[swinog] E-Mail Address has changed

Guten Tag Diese Mailbox ist nicht mehr gltig. Ihr Mail wird an [EMAIL PROTECTED] weitergeleitet. Bitte kontaktieren sie fr geschftliche Angelegenheiten, die nicht so lange warten knnen entweder Herrn Steven Glogger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) oder [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mit freundlichen Grssen easynet AG

Re: [swinog] Experiences with Foundry Bigiron-gear

BigIron is a Switch - not a router... O.k. - maybe Foundry says, it's a router. But when you try to do some advanced routing on that box - forget it... That's my experience with those things - you might hear other... Cheers, Viktor On Mittwoch 01 Dezember 2004 12.05, Gunther Stammwitz wrote:

Re: [swinog] TIX problems ?

No problems here - everything normal... On Dienstag 30 November 2004 15.40, Jerome Tissieres wrote: Hello all, Did some of you had problems/strange things at TIX today at 3:30 PM ? We lost some peers on the public IX and a card on another router crashed exactly at the same time... Thanks,

Re: [swinog] FOTD -- Fun of the day

According to the whois entry, they are located in Utah, which has 8 hours of time difference to Switzerland... So they'll probably notice it in 1-2 hours... :-) Cheers, Viktor On Montag 29 November 2004 14.35, Stefan Rothenbühler wrote: Hacked by realloc ;) Thats nice. But they didn't notice

Re: [swinog] New meaning of Networking

This happens, when a techie explains something to his manager, the manager explains it to sales, sales to marketing and marketing does the default-answers for the support-team... :-) SCNR ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [swinog] New meaning of Networking

worldwide. According to Econophone's Support you can even attach two devices at the same time so both phones will ring if someone calls your number. Whoever picks up the phone first gets the call. Is that the same Support that wrote the other answer? ah - allright... never mind... *g*

Re: [swinog] looking for a 7200VXR300/400

Since Swisscom is replacing all Ciscos in the BBCS backbone with Junipers, maybe they'll have to sell some used Ciscos soon? Does anybody know, what they are doing with the old stuff? Just because it's too weak/small/old for Swisscom, doesn't mean it's crap... On Donnerstag 18 November 2004

Re: [swinog] ITU wants to clog routers

Interesting It's clear, that the NRO doesn't like the idea... but it would definitely solve many problems, if IP space was assigned per country... (yes, I know, that the RIRs would still exist, but let's assume, that ALL IP-Space would only be assigned by countries) - Webshops who may not

[swinog] Steinmann V2.0 here

Hi all My wife and I are happy to announce that our daughter Anna Sophie was born yesterday (tuesday, 19.10) at 14:15 - or in binary form: 1 + 1 = 11 :-) Pics and more will follow this weekend on www.stony.com. Cheers, Viktor ___ swinog mailing list

Re: [swinog] TIX Problem?

Sorry - not really a flap, if it lasts for 40 minutes, huh ;-) On Donnerstag 30 September 2004 14.09, Viktor Steinmann wrote: We see the flap too... On Donnerstag 30 September 2004 14.06, Pascal Gloor wrote: We lost 6 peers about 30 minutes ago. Others seems to have the same. What's

Re: [swinog] TIX Problem?

Lost peers are: 8404, 13030, 6805, 8327, 21232, 24889 Or cleartext: Cablecom, Init7, Telefonica, Deckpoint, GGA Maur, Monzoon Strange combination, isn't it ... On Donnerstag 30 September 2004 14.20, Michel Renfer wrote: Hi André No. At least not on the Foundry Switch. Maybe you have a

Re: [swinog] SwissIX announces free peering ports

Very cool, Fredy Looking forward to price reduction @ TIX :-) Viktor On Donnerstag 16 September 2004 22.03, Fredy Kuenzler wrote: Dear all, We are happy to announce that, effective October 1st, 2004, recurring fees for peering ports will be waived. No more monthly or yearly charges! Thanks

Re: [swinog] Reply-to: header [was: Re: WAN link provider]

