On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 9:38 AM John Willis via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> I still dislike this, as it defines parking for a horse or camel or
> something found in the equestrian=* tag.
>
Why? Hitch just means fasten to. So it's a post that you can fasten
something to. You ca
Javbw
> On Aug 21, 2019, at 12:15 AM, Jmapb via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> hitching_post
I still dislike this, as it defines parking for a horse or camel or something
found in the equestrian=* tag.
I really like lead_hook - as it implies:
- it's a hook for a leashed pet
- it's a hook for a ro
TagInfo actually shows 29 counts of amenity=dog_parking. I’ve only seen
designated spots for dogs. Leaving a cat there might not be safe for either
animal.
Ant
> 20 авг. 2019 г., в 16:15, Jmapb via Tagging
> написал(а):
>
>> On 8/20/2019 4:57 AM, Andrew Davidson wrote:
>> On 20/8/19 6:24 pm
On 8/20/2019 4:57 AM, Andrew Davidson wrote:
On 20/8/19 6:24 pm, John Willis via Tagging wrote:
So let's standardize on a tag:
amenity=hitching_post
hitching_post=dog ?
Interestingly, one of the items they sell is a green 30x30cm marker
to go on the sidewalk in front of the pole - lite
sent from a phone
> On 20. Aug 2019, at 16:53, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Most farmland is fenced off, for one reason
> or another (to stop livestock wandering off or to stop idiots wandering in).
it is country (or even region) specific, in Germany no, in (central) Italy
fences are common, but I
Andy Townsend :
>
>> On 19/08/2019 19:04, Peter Elderson wrote:
>>
>> Ok, I accept I just don't know how it's done. So how is that done? How do I
>> tell my Garmin to guide me along, say, the Limes trail through the
>> Netherlands?
> Essentially, you'd just look at the screen and follow that!
On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 15:37, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> From what I have learnt through OpenStreetMap and discussions about other
> countries like the US (trespassing), the UK, the situation in Italy, it
> seems this is rather an exception than the standard though.
>
As with everything in r
sent from a phone
> On 20. Aug 2019, at 12:48, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Other
> countries may do it differently, but here public footpaths are marked and
> even local walking
> clubs don't use routes which are not public footpaths unless the landowner
> has given
> explicit permission (in which
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 7:42 AM Andy Townsend wrote:
> Where Garmin on-device routing is really useful is for when you need to get
> to somewhere but don't have an on-screen route to follow - for example if the
> weather's turned and you need to abort a previously planned route and get
> anothe
On 19/08/2019 19:04, Peter Elderson wrote:
Ok, I accept I just don't know how it's done. So how is that done? How
do I tell my Garmin to guide me along, say, the Limes trail through
the Netherlands?
Essentially, you'd just look at the screen and follow that! I tend to
use waypoints for an
On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 08:50, s8evq wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 14:34:20 +0100, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> > > A map with copyright permitting OSM to make use of its data. There are
> > several walks near me which appear on maps published by the county
> council or tourist board.
> > Copyright
On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 11:17, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
[editors and/or mappers]
I think some separate a way and insert a new roundabout .. the new
> roundabout does not go into the relations.
>
This is the sort of problem that iD could cause, a year or two ago. You
could delete or
d
Richard Fairhurst :
> Kenny:
> > I do want editors minimally to observe the 'don't break the route'
> > principle. About 80% of the broken-route problem can be solved
> > simply by, "when splitting a way, both the pieces become members
> > of any route relations in which the original way appeared,
On 20/08/19 18:38, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Kevin Kenny wrote:
There's also something to be said for using the ugly editors to
prove the concept, because at this point, we don't yet know how
to do everything, much less how to make it novice-friendly! The
exception is simple linear routes, and Sa
On 20/08/19 19:14, Andrew Davidson wrote:
Thank you gentlemen, that has made my day. Maybe JOSM is the A10 of
editors. It's old, it gets no respect, and it's as ugly as sin. Yet it
still does the job better than everything else.
Not sure what type of planes the other editors are.
For train
That is exactly what I described: you have a route i.e. a chain of ways to
follow. But OsmAnd cannot do that! It can access the route and show it on
the map, but it does not use it for navigation. So you have to first turn
it into a string of points (gpx), losing the connection to the map and the
w
Thank you gentlemen, that has made my day. Maybe JOSM is the A10 of
editors. It's old, it gets no respect, and it's as ugly as sin. Yet it
still does the job better than everything else.
Not sure what type of planes the other editors are.
On 20/8/19 1:55 am, Kevin Kenny wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19
On 20/8/19 6:24 pm, John Willis via Tagging wrote:
So let's standardize on a tag:
amenity=hitching_post
hitching_post=dog ?
Interestingly, one of the items they sell is a green 30x30cm marker to
go on the sidewalk in front of the pole - literally a sign for the
designated spot for dog
Kevin Kenny wrote:
> There's also something to be said for using the ugly editors to
> prove the concept, because at this point, we don't yet know how
> to do everything, much less how to make it novice-friendly! The
> exception is simple linear routes, and Sarah or I can give you
> algorithms
>
>
> On 6/18/2019 10:14 AM, Paul Allen wrote:
>>
>> So let's standardize on a tag:
Thanks for working on this.
Here are two pictures I took for a common type of lead hook I see here in
Japan. I can upload a better one to the wiki when there is a page for this tag.
https://imgur.com/galler
On 20/08/19 17:48, s8evq wrote:
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 14:34:20 +0100, Paul Allen wrote:
A map with copyright permitting OSM to make use of its data. There are
several walks near
me which appear on maps published by the county council or tourist board.
Copyright does
not permit me to make use
Thanks for the help. It wasn't clear to me before. I now moved the page to
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Tagging_scheme_for_hiking_and_foot_route_relations.
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 12:45:04 +0100, Paul Allen wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 12:17, s8evq wrote:
>
> >
> > Perhaps goin
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 14:34:20 +0100, Paul Allen wrote:
> > A map with copyright permitting OSM to make use of its data. There are
> several walks near
> me which appear on maps published by the county council or tourist board.
> Copyright does
> not permit me to make use of those maps. However
I would like to briefly add my opinion on the sorting of relations question:
To be clear: my experience is mostly with short roundtrip hiking/walking
relations in Flanders
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Local_Walking_Routes_Flanders#Local_Walking_Routes_in_Flanders).
I
On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 01:00:47 +0200, Peter Elderson wrote:
> The osm route IS the route, and it should be usable as is, without redoing
> the routing.
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding you, but couldn't you do that in OsmAnd? Take the
GPX from a hiking route and import in Osmand. Set your destin
25 matches
Mail list logo
