Re: [swinog] Army Service

2004-11-01 Thread Nik Hug
 Is it really the job of the army to teach TCP/IP? Oh shit, where is our
 tax money going :-(

O/T but I can't resist ...

is it really the job of the army to protect some embassy using qualified
people? (most of them making a job making more or less sense)

is it really the job of the army to protect some private reunions like WEF
using qualified  (you know the rest)

is it really the job of the army to clean streets/forest what-ever after a
landslide usinq qualified ... (you know the rest)

is it really the job of the army to use recon drones to spot pot-smokers in
the vicinity of zuerich ...

no it's not!

but where else can boys (and also some strange girls) play these day with
expensive but useless tools?

greetings

nik

___
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] Bluewin Fixnet merge! // Unbundling...

2004-10-31 Thread Nik Hug
Hello

From: mark walliser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[..]
 in the future, while the ones living in ober-hinter-irgenwas-dingen
(1000
 citizens)
 will have high-priced-SC-only-offers...

that may be - but on the other side living there has also some good thing's
... you don't pay that much for your flat - krankenkassen are often much
cheaper than in a urban region and so on.

In the whole discussion about public service this fact is very often
forgotten (maybe somebody should explain this to ex-monsieur-prix Marti). It
would be interesting to have a general consumer index for different regions
of our country. As a downtown-telco-user I can't hardly unterstandy why
Sepp on his Alm should get the same ADSL oder Fiber or WLL or [put your
favourite last mile technoloy in] service for the same price than me. Why
should I cross-subside his broadband-access as long as Sepp doensn't help me
to pay the rent for my appartment? At a certain point there comes an end to
freundeigenössicher Solidarität.


just my 2c.

Nik (coming from the cold mountains of the bernese oberland - a region
mostly owned by SC.)

___
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] [Fwd: [SIUG-discuss] FMG-Revision in der Herbstsession]

2004-09-13 Thread Nik Hug


 well, ok, lets have a demonstration sesson on the 29th :-) i'm sure we
will
 get around 100 ppl to demonstrate ,-)
 everybody not demonstrating will not have the right to participate the
 social event ,-)

why not change the medium of the new famous Bundesplatz-Jumping Well?
Instead of ordinary water 26 different sorts of beer ... (SH= Falkenbier,
VD=Boxer, BE=Egger, AG=Müllerbräu ...

We can get drunken and demonstrate the same time!

so long

nik

___
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] IP Phones INOC DBA

2004-08-30 Thread Nik Hug
From: Kuster, Christian


-Got no phones
-Got invoice !!
-Got no code
-Got no voice

got no phones
got no invoice
got no code
got no voice
but then after some emails at least an answer from cisco ...

greetings

nik



___
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] AS3303 Routing Problem ?

2004-07-30 Thread Nik Hug
From: Andre Oppermann

 You know what?  I think the DBA proxy server in the basement of the
Bundeshaus
 broke down!

but time.ethz.ch is still up - so all LI-Servers are still in sync out there
... all emails for Rorschacher and friend are waiting nicely queued up at
provider side. Bad luck for osama.

nik


___
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] dns issue at bluewin ?

2004-06-02 Thread Nik Hug
 Poor DNS admin. Tomorrow morning 8:30, Zurich Escher-Wyss Platz, Bluewin
 Tower: Sysadmin-Bashing. Will the press be there?

couple of minutes ago I saw a shadow moving through berne   maybe a
hostmaster heading south for a safe place?
But I think the loetschberg-route was the wrong decision - high-water around
thun! But maybe he coundn't check the last weather forecast on his favourite
website?

greetz
nik



___
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] FW: Kassensturz

2004-03-02 Thread Nik Hug
 golden times ahead .. i thinking more and more about my future will
 be on a farm and taking care of cow's and sheep's

do you already take applications for cropdusters or so? I think sooner or
later I need a healthier job than this.

Greetings

Nik

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/


Re: [swinog] Minor Earthquake in western switzerland at 18.32 MET

2004-02-23 Thread Nik Hug



 we also noticed it in Biel/Bienne

and www.seismo.ethz.ch is some sort of a collateral damage  it takes
very long to load at the moment.

greetings

nik


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/


Re: [swinog] Problems with Cablecom MX

2004-01-21 Thread Nik Hug
Hello

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 This is the braindamaged Cablecom Antispam configuration. If you make
 to many connections to them during a certain amount of time they
 automatically add a firewall rule to their ipfilter on mx.cablecom.ch.

 We've run into this problem at least two times last year.

 Of course they don't remove it automatically, you have to reach their
 mailadmin to do so, which isn't quite easy. And well of course,
 if you reach the guy, he just won't understand why his setup
 is all crap.

yes this sounds familiar to me! Some week's ago we had troubles to reach
mx.hispeed.ch and after some barking we got a short because of spam from
your servers as answer from cablecom.
(but without proof of a spam report at all! Sure we make this very hidden
abuse@ entry at RIPE just for our pleasure - like all of you I guess ;-)
Just being blocked by ugly iprules is always much better than a clear
spam-report.

