oil habit

By Robert Redford
Special to CNN

Tuesday, May 30, 2006; Posted: 4:55 p.m. EDT (20:55 GMT)


Editor's note: Robert Redford is an award-winning actor, director,
producer and founder of the Sundance Institute and Film Festival.
Redford also is a businessman and philanthropist and has long
supported various environmental causes.
Robert Redford: America is ready to kick the oil habit.

SUNDANCE, Utah (CNN) -- Today the American people are way out in
front of our leaders. We're ready to face our toughest national
challenges, and we deserve new and forward-looking solutions and
leadership.

The recent surge in gas prices has touched a raw nerve for many
around the country, reminding us of an economy that is increasingly
uncertain for the middle-class, a growing addiction to oil that draws
us ever closer to dictators and despots, and a fragile global
position with a climate that is increasingly out of balance. I
believe America is ready to kick the oil habit and launch a new
movement for real solutions and a better future.

Something is happening all across the country. People are coming
together and demanding new answers. A grassroots movement is
gathering today to promote solutions, like renewable fuels, clean
electricity, more efficient cars, and green buildings that use less
energy -- all of which are exciting alternatives that rebuild our
communities even as they cut pollution and create good jobs. And,
when people come together to invest themselves in building a better
future, we are not only helping to solve our energy crisis, but we
are taking back our democracy itself.

You can see this change in many places.

In California this November, voters will be offered an initiative
that cuts the use of oil by 25 percent and creates new funding to
support innovation and cutting edge technology.

Austin, Texas, is leading a growing number of cities in calling for
car companies to produce plug-in hybrid vehicles that can go hundreds
of miles on a gallon of gas.

New Mexico has joined the Chicago Climate Exchange, pledging to
reduce its carbon emissions, and at the same time becoming a national
leader in creating a state-of-the-art clean energy economy.

In Minnesota they have jump-started a new biofuels industry driven by
farmer-owned co-ops that are putting more money back into rural
communities and lifting up people's lives.

Cities like Seattle are joining with others around the world and
taking on goals for green development, while states like Colorado are
passing bond initiatives for transit and new requirements for clean
energy.

Recently, a dynamic new campaign launched to seize and grow these
opportunities and break our energy dependence. It's called
KickTheOilHabit.org, and it has the backing of a diverse coalition of
organizations. Its first action was to challenge oil companies to
double the number of renewable fuel pumps at their stations within
the year and pledge to offer E85 ethanol fuel at half of all gas
stations within the decade.

This is a simple clear action that the oil companies can do today.
But it is only a first step. Many others are ready to be put in
action despite industry claims to the contrary.

In coming months, this campaign, which is based

Re: [Biofuel] Kicking the oil habit

2006-06-06 Thread Steve Knox
Mike,

  I share your view of the Union Leader, but they do have a readership.

Steve Knox
- Original Message - 
From: Mike Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kicking the oil habit


 My least favorite newspaper in the world.  Look up Hush, you Muskies
 on the web.

 -Weaver

 Steve Knox wrote:

  I wish that I shared Robert Redford's confidence that Americans are way
out in front of our leaders in facing our toughest national challenges.
After the Memorial Day Weekend, the Manchester Union Leader, which is a
statewide paper, ran an editorial about speeding on New Hampshire's
Interstate Highways. They suggested that since most people were driving
between 70 and 80 mph, we should raise the speed limit. Several days later
they said how the response to that editorial was overwhelming in support.
They said it was one of the greatest responses they had ever gotten. Speed
reduces even further the already low mpg that most cars get. We can wish 
and
hope that a majority of the American people are ready to face the 
challenge,
but I'm not convinced.

Steve Knox

- Original Message - 
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 9:26 AM
Subject: [Biofuel] Kicking the oil habit




http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/05/30/redford.oil/index.html
Commentary: Kicking the oil habit

By Robert Redford
Special to CNN

Tuesday, May 30, 2006; Posted: 4:55 p.m. EDT (20:55 GMT)


Editor's note: Robert Redford is an award-winning actor, director,
producer and founder of the Sundance Institute and Film Festival.
Redford also is a businessman and philanthropist and has long
supported various environmental causes.
Robert Redford: America is ready to kick the oil habit.

SUNDANCE, Utah (CNN) -- Today the American people are way out in
front of our leaders. We're ready to face our toughest national
challenges, and we deserve new and forward-looking solutions and
leadership.

The recent surge in gas prices has touched a raw nerve for many
around the country, reminding us of an economy that is increasingly
uncertain for the middle-class, a growing addiction to oil that draws
us ever closer to dictators and despots, and a fragile global
position with a climate that is increasingly out of balance. I
believe America is ready to kick the oil habit and launch a new
movement for real solutions and a better future.

Something is happening all across the country. People are coming
together and demanding new answers. A grassroots movement is
gathering today to promote solutions, like renewable fuels, clean
electricity, more efficient cars, and green buildings that use less
energy -- all of which are exciting alternatives that rebuild our
communities even as they cut pollution and create good jobs. And,
when people come together to invest themselves in building a better
future, we are not only helping to solve our energy crisis, but we
are taking back our democracy itself.

You can see this change in many places.

In California this November, voters will be offered an initiative
that cuts the use of oil by 25 percent and creates new funding to
support innovation and cutting edge technology.

Austin, Texas, is leading a growing number of cities in calling for
car companies to produce plug-in hybrid vehicles that can go hundreds
of miles on a gallon of gas.

New Mexico has joined the Chicago Climate Exchange, pledging to
reduce its carbon emissions, and at the same time becoming a national
leader in creating a state-of-the-art clean energy economy.

In Minnesota they have jump-started a new biofuels industry driven by
farmer-owned co-ops that are putting more money back into rural
communities and lifting up people's lives.

Cities like Seattle are joining with others around the world and
taking on goals for green development, while states like Colorado are
passing bond initiatives for transit and new requirements for clean
energy.

Recently, a dynamic new campaign launched to seize and grow these
opportunities and break our energy dependence. It's called
KickTheOilHabit.org, and it has the backing of a diverse coalition of
organizations. Its first action was to challenge oil companies to
double the number of renewable fuel pumps at their stations within
the year and pledge to offer E85 ethanol fuel at half of all gas
stations within the decade.

This is a simple clear action that the oil companies can do today.
But it is only a first step. Many others are ready to be put in
action despite industry claims to the contrary.

In coming months, this campaign, which is based at the Center for
American Progress and works with partners from the Natural Resources
Defense Council to Consumers Union, MoveOn.org to the Apollo
Alliance, will launch new challenges to our elected leaders, but it
will also point to good work that is already going on all around the
country. It will illuminate efforts on Capitol Hill

Re: [Biofuel] Kicking the oil habit

2006-06-05 Thread Steve Knox

  I wish that I shared Robert Redford's confidence that Americans are way 
out in front of our leaders in facing our toughest national challenges. 
After the Memorial Day Weekend, the Manchester Union Leader, which is a 
statewide paper, ran an editorial about speeding on New Hampshire's 
Interstate Highways. They suggested that since most people were driving 
between 70 and 80 mph, we should raise the speed limit. Several days later 
they said how the response to that editorial was overwhelming in support. 
They said it was one of the greatest responses they had ever gotten. Speed 
reduces even further the already low mpg that most cars get. We can wish and 
hope that a majority of the American people are ready to face the challenge, 
but I'm not convinced.

Steve Knox

- Original Message - 
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 9:26 AM
Subject: [Biofuel] Kicking the oil habit


 http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/05/30/redford.oil/index.html
 Commentary: Kicking the oil habit

 By Robert Redford
 Special to CNN

 Tuesday, May 30, 2006; Posted: 4:55 p.m. EDT (20:55 GMT)


 Editor's note: Robert Redford is an award-winning actor, director,
 producer and founder of the Sundance Institute and Film Festival.
 Redford also is a businessman and philanthropist and has long
 supported various environmental causes.
 Robert Redford: America is ready to kick the oil habit.

 SUNDANCE, Utah (CNN) -- Today the American people are way out in
 front of our leaders. We're ready to face our toughest national
 challenges, and we deserve new and forward-looking solutions and
 leadership.

 The recent surge in gas prices has touched a raw nerve for many
 around the country, reminding us of an economy that is increasingly
 uncertain for the middle-class, a growing addiction to oil that draws
 us ever closer to dictators and despots, and a fragile global
 position with a climate that is increasingly out of balance. I
 believe America is ready to kick the oil habit and launch a new
 movement for real solutions and a better future.

 Something is happening all across the country. People are coming
 together and demanding new answers. A grassroots movement is
 gathering today to promote solutions, like renewable fuels, clean
 electricity, more efficient cars, and green buildings that use less
 energy -- all of which are exciting alternatives that rebuild our
 communities even as they cut pollution and create good jobs. And,
 when people come together to invest themselves in building a better
 future, we are not only helping to solve our energy crisis, but we
 are taking back our democracy itself.

 You can see this change in many places.

 In California this November, voters will be offered an initiative
 that cuts the use of oil by 25 percent and creates new funding to
 support innovation and cutting edge technology.

 Austin, Texas, is leading a growing number of cities in calling for
 car companies to produce plug-in hybrid vehicles that can go hundreds
 of miles on a gallon of gas.

 New Mexico has joined the Chicago Climate Exchange, pledging to
 reduce its carbon emissions, and at the same time becoming a national
 leader in creating a state-of-the-art clean energy economy.

 In Minnesota they have jump-started a new biofuels industry driven by
 farmer-owned co-ops that are putting more money back into rural
 communities and lifting up people's lives.

 Cities like Seattle are joining with others around the world and
 taking on goals for green development, while states like Colorado are
 passing bond initiatives for transit and new requirements for clean
 energy.

 Recently, a dynamic new campaign launched to seize and grow these
 opportunities and break our energy dependence. It's called
 KickTheOilHabit.org, and it has the backing of a diverse coalition of
 organizations. Its first action was to challenge oil companies to
 double the number of renewable fuel pumps at their stations within
 the year and pledge to offer E85 ethanol fuel at half of all gas
 stations within the decade.

 This is a simple clear action that the oil companies can do today.
 But it is only a first step. Many others are ready to be put in
 action despite industry claims to the contrary.

 In coming months, this campaign, which is based at the Center for
 American Progress and works with partners from the Natural Resources
 Defense Council to Consumers Union, MoveOn.org to the Apollo
 Alliance, will launch new challenges to our elected leaders, but it
 will also point to good work that is already going on all around the
 country. It will illuminate efforts on Capitol Hill by those who are
 concerned about the public good as well as the work of a myriad of
 grassroots groups effectively pushing innovative technological and
 public policy solutions alike.

 Kick the Oil Habit will bring forth the dynamic narrative of American
 innovation and inspired thinking. It will give everyone who

Re: [Biofuel] Biodiesel from wood

2006-06-02 Thread Steve Knox
I believe that there is a company in Germany (CHOREN) who makes biodiesel 
from wood. If my memory is correct, they're getting about 60 or so gallons 
per ton. A major oil company has bought an interest in the company.

Steve
- Original Message - 
From: Zeke Yewdall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 10:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Biodiesel from wood


Using wood as feedstock means using either lignin or cellulose, right?
 If so, alot of stuff could be made into biodiesel -- grass, weeds,
cardboard, etc...  Thermo catalytic cracking is the only thing I can
think of that could do this.  Unless they have some fancy microbes
that can digest lignin and give oil?

I also remember that in WWII germany was trying to distill gasoline
substitutes from pine trees -- I thought this was more like turpentine
though, derived more from the sap than the wood?   I'm not an expert
on this by any means, but perhaps someone else remembers exactly what
they were doing.

Zeke

On 6/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Has anyone heard of such a thing? It says Wood-based biodiesel
 production requires the development of new technology. Are they on to
 something or are they still working out if this is even possible?

 Steve

 http://snipurl.com/r8b3

 (2006-05-26) Hydro and Norske Skog have agreed to carry out a joint
 feasibility study relating to the production of biodiesel from wood.
 The intention is to identify the feasibility of establishing a
 biodiesel production facility in south-east Norway. Such a plant could
 come on stream by 2012 at the earliest.

 We consider ourselves to be natural partners as far as wood-based
 biodiesel is concerned. Hydro has wide experience derived from the
 construction and operation of major processing plants and from the
 quest to find new forms of energy. Norske Skog has considerable
 expertise when it comes to wood purchasing and treating wood pulp, say
 senior vice president Alexandra Bech Gjørv of Hydro and vice president
 Terje Engevik of Norske Skog.

 A technically superior product

 The production of biodiesel is currently based on rapeseed or other
 oil-based raw materials. Wood-based biodiesel production requires the
 development of new technology. Once this technology is in place, it
 will be possible to offer an even better product than today?s biodiesel.

 Today only a five-percent biodiesel tank mixture is available.
 Wood-based biodiesel will give us a technically superior product
 without such limitations. By using timber we can also utilize a much
 greater proportion of the raw material and considerably reduce
 greenhouse gas emissions compared with biodiesel produced from rapeseed
 or other plant oils. This means that wood-based biodiesel will be a an
 even more environmentally friendly fuel than today?s biodiesel, the
 two companies say in a press release.

 NEW ENERGY: Alexandra Bech Gjørv is responsible for Hydro's efforts to
 develop renewable energy. (Photo: Kåre Foss)


 Long road to completion

 The road to completion of a possible production plant is, however, a
 long one. To begin with, collaboration between the two companies
 involves a feasibility study that will primarily provide an overview of
 the technologies available in the market, identify the availability of
 raw materials, and create a realistic picture of the external governing
 conditions that must be in place in order to reach an investment
 decision.

 CO2 emissions represent a climate threat that affects all of us, and
 we can see that the political will exists to promote biodiesel as an
 environmentally friendly alternative to regular fuels. There is great
 potential for biodiesel in the market of the future, but if this market
 is going to materialize we are in need of a sound, long-term operating
 framework from the authorities, state Bech Gjørv and Engevik.


 Author: Lars Nermoen
 Published: 2006-05-26


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/




___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search

Re: [Biofuel] Biodiesel from wood

2006-06-02 Thread Steve Knox
Jan,

  I am the wrong person to answer those questions. I think they are using 
gasification and then F-T, but that is just a guess on my part. I live in 
the White Mountains of New Hampshire, and we are exploring using low grade 
wood (woodchips) as the feedstock for ethanol production. We are leaning 
towards gasification. Does anyone in the group have any comments on that 
technology?

Steve Knox

- Original Message - 
From: Jan Warnqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 7:33 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Biodiesel from wood


Hello Steve et al,
if  my memory isn¨t fooling me, is there a fatty acid fraction in tall oil.
The composition of this reminds very much of that of soy bean oil. But it
takes a lot of distilling and fractionizing to get this fatty acid fraction
clean enough. Wood is more suitable for ethanol production I think.
Jan Warnqvist
- Original Message - 
From: Steve Knox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Biodiesel from wood


I believe that there is a company in Germany (CHOREN) who makes biodiesel
from wood. If my memory is correct, they're getting about 60 or so gallons
per ton. A major oil company has bought an interest in the company.

Steve
- Original Message - 
From: Zeke Yewdall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 10:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Biodiesel from wood


Using wood as feedstock means using either lignin or cellulose, right?
 If so, alot of stuff could be made into biodiesel -- grass, weeds,
cardboard, etc...  Thermo catalytic cracking is the only thing I can
think of that could do this.  Unless they have some fancy microbes
that can digest lignin and give oil?

I also remember that in WWII germany was trying to distill gasoline
substitutes from pine trees -- I thought this was more like turpentine
though, derived more from the sap than the wood?   I'm not an expert
on this by any means, but perhaps someone else remembers exactly what
they were doing.

Zeke

On 6/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Has anyone heard of such a thing? It says Wood-based biodiesel
 production requires the development of new technology. Are they on to
 something or are they still working out if this is even possible?

 Steve

 http://snipurl.com/r8b3

 (2006-05-26) Hydro and Norske Skog have agreed to carry out a joint
 feasibility study relating to the production of biodiesel from wood.
 The intention is to identify the feasibility of establishing a
 biodiesel production facility in south-east Norway. Such a plant could
 come on stream by 2012 at the earliest.

 We consider ourselves to be natural partners as far as wood-based
 biodiesel is concerned. Hydro has wide experience derived from the
 construction and operation of major processing plants and from the
 quest to find new forms of energy. Norske Skog has considerable
 expertise when it comes to wood purchasing and treating wood pulp, say
 senior vice president Alexandra Bech Gjørv of Hydro and vice president
 Terje Engevik of Norske Skog.

 A technically superior product

 The production of biodiesel is currently based on rapeseed or other
 oil-based raw materials. Wood-based biodiesel production requires the
 development of new technology. Once this technology is in place, it
 will be possible to offer an even better product than today?s biodiesel.

 Today only a five-percent biodiesel tank mixture is available.
 Wood-based biodiesel will give us a technically superior product
 without such limitations. By using timber we can also utilize a much
 greater proportion of the raw material and considerably reduce
 greenhouse gas emissions compared with biodiesel produced from rapeseed
 or other plant oils. This means that wood-based biodiesel will be a an
 even more environmentally friendly fuel than today?s biodiesel, the
 two companies say in a press release.

 NEW ENERGY: Alexandra Bech Gjørv is responsible for Hydro's efforts to
 develop renewable energy. (Photo: Kåre Foss)


 Long road to completion

 The road to completion of a possible production plant is, however, a
 long one. To begin with, collaboration between the two companies
 involves a feasibility study that will primarily provide an overview of
 the technologies available in the market, identify the availability of
 raw materials, and create a realistic picture of the external governing
 conditions that must be in place in order to reach an investment
 decision.

