at's often called that contains many units that measure
the same quantities. But the SymPy unit systems define a single unit
for each quantity. So we may need to add multiple "systems" to
represent the imperial units.
Aaron Meurer
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 1:56 PM Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
&
I believe the imperial system should already be there, but if there's
anything missing, we should fix that.
Aaron Meurer
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 10:06 AM 'Henrique Miguel Cortes Soares' via
sympy wrote:
>
> So, should the imperial system be added? If not, what system could
I would say that new unit systems should be added only if they are
generally used and useful. General improvements to the units module
are always welcome. Francesco is the main maintainer of the units
module, so he would know more details on what needs to be done there.
Aaron Meurer
On Tue, Apr
. For example, there is
support for asymptotic expansions (aseries()), although I don't know
if Sterling's approximation is implemented.
Aaron Meurer
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 1:25 PM Matthew Robinson wrote:
>
> Dear SymPy Developers Group,
>
> I hope this email finds you well. I am current
dumb questions, but I am not the greatest computer expert ☹
>
> Peter
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sympy@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of Aaron
> Meurer
> Sent: Sonntag, 14. April 2024 05:30
> To: sympy@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [sympy] Re: SymPy integration
by a grammar-based parser in parse_latex()) at
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/26128.
Aaron Meurer
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 12:17 AM Samith Kavishke
wrote:
>
> Are there any plans from our side for the LLM that use Sympy?
>
> On Friday, April 12, 2024 at 2:11:13 AM UTC+5:30 Franc
Actually it looks like other people are seeing this as well, and I
just saw it myself https://github.com/sympy/live/issues/21.
Aaron Meurer
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 1:13 PM Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> It would mean there's some issue with jupyterlite or pyodide. I
> checked and it loa
seeing if turning it off fixes it.
Aaron Meurer
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 9:29 AM Chris Smith wrote:
>
> Lately, the live.sympy.org page never finishes loading for me. Does anyone
> know why this might be?
>
> /c
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscri
Did you already submit your proposal? The deadline to submit was last
week, and we are unable to extend it.
Aaron Meurer
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 6:48 AM Aquazod wrote:
>
> Hello,
> My name is Assem Ali and I'm currently working on my proposal for the Parsing
> project.
>
> Fi
I would open an issue to discuss this, if you haven't already. These
sorts of issues relating to what Add class is used to represent sums
generally end up being pretty tricky and involve a lot of subtleties.
Aaron Meurer
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 12:33 PM Davide Pittet wrote:
>
> I
of time coding them.
If there's any changes you want to make that aren't potentially
controversial, like bugfixes, you don't need to open issues for them
first.
Aaron Meurer
On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 2:02 PM Davide Pittet wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> following up the discussion on Gi
I've updated the ideas page with a link to an issue that discusses some
ways that benchmarks on GitHub Actions could be improved.
Aaron Meurer
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 2:35 AM Sam Lubelsky wrote:
> Yeah, I see no good reason for why the benchmark results show the Master
> vs previous r
in PRs would be disallowed,
the same as test failures in PRs are currently disallowed.
Aaron Meurer
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:13 AM Jason Moore wrote:
>
> This is my opinion, not sure if it is shared, but I don't think anyone uses
> the information that is displayed on the pull request. T
roject description it says " the results are run and hosted Ad Hoc",
> which I assumes means whatever computer is running all the other PR tests.
> Just want to make sure this is correct.
For the asv runs that run against every commit in history, those are
indeed currently run
We would generally only accept one proposal for each project, unless
the proposals are distinct enough that they can be done independently.
Aaron Meurer
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 4:43 PM Tommaso Vaccari wrote:
>
> Thank you Aaron, I'll add it to the proposal, I have a question, more people
I think we should try to include something like this in SymPy.
I'm a little confused by your screenshot. eq =@ c = d is not valid
Python syntax. Are you extending the parser somehow to make it valid?
Aaron Meurer
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 2:10 PM 'gu...@uwosh.edu' via sympy
wrote:
>
> It
correctly.