Agree with Daniel. When replying on a mailing-list, I know, that my answer goes to the list. Don't change that. Viktor On Montag 13 September 2004 23.01, Daniel Lorch wrote: Hi It only generates confusion and embarrassment, and I think we should be able to rely on people being able to

Re: [swinog] DNS black listing

We don't use it, but I guess it makes sense against DOS attacks on UDP protocols. By blocking unassigned IP Blocks on the border of your network, you can at least prevent some of the DOS traffic Cheers, Viktor On Freitag 10 September 2004 09.04, Frédéric jachiet wrote: Hi all, Does

Re: [swinog] REQUEST: Off topic

Usually providers will sponsor bandwidth and/or rackspace - but not money (except the big players). But if somebody should really look into this request, then I think it would be a good idea to state the approximate amount, that an ISP would have to invest in this. Regards, Viktor On Wed, 1

Re: [swinog] Telco IT Afterwork Party

I received that invitation by unsolicited mail and ergo it was considered as spam. Don't know, if anybody wants to join an afterwork party organized by spammers... On Mittwoch, 25. August 2004 10.37, Alexis Caceda wrote: Already heard about that? (Sorry for the German) Morgen Mittwoch

Re: [swinog] geek count + 1

Whow! Congratulations - all the best to you and your family! Viktor At 01:19 15.08.2004, you wrote: Was supposed to be a girl, but ROOT decided something else for us. On friday the 13th of August I became a daddy! pics 'n' stuff on http://www.spale.com/esteban/ ;-) Pascal

Re: [swinog] bandwidth limitation

Every decent Cisco router with a recent IOS is capable of this... E.g. a 3640 or so... Cheers, Viktor On Donnerstag, 5. August 2004 17.31, Gabriel Boissonnard wrote: Hello, Let's say we have IP transit from a provider, and would like to split it between several customers. Number of customer

[swinog] Swisscom's Money-Making Machine

, and then let someone pay you to fix it in useful time. Thanks for your attention, Viktor -- Viktor Steinmann - System and Network Engineer Easynet AG, Hardturmstrasse 135, 8005 Zuerich, Switzerland Phone: +41 1 560 32 00, Fax: +41 1 560 32 01 ___ swinog

Re: [swinog] Swisscom's Money-Making Machine

On Dienstag, 3. August 2004 15.00, Stanislav Sinyagin wrote: You haven't still answered my question: according to the contract terms, what's Swisscom's commitment to fix the service that is broken on Friday afternoon? The standard SLA says, that Swisscom only fixes problems during workhours.

[swinog] Congratulations to DE-CIX

(german only, sorry) http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/47909 20 GBit/s going through DE-CIX - I think that's somehow like a birthday. Therefore: CONGRATULATIONS ...and thanks for helping make the internet faster ;-) Viktor -- Viktor Steinmann - System and Network Engineer Easynet AG

Re: separate Spam List? (was: Re: [swinog] Hegi is spamming over spamcom)

/me raises his hand We all know, that Spam is bad. But handling our abuse-box is already enough for most of us on the list - no need to share that experience every time it occurs... Cheers, Viktor On Freitag, 30. April 2004 16.12, Fredy Kuenzler wrote: Andre Oppermann wrote: I would very

Re: [swinog] ns1.ip-plus.net

I don't think, that the bandwith aspect is even worth mentioning... at least my NetFlow Statistics say so... I guess, this protection of their DNS servers is not done because of bandwidth but because of security concerns (as many others before me already mentioned here). Cheers, Viktor On

Re: [swinog] MD5 Hype

Same here all I hear when asking some people who *know* what's going on give more or less an answer sounding like: I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you... Cheers, Viktor On Montag, 19. April 2004 11.37, Alexander Bochmann wrote: Hi, ...on Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 11:21:24AM

Re: [swinog] Phonecall: Spam from Baertsch Buerobedarf

Humm... the business-model of these guys is just great: - Spam like hell and make e-mail communication obsolete - People start using paper and copiers again for their correspondence - They sell even more office supplies ...or maybe NOT! SCNR, Viktor On Donnerstag, 15. April 2004 10.05,