 CO2 emissions represent a climate threat that affects all of us, and
 we can see that the political will exists to promote biodiesel as an
 environmentally friendly alternative to regular fuels. There is great
 potential for biodiesel in the market of the future, but if this market
 is going to materialize we are in need of a sound, long-term operating
 framework from the authorities, state Bech Gjørv

Re: [Biofuel] Biodiesel from wood

2006-06-02 Thread Steve Knox
Hi Bob,

  Canaan isn't too far away. Yes, methanol is quite available from wood, and 
seems to be an older technology. Apparently the production costs are 
attractive. There is a professor at Dartmouth, not too far away from Canaan, 
who uses enzymes to produce ethanol from pulp sludge. There is at least one 
start up company in the US who claims to produce about 100 gallons of 
ethanol per ton of wood. They use gasification. To the best of my knowledge, 
they have no plants up and running, and I think their statements are based 
on lab results. What makes ethanol from wood attractive is the low feedstock 
costs. Since trees use only solar energy to grow, the initial EROEI should 
be more attractive, but production costs may nullify that to some extent. 
Everything that I have read, seems to indicate that ethanol from cellulose 
is not that far away.Dynamotive, in British Columbia uses a pyrolysis system 
to produce bio-oil. They are working with a German company to convert the 
bio-oil in biodiesel. According to a press release, initial results were 
very encouraging.

Steve Knox

- Original Message - 
From: bob allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 9:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Biodiesel from wood



Howdy Steve

gasification of cellulose forms methanol, not ethanol, right? hydrolysis of 
the
cellulose/hemicellulose then fermentation would yield ethanol, but the 
processes are quite different.


btw, the white mountains is a beautiful place. I lived in Canaan NH for a 
couple of years, many yrs
ago.

Steve Knox wrote:
 Jan,

   I am the wrong person to answer those questions. I think they are using
 gasification and then F-T, but that is just a guess on my part. I live in
 the White Mountains of New Hampshire, and we are exploring using low grade
 wood (woodchips) as the feedstock for ethanol production. We are leaning
 towards gasification. Does anyone in the group have any comments on that
 technology?

 Steve Knox

 - Original Message - 
 From: Jan Warnqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 7:33 AM
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Biodiesel from wood


 Hello Steve et al,
 if  my memory isn¨t fooling me, is there a fatty acid fraction in tall 
 oil.
 The composition of this reminds very much of that of soy bean oil. But it
 takes a lot of distilling and fractionizing to get this fatty acid 
 fraction
 clean enough. Wood is more suitable for ethanol production I think.
 Jan Warnqvist
 - Original Message - 
 From: Steve Knox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 12:17 PM
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Biodiesel from wood


 I believe that there is a company in Germany (CHOREN) who makes biodiesel
 from wood. If my memory is correct, they're getting about 60 or so gallons
 per ton. A major oil company has bought an interest in the company.

 Steve
 - Original Message - 
 From: Zeke Yewdall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 10:30 PM
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Biodiesel from wood


 Using wood as feedstock means using either lignin or cellulose, right?
  If so, alot of stuff could be made into biodiesel -- grass, weeds,
 cardboard, etc...  Thermo catalytic cracking is the only thing I can
 think of that could do this.  Unless they have some fancy microbes
 that can digest lignin and give oil?

 I also remember that in WWII germany was trying to distill gasoline
 substitutes from pine trees -- I thought this was more like turpentine
 though, derived more from the sap than the wood?   I'm not an expert
 on this by any means, but perhaps someone else remembers exactly what
 they were doing.

 Zeke

 On 6/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Has anyone heard of such a thing? It says Wood-based biodiesel
 production requires the development of new technology. Are they on to
 something or are they still working out if this is even possible?

 Steve

 http://snipurl.com/r8b3

 (2006-05-26) Hydro and Norske Skog have agreed to carry out a joint
 feasibility study relating to the production of biodiesel from wood.
 The intention is to identify the feasibility of establishing a
 biodiesel production facility in south-east Norway. Such a plant could
 come on stream by 2012 at the earliest.

 We consider ourselves to be natural partners as far as wood-based
 biodiesel is concerned. Hydro has wide experience derived from the
 construction and operation of major processing plants and from the
 quest to find new forms of energy. Norske Skog has considerable
 expertise when it comes to wood purchasing and treating wood pulp, say
 senior vice president Alexandra Bech Gjørv of Hydro and vice president
 Terje Engevik of Norske Skog.

 A technically superior product

 The production of biodiesel is currently based on rapeseed or other
 oil-based raw materials. Wood-based biodiesel production requires

Re: [Biofuel] New Biodiesel Catalyst

2006-05-12 Thread Steve Racz
Actually, you were heading in the right direction, Zeke.

All conifers are technically softwoods, period. Softwoods are distinguished 
from other plants by their reproduction method. All softwoods are cone 
bearing.

Hardwoods are flower bearing. As a general rule of thumb, if it's a broadleaf 
or also very roughly, if it's deciduous, it's probably a hardwood (don't be 
fooled though, there are many exceptions in both camps - for example here in 
New Zealand most of the indigenous hardwoods, except for one are evergreen 
and on the other side, Larches and some cypresses, both conifers, are 
deciduous)

The term softwood, though has little bearing on the hardness of the wood, 
though in general, they are softer than hardwoods. Again, exceptions abound. 
Balsa is a hardwood, Yew which is harder than most hardwoods is a softwood.

Confused yet?

Having said that all of the trees you mentioned are hardwoods and therefore 
fine for producing lye.

Now, I'm not an expert on making lye from wood ashes but veside the JtF info, 
I did find this on the net regarding softwood vs hardwood ashes for 
soapmaking:
http://www.endtimesreport.com/making_lye.html

Soft wood ashes yield a lye that will only produce soft soap. Hardwood ash 
lye will make harder soap for bars, and the best ash of all is from seaweed, 
such as kelp. Kelp ash lye produces an extremely hard, durable soap.

I can't quite reconcile that with the info on JtF because this might suggest 
that hardwood ash would contain more NaOH than softwood - which for soap 
making would be far better, but maybe lye from softwood ash would be better 
for biofuel production? Maybe someone else can clarify this. I would imagine 
that most of the lye making techniques from the past using wood ashes had 
soap making as a goal. Maybe softwoods just don't produce as much lye? or not 
just the type of lye affects the hardness of soap? I'm beyond my realm of 
knowledge at this point, so more questions than answers.

In any case, your source would be fine.

Steve

On Saturday 13 May 2006 01:57 am, Zeke Yewdall wrote:
Often all broadleaf trees are called hardwoods, and all conifers are
called softwoods, but that's not really true.  For example, aspens
have much softer wood than do larch.  I'm not sure of a technical
definition -- a certain hardness or strength or something?  Or in this
case it seems like we're looking for a certain chemical composition,
which could vary with soil type as well?

Z

On 5/11/06, Scott Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm not an expert in these matters, but I know that Oak and I think Walnut
 and Maple are hardwoods.  I'm not sure about elm and cherry.

 Sounds to me like it'd be a good source.

 --Scott Burton

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason  Katie
 Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 4:57 PM
 To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] New Biodiesel Catalyst

 my father is a forester, and is very much involved with resource management
 (hes the coordinator) at a forest preserve where i grew up, every three
 years a logging company is called in to thin out a small section of the
 park, and these sections are rotated every cycle. my father collects the
 tops from the trees that are removed and cuts them for firewood, which is
 all oak, walnut, maple, cherry, and elm. would this group of woods be a
 suitable supply of ash for KOH? i know the article calls for hardwood, but
 there are some non-pine varieties that dont qualify.

 anyway, im rambling. this supply would be a good way to heat an alcohol
 distillery or even just basic home heating, but there need not be any real
 waste of energy in the pursuit of wood ash, and anyone with a rain barrel
 can make their own KOH.


 there are a thousand ways around any obstacle but the most fitting is the
 least obvious.

 Jason


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

 --
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.5/333 - Release Date: 5/5/2006


 --
 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.6/337 - Release Date: 5/11/2006





 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
 messages): http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org

Re: [Biofuel] New Biodiesel Catalyst

2006-05-09 Thread Steve Racz
I hope it leads to some good results as well.

The second article from the Iowa State shed much more light on it and I'm glad 
John found it and passed it on.

I'm not trying to be negative. We need more Mr.Lins. I just wish that with his 
knowledge and training he could remain focused on research rather than having 
to split his time starting a company and campaigning for research dollars to 
continue his work. On the other hand having a reality check with new ideas to 
see if they produce economically viable results in the marketplace is 
important too.

I wish Mr.Lin well but just think of the progress if we threw some real 
dollars at this area - like for example a fraction of the military and 
defense research spending.

Steve

On Monday 08 May 2006 10:55 am, JJJN wrote:
Hello Steve,
Yea it a bummer to see our think tanks beg, but the bottom line is if
they start producing the catalyst for sale, chances are we can buy it,
not so different than going to your local chemical supply and buying KOH
eh?  I think Mr Lin is trying to use his minute in the limelight to
express what they have done and give the State a good kicking in the
butt to start supporting what they at the university do (Academics vs
Sports)  and after the Hawkeyes Basketball season why not?  I don't
agree with -see below...
Best
Jim

Steve Racz wrote:
Here is the article online (using snipurl!)

http://snipurl.com/q4st

If the catalyst is reusable, but only 20 times, what happens then? Can the
catalyst be recycled?

The details are vague but it seems that this is intentional as it seems Mr.
Lin and his colleagues and especially the University of Iowa are trying to
cash in on their research, not share it.

Sorry if I sound like a cynic, but the article sounds more like a free
informercial touting the benefits of university and industry collaboration
(read - how to raise $$$ for the University) with the work with renewable
fuels being only the buzzword to bind it together.

Not that I don't think that there shouldn't be collaboration, it's that this
is blatantly using biodiesel research as a headliner and not much else.

Not much else? Then Why is the Coop going to start Commercially testing
the Catalyst?

 I'm
actually saddened that with all the blah, blah about being addicted to oil,
that begging is still required by universities for funding of research that
seems so basic and that people like Mr.Lin are forced into the commercial
world when clearly it's not ready for commercialization.

Right the catalyst is not ready for commercialization but it is ready to
test for that purpose.  Please don't misunderstand me, I hope it becomes
available but until the next 1000 yards of research and testing is
complete I am not going to cancel any orders for KOH.

It does state :

Grants from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the U.S. Department of
 Energy and the state's Iowa Values Fund have helped support the ISU
 researchers' work.

but that doesn't stop them from saying this:

If the work with West Central shows the catalysts will work on a commercial
scale, Lin may form a company to produce the catalysts.

But that, as well as continuing research on campus, will take significant
funding, he and others said.

If we could get support from the state and from these local companies,
 there is no reason why it would not stay here, Lin said. I see
 opportunity in Iowa.

Steve

On Sunday 07 May 2006 03:35 pm, JJJN wrote:
My mother in law sent me an article by Anne Fitzgerald writing for the
(Des Moines?) Register.

 The article states that Victor Lin and two fellow University of Iowa
Chemists have created a new catalyst that is reusable (20 times) and can
be filtered.  The catalyst will be quite a bit more expensive than what
we are using now but will pay out over time because of the reuse. West
Central cooperative is going to test the catalyst on a commercial scale.

Anne Fitzgerald can be reached at 515 284 8122 or at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This sounds very much like the  glucose/carbon/sulfur carbon compound.
BUT I do not know if it is or something new.

Well lets hope this becomes available to us all very soon.

My best
Jim.

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
 messages): http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

-- 
Steve Racz
(03) 383 8167
[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Biofuel] New Biodiesel Catalyst

2006-05-07 Thread Steve Racz
Here is the article online (using snipurl!)

http://snipurl.com/q4st

If the catalyst is reusable, but only 20 times, what happens then? Can the 
catalyst be recycled?

The details are vague but it seems that this is intentional as it seems Mr. 
Lin and his colleagues and especially the University of Iowa are trying to 
cash in on their research, not share it.

Sorry if I sound like a cynic, but the article sounds more like a free 
informercial touting the benefits of university and industry collaboration 
(read - how to raise $$$ for the University) with the work with renewable 
fuels being only the buzzword to bind it together.

Not that I don't think that there shouldn't be collaboration, it's that this 
is blatantly using biodiesel research as a headliner and not much else. I'm 
actually saddened that with all the blah, blah about being addicted to oil, 
that begging is still required by universities for funding of research that 
seems so basic and that people like Mr.Lin are forced into the commercial 
world when clearly it's not ready for commercialization.

It does state :

Grants from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the U.S. Department of Energy 
and the state's Iowa Values Fund have helped support the ISU researchers' 
work.

but that doesn't stop them from saying this:

If the work with West Central shows the catalysts will work on a commercial 
scale, Lin may form a company to produce the catalysts.

But that, as well as continuing research on campus, will take significant 
funding, he and others said.

If we could get support from the state and from these local companies, there 
is no reason why it would not stay here, Lin said. I see opportunity in 
Iowa.

Steve

On Sunday 07 May 2006 03:35 pm, JJJN wrote:
My mother in law sent me an article by Anne Fitzgerald writing for the
(Des Moines?) Register.

 The article states that Victor Lin and two fellow University of Iowa
Chemists have created a new catalyst that is reusable (20 times) and can
be filtered.  The catalyst will be quite a bit more expensive than what
we are using now but will pay out over time because of the reuse. West
Central cooperative is going to test the catalyst on a commercial scale.

Anne Fitzgerald can be reached at 515 284 8122 or at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This sounds very much like the  glucose/carbon/sulfur carbon compound.
BUT I do not know if it is or something new.

Well lets hope this becomes available to us all very soon.

My best
Jim.

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

-- 
Steve Racz
(03) 383 8167
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] [SPAM] Re: Pollution: Where have all the baby boysgone?

2006-04-06 Thread Steve Knox



You're entitled to your opinion sexist! 


Steve

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Gary L. 
  Green 
  To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org 
  
  Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 1:43 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [Biofuel] [SPAM] Re: 
  Pollution: Where have all the baby boysgone?
  Just my opinion but girls are better anyway.
  
  
  
  On 6 Apr 2006, at 07:58, mark manchester wrote:
  

  Every year, thousands of British babies who should 
  be boys are born
  girls. The answer to this mystery could lie in a 
  small town in
  Canada. Geoffrey Lean 
  reports
  
  

  ___Biofuel mailing 
  listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel 
  at Journey to 
  Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the 
  combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
  messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Wet Composting

2006-03-07 Thread Steve Racz
Composting can be achieved either aerobically or anaerobically. They are 
different processes, require different conditions and organisms and the 
organisms themselves have different requirements.

To achieve a more complete decomposition in a shorter period of time, you can 
help the aerobic organisms by replenishing their oxygen supply and their 
moisture requirements. You do not need to add additional organic material 'to 
ensure a complete reaction' if you start with a proper mix in the first 
place.(Technically it's not a reaction anyway, more of a digestion). If you 
start an aerobic pile and let the organisms get to the point where they have 
consumed all of the oxygen and moisture and have produced heat as a 
byproduct, then you get into a more anaerobic decomposition. If you turn the 
pile, it becomes an aerobic decomposition again. What's my point? If you 
build a proper aerobic compost mix and just leave it, nature will take of it 
eventually- without a question. Why work hard to do what nature already does 
so well.

Anaerobic composting is a bit more complex but can be aided with the addition 
of certain microbes. Anaerobic composting is what occurs in a garbage dump - 
with at least one byproduct being methane. I think in your scenario, the 
aerobic microbes would drown.

Why the interest in just tea bags anyway, though? There is plenty of free 
material available for composting - leaves, grass, straw, vegetable scraps, 
sawdust, woodchips, hair - should be easy enough to collect enough 'browns' 
and 'greens' to make a good pile. For free sources, try your local grocer, 
barbershop, woodshop - heck I used to steal bags of leaves in the fall from 
the neighbors and the pumpkins and strawbales after Hallowe'en  and I had a 
container left out in the office kitchen area to collect coffee 
grinds/teabags. No problem composting these.

A local entrepreneur in the Dallas area had the local Dr.Pepper bottling plant 
pay to deliver the spoiled batches of syrup to his quarry which they 
otherwise would have had to treat before dumping and charged the timber 
industry to dump their sawdust in same. He turned the pile with bulldozers , 
then bagged and sold the finished compost. Money to bring it in, money to 
take it away. Garbage into gold using nature! Brilliant! 

And just so we don't stray off alternate fuels too far - the methane off 
garbage dumps can be recovered - this is nothing new - my local community 
here in New Zealand is tapping a closed dump and piping the methane 2 kms to 
a nearby community center to heat the pool.

If you include an aerobic compost pile in say a greenhouse, it can provide an 
alternate source of heat while being close for disposal of all your gardening 
'waste'. 

Haven't found a way to have it power my Toyota Surf turbo diesel yet though.

-- 
Steve Racz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Tuesday 07 March 2006 03:47 pm, Rexis Tree wrote:
Composting required aerobic condition and well balanced C-N ratio to carry
out. And require active turning the compost pile to mix in oxygen and fresh
organic material to ensure a complete reaction. If compost too wet and soak
in water will turn the pile into anaerobic compost which result in none
complete and smelly compost.

But how about this one? If i soak a lot of organic material in water, bubble
air thru the water, and perhaps keep it warm at 35 C. Will it create any
compost in the end? In theory the bacterial should get enough oxygen to
undergo aerobic reaction.

And what is tea bag's CN ratio? I plan to collect lots of tea grounds to do
compost, perhaps i will get it from restaurants or coffee shops.


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Birth of an Industry

2006-02-22 Thread Steve Racz
Hi Kenji,

I've read some of the report you quoted. I guess it must be kept in mind that 
this is a submission from a private enterprise to the government on 
recommendations for expanding the industry in Canada, both from a producer 
perspective and from a consumer perspective. It is certainly not legislation.

A further point is that they recommended registration and certification for 
biofuel/producers that enters the fuel distribution system. This would take 
home-brew systems pretty much off the radar screen from this kind of 
scrutiny.

Of course if this were to turn into legislation, it would still leave out a 
whole class of producer - that operated like a the equivalent of the beer 
micro-brewery ie: a small commercial producer selling direct to the public. 
Surely we would expect some type of standards to be adhered to if fuel was 
being sold to the public.

