Pascal Gloor wrote:
due the big problems on the swissix peering (all the time up and
downs) we deceided to temporary shut down the peering until all
problems have been solved.
we'll reactivate the interface when everything is confirmed to be
working again.
same here.
It seems to be a bigger
Dear all,
The SwissIX association is happy to announce that SwissIX Bern at
colobern.ch (http://www.colobern.ch/) is now ready for peering. Thanks
to the sponsors Fibrelac (http://www.fibrelac.ch) and NTS Workspace AG
(http://www.nts.ch/) who made it possible.
Please find infos how to get
Dear all,
please note that we expect an outage of the mailing list, as the hard
disk of the list server is about to die. We need to replace it asap.
...
hda: read_intr: status=0x59 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest Error }
hda: read_intr: error=0x40 { UncorrectableError }, LBAsect=18477623,
Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
please note that we expect an outage of the mailing list, as the hard
disk of the list server is about to die. We need to replace it asap.
We dumped this afternoon the current setup, and plan to restore it onto
a new harddisk tomorrow morning. Please expect some more downtime
Big topic at Nanog, anyone already debugged IP flow of the new
-toy
-tool
-weapon
-nightmare
(choose which suits you best)?
I wonder how much traffic the screensaver causes.
F.
___
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pascal Gloor wrote:
I'm looking for a 7200-VXR300 or 400 for a good price indeed :-)
No need to send me URLs of ebay, I know where it is :-P I write here
to ask you if you have such a router, not to ask about URLs :-)
what is a good price ... ;-)
F.
___
Pascal Gloor wrote:
what is a good price ... ;-)
A good price is when you are happy to sell and I am happy to buy...
:)
These boxes still go for CHF 6000 + (with NPE-300) according to Ebay,
and I expect you're not willing to pay that much. And since there is no
bankrupcy in sight of a large
Matthias Blaser wrote:
Yeah that's it. In fact, you are very lucky if you see one of these
switches and routers in one of the practice missions... most of the
Informatikpioniere do the same job as the Richtstrahlpioniere.
And if you know how to write TCP/IP you know much more than the ones
who
http://www.ip-plus.net/tools/traceroute_internal_set.en.html
to www.init7.net (hello AS3303? Maybe we should peer?):
1 i79zhh-005-fas3-1.bb.ip-plus.net (164.128.37.1) 0.406 ms 0.239 ms
0.215 ms
2 i79zhb-005-gig14-0.bb.ip-plus.net (138.187.129.14) 0.607 ms 0.494
ms 0.405 ms
3
Steven Glogger wrote:
you might talk to walchli ,-)
I hope the IP Plus technicians will do this ...
F.
___
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Anyone else who cannot reach http://www.admin.ch/ and
http://www.parlament.ch/ (I intended to see the last mile debate)
F.
___
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Michel Renfer wrote:
With or without bdpu filter/guard?
SPT is disabled for that VLAN, we did re-check on this issue after TIX
went down today.
F.
___
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Willy van Gulik wrote:
Being part of a lot of non profit oragnisation (call it in french
association à but non lucratif) that require some
server/web/mail/whatever hosting, I ran into several pain to find
some sponsors for those interests, and the
Dear all,
We are happy to announce that, effective October 1st, 2004, recurring
fees for peering ports will be waived. No more monthly or yearly
charges! Thanks to all SwissIX sponsors!
Please check out the website: http://www.swissix.ch/
If you would like to get connected, please follow this
Good morning,
Fwd from the SIUG discussion list. New important law will be discussed
in the parlament soon.
German: http://www.admin.ch/ch/d/ff/2003/index0_49.html
Francais: http://www.admin.ch/ch/f/ff/2003/index0_49.html
Italiano: http://www.admin.ch/ch/i/ff/2003/index0_49.html
From our
Pascal Gloor wrote:
Thanks to give us the prices :P
while talking about price...
8 mio CHF Tiscali.ch - smart-telecom.ch aka VTX
aka Gemischtwarenladen
SCNR
F.
___
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ladu, Daniele wrote:
As we are not able to start our project, without paying the IFPI
Annual Fee, we need a sponsor, who can help us regarding this
payment.
In fact, it's not that much off-topic, as someone of IFPI is on the
agenda of SwiNOG #9.