Re: [swinog] Lambdanet ready to peer @TIX

No offense, but isn't LambdaNet the company that has gone broke last week? (Insolvenz) Cheers, Viktor On Monday 23 February 2004 15:22, Peering-Tech wrote: Dear TIX members, Lambdanet have just connected to the TIX. We have published our peering details and requirements at

Re: [swinog] Limiting Bandwidth on Cisco 3550 XL Switchport

(maybe not the thing you're looking for, but IHMO the best solution) If you have a spare machine (can be a 486), you can install FreeBSD with dummynet (trafficshaper) there and simply enter the IPs of the machines you would like to slow down (dummynet can even create random packet loss or

Re: [swinog] Again, Cablecom filtering!

Cablecom gave SwiNOG a contact address... email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax.: +41 1 277 95 12 Why not use that? Cheers, Viktor On Thursday 05 February 2004 14:54, Peter Baumann wrote: Hello I have again a problem with the strange email cablecom-filtering. We have a customer here which got A

[swinog] Looking for Hardware

Hi guys I'm willing to buy 1 x Cisco 1601 2 x WIC-1T I'll pay about 200-300 CHF for the Router and about 150 CHF for 1 WIC. Love it or leave it. Thanks Viktor -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/

Re: [swinog] be-event?

The BE organisator (Gloggi) is currently quite busy - so he doesn't find too much time to organize a BE right now. But I guess, he'll organize one for late january/early february... But who needs beer at these temparatures anyway... I'd rather settle for some hot tea... *b* (nobody says,

[swinog] UPS and AirCo

If anybody is interested in the following hardware, please contact me off-list... - Gutor- 20KW USV Anlage (Neupreis CHF 14'500.-) - Sanyo Split Klimaanlage 10.6 kw Kälteleistung (Neupreis CHF 9360.-) Cheers, Viktor -- Viktor Steinmann - System and Network Engineer Easynet AG, Hardturmstrasse

Re: [swinog] adsl speed

Double would be a little too much... since not everybody really uses his full bandwidth, the impact on the backbone will probably be between below 30% of traffic increase. It always depends on your customer structure - if you have many Kazaa/eDonkey/etc. users, they'll use the full bandwidth

[swinog] Swisscom - HELP!

minutes and we've heard nothing - nada from Swisscom. Does anyone from Swisscom read this? Does any SwiNOG guy have an internal number of the REAL people who can solve this? Please contact me off-list, thanks! Viktor -- Viktor Steinmann - System and Network Engineer Easynet AG, Hardturmstrasse

Re: [swinog] JFYI: Google Peering @TIX

Starting when? 194.42.48.584 15169 349769 365434 3481731100 3w6d2 Still up'n'running... ;-) Cheers, Viktor On Thursday 30 October 2003 10:39, Erich Hohermuth wrote: For those who don't read the LINX mailinglist: snip TIX Zurich, Switzerland IP Address -

Re: [swinog] VRRP between Juniper and Cisco

Don't know if this helps, but I have VRRP on my foundrys configured as follows: ip vrrp-extended vrid 2 backup priority 50 non-preempt-mode advertise backup ip-address 217.8.193.1 enable and on the other router ip vrrp-extended vrid 2 backup non-preempt-mode ip-address

Re: [swinog] SwiNOG-BE1 - Beer Event 1 in GVA ??

Beer DDos' are usually predictable - they happen usually on events such as bachelor partys (Polterabend) and military social events (e.g. Kompanieabend). But still if a DDos can be predicted, there's not always a way to stop it... :-) Viktor On Thursday 30 October 2003 16:15, Steven Glogger

Re: [swinog] Postfix help

Are you sure, that the mails in the queue are real mails - and not just bounces for spam, which is not deliverable? It they're bounces... they'll dissappear from the queue in 4 days :-) Cheers, Viktor On Friday 24 October 2003 13:57, Marcel Prisi wrote: Hi all ! We have a strange trouble

