Wow, I only asked about using the single line/minor_line distinction; if this
one isn't easy at all, what will it be by adding importance or usage, which
seems far less obvious than minor_line/line, itself not as obvious as I thought
at first? The current disctinction has the advantage it can
Thanks for the full story, Lauri. I understand now why the subject seems so
sensitive to some. I retain from your story, if I correctly understood it
that:* the current usage of minor_line/line is the one I previously suggested:
use minor_line for lines mainly on poles and line for lines mainly
In fact, this problem leaded me to my question: I noticed some minor lines
tagged as power=line, cluttering the Mapnik rendering, so I searched the
correct way of modelling them, to see if it was a rendering or modelling issue,
and one thing leading to another…
Regarding the parting between
David Marchal wrote:
> I saw conflicting points of view regarding the difference between these two
> ways for modelling aerial power lines: some say that it is the voltage which
> matters, others say that it's the visibility difference that matters, others
Hi.
To properly understand this issue,
2015-10-15 11:31 GMT+02:00 Éric Gillet :
> If the height of a mountain define its importante, simply use the 'ele=*'
> attribute to sort them, no need for another subjective 'importante' tag.
on a side note, it is not simple as that, because a peak is just local, the
On 2015-10-15 09:29, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote :
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> Am 14.10.2015 um 23:49 schrieb André Pirard :
>>
>> Under the thread "château" I pointed out that there are buildings that can
>> be called château ≃ castle and that are not historic at all.
>
>
> On Oct 14, 2015, at 10:35 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
>
>
> Oxford dictionary describes kiln as
> "a furnace or oven for burning, baking, or drying, esp. one for calcining
> lime or firing pottery."
We should really separate things used to prepare foods and things used
>
> > On Oct 15, 2015, at 4:02 AM, François Lacombe
> wrote:
> >
> > importance=*
>
> That word is not allowed over in -carto github, no matter how relevant or
> useful - like with mountains or regional features that need to shown at
> varying z levels based on...
> On Oct 15, 2015, at 4:27 PM, Volker Schmidt wrote:
>
> Another famous example: Hearst Castle [1]
> I think the "historic" key is correct.
>
+1
Hearst castle is definitely historic, its on several historic records.
My parent's house in California, built in 1922 out of
2015-10-15 11:31 GMT+02:00 Éric Gillet :
>
> If the height of a mountain define its importance, simply use the 'ele=*'
> attribute to sort them, no need for another subjective 'importance' tag.
>
Sorry for typos in my previous email, I meant 'importance' and not
Another famous example: Hearst Castle [1]
I think the "historic" key is correct.
This is what Google proposes as definition and synonyms:
adjective: historic
1.
famous or important in history, or potentially so.
"we are standing on a historic site"
synonyms:significant
> On Oct 15, 2015, at 4:02 AM, François Lacombe
> wrote:
>
> importance=*
That word is not allowed over in -carto github, no matter how relevant or
useful - like with mountains or regional features that need to shown at varying
z levels based on... Importance.
Javbw
> On Oct 15, 2015, at 12:11 AM, David Marchal wrote:
>
> Do you mean that the landscape impact criteria is already the one used to
> distinguish minor_line and line?
I think he means that there is usually a huge difference in voltage and line
type between lines on
There are 2 pages related to horse riding actiities [1] in English, [2] in
German. They do not have the same content. The German page mentions
amenity=stables+sport=equestrian (for sport competions) as well as
building=riding_school (for learning how to ride)
regards
m
[1]
David Marchal writes:
> Thanks for the full story, Lauri. I understand now why the subject
> seems so sensitive to some. I retain from your story, if I correctly
> understood it that:* the current usage of minor_line/line is the one I
> previously suggested: use minor_line for
Javbw
On Oct 15, 2015, at 6:31 PM, Éric Gillet wrote:
>> > On Oct 15, 2015, at 4:02 AM, François Lacombe
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > importance=*
>>
>> That word is not allowed over in -carto github, no matter how relevant or
>> useful -
Hi all,
forgive me if this was discussed before:
There seems to be a need to map highways which do not exist.
I understand the idea that we map highway=proposed / highway=planned
as this might be used to visualize a plan, I can also understand that we
have tags like highway=dismantled and
Seems to be a hot item in the equestrian world:
https://www.google.com/search?q=menage+manege=menage+manege=chrome..69i57j69i60.6298j0j7=chrome_sm=0=UTF-8
Management summary is that manège is correct (it is the proper french
word), menage really means something different (household or
Do you have any examples?
On Oct 15, 2015 12:27 PM, "Mateusz Konieczny" wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:35:08 +
> Gerd Petermann wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > forgive me if this was discussed before:
> > There seems to be a need to map
Javbw
> On Oct 16, 2015, at 3:49 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
> t least the intention was to build a castle, the typology is copying
> from castles, Hearst ruled an imperium (of publishing), he organized
> impressive receptions, held formal dinners, etc. --- for
On 2015-10-15 20:54, Holger Mappt wrote:
Hi,
The post_box:type Wiki page [1] was created two months ago and the key
was added to the JOSM preset recently [2]. That means that the values
show up in Launchpad for translation. The "meter" type in particular is
hard to translate as it is not clear
On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 21:14 +0200, Marc Zoutendijk wrote:
>
> > Op 15 okt. 2015, om 19:43 heeft Philip Barnes > > het volgende geschreven:
> >
> > On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 16:49 +0100, Dave F. wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > >
The French wiki seems to be very clear:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Riding
What the picture shows is a Carrière, which is to be tagged as
leisure=pitch
sport=equestrian
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Hi,
The post_box:type Wiki page [1] was created two months ago and the key
was added to the JOSM preset recently [2]. That means that the values
show up in Launchpad for translation. The "meter" type in particular is
hard to translate as it is not clear for non-UK citizens like me what
that
On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 21:54 +0200, Holger Mappt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The post_box:type Wiki page [1] was created two months ago and the
> key
> was added to the JOSM preset recently [2]. That means that the values
> show up in Launchpad for translation. The "meter" type in particular
> is
> hard to
Oops, forgot to set the list on cc
Von: Gerd Petermann
Gesendet: Freitag, 16. Oktober 2015 07:21
An: Hans De Kryger
Betreff: AW: [Tagging] how to tag a "highway" that doesn't exist?
Example:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5987185
which is just the first
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:35:08 +
Gerd Petermann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> forgive me if this was discussed before:
> There seems to be a need to map highways which do not exist.
> I understand the idea that we map highway=proposed / highway=planned
> as this might
> Op 15 okt. 2015, om 19:43 heeft Philip Barnes het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 16:49 +0100, Dave F. wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> http://www.martincollins.com/Portals/0/Images/menage-surfaces/menage-surface-martin-collins.jpg
>>
>> I'm trying to find an
28 matches
Mail list logo