On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Alan Mintz
wrote:
> At 2009-12-22 11:59, Roy Wallace wrote:
>>I think Karlsruhe is still the best approach - e.g. even if you have
>>4, 6, 12, 18, 50, an even interpolation way from 4 to 50 is the best
>>you can do short of mapping each address individually.
>
> Ex
Alan Mintz wrote:
> At 2009-12-22 11:59, Roy Wallace wrote:
>> I think Karlsruhe is still the best approach - e.g. even if you have
>> 4, 6, 12, 18, 50, an even interpolation way from 4 to 50 is the best
>> you can do short of mapping each address individually.
>
> Except for this pesky line in th
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Alan Mintz
> wrote:
> At 2009-12-22 11:59, Roy Wallace wrote:
> >I think Karlsruhe is still the best approach - e.g. even if you have
> >4, 6, 12, 18, 50, an even interpolation way from 4 to 50 is the best
> >you can do short of mapping each address individually.
At 2009-12-22 11:59, Roy Wallace wrote:
>I think Karlsruhe is still the best approach - e.g. even if you have
>4, 6, 12, 18, 50, an even interpolation way from 4 to 50 is the best
>you can do short of mapping each address individually.
Except for this pesky line in the wiki page, which is what imp
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Alan Mintz
wrote:
>
>> The current scheme with
>>drawing a way to interpolate is too much work and cumbersome, for me
>>anyways.
>
> I agree it's cumbersome. The interval is not definite - only that it be at
> least 2 because of the spec of being odd on the north/
At 2009-12-22 02:07, Erik Johansson wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Alan Mintz
> wrote:
> > At 2009-12-21 11:01, Roy Wallace wrote:
> >>... If you don't know where the other end of the
> >>street is, you can't use an addr:interpolation way, so it seems to me
> >>that you are just tagging
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Alan Mintz
wrote:
> At 2009-12-21 11:01, Roy Wallace wrote:
>>... If you don't know where the other end of the
>>street is, you can't use an addr:interpolation way, so it seems to me
>>that you are just tagging a sign.
>>
>>Is there already a tagging scheme for th
At 2009-12-21 11:01, Roy Wallace wrote:
>... If you don't know where the other end of the
>street is, you can't use an addr:interpolation way, so it seems to me
>that you are just tagging a sign.
>
>Is there already a tagging scheme for this? If not, propose one - but
>(as others have said) don't u
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Erik Johansson wrote:
>
> Does anyone have any improvements to make this scheme better?
If you know where the other end of the street is, use an
addr:interpolation way, in accordance with the wiki. I think your case
was essentially why addr:interpolation was esta
2009/12/21 Erik Johansson
> But it is retrieved in the only way I care about namely the rendered
> map. It could be retrieved by geocoders as well, with small changes,
> it was this change I wanted help with. Note, place=locality seems even
> better after what you said, or do you have a better ta
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> 2009/12/21 Erik Johansson
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Frederik Ramm
>> wrote:
>> > Then why don't you use "place=locality, name=45-29" if that's all you
>> > want.
>>
>> Thanks, that's a good idea (if it works),
>
> what do
2009/12/21 Erik Johansson
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Frederik Ramm
> wrote:
> > Then why don't you use "place=locality, name=45-29" if that's all you
> want.
>
> Thanks, that's a good idea (if it works),
what do you mean by: if it works? All alternative ways to the well
established add
Erik Johansson wrote:
> Does anyone have any improvements to make this scheme better?
Yes: Choose key names for your scheme that aren't already in use and are
clearly different from existing keys.
That is, they shouldn't start with "addr:" - that prefix is commonly
used for tagging addresses in a
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 5:05 PM, David Earl wrote:
> On 21/12/2009 15:39, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> are you aware of JOSM-Presets and autocompletion? If you work in JOSM
>> and use the presets, the street, city and country-tags will be
>> autocompleted.
>
> Furthermore if you use JOSM's addres
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Erik Johansson wrote:
>> 1. I use addr:housenumbers, just to get numbers on the map. Even
>> though I don't follow the spec.
>
> Then why don't you use "place=locality, name=45-29" if that's all you want.
Thanks, that's a good idea (
On 21/12/2009 15:39, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> are you aware of JOSM-Presets and autocompletion? If you work in JOSM
> and use the presets, the street, city and country-tags will be
> autocompleted.
Furthermore if you use JOSM's addressing plugin, you don't have to type
the street name at all
2009/12/21 Erik Johansson
> Hi
>
> I've slowly started using addr:housenumbers, I'm not really interested
> in doing it according to the way the addr:* scheme work atm though..
> Because of the amount of work to enter data in that scheme.
are you aware of JOSM-Presets and autocompletion? If yo
Hi,
Erik Johansson wrote:
> 1. I use addr:housenumbers, just to get numbers on the map. Even
> though I don't follow the spec.
Then why don't you use "place=locality, name=45-29" if that's all you want.
> Does anyone have any improvements to make this scheme better?
Yes, use the same scheme tha
Hi
I've slowly started using addr:housenumbers, I'm not really interested
in doing it according to the way the addr:* scheme work atm though..
Because of the amount of work to enter data in that scheme.
Here are the things that I believe is different from the addr:* scheme..
1. I use addr:housen
19 matches
Mail list logo