Aaron Meurer
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 5:36 PM Chris Smith wrote:
>
> In https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/26399 there is proposal to allow
> `subs` to recognize `Eq` so ` x.subs(x, 1) = x.subs( Eq(x, 1) ) = x.subs( [
> Eq(x, 1) ] ) = 1` but `x.subs(Eq(1, x)) = x`.
Remember that there is a requirement to make a pull request to SymPy.
You should list any pull requests you have made to SymPy in your
proposal.
Aaron Meurer
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 1:43 AM Tommaso Vaccari wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
> Here's my proposal, I would like to seek some
, we've accepted ~5 people each year and I would guess
this year will likely be around the same number. You can look at the
reports on the wiki to see the actual numbers for each year.
Aaron Meurer
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 7:13 AM Xianrui “Oliver” Teng
wrote:
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I hop
You can put it on the wiki if you like to get public feedback. If
there isn't a page for it, it just means no one has created it yet.
Aaron Meurer
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 11:13 AM Tommaso Vaccari wrote:
>
> Ah ok thanks, I was asking because I have seen that in the previous
think the core of it does need to remain
independent of SymPy's types, especially if we want to try to write a
Rust backend.
Aaron Meurer
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 6:29 PM Samith Kavishke
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> If we are maintianing matchpy as our own repository, Is it okay for us to
> make
mportance to me that functions
> would look familiar, sin(x), not Sin[x]. Instead of simply using
> SymPy I finally found myself wanting to improve the library,
> but that is another story.
Aaron Meurer
On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 10:31 AM Oscar Benjamin
wrote:
>
> Hi all SymPy com
e different packages support older
versions.
Aaron Meurer
>
> SymPy itself broadly tries to have wide version support for other
> packages like numpy just because without listing them as hard
> dependencies there is no way to indicate which versions sympy is
> compatible with
Mathics has a license that makes it incompatible with sympy. But
regardless, I think we should find a way to make RUBI work without
having to build a full Wolfram language interpreter.
Aaron Meurer
On Sat, Mar 2, 2024 at 10:10 AM Samith Kavishke
wrote:
>
> Is that means this p
Yes, that idea is new this year.
Aaron Meurer
On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 2:08 AM Samith Kavishke
wrote:
>
> If that so, what are the ideas that we can really contribute? I hope
> "Enhancing the flexibility of MatchPy" is still needed.
>
> On Sunday, March 3, 2024 at
I've Cced Francesco Bonazzi about the Wolfram Interpreter idea. It
relates to the RUBI project, but I don't know whether it is something
that is still needed for it. Personally I would prefer to avoid
creating a Wolfram Language interpreter if possible.
Aaron Meurer
On Sat, Mar 2, 2024 at 11:31
with
distribute(False) and once with distribute(True) (because the current
behavior also has to continue to work and be tested). This is how the
_both_exp_pow decorator works
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/blob/ab2fb691a90457b65bbf2a7c091c8265be9cee09/sympy/testing/pytest.py#L291.
Aaron Meurer
d be more tricky
> than one might expect.
I might not be following exactly what you are saying here, but
wouldn't something like
assert f() == 2*(x + y)
work regardless of whether distribution is enabled or not? It will
either happen to both sides of the equation or to neither side.
Aaron M
, as even currently
automatic distribution is not guaranteed. For example, it doesn't
happen with 2*x*(x + y). And it's not uncommon to have un-distributed
expressions because functions like factor() create them.
Aaron Meurer
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 2:15 PM Chris Smith wrote:
>
> In order to
fic test passes with
automatic distribution turned off (similar to this one
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/blob/ae13ee38f54aa9c8944ef7d103dda778d2a39dbd/sympy/testing/pytest.py#L291).
That way we can start fixing the code incrementally, instead of taking
an "all or nothing" approach, which has failed i
the fact as Chris suggests is
probably the better solution. There's really no guarantees about what
the form of an expression from diff() will look like.
Aaron Meurer
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 12:10 PM Chris Smith wrote:
>
> Autodistribution of Number into an Add is how SymPy works
I think maybe there were some checks that were done by flake8 that
weren't yet implemented by ruff. I don't know if that's still the
case. I agree we could probably just use ruff if it is doing
everything flake8 does.
Aaron Meurer
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 6:50 AM Shishir Kushwaha
wrote:
>
The order argument to the printers is definitely under-documented.
