On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 at 23:55, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> 1) Holiday cottages are rarely building=cabin, they are mostly
> building=house.
>
May depend on where you are? I know of a number of places that advertise
cottages / cabins eg http://lyrebirdspringbrook.com/index.html
One around the corner
On Wed, 23 Dec 2020 at 01:49, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> I suggest that, when we get around to looking at pools, we consider
> the possibility of adding other angling considerations
>
Carrying on from those, there are other named river features such as Bend &
Reach, which we currently have no way of
Thanks Brian.
As far as I am concerned, those changes are fine.
Graeme
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 at 10:53, Brian M. Sperlongano
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently received late feedback on the hazards proposal. Based on the
> feedback, I felt it was necessary to make small changes to this proposal.
>
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 at 21:41, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
> What I don't like in OSM is naming for large geographic areas,
Thanks for the explanation, Frederik, but I'd like to make a couple of
points
like "the Alps", "the Black Forest", or "the Bay of Biscay", for two
> reasons:
>
> First, there
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 at 21:28, Paul Allen wrote:
> I can't think of an English term, other than "holiday cottages." These
> places
> generally call themselves "Foo Holiday Cottages" or "Foo Holidays" or
> "Foo Farm Cottages" or things like that.
>
I'm with Paul for Holiday Cottages.
How about
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 at 06:37, stevea wrote:
> This is problematic to my thinking. In California (my state), at an
> UNCONTROLLED intersection (no traffic_signal, stop sign, other traffic
> control device...), for example where the sidewalk "would continue to
> another sidewalk on the other side
On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 at 19:17, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> fully spelt out
>
Noted.
Thanks
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 at 02:24, Seth Deegan wrote:
> Those are known as rumble strips.
>
> The wiki has traffic_calming=rumble_strip:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_calming#Common_values
>
But the description for rumble strip on that page also says "Do not confuse
with
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 12:43, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> That example certainly looks like a landuse=basin or water=basin feature
> with basin=retention
>
Maybe? But there's an awful lot of them tagged as reservoirs!
Thanks
Graeme
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 6:23 PM Gra
On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 17:55, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> How objects tagged now with amenity=lifeboat_station should be tagged
> after this proposal passes?
>
They were a late addition after somebody pointed out that they exist. They
would be replaced
On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 19:01, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> On 20. Dec 2020, at 05:43, Graeme Fitzpatrick
> wrote:
>
> The existing emergency <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:emergency>
> =disaster_response
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag
There has been concern raised on the talk page over the "If it's illegal,
please don't map" warning that I included in the proposal.
I put it there due to that issue being mentioned on several military
related pages, but also noticed that there are a few different wording of
it eg
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 at 09:32, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> its presence does not even tell in every case that you can exercise the
> sport at an object with this tag. E.g.
> shop=sports
> sport=surfing
>
What would you suggest then for a shop that sells surfboards eg
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 at 09:35, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> is this referring to British law?
>
Not that I'm aware of (or Australian for that matter!), but I have seen
comments on various pages that it is illegal for people in both Israel &
Russia to map the location of military bases, &, of
ame)" to the list.
>
> Many people might not be reading every email in the RFC thread, but do
> want to know when voting is open, so a new thread makes it more visible.
>
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 14:33, Graeme Fitzpatrick
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On S
Just to make sure everybody is aware, voting is now open on the
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Rescue_Stations
proposal.
Any questions or comments are still welcome, either here, the original
Proposal thread (
On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 15:30, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
>
> I think the best option is to deprecate water=pond and suggest using
> water=lake for natural lakes, even small ones,
>
No, I don't agree, sorry.
Same as the difference between rivers & streams, there is a difference
between lakes &
On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 06:06, stevea wrote:
> let's take that off-list. Those would be appropriate to discuss ON list,
> it's true, and maybe you publish the RESULTS of our off-list discussion
> here after we've emailed each other. But I feel we have spent a great deal
> of time (and passion!)
On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 at 20:27, Sven Geggus
wrote:
> While the wiki clearly states that capacity means people a lot of mappers
> seem to think that the number of camp-pitches is meant.
>
> The problem is, that both numbers seem to make sense on different types of
> camp-sites. While the (maximum)
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 00:22, Tobias Zwick wrote:
>
> https://westnordost.de/misc/2or1lanes.jpg
>
> It is a residential road marked clearly for 2 lanes, so it seems obvious
> to tag it with lanes=2. But on the other hand, you'll notice that there
> are parking cars on the right side that
I was having similar thoughts just a couple of days ago, about what to call
a pile of rocks that a farmer has cleared from, then piled up in, a field?
natural=bare_rock says it's exposed bedrock
=scree has fallen from an adjacent rockface
=shingle is on a beach or river bed
=stone is for large
On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 at 08:41, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> Looking at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cairn it seems that it is
> something more purposefully constructed than
> "pile of unwanted stones kept in one place"
>
Yes, that's what I thought
A while back, we had a discussion / proposal about mapping steps as an
area, so that each step was mapped.