Willy van Gulik wrote:
As i can remember, if you are doing some audio streaming online, in
Switzerland, you should be paying a fee that is a % of you total
running budget. But if you are a non profit organisation working only
on donation (hardware, software, human, bandwidth) you don't have a
any
Daniele Guazzoni wrote:
My personal meaning is that mails on swinog are justified as long
they touch themes which affects either the majority of the list or
are somehow correlated to our daily business. Fredy, as maintainer,
correct me if I'm wrong.
What? /me the list-judge? No, Daniele, I'm
Daniel Lorch wrote:
Who maintain the swinog mailing list ?
Please contact me (this is not urgent).
well .. lets see:
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
^
wow, 100 points for the candidate ...
/me is waving to Jerome
aka realsatire ...
F.
---BeginMessage---
System error
error:
Can't use an undefined value as a HASH reference at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/DBIx/Abstract.pm line 783.
context:
...
779:
my $db = $self-clone;
780:
Andre Oppermann wrote:
As well, as a public servant we will choose the laziest way and
are not willing to tune BGP:-)) No, you are right, we have to do
some BGP tuning. But our crew has only BGP knowledge and we have
not a lot of experience with Internet-Routing itself, with all its
tricks.
To cut
Tobias Orlamuende wrote:
Please remember: antispam is a closed mailinglist. You must either
be well-known by the community, or some existing subscriber invites
you to participate.
Good to know. I just subscribed and got approved. Just for my
personal information: What made me well known or which
Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
well was wondering too, but maybe a good feature to prevent to much
and fast mailflow about hot themes like SPF ;-) And at least: a
big thank you for fredy to support the community with the list
We'll check that tomorrow.
Hmmm. I don't really see a 'huge' lag. I see a little
Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
Hmmm. I don't really see a 'huge' lag. I see a little lag, ok. Cursor
(Mailman) needs appx. 30 seconds to send out the mail. And email is
not really realtime, right? We do have faster channels -
irc.swinog.ch
As proposed by Olivier, we changed the mailman cron job
Roger Schmid wrote:
well was wondering too, but maybe a good feature to prevent to much
and fast mailflow about hot themes like SPF ;-) And at least: a big
thank you for fredy to support the community with the list
We'll check that tomorrow.
F.
___
Neil J. McRae wrote:
This reminds me of a first year college database project!
The database design might be not too sophisticated, but the submitted
information should somehow be relevant, shouldn't it? Have a look at
AS8220 peering port speeds ;-)
F.
Guentensperger, Robert wrote:
wow!
65Gig!!!
I want those too? Neil, where could you get them ;-)
F.
___
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Kuster, Christian wrote:
We are working very hard on it, some OSI layer 10 problems to fix ;-)
AKA Teppichetage.
Quoting from a recent SwiNOG message:
Michel Renfer wrote:
Bad things happens, when the carpet floor having their hands on
peering stuff.
Hopefully the situation with IP-Plus will
Daniel Lorch wrote:
If the owner of the domain swinog.ch (only as example) [..]
Just as a sidenote: As per RFC2606 you're encouraged to use
example.net, example.org or example.com in these kind of situations:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2606.txt
As this SPF thing has rather a lot to do with
Steven Glogger wrote:
problems (!!!):
---
there is NO public toilet in the near. so please consider
this before leaving for the BE ,-)
Since some of AS13030 will join too, we might help out with this issue.
Our office is some minutes walk away.
F.
Kuster, Christian wrote:
That's what's in SLA's...
Swisscom donne une valeur indicative de 99,9
valeur indicative = Richtwert
Richtwert is not Garantie
That's how sales and PM's write SLA's which sound good but are worth
nothing...
Others call this 'Best Effort', but cutting service down Friday
Pascal Gloor wrote:
Anyone noticed that the passive interface command is not available for an
OSPF Process running within a VRF ? Solutions? Workarounds? (filtering
multicast is not a solution :-))
PS: I'm talking about IOS, and especially 12.3(6a)
passive interface default ?
Just an idea
F.
Anyone of AS3303 could please confirm and fix it soon?
There is no sign of a trouble report on http://www.ip-plus.net/ (in case
it's reachable) however the traffic graph shows other evidence.
Our statistics show a degradation too (about a 1/5 of the normal traffic
at that time).
Regards,
Fredy
Nik Hug wrote:
look's bad.
I can't reach admin.ch - and this two days before independent day.