I agree with you, however, that if certifications and registration were made 
universal, that could be to the detriment of the home producer (depending on 
how costly this becomes) and that would not be desirable. 

The solutions to world energy requirements post cheap oil (ie: today) has to 
involve lots of different solutions at the local level with local people who 
care about their local environment( and therefore the global environment). We 
can't leave it to big business to solve this one because we already know 
where their values are and what results that leads to.

Steve


On Wednesday 22 February 2006 02:04 pm, Kenji James Fuse wrote:
So here's the latest I've found for Canada. The push is on for the
government of Canada to establish a Federal registration and
certification program for all biodiesel producers, importers to guarantee
all biodiesel into the Canadian petroleum fuel distribution system meets
the accepted North American quality standard ASTM D6751.

Quality = Good
Registration and Certification at the Government Level = BAD

Here's the full report:

http://www.www.canadianbioenergy.com/Resources/
   DEVELOPING_A_CANADIAN_BIODIESEL_INDUSTRY.pdf

My worry is the micro- and small-scale producer (ie backyard brewer) is
going to be penalized if not criminalized, very shortly in Canada.

Let's have our own accreditation system so I can talk to my elected
offical and make sure we aren't screwed over in favour of big tax dollar
lobbyists!

Kenji Fuse


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

-- 
Steve Racz
(03) 383 8167
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Looking for still materials in Houston, TX

2006-02-15 Thread Steve Racz
Mark,

I llved in Dallas for 10 years and I found that Apex Supply always had what I 
needed. I also worked for Home Depot so I understand that they don't always 
have the specialty items.

http://www.apexsupplyco.com/branches.htm

They have several branches around Texas, the closest to you is Austin but 
perhaps they can either ship parts to you or you can contact them for a 
suggestoin on a closer source in Houston.

Steve


On Thursday 16 February 2006 08:43 am, Mark Kennedy wrote:
Home Depot was my first stop.  I have three of them within 10 mins of my
house.  the home depot's around here only carry copper pipe up to 1
diameter.  1.5 and 2 is uncommon in residential use here because of the
climate, i suppose.

i wish i knew a plumber here... but...

pvc is plentiful but i have seen recommendations against it.  anything wrong
with building one out of pvc for first-time short-term use?

-Mark

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Zeke Yewdall
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 12:16 PM
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Looking for still materials in Houston, TX


They all look like standard hardware store items to me, but I'm also
spoiled by a really good hardware store in town.  Have you tried Home
Depot?  They might have stuff which could be made to work.

On 2/15/06, Mark Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I am looking for materials for constructing an ethanol still out of copper
 pipe and fittings like the one shown below:
 http://www.moonshine-still.com/

 materials list is here, the second one down on the page: Internal Reflux
 Still:
 http://www.moonshine-still.com/Appendix%201.htm

 any ideas where I can find the materials in Houston?  i cannot buy

wholesale

 and that is the only source i have found.

 thanks
 Mark


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000

messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

-- 
Steve Racz
(03) 383 8167
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Diesel pick-ups in Canada

2005-12-03 Thread steve reimer
Hey Felix,
I'm interested. Where abouts are you in Canada? I'd like more details on the truck and the cars. 
SteveSteve Reimer


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.orgTo: Biofuel@sustainablelists.orgSubject: Re: [Biofuel] Diesel pick-ups in CanadaDate: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 12:23:14 -0500



Happy day Steve!
A neighbor has a full-size (dodge cummins I believe)one for sale... would you like me to get more info on it?
Peace
Good luck!
Felix
P.S. and I have two diesel mercedes for sale, should you be interested...
___Biofuel mailing listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel at Journey to Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Diesel pick-ups in Canada

2005-11-29 Thread steve reimer

Stan wrote "I don'tunderstand why Toyota doesn't just sell a new diesel pickup here".

Has anyone visited a Toyota dealer and asked that question. I think I will when I get back to Canada in 3 weeks. Alternatively, I wonder if they (Toyota) would have a cheaper way of importing a diesel engine.Steve Reimer







From:Stanley baer [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To:Biofuel@sustainablelists.orgTo:Biofuel@sustainablelists.orgSubject:Re: [Biofuel] Diesel pick-ups in CanadaDate:Tue, 29 Nov 2005 08:43:46 -0500There is no easy way to get a small diesel pickup in southern ontario.I am driving an isuzu that I put a VW diesel into.Next time i ambuying a Toyota and putting one of those imported used diesel enginesfrom Japan.Even the used engines sell for $3000-$4000, not to mentionthe problem of finding a good Toyota with a bad engine.I don'tunderstand why Toyota doesn't just sell a new diesel pickup 
here.stan___Biofuel mailing listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel at Journey to Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] Diesel pick-ups in Canada

2005-11-28 Thread steve reimer

Any suggestions on where I can find a small to mid sized dieselpick-up truck in Ontario, Canada? In the truck trader, I only found 2 or 3 older trucks with over 300 000km.Steve Reimer



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] Biodiesel Kits

2005-05-10 Thread steve

I'm anxious to get started in learning how to make biodiesel, and some web
searches have turned up outfits like www.makebiodiesel.org, which market
complete kits.  Are these things really worth it, or are they selling junk
to the uninitiated?

-Steve

___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


RE: [Biofuel] Hemp oil

2005-05-09 Thread Steve Hess

I have a question that I have been debating with a biology teacher.  Is
Hemp illegal to grow in the US.  If it is not, where is it grown and
what are the exceptions to being allowed to grow it.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of bob allen
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 11:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Hemp oil


I won't vouch for the accuracy, but the numbers don't seem unreasonable

Iodine Value:   166.5

http://www.ganjaland.com/oil.htm



JanWarnqvist wrote:
 Hwllo everybody.
 Does anybody know of a good average iodine number for hemp oil ?
 
 AGERATEC AB
 Jan Warnqvist
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable): 
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 
 
 



-- 
Bob Allen
http://ozarker.org/bob

Science is what we have learned about how to keep
from fooling ourselves - Richard Feynman
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


Re: [Biofuel] uses for charcoal -- (was) simple cook stoves

2005-05-07 Thread steve

I'm afraid not.  The charcoal used in filtration is activated charcoal,
which is made by burning bone or similar material in an oxygen-deprived
environment.  If you try to filter water through charcoal briquettes or
wood, I believe the output is LYE.  You could make soap with the lye I
suppose, but if you drink the output you'll be a very unhappy camper.

-Steve


 A while back, we had a discussion on simple cook stoves.
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/46479/1

 I was wondering if some of the charcoal collected from the stove could be
 used as a water purifier. I quickly checked the archives to see if it was
 already discussed and didn't find anything.

 Mike

 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


Re: [Biofuel] cell phones and safety

2005-05-07 Thread steve

It is indeed important to maintain perspective.  Personally, I don't like
to see people drive and talk on the phone at the same time -- it's a
visible sign of a disregard for their own safety and the safety of others
on the road.  But if you review the statistics and studies on the NHTSA
(National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) website, it's plain to
see that talking on a cell phone isn't the holy grail of driving abuse
that some make it out to be.  For example, the NHTSA estimates that driver
distraction from ALL sources contributes to 25 percent of all
police-reported traffic crashes.  They do say that cell phone usage can
present a significant cognitive distraction, but the study also admits
that cell phone usage may be no more of a distraction than talking to
someone else in the vehicle.  Furthermore, in a controlled study,
comparing eating and operating a cell phone to continuously operating a CD
player, it was found that the CD player operation was more distracting
than the other activities.  In a test track study conducted by NHTSA, the
results showed that manual dialing was about as distracting as
grooming/eating, but less distracting than reading or changing CDs.

This leads me to wonder, despite my great dislike for drivers who yap on
the phone while driving, if cell phone usage isn't the real culprit --
it's the drivers themselves.  Some people are prone to distraction, and if
it wasn't a cell phone they might be daydreaming, or flipping the radio
around, or chatting with someone else in the car.  What we might have to
consider is that people may be at fault, not cell phones, and while
banning cell phone usage while driving may placate the public screaming
for action, it may also be that those same people who would distract
themselves using a cell phone may find something else to take its place.

-Steve


 Actually, the DOT did a study of accidents caused by distracted drivers a
 few years ago.  About 80% were caused by distractions outside the car
 (billboards, that woman walking down the street, etc.).  Of the 20% caused
 by distractions inside the car, the top two were eating in the car and
 adjusting the car stereo.  Cell phones were responsible for just over 10%
 the number of accidents caused by eating while driving.  If we're enacting
 laws, lets start with McDonald's drive-thrus and car stereos.

 Brian
 BRIAN THOMAS
 - Original Message -
 From: Larry Foran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 6:22 AM
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] cell phones and safety


 Kim,
   I continue to be amazed by the disregard for others demonstrated by
 most drivers.  I commute 30 miles to and from work each day.  I see
 people reading books, talking on phones, and/or putting on makeup
 while driving.  Our society seems to think that multi-taksing extends
 into their driving time.
   Talking on the phone take more attention than having a conversation
 with another passenger, but people still do not seem to care.  I can
 see that laws similar to drunk driving laws will need to be enacted
 before people understand the gravity of their actions.

 Larry

 On 5/6/05, Kim  Garth Travis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Greetings Friends,

 I find myself in need of doing a little preaching today.  Sorry, but for
 me, this is the best way I can deal with the horror of last night.

 Last night a young women of 21 or so was driving down the highway
 talking
 on her cell phone and definitely driving with no care and attention to
 what
 she was doing.  I guess she thought that by staying mostly on the
 shoulder,
 it was safe to drive and talk.  Then she dropped her cell phone and
 reached
 for it.  A man, barely 10 years her senior who was riding his bicycle,
 died
 because of her actions.  Her life will never be the same, either.

 As for me, I can not work to erase the memory of what I saw until he has
 had his day in court.

 Please, turn your cell phones off while driving.  It was not just that
 she
 dropped that cell phone.  She did not see the cyclist, because she was
 distracted by her conversation.  He was plainly visible long before he
 was
 hit, I know, I watched the accident about to happen and it did.

 Bright Blessings,
 Kim

 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel

 Biofuel at Journey

Re: [Biofuel] Nuclear Waste Of Time

2005-05-06 Thread steve

An interesting thread.  Maybe I can offer a perspective on this.  I've
spent many years in the Foreign Service, having lived in many places
overseas, including Africa and Europe.  I've seen America from the
inside-out and outside-in.  My observation is that the problem isn't that
Americans aren't conservation-conscious or that Americans or American
companies have a penchant for destroying the planet.  The problem is that
American society has developed, more by default rather than by deliberate
design, an appetite for energy consumption.  For example, almost without
exception every place I've live abroad you don't need a car to go to the
grocery store -- or if you do, you don't have to go very far.  In the
United States, unless you live in an intensely urban area, the necessities
of life are spread out by many miles.  We think nothing of getting in the
car and driving 10 miles to the grocery store, and we're so used to it
that many Americans can't imagine what it must be like to just walk down
the street for the same thing.  That's just one example, but what I'm
trying to say is that America tends to give off an impression of being
excessive and wasteful, but the truth of the matter is that while we are
excessive by much of the rest of the world's standards, it isn't because
Americans want to be that way, it's because that's all we know. 
Furthermore, I think perspective helps sometimes -- if you want to see
REAL waste and ecologic corruption, go to Africa.  I lived in Africa for
over four years, and the level of ecological destruction that goes on over
there makes Americans look like conservationist saints.

For me, anyway, I intend to do everything I can to make a difference.  My
next house will have a rainwater harvesting system, solar hot water, and
ground-source heat pump.  I joined this list so I could learn how to
produce my own biodiesel, so I can power my vehicles without burning up
fossil fuels.

-Steve

 Let's unravel. Climate change is only one of four interconnected and
 massive problems facing the planet. If the only issue we were worried
 about was climate change, maybe it would be worth considering nuclear
 power. But the problem is much bigger. The problem is embedded in the
 inefficiency and overconsumption built into the American economy, and
 by extension, the rest of the developed world. The pathway toward a
 sustainable future lies in the developed world becoming more energy
 efficient, while the developing world leapfrogs over the excesses of
 our present economic order.



___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


Re: [Biofuel] Nuclear Waste Of Time

2005-05-06 Thread steve

So true!  But for this to work well enough to make a difference,
significant changes would have to be made to the system of distribution of
goods and services in the United States.  Efficient rail transport in the
United States, similar to what you might find in Europe, only works if the
transport goes where people need to go, and if it is cost-effective.  In
Europe, the rail systems are heavily subsidized by the government, and the
government in turn heavily taxes its citizens.  Take the Netherlands, for
example -- they have a fantastic public transportation system that can
take you just about anywhere you need to go, and it's affordable. 
However, the country is already designed for such a system (stores are
close to the city centers, and the cities are heavily populated), and the
people pay so much in taxes (75% for some!) that tax evasion is a national
sport.  I'm not saying that it won't work in America, but I'm saying that
it will work only in isolated areas or new developments built for such a
thing from the ground-up.  It may be idealistic to imagine well-designed
communities in the U.S., but the realistic viewpoint is that this doesn't
exist and probably won't for the forseeable future.  I believe the answer
is for us to find alternative sources of energy that are cheap enough that
the average person will be interested.

-Steve

 ...much of the inefficiency within the American energy grid is from
 transmission losses. Instead of nuclear, we need to invest in clean
 micro-generation of renewable energy distributed throughout well-designed
 communities that encourage light rail over cars.



___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


RE: [Biofuel] home made fuel cell and other interesting pdf links

2005-04-23 Thread Steve Hess

I am new to this site and have been following and trying to find some
info for a few weeks.  I guess I will just ask.

I have a large farm and a large source of corn and soybeans from
farming.  I am very interested in knowing if there is an economical way
I can either make my own biodiesel or ethanol for my tractors and/or
trucks for my own use and possible sell excess.
Is this a process that would save me $$? Corn and soy prices are very
low so I am losing money growing them.  

Poor dirt farmer in PA,
Steve Hess


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alt.EnergyNetwork
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 6:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Biofuel] home made fuel cell and other interesting pdf links




Hi all,
Just added some new pdf files on how
to make a home made fuel cell, peak oil, hydrogen and future
transportation tech. You can find them here. regards tallex

http://www.alternate-energy.net/pdf03.html






Alternate Energy Resource Network
  1000+ news sources-resources
 updated daily
http://www.alternate-energy.net


Get your daily alternative energy news

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/next_generation_grid

 news  resources  forums

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tomorrow-energy



Alternative Energy Politics

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Alternative_Energy_Politics/




___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


RE: [Biofuel] On-farm biodiesel or ethanol - was RE: home made fuelcell etc

2005-04-23 Thread Steve Hess

Keith,
Thanks for the info.  However, I am a poor farmer not a dumb one.  I do have a 
major variety of crops and corn is a rotation crop.  There is not many 
alternatives to rotation crops.  When I count my time and fuel costs I may make 
a few pennies on the corn but what I would like to do is at least save several 
dollars instead by making my own fuel.
I looked over the list of oil producing seeds.  The top 8 (some I never heard 
of) I do not think can be grown in PA.  I also have to look at the feasibility 
of getting the seed out of the plant.  I grow about 700 acres of pumpkins.  
Pumpkin seeds have 2x the oil as corn.  The only way I know of to get pumpkin 
seeds out of a pumpkin is to carve it open and scoop the out.  That is alot of 
carving and scooping.
 
Does anyone know what is the best oil producing seed that can still be grown in 
PA?
 
Also - Is corn the best product to use to make Ethanol?
 
Steve

-Original Message- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Keith Addison 
Sent: Fri 4/22/2005 11:17 PM 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Cc: 
Subject: [Biofuel] On-farm biodiesel or ethanol - was RE: home made 
fuelcell etc



Hello Steve

I am new to this site and have been following and trying to find some
info for a few weeks.  I guess I will just ask.

Did you try these? At the end of every message:

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Plenty of information for you there.

I have a large farm and a large source of corn and soybeans from
farming.

Not exactly the best energy crops. There's starch and oil in corn
(maize) but a lot more of both in other crops. Soy isn't an
efficient source of oil unless you extract it with hexane, simple
pressing won't do much for you, and soy oil isn't the best feedstock
for biodiesel anyway (semi-drying oil).

On an integrated mixed farm you should be able to produce enough
energy to run the farm and more besides from an ever-changing
assortment of by-products, so it's more or less free. But if you're
growing corn and soy that you're losing money on you're not doing
integrated mixed farming anyway, and it's doubtful that you'd get
more biofuel out of it than the fossil-fuel inputs you're putting
into it.

I am very interested in knowing if there is an economical way
I can either make my own biodiesel or ethanol for my tractors and/or
trucks for my own use and possible sell excess.

Shouldn't be a problem, if you select better energy crops to grow.
There's a very large choice, much detail to be found in the list
archives and the Biofuels section of Journey to Forever, and in the
online Biofuels library.

Is this a process that would save me $$?

Definitely, if you did it right.

Corn and soy prices are very
low so I am losing money growing them.

Grow something else then.

Best wishes

Keith


Poor dirt farmer in PA,
Steve Hess

snip

___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


RE: [Biofuel] Acetone in fuel increases mileage by 15 -35%

2005-04-15 Thread Steve Hess

I doubt the independent retailers know about, or care about fuel
efficiency

steve

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of bob allen
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 10:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Acetone in fuel increases mileage by 15 -35%


there are a lot of independent retailers out there who would love to 
sell more gas if they could advertise it as providing 30 % better 
mileage.  They could even a couple of cents to the price and be ahead on

cost/distance.


enny Dunn wrote:
 Except that the petro industry doesn't really have any interest in you

 getting better mileage.  They certainly aren't telling us any ways to 
 send them less money.
 
 $.02,
 Ken
 
 Michael Redler [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
 
 
You're making sense Bob.
 
 
bob allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if it really worked, which I highly doubt, don't you think somebody
would be blending and selling the mix already?
 
