Hi,
fly wrote:
Hey
I wonder if it is useful to tag bicycle=dismount on ways.
At least in Germany there is no official traffic sign despite of the
existence of some.
Every time I see such a sign, I get very angry about the fucking moron,
who was responsible for this bullshit. Of course,
In my part of Italy - I don't know whether this is correct for the entire
country - it is *normal *on cycleways that run parallel to roads that at
every point where there is a lateral road, there is a *pedestrian* crossing
across the lateral road where the cyclists are requested by law to
Am 08/ott/2013 um 01:58 schrieb SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk:
Er, what?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
+1, that's exactly the reason. A building is not the same feature as the
business occupying it.
cheers,
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
Er, what?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
+1, that's exactly the reason. A building is not the same feature as the
business occupying it.
Cool down, Martin. Amenity (or shop or whatever) reusing the building
Le 08/10/2013 10:21, Pieren a écrit :
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
Er, what?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
+1, that's exactly the reason. A building is not the same feature as the
business occupying it.
Cool down, Martin. Amenity (or
2013/10/8 Pieren pier...@gmail.com
Cool down, Martin.
I am cooled down ;-)
Amenity (or shop or whatever) reusing the building
polygon is common practice.
yes, it is common practice, and it is a shortcut that works at least as
long as there are only very few attributes, but there are
2013/10/8 Dominik George n...@naturalnet.de
Yes it does. If there is only a footway sign, cyclists are allowed to use
the road. If there is a sign telling to dismount the bike, cyclists must
use the pedestrian way, pushing their bike.
Given that you seem to refer to the situation in
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
If you put a tag wikipedia to a building like this, will
it refer to the building or to the amenity?
Yep but ... buildings with dedicated wikipedia articles or names are
the exception. There is also a disadvantage to draw the same polygon
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:09 AM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hey
I wonder if it is useful to tag bicycle=dismount on ways.
At least in Germany there is no official traffic sign despite of the
existence of some.
You are allowed to push your bike on every footway/pedestrian plus
I wonder if it is useful to tag bicycle=dismount on ways.
At least in Germany there is no official traffic sign despite of the
existence of some.
You are allowed to push your bike on every footway/pedestrian plus ways
with vehicle=no. E.g. it is useless. Either you are allowed to ride
Stefan Tiran stefan.ti...@student.tugraz.at wrote:
Hi,
fly wrote:
Hey
I wonder if it is useful to tag bicycle=dismount on ways.
At least in Germany there is no official traffic sign despite of the
existence of some.
Every time I see such a sign, I get very angry about the
On 07.10.2013 22:37, Stefan Tiran wrote:
Hi,
fly wrote:
Hey
I wonder if it is useful to tag bicycle=dismount on ways.
At least in Germany there is no official traffic sign despite of the
existence of some.
Every time I see such a sign, I get very angry about the fucking moron,
who
Please, add your opinion about using emergency=aed or
emergency=defibrillator or the next two alternatives on the wiki.
At the moment, we have a ~ 3:1 ratio for defibrillator against aed.
It's here:
On 10/8/13 10:32 AM, fly wrote:
In all situation we do not need bicycle=dismount.
Can anyone state that in her/his country this traffic_sign is official
and not made up by some people ?
well, i can't say official for sure, but the dismount signs posted on
the various
Hudson River crossings
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Ole Nielsen on-...@xs4all.nl wrote:
At least in the Netherlands you have to distinguish between bicycle=no and
bicycle=dismount. Some pedestrian streets are explicitly signed with no
bicycle pushing. In other words you may not bring your bicycle here. Thus
Would bicycle:dismount be better than bicycle_dismount? Seems like that would
be more in keeping with current key naming conventions.
Tod
--
Sent from my mobile device. Please excuse my brevity.
Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:
I think dismount should be a key, not a value -
We could also tag whether they are horizontal axis (windmill-style) or
vertical-axis (Savonius rotor) turbines. This could be helpful for
people looking for landmarks, as the two types look very different.
__John
___
Tagging mailing list
On 08/10/2013 02:33, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
At least in the Netherlands you have to distinguish between
bicycle=no and bicycle=dismount. Some pedestrian streets are explicitly
signed with no bicycle pushing.
I never heard of that, what sign do you mean? In which contexts is out
used? Do you
2013/10/8 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com
I know buildings on steep areas which have two different ground levels
so simply building height is really difficult.
this is actually common, you will very often have different levels around a
building, also in more or less even terrain. The
2013/10/8 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com
Can anyone state that in her/his country this traffic_sign is official
and not made up by some people ?
you are only refering to public roads, but private owners could impose
whatever rules they like, e.g. on private squares, private shopping malls
2013/10/8 Ole Nielsen on-...@xs4all.nl
Here is one found in a local shopping centre in Rijswijk (crappy phone
photo made in poor lighting).
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/**wiki/File:Fiets-verboden.jpghttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Fiets-verboden.jpg
It literally translates to
On 8 October 2013 19:46, Ole Nielsen on-...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Here is one found in a local shopping centre in Rijswijk (crappy phone
photo made in poor lighting).
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/**wiki/File:Fiets-verboden.jpghttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Fiets-verboden.jpg
It
Just for your reference - while for many cases, I agree that bicycle=no
is appropriate, there are quite interesting cycleways in the Czech
Republic, where using bicycle=dismount for nodes on a path would
make things easier for people editing OSM. Consider this:
On 8 October 2013 20:11, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/10/8 Ole Nielsen on-...@xs4all.nl
Here is one found in a local shopping centre in Rijswijk (crappy phone
photo made in poor lighting).
2013/10/8 Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl
No, the legal basis is a local regulation called Algemene Plaatselijke
Verordening (General local ordinance):
http://decentrale.regelgeving.overheid.nl/cvdr/xhtmloutput/Historie/Rijswijk/107457/107457_1.html
the liberal times of the
Hi,
John F. Eldredge wrote:
If you really meant it is in no way acceptable to require people to dismount
their bikes,
Indeed this is what I meant. Thanks for pointing out this ambiguity!
what about the real-life situation I described earlier, a narrow
footway along one side of a bridge,
Stefan Tiran stefan.ti...@student.tugraz.at wrote:
Hi,
John F. Eldredge wrote:
If you really meant it is in no way acceptable to require people to
dismount
their bikes,
Indeed this is what I meant. Thanks for pointing out this ambiguity!
what about the real-life situation I
Can anyone state that in her/his country this traffic_sign is official
and not made up by some people ?
Not my country, but in the UK it's listed here:
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2002/3113/schedule/5/made
Some countries have a blanket allowance for using a text only sign when no
On the units I've seen in the wild the term aed or AED appears in
nearly every case, but the word defibrillator is frequently absent.
That said, while the debate ranges on the tag name, there are other issues
of tagging that need some attention. For example access:
The Dutch example is based on a local (municipal) ordinance which regulates
whether you are allowed to walk your bicycle in this pedestrian zone. So, it is
a real regulation (but it is not an example of a bicycle dismount
regulation).
Bicycles are not allowed at all, so a bicycle=no tag could
On Wed, 09 Oct 2013 07:06:54 Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
On the units I've seen in the wild the term aed or AED appears in
nearly every case, but the word defibrillator is frequently absent.
Yup, in Japan they are *everywhere*, with orange enclosures and big letters
reading AED.
Andrew
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 1:46 PM, François Lacombe
francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu wrote:
You can send me any formal and constructive suggestion about that.
Vote will begin shortly. Stay tuned.
I've found the power proposal a bit much to follow...
... but have found it satisfying to map
32 matches
Mail list logo