Maybe we should ask for a homeland security department? - their first
task might be the deployment of a multihomed internet-link for our
tax-receivers ... but maybe this is a blind spot for a major
Andre Oppermann wrote:
sbb.ch works for me, but have a look at the traceroute ;-)
oh I didn't say it does not work ...
traceroute to www.sbb.ch (193.192.251.7), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 core1.pipeline.ch (62.48.0.1)
2 sl-gw10-zur-2-0.sprintlink.net (80.93.9.13)
3
Pascal Gloor wrote:
At least they confirm it now.
http://www.ip-plus.net/network/current_problems_set.en.html
confirmed once working again ;-)
we want pering!!! ;-P
indeed.
I hope the press will cover the outage and tell the audience what's
wrong with the internet in Switzerland
http://www.sysadminday.com/
Tell your boss to buy you lunch tomorrow!
F.
___
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Dear all,
What about announcing used Cisco and other telco/isp gear on this list?
As far as I recall, it never was decided, only telco/isp related jobs
have been approved. What do you think?
We actually have two PA adapters for sale (PA-2E3, PA-MC-E3, please
contact me offlist in case of
FYI: from nanog list. If this comes true, we gonna have a big mess. It's
worth reading.
F.
Original Message
Subject: Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court says yes!)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:24:27 -0400 (Eastern Standard Time)
From: Alex Rubenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear all,
we have created a separate Anti Spam list.
http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/antispam
This list is intended for technical, political and law issues concerning
spam in Switzerland. It's a closed mailing list, and it's (primarily)
intended for technical employees of ISP's,
Alexander Koch wrote:
wondering how much longer public exchanges will stay for
networks like L3, Telia, Tiscali... and becoming offtopic g
Could you say anything further about this? What is Tiscali doing these
days? Already pulling the plug from public exchanges and establishing
private
Arnold Nipper wrote:
Hmmm... you sound like one of the many customers the ISP techie
subscribers of this list have... WHAT is the problem???
Too tired? It's obvious that www.bluewin.ch doesn't get resolved ...
Poor DNS admin. Tomorrow morning 8:30, Zurich Escher-Wyss Platz, Bluewin
Tower:
Dear all,
Please reserve Wednesday, Sept. 29th, 2004 for our fabulous SwiNOG
meeting. Location: again Tramdepot Bern is forseen, we are currently
checking that. No registration link yet, will be available later.
As Pascal already posted, please submit proposals for presentations now
to [EMAIL
Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
For some ugly reason, Mailman hit us very hard. Due an unfortunate
bounce setting of Mailman, almost all addresses had been automatically
set to 'no mail'. This happend a few days ago, and therefore the list
had been very quiet.
Some of you might get every mail twice
Dear all,
I thought I know now almost everything about the BGP route selection
process. But obviously not yet?!
example:
sh ip bgp regexp _3320_ (next hop addrs removed)
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
* i81.201.32.0/20 x.x.x.x 90 50 0 702 3320 ?
*i
Sorry for beeing OT, but I think this is rather remarkable.
I got more than a dozen of Fürst-alike spam mails within the last hour
or so, recently advertising the remaining SWISSAIR junk.
The subject is as it was, the mailheader also look-alike, but the body
looks like a virus, however there is
Andre Oppermann wrote:
I would very much prefer if you or anyone else would keep this SPAM
reports to the newsgroups ch.admin to keep the level of useless junk
at least here down.
Ist there a need for spam / abuse / postmaster list? I agree with Andre
that abuse / uce issues should not be
Steven Glogger wrote:
as i can remember myself there existed a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailinglist which was kind of frequented. once fürstli wrote a
comment on that list, since then the mailinglist ist quite empty. i
think we two are both 'paten' for 'new' applicats, not? or is that
list now dead?
Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
Likewise we see IP transit pricing going down to 20% of the price of
three years ago, however IX ports are still on the same rate or even
more expensive. Therefore being member of TIX for instance does not
value any longer unless small ISP can handle at least 5 MBps over
Kurt A. Schumacher wrote:
A good abuse policy must include a reaction time of a maximum of 15
minutes @ 24 hours and 366 days a year. And this must include
blocking abused connection in this time.
Unfortunately no ISP can afford this.
F.
--
[EMAIL
Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
we would like to MD5 too ...