Would that concept work here?
Thanks
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 at 20:49, Robert Delmenico wrote:
> Thank you all for the discussion around changing the tag man_made.
>
> After careful consideration I have decided to abandon this proposal
>
Probably the best, because it tried to go too far in one go.
- mostly because the fact that the
On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 at 04:34, Anders Torger wrote:
>
> ** Due to limitations in area-based name tagging the map looks empty
> just when zoomed out a little, as names disappear almost directly, so
> despite detailed mapping and tagging the overview map is not as useful
> as it could be. While the
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 at 16:22, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> Tagging 25 tourism=chalet independently is sill when they form
> single object, not 25 separate ones.
>
Are they cottages number 1 - 25 on the same camp site, or individual
chalets located close
On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 01:25, Niels Elgaard Larsen wrote:
> Volker Schmidt:
> > Be careful: oneway=* is a legal access tag, only valid for vehicles, not
> for pedestrians.
>
>
> We do have a lot of highway=footway,oneway=yes
>
Also know of suspended Tree Walk walkways e.g.
On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 16:22, Volker Schmidt wrote:
> The problem is that we frequently have cycleways or food-cycle-ways that
> are legally oneway for cyclists, but not for pedestrians. They are tagged
> "oneway=yes". I agree we need a oneway tag for pedestrians, but it cannot
> be a simple
Not arguing, but
oneway:foot = 5024
foot:backward = 394
foot:forward = 300
Personally, I would interpret that as time that the wiki had a rewrite! :-)
Thanks
Graeme
On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 19:19, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> On 11 Sep 2023, a
On Tue, 27 Sept 2022 at 02:10, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> What about universities where future sailors/pilots are training
> (often these are military schools).
>
They should then be under military=base + base_function=training
Thanks
Graeme
On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 at 23:58, Casper Kersten
wrote
> All this said, I do appreciate good quality proposals and constructive
> discussions. I'm happy with all these creative proposals that are being put
> forward.
>
As do I, but I get a bit concerned when RFCs / proposals are raised for
On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 at 05:58, Andy Townsend wrote:
> There are a few dozen examples in taginfo:
>
> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=tinting#values
>
> I'd pick one of those examples.
>
Thanks, Andy!
I tried searching for that & couldn't find anything? Must have been doing
something
How do you tag businesses doing window tinting for either cars or building
windows?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Window_film
Some of the options seem to be shop=window_blind or craft=sun_protection
but neither of them excite me!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dwindow_blind
Just created https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dwindow_tinting
As always, all comments are welcome.
Thanks
Graeme
PS & apparently just made my 1000th edit to the Wiki!
On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 at 14:46, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> Oct 21,
On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 at 18:23, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> you’ll have to wait a long time until the water becomes cold and can be
> drunken.
>
That one is a comment that stood out to me?
Is the water in your "drinking fountains" chilled, or is it just the
natural temperature of the water
In Australia, we encourage mappers not to use the town/city, State, or
postcode fields at all when entering addresses!
All they need to enter is the unit number (if applicable & known), street
number & street name.
Thanks
Graeme
On Sun, 25 Sept 2022 at 18:40, Andrew Hain
wrote:
> Clearly
On Tue, 4 Oct 2022 at 22:51, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> Can we mark it as deprecated and recommend not using it?
>
Yep, I'd be happy with that.
On Wed, 5 Oct 2022 at 04:59, Jass Kurn wrote:
>
> I've just noticed there is a bubbler tag being promoted?
On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 at 17:42, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> are all military tags about current use by the military, or maybe they can
> also be used for military installations that aren’t used currently? Is a
> military base that is now abandoned still a military base? Or a bunker?What
> are
gender=any?
Thanks
Graeme
On Wed, 5 Oct 2022 at 21:21, martianfreeloader
wrote:
> In the discussion of the Gender proposal, I noted that I find it strange
> to use the term "unisex" for "gender-neutral" or "all-gender" (as sex
> and gender are different properties).
>
> Proposal:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2022 at 22:00, Davidoskky via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> With all these tags, there is still no way to properly describe a place
> with a pipe that provides water which is not drinkable and not decorative.
>
Throwing another one into the mix - taps in camp
On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 at 23:28, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> Maybe there would be value in deapproving historic=battlefield
>
I would love to be able to move the vast majority of military= to
historic=military, as they are no longer military installations.
On Mon, 10 Oct 2022 at 19:19, Davidoskky via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> Would simply style work?
>
Don't think it really needs anything more than you said earlier:
amenity=fountain + fountain=decorative / utility / drinking
should cover it?