Re: [swinog] closing 7th edition

I agree. It was a very good meeting with many interesting topics. Thanks to our sponsors who made it all possible. Viktor On Wednesday 22 October 2003 20:39, julien mabillard wrote: hi, just some words for saying i was very happy to be there and it was an interesting day. i couldn't stay

Re: [swinog] Compliants from ADSL Users in the Biel area

So - a generell problem... Generell Protection Error? SCNR Dear Customer We already received some complaints about this area. We opened a Connectivity Ticket with number 5896. We will inform you also as soon as we get another update. If it works out that we have a generell problem

Re: [swinog] Domain grabbing: nextra.ch

Reading mails from a customers inbox as an ISP is not only not nice - it's not allowed by law if you can prove that fact, you can sue them... Cheers, Viktor On Thursday 02 October 2003 13:17, Nik Hug wrote: Since I got bounces from @nextra.ch, I thought of checking this domain at

Re: [swinog] Re: Case ID 1070964 - Notice of Claimed Infringement

Fredy et all I get about 10 such complaints per week: My statement: As long as *nobody* pays me the time I need to find out, which customer belongs to which IP, I will not do that work. Any legal issue has to be communicated by signed letter - or else it will land in the trashcan anyway...

Re: [swinog] as1257

Yup: 194.42.48.674 1257 108197 101181000 1w2d Active Cheers, Vikor On Friday 12 September 2003 15:34, Roger Buchwalder wrote: Hello I've got some problems with the peer to AS1257 this Link is down over a week. I've email'd them, but no answer... Do you guys

[swinog] Fwd: www.swinog.ch

SCHPAMMERS!!! Let's all click the supplied link... (wget --limit-rate= -r LINK) ^^ ;-) Cheers, Viktor ---BeginMessage--- Title: www.swinog.ch On Tue Sep 09, 2003 at 10:02:08 AM EDT we were unable to reach your website: http://www.swinog.ch/noc.html due to

Re: [swinog] filtering ICMP...

2) unacceptable, cause they no more deliver full internet access. Especially for BGP customers... For ADSL/dial-up customers, it might be acceptable, if the customer has a possibility to turn off the filters... Cheers, Viktor -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[swinog] Osirusoft Blacklist down

Maybe you've seen it on Slashdot, maybe not. If you're using the Blacklist relays.osirusoft.com you might reject ALL mail... don't use it anymore... Cheers, Viktor -- Viktor Steinmann - System and Network Engineer Easynet AG, Hardturmstrasse 135, 8005 Zuerich, Switzerland Phone: +41 1 560 32

Re: AW: [swinog] clock summer-time on Cisco?

Mike Meyers Mode Oh BEHAVE! /Mike Meyers Mode :-)) On Tuesday 26 August 2003 17:00, Andre Oppermann wrote: Viktor Steinmann wrote: Same here... (exactly the same... freaky, isn't it? ;-)) SCO MODE Yes, and all of you violated my exclusive copyright dating back to ancient history

Re: [swinog] 12.3.1a on LNS

core1.router uptime is 4 weeks, 1 day, 9 hours, 15 minutes System returned to ROM by reload at 02:24:22 CEST Wed Jun 25 2003 System restarted at 02:25:42 CEST Wed Jun 25 2003 System image file is disk0:c7400-js-mz.122-15.T2.bin Uptime would be higher, if I hadn't rebooted for testing purposes...

Re: [swinog] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Interface Blocked by IPv4 Packet

A little too late - we've been attacked tonight... Oh well... we'll survive :-) Cheers, Viktor On Thursday 17 July 2003 08:47, Roman Hochuli wrote: Hello Guys I think everybody should take a look at this advisory: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps341/products_security_advi

Re: [swinog] Strange AS16221 Announce

Why didn't you put the netmask on the network? I'm sure that somewhere in the router you configured ip classless, so you cannot assume, that the router will automatically assume, that 195.129.116.0 is a C-Class network... Cheers, Viktor On Wednesday 11 June 2003 08:14, Roger Buchwalder wrote:

Re: AW: [swinog] Black Sheep Swiss ISP: Backbone Solutions (was: Backbone PRO)

We gladly peer with every ISP there is in CH for free.. BUT A company which sends out spam and doesn't respect internet standards like netiquette is NO ISP. They are just a company lucky enough to have an own AS. So they should pay for transit to get their spam to us. Peering session removed.