 
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable): 
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 
 
 


-- 
Bob Allen
http://ozarker.org/bob

Science is what we have learned about how to keep
from fooling ourselves - Richard Feynman
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


RE: [Biofuel] soap, glycerine by-product and how my farm is

2005-04-11 Thread Steve Hess

Rob
I have a very damp basement and would be interested in your plans for
the dehumidifier.
Steve Hess

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kim  Garth Travis
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 8:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] soap, glycerine by-product and how my farm is


Greetings Rob,

Rob wrote:


 
 Would you like plans for a VERY cheap dehumidifier (probably less than

 $20) that can take out over a gallon of water a day (depending on 
 humidity) ??
 
I would very much like the plans.  How much energy does it use?  We do 
have an electric humidifyer, but it sucks powers like an AC unit. 
Necessary to use, at times, but I hate plugging the darn thing in.

 Incidently we are having an underground (Earth Sheltered) house built,

 and below 4' the tempreture is around 50 oF (coldest)in Winter and 64 
 oF (warmest) in summer, so maybe even a Storm Cellar type structure 
 built into the ground may work.
 
Must be nice.  With our heavy clay, heavy rains and flat land that is 
slightly lower than all our neighbors, this is not a good idea.

 Rob
 
Bright Blessings,
Kim

___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


Re: Re: [Biofuel] Kids Opt for Kerry

2004-10-22 Thread Steve Spence

Thank you for your kind words, Keith. That is exactly what I was talking about. 
Disagree with your politics, and you attack the person. enough vitriole, I'm 
out of here.



   ---Original Message---
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kids Opt for Kerry
Sent: Oct 21 2004 16:49:37
   
 Steve
 
 It would take too long to go over all the posts that really blow it.
 There are so many of them. I'm going to stick with biofuels and
 related topics, and leave it to the rest of you muckrakers. I'm not
 the one who stirs stuff up, but I sure get beat over the head when I
 ocassionaly object to the stirring that goes on. You sure like it
 one sided.
 
 No, you do. You fling charges and claims about that you don't
 substantiate, when asked to substantiate them you obfuscate. Reason:
 no substance. You've done that here before. This is the truth of it:
 
 In Steve Spence's opinion, there have been half truths and hateful
 misinformationÊÊspread on this list, where many members are not only
 anti-Bush but anti-American, but since, not for the first time, he's
 unable to provide any substance for this nor any instances of it when
 challenged to do so, it's just an empty opinion, based simply on
 Steve's inability to counter views he disagrees with and objects to.
 
 Keith
 
 
 
 = = = Original message = = =
 
 There you go again Steve. (Ronald Reagan, nationally televised debate 
with
 President Carter.)
 
 You know, for a guy that doesn't have enough time to address what he 
stirs
 up, you sure do like to keep that ladle moving.
 
 Please, would you do everyone a very big service and point to the
 half-truths (plural) and misinformation that you are eluding to? And when
 you've addressed those claims, please be so kind as to zero in on what
 aspects are hateful.
 
 I would think that if you take such great acception with what others 
state
 that you would redress those statements specifically and steer clear of
 overly broad and sweeping generalizations.
 
 But then again, that type of evasiveness does serve it's purpose, doesn't
 it? Nothing wrong with a differing in beliefs. But it would be rather 
nice
 to see you put some substantiation in print.
 
 Todd Swearingen
 
 - Original Message -
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 1:48 PM
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kids Opt for Kerry
 
 
  I did not imply that being anti-bush is being anti-american. But we 
have
  many on this list that are both. I don't believe I'm required to 
listen to
  one side, without speaking up for the other side once in a great while.
  Especially when I see half truths and hateful misinformation being 
spread.
  99% of my posts are of biofuel, or alternative living content. Many 
here
  post mostly political rhetoric, and although it's allowed, it does say
  something about that person. On that note, I have an busted inverter to
  repair, or we are on candle light tonight. I'm sure I'm going to get an
  inbox full of response that I won't feel like reading when I have more
  ontopic things to work on.
  
   = = = Original message = = =
  
   Steve,
  
   You have been so long on the list, that you know that the Americans 
are an
   minority. If you looked at the latest international polls, the
   international communities are quite ant-Bush. To say that if you are
   anti-Bush, you are anti-American, is a dirty blow and way under the 
belt
   and it is nothing that suggest or support such a statement. You must 
have
   a
   fairly low opinion of foreigners mental capacity, if you belive 
that we
   cannot keep our opinions about US administration policies and 
Americans in
   general apart. It is you who connects them.
  
   Hakan
  
  
   At 04:30 PM 10/21/2004, you wrote:
  you missed Republicans don't let their kids watch Nickelodeon, they 
have
  more sense than that ;-) which skews the polls to primarily 
democrats. I
  can't prove that claim, but it sounds good. That channel (among 
others)
  will turn there minds to mush. My kids prefer the wings channel, 
wich I
  bet would have given completely different results.
  
  Sorry to see after three years, you still feel it's necesary to 
attack and
  drive away those with opposing (not necessarily wrong) viewpoints.
  
  somebody had to speak up, or folks will think this is the anti-bush,
  anti-american list, not the biofuel list.
  
  = = = Original message = = =
  
  Me thinks you missed the point Steve.
  
  When you say
  
Of course they believe whatever their parents do at that age

[Biofuel] Appeal to Engineers

2004-10-15 Thread Steve Spence

Appeal to Engineers - by V.K.DESAI

We are living in the era of engineers. Progress of science and
technology has created innumerable amenities for happy life. Much of the
comfort and luxuries created by industrial progress is due to the
dedicated efforts of thousand of engineers, technologist and scientist.
Hence, there is no exaggeration in saying that we are living in the era
of engineers of which Africa will come out as the strongest continent.

But the industrial development as seen today is not so innocent. It has
its black side also. Present industrial progress is associated with
exploitation, disparity, unemployment, poverty, centralization,
urbanization, pollution and wars also. Moreover, it makes our life more
and more complex which gives rise to tension in our routine life. In
fact, it encourages materialism and greed for luxurious life at any
cost. So if we assess the industrial progress in totality, we have to
come to the conclusion that its debit side far outweighs its credit
side. This is particularly true for a country like India.

Since centuries, we had the most scientific and well organized economic
structure based on self reliant villages. Crores of people were living
their simple life peacefully in villages. Most of the people had their
own occupation. We have damaged this sound structure heavily in the name
of industrialization. We have disturbed entire village lifestyle by
exploiting masses by breaking their occupations and by concentrating
wealth into handful of industrialists. This has created unemployment,
poverty and disparity. At present our 50 crores of villagers are living
miserable life worse than animals . They are so unfortunate that they
have to sleep with their hungry stomach every day. They are victims of
our so-called industrial development.

I feel that real reason of undesirable consequences of industrial
progress is because engineers are helpless to work for greed of money.
We give more importance to our salaries and to our prospects for our
personal happiness than to consider the impact of our work on society.

I admit that after putting in hard labour for years together to achieve
degree of engineering, we have right to expect something which may
provide us comfortable life. But I have painfully observed that matter
does not end there. Every type of greed has no end. Once engineer gets
comfortable life, he expects more and more comfort and luxuries. We
engineers, never think of the result of our work on society. We
conveniently ignore the consequences of the industrial progress which we
are making even after knowing that our efforts to manufacture certain
machinery or goods or services will result in increasing exploitation,
unemployment and poverty of masses. We are not paying any attention
towards it. We are not accepting any responsibility of increasing evils
of the industrial development. This leads to the conclusion to me that
we are selfish for our own comfortable and luxurious life. To accomplish
it, we are dedicating our entire intelligence and perseverance to foster
the centralized industrial structure, sole purpose of which is to make
profit by exploiting masses without any consideration of morality. In
this way we are cooperating in the advancement or evils in the society.
It is really deplorable that not a few engineers are found who will deny
to work where their work is ultimately going to result into evident
exploitation of masses.

We must ponder over this horrible situation. We must try to find out why
industrial progress results into horrible disparity giving handful of
people too much luxuries and to millions of people only miseries. We
must try to find out why the centralization of wealth and power takes
place due to industrial progress.

But I know that many engineers are not satisfied with their jobs. They
know that their hard labour put for earning their livelihood results
into the exploitation of masses. So they have discontent for their work.
They feel pity for masses. They have sympathy for them. But they feel
themselves helpless in the matter. They do not find any alternative.
They desire to come out of the present situation. But they do not know
how to do it. They feel some vacuum in their life. They feel lack of
morality in their work. Hence, their conscience always rebel against
their job. They are eager to help the poor people either by changing
their job or by starting their own business. But they do not know how to
do it.

I have to specially appeal to such engineers. There are hundreds of
scopes in the present day society for earning your livelihood and
helping the poor people. These vast scopes are in villages. Although our
decentralized rural economic structure has been severely damaged, it is
not completely ruined. It is still living. It is repairable. I am
optimistic that if thousands of Engineers pay enough attention to the
real needs of villages and they vow to work for villages, within two
decades only, entire village based 

Re: [Biofuel] [Biofuels] Hydrogen or Biofuels?

2004-10-14 Thread Steve Spence

Morris is right, Lovins has soot in his eyes.

Steve Spence
http://www.green-trust.org
- Original Message - 
From: Jonathan Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 7:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] [Biofuels] Hydrogen or Biofuels?


 Good one!
 Jonathan

 MH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hydrogen or Biofuels?
 September / October 2004
 By Amory Lovins and David Morris
 Utne magazine

http://www.utne.com/cgi-bin/udt/im.display.printable?client.id=utnestory.id=11334

 Two experts go head-to-head on the future of energy

 In our January-February 2004 issue, we reprinted from Alternet an
 essay by local-economy advocate David Morris, vice president of the
 Institute for Local Self-Reliance, in which he takes aim at the
 advocates of a hydrogen-based economy, asserting, among other things,
 that because large energy interests are poised to dominate the
 process of generating hydrogen from substances like gas, oil, and coal,
 the push to hydrogen will actually be a setback for renewable energy
 from wind power, biomass, and other sources. Energy analyst Amory B.
Lovins,
 CEO of the Rocky Mountain Institute in Snowmass, Colorado, and a
 prominent advocate of hydrogen fuel cell technology, responds.

 FROM AMORY LOVINS

 In voicing skepticism about the role of hydrogen in our energy future,
 my valued friend David Morris makes several points:

 He is understandably frustrated that hydrogen will initially be made
 mainly from natural gas, as 96 percent of U.S. hydrogen is now. But he
 wrongly thinks this will waste energy and increase carbon dioxide
emissions.
 Because fuel cells are two to three times more efficient than gasoline
engines,
 CO2 per mile will actually drop by 40 to 67 percent compared with today's
 gasoline cars -- and much more with efficient car designs.

 He's irritated that nuclear advocates claim they'll be the hydrogen
 producers. But they won't be -- their option costs far too much.

 He's worried that hydrogen might come from coal. This is a real
 possibility later, but by then we will have good ways to keep
 the carbon out of the air.

 Because General Motors likes fuel cells, he assumes that car and
 oil companies are preparing for an oil-based hydrogen future.
 Generally, they're not.

 He thinks hydrogen will be too costly to distribute.
 Wrong -- the Swiss study he cites [which claimed that
 the compacting of this very light and diffuse element for
 storage and transport is too costly and energy-intensive]
 considered only the clearly uneconomic options and ignored
 hydrogen's advantage of more efficient use.

 He thinks a hydrogen transition will need hundreds of billions of
 dollars of new infrastructure. This is a vast overestimate.

 He doesn't recognize hydrogen's important potential to
 accelerate the adoption of renewable energy.

 Many environmentalists suspect the Bush administration's
 enthusiasm for hydrogen serves mainly to distract attention from
 the short-term energy steps they're unwilling to take. It's
 impossible to tell from the outside whether that's true or not,
 but if it is, this self-inflicted wound is not a reason to
 reject a sound hydrogen transition as a complementary part of
 a broader energy strategy starting with aggressive efficiency,
 renewable energy, and distributed resources.

 Many other good and usually well-informed people have written
 similar critiques of hydrogen. A well-documented response,
 Twenty Hydrogen Myths, is free at http://www.rmi.org

 FROM DAVID MORRIS

 My esteemed colleague Amory Lovins and I agree and disagree.
 We both focus on the transportation sector. We both favor a
 dramatic improvement in vehicle efficiency and the
 replacement of gasoline with a domestically produced,
 environmentally benign fuel.

 We disagree on how to achieve these objectives.
 Amory advocates fuel cell vehicles that run on hydrogen.
 I propose hybrid electric vehicles fueled by electricity
 and biofuels like ethanol.

 I believe my strategy is far cheaper and far quicker to
 implement than Amory's. Hybrid vehicles, which use
 electric motors as well as an engine for power, are
 commercially available. They already achieve fuel
 efficiencies as great as those promised by fuel cell cars.
 With modest modifications, hybrids can be made to plug into
 the electric grid to charge their batteries. That allows
 electricity to become their primary fuel and reduces by some
 85 percent the amount of fuel needed by the engine.

 In turn, this allows us to think of biofuels like ethanol as
 replacements for gasoline rather than, as now, simply additives
 to it. Unlike hydrogen, ethanol is already widely available.
 Ethanol is half the price of hydrogen today and may have a
 still lower price a decade from now. Cars that operate on either
 ethanol or gasoline -- or any combination of the two -- can be
 made at an additional cost of $150 per vehicle. More than
 4 million are on the road right now. The most optimistic

Re: [Biofuel] fuel additives

2004-10-12 Thread Steve Spence

I drive 50 miles to work each way. We are 15 miles from the nearest grocery
store/shopping center, 5 miles from the nearest gas station.

Steve Spence
http://www.green-trust.org
- Original Message - 
From: Johnston, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 6:58 AM
Subject: RE: [Biofuel] fuel additives


Thanks Ramon. British wet and cold weather must be considered as a factor,
as must road salt. The % of hot/cold running should also be considered. Many
car users in this country may use their car for frequent short journeys of
say 5miles or less with the rresult that some cars may seldom be driven, or
attain 'mileage' whilst at designed operating temperature. Avrage annual
miles in the UK is approx 10,000 . What is avge inthe USA?
Don Johnston
Environmental Coordinator , Portsmouth City Council
Chair, Solent Energy and Environment Management Group

Winner ; National Champion-Science and Technology, Green Apple Awards 2002

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 023 9283 4247


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Ramon Mendoza
Sent: 12 October 2004 01:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] fuel additives


I have a 91 Acura Integra, 226k miles, original
muffler and tailpipe.  Replaced the catalytic
converter 2 yrs ago.  But then this is a Southern Cali
car that I've owned since '94- it had about 45,000
when I got her - haven't had to deal with a lot of
ice, sleet, snow and salt on the roads, that's for
sure.

Ramon
--- Legal Eagle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I had a Nissan Sentyra 1987 with over 160,000K on it
 with the original
 muffler. Only part that went south was the locking
 flange at the manifold
 ($26.00).

 Luc
 - Original Message - 
 From: Erik Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 6:34 PM
 Subject: RE: [Biofuel] fuel additives


 
  --- Johnston, Don
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
 
  124k miles on original exhaust seems exceptional
 to
  me,
 
  really?? is this also the experience of other
 people?
  i have quite a few cars here that have 100-200k on
  gasoline engines with the original exhaust and
 it's in
  good condition. and there's one with a rusted out
  muffler that has about 170k on it.
 
  and the diesels range from 150-300k + with no
 problems
  yet. i suspect that diesel fuel doesn't have the
 same
  problems that gas engines experience, but i don't
  really know.
 
  all numbers are in US miles.
 
  erik
 
 
 
 
 



___
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


**
This e-mail is for the intended recipient only.
If an addressing, transmission or other error has
misdirected this e-mail, please notify the author
by replying to this e-mail.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not
use, disclose, distribute, copy, print, or reply to this
email.
This e-mail may be monitored, read, recorded and
retained by Portsmouth City Council.
E-mail monitoring/blocking software may be used.

**

___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] fuel additives

2004-10-12 Thread Steve Spence

Irish Mile =  2048 meters.

mile (mi)
a traditional unit of distance. The word comes from the Latin word for
1000, mille, because originally a mile was the distance a Roman legion
could march in 1000 paces (or 2000 steps, a pace being the distance
between successive falls of the same foot). There is some uncertainty
about the length of the Roman mile. Based on the Roman foot of 29.6
centimeters and assuming a standard pace of 5 Roman feet, the Roman
mile would have been 1480 meters (4856 feet); however, the measured
distance between surviving milestones of Roman roads is often closer
to 1520 meters or 5000 feet. In any case, miles of similar lengths
were used throughout Western Europe. In medieval Britain, several mile
units were used, including a mile of 5000 feet (1524 meters), the
modern mile defined as 8 furlongs (1609 meters), and a longer mile
similar to the French mille (1949 meters), plus the Scottish mile
(1814 meters) and the Irish mile (2048 meters). In 1592 the British
Parliament settled the question by defining the statute mile to be 8
furlongs, 80 chains, 320 rods, 1760 yards or 5280 feet. The statute
mile is exactly 1609.344 meters. In athletics, races of 1500 or 1600
meters are often called metric miles.

http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/61126.html

Steve Spence
http://www.green-trust.org
- Original Message - 
From: Johnston, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 6:29 AM
Subject: RE: [Biofuel] fuel additives


I too checked conversion tables and found it was not listed, so presumed the
same. In any case it still seems that US exhausts last much longer than ULK
counterparts.
Now, just to confuse, what's a Irish mile?

Don Johnston
Environmental Coordinator , Portsmouth City Council
Chair, Solent Energy and Environment Management Group

Winner ; National Champion-Science and Technology, Green Apple Awards 2002

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 023 9283 4247


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 October 2004 00:17
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Biofuel] fuel additives


I don't think there is such a thing as a U.S. mile. Back in the 1950's my
high school teacher told us that the U.S. and Britain had agreed to
compromise on the Canadian definition of the inch as *exactly* 2.540
centimetres. So as far as the mile goes we're all on the same page:
12 inches to the foot, 5280 feet to the mile, and the inches are the same.

I imagine the writer was thinking of U.S. gallons and got confused.