This has been an issue for some time.
Aaron Meurer
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 10:41 AM Thomas Ligon wrote:
>
> Thanks! This does exaclty what I wanted.
> Now, for the question, should I be embarassed for not finding
break other things. Instead, you should use the
existing flags in the printer in question, or customize the printer
with a subclass if the built-in behavior doesn't meet your needs.
Aaron Meurer
On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 1:58 PM Thomas Ligon wrote:
>
> I am trying to reverse the
t/configuration.html#configuration-file.
This should be a straightforward thing to change if you want to make a
PR.
Aaron Meurer
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 3:51 PM Shishir Kushwaha
wrote:
>
> I am getting the same errors on the master branch as well . Has it got
> something to do with the de
Another thing I forgot to mention: new this year is small projects,
which are 90 hour projects, in addition to the 175 and 350 hour
projects. Right now, none of the ideas specify 90 hours, but we should
probably add some smaller projects to the list.
Aaron Meurer
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 11:49 AM
of these dependencies,
you can ignore those tests.
xfail means that a test is expected to fail. These are tests that are
added for behavior that doesn't work yet. You can ignore these.
Aaron Meurer
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 10:28 AM Shishir Kushwaha
wrote:
>
> S and X have been coming on a few test when I ran
The slotscheck test is run on CI but isn't included in the normal
local tests run. If you want to run it locally you will need to
install slotscheck and run 'slotscheck sympy/'
Aaron Meurer
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 2:02 PM Shishir Kushwaha
wrote:
>
> I am getting an error in
> Check for
I'll also add that if you want to, we'll give triage permissions to
just about anyone so they can go through and label old issues (triage
permissions give you permissions to label issues). Just ask me or
Oscar.
Aaron Meurer
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 2:25 PM Oscar Benjamin
wrote:
>
>
On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 3:28 PM Oscar Benjamin
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 21:52, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 9:41 AM Oscar Benjamin
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I think that probably the right way to do this is just for
email.
Aaron Meurer
On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 10:36 AM Shishir Kushwaha
wrote:
>
> Do I need to add my details everytime to thee .mailmap file when making a PR
> , I did it in my first PR as mentioned in the documentation but when creating
> a new comitt on another issue , the
opt-in is just an extra step
for those people. The only way this wouldn't be the case is if we add
flint as a dependency in the conda package like we do for gmpy, but it
sounds like it's a bit early to do that.
Although I'm wondering about Sage. Does Sage always install both SymPy
and python-flint?
A
I'm not sure what's going on then. I just tested the docker container
and it works for me. You may need to delete the container and rebuild
it.
Aaron Meurer
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 1:15 PM Shishir Kushwaha
wrote:
>
> Yes that's what I did , I followed the steps mentioned in the documen
to your local environment and build without using docker.
Aaron Meurer
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 1:43 AM Shishir Kushwaha
wrote:
>
> I was trying to build documentation using docker and on running the commands
> mentioned in the documentation , I was getting this error .
>
>
really like the low hanging fruit ideas because
they generate a lot of low quality applications and noise, but at the
same time, we have definitely had some good people in the past who
have started with such projects.
Aaron Meurer
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 4:16 PM Oscar Benjamin
wrote:
>
> I'm
I already submitted the application with the
link to https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-Ideas, so whatever is
on that page will be "the ideas page".
Aaron Meurer
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 12:54 PM Oscar Benjamin
wrote:
>
> Hi Aaron,
>
> I think we should start by removing e
mentor but
want to help review applications, just let me know.
If you are someone who is interested in applying to SymPy for GSoC,
start here. https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-Student-Instructions
Aaron Meurer
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
p? I'm really only
> interested in this for static presentation output (pdf, html) so it wouldn't
> matter if it doesn't work in interactive modes.
I think the only way to know if it will work or not is to test it. I
suspect it will work for pdf output, but I have no idea if it will
work in the
recommend using Jupyterlab or Jupyter notebook. If
you are running into performance issues, it is likely the issue has to
do with SymPy itself rather than your interpreter.
Aaron Meurer
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 2:33 AM Abhay Kumar wrote:
>
> Hi
> I have gone through this contributing to Sym
on it if people like it.
