the first test would not compile since
it is "public class bug8160986 " in bug8031573.java ?:-)
-yan
On 07/27/2016 12:08 AM, Phil Race wrote:
Since I noticed it right away, I am sure lots of others will soon
enough.
-phil.
On 07/25/2016 02:19 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On
/**
- * Sets the {@code TreeCellRenderer} to {@code tcr}. This invokes
- * {@code updateRenderer}.
+ * Called when the {@code cellRenderer} property is changed in
+ * the drawn tree component.
*
- * @param tcr the new value
+ * @param tcr the new value of the
A meaningful name with some relevance to what the test tests ?
-phil.
On 07/19/2016 12:03 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
On 7/19/16 1:52 PM, Phil Race wrote:
The fix is fine but as I've said elsewhere I really don't like
BugXX as test names.
Hi Phil, I haven't seen any of your prior comments
The fix is fine but as I've said elsewhere I really don't like BugXX
as test names.
-phil.
On 07/19/2016 11:43 AM, Alexandr Scherbatiy wrote:
The fix looks good to me.
Thanks,
Alexandr.
On 7/19/2016 8:50 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
Look at .02 instead. I had an extraneous println left in
I imagine this was all done to maximise performance.
Is there any impact on SwingMark - try D3D both on & off ..
The change here :
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8160986/webrev.00/src/java.desktop/share/classes/javax/swing/plaf/metal/MetalScrollButton.java.sdiff.html
appears to handle only
Looks good to me .. +1
-phil.
On 08/08/2016 12:48 PM, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote:
Just a friendly reminder.
Thanks,
Alexandr.
On 27/06/16 22:17, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote:
Hello,
Could you review the updated fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8151303/webrev.02
The fix
I was not familiar with this "magic caret" but from reading it seems
like it has just one use/purpose.
In the event that someone has multi-line text that you can navigate
around with up/down arrow keys
and that text has lines of varying length, you want a "preferred"
horizontal position for the
+1
-phil.
On 08/08/2016 03:35 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Looks fine.
On 08.08.16 11:01, Alexandr Scherbatiy wrote:
Could you review the updated fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8162856/webrev.01/
- the image graphics is scaled before passed it to
CachedPainter.paintToImage()
Seems fine except for a grammatical issue in the javadoc
{@code true}. Setting the property to {@code false} either to {@literal L}
I think you mean ".. either on the ..."
-phil.
On 09/02/2016 05:30 AM, Alexandr Scherbatiy wrote:
Hello,
Could you review the fix:
bug:
drawPolyline does not seem to be an option here because of the different
colours.
Filling custom shapes may be overkill. Round looks to me to be the best
of these three.
-phil.
On 9/7/2016 9:19 AM, Alexandr Scherbatiy wrote:
On 9/6/2016 6:10 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
It seems that there
On 10/27/2016 11:52 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
On 10/27/16 1:47 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
On 10/27/16 1:34 PM, Phil Race wrote:
In which case be careful it is not built by the JDK build ..
Build team, Is there anything I need to handle here to make sure it isn't?
Actually, let me give it a try. I
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8169518
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8169518
The last set of deprecation warnings to be suppressed or fixed in
desktop - so
with this fix we can re-enable javac lint checking of deprecation.
I have used JPRT to verify this builds on all
I've been testing this by re-enabling deprecation so
On 11/02/2016 10:50 PM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
Do we need the suppression in JavaSoundAudioClip.java as I could not
find any mention of Applet in that class?
In AppletViewer.java
shouldn't we need to add "deprecation" to
45
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8155874
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8155874/
This hits all across the desktop module, hence the cross-post.
The Class.newInstance() has been deprecated since it
may throw checked exceptions that are not declared.
On 10/18/2016 03:54 AM, Alexandr Scherbatiy wrote:
On 10/18/2016 12:42 AM, Philip Race wrote:
Hi,
First note that any of the alternatives here require an approved CCC
before pushing.
As I wrote in the bug the fields in JRootPane are not used. Making it
a public supertype
is no more
SQE reports some 35 tests fail as a result of this bug.
I am backing out the change that caused it from our PIT and need a reviewer.
SQE will verify this before I push.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8167988
Fix :
hg diff
I believe it is equivalent - just a bit more clear to be explicit.