Doug Woodard
St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada


On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Donald Allwright wrote:

 What exactly is a US mile???
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


**
This e-mail is for the intended recipient only.
If an addressing, transmission or other error has
misdirected this e-mail, please notify the author
by replying to this e-mail.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not
use, disclose, distribute, copy, print, or reply to this
email.
This e-mail may be monitored, read, recorded and
retained by Portsmouth City Council.
E-mail monitoring/blocking software may be used.

**

___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] Running on B100

2004-10-12 Thread Steve Spence

The return line should get rid of air in the system for you. air will either
escape in the cylinder, or return to the tank.

Steve Spence
http://www.green-trust.org
- Original Message - 
From: Legal Eagle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 6:26 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Running on B100


 Following another post (no subject) it could be that I have this all wrong
 and that there is air trapped inside the injectors somewhere, although I
 don't think so as I bled out the system with brand new filters, so, by
 default, the problem is at the tank end (maybe?). I shall soon see as I am
 having a Mercedes mechanic give it the twice over to determine EXACTLY
what
 the boo boo is, and I shall be posting the results.
 I share you latitude thing (not quite as north as Edmonton)although no
snow
 quite yet we did hit the freezing mark a couple of times so far and it is
 all down hill from here. **snow is a four letter word**
 Anyway, stay tuned. As far as the changing os the filters goes, the
 information on JtF states that after a couple of tank fulls of B100 to
 expect to have to change them, and that would be about right for me as I
 have run several tank fulls. although having a can type secondary filter
it
 takes longer to fill up than the straight in-line type, so I was under the
 impression that that was the problem so I changed the secondary as the
 primary did not seem clogged (I put air to it in reverse and got nothing
but
 clean fuel). However, I still want to change the lines and flush the tank
 out regardless, as I am sure nothing like this has ever been done in the
 Benz's 21 years of life, so a good enema is overdue.

 Luc
 - Original Message - 
 From: Joey Hundert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 11:33 PM
 Subject: RE: [Biofuel] Running on B100


  Dear Luc,
The posting of your experience is invaluable to me, thank you very
much.
  I'm the proud new owner of a 1984 Merc 300D (5cyl turbo), and she's got
  about 200,000 miles on her (motor rebuilt 20,000 ago!).  Therefore, I
have
  every reason to believe that I'll have the exact same experience that
  you've
  had.  What's more, the logistics are even scarier due to my latitude
  (Edmonton, Alberta, where we saw snow on September 7th).
I have plans to run her on both B100 and SVO, therefore, my second
tank
  is slated for install over the next couple of weeks.  In that the old
fuel
  filters and lines present such a potential crap chute, would it be
  advisable
  to run all veggie fuels (B100 or SVO) through the second, heated tank
with
  new fuel lines until the summer?
 
  Thanks everyone,
 
  Joey Hundert
  Edmonton, AB
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Behalf Of Patrick Campbell
  Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 4:53 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Running on B100
 
 
  Would going to B100 slowly help to avoid this
  problem?  I.e. first running B5, then B10, then B25,
  etc.?  I am granted a good tax deduction here in AZ if
  I run B70 however I need to do an emissions test and
  that has to be done before registration so my time is
  limited.
 
  I can't afford to screw up my vehicle by going
  straight to B70 and having it clog up my fuel
  lines(160K miles on the clock here) and leaving my
  stranded on my way to work.
 
  --- Legal Eagle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Thanks for the input Steve. Would the return line be
  the one right after the
  in-line filter or the second one coming out of the
  fuel filter (to the left)
  away from you as you look at it from the right side
  of the car ?
 
  Luc
  - Original Message -
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 4:50 PM
  Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Running on B100
 
 
   The merc doesn't have a electric pump, but does
  have a external lift pump
   near the fuel filter feeding the injector pump.
  Make sure the return line
   isn't plugged.
  
   = = = Original message = = =
  
   Well, it wasn't the fuel filters :( Apparently the
  BD is such an effective
   cleaner that it loosened up all the residuals in
  the tank and lines and
   they became clogged up.
   The Benz is now at the MB dealer where tomorow it
  will be fitted with new
   fuel lines and the tank emptied and flushed or
  replaced (only if
   necessary).
   The symptoms: the car started to resist it's
  momentum, like it was holding
   back and then releasing it's acceleration and then
  it slowly lost power
   until it came to a slow death on the side of the
  road.
   I changed the filters and started it back up and
  it ran OK for about 60 Km
   or so and then it didn't bother with the resisting
  part and went straight
   to the slow death thing. I could start it but it
  wouldn't get it's RPM up
   and died within moments indicating that there was
  resistance in the fuel
   delivery and the engine didn't like

Re: [Biofuel] Solar Hydrogen

2004-10-12 Thread Steve Spence

Government Hydrogen programs are designed to keep oil companies happy, since
that is the source of all commercial hydrogen. Anything can look economical
if enough tax subsidies are thrown at it. Business as usual.

Steve Spence
http://www.green-trust.org
- Original Message - 
From: Jonathan Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 11:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Solar Hydrogen


 Hey man If you can get it to work Then you will be Okay! I would
not worry about Mr. Bush anyway!

 Jonathan

 MH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Does anyone how this would effect hydrogen
 in Mr. Bush's FreedomCAR program?


  Steve Spence wrote:
  Hydrogen isn't, and won't be anything that will help us save our
Earth.

  That's the whole point these folks are missing. It's not that it can't
be done,
  it's that it shouldn't be done, since they are throwing away a majority
of the
  energy they are producing, and renewables are typically much higher
priced,
  so you want to be as stingy as possible.
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


 -
 Do you Yahoo!?
 vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] Short-range hydrogen

2004-10-12 Thread Steve Spence

Walt isn't being upfront about the system costs of a renewable system that
can generate 30 miles per day of hydrogen. It's more than you will pay in
fuel taxes in your lifetime. EV's, Biodiesel, ethanol, and bio-methane are
much more practical, and also tax free. You won't be able to make hydrogen
at home, and use it in your car, without a monumental upfront system cost.
Much more than you would pay for a VW Diesel, and a lifetime's supply of
biodiesel to run it.


Steve Spence
http://www.green-trust.org
- Original Message - 
From: Jonathan Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 11:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Short-range hydrogen


 YES!!! You said my favorite word in the World! TAX-FREE

 People here in the US need to take note!

 Jonathan

 Walt Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 At 02:25 PM 10/11/04 -0400, you wrote:
 Did you consider how many kWh it would have taken for that 30 miles on
 hydrogen, then compared how many miles that amount of kWh would have
taken
 you on a pure EV? More than 60 miles ..

 But a vehicle with a range of 60 miles is of less utility to me than one
 which can do 30 miles on home-produced, tax-free H2, and then make it home
 on commercial fuel.

 Note that when I say tax-free I'm thinking more about the taxes I have
 to pay on income (fed, state, unemp, socsec, etc.) than just road taxes.
 You're right that there are hidden costs in producing one's one fuel, but
 there are also a lot of hidden cost involved in working for a paycheck and
 then using net income to buy fuel.

 Walt
 http://www.windward.org/

 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


 -
 Do you Yahoo!?
 vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] US to sell 5000 smart bombs to Israel

2004-10-12 Thread Steve Spence

If the UN makes a resolution that is not in the best interests of a
particular country, then ignoring it seems like a very good idea, IF you
have the muscle to repel boarders .

The UN made resolutions that clearly were not in Iraq's best interest, but
they failed to repel boarders. What is in the best interest of one country,
very often is not in the best interest of others. Depends on your POV, and
your appetite. One hopes that a country thinks of others as well as
themselves.

Steve Spence
http://www.green-trust.org
- Original Message - 
From: Ken Riznyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 8:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] US to sell 5000 smart bombs to Israel


 Israel also has ignored many more UN resolutions than
 Iraq ever did. This is true despite the fact that the
 US usually vetos most resolutions concerning Israel.
 Ken
 --- Legal Eagle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  isreal is the ONLY country in the middle east that
  DOES possess WMD's,
  nuclear as well as chem weapons of mass destruction.
  They have reperetedly
  refused the UN inspection passage and thier Dimona
  nuke plank is leaking
  like a sieve.
  Afghanistan and Iraq were bombed and invaded and
  their infrastucture
  destroyed, their children slaughtered, air anw water
  polulted with depleted
  uranium with a shelf life of BILLIONS of yearsw for
  a lot less than what
  Israel has and is doing, but good thing Congress
  keeps taking money from
  AIPAC, the center of the new spy scandal, to ensure
  that the US continues to
  veto any action that might paint Israel is it's true
  light.
 
  Luc
  - Original Message - 
  From: fox mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 4:36 AM
  Subject: [Biofuel] US to sell 5000 smart bombs to
  Israel
 
 
  
   Source: Al Jazeera
  
 
 http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/8C117F99-C20E-4738-A15B-
  
   0BF683A1B21B.htm
  
  
   US to sell Israel 5000 smart bombs
  
   Israel has used US-made bombs to kill several
   Palestinians
  
   The United States will reportedly sell Israel
  nearly
   5000 smart bombs
   in one of the largest weapons deals between the
  allies
   in years.
  
   The deal could face political controversy since
  Israel
   has used such
   bombs against the Palestinians.
  
   In one such instance in July 2002, a one-tonne
  bomb
   meant for a senior
   Palestinian resistance fighter also killed 15
   civilians in an attack in
   the Gaza Strip.
  
   The deal is worth $319 million and was revealed in
  a
   Pentagon report
   made to the US Congress a few weeks ago, Israeli
  daily
   Haaretz said on
   Tuesday.
  
   Funding for the sale will come from US military
  aid to
   Israel.
  
   The bombs include airborne versions, guidance
  units,
   training bombs and
   detonators. These bombs are guided by an existing
   Israeli satellite
   used by the military.
  
   As part of the deal, Israel will receive 500
  one-tonne
   bunker-buster
   bombs that can destroy 2m-thick concrete walls,
  2500
   regular
   one-tonne bombs, 1000 half-tonne bombs and 500
   quarter-tonne bombs, the
   daily said.
  
  
   Bunker bombs
  
   Known by the military designations GBU-27 or
  GBU-28,
   bunker busters
   are guided by lasers or satellites and can
  penetrate
   up to 10 metres of
   earth and concrete.
  
   Israel may already have some of the bombs for its
  F-15
   fighter jets,
   the paper reported.
  
  
  
   As they are part of the weapon set for the F-15,
  I
   would assume them
   to be in place, said Robert Hewson, editor of
  Jane's
   Air-Launched
   Weapons.
  
   Acquiring BLU-109s, which are mounted on
   satellite-guided bombs, would
   boost Israel 's capabilities, foreign experts say.
  
  
   Israel very likely manufactures its own bunker
   busters, but they are
   not as robust as the 2000lb ( 910kg ) BLUs,
  Robert
   Hewson, editor of
   Jane's Air-Launched Weapons, said.
  
  
   He said the bombs proved effective in the 1991
  Gulf
   war and the more
   recent US-led invasion of Iraq .
  
   The US embassy in Israel had no comment, referring
   queries to
   Washington .Israel 's Defence Ministry also
  declined
   to comment.
  
   The Pentagon wants the deal to maintain Israel's
   military advantages
   and ensure US strategic and tactical interests,
   Haaretz said.
  
   Bombs for neighbours?
  
   Haaretz said Israel sought to obtain the US-made,
   one-tonne
   bunker-buster bombs for a possible future strike
   against Iran or
   Syria .
  
  
   A senior Israeli security source confirmed the
  Haaretz
   story saying:
   ... bunker busters could serve Israel against
  Iran ,
   or possibly Syria
   .
  
  
   Our response to any invasive measure will be
   massive, Massoud
   Jazairi, spokesman for Iran 's Revolutionary
  Guard,
   said in Tehran .
  
   Iran , which does not recognise Israel 's right to
   exist, says its
   nuclear

Re: [Biofuel] The VeggieGen is running Veggie!

2004-10-12 Thread Steve Spence

engine coolant will heat DHW though a heat exchanger.

Steve Spence
http://www.green-trust.org
- Original Message - 
From: Ken Riznyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 7:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] The VeggieGen is running Veggie!


 Are you just generating electricity or are you
 co-generating, using the waste heat from your diesel
 engine to heat your house getting more bang for the
 buck and saving even more energy. I don't know why
 more residential or commercial co-generation plants
 aren't used, especially in the northern climes.
 Ken
 --- Steve Spence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  The VeggieGen is running Veggie! Sorta 
  Tonight we fired up on 50/50 Kerosene and Waste
  Vegetable Oil. The
  Detroit Diesel is loving the mix and is purring like
  a kitten!
  Smells sweet. The details of our oil filtration
  system are coming
  shortly. Tomorrow the heat exchanger gets installed
  in the Veggie
  tank for V100 (100% Veggie). We also hope to get the
  muffler installed .
  
  See the full article at
  
 
 http://www.green-trust.org/wiki/index.php?title=Green-Trust_Heat_%
  26_Power_System
  
  http://tinyurl.com/52a4v
  
  
  www.green-trust.org
  
  ___
  Biofuel mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel
  
  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
  
  Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
  http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
  
 
 
 
 
 
 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
 http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] Running on B100

2004-10-12 Thread Steve Spence

stumbling, air blockage, rough running, and stalling.

Steve Spence
http://www.green-trust.org
- Original Message - 
From: Greg Harbican [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 10:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Running on B100


 What would happen if the return line was plugged and fuel could not get
 through ( or very little of it )?
 
 Greg H.
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Steve Spence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 07:38
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Running on B100
 
 
  The return line should get rid of air in the system for you. air will
 either
  escape in the cylinder, or return to the tank.
 
  Steve Spence
  http://www.green-trust.org
 
 
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] Running on B100

2004-10-12 Thread Steve Spence

It's the one coming out of the banjo bolt on top of the filter that heads
back to the fuel tank.

There are two others on top also, coming from the injectors.

Steve Spence
http://www.green-trust.org
- Original Message - 
From: Legal Eagle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Running on B100


 Thanks for the input Steve. Would the return line be the one right after
the
 in-line filter or the second one coming out of the fuel filter (to the
left)
 away from you as you look at it from the right side of the car ?

 Luc
 - Original Message - 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 4:50 PM
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Running on B100


  The merc doesn't have a electric pump, but does have a external lift
pump
  near the fuel filter feeding the injector pump. Make sure the return
line
  isn't plugged.
 
  = = = Original message = = =
 
  Well, it wasn't the fuel filters :( Apparently the BD is such an
effective
  cleaner that it loosened up all the residuals in the tank and lines and
  they became clogged up.
  The Benz is now at the MB dealer where tomorow it will be fitted with
new
  fuel lines and the tank emptied and flushed or replaced (only if
  necessary).
  The symptoms: the car started to resist it's momentum, like it was
holding
  back and then releasing it's acceleration and then it slowly lost power
  until it came to a slow death on the side of the road.
  I changed the filters and started it back up and it ran OK for about 60
Km
  or so and then it didn't bother with the resisting part and went
straight
  to the slow death thing. I could start it but it wouldn't get it's RPM
up
  and died within moments indicating that there was resistance in the fuel
  delivery and the engine didn't like it and died. All air had been bled
out
  of the system at both the primary and secondary filter inlets, so the
  problem, by default, is at the other end.
  Anybody know for sure if a 1983 240D has a filter in the fuel tank or if
  it has an electric motor pumping the fuel?
 
  Thanks, any input, as usual, is appreciated.
 
  Luc
  ___
  Biofuel mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel
 
  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
  Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
  http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 
 
  ___
  Sent by ePrompter, the premier email notification software.
  Free download at http://www.ePrompter.com.
 
  ___
  Biofuel mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel
 
  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
  Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
  http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] Short-range hydrogen

2004-10-12 Thread Steve Spence

Walt, If I charge an EV from my solar panels, I can go twice as far than If
I used that electric to electrolyze hydrogen, compress it, and burn it in
a fuel cell. Not to mention the costs involved with the electrolyzer, the
compressor, and the fuel cell far outweigh the cost  of an EV. Now why would
I be so foolish to throw away my expensive and high quality PV electric in
such a manner?


Steve Spence
http://www.green-trust.org
- Original Message - 
From: Walt Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Short-range hydrogen


 At 09:56 AM 10/12/04 -0400, Steve wrote:
  Walt isn't being upfront about the system costs of a renewable system
that
  can generate 30 miles per day of hydrogen. It's more than you will pay
in
  fuel taxes in your lifetime.

 You're probably right, but so what?

 Everyone's situation is different, and therefore their options will differ
 as well. Our situation is such that we're not constrained by the economics
 that rule corporate research.

 Corporations have to pay rent for the land they use; we've got our 130
 acre  campus, and the building's we've built there, and eleven septic
 systems, and more than a mile of underground water lines, and so on all
 owned outright, so we don't have to figure those costs in our systems.

 And we don't have shareholders who expect a monetary return on that
 investment. What they do expect is that we'll use these resources to
 explore ways that sustainable energy can be made relevant to
 community-based systems.

 Corporations have to pay hefty salaries to get engineers to design and
 build their systems; we're a team of retired/laid-off engineers who live
 here and do these things because they're fun and need doing, so we don't
 have to figure those personnel costs in either.

 Corporations have to hire welders, machinists and electricians to set up
 their systems; we have our own machine shop with six different types of
 welders, an induction foundry that can handle 200 pound castings, our own
 saw mill (and our own trees for that matter), and on and on . . .

 Are we a bunch of amateur tinkers? You bet, we are. We do this because we
 love the concepts, are fascinated by the technology and committed to
 finding ways to weave a renewable matrix that will provide a quality life.

 It's sort of like the need to distinguish between what one's going to have
 for dinner, and how one is going to manage their diet. You can get a
 McDonald's double-cheese burger for a buck a piece every day of the week,
 so why endure all the upfront cost involved in building a kitchen and
 learning to cook?

 Walt
 http://www.windward.org/

 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] Miles driven ( was fuel additives )

2004-10-12 Thread Steve Spence

My circulating tank heaters pull 1kw (there are 500 and 800 watt models). My
fuel filter pad heaters pull 68 watts.