Aaron Meurer
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web vi
.
Of course, you can also just run SymPy in a Jupyter notebook, which
will render output using MathJax, which generally looks better than
the Unicode output, and works on any platform.
Aaron Meurer
On Mon, Jan 1, 2024 at 11:45 PM Robert Dodier wrote:
>
> Hi, I am working on a nicer terminal d
solutions for you.
Aaron Meurer
On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 10:17 AM Mario Lemelin wrote:
>
> If I had one functionality to have in Sympy, it would be the possibility to
> get access to a list of symbols that I am using in my notebook. A function
> called, let's say LstSymbols(), which g
n
all" in your notebook to reset the state and ensure everything runs
again.
Aaron Meurer
On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 10:24 AM Mario Lemelin wrote:
>
> Hello,
> This is my first time. Just wondering if there is a command that I can do
> when, in a jupyter notebook, when I want to go b
to upstream it. I'm excited to see that
codegen for matrix expressions is finally starting to improve.
Aaron Meurer
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 12:31 AM Jason Moore wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've made a blog post summarizing all the work we did for 1/3 of the CZI
> grant:
>
> https:
. If you want to
use NumPy to do numeric calculations on these expressions, this should
be done explicitly at the end after converting your SymPy expression
into a NumPy function using lambdify().
Aaron Meurer
On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 4:45 AM Lenni Lemoy wrote:
>
> Hi Aaron, thank you for your
on the LLL-parts first
> while waiting for 1.1.3 to become available.
There's no reason to not ask this question. And
anyways, Oscar mentioned to me that he wants to make a release soon so
(hopefully) it should be out before the end of the year, if not month.
Aaron Meurer
>
> MAN
Yes, although a few pages are only available in the dev docs
(https://docs.sympy.org/dev/index.html). All the relevant pages are
linked to from the blog post.
Aaron Meurer
On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 3:12 AM wrote:
>
> Dear Aaron,
>
> Thanks!
> Is this new documentation available now?
I have written a blog post about the documentation work that I did as
part of the CZI EOSS cycle 4 grant.
https://labs.quansight.org/blog/sympy-documentation
Feedback on the new documentation pages or documentation feedback in
general is always welcome.
Aaron Meurer
--
You received
l#separate-symbolic-and-numeric-code
Aaron Meurer
On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 8:15 PM Lenni Lemoy wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I just started using SymPy, and tried to multiply a matrix M by a vector x
> holding sympy.symbols.
>
> I expected that M*x will be a vector again, but it is a
I think it can be added. Can you make a pull request?
Aaron Meurer
On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 10:18 AM Mathias Louboutin
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Would it be possible to add our project devito:
>
> https://www.devitoproject.org/
>
> to the "Project using sympy" in the d
trol over how much computation
is done. And you end up with defaults that try to do way too much
computation, which ends up slowing things down.
Aaron Meurer
>
> I don't really appreciate the preference for using `is_gt(a,b)` instead of
> `(a > b) is S.true` or else I may have
at causes
SymPy to hang on very simple things that should return instantly (see
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/10800 for another example of
this). We need to move to a model where evalf is never called
automatically, except for cases where it is known that it will be very
cheap.
Aaron Meure
Also I resubmitted part 1 at the request of the HN mods and it has
some comments as well https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37430759
Aaron Meurer
On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 1:09 AM Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> I posted this to Hacker News, where it got some comments.
> https://news.ycombi
By the way, if you install SymPy from conda-forge, they gmpy2 will be
installed automatically. If you use conda-forge chances are you've already
been using it this whole time.
Aaron Meurer
On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 1:13 AM wrote:
> Dear Oscar,
>
> Thanks!
> I installed it (I used anac
I posted this to Hacker News, where it got some comments.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37426080
Aaron Meurer
On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 5:08 PM Oscar Benjamin
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have a new blog post following the last one:
> https://oscarbenjamin.github.io/blog
l lead to an endless number of bugs and
unexpected behavior.
Basically, when evaluation happens all the time and certain invariants
about expressions always hold, then functions are written assuming
those invariants. It isn't even done intentionally most of the time.