At least that is what I found with the deprecation one on the same line.
-phil.
On 10/19/2016 10:24 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 19.10.16 20:05, Phil Race wrote:
is it necessary to add "exports" to "-Xli
On 10/19/2016 09:16 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Did you check this fix on other platforms?
For example what about WindowsFileChooserUI.java:
DirectoryComboBoxRenderer createDirectoryComboBoxRenderer()
Note than DirectoryComboBoxRenderer is not public.
I looked at those the other day and I
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8169887
webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8169887/
8155874 changed many calls from the deprecated Class.newInstance()
to Class.getDeclaredConstructor().newInstance().
However in the cases where the called code may be loaded from
a different
The assumption that just because values *can* be non-integral that
they *will* be non-integral is not valid. Even if you know that the
probability is small, it is not zero.
This seems like it could lead to spurious failures of this test.
-phil.
On 11/15/2016 09:18 AM, Alexandr Scherbatiy
Bug : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8167182
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8167182/
There are three fields exposed in the accessibility docs which are of types
that are not exported :
.
Thanks,
Alexandr.
On 11/15/2016 9:52 PM, Phil Race wrote:
The assumption that just because values *can* be non-integral that
they *will* be non-integral is not valid. Even if you know that the
probability is small, it is not zero.
This seems like it could lead to spurious failures of this test
This all seems fine.
Do other accessbridge files still have the remnants of SCCS ? :-
That was purged from all the other JDK files when we moved to mercurial.
33 /*
34 * @(#)AccessBridgeCalls.c 1.25 05/08/22
35 */
If "yes", then I suggest to file a clean-up bug to clean up all of
No, we are definitely shipping those.
Unless of course you think we should stop shipping JNI headers too ...
-phil
On 10/27/2016 10:37 AM, Mandy Chung wrote:
Should they be kept just in the source and not to be included in the
image/include directory?
It’s not clear to me if anyone needs
+1.
I am assuming you made sure AccessBridgeCalls.c is not being compiled
during the JDK build as discussed earlier ...
-phil.
On 10/31/2016 07:36 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
On 10/28/16 8:14 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On Oct 28, 2016, at 1:59 PM, Philip Race wrote:
If it
One big problem I see with this is that it means they will only be
available under the GPL license
as they will not be in an Oracle JDK which strips the GPL
So if you are going to do this then these files first need to be
dual-licensed
because otherwise people can't link their commercial
+1
-phil.
On 11/28/2016 08:41 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hello.
Please review the fix for jdk9.
This fix improve encapsulation of java.desktop module. After the fix
the method "UIDefaults::addResourceBundle()" will not be able to
register resource bundles which are located in the
I just noticed that you spell the new methods with a single d :eg :
getFPMethodOverriden
Like the variables that were there before it should be getFPMethodOverridden
and checkFPMethodOverridden
Also, although rather unlikely to be a problem in practice, since there
is nothing in the swing
821
822 static boolean getFPMethodOverriden(Class cls, String method,
823 FPMethodArgs methodArgs) {
824 FPMethodItem methodItem = new FPMethodItem(cls, method); Where are
the definitions of the types FPMethodItem and FPMethodArgs ?
842 methodArgs.getMethodAruments(false),
843
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8171074
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8171074/
Other than the @SuppressWarnings,
UIManager.setLookAndFeel(String className) is now reverted
to how it was before 8155874
-phil.
Looks OK except for a couple of typo nits below. You can fix those
without a new review However you will need a CCC for deprecating the
public API AppletInitializer and the Beans.instantiate method which
references it 159 * @deprecated It s recommended to use
"It is" ?
--
160 * {@link
Scherbatiy wrote:
On 12/16/2016 2:36 AM, Phil Race wrote:
I just noticed that you spell the new methods with a single d :eg :
getFPMethodOverriden
Like the variables that were there before it should be
getFPMethodOverridden
and checkFPMethodOverridden
Here is the updated fix where the typo
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8171363
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8171363/
this is mostly about jtreg syntax.
A few tests fail due to the updated module system spec.
jtreg needs to allow them to access package private fields.
":open" is added on the tests that do
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8043773/
bug : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043773
This just deprecates the un-used, un-needed inner classs.
A CCC was approved ages ago however the fix was never pushed and I can't
find
any evidence a code review was even submitted.