And it seemed like the whole range (different /24's) was blocked  (not
only the ip's of our mx's)

Greetings

Nik

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/


Re: [swinog] Why bothering about IPv6? IPv4 will last until 2047 ... says RIPE ;-)

2003-12-11 Thread Nik Hug
 BTW: I'd be retiered 2033 ;-)

are you sure?
according CouchepinBlocherMerz 2038 may be still too early for you!

greetings

nik
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/


Re: [swinog] BE also in Berne???

2003-10-30 Thread Nik Hug

 Zurich has a BE, Geneva is planning a BE... why not a BE also in Berne?

 Feedback is very welcome :o)


BE^2 sounds good  ;-)

Locations ... Dramdepot? Federal? (Egger bier!), Glaskasten auf grosser
Schanze? Gut Gelaunt @Loebeggä? ...

greetings nik

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/


Re: [swinog] BE also in Berne???

2003-10-30 Thread Nik Hug
Dramdepot
^
it's not that dramatic there
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/


Re: [swinog] Mailempfang wegen SPAM blockiert / Mail receipt because of Spam blocks

2003-10-29 Thread Nik Hug
Hi Mike

 It remains after-noticing again that there (still) is NO legal obligation
 for Provider to prevent Spam.

well but there is also no legal obligation to accept emails from anyone.
It's our lone decision and within our duty g as a postmaster.

 A closing from whole IP rank for Mailverkehr consider I against it totally
 unfit. I doubt even that such measures are right. In any case ones stand
it
 in a glaring contrast to the thought of the free InterNet, because so
some
 innocent InterNet user are punished. And this possibly equal several
times
 - once by a possibly received Spam, then by the blockade of sending,
whereby
 most user due to the error message and call then on a most liable to pay
the
 costs Hotline do not even have to know the reason.

poor customers you have :-(
According Sheriff Bush and his friends I call this an collateral damage
fighting the axis of evil spamers.
Maybe you should better use your time for a state of the art abuse handling?
At least as far as I remember there have been a lot of complains during the
last few month about your company handling (or better not-handling)
spam-reports.
As a provider you can never avoid spam-actions originating from some bad
customers within your network - but you can weaken the consequences with a
sound abuse-desk.

Greetings

nik

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/


Re: [swinog] Mailempfang wegen SPAM blockiert / Mail receiptbecause of Spam blocks

2003-10-29 Thread Nik Hug
 And, you don't have to look for another working SMTP server, when you're
 travelling around with your notebook. Lots of SMTP servers, for example
 mail.bluewin.ch, can only be accessed within their own ip ranges.

there are a lot of email providers with SMTP-AUTH and/or SMTP-after-POP
around. Not to forget all the nice webmail-interfaces ;-)

greetings

nik


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/


Re: [swinog] Domain grabbing: nextra.ch

2003-10-02 Thread Nik Hug
 Since I got bounces from @nextra.ch, I thought of checking this domain
 at nic.ch, and surprise surprise:

 http://www.switch.ch/id/search-domain.html?dom_id=nextra.ch


A customer (had a hosting contract with nextra for his domain) told me some
week ago that mhs changed his switch password without any notice nor
permission. The dns-change wasn't made with a sammelantrag from switch. As
I saw, mhs made a reqeust to get a lost password for this domain at switch
and then grabbed the switch mail from the customers inbox   not very
nice from my point of view.

greetings

nik




--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/


Re: [swinog] Domain grabbing: nextra.ch

2003-10-02 Thread Nik Hug
Hi Matthias,

I will forward your message to this customer - maybe you can clear this
direct with him. As far as I know he's on vacation at the moment and he has
nothing to do with wine or so  maybe there was a second case? ... Anyway
(the reason why this answer sent via swinog):
I think grabbing switch-passwords from a customers inbox or mail-queue is
never good practics under any circumstances.
Switch has a good support-desk with very helpful people and we always got
transparent solutions on this way  - also in urgent cases.

greetings

nh


- Original Message - 
From: Matthias Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 12:27 AM
Subject: Re: [swinog] Domain grabbing: nextra.ch


 Hello Nik!

 I cannot remember the domain name at the moment, but we had a very unlucky
 case during the migration of the nextra services. I can clearly remember
 that case because of the very rude language used by the ex-nextra
customer.
 I think, it was wine dealer or something like that.

 We've informed all ex nextra customers about the planned shutdown of the
old
 infrastructure. This happened ONE YEAR after all customers have been
 gekündigt by T-Systems. In the case metioned above, a person from the
 company mailed to me: plesae do everything you can to avoid a service
 interruption. Unfortunatly, the person had no passwords for the domain,
but
 i was able to clearly identify him to be in position to give such orders.

 To prevent mail losses, we've ordered the nic.ch password and grabbed it
 in our inbound mailserver queue before it got bounced due to unkonwn
user.
 Afterwards, we've changed the TEC-C and modified the DNS after
transferring
 the zonefiles to dns1.mhs.ch and dns2.mhs.ch.