Steve Spence
http://www.green-trust.org
- Original Message - 
From: Mel Riser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 12:05 PM
Subject: RE: [Biofuel] Miles driven ( was fuel additives )


It has been getting cooler here and we have some nights down in the 60's

I have noticed the 6.2 Blazer getting a good bit harder to start, and I am
having to hold the glow plug relay in about a full minute. All summer it
only took about 15 to 30 seconds. This morning I had to do it twice.

It looks like I may start plugging it in soon to keep it warm. Anybody have
an idea of how many watts these block heaters pull?

Wondering if it might be better to put it on a timer that goes off right
before daylight?

Then it warms in an hour or two.?

mel

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.773 / Virus Database: 520 - Release Date: 10/5/2004

___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] The VeggieGen is running Veggie!

2004-10-12 Thread Steve Spence

Yes, that's me.

Steve Spence
http://www.green-trust.org
- Original Message - 
From: Johnston, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 11:30 AM
Subject: RE: [Biofuel] The VeggieGen is running Veggie!


Congratulations! was that you in the picture sitting on the engine?

Don Johnston
Environmental Coordinator , Portsmouth City Council
Chair, Solent Energy and Environment Management Group

Winner ; National Champion-Science and Technology, Green Apple Awards 2002

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 023 9283 4247


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Steve Spence
Sent: 12 October 2004 15:31
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] The VeggieGen is running Veggie!


engine coolant will heat DHW though a heat exchanger.

Steve Spence
http://www.green-trust.org
- Original Message - 
From: Ken Riznyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 7:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] The VeggieGen is running Veggie!


 Are you just generating electricity or are you
 co-generating, using the waste heat from your diesel
 engine to heat your house getting more bang for the
 buck and saving even more energy. I don't know why
 more residential or commercial co-generation plants
 aren't used, especially in the northern climes.
 Ken
 --- Steve Spence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

  The VeggieGen is running Veggie! Sorta 
  Tonight we fired up on 50/50 Kerosene and Waste
  Vegetable Oil. The
  Detroit Diesel is loving the mix and is purring like
  a kitten!
  Smells sweet. The details of our oil filtration
  system are coming
  shortly. Tomorrow the heat exchanger gets installed
  in the Veggie
  tank for V100 (100% Veggie). We also hope to get the
  muffler installed .
 
  See the full article at
 
 
 http://www.green-trust.org/wiki/index.php?title=Green-Trust_Heat_%
  26_Power_System
 
  http://tinyurl.com/52a4v
 
 
  www.green-trust.org
 
  ___
  Biofuel mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel
 
  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
  Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
  http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 





 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
 http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


**
This e-mail is for the intended recipient only.
If an addressing, transmission or other error has
misdirected this e-mail, please notify the author
by replying to this e-mail.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not
use, disclose, distribute, copy, print, or reply to this
email.
This e-mail may be monitored, read, recorded and
retained by Portsmouth City Council.
E-mail monitoring/blocking software may be used.

**

___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] B100 Cleaning action

2004-10-12 Thread Steve Spence

We often get filter clogs the first time bio-d is used, which is why we
install a sacrificial filter for the first few tank fills.

Steve Spence
http://www.green-trust.org
- Original Message - 
From: Legal Eagle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 8:26 PM
Subject: [Biofuel] B100 Cleaning action


Does anyone have any clear information on fuel tanks being affected in the
use of B100, as in any documented experiences where the BD has dislodged
residues which has resulted in a clogging of tank or fuel filters ?

Thanks.

Luc
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] OK for biodiesel?

2004-10-11 Thread Steve Spence

Just about anything in the usa is legal, except distilling drinkable
spirits. That you need a permit for. homemade fuels for personal use have
very few restrictions.


Steve Spence
http://www.green-trust.org
- Original Message - 
From: francisco j burgos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2004 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] OK for biodiesel?


 Dear pals:
 some one wrote that he added white spirit to the Biodiesel in order to
 keep clean the fuel system... since white spirit is made of light
aromatics
 (CAS N¼ 647 42-95-6) I wonder if it is legal in USA such Biodiesel/white
 spirit blend. It is very important to clarify this matter.
 Thaks, F.

 - Original Message - 
 From: Peggy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Anamaria [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Antonio Moroc
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Diaz [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Javier
Pinto
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mar’a Gabriela Guerrero
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
  Oslo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Cc: Anita [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Barboza [EMAIL PROTECTED];
  Duilia Tovar [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jorge
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
  Pilar Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2004 11:53 AM
 Subject: [Biofuel] OK for biodiesel?


  Also has anyone created a file of biofuels rules and regulations?  We
  all need help.  I appreciate those who offered help in understanding
  their US state's concerns.  We should also include other parts of the
  world.
 
  Peggy
 
  Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Massey Ferguson tractors- OK for biodiesel?
 
  Dear pals:
  is there any one who knows the international customs code number that
  covers
  Biodiesel as a matter of import-export?.
  Are there special regulations for transportation BD by air, road or
  seaship?
  Just in case I require to get some samples BD-100, BD-20 from overseas
  to
  compare with mine.
  Tks. F.
 
  - Original Message - 
  From: Saul Juliao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 9:45 PM
  Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Massey Ferguson tractors- OK for biodiesel?
 
 
  Hi Ron,
 
  I live in Canada... I don't know if MF ok's it but I use Bio-diesel in
  my
  old
  MF165 which has a Perkins 4 cylinder engine in it.  I have had no
  problems
  with it since I started making Bio-diesel going back to April.
 
  Saul A. Juliao
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Folks,
 
  I was looking at the Massey Ferguson web site and was wondering if
  anyone
  has run across the company saying it is alright for burning biodiesel
  in
  their equipment?
 
  Though MF is part of a larger company based in the US, I
  believe...the
  tractors are manufactured in Canada, correct? Would anyone living in
  Canada (the USA's best friend, I might add) know if MF tractors can
  burn
  biodiesl (OK'd by the manufacturer)?
 
  Thanks,
  Ron B.
 
  ___
  Biofuel mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel
 
  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
  Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
  http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 

 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: Was Re: [Biofuel] Changing Government/Now ethanol

2004-10-10 Thread Steve Spence

in a word, NO.

Say goodbye to your injectors and pump.

Steve Spence
http://www.green-trust.org
- Original Message - 
From: Ken Riznyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2004 12:26 AM
Subject: Re: Was Re: [Biofuel] Changing Government/Now ethanol


 Any diesel engine will run on kerosene. Now that
 diesel is $2.15 per gallon in the US I'm running
 kerosene in my Jetta diesel. $1.59 per gallon. It's
 illegal but I don't really care about that.
 
 --- Gasman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Hello Phil,
  
  - Original Message -
  From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2004 10:09 PM
  Subject: RE: Was Re: [Biofuel] Changing
  Government/Now ethanol
  
  
   Hello Phil
  
   Hello all!
   
   Is there anyone out there who has tried running a
  petrol motor on
   paraffin?  I know the timing needs retarding and
  that performance is
   terrible, but here in Africa, the fuel is very,
  very cheap.
  
   I'm told it's done in Sri Lanka, probably in other
  countries. Maybe
   they start up on petrol (gasoline) (in America
  they haven't spoken
   it for years), but anyway they run a paraffin
  (kerosene) fuel line
   round the exhaust manifold to heat it up first. I
  think that means
   hot, not just warm. I guess they know just how
  to do it, and how
   not to do it too - probably not something to chuck
  guesses at.
  
  We used to have many such engines in India called
  kero engines which were
  fitted to motorbikes, mainly because of subsidised
  kerosene. One peculiarity
  I noticed was that the engine continued to fire
  slowly and intermitently
  long after the ignition was switched off.
  
   No, you certainly didn't ever hear such a thing
  from me, definitely not,
  no.
  
   What are the environmental implications of
  burning the stuff and
   implications for engine life?
  
   Dire, probably, on both counts.
  
   Best wishes
  
   Keith
  
  
   Phil Rendel
   English Department
   Kingswood College,
   Burton Street,
   Grahamstown
   tel. 046 603 6600
   fax. 046 622 3084
   cell: 084 448 1052
  
   snip
  Regards
  balaji
  
  
  
  Hello Phil!  
  
  If you wish, and Keith allows us to talk in depth
  about how to arrange 
  a petrol (gasoline) motor to work smoothly on motor
  paraffin (kerosene),
  I can offer you my experience of 13 years and over
  100.000 km with two
  of my cars. Both driven by motorpetroleum and
  waterinjection (actually
  suctioned by the motor itself, the same way as the
  fuel). 
  
  
  Max Gasman
  
  ___
  Biofuel mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel
  
  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
  
  Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
  http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
  
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
 http://vote.yahoo.com
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] Back to grid via WVO genset

2004-10-10 Thread Steve Spence

from svo, or wvo?

Steve Spence
http://www.green-trust.org
- Original Message - 
From: Lyle Estill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 9:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Back to grid via WVO genset


 Ok.  Let's leave the same proposition out there.  Creating electricity 
 from svo is a monumental waste of energy.
 
 
 On Oct 8, 2004, at 2:54 PM, Robert Del Bueno wrote:
 
  I never intended the use of biodiesel.
  The idea is for reclaimed waste vegetable oils.
 
  I am curious on if anyone has given thought to the emissions per kWh 
  of such a setup versus coal fired plant (...who in our area are 
  successful in avoiding EPA New Source Review regulations, and continue 
  to spew).
 
  Also considering the addition of a pre-combustion fuel catalyst, and 
  additional after treament (because of dedicated veg use).
 
 
  At 01:28 PM 10/8/2004, you wrote:
  Lyle,
 
   Is it not true that the grid is so much more efficient than Rob's
   generator that making electricity from biodiesel is a waste of
   perfectly good fuel?
 
  I don't know about that. Do you think that an approximate 65% loss in 
  energy
  from fuel source to your duplex outlet is very efficient?
 
  That's the loss achieved by the grid that provides electrical service 
  to
  you.
 
  You may be right about a fairly needless waste of biodiesel, however.
  Especially when gensets operate under constant load and for the most 
  part
  are capable of running on WVO/SVO. The inclusion of more energy 
  inputs by
  making biodiesel might be unnecessary in many instances.
 
  Todd Swearingen
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Lyle Estill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 9:34 PM
  Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Back to grid via WVO genset
 
 
   Gang,
  
   I've enjoyed this thread for awhile now, and have finally found the
   courage to post.
  
   Is it not true that the grid is so much more efficient than Rob's
   generator that making electricity from biodiesel is a waste of
   perfectly good fuel?
  
From a conservation standpoint (strictly BTUs--forget geopolitical
   arguments for a moment), he is better off running his studio on 
  grid.
  
  
   On Oct 7, 2004, at 11:23 PM, Appal Energy wrote:
  
Kirk,
   
Did that fellow say that every China diesel owner achieved in 
  excess
of
10,000 hours? Or was he only pointing to the exceptions? It would
also be a
rather rare truck that got one million miles before it had to 
  have the
top
end and rings done. 300-500,000 is a more real breaking point 
  there.
You're
also speaking of relatively small horsepower and not a great deal 
  of
engine
mass. Don't think you can compare the odd duck of a truck to the 
  whole
roost.
   
Todd Swearingen
   
- Original Message -
From: Kirk McLoren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Back to grid via WVO genset
   
   
That fellow Skip who wrote More Power to You said he knew 
  China
diesel
owners that had in excess of 10,000 hours without a rebuild. We 
  know
trucks
go 100 miles and at an avg of 50mph that is 20.000 hours
   
Kirk
   
Appal Energy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert,
   
What is the flaw I am missing?
   
You don't use all 2,000 kWh in 2-3 hour blocks. To make your 
  idea work
without a storage system you would have to conduct all your 
  energy
consuming
activities within that narrow time window. You'd probably be best
served
by
installing a battery bank and converter and cycle your gennie as
required.
   
You've also got to depreciate your gennie. Check the 
  manufacturer's
estimated life cycle. Usually they're only 2-3 thousand hours 
  before a
rebuild is necessary, meaning that you'll be buying a new gennie 
  or
paying
the rebuild costs every second or third year.
   
Todd Swearingen
   
- Original Message -
From: Robert Del Bueno
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 10:11 PM
Subject: [Biofuel] Back to grid via WVO genset
   
   
So looking at my power bill for my recording studio business, 
  we use
on
average about 2000kWH per month.
If I were to run a 30kW diesel genset on SVO for 2.5 hours a 
  day, 30
days
a
month...
   
75Hx30kW=2250kWH ...
   
I know that net-metering in Georgia does not pay retail rates 
  for
intertie
power, but hell, even if I had to run for 3-4 hours a day, seems
like I
could do well.
Of course using a water cooled genset, I would also use the hot 
  water
for
heating applications.
I have a steady supply of good SVO.
And 30kw diesel genset available very affordable.
I know the intertie/net metering equipment costs a fair amount, 
  but
will
be
applicable for future

Re: [Biofuel] HELP

2004-10-10 Thread Steve Spence

yep, that was my exceptions remark.

Steve Spence
http://www.green-trust.org
- Original Message - 
From: Gregg Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 5:39 PM
Subject: RE: [Biofuel] HELP


 Hi Steve,

 While you can't use 100% Biodiesel in a gasoline engine, you can mix it up
to a maximum of 15% with the gas. It works great in lawn mower / lawn
tractor engines as well. Same maximum percentage.

 Sincerely
 Gregg Davidson

 Steve Spence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The KB (solvent strength) of biodiesel is similar to #2 diesel.

 Biodiesel smells like French fries, sorta.

 No, you can't use Biodiesel in a petrol car (stock answer, exceptions
 rule).

 Steve Spence
 www.green-trust.org


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of chih chou
 Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 11:58 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Biofuel] HELP

 DEAR SIR
 HERE I AM ASKING FOR HELP.
 1, WHAT IS THE KB VALUE OF BIO-DIESEL?
 2, WHAT IS BIO-DIESEL SMELL LIKE?
 3,IF WE MIXED THE BIO-DIESEL WITH UNLEAD PETRO CAN THIS MIXTURE BE USING
 IN ORDINARY PERTOL ENGINE CAR?
 THANKS FOR ANYONE CAN ANSWER MY QUESTION
 BEST REGARDS
 GORVANS
 -- 
 ___
 Find what you are looking for with the Lycos Yellow Pages
 http://r.lycos.com/r/yp_emailfooter/http://yellowpages.lycos.com/default
 .asp?SRC=lycos10

 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


 -
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: Was Re: [Biofuel] Changing Government/Now ethanol

2004-10-10 Thread Steve Spence

don't get caught with red diesel in your tank. passenger vehicles don't
usually get checked, though my buddy, Eddie, did with his diesel suburban.


Steve Spence
http://www.green-trust.org
- Original Message - 
From: Greg Harbican [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2004 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: Was Re: [Biofuel] Changing Government/Now ethanol


 Nothing says you couldn't do such, one thing to remember that the main
 difference is the additives, and that the slower running the Diesel engine
 is, the heavier the hydrocarbons ( and lower the cetane value of fuel )
that
 can be used, without to much problems.In theory, you could design a
 engine that ran on heavy crude oil, but, it would need to be a slow
running
 engine.

 Diesel engines that run at higher RPMs, and Diesel engines that do a lot
of
 speed changes ( low RPM / high RPM / low RPM / and high again, such as you
 find with around town driving ) needs a lighter hydrocarbon, and a higher
 cetane value for better performance.In theory a cetane value of about
 45-50 is best for in city driving, although 40 would be fine for long
 distance hwy driving, 35 should be fine for a farm tractor and oil furnace
 use.

 Greg H.

 - Original Message - 
 From: Kirk McLoren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2004 15:52
 Subject: Re: Was Re: [Biofuel] Changing Government/Now ethanol


  When I lived in Montana the local fuel supplier filled your winter
tractor
 fuel tank and the oil stove tank from the same tank truck load. It was
dyed
 red to stop its use on the highway.
 
  Kirk
 


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] Back to grid via WVO genset

2004-10-08 Thread Steve Spence

My Detroit Diesel is rated for 40k hours between rebuilds.

Steve Spence
http://www.green-trust.org
- Original Message - 
From: Kirk McLoren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 9:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Back to grid via WVO genset


 That fellow Skip who wrote More Power to You said he knew China diesel
owners that had in excess of 10,000 hours without a rebuild. We know trucks
go 100 miles and at an avg of 50mph that is 20.000 hours

 Kirk

 Appal Energy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Robert,

  What is the flaw I am missing?

 You don't use all 2,000 kWh in 2-3 hour blocks. To make your idea work
 without a storage system you would have to conduct all your energy
consuming
 activities within that narrow time window. You'd probably be best served
by
 installing a battery bank and converter and cycle your gennie as required.

 You've also got to depreciate your gennie. Check the manufacturer's
 estimated life cycle. Usually they're only 2-3 thousand hours before a
 rebuild is necessary, meaning that you'll be buying a new gennie or paying
 the rebuild costs every second or third year.

 Todd Swearingen

 - Original Message - 
 From: Robert Del Bueno
 To:
 Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 10:11 PM
 Subject: [Biofuel] Back to grid via WVO genset


  So looking at my power bill for my recording studio business, we use on
  average about 2000kWH per month.
  If I were to run a 30kW diesel genset on SVO for 2.5 hours a day, 30
days
 a
  month...
 
  75Hx30kW=2250kWH ...
 
  I know that net-metering in Georgia does not pay retail rates for
intertie
  power, but hell, even if I had to run for 3-4 hours a day, seems like I
  could do well.
  Of course using a water cooled genset, I would also use the hot water
for
  heating applications.
  I have a steady supply of good SVO.
  And 30kw diesel genset available very affordable.
  I know the intertie/net metering equipment costs a fair amount, but will
 be
  applicable for future solar pv use as well.
 
  What is the flaw I am missing?
  -Rob
 
  ___
  Biofuel mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel
 
  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
  Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
  http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 

 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


 -
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



RE: [Biofuel] Back to grid via WVO genset

2004-10-08 Thread Steve Spence

I suspect that expecting a fuel additive to double the life of an engine
is not such a good idea.