Since
SwingUtilities2.getAndSetAntialisingHintForScaledGraphics()
sets the AA rendering hint only for local display.
- The SwingUtilities2.setAntialiasingHintForScaledGraphics() method
javadoc is updated to mention that the null AA rendering hint means
that the passed graphics is not instance of Graphics2D.
On 3/16/2017 7:
Hi,
It looks to me as if this applies AA rendering even when you
are drawing using G2D calls. Why ?
Also this clearly only helps Metal. Is that because only Metal has such
problems ?
I would doubt that.
FWIW Motif L probably should not get this treatment.
Also if the desktop is "remote" we
Fine by me.
I am curious why a compilation failure wasn't found immediately ?
-phil.
On 03/17/2017 01:37 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hello,
Please review the fix for jdk9.
This test uses "ToolBarBorder.MetalBumps" which is not accessible because it is
not public.
The code was updated to use
OK. In that case I am fine with it.
I expect a small swingmark hit but that is the price we need to pay here.
-phil.
On 03/16/2017 11:46 AM, Alexandr Scherbatiy wrote:
On 3/16/2017 9:16 PM, Phil Race wrote:
Hi,
What I was referring to regarding "draws using G2D calls" was that
2122 if(i > 0) { should be "if (i > 0) {" Can you comment on what tests
have been run to ensure this does not regress anything else ? -phil.
On 03/31/2017 04:28 AM, Mikhail Cherkasov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the fix for jdk9?
The problem is that Parser reads extra symbol after
it.
-phil.
On 04/05/2017 03:36 AM, Mikhail Cherkasov wrote:
Hi Phil,
On 4/4/2017 9:13 PM, Phil Race wrote:
2122 if(i > 0) { should be "if (i > 0) {"
fixed: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mcherkas/8177450/9/webrev.01/
Can you comment on what tests have been run to ensure this d
Minor nit, a wildcard import in the test :-
31 import javax.swing.*;
-phil
On 04/13/2017 06:16 AM, Mikhail Cherkasov wrote:
Hi Sergey,
Right, a test case can be written without use of JAWS or other screen
readers.
Please find a new webrev with the test there:
-8186003
On 08.08.2017 10:41, Phil Race wrote:
I think the removal of AquaL and NimbusL merit a CSR request
since they
were in their different time and ways supported ways of invoking each
of these L
-phil.
On 08/08/2017 10:34 AM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
I don't have any concerns with this. Phil
+1
-phil.
On 07/20/2017 01:45 AM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
Hi All,
This is a back-out of 6461834: Minimize WindowsLookAndFeel classes
included with Unix JDKs
fix which was done to make sure WindowsLookAndFeel classes are not
built for non-windows platform
but it seems there are some
OK. +1. No point in adding constants right now.
I had thought the change that introduced this was not related to hidpi
but it was not ..
and it was a bit larger than I'd have expected this late in the release.
-phil.
On 04/26/2017 08:41 AM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
I don't see any issues with
It would be good to file a bug capturing as much as you can how to
reproduce this
and pointers to where you think the problem lies.
It sounds like it may be code related to trying to support hi-dpi but that
will become clearer with the additional info.
-phil.
On 8/16/2017 12:44 PM, Alan Snyder
e in the jaxp
repo ... pretty much all tables there now have a reasonable, visible
caption.
-- Jon
On 05/17/2017 11:19 AM, Phil Race wrote:
I am not sure we are using the summary in a way that makes it
worthwhile.
As you noted in the other mail
"The summary attribute was us
I've looked through all the files now. No other comments. So approved.
-phil.
On 05/17/2017 11:19 AM, Phil Race wrote:
I am not sure we are using the summary in a way that makes it worthwhile.
As you noted in the other mail
"The summary attribute was used to give a more descriptive
I am not sure we are using the summary in a way that makes it worthwhile.
As you noted in the other mail
"The summary attribute was used to give a more descriptive value
of the contents of the table. A caption is more like a title"
The values I see are more like a title and as you say that is
The way to do this is to create a file
src/java.desktop/windows/classes/module-info.java.extra
and move the opens there.
See for example
src/java.base/windows/classes/module-info.java.extra
But are you sure jdk.jconsole needs these only on Windows ?
Better make sure of it.
-phil.
On
+1
-phil.
