The proposal would benefit from additional attention to lite tagging, for
those not interested in the full level of detail.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Hi Bryce,
Did you mean you find the proposal a bit difficult to understand ?
Yes it is. Nevertheless, many of tagging is optional, I can edit the
document to show it in a more understandable way.
This proposal doesn't prevent mappers to map large overhead transmission
lines as landmark if they
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 1:46 PM, François Lacombe
francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu wrote:
You can send me any formal and constructive suggestion about that.
Vote will begin shortly. Stay tuned.
I've found the power proposal a bit much to follow...
... but have found it satisfying to map
Hi,
Please note the update of the power transmission proposal
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Power_transmission_refinement
1. Removing the man_made=pole / man_made=tower introduction
- Deeper work should be done both in power and telecommunication fields to
find a proper
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 9:38 PM, François Lacombe
Deprecating power=tower and power=pole was my first proposition.
Many people goes against it and then I refined the proposal.
For now I'm just introducing man_made=tower + tower:type=power to use it
when power=* is needed to describe hosted
Hi,
I can't open voting right now since some other points are still incomplete
(RFC outlined comments and it's time to find a solution).
Moreover, substation refinement vote is currently opened, one thing at a
time.
Be sure I'm willing to propose a good solution to the multiple power
instances
Andreas Labres wrote
On 21.09.13 21:16, Ole Nielsen wrote:
On 21/09/2013 21:01, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I continue to oppose the usage of man_made=tower for electricity lattice
towers (that what has been power=tower until now and which is 4,8
Million times in use). Why should we change
+1 using man_made=tower for all towers
Lets show that we are flexible enough and not that conservative to fix
mistakes even if they were made some years ago and if the are right now
an established method.
Am 21.09.2013 21:16, schrieb Ole Nielsen:
On 21/09/2013 21:01, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 22/set/2013 um 15:14 schrieb fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
+1 using man_made=tower for all towers
are electrical towers actual towers? Do you propose to also discourage the use
of water_tower? What do we gain?
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging
Am 22.09.2013 15:21, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
Am 22/set/2013 um 15:14 schrieb fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
+1 using man_made=tower for all towers
are electrical towers actual towers?
Considering tower:type=communication - Yes.
Do you propose to also discourage the use of
Am 22/set/2013 um 15:40 schrieb fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
P.s.: What about towers/poles for aerialways ?
I wouldn't tag them as man_made=tower
I wouldn't tag every antenna as tower neither, but of course there are
communication towers (e.g. there are some famous ones for tv).
2013/9/22 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
Am 22/set/2013 um 15:40 schrieb fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
P.s.: What about towers/poles for aerialways ?
I wouldn't tag them as man_made=tower
I introduce man_made=pole if you want ;)
*François Lacombe*
francois dot
On 22 September 2013 15:34, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
I wouldn't tag them as man_made=tower
Me neither. The typical large metal framework structures for carrying
high-voltage electricity cables would be unlikely to be called towers
in normal British English language
Oggetto: Re: [Tagging] Power tower and pole usefulness
On 22 September 2013 15:34, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
I wouldn't tag them as man_made=tower
Me neither. The typical large metal framework structures for carrying
high-voltage electricity cables would be unlikely
2013/9/22 Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com
so if we have to use something
under man_made, I'd go for man_made=pylon.
Why not.
It's even better than power=tower IMHO.
2013/9/22 alessandro zardo bredy...@yahoo.it
what is lattice framework structure can I see a
It's like this.
http://wharferj.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/electricity-pylons-001.jpg
But this for me are tower.
and about minor_line?
minor_line should be deprecated by power transmission refinement.
But It's a proposal not yet approved
___
2013/9/22 alessandro zardo bredy...@yahoo.it
minor_line should be deprecated by power transmission refinement.
But It's a proposal not yet approved
All what we are discussing about, right now, is how things will go once
this proposal would has been accepted.
Even if we have minor_line
Am 22/set/2013 um 21:10 schrieb François Lacombe
francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu:
All what we are discussing about, right now, is how things will go once this
proposal would has been accepted.
you would need an extraordinary vote to deprecate power=tower ;-)
Deprecating power=tower and power=pole was my first proposition.
Many people goes against it and then I refined the proposal.
For now *I'm just introducing man_made=tower* + tower:type=power to use it
when power=* is needed to describe hosted devices.
Thus, man_made=tower doesn't seem to be the
dieterdreist wrote
I continue to oppose the usage of man_made=tower for electricity lattice
towers
+1
The wiki page [1] currently states consistently in English and German that a
man_made=tower is a solid building while girder frameworks are
man_made=mast.
A tower is a building. It makes
Hi,
Since the last discussions about that topic this summer, the choice has
been made to introduce man_made=tower and man_made=pole as an equivalent to
power=tower or power=pole in the power transmission refinement proposal.
2013/9/21 François Lacombe francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu
Nevertheless, using man_made=tower requires to add an extra tag to give
the usefulness of the tower.
tower:type=* is usually used to give this information.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tower:type#Tower_types
Some power
On 21/09/2013 21:01, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I continue to oppose the usage of man_made=tower for electricity lattice
towers (that what has been power=tower until now and which is 4,8
Million times in use). Why should we change this well established
practise, which would require 4,8 Million
23 matches
Mail list logo