The only way out of this is to have a core tha
On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 4:12 AM Oscar Benjamin
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 1 Sept 2023 at 06:45, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> >
> > I like the idea of using some faster linear algebra as a preprocessor
> > to reduce the size of the problem to be solved. You could then take
> >
so wondering if you've thought about symbolic constants and if
there's any tricks you could do to support them. I think there might
be, especially when still thinking about things in terms of just using
faster linear algebra as a pre-processor to a symbolic solve.
Aaron Meurer
>
> -- Shahriar
&g
h could help it out.
Actually it wouldn't be much work to generalize this to something that
gives an exact answer at least some of the time. For example, you
could use nsimplify() to guess at exact values for numeric
coefficients. As long as diff(answer) - integrand symbolically
simplifies to
all over the place, so focusing on matrices for now can lead to
bigger performance wins.
Aaron Meurer
>
> It might be best if the result is assigned to a variable so as to
> exclude the cost of converting it to a string.
>
> I am sure I am teaching my grandmother to suck eggs (not that either
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 12:08 PM Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> Thank you for the blog post Oscar. I submitted it to Hacker News as
> well https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37150867
>
> I agree with all the things you wrote. I agree with the idea of having
> computation subsystems
istinction between lower level fast data
structures and higher level data structures. And in particular, it
means that slower abstractions like automatic evaluation have leaked
in which really should only ever be part of the top level layers.
I look forward to reading the followup blog posts.
Aa
.
There's also, unfortunately, an issue currently with the website repo
where the GitHub actions deploy script is broken (see
https://github.com/sympy/sympy.github.com/pull/187). That should be
fixed before any further PRs are merged, or else it will break the
website.
Aaron Meurer
On Mon, Aug 14
I don't know why Oscar closed that issue. NumPy does have a lot of
methods for defining how custom objects interact with it. I did some
basic tests and it seems like adding __array__ to Number would do
exactly what we want here.
Aaron Meurer
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 2:37 AM Idan Pazi wrote
(which I wouldn't necessarily recommend).
Aaron Meurer
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 11:37 AM Idan Pazi wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Is there a way I could configure NumPy or SymPy so that NumPy functions would
> accept SymPy numbers (e.g. sympy.Rational)?
>
> For example:
> >>> i
les/logic.html
As a general rule of thumb, if you find yourself doing mathematical
operations using string manipulation, that means you are using SymPy
wrong. SymPy is designed to do mathematical operations directly, and
doesn't work by operating on strings.
Aaron Meurer
On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 2:41 AM Nick
repos using master and others using
main to be confusing.
Aaron Meurer
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To
of the repo and is using "git checkout
master; git pull" will have their workflows broken when master stops
being updated. I don't know if there's a clean way we can do anything
about that.
Aaron Meurer
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 9:25 PM Sangyub Lee wrote:
>
> I think that github dec
SymPy unless they click the button to show the code that ChatGPT generated.
It might end up that a lot of people end up using SymPy with it but most of
them never actually realize it.
Aaron Meurer
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 1:56 AM Francesco Bonazzi
wrote:
> Nice. Are there any chan
If it's not too hard to separate them that might be better just
because the documentation pull request will probably be able to be
merged much quicker and the Zeilberger algorithm may require more
review changes before it can be merged.
Aaron Meurer
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 8:39 AM robert
On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 4:15 PM David Bailey wrote:
>
> On 05/07/2023 21:40, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> > For interactive use, just passing a string to S() (or equivalently
> > sympify() or parse_expr()) is the simplest way to deal with this.
> > However, I would avoid this f
ions, like
x = symbols('x', real=True)
then this will be a *different* symbol. For example:
>>> x = symbols('x', real=True)
>>> expr = S("x + 1")
>>> x + expr
x + x + 1
This can lead to all sorts of confusion. So really only use string
input if you are very ca
,
but I'm confident we will be able to convince the SymPy community that
Hypothesis is a tool that we should be using regularly in the SymPy
test suite.
Aaron Meurer
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this grou
.
Aaron Meurer
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 5:29 PM David Bailey wrote:
>
> I wonder if anyone here can explain why some mathematical functions -
> e.g. sin and gamma evaluate completely if given a floating point
> argument, while others such as besselj(0,0.2) only evaluate completely
es currently do not
know about the sympy.codegen classes. The idea is to eventually
replace everything with the sympy.codegen ast nodes.