 After this, another person of the same company changed the switch data to
 the old nextra servers. I've changed back and so on. I wanted to prevent
any
 mail losses, changed the password at switch and infromed ALL involved
 persons by mail. Noone replied, even after re-sending my mails a few
times.

 Some time after, one of the two persons sent me a mail with informations,
 how he want to arrange his hosting. Minutes later, i've sent the new
switch
 password to that person. Since that, i've heard nothing from that company.

 mhs did NEVER changed the holder informations of a customers domain. One
can
 say, that grabbing the password was illegal. I would not disagree in
normal
 cases. In this case, i was acting on behalf of the customer, so, for me,
 that's okay. Maybe some lawyers in here can give more informations on
that.

 However, mhs did NOT:

 - stolen the domain nextra.ch
 - stolen any domain of any ex-nextra customer.

 Best wishes,
 Matthias

 BTW: Nextra (Schweiz) AG made the mistake to register some domains for
 customers as Holder=Nextra instead of Holder=Customer. We've figured that
 out, assured correct payment of the domains and requested several holder
 changes to the real holder. (Holder=Customer). I think, this fair and
 correct, the customers loved that service from mhs. Some of them
subscribed
 for hosting services from our company, some of them did not. All's well
with
 that.

 M.H.


 M.H.
 - Original Message - 
 From: Nik Hug [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 1:17 PM
 Subject: Re: [swinog] Domain grabbing: nextra.ch


   Since I got bounces from @nextra.ch, I thought of checking this domain
   at nic.ch, and surprise surprise:
  
   http://www.switch.ch/id/search-domain.html?dom_id=nextra.ch
  
 
  A customer (had a hosting contract with nextra for his domain) told me
 some
  week ago that mhs changed his switch password without any notice nor
  permission. The dns-change wasn't made with a sammelantrag from
switch.
 As
  I saw, mhs made a reqeust to get a lost password for this domain at
 switch
  and then grabbed the switch mail from the customers inbox   not very
  nice from my point of view.
 
  greetings
 
  nik
 
 
 
 
  --
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
 
 
 


 --
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/


Re: [swinog] FYI [from nanog] use of DNS wildcards in TLD

2003-09-16 Thread Nik Hug

- Original Message - 
From: Fredy Kuenzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[..]
 I'm gonna register *.ch and *.li now. Some extra traffic is rather nice
 (a lot of $$$banners and $$$popups), isn't it?

*.ch for Fredy is fine with me - and *.com and *.net for versign also. 
Because I will take .*  

nik




--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/


[swinog] enjoy!

2003-07-24 Thread Nik Hug
today it's sysadmin day!

hope a lot of our users know about http://www.sysadminday.com g

greetings

nik
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/


Re: [swinog] Upgrade Main Power Supply

2003-07-14 Thread Nik Hug

From: Ueli Heuer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 why is this generator not jet connected?

 does anybody have an idee about that issue?

maybe the power-feed goes according IEEE 802.11P? (the upcoming standard for
Wireless Power?) -
the space between the generator and the building becomes then a real
hot-spot when the tesla coil is working.

greetz

nik

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/


Re: [swinog] TIX

2003-07-01 Thread Nik Hug

 Andre Oppermann wrote:
[..]
 Here is what happend to the building power feed. At around 17:30
 one fuse breaker at the EWZ building entrace cabinet triggered and
 took out phase 2. It took quite some time to figure that one out
 because that EWZ cabinet is locked and only EWZ has the key to it.
 So the guys from IXEurope called EWZ. Finally they arrived but didn't
 have a proper replacement fuse (400A). 
[..]

Question: The Power Generator isn't operating behind this main fuse?
Or was the poor diesel-engine this week on vacation?

greetz

nik
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/


Re: AW: [swinog] Black Sheep Swiss ISP: Backbone Solutions (was: Backbone PRO)

2003-04-04 Thread Nik Hug

 Are there other people on this list, which have been spammed by them? If
it's
 only Fredy, then I'm not sure, if we can really call it spam. If it is
spam,
 I will gladly stop peering with them...

got it also - but I think they have my contact address from my business card
I gave to them some years ago (well at least not from twixtel or so ;-)

nik

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/


Re: [swinog] Entries on abuse.net

2003-04-03 Thread Nik Hug
Hello

From: Felix Rauch
 A member of SIUG noted that many swiss providers do not have an entry
 in the contact database of abuse.net. We think it would be good if the
 swiss providers represented on this list could update their entries to
 provide the e-mail address of their abuse-contacts to abuse.net.

doesn't make much sense to me - why an additional db with abuse-addresses?
Ripe  friends seems sufficient to me. Instead of some privat directories
I would prefer to have always udated whois-data  
We have already an anoying orbl-pluralism out there - do we need this also
in the field of abuse-addresses?

Greetings

Nik



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/


Re: [swinog] Provider Class Backbone Routers

2003-02-14 Thread Nik Hug

From: Pascal Gloor [..]
 why not, but how will you garantee that someone doesnt vote 10 times using
 10 different email addresses subscribed to the mailing list?
[..]

oh that's quite easy: everyone has to use palladium on a fritz-chip equiped
thinkpad :-(

n!k

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/