On 05/11/2017 12:31 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Thanks, Looks fine.
- mikhail.cherka...@oracle.com wrote:
>
Hi Sergey,
>
> it's the same problem as in
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076249
>
> AccessBridge trys to request information from obsoleted
This all looks OK to me.
-phil.
On 05/04/2017 06:15 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hello,
Please review the fix for jdk9-dev.
This fix is a part of the effort to make all javadoc in jdk9 be compatible to
HTML5.
In the fix the most common issues are fixed.
The issues related to tables will be
771 * @implNote Please note that for Mac OS, notifications
772 * are only sent if the Java app is a bundled application,
773 * with a {@code CFBundleDocumentTypes} array present in its
774 * Info.plist.
Should we be using {@code ..} for CFBundleDocumentTypes. It is not Java
The JDK 10 repo consolidation [1] is about to begin.
All the JDK forests need to be frozen to make this happen .. as per this
excerpt from the email below
//>/We're aiming to have the final pre-consolidation integrations of the />/hs and client
forests into JDK 10 master the week of August 28
This change is also huge. How did you do this ? Manually ?
There should be diffs of the files generated this way and the files
generated by JAXB
so we can compare. Ideally they'd be byte-for-byte identical but failing
that it should
be trivial to see that any diffs are insignificant.
-phil.
If it makes the test pass ..
+1
-phil.
On 10/11/2017 11:37 AM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Please review fix for JDK10 (the changes involve AWT and Swing):
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8180821
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssadetsky/8180821/webrev.00/
This is a
+1
-phil.
On 9/27/2017 11:21 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 9/25/17 10:34, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
ObjectFactory.java was missed from the webrev. It should be deleted
actually.
The updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssadetsky/8187599/webrev.01/
Looks fine.
I see this opens was moved to platform-specific code ... 115 opens
com.sun.java.swing.plaf.windows to
116 jdk.jconsole;
So jdk.jconsole definitely accesses this only on Windows ?
-phil.
On 11/28/2017 09:28 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
From a build point of view, this looks great.
/Erik
On
This is a one line fix for a potential small leak .. the char* variable
profilePath will not
be freed in the case that when used it would make too long a path.
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8191767
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8191767/
-phil.
From memory, I think Sergey is right that the jtreg default time out is
2 minutes (120 seconds).
As to changing that to 3 minutes .. that is something that needs to be
decided at a jtreg ownership level.
A little off topic, but I've sometimes pondered if jtreg ought to have
an option to avoid
Hi,
Whilst I could perhaps provide some very minor tweaks to the wording you
are adding, I would first like to understand the details of why the
rendering
becomes broken here since there doesn't seem to be anything intrinsically
wrong - only the model is being updated.
I've found that
I think we should push this fix, although there are concerns we can't
immediately demonstrate
that Math.ceil may be wrong in some theoretical case.
Also Sergey, please add a comment in the bug report about the
alternative fix you mentioned
that was discussed previously so that can be
Protocol is that there first be a bug report and then a "RFR" (request
for review) is sent
to the list referencing the bug + the fix
I have filed https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8191041
and verified that it works. So we can perhaps short-circuit that this
time .. but not next time ..
This thread is very long and despite trying I am sure I have not
absorbed every discussion point to date.
I think a concise summary of the current opinions from Semyon would help as
I don't yet see a concensus emerging and if we are adding a new public
API we need to be sure that
1) It is
at the patch and filing a report.
Michael
On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 at 05:52, Phil Race <philip.r...@oracle.com
<mailto:philip.r...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Protocol is that there first be a bug report and then a "RFR" (request
for review) is sent
to the list referen
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8190475
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8190475/
Nor will Java2Demo .. and at least one beans test is failing (hanging)
in the same place.
All hanging in the new code added by the fix for
6463710: ListSelectionModel.setSelectionMode()
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8189809
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8189809/
This partially addresses a slow-down in Swing.
Swing now usually calls Font.getStringBounds() instead of
FontMetrics().stringWidth for text measurement.
The latter has a fast-path for
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193211
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8193211/
adds jdk_swing_core and jdk_desktop_core test groups to jtreg
Also problem lists many (by no means all) of the known jtreg failures.