Steve Spence
IT Specialist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(315) 393-3573 x.242


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Johnston, Don
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 6:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Biofuel] Back to grid via WVO genset

I suspect and believe that one could double that to 40,000 hours with
kd420, 0R ep4 combustion enhancing technology.

Don Johnston
Environmental Coordinator , Portsmouth City Council
Chair, Solent Energy and Environment Management Group

Winner ; National Champion-Science and Technology, Green Apple Awards
2002

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Tel: 023 9283 4247


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Kirk McLoren
Sent: 08 October 2004 02:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Back to grid via WVO genset


That fellow Skip who wrote More Power to You said he knew China
diesel owners that had in excess of 10,000 hours without a rebuild. We
know trucks go 100 miles and at an avg of 50mph that is 20.000 hours
 
Kirk

Appal Energy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert,

 What is the flaw I am missing?

You don't use all 2,000 kWh in 2-3 hour blocks. To make your idea work
without a storage system you would have to conduct all your energy
consuming
activities within that narrow time window. You'd probably be best served
by
installing a battery bank and converter and cycle your gennie as
required.

You've also got to depreciate your gennie. Check the manufacturer's
estimated life cycle. Usually they're only 2-3 thousand hours before a
rebuild is necessary, meaning that you'll be buying a new gennie or
paying
the rebuild costs every second or third year.

Todd Swearingen

- Original Message - 
From: Robert Del Bueno 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 10:11 PM
Subject: [Biofuel] Back to grid via WVO genset


 So looking at my power bill for my recording studio business, we use
on
 average about 2000kWH per month.
 If I were to run a 30kW diesel genset on SVO for 2.5 hours a day, 30
days
a
 month...

 75Hx30kW=2250kWH ...

 I know that net-metering in Georgia does not pay retail rates for
intertie
 power, but hell, even if I had to run for 3-4 hours a day, seems like
I
 could do well.
 Of course using a water cooled genset, I would also use the hot water
for
 heating applications.
 I have a steady supply of good SVO.
 And 30kw diesel genset available very affordable.
 I know the intertie/net metering equipment costs a fair amount, but
will
be
 applicable for future solar pv use as well.

 What is the flaw I am missing?
 -Rob

 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


**
This e-mail is for the intended recipient only.
If an addressing, transmission or other error has 
misdirected this e-mail, please notify the author
by replying to this e-mail.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not
use, disclose, distribute, copy, print, or reply to this
email.
This e-mail may be monitored, read, recorded and
retained by Portsmouth City Council.
E-mail monitoring/blocking software may be used.

**

___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



RE: [Biofuel] HELP

2004-10-08 Thread Steve Spence


The KB (solvent strength) of biodiesel is similar to #2 diesel.

Biodiesel smells like French fries, sorta.

No, you can't use Biodiesel in a petrol car (stock answer, exceptions
rule).

Steve Spence
www.green-trust.org


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of chih chou
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 11:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Biofuel] HELP

DEAR SIR
HERE I AM ASKING FOR HELP.
1, WHAT IS THE KB VALUE OF BIO-DIESEL?
2, WHAT IS BIO-DIESEL SMELL LIKE?
3,IF WE MIXED THE BIO-DIESEL WITH UNLEAD PETRO CAN THIS MIXTURE BE USING
IN ORDINARY PERTOL ENGINE CAR?
THANKS FOR ANYONE CAN ANSWER MY QUESTION
BEST REGARDS
GORVANS
-- 
___
Find what you are looking for with the Lycos Yellow Pages
http://r.lycos.com/r/yp_emailfooter/http://yellowpages.lycos.com/default
.asp?SRC=lycos10

___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] Fwd: Kyoto clears last hurdle / Scientists againstBush/U.S. can end oil use

2004-10-03 Thread Steve Spence

carbon tax does not equal pollution credits.


Steve Spence
http://www.green-trust.org
- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2004 10:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Fwd: Kyoto clears last hurdle / Scientists
againstBush/U.S. can end oil use


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi All,

 does the Carbon tax not level out playing field for renewable energy
sources as will push forwards development and grants for projects.

 Here in Ireland we currently have to pay VAT @21% on all our plant
(biomass and pellet heating systems) which makes the fossil alternative look
cheap by comparison.

 When we introduce carbon tax on use fossil we will make this technology
more attractive to all users and hence open both carbon sequestion to being
viable and economical way to generate income as well as diverting capital
away from fossil towards renewables.

 In EU fines still going ahead if Kyoto targets not reached,
 e.g. Ireland now 30% over target and facing Euro10bn fine.

 dD


 _
 Sign up for eircom broadband now and get a free two month trial.*
 Phone 1850 73 00 73 or visit http://home.eircom.net/broadbandoffer


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] Dodge Cummins Fuel Hoses

2004-10-03 Thread Steve Spence

It's a '96, you don't need to change anything.

Steve Spence
http://www.green-trust.org
- Original Message - 
From: Cullen Newsom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2004 6:36 PM
Subject: [Biofuel] Dodge Cummins Fuel Hoses


 Hello Everyone,
 
 Forgive me (or don't) for not searching the archive first. 
 Does anyone know about the hose(s) I need to change, or be ready
 to change before running SVO or Biodiesel?  Mine is a 1996 D3500
 Cummins.  I've recently gathered nearly all the stuff I need,
 except changing the fuel hoses and stuff.  Anyone have any
 experience to share?  Thanks.
 
 Cullen
 
 
 
 
 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
 http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] Fwd: Kyoto clears last hurdle / Scientists against Bush/ U.S. can end oil use

2004-10-02 Thread Steve Spence

Carbon trading of course is just a scam to allow you to buy polluting rights
from others while pretending everyone has a right to pollute just a little.

Carbon trading is not a good thing!


- Original Message - 
From: MH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2004 8:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Fwd: Kyoto clears last hurdle / Scientists against
Bush/ U.S. can end oil use


Russia to ratify Kyoto treaty

 Putin joins fight against climate change, leaving Bush
 isolated and US cut out of carbon trading market

 Paul Brown, environment correspondent
 Oct 1, 2004
 The Guardian
 http://www.guardian.co.uk/russia/article/0,2763,1317289,00.html

 Politicians, industry leaders and environment groups across the
 world welcomed the news last night that Russia had rejuvenated
 international efforts to combat climate change by ratifying the
 Kyoto protocol.

 President Vladimir Putin's decision isolates the US, and brings
 Russia closer economic and political ties with the European Union.

 The treaty, which commits 30 industrialised countries into legally
 binding greenhouse gas reduction targets, will kick-start a
 multibillion- pound carbon trading market, the transfer of clean
 technologies to developing countries and promote joint ventures
 with countries in the former Soviet bloc. It is also a blow to
 President George Bush who repudiated the treaty on taking office
 and has repeatedly tried to persuade Mr Putin to do the same.

 Russia's move means that US business will be cut out of the new
 carbon trading markets which have already been set up in London.
 Countries and companies in the scheme have targets to cut their
 carbon dioxide emissions. If they exceed their targets they will be
 able to sell the extra carbon saved to other countries or companies
 which have failed to do so. The market is expected to be worth tens
 of billions of pounds a year.

 Carbon trading and incentives to install renewables and other clean
 technologies in the treaty gives European companies a financial
 advantage in joint trading agreements with former Eastern bloc and
 developing countries.

 Because of the collapse of Russia's economy in the early 1990s,
 London traders estimated yesterday that Mr Putin's government has
 $10bn (about £5.5bn) of carbon credits to sell on the international
 markets to countries which cannot meet their own targets.

 A flurry of international excitement about Kyoto began yesterday after
 the Russian cabinet announced that it had prepared the papers to
 ratify the treaty and was forwarding them to the Russian parliament,
 or Duma, for ratification. Since Mr Putin's United Russia party
 controls two-thirds of the Duma, and he directed the cabinet to act,
 ratification is seen as a virtual certainty.

 The Kyoto protocol, negotiated in 1997, ties those countries of the
 industrialised world which have signed up to it into carbon dioxide
 reductions of around 5% on 1990 levels.

 Scientists say that cuts of 60% are needed across the world to avoid
 runaway climate change, mass extinctions and catastrophic sea
 level rise.

 However, the treaty was only seen as a first step, and when the first
 cuts are implemented by 2010 the process is expected to continue,
 setting tougher targets for 2020.

 Making a major speech on climate change two weeks ago, Tony
 Blair emphasised the need to begin thinking beyond 2010 to bring
 China and India into the process of reducing greenhouse gases. He
 has already said he will make climate change his priority for his
 presidency of the G8 next year.

 The executive secretary of the UN Climate Change Convention, Joke
 Waller-Hunter, said: President Putin has given an inspiring signal
 to the international community. By giving industry, local authorities
 and consumers incentives to take action on climate change, Russia
 and the 29 other industrialised countries that have joined the
 protocol will set themselves on a path to greater economic
 efficiency.

 Margaret Beckett, the environment secretary, described it as a
 crucial step forward. As far as the US was concerned it opened up
 a different vista. The US has long since assumed that Kyoto was
 dead but it is not. There will be voices in US industry saying 'we are
 missing out here'. It is early to say where this will lead but this will
 make a considerable difference.

 The protocol is a legally binding addition to the 1992 climate change
 convention. The EU as a whole is committed to an 8% reduction on
 greenhouse gas emissions on 1990 levels by 2010 and is
 struggling to reach the target. Some countries will have to buy in
 carbon from countries such as Russia which have credits to spare.

 The UK, which has a 12.5% reduction target, is on course to exceed
 this by about 3% but is unlikely to sell any spare carbon, saving up
 any extra credits for the next negotiating period to 2020.


 EMS UPDATE - Sept 30, 2004


 KYOTO CLEARS LAST HURDLE

 The Russian cabinet approved 

Re: [Biofuel] Fwd: Kyoto clears last hurdle / Scientists againstBush/U.S. can end oil use

2004-10-02 Thread Steve Spence

Increased use of renewable energy and advancing efficient  use of
renewable fuels is a good thing.

advancing efficient  use of  fossil fuels is only temporary step to
eliminating them.

trading pollution credits does not make the above happen. If I'm doing the
right thing, why should I trade those credits to allow someone else to do
the wrong thing. That cancels out the good I've done. I'll tell you what,
I'll vote for Kerry, so that you can vote for bush .




- Original Message - 
From: MH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2004 10:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Fwd: Kyoto clears last hurdle / Scientists
againstBush/U.S. can end oil use


  Steve Spence wrote:
  Carbon trading of course is just a scam to allow you to buy polluting
rights
  from others while pretending everyone has a right to pollute just a
little.
 
  Carbon trading is not a good thing!


  Increased use of renewable energy and advancing efficient
  use of renewable and fossil fuels is not a good trade off
  regarding climate change?


   Russia to ratify Kyoto treaty
 
   Putin joins fight against climate change, leaving Bush
   isolated and US cut out of carbon trading market
 
   Paul Brown, environment correspondent
   Oct 1, 2004
   The Guardian
   http://www.guardian.co.uk/russia/article/0,2763,1317289,00.html
  SNIP
  - Original Message -
 
  EMS UPDATE - Sept 30, 2004
 
 
  KYOTO CLEARS LAST HURDLE
 
  The Russian cabinet approved the ratification of the Kyoto global
warming
  treaty today.  Russia's ratification means the Kyoto Protocol will enter
  into force as an internationally binding treaty in 2005.
 
  The treaty must still win the approval of Russia's lower parliament
house,
  but that is considered a virtual certainty.
 
  News stories  press releases:  http://www.ems.org
 
 
  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
 
  SCIENTISTS BEGIN TOUR TO OPPOSE BUSH
 
  Scientists and Engineers for Change, a group that includes 10 Nobel
  laureates, has begun a tour to battleground states to highlight the
misuse
  of science by the Bush administration.
 
  I am not a Democrat and I have never played a significant role in
  politics, said Dr. Douglas Osheroff, a Nobel-winning professor of
physics
  at Stanford who is a part of the group. We must begin to address
climate
  change now. To do so, we must have an administration that listens to the
  scientific community, not one that manipulates and minimizes scientific
  input.
 
  Tour stops are scheduled for Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New
  Mexico, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Oregon, Virginia and Wisconsin.
 
  Press release, news:  http://www.ems.org
 
 
  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
 
  STUDY: U.S. CAN END OIL USE
 
  A Pentagon-cofunded blueprint for making the United States oil-free,
  released September 20 by the Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI), finds that
by
  2015 the United States can save more oil than it gets from the Persian
  Gulf -- and can eliminate its oil use altogether by 2050. The plan
achieves
  a net cost savings for the United States and does not require taxation
or
  regulation.
 
  The plan, Winning the Oil Endgame: Innovation for Profits, Jobs, and
  Security, would eliminate half of U.S. oil use through improved
efficiency,
  and the other half through the use of biofuels and natural gas.
 
  Because saving and substituting oil costs less than buying it, our
study
  finds a net savings of $70 billion a year, said RMI CEO Amory Lovins.
 
  More:  http://www.ems.org
 
 
 
  ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
  EMS listservs provide news tips and resources for journalists.
  You received this email because you signed up at our website,
  http://ems.org.  Please forward this email to your colleagues.
 
  To subscribe or change your preferences:
  Please visit http://www.ems.org/updates.html
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] Israel's Terrorists

2004-10-02 Thread Steve Spence

Most all of us would sic like to have a section on the ballot that
says Neither candidate is suitable.  Please try again.

I like that. Thank you!

- Original Message - 
From: Peggy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2004 11:50 AM
Subject: RE: [Biofuel] Israel's Terrorists


 Hello Enthusiasts,
 
 There are sections of this recent post from Robert that are so powerful
 that they need to be repeated.  I read it several times and excuse me
 for highlighting what I consider as important elements, but here goes...
 
 Alfred E. Newman debates Farmer John.  I changed some of the wording
 to suit my frame of mind and added a few paragraphs.  Sometimes three
 people in a post are confusing.  Too bad we can't use different colors
 to understand who is talking.
 
 And it is true that... Many Americans believe that we act with the
 world's best interest in mind.  It all started in school and church.
 Our beliefs can't change without replacing them with a new belief.
 Therefore, when we rip out a deeply imbedded belief, we need a new one
 to pop into its place.  This is basic to human nature
 
 Those of us who live most anywhere else sic have very little say in
 national politics, as the candidates are essentially chosen for us by
 the political system on the east coast.  I watched the debate in stunned
 amazement that Mickey Mouse and Dopey are both vying for the
 opportunity to sic feed their egos as king of the country for a short
 while.  Nuclear or not...there are so many different issues that are too
 federally controlled.
 
 Most all of us would sic like to have a section on the ballot that
 says Neither candidate is suitable.  Please try again.
 
  But let's back on biofuel subject : at last Kyoto protocol has been 
  ratified and the US industry will be obliged to make efforts to
 compete 
  with more virtuous companies especially in Europe. It should be good
 for 
  the planet...and the americans who are living on. Despite their
 government.
 
 This next statement does not make sense... especially when applied to
 rural economic development.  Returning the power back to the farmers for
 self-sufficiency and producing an excess to sell to others is agreeable.
 I will meet with both Department of Ag and Department of Energy people
 from a western state in a couple of weeks.  They are ready, willing, and
 able to help start-up people and this is not BIG BUSINESS or
 industry.  This is a community project that is intended to be cloned
 throughout the state.  And it is biomass focused on waste materials.  No
 fertilizers or pesticides involved!!!
 
  Biofuel is suspected to be a carbon wells but with a bad ecological 
  balance when produced even from organic and extensive agriculture if
 far 
  from consumption places and if the fuel needs heavy process.
 
 We have discussed this problem at length in this forum.  Regional and 
 community level energy resource development must follow after 
 conservation, otherwise, we'll end up with Big Agribusiness displacing 
 Big Oil.
 
  One of the only ecologicaly interresting way right now is in a short 
  circuit meaning local organic production of vegetal oil and local 
  consumption in basic diesel motors (or more efficient special built
 ones)
 
 So why can't you guys understand that there are two players in the
 biofuels arena.  Biodiesel and Fuel Ethanol.  Fuel ethanol is quite
 legal in most places and can utilize waste materials.  I sound like a
 broken record, but the premises is that many SMALL PRODUCTION FACILITIES
 can do more ultimate good than the huge facilities supported by the
 government.  And we intend to prove this again and again and again.  I
 hope to set up a web site soon.  All it takes is time and money and/ or
 a little know how.
 
 You have your finger on an important principle.  As you describe
 
 further on, sometimes government gets in the way of such progress. 
 This is true in Canada as well.  I cannot produce ethanol for my 
 vehicle where I live.  It's illegal to do so.  I'm allowed to waste a 
 lot of electricity making hydrogen from the grid (and run my vehicle 
 on H2), but I'm not permitted to distill ethanol.  There are farms all 
 over the valley where I live that simply burn their agricultural 
 residue and pollute the air (rather than gasifying it for energy), 
 but I can't aid in cleaning the airshed by burning ethanol in my truck.
 
 And you mentioned two important things in this paragraph.  First, our
 system to make fuel ethanol runs on cellulosic waste.  And second, our
 system comes with a generator that produces electricity.  What you do
 with that electricity is your business.  You can sell it back to the
 electrical company or use it for your own purposes...even to produce
 hydrogen, if you like.  Perhaps you should be working toward legalizing
 fuel ethanol at this time.  And when you are ready to set up a real
 system and do some real good, we can help.
 
 Peggy
 
 

Re: [Biofuel] Fwd: Kyoto clears last hurdle / Scientists againstBush/ U.S. can end oil use

2004-10-02 Thread Steve Spence

Global SO2 limits were attained (and were they strict enough?), or was the
pollution just shoved somewhere else?

- Original Message - 
From: John Hayes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2004 10:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Fwd: Kyoto clears last hurdle / Scientists
againstBush/ U.S. can end oil use


 Steve Spence wrote:
  Carbon trading of course is just a scam to allow you to buy polluting
rights
  from others while pretending everyone has a right to pollute just a
little.
 