Re: [swinog] Swinog-6 - Too many participants

I think it's a bad step to try to create an exclusive and elitary club out of the open-minded SwiNOG. Who says, that we are open-minded? We are Swiss! :-) SCNR, Stony -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:

Re: [swinog] Swinog-6 - Too many participants

I couldn't agree more... Viktor On Friday 28 March 2003 10:43, Patrick Studer wrote: ... We don't think that this user group should be A CUG, but perhaps if there isn't enoght place, that at first, ISP are welcome (max. 2 persons per ISP), and if there is still place, the could be also other

Re: WAS: [swinog] Swinog-6 - Too many participants, IS: Call for Beer :)

I'm (of course) in :-) Stony (aka Viktor) On Friday 28 March 2003 11:47, Steven Glogger wrote: hi all involved. Unless it's unreasonably difficult to get larger facilities, why not just create sub-events? as already discussed privately with stony we could have a private 'meeting' for

Re: [swinog] Dynamic users and routes

Ummm I had a similar problem about 2 weeks ago and was also looking for exactly the same thing - I gave up after 4 hours of googling, reading cisco docs and trying to create some nasty hack with policy-based-routing... Only radius-attributes did the trick... but if you find out something

[swinog] Cisco arrogance...

me an e-mail address of somebody @ Cisco with a clue and not arrogant enough to deny any customer contact?? Any suggestions for a nice replacment for the 1601 (NOT from Cisco...)? Cheers, Viktor -- Viktor Steinmann - System and Network Engineer Easynet AG, Hardturmstrasse 135, 8005 Zuerich

Re: [swinog] SwiNOG-6 announcement / Call for presentations

I agree totally with Andre, except for the Sprint stuff - if Sprint sponsors our meeting, I'm O.k. to listen to their sales guy there. But where has the PGP signing session gone, that everybody thought, was a good idea? Cheers, Viktor On Tuesday 25 February 2003 10:06, Andre Oppermann wrote:

Re: [swinog] SwiNOG-6 announcement / Call for presentations

I'd be interested in that - not so much, because I want to do it on my network, but out of curiosity, what swisscom does :-) Cheers, Viktor On Monday 24 February 2003 18:16, Andre Chapuis wrote: Hi, would a presentation about Internet prefix filtering / (routing table size reduction) be of

Re: [swinog] ADSL Featured on Kassensturz / SF1

Did you expect anything else? %-] F. No - but something else just occured to me. Is it just plain luck, that on the same day, that Cablecom announces phone over cable, they get a great review on Kassensturz? While watching TV yesterday, I imagined the Cablecom marketing manager sitting at

Re: [swinog] Size-Limitation of E-Mails :)

10 Megs per Mail (after encoding) People should definitely learn to use FTP for larger files... :-) Viktor On Wednesday 19 February 2003 13:54, Steven Glogger wrote: just a question by my side: what is your maximum size of email? (had a discussion with people who have 2.5 or 5 meg limits)

Re: [swinog] NPE-G1

If you don't use PXF (turn it off!), you might want to try 12.2(13)T - but it depends (as always) on the features you need. It runs stable for me Cheers, Viktor On Friday 14 February 2003 16:13, Michel Renfer wrote: Hi all! Which IOS do you use with NPE-G1 and seems to be stable? :-)

Re: [swinog] Google at TIX

First time I asked for a peering, I got no answer for 2 months. When I wrote again, I got the peering up'n'runing within 2 hours... Just try again :-) Cheers, Viktor On Thursday 13 February 2003 15:54, Michel Renfer wrote: Did anyone of you have a peering with google? I wrote several times

Re: [swinog] for all you hardware freaks

/me is getting wek knees and shaky hands - or the other way 'round... :-) On Wednesday 12 February 2003 10:00, S Brown wrote: http://hardware.localhost.nl/index.php?ct=browseshowdir=pictures -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:

Re: [swinog] Tiscali-ADSL blocking outbound SNMP traffic?