Aaron Meurer
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 12:45 AM Morten Olsen Lysgaard
wrote:
>
> Ah, there is an inconsistency in the above email. I am saying I want
> do
expressions are all real, so they should be reexpressed without using i.
Aaron Meurer
what you want is to rewrite powers as exponentials if possible. If so
> that can be done with e.rewrite(exp):
>
> >>> from sympy import *
> >>> i = I
> >>> a = i**(
ducing classes for
Cables and Improving the Truss class". Mentors: Prakhar Saxena and Advait Pote
Tilo Reneau-Cardoso, "Improving Relational Assumptions in SymPy’s New
Assumptions". Mentors: Aaron Meurer and Francesco Bonazzi
Tirthankar Mazumder, "Rewrite LaTeX Parser".Me
Poly is designed to expand all polynomials out. If you just want the
terms of an expression as you've written it you can use
Add.make_args(). I wouldn't really call these the "coefficients" of
the expression though.
Aaron Meurer
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 11:02 AM Paul Royik wrote:
.
Aaron Meurer
On Saturday, April 15, 2023 at 7:05:11 PM UTC-6 tilor...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello SymPy Community,
>
> Yesterday I was admitted to an REU for over the summer. However, I'm more
> interested in participating in GSoC with SymPy. While I understand that
> decisions
I was actually thinking about the printing methods that are on the
classes themselves
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/blob/master/sympy/physics/vector/vector.py#L222.
For the custom printers themselves, I can see more of a rationale for
keeping them in the physics module.
Aaron Meurer
On Thu, Apr
printing bugs
than most other SymPy objects.
Aaron Meurer
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 8:28 AM Jason Moore wrote:
>
> For the physics objects, I recommend copying how we've done it for Vector and
> Dyadic. We keep the printing code in the physics.vector modules because these
> objects don't s
On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 10:29 AM Oscar Benjamin
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2 Apr 2023 at 02:19, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 5:04 AM Oscar Benjamin
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 1 Apr 2023 at 06:36, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> > > >
printers by making
correct use of the prettyform class.
Aaron Meurer
On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 2:33 PM Pedro Xavier wrote:
>
> I'm trying to close issue #12157 through the PR #25012.
>
> In summary, the issue comes from the physics dyadic
> (sympy/physics/vector/dyadic.py)
tionally interface with faster C implementations (e.g., gmpy2).
It would be good to dig into Z3 and see how well it does on these
sorts of problems, and if possible, determine if there are any
specific algorithms its using under the hood.
Aaron Meurer
> On Wednesday, March 29, 2023 at 12:26:47
On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 5:04 AM Oscar Benjamin
wrote:
>
> On Sat, 1 Apr 2023 at 06:36, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 10:33 PM Jason Moore wrote:
> > >
> > > When the # of dependencies is large, dependabot is a very annoying
> > &g
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/blob/master/doc/requirements.txt
I don't know if there's a tool that lets you easily see how often
these are updated but my guess would be 1-5 updates a week.
Aaron Meurer
>
> Jason
> moorepants.info
> +01 530-601-9791
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023
from different modules, but it's best if your
proposal focuses on a single coherent goal.
Aaron Meurer
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sympy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
I only ever hear bad things about dependabot. I don't have any
experience with it myself, but I would be cautious about using it.
Maybe try reaching out to other communities that have tried it to see
what their experiences have been.
Aaron Meurer
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 8:20 AM Oscar Benjamin
CoordSys3D when
it could just use Matrix.norm, although that's just random and if you ask
it the same thing it might not do that.
Aaron Meurer
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 4:03 PM Chris Smith wrote:
> Use with caution -- the set-up can be right and the answer wrong as in:
>
> What is the norm
e.
>>
>> You may also be interested in lfortran, which is a different GSoC
>> organization
>> (https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/programs/2023/organizations/fortran-lang),
>> but which has close ties to SymPy (Ondřej Čertík the creator of lfortran
>> was also
1 - 100 of 5797 matches
Mail list logo