  Carbon trading is not a good thing!

 I disagree. Cap and trade market programs have proven successful in the
 past. Witness the success of the SO2 credit market in the US. Attainment
 of SO2 limits has been achieved at lower cost and more quickly than
 expected.

 http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/articles/clearingtheair.pdf

 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] Model fuel

2004-10-02 Thread Steve Spence

try some veggie with alcohol.

Steve Spence
http://www.green-trust.org
- Original Message - 
From: Jeffrey Kumjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2004 3:14 PM
Subject: [Biofuel] Model fuel


 Can you make a model aircraft engine run on biofuel? Jeffrey
 
 
 
 ___
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
 http://vote.yahoo.com
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



RE: [Biofuel] US DOE examines long-term oil supply scenarios

2004-10-01 Thread Steve Spence

I wonder where he thinks they will get the hydrogen from, and how much
he thinks folks will be willing to pay for it .

Steve Spence

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Johnston, Don
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 11:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Biofuel] US DOE examines long-term oil supply scenarios

Guys, I discussed the issue of 'known oil reserves' with Ray Noble, who
is in charge of the UK's BP SOLAR Programme. I raised the issue that the
'reserve window' kept expanding, ie when the oil companies were down to
20-25 years 'known' reserves, all of a sudden they found more, and
consequently the known reserve window expands to a new time horizon. Ray
acknowledged that this used to be the case but affirmed that all the
major oil companies now knew where ALL the oil and gas was, and that
there was no more to be found, it was simply a matter of how easy ,or
how expensive it was going to be to extract from each reserve.
 He then went on to affirm that, and I try to quote from memory, 'that
BP does not expect to be selling petrol, diesel, or LPG on its station
forecourts by 2035, it expects to be selling hydrogen.'.
I have absolutely no wish to upset this biodiesel fraternity,
but note that he did not say to me that BP expects to be selling
biodiesel. This was only a couple of years ago.curious. 

Don Johnston
Environmental Coordinator , Portsmouth City Council
Chair, Solent Energy and Environment Management Group

Winner ; National Champion-Science and Technology, Green Apple Awards
2002

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Tel: 023 9283 4247


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Keith Addison
Sent: 30 September 2004 15:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Biofuel] US DOE examines long-term oil supply scenarios


DieselNet UPDATE
September 2004
http://www.dieselnet.com/


US DOE examines long-term oil supply scenarios

The Energy Information Administration (EIA) of the US Department of 
Energy (DOE) has released a study that examined long-term supply 
scenarios for world petroleum. Under the most likely scenario-- 
assuming a 2% annual growth rate for world's oil demand and the mean 
value for the amount of oil reserves--the study predicts that 
petroleum production will reach its peak in 2037.

The study is a re-release of an oil supply prognosis originally 
published in July 2000, prompted in part by the increasing fuel 
prices in the USA. There has been no new information or developments 
that would significantly alter the year 2000 results, stated the EIA. 
The study is based on estimates of world's oil resources by the US 
Geological Survey. The EIA estimated that the world's growth in oil 
demand will be 1.9% through 2025.

The critical event in world oil production will be when it reaches 
its peak. The following decline in oil production would leave some 
oil demand unsatisfied, likely leading to significant price 
increases. The date of the peak depends on the rate of demand growth 
and assumed reserves. Twelve scenarios were examined in the study, 
for different oil demand growth rate (0-3%) and different oil 
reserves. The potential dates for the peak oil production ranged from 
2021 to 2112.

Only conventionally reservoired crude oil reserves were analyzed in 
the study. Additional petroleum supply is expected from 
unconventional sources. Commercial production has already started 
from such sources as the Canadian tar sands and Venezuelan heavy oils.

While the EIA analysis is less alarming than some other reports, its 
authors noted that the results do not justify complacency about both 
supply- and demand-side research and development.

The EIA also prepares short-term energy outlook reports, published 
monthly. In the most recent September issue, the EIA revised the 
projected world oil demand growth for 2004 to 3.2% (from a previous 
prediction of 2.5%) above the 2003 demand. Strong demand from China 
accounts for much of the upward revision. Global oil demand growth in 
2005 is expected to slow down to 2.4% due to the increased oil prices.

Long term outlook:
http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/feature_articles/2004/wor 
ldoilsupply/oilsupply04.html

Short term outlook:
http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/steo/pub/contents.html
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


**
This e-mail is for the intended recipient only.
If an addressing, transmission or other error has 
misdirected this e-mail, please notify the author
by replying to this e-mail.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not
use, disclose, distribute, copy, print

RE: [Biofuel] Question about biodiesel

2004-10-01 Thread Steve Spence

My '83 vw rabbit does, but my Detroit Diesel generator does not.

Steve Spence
www.green-trust.org


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Legal Eagle
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 9:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Question about biodiesel

It is my understanding that ALL diesels need a glow plug ignition of
some
sort.
Luc
- Original Message - 
From: frag lag [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 1:21 PM
Subject: [Biofuel] Question about biodiesel


 i have an old italian compression diesel here (500cc) , a no runner at
the
 moment , would biodiesel work in it or do i need an ignition source
 (glowplug)

 _
 Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
 http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



RE: [Biofuel] US DOE examines long-term oil supply scenarios

2004-10-01 Thread Steve Spence

1. reserves until they are depleted
2. pollutants can be separated

Those two statements are greatly deserving of thought.

Steve Spence


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 10:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Biofuel] US DOE examines long-term oil supply scenarios

 I wonder where he thinks they will get the hydrogen from, and how much
 he thinks folks will be willing to pay for it .

 Steve Spence


Steve,

If its the UK you are referring to, how about their unused inferior coal
reserves until they are depleted? Laid-off coal miners would be happy
for
work again and pollutants can be separated from the stream BEFORE the
energy is consumed, unlike trying to capture pollants post combustion as
in conventional coal burning.

Try these links for more:
http://www.zeca.org/
http://www.princeton.edu/~chm333/2002/fall/co_two/minerals/zec.htm#_ftn4
http://www.aig.asn.au/News_2003/zero_emissions.htm

The above concept is just that...conceptual.
One article said the two disadvantages of using coal are:
1) transport and storage of the hydrogen after production--this would
be
the case for any hydrogen production process that would be for vehicle
use, I suspect.

2) 'scarring' of the earth surface from surface mining ('open cast' for
the Europeans). This has largely become a non-issue when government
regulations are strictly enforced. First hand observation in Wyoming's
Powder River Basin and the Buelah area in North Dakota can attest to
that.

Ron B.
===
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Johnston, Don
 Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 11:23 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [Biofuel] US DOE examines long-term oil supply scenarios

 Guys, I discussed the issue of 'known oil reserves' with Ray Noble,
who
 is in charge of the UK's BP SOLAR Programme. I raised the issue that
the
 'reserve window' kept expanding, ie when the oil companies were down
to
 20-25 years 'known' reserves, all of a sudden they found more, and
 consequently the known reserve window expands to a new time horizon.
Ray
 acknowledged that this used to be the case but affirmed that all the
 major oil companies now knew where ALL the oil and gas was, and that
 there was no more to be found, it was simply a matter of how easy ,or
 how expensive it was going to be to extract from each reserve.
  He then went on to affirm that, and I try to quote from memory, 'that
 BP does not expect to be selling petrol, diesel, or LPG on its station
 forecourts by 2035, it expects to be selling hydrogen.'.
   I have absolutely no wish to upset this biodiesel fraternity,
 but note that he did not say to me that BP expects to be selling
 biodiesel. This was only a couple of years ago.curious.

 Don Johnston
 Environmental Coordinator , Portsmouth City Council
 Chair, Solent Energy and Environment Management Group

 Winner ; National Champion-Science and Technology, Green Apple Awards
 2002

 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Tel: 023 9283 4247

___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] Solar Hydrogen

2004-09-25 Thread Steve Spence

At $10 / GGE equivalent, I just bet buyers will be lining up to get their
fill ...

- Original Message - 
From: MH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 1:01 AM
Subject: [Biofuel] Solar Hydrogen


Solar hydrogen - energy of the future
 26 August 2004
 http://www.unsw.edu.au/news/adv/articles/2004/aug/Solar_hydrogen.html
   A team of Australian scientists predicts that a revolutionary new way to
harness
 the power of the sun to extract clean and almost unlimited energy supplies
from
 water will be a reality within seven years.
   Solar hydrogen, Professor Sorrell argues, is not incompatible with coal.
 It can be used to produce solar methanol, which produces less carbon
dioxide
 than conventional methods. As a mid-term energy carrier it has a lot to
say
 for it, he says


 New Process Could Help Make Hydrogen Fuel Affordable
 Stephanie Peatling in Sydney for National Geographic News
 August 27, 2004

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/08/0827_040827_hydrogen_energy.html

 Scientists in Australia say they have have made a breakthrough in
 the efficiency of using sunlight to generate hydrogen from water.
 It may be a step toward an affordable source of clean energy.

 A renewable source of energy to replace the world's declining fossil
 fuel reserves is perhaps the scientific community's holy grail.
 Hydrogen is all around us. It is seen by many as the cleanest and
 most efficient fuel for powering everything from vehicles to
 furnaces and air-conditioning-if only we can find an affordable
 way to harness it.

 Now two researchers in Australia say they have made substantial
 progress. Scientists have known for a long time how to split water
 into its two elements, oxygen and hydrogen. But the problem is that
 the process requires electricity-typically derived from fossil
 fuels-which makes the process counterproductive and expensive.

 Janusz Nowotny and Charles Sorrell are researchers from the
 Centre for Materials Research in Energy Conversion at the
 University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia. They have
 been looking for an economical way to use titanium dioxide to act
 as a catalyst to split water into oxygen and hydrogen-using solar
 energy.

 The Stuff of Toothpaste

 Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is widely used as a white pigment in paint,
 paper, cosmetics, sunscreens, and toothpastes. It is found in its
 purest form in rutile, a beach sand but is also extracted from
 certain ores. Rio Tinto, a mining company that produces titanium
 oxide, helps fund Nowotny's and Sorrell's research.

 Nowotny and Sorrell announced their breakthrough today at the
 International Conference on Materials for Hydrogen Energy, hosted
 by the University of New South Wales in Sydney. They believe
 they have found a way to considerably improve the productivity of
 the solar hydrogen process (using sunlight to extract hydrogen
 from water) using a device made out of titanium dioxide.

 This is potentially huge, with a market the size of all the existing
 markets for coal, oil, and gas combined,'' Nowotny said in a news
 statement released ahead of the conference. Based on our research
 results, we know we are on the right track.

 Although Australia's sunny climate makes it an ideal place to
 generate solar energy, Sorrell said the technology could be used
 anywhere in the world.

 It's been the dream of many people for a long time to develop it,
 and it's exciting to know it's within such close reach, Sorrell said.

 Honda-Fujishima Effect

 The Australians' research has not been tested yet by other
 scientists, although the findings were applauded by the pioneers of
 the solar hydrogen process, Akira Fujishima and Kenichi Honda.

 In 1967 the Japanese scientists discovered that titanium dioxide
 could be used to extract hydrogen from water in a process that has
 become known as the Honda-Fujishima effect. The finding was
 reported in the journal Nature and led to numerous awards,
 including the 2004 Japan Prize in the category
 Chemical Technology for the Environment.

 Hydrogen is very simple but very efficient,'' said Fujishima,
 who is also in Sydney for today's conference. We must keep
 working hard on it.''

 Since the 1967 discovery much research has focused on the
 materials that might be used to split water with sunlight.

 Fujishima, chairman of the Kanagawa Academy of Science and
 Technology, says using titanium dioxide as a catalyst means
 energy production will result in cleaner air, cleaner water,
 and a cleaner atmosphere.

 Many Years to Hydrogen Power

 The world is still a long way off from large-scale conversion from
 fossil fuels to hydrogen for its energy needs. For one thing, the
 Honda-Fujishima effect, even if it is greatly enhanced by the
 research breakthrough announced today, still has to be adapted into
 devices that can be used on a commercially viable scale. Engineers
 will have to design fuel cells that collect sunlight from 

[Biofuel] The VeggieGen is running Veggie!

2004-09-25 Thread Steve Spence

The VeggieGen is running Veggie! Sorta 
Tonight we fired up on 50/50 Kerosene and Waste Vegetable Oil. The
Detroit Diesel is loving the mix and is purring like a kitten!
Smells sweet. The details of our oil filtration system are coming
shortly. Tomorrow the heat exchanger gets installed in the Veggie
tank for V100 (100% Veggie). We also hope to get the muffler installed .

See the full article at

http://www.green-trust.org/wiki/index.php?title=Green-Trust_Heat_%
26_Power_System

http://tinyurl.com/52a4v


www.green-trust.org

___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: Was Re: [Biofuel] Changing Government/Now ethanol

2004-09-25 Thread Steve Spence

Environmental problems for kerosene (paraffin to you, we think paraffin is
something you can jellies with) are the same as gasoline and diesel. It's a
finite fossil fuel that produces pollution and green house gases.

Why not do yourself a favor, and run ethanol in that petrol engine, or get a
diesel and run biodiesel or veggie oil.



- Original Message - 
From: Phil Rendell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 5:10 AM
Subject: RE: Was Re: [Biofuel] Changing Government/Now ethanol


Hello all!

Is there anyone out there who has tried running a petrol motor on paraffin?
I know the timing needs retarding and that performance is terrible, but here
in Africa, the fuel is very, very cheap.

What are the environmental implications of burning the stuff and
implications for engine life?

Phil Rendel
English Department
Kingswood College,
Burton Street,
Grahamstown
tel. 046 603 6600
fax. 046 622 3084
cell: 084 448 1052


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Keith Addison
Sent: 20 September 2004 08:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Was Re: [Biofuel] Changing Government/Now ethanol


Ken.

Please take a look at
http://www.eesi.org/programs/agriculture/Energy%20Balance%20update.htm
on Biofuels: energy balance.
Hans

Very nice too Hans, thanks.

There's also this:

http://www.mda.state.mn.us/Ethanol/balance.html
Energy Balance/Life Cycle Inventory for Ethanol, Biodiesel and Petroleum
Fuels

And a whole lot more here:

http://journeytoforever.org/ethanol_energy.html
Is ethanol energy-efficient?

Best

Keith


- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2004 12:01 AM
Subject: Was Re: [Biofuel] Changing Government/Now ethanol


   The reason the government is promoting ethanol
   production is because of the farm lobby. In general
   the production of ethanol is an energy loss. The
   fossil fuels used to plow, fertilize, ferment and
   distill ethanol require the input of more energy than
   is obtained from the ethanol produced.
   Ken
  ==
  Sorry Ken, but your data is about 24 years behind the times. I believe
it
  was a 1980 paper from Cornell U. or something similiar, that mentioned
  that ethanol was energy negative. Some things never want to die.
 
  I remember stopping in Madison Wisconsin to gas up on my way to Chicago
a
  few years ago. I pulled into a gas station and the gas station attendant
  noticed my Minnesota lic. plates (read: 10% ethanol). He proudly
  proclaimed that his gas had none of that worthless ethanol in it. I
asked
  him what his feelings were about ethanol and he said it ruins engines. I
  said, Reeeally, I have over 200,000 miles on my truck and never had a
  problem with the engine. He then asked me for the money owed for the
gas
  and that was the end of that. 8~)
 
  Maybe ethanol isn't going to reduce oil dependency, but it will replace
  the use of Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE). I believe 3.3 billion
  gallons yearly of ethanol are being produced now. To replace all the
nasty
  MTBE put in gas in the USA, they'll need another 11-12 billion gallons
of
  ethanol for a 10% mix.
 
  When people live in California where MTBE is manufactured and they have
to
  quit using it and ship in tank cars of ethanolthey will complain.
  What's surprising is that California politicians that scream about
taking
  care of the environment also don't want to ban the nasty MTBE and resort
  to importing ethanol. Let them eat cake.
 
  Ron B.

___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] good reading

2004-09-20 Thread Steve Spence

That 1980 Mercedes we converted this weekend was one of the nicest examples
of an old car  that I have seen  in a while. No rust, not a lot of
clutter, easy  to work  on.

Only 26 mpg, but it's a  wagon, and heavy. With free veggie, the mpg isn't
as critical.


- Original Message - 
From: Erik Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] good reading



 --- tommy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Here is a good reading piece if your wondering about
  why it's pretty much a waste to try to get those
  Cheap running junkers working and focus on new
  tech
  engines.

 Thank you for posting that link. I enjoyed reading it.
 But I disagree with your conclusions. As nice as a new
 diesel is I am still going to keep my 23 year old audi
 diesel. Once you consider that I only have about $500
 into it not counting fuel or oil changes and that it
 gets 50 mpg I don't see how the new ones are any
 better. But of course they're much fancier, with all
 the electronics and latest options. The new ones will
 also blow mine off the road for speed and power. But
 those don't concern me. I know that for a lot of
 people they are very important, and those are the ones
 that I would try to talk into getting a newer one.

 The old ones also use very simple technology, which
 for me means that I can fix it all myself without
 taking it in. Not including the injection pump, of
 course. (Though I do have the computer scanners to be
 able to do everything on the newer ones as well, but
 that's cause it's what I do. Just saying that most
 people can work on the older ones and the newer ones
 become harder and more complicated.)

 I'm all for diesels. I love them. And the new ones
 have a lot of nice advantages. I really wish that with
 20+ years of technology advancements it would have
 that much better fuel mileage than mine, but they just
 don't. I just don't see all that as a reason to
 abandon the old ones. If I can at all I will drive
 these old tech ones for many years more. The only
 thing I see stopping me is them getting wrecked.

 Just my opinion, of course.

 Erik


 
  This tech is what the Big fuel petro industrial
  fuel
  suppliers will get the gov to back instead of
  bio-fuel, keeping themselves in the loop
 
  http://www.boschusa.com/dieselvoice.pdf
 
 
 




 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
 http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >