I didn't see anything about them reverting that decision. They still remove
original images.
Unless you've got a source on the they changed it again
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020, 11:49 Niels Elgaard Larsen wrote:
> Simon Poole:
> >
> > Am 07.10.2020 um 01:13 schrieb Niels Elgaard Larsen:
> >> ...
> >>
entralized solution, OSMF should be the one paying the costs, but
> then we would pay dearly (someone on Reddit did some estimates).
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 6:59 AM Thibault Molleman <
> thibaultmolle...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> - I'm doubtful of the future of openstreetcam
>>
- I'm doubtful of the future of openstreetcam
- some people don't like Facebook to the point where they don't want to use
mapillary so we need to have an alternative
And that still doesn't solve the problem of not having a system to put
multiple images into one tag
Cheers
Thibault
On Thu, Aug
CJ,
I didn't realize the accept header could work like that.
I think the system your propose is a good idea tbh.
Also, I wonder if it would be possible to host those on IPFS. (And make it
so that people who have spare bandwidth/storage can help host this image
repository)
Cheers,
Thibault
On
yeah, having a bot to automatically mark images that are being used in osm
sounds like a good solution tbh.
(next step would be to have a bot that automatically checks the Deletion
Request pages to see if any of the one being added there are osm linked
ones and make a copy to ipfs or something
Does it being on osm have enough justification for them to keep it though?
"it's not a wikimedia project, so it doesn't matter to us if it's linked on
osm or not"
On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 15:39, Paul Allen wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 10:06, Thibault Molleman <
> thibaul
Btw, I want to make it clear that I have nothing against the wikimedia
foundation. I think it's fair that they moderate like they do, because
their capacity isn't unlimited
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020, 14:51 Thibault Molleman
wrote:
> Can you link photos/deletion requests?
>
> Again, don
>
> Can you link photos/deletion requests?
Again, don't bother with that. I was 13, didn't know what I was doing, main
reason why they were deleted according to the deletion requests were
because they didn't have a license attached to them, so they didn't know if
it was even allowed on there.
.
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personality_rights
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Data_Protection_Regulation
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_be_forgotten
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celebrity_privacy#Right_of_publicity
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Righ
on the wiki that this is the thing you
should do if you want to upload multiple images
Cheers,
Thibault
On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 11:30, Andy Mabbett
wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 10:04, Thibault Molleman
> wrote:
> >
> > Ah, I feel like there are certain images that migh
at 10:54, bkil wrote:
> As mentioned on the linked wiki page, you can escape a semicolon by
> doubling it:
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator#Escaping_with_.27.3B.3B.27
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 9:11 AM Thibault Molleman <
> thibaultmoll
I think what Mateusz was referring to was seeing if we could somehow copy
the system that commons uses?
(so that any app that can already accept wikimedia commons galleries also
can use this new system)
Cheers
On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 10:31, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>
That's a good idea actually!
Although I guess there is a part of me that thinks that having just a
simple image tag without any fancy stuff is still best for a primary image
(so that apps that want to implement it don't need to start messing with
this new format and can just load that simple url.
While I use the semicolon for some other tags already, the problem with
using it for something that has a URL.
Is that TECHNICALLYaccording to the specification, a URL can contain a
semicolon.
So I feel like the use of a semicolon in a url based tag isn't a good
solution
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020,
Hi,
It seems like there (still) isn't a proper tagging system to put multiple
images on one node/way/relation.
Having the ability to link other images as well would be useful I think.
Either via:
`image=url1;url2;url3`
or
```
image=url1
image:2=url2
image:3=url3
```
That later would allow for any
Update on my example I gave. We changed it to
addr:housename=Residentie Den Oude Post
addr:housenumber=14
addr:street=Kasteelstraat
addr:unit=1A;2A;3A
A more complex example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/699214532
So this is Kasteelstraat 5
The bank that's located on the bottom floor is on
name in as
well "*Den
> Oude Post*"!
yeah, also something I didn't realize back then
Cheers,
On Sun, 23 Aug 2020 at 00:43, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, 23 Aug 2020 at 05:55, Thibault Molleman <
> thibaultmolle...@gmail.com> wrote:
&g
:13, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 22. Aug 2020, at 09:25, Thibault Molleman
> wrote:
> >
> > So what's the consensus on an apartment building (way) that has
> mailboxes for each person who has an apartment the
nse to put it on the one node/way.
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020, 11:53 Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> Aug 22, 2020, 11:43 by andrew.harv...@gmail.com:
>
> On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 at 17:25, Thibault Molleman <
> thibaultmolle...@gmail
So what's the consensus on an apartment building (way) that has mailboxes
for each person who has an apartment there.
I've just been tagging those as:
addr:housenumber = A1;A2;A3;A4;A5;A6;A7;A8;A9;A10;A11
(Semicolon, because that's what the wiki recommends for multiple values
iirc)
On Thu, Aug
rting
> today, it will also be free to use for commercial users as well"
>
> For how long ? and free in exchange for what --- the ability to place
> cookies, track and target users/clients with advertisements & political
> messages ?
>
> Best regards,
>
While I'm not a fan of Facebook either.
If you play devils advocate. they have done some good stuff. and already
notice some good changes to mapilary as well:
- they have done some amazing work with 'map with AI'
- all the mapillary data is from now free to use, even for commercial use :
"Moving
I think that's a bad assumption to make. Could just be that nobody bothered
to tag it
On Sat, Feb 15, 2020, 21:17 John Sturdy wrote:
> I think that by default bollards are not removable, and that if a bollard
> is not tagged as removable, it is reasonable to assume it's not removable.
>
> On
Yeah, Also noticed that when mapping bollards. I'd vote on such a proposal
yeah
Not sure if proposals are needed for changes this small. But I'd love to
hear other people's feedback as well yeah
On Sat, 15 Feb 2020 at 19:54, Hauke Stieler wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> there's the "bollard" key with
Isn't layer= meant for what floor it's on.
(or are you thinking of bicycle_parking=two-tier (see bottom of the page
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle_parking )
On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 at 15:07, Florimond Berthoux <
florimond.berth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think it's not
I agree, was pretty confused when I saw that as well (after I had mapped a
bunch of regular parkings and then did some bicycle ones)
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020, 07:46 John Willis via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle_parking
>
> It lists
" A restaurant where the server fills up your bottle based on his or her
humor should not be tagged as part of the refill scheme. "
Maybe add a line to clarify that the sign requirement is specifically
regarding schemes. A place doesn't need a sign just to have the
"drinking_water:refill=yes" tag.
Hi,
Back in 2018 all countries in the European Union were forced to switch
their naming scheme for fuels at gas stations to the new E5/E10/B7 scheme
(referring to the amount of bio-ethanol in the fuel.
Sources:
http://www.flanderstoday.eu/petrol-98-and-95-labels-change-next-week
28 matches
Mail list logo