-phil
ttp://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ekaddepalli/8187936/webrev01/>
Regards,
Krishna
*From:*Phil Race
*Sent:* Wednesday, December 6, 2017 10:17 PM
*To:* Krishna Addepalli <krishna.addepa...@oracle.com>;
swing-dev@openjdk.java.net
*Subject:* Re: [10][JDK-8187936] Automatically selecting a
new JTree nod
t i = listeners.length-2; i>=0;
i-=2) { if (listeners[i]==TreeModelListener.class) { // Lazily create
the event: if (e == null) e = new
TreeModelEvent(source, path, childIndices, children);
((TreeModelListener)listeners[i+1]).treeNodesInserted(e); } } }
Thanks,
Krishna
*From
On 12/06/2017 09:39 AM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 12/06/2017 08:33 AM, Phil Race wrote:
Hi,
I have some additional comments on this old review thread. Hopefully
we can close it out soon
although it will need a CSR whatever ..
Since the implementation of ShellFolderManager filters out
Hi,
I have some additional comments on this old review thread. Hopefully we
can close it out soon
although it will need a CSR whatever ..
Since the implementation of ShellFolderManager filters out inaccessible
files we
should document this somewhere.
I suggest either on the class or relevant
(),
2614 tl.getAscent() + tl.getDescent() +
2615 tl.getLeading());
Note that the second parameter is negative, is it intentionally changed?
On 07/12/2017 12:54, Phil Race wrote:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8189809
webrev: http
Two quick comments.
1) I'd like "Peer" removed from all the exported API.
2) It is probably stable enough now that you can start to add some javadoc.
-phil.
On 05/04/2018 05:00 AM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
Hi All,
Please review an enhancement to remove the tight coupling of JDK
internal
I am not sure this is the right fix.
If the intention had been to change all calls to getTabbedTextOffset()
to use the FP
API it would have just been changed .. rather than adding a new API that
provides
the option to specify whether to use FP.
So perhaps the problem is that internal code
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202811
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8202811/
This started out as wanting to problem list a few tests that left
windows open
or otherwise did not terminate. And these are in there, but I also tried
to clean up
most of the reproducible
PS .. I forgot I wanted to piggy back an update to TEST.ROOT to
add some remaining directories for jtreg to use othervm mode :
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8202811.1/
-phil.
On 05/11/2018 10:46 AM, Phil Race wrote:
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202811
webrev: http
of the tests fail because of some unrelated
issues(other tests or some setup issues), at least some of them works
fine on my mac, for example:
java/awt/Choice/ChoicePopupLocation/ChoicePopupLocation.java 8202931
macosx-all
On 11/05/2018 12:08, Phil Race wrote:
PS .. I forgot I wanted to piggy
sorry about that.. +1 again.
-phil.
On 05/11/2018 02:48 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
The fix problemList is updated after JDK-8202811[1] was pushed:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8202878/webrev.01
[1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8202811.1/
On 10/05/2018 18:45, Philip Race wrote:
+1
+1
-phil.
On 05/02/2018 07:04 PM, Muneer Kolarkunnu wrote:
Hi All,
Please review the following, a new client sanity test case:
Task: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8197948
Webrev Link:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~akolarkunnu/8197948/webrev.01/
+1 from me for the JDK changes.
-phil.
On 06/13/2018 06:04 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
The JDK changes look good to me, and as far as I have tested them, it
works for me. I haven't tried Drag and Drop yet with the latest
interface changes.
To repeat something I've mentioned before, just so
you surely mean
@since 11
I believe it has been verified that it is excluded from the docs build
.. right Prasanta ?
-phil
On 06/14/2018 01:26 PM, mandy chung wrote:
I reviewed the module-info.java change. @since 12 is missing in
jdk.unsupported.desktop module-info.java
Otherwise it's
+1
-phil.
On 06/15/2018 12:31 AM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
Webrev to add @since 11 to jdk.swing.interop classes (only difference
from .14)
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psadhukhan/fxswing.15/
I also tried submitting mach5 job from linux but it is failing to
download jib (although I
+1
-phil.
On 05/16/2018 08:16 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hello.
Please review the fix for jdk11, which fixed some accessibility issues
in the specification.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199150
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8150156
Fix:
, there was no regression with jck and jtreg tests with the fix.
Regards
Prasanta
On 5/9/2018 12:41 AM, Phil Race wrote:
I am not sure this is the right fix.