There is an interesting discussion going on regarding the MD5 hype on
the NYIIX mailing list, where, I guess, most of you don't have access
to. It explains much about current BGP hole, which is about to be
announced in a few days.
quoted from
Andre Oppermann wrote:
Is it a problem in BGP standard itself or a problem of the currently
available implementations from the vendors? What is the effect of
the hole, will it make sessions flap or does it allow to inject bogus
routing information into BGP?
Noone obviously seems to know yet,
Hi all,
we would like to MD5 too, as most of you. Could those, which maintain a
peering with us Init Seven (AS13030, 194.42.48.16), contact me offlist,
preferably in the Swinog IRC (irc.mgz.ch, #swinog, look for rapido-AS13030).
Thanks,
Fredy
P.S. zebra / quagga does not support MD5 without
Steven Glogger wrote:
you might talk to ms. beranek (layer of switch).
Which switch layer? Didn't know that Switch works like the OSI model ;-P
I guess Mrs Lawyer Beranek is somewhere in layer 6 or 7 *g*
F.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
Sandro Bertschinger wrote:
Yeap, here too, only addresses from switch database.
/me 2.
I checked the list, noone from exigo here. I sent an abuse report also
to their upstream ip-plus.
F.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
Hi all,
I was browsing the list archive
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/index.html
and noticed that older messages are gone, which, IMHO, is a loss of
knowhow. More than once I could retreive important info since it was
once discussed on the list.
I checked the FAQ of
Andre Oppermann wrote:
Hints? Suggestions?
Try this:
router bgp bla
no bgp enforce-first-as
...
Works!
More beer! ;-)
I owe you one, Andre!
Thanks,
F.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Andre Oppermann wrote:
1. CIXP is owned and run by CERN, *not* Telehouse Geneva (Hi Paolo!).
2. Telehouse Geneva is just a place where the second CIXP switch is
located.
3. Why and how would you 'merge' two Internet Exchanges in different
cities which are more than a couple of kilometers away
Nicolas wrote:
If you get spam from them just blackhole the /19 in your MTA. There
is nice spam filters ;) For the de-peer i think it's up to any
compagny. You can't tell people to de-peer just because you get some
garbage from these guys.
Fair enough. Every company has to decide themselves. But I
Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
According to Netlantis, a direct peering over TIX is maintained of:
AS4589, AS6772, AS8758, AS8833, AS12347, AS12350, AS15623, AS16215,
AS16221, AS20932, AS21232, AS24951.
Please shutdown peering with Backbone Solutions. They have been
warned and promised not to spam again
Daniel Lorch wrote:
I'm interested in why de-peering is seen as an appropriate response
to the spamming issue. What is the desired result? What relief
does this bring to the victims of the spam? Or is this only used
as a way to censure the offending network?
Help me determine why I should
Viktor Steinmann wrote:
Sorry, but why should anybody opt-out from a list, he didn't choose
to opt-in in the frist place.
That's the usual stuff you hear from spammers along with...
...*it was a mistake from one of our employees
...we didn't know, that this is considered offensive
...it's not
Dear all,
I was editing the memberlist, and noticed that SwiNOG is growing and
growing: we have 447 subscribed addresses - meaning, according to our
charter, we have 447 members.
Subscription to the mailing list constitutes 'membership' of SwiNOG.
I guess, SwiNOG is the biggest institution of
Pascal Gloor wrote:
meaning, according to our charter, we have 447 members. I guess,
SwiNOG is the biggest institution of the telecommunications
industry in Switzerland.
Phil! See the mess you've done in switzerland :-P
I suggest we vote Phil for 'Ehrenpräsident'
F.
Dear all,
Again, Backbone Solutions AG is spamming again. See below.
Please consider to shutdown peering. This is simply not a behaviour of a
serious ISP.
Regards,
Fredy
From - Fri Mar 26 17:50:39 2004
X-UIDL: _;0!:eD!![1a!9X!
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2:
Return-Path:
Steven Glogger wrote:
Please consider to shutdown peering. This is simply not a behaviour
of a serious ISP.
now, it's enough.
ps: now he's on a perm blacklist ...
Good.
According to Netlantis, a direct peering over TIX is maintained of:
AS4589, AS6772, AS8758, AS8833, AS12347, AS12350, AS15623,
Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
Also please apply a filter to the session of the TIX route server,
otherwise traffic is still routed over TIX.