On Monday 03 February 2003 09:37, Viktor Steinmann wrote: used to block SNMP, Telnet and SNMP for ADSL customers (internet to That should read SNMP, Telnet and FTP (ZyXEL Configs can be uploaded via FTP with the default password!) Cheers, Viktor

Re: [swinog] RouteServer Maintenance

On Tuesday 28 January 2003 15:42, Viktor Steinmann wrote: On Tuesday 28 January 2003 15:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Pascal if you have to send an email to us anytimes that u reboot your route server, then u will send 15 emails a day ;))) Don't worry, he's not going to load

Re: [swinog] RouteServer Maintenance

A - HA - I think I found a nasty bug... Fredy? Did you somehow play with the mailing-list? It cuts off the last line of my mails... Or is that my mailer? I use KMail 1.4.3 Cheers, Viktor On Tuesday 28 January 2003 15:45, Viktor Steinmann wrote: On Tuesday 28 January 2003 15:42, Viktor

Re: [swinog] [Fwd: Sperrverfügungen der Untersuchungsrichterin des Kantons Waadt - Muster für eine Einsprache]

Unless you're packet filtering, restricting access via DNS or proxy is pointless, as I can bypass the proxy or use another DNS server, and I doubt anyone here realistically has the capacity to firewall all their clients. However, wouldn't actually complying with this sort of advice send a

Re: [swinog] [Fwd: Sperrverfügungen der Untersuchungsrichterin des Kantons Waadt - Muster für eine Einsprache]

Any news? On Tuesday 17 December 2002 13:53, Andre Oppermann wrote: FYI. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/

Re: [swinog] [Fwd: Sperrverfügungen der Untersuchungsrichterin des Kantons Waadt - Muster für eine Einsprache]

, Viktor Steinmann wrote: Any news? On Tuesday 17 December 2002 13:53, Andre Oppermann wrote: FYI. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ - Andre Chapuis IP+ Engineering

Re: [swinog] Re: [swinog] [Fwd: Sperrverfügungen der Untersuchungsrichterin des Kantons Waadt - Muster für eine Einsprache]

, and done affect the service you're offering to your customers. /noflame P. On Tuesday 17 December 2002 16:32, Andre Chapuis wrote: AS3303 will blackhole the affected IP-addresses tonight André At 16:18 17.12.2002 +0100, Viktor Steinmann wrote: Any news? On Tuesday 17 December

Re: [swinog] RE: [swinog] [Fwd: Sperrverfügungen der Untersuchungsrichterin des Kantons Waadt - Muster für eine Einsprache]

is the case for geocities.com. Cheers, Viktor On Tuesday 17 December 2002 16:52, Thoma, Stefan wrote: FYI: AS6730 will do the (hopefully temp.) proxy/dns 'filtering' from tonight. Stefan -Original Message- From: Viktor Steinmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Dienstag, 17. Dezember

Re: [swinog] Re: [swinog] Re: [swinog] [Fwd: Sperrverfügungen der Untersuchungsrichterin des Kantons Waadt -Muster für eine Einsprache]

I was just thinking... (maybe not a good idea at this time of the day...) If VIT recommends to blacklist the sites anyway and to send the protest letter... why would we need to send the letter today? I think, it's early enough tomorrow... Cheers, Viktor (I need a beer) On Tuesday 17 December

Re: [swinog] Fw: Sperrverfügung der Untersuchungsrichterin des Kantons Waadt - Weiteres Vorgehen

imho you can fake a primary zone on every DNS server - and if there's a fake zone, the server won't try to do a recursive lookup (which djbdns doesn't do anyway iirc) Cheers, Viktor On Monday 16 December 2002 17:24, Andre Oppermann wrote: Ms. Widmer writes in the last sentence that if the

