Agreed, public transport is certainly the exception here.
Yves
Le 31 mars 2020 04:21:25 GMT+02:00, Gegorian Hauser a
écrit :
>___
>Tagging mailing list
>Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Hello,
iD giving a message about all types of aerialway tations to add there the public transport tagging.
For me the public transport tagging should not be addet to a winter sport aerialway.
Winter sport areas main function it to having fun and not to transport people.
Also iD is
I’ve added a ticket to the side report:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/2573
--
Andrew
From: Andrew Hain
Sent: 29 March 2020 11:19
To: Sarah Hoffmann ; Tag discussion, strategy and related
tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Route names
On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 at 12:33, Paul Allen wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 at 10:42, Sarah Hoffmann wrote:
>
>> * section_name (section? stage? leg?)
>>
>
> Segment? Just a thought.
>
> Might be a bit too much baggage in that term?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Segment
Yves:
> We should be able to follow Richard's proposal and re-tag names in name=* and
> references in ref=* and filling itinerary, operator, etc... along the way.
If I have a long foot trail, divided into 20 legs, should the leg route
relations get the name tag of the trail? On the ground, some
Am Mo., 30. März 2020 um 01:11 Uhr schrieb Kevin Kenny <
kevin.b.ke...@gmail.com>:
> One example: Berkeley Square in London. In form, it's a public garden,
> but even the English designate it a town square. As I understand it, an
> Englishman would not raise eyebrows at a sentence: "Winston
Le 30 mars 2020 08:25:40 GMT+02:00, Peter Elderson a
écrit :
>
>Note that not all renderings currently show the name or ref of the
>parent trail relation,...
Inevitably, the current situation is stained by the abilities of the actual
renderer, and the other way around.
Maybe those renderers
Hey,
a new RFC for
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Unifying-playground-equipment-tagging
Purpose:
Simplified tagging of playground equipment on the playground itself or
as separate object. Both schemes already exist and I want to combine
them to help to decrease tagging
The current system seems to make sense.
If you have a leisure=playground feature, probably mapped as an area,
you can tag it with a list of tags like "playground:slide=yes",
"playground:swing=yes", to show what equipment is available.
If you want to map a slide or a swing as a separate feature,
Am Mo., 30. März 2020 um 16:45 Uhr schrieb Sören Reinecke via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org>:
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Unifying-playground-equipment-tagging
>
>
> Proposal:
> I propose the key playground to be deprecated and the use of key
> playground:*
sent from a phone
> On 30. Mar 2020, at 20:03, Sören Reinecke via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/137931618 . In this case
> Key:playground was used to tag playground equipment on the playground
> object itself. But for such cases we use Key:playground:* .
Às 05:08 de 30/03/2020, Martin Koppenhoefer escreveu:
Am Mo., 30. März 2020 um 01:11 Uhr schrieb Kevin Kenny
mailto:kevin.b.ke...@gmail.com>>:
One example: Berkeley Square in London. In form, it's a public
garden, but even the English designate it a town square. As I
understand
> The current system seems to make sense.
It makes sense but it seems that it is also much error-prone because it
is easy to oversee one sentence in the wiki of Key:playground:* and
Key:playground that makes the difference (pointing the case where the
key should be applied)
> If you have a
On 30.03.2020 20:02, Sören Reinecke via Tagging wrote:
>> How will that help? What errors are you commonly finding?
>
> For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/137931618 . In this case
> Key:playground was used to tag playground equipment on the playground
> object itself. But for such
On 30.03.2020 20:02, Sören Reinecke via Tagging wrote:
>> How will that help? What errors are you commonly finding?
>
> For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/137931618 . In this case
> Key:playground was used to tag playground equipment on the playground
> object itself. But for such
> Well the equipment in this case is playground=sandpit.
As the outline of the sandpit is identical with the outline of the
leisure=playground, why would
this be wrong?
Theoretically you need to create an object for the playground itself
and another object for the playground equipment. Both then
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 4:09 AM Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> The thing is that squares often also serve as addresses and can be somehow
> seen very similar to streets, so the same as you can live in a street
> (meaning you live in a house on this street), you could also live on a square
> (a
AFAIK in Belgium, you can get all medicins for your pets from any pharmacy.
In addition, some vets have a small supply of often used medicins that
they can sell.
Perhaps some of the larger veterinary clinics have a separate counter
where you can only get medicins for animals. If you want to map
18 matches
Mail list logo