!
ip as-path access-list 9 deny ^13250_
ip as-path access-list 9 permit .*
!
router bgp xx
neighbor 194.42.48.126 filter-list 9 in
!
And make sure to do
rudolphi wrote:
bad boys :-) today in Zürichsee-Zeitung: ein fehler sprach hacker
an - [...] unglücklicherweise hat sich dabei ein fehler
eingeschlichen: IP-adressen von anwendern, die den test durchgeführt
hatten, konnten eingesehen werden. unter servicdeprovidern wurde
dieses manko in der nacht
Olivier Mueller wrote:
Maybe we (Swinog) should write a Leserbrief.
How many people read the Zürichsee-Zeitung ? :-)
AFAIK it's #3 or #4 in canton of Zurich. I guess they to 50'000 copies
a day.
http://www.zsz.ch/
F.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z.Hd. Redaktion Zürichsee-Zeitung
Leserbrief zum Artikel: Ein Fehler sprach Hacker an vom 5. März 2004
Die SwiNOG Swiss Network Operators Group wehrt sich dagegen, als
Hacker bezeichnet zu werden. SwiNOG (www.swinog.ch) ist eine
informelle Gruppe von Technikern praktisch aller Internetprovider
John Morgan Salomon wrote:
/me wonders how long some cretin from the Blick will start screaming
how ISPs should be held legally responsible for end-customer
workstation security.
/me does not want to consider rewriting AGB and service contracts :-(
F.
Viktor Steinmann wrote:
No offense, but isn't LambdaNet the company that has gone broke last
week? (Insolvenz)
Yes. According to de.comm.internet.infrastruktur they will survive, at
least for a while:
Siehe Lambdanet-Pressemitteilung:
2Gestern, am 19.02.2004, bestätigte der vorläufige
Olivier M. wrote:
http://www.reisen.ch/idn/ sorry, currently only german. But
interesting topic.
And here the statement from Switch from yesterday about this issue
(see below). I guess three will be many people online on 1st March at
midnight... (including myself: of course I _need_ müller.ch :)
Roman Hochuli wrote:
I have an uptime of something over 3 days a the moment. Anyway I am
missing ~300 prefixes from the routeserver since that time.
May there be some guys who have to clear their bgp-sessions...?
I remember I had to clear our session to .126 recently due reaching the
max-prefix.
Roger Buchwalder wrote:
194.42.48.126 4 8235 223301 141366 0 0 0 3d21h Idle (PfxCt)
you need to 'clear ip bgp 194.42.48.126' on your end
F.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fabian Wenk wrote:
http://www.reisen.ch/idn/
sorry, currently only german. But interesting topic.
I'm wondering anyway if the umlaut domains in real life will work.
I'm not (yet) in the technical stuff. But have a look at Switch's
description:
http://www.switch.ch/id/idn/
F.
http://www.reisen.ch/idn/
sorry, currently only german. But interesting topic.
F.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Dear all,
SwissIX has recently the 2nd site at IXEurope established and is now
ready for new peerings. We would like to welcome all of you as new members.
http://www.swissix.ch/
Current members are: Aspectra, Dolphins, Genotec, Hostpoint, Init Seven,
Lie-Comtel, Metanet, Nine Internet
Marcel Stutz wrote:
quick question witch is the best body/chassie of a Cisco Router to
use 2 x GigaBit Ethernet and 4 x FastEthernet ?
Have a look at Cisco 7301, 3x GigE, you can go with dot1Q to get 4x
FastEthernet.
HTH
F.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interesting study in the latest RIPE Newsletter:
http://www.ripe.net/newsletter/2003/newsletter3.pdf
Well, before running out of IPv4 space, I see two things coming earlier:
- lack of AS numbers
- unix timestamp will AFAIK exceed 32 bits in year 2038
F.
BTW: I'd be retiered 2033 ;-)
Is really noone here from Telesonique? Their dialup is abused for the
2nd time within a week!
Case has been escalated to UUnet (Transit).
F.
Original Message
From - Wed Dec 03 08:22:29 2003
X-UIDL: )9R!!d0h!DQe!!jQp!
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2:
Michel Renfer wrote:
The topic Spam sent over infected or malconfigured enduser pc's
will become an big issue. We saw Virus' sending Spam directly from
the users pc, downloading the recipient list and the payload trough
HTTP from the web.
ACK.
How will you deal with the problem, that one user can
Roger Buchwalder wrote:
what do you think about this?
got someone else those spams?