[swinog] Swiss gov strikes again / Canton Vaud

In the heise news article it says, that VIT (Verband Inside Telecom) is gonna make a letter available to all ISPs, which can then be sent to the judge. Does anyone know, when/where this letter will be available? Cheers, Viktor -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[swinog] Swiss gov strikes again / Canton Vaud

block these sites on our proxies? Can this be it? Or do I have to blackhole-route the IP? Or make a fake DNS entry into our DNS servers for these sites? Anyway - seems like another braindead approach to internet control by the swiss govs... Viktor -- Viktor Steinmann - System and Network

Re: AW: [swinog] Swiss gov strikes again / Canton Vaud

How about, just one of us contacts Mr. Schwarzenegger (so he doesn't get spammed). Andre: Since you're somehow the law-guru of this group (according to your past mails) - can you contact him? Cheers, Viktor well, i think i give the contact details (i hope he doesn't hate me now, because he

Re: [swinog] Swiss gov strikes again / Canton Vaud

I suggest a joint press release of Swinog and SIUG, stating that we're not agree and why. I can contribute with our press-mailing-list (appx 100 adresses). Opinions? You got a GO from me... :-) Viktor -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:

Re: R: [swinog] Swiss gov strikes again / Canton Vaud

---snip-- to block a website!). Free tip from BAKOM: just block the website for 2-3 weeks, write this in a letter to Judge Dessaux, then un-block the website after that period has passed. If no further communication is received from the above mentioned judge, the matter can be considered

Re: AW: R: [swinog] Swiss gov strikes again / Canton Vaud

Probably these people have internet access at home too, so AOL (or the swiss equivalent) would have to block as well :-) eg Viktor On Thursday 12 December 2002 16:59, Fredy Kuenzler wrote: Steven Glogger wrote: put 0.0.0.0 netmask 0.0.0.0 (/0?) in a filter and block everything :) so no

Re: [swinog] Swiss gov strikes again / Canton Vaud

Here you go :-) It seems as if most of the providers will not obey (as you might have read in the thread). If you need the whole thread, you can read it under http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog@swinog.ch/msg00847.html Cheers, Viktor On Thursday 12 December 2002 17:35, Holger Bleich wrote:

Re: [swinog] swiss internet information

Hi Marco I'll give you a hint, in case you don't get any answers: Most of the stuff you're asking here is highly sensitive information, which no provider is willing to give out, except for large deal proposals (but then only with a non-disclosure agreement). Other stuff is extremely hard to

Re: [swinog] IRC Server

Thanks for your input. On Thursday 26 September 2002 18:05, Daniel Lorch wrote: hi, The server would only allow IP-Adresses from SwiNOG and not be member of any major IRC network - so we can keep the scriptkiddies out. How do you classify SwiNOG members? People peering with TIX? How

Re: [swinog] IRC Server

On the other hand I like to change my nick often - which is usually a problem on official IRC networks... and /nick I-am-out-to-lunch-but-will-read-later-on does not work usually :-) Cheers, Viktor On Thursday 26 September 2002 17:12, Pascal Gloor wrote: why add a ressouce when we

Re: [swinog] Where to sell old equipment?

Kuenzler wrote: Viktor Steinmann wrote: Anybody got an idea where you can sell old equipment (routers) in CH? Actually, there is nothing about 2ndhand trading in the SwiNOG charter, however I guess noone would mind if you post the list of equipment here?! F

Re: [swinog] Memory Question

iirc you can just put in normal PC-100 memory with ECC Give it a try - you'll save 5000 CHF :-) Cheers, Viktor On Thursday 11 July 2002 08:34, Michel Renfer wrote: Hi Marcel If i remember right, 71xx and 7200 with NPE-300 uses the same type of DRAM Memory. Possible that you will fill such

Re: [swinog] Swisscom and thier policy arround copper connections

beginning of 2002 without information to their customers (the ISP's) and let them walk into the open knife. I lost business about 6 weeks ago :-( Do you know, who got the business then? If it's Swisscom, maybe somebody in Comcom is interested to hear that? Cheers, Stony -- Viktor Steinmann