Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

On 31/03/2023 07:10, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: I guess that in such cases it may be possible to tag it both as charging station and a charge point at the same time? That'd work - it makes it clear that this is a "new" amenity=charging_station (e.g. a "group of chargers", even if

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

On 31/03/2023 07:18, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: How you distinguish "marks group of chargers" and "marks single charger" within group of chargers" now? I don't, because currently it either marks "some chargers" (where there is no more detail) or "individual chargers" (where there

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

At the moment, the tagging scheme for charging station ask to indicate capacity (for number of charging point) and socket (for the type of socket like CCS or slower charging standard, and the respective number of each) and socket power (ex a ccs charger with 350 kW max power) is also indicated if

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

Mar 31, 2023, 01:53 by ajt1...@gmail.com: > On 30/03/2023 18:13, NKA mapper wrote: > >> tor. 30. mar. 2023 kl. 18:14 skrev Andy Townsend <>> >> ajt1...@gmail.com>> >: >> >>> >>> How do I know if an "amenity=charging_station" in theOSM >>> data is a "single charge

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

Mar 30, 2023, 18:14 by ajt1...@gmail.com: > On 30/03/2023 09:25, NKA mapper wrote: > >> The definition of >> amenity >> >> =>> charging_station >> >>  will >> change

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

fre. 31. mar. 2023 kl. 01:54 skrev Andy Townsend : > If the same tag must be used for both, the only way to tell "single charge > point" from "group of chargers" is to have a tag that is set to indicate > which is which. If "newtag=single" it means it's a single charge point, if > "newtag=group"

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

I think: A charging_station has one or more chargers. You cannot count the number of chargers by counting charging_stations. Since you can't assume that all charging_stations have their capacity (number of chargers) in a tag, nor that chargers are separately mapped (in addition, or standalone),

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

On 30/03/2023 18:13, NKA mapper wrote: tor. 30. mar. 2023 kl. 18:14 skrev Andy Townsend : How do I know if an "amenity=charging_station" in the OSM data is a "single charge point" or a "group of chargers"? The intention is to not have a difference. Both a single charger location and a

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

tor. 30. mar. 2023 kl. 18:14 skrev Andy Townsend : > How do I know if an "amenity=charging_station" in the OSM data is a > "single charge point" or a "group of chargers"? > The intention is to not have a difference. Both a single charger location and a multi-charger location is a place where you

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

On 30/03/2023 09:25, NKA mapper wrote: The definition of amenity =charging_station  will change slightly and will represent both locations with a single charge point and

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

tor. 30. mar. 2023 kl. 16:11 skrev Marc_marc : > For years we will end up with a tag with two meanings: the old and > the new and it will be impossible to review the old tag since part > of the new meaning (amenity=charging_station = a site of > man_made=charging_station) uses the same tag as the

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

Mar 30, 2023, 16:11 by marc_m...@mailo.com: > Le 30.03.23 à 12:43, Lionel Giard a écrit : > >> we use the same idea for amenity=fuel where it just shows the place where >> there is one or more fuel pump. >> > > in no case did amentiy=fuel designate a pump and then be changed > to designate

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

Mar 30, 2023, 10:50 by marc_m...@mailo.com: > Hello, > > Le 30.03.23 à 10:25, NKA mapper a écrit : > >> The definition of amenity=charging_station will change slightly and will >> represent both locations with a single charge point and locations with a >> group of chargers. A new optional

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

Le 30.03.23 à 12:43, Lionel Giard a écrit : we use the same idea for amenity=fuel where it just shows the place where there is one or more fuel pump. in no case did amentiy=fuel designate a pump and then be changed to designate all the pumps in the same location. it you really want to have

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

The idea behind clarifying the amenity=charging_station for a place where there is one or more charge points, is that we use the same idea for amenity=fuel where it just shows the place where there is one or more fuel pump. Also most of the time for charging station in my area, it was already

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

Hello, Le 30.03.23 à 10:25, NKA mapper a écrit : The definition of amenity=charging_station will change slightly and will represent both locations with a single charge point and locations with a group of chargers. A new optional feature, man_made=charge_point will be created to separate

[Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

Currently, some users create one amenity =charging_station node (or area) to represent a charging location, regardless of the number of charging points at the location. Other users