We had this topic recently here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/msg02086.html
I guess best policy is ignoring.
F.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
Erich Hohermuth wrote:
If someone likes to work next to me, please have a look at
http://www.solnet.ch/kontakt/jobs/.
Business is booming, good. May I suggest that you make a note 'we only
accept applications by email' - I read recently an article at
Tages-Anzeiger where they wrote a story about
Marcel Prisi wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: host smtp.urbanet.ch[195.202.193.135] said: 553
sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1)
Whoops ... could someone at Urbanet check ?
Too bad, list members @ urbanet don't get any Swinog mails currently:
- The following
Dear all
since TIX is not maintaining a mailinglist (hint hint) and Swinog is
kind of substitution, I suggest to setup a separate BGP announcment
list. I guess 80% of this list are not interested in messages like
'AS9 is announcing new prefixes: 288.277.266.0/19 at TIX and CIXP,
please
Pascal Gloor wrote:
I dont think this is really our problem. IXEurope should have a list.
Nah?
ACK, but they don't seem to be able. As the person who should be in
charge sits somewhere in the U.K., noone of the community has ever met
him (except probably Andre as former IXEurope employee). Ever
Fabian Uebersax wrote:
Anyone else receiving unwanted snailmail by green.ch?
Jep, received the green stuff too. I already received some unwanted
snailmail from them 2 years ago, but since then I moved and last week
I received this stuff on my new address. As I don't have any customer
relation with
Pascal Gloor wrote:
I think the community would like to have an answer from green.ch
I suggest that green.ch people on this list forward this expectation to
their CEO.
and a reaction from Switch...
Should already have reached Mrs. Attorney Switch.
Further reading:
Roger Buchwalder wrote:
we do have some problems with 3 peers.
they won't come up if i clear bgp .
somebody got the same status?
194.42.48.524 15398 91037 91078000 1d12hActive
I guess Werft22 is finally dead.
194.42.48.674 1257 65469 6216000
Dear all
at de.comm.internet.infrastruktur is a thread about faulty Cisco
switches. In the actual C't, page 10, you see a referring picture.
A quick check of some of our switches shows that obviously one of them
is also affected.
Please have a look at
Pascal Gloor wrote:
- Fabien Berger, Michel Renfer, Fredy Kunzler, for the meeting
organisation.
Forgot Pascal Gloor!
- Simon Leinen, Dr. Mike Widmer, Raphael Colliard, Eva Bollman, André
Chapuis and Nicolas Fischbach for their GREAT presentations !
Forgot Pascal Gloor!
I hope I didnt forgot
Roman Hochuli wrote:
I do not think they have a clue what they are talking about...
Some others neither, I guess. What about 50 GByte / Mt including 1HE
Rackserver for CHF 99? W/o hardware CHF 77. Kind of trashware they're
using. Located in Zurich, I forgot to mention.
Rough calculation the
Rickli Remo wrote:
I assume you mean PSI.net not us?
Don't know. Isn't PSI.net, PSIEurope and PSI Switzerland the same?
I'd like to get in contact with someone with authority who is in charge
of die IP address 154.15.53.245. Read: not an automated ticket system
responder.
Received: from
Hi PSI people
Could anyone from PSI and/or Orange *with authority* to block certain
dial-in numbers of the Orange anonymous dialin contact me offlist please?
F.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Roger Schmid wrote:
i hope somebody from sSwitcht is a member of this list,
at least noone from mhs is on this list. Anyone in contact to them?
Maybe they should be pointed to this thread - they might have an
explanation.
F.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matthias Hertzog wrote:
I'm now an official member of this mailing list.
Welcome to SwiNOG! Hope you already made a mark in your agenda:
http://www.swinog.ch/meetings/swinog7/index.asp ...
But first things first...
[snip]
I hope to have pointed everything out. For additional questions,
please
Alexander Koch wrote:
[snip]
If I am not utterly mistaken whether a personal copy is
allowed or not is not taken into account when this personal
copy is actively offered through a p2p network. At the point
any copy is offered it's automatically not a personal copy
any longer...
Good point, but I
ueli heuer wrote:
Manuel Wenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are all too generous with these people. That's a complete waste
of time. A notice of claimed infringement from the United States
has no legal value whatsoever in Switzerland. We receive tons of
these emails everyday. I personally
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