If the intention had been to change all calls to
getTabbedTextOffset() to use the FP
API it would have just been changed .. rather than adding a new
Bug: Uninitialised memory in WinAccessBridge.cpp:485
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8203499/
element is not initialised on declaration.
It should be initialised when its address is passed here
messageQueue->remove();
but it is too hard to prove, so just initialise it to NULL .. and
khan wrote:
On 5/9/2018 12:41 AM, Phil Race wrote:
I am not sure this is the right fix.
If the intention had been to change all calls to
getTabbedTextOffset() to use the FP
API it would have just been changed .. rather than adding a new API
that provides
the option to specify whether to use FP.
+1
-phil.
On 06/22/2018 12:50 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hello.
Please review the fix for jdk11.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8205454
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8205454/webrev.00
A few typos were fixed.
- In some cases it was caused by the JDK-8025230(Lamp;F
The bug was seen when switching L .. how is that related to
GraphicsConfiguration ?
-phil.
On 06/22/2018 01:48 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Any volunteers for review?
=)
On 17/06/2018 15:37, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Unfortunately after additional testing I found a bug in our text
related
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8196468
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8196468/
There's some noise in here as I moved the swing tests added last time to
be listed
next to other swing tests and grouped a few other tests together.
The biggest additions are a lot of
You added @headful to BadDisplayTest, but also added this logic - why ?
public class BadDisplayTest{
public static void main(String[] args) {
+ if (Boolean.getBoolean("java.awt.headless")) {
+ return;
+ }
-phil.
On 01/30/2018 11:47 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hello.
..
How would one do the same for excluding applets without tediously adding
this keyword.
Is there jtreg syntax to exclude '.*html' ? Which might be one way to do it.
-phil.
On 01/30/2018 11:57 AM, Phil Race wrote:
You added @headful to BadDisplayTest, but also added this logic - why ?
public
these entries platform generic.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8196468.1/ -phil.
On 01/30/2018 06:30 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Looks fine.
On 30/01/2018 16:07, Phil Race wrote:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8196468
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8196468/
There's some noise
it to them.
Thanks,
Krishna
*From:*Phil Race
*Sent:* Friday, February 16, 2018 10:38 PM
*To:* Krishna Addepalli <krishna.addepa...@oracle.com>; Semyon
Sadetsky <semyon.sadet...@oracle.com>; swing-dev@openjdk.java.net
*Subject:* Re: [11][JDK-8196673] JFileChooser throws
Inv
Right, what I said was that perhaps nio is behaving as specified in this
case.
If a standalone nio program can be written that shows nio contravening
its spec.
then a bug should be raised against nio. I did not verify what the case
is there ..
I just suggested that should be investigated.
1) Getting rid of the deleteOnExit - and the *need* for it is a good
thing here
as it is run when the VM exits. This is not a friendly thing to do when
an agentvm is being
used as it means that only after several hours when the whole test run
is done will the
files be deleted. Perhaps this test
+1
-phil
On 02/20/2018 07:10 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hello.
Please review update of the tests for jdk11.
The goal is to make our testing as stable as possible and exclude any
unstable tests(I have started from the tests which may be run in the
headless mode).
Bug:
+1 .. good to get these mac issues problem listed.
-phil.
On 2/26/2018 4:35 AM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
Hi All,
Please review the problem list updation for mac to weed out the test
that are failing at least once in few iterations.
I tested on mac 10.13.3. With this problem list, the test
Since you are updating these lines, maybe you could fix the grammar as
well as the spelling ? - * the most look and feels will not provide the
scrolling to the right/down.
+ * then most look and feels will not provide the scrolling to the
right/down.
- * up or down by large amount.
+1
-phil.
On 09/04/2018 12:52 AM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
Modified webrev caching the original antialias state and restoring it
at the end
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psadhukhan/8202013/webrev.1/
Regards
Prasanta
On 9/4/2018 4:58 AM, Philip Race wrote:
On 9/3/18, 12:24 AM, Prasanta
Bug : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8206375
One bug was closed as a dup of another, so the Problem List needs to be
updated
to refer to the one that is still open:
diff --git a/test/jdk/ProblemList.txt b/test/jdk/ProblemList.txt
--- a/test/jdk/ProblemList.txt
+++
101 - 200 of 433 matches
Mail list logo