That is exactly what I described: you have a route i.e. a chain of ways to follow. But OsmAnd cannot do that! It can access the route and show it on the map, but it does not use it for navigation. So you have to first turn it into a string of points (gpx), losing the connection to the map and the ways. Then import that into OsmAnd. The OsmAnd combines that with the map again, to turn the track (list of points) back into a route (list of ways you began with) for navigation. Am I the only one to find this a bit odd?
Fr gr Peter Elderson Op di 20 aug. 2019 om 09:25 schreef s8evq <s8...@runbox.com>: > > > On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 01:00:47 +0200, Peter Elderson <pelder...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > The osm route IS the route, and it should be usable as is, without > redoing the routing. > > > > Perhaps I'm misunderstanding you, but couldn't you do that in OsmAnd? Take > the GPX from a hiking route and import in Osmand. Set your destination in > Osmand, start navigation, and under options, go for "GPX route - Choose > track file to follow" and choose your imported GPX. OsmAnd wil give you > turn by turn instructions, along the GPX. > (I have to be honest, doesn't work 100% perfectly. Perhaps bad quality > GPX? I didn't test it enough.) > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