Thanks
Graeme
On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 at 01:15, Marc_marc wrote:
>
> Standardization is a good thing for quality but it is often a difficult
> exercise, especially when the previous tags mix several pieces of
> information into one, as is the case here
>
Especially when you consider that we now have at least 7
On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 at 19:01, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> or reply to this posting with link of freely licensed image, preferably
> already
> uploaded to Wikimedia Commons
>
How about this one, although it is more of a fountain than a tap.
Wondering if one solution for continually running "fountain" vs a start /
stop tap, would be a simple ?
Thanks
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Sat, 8 Oct 2022 at 16:04, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As for the pipe ... does it have a tap, or does it flow constantly? Bore
> water? Spring water?
>
Sorry, forgot about this one.
One camping ground that I'm thinking of, that we visit frequently, water is
pumped from the creek
What do they say about great minds, Steve? :-)
Thanks
Graeme
On Sun, 9 Oct 2022 at 16:43, stevea wrote:
> On Oct 8, 2022, at 11:31 PM, stevea wrote:
> > Yes, taps CAN be drinking water, but not necessarily are. For example,
> a hose_bib on a residence's "backyard porch" might be designed
On Sun, 9 Oct 2022 at 16:36, stevea wrote:
>
> > Disagree, some are are the same feature .. taps can be drinking water ..
> or 'not suitable for drinking' (legal CYA?), 'recommend you boil' (more
> CYA?), and 'not suitable for drinking' (you really would not drink this
> stuff, just look and
On Mon, 10 Oct 2022 at 10:13, stevea wrote:
>
> > replace man_made=water_tap with tap=yes and I subscribe. Also remove the
> redundant drinking_water=yes, it is implied by amenity=drinking_water
>
> This makes a lot of sense; +1.
>
Yep!
Thanks
Graeme
On Mon, 10 Oct 2022 at 10:12, stevea wrote:
> Yes, I'm glad to hear this: somebody refusing a 500€ bill / invoice with
> a 500€ note would simply make me leave the note on the table (counter, hand
> of the proprietor, if s/he let me...) and walk away, my obligation to
> remunerate fully and
On Sun, 2 Oct 2022 at 10:05, Davidoskky via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> >> I'll add to this list all those taps that can be activated without a
> direct manipulation of an object, such as passing your hand in front of a
> light ray which causes the water to start flowing.
> >
On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 at 09:01, Mike Thompson wrote:
>
> Agree it should be deleted or at least modified.
>
On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 at 09:19, stevea wrote:
> I'll go this: "A water tap is a human-made construction providing access
> to potable water" and leave out "supplied by centralized water
On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 at 09:32, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> I would not expect https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Bubbler.jpg
> to be a water tap, but I am not a native speaker.
>
Yes, quite definitely a water tap!
How you would then distinguish
>
On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 at 09:37, stevea wrote:
> I haven't heard a wider chime-in to my emphasis on "potable" (drinkable,
> if you prefer) but I think many of us mean that with a water_tap, even if
> we don't say it, I think we should.
>
I'm not sure if we should define that all taps are
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 at 20:10, Davidoskky via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> I don't think the wall is so important frankly, but let's assume we agree
> on that.
>
> This fountain has the wall and thus is decorative and is amenity=fountain.
>
>
>
I would say that regardless of how it's operated - turn handle, push
button, lever, foot pedal, auto sensor etc - that if water comes out, it's
a tap!
Thanks
Graeme
On Tue, 27 Sept 2022 at 23:20, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> Sep 27, 2022, 14:58 by
On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 18:29, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would not tag a bubbler as a tap.
>
These were the bubblers that we grew up with at school
Two more questions re the wiki.
" A water tap is a man-made construction providing access to water, *supplied
by centralized water distribution system*" - how about taps connected to
rain-water tanks? That part of that sentence should be deleted.
&
" Note that fountain
On Wed, 28 Sept 2022 at 03:03, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> Is
>
> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Beim_Kiosk_(Anlagage_Sihlh%C3%B6lzli).jpg
> man_made=water_tap
> or
> man_made=drinking_fountain
>
> Personally, I would call that one a decorative
Would this get around the problem of sea / oceans not being named e.g.:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/query?lat=-28.0675=153.4939#map=14/-28.0666/153.4835
, is part of the Coral Sea section of the Pacific Ocean, but comes up as
nothing found.
Thanks
Graeme
On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 at 12:58, Brian M.
New proposal done:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/emergency%3Dwater_rescue
Hopefully, the controversial bits have now been removed?
Thanks
Graeme
On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 22:55, Andy Townsend wrote:
> On 04/01/2023 06:16, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
> >
> >
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 at 18:14, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> is this thought for places where emergency aircraft is located or should
> it also be applied to places which are merely used for administration or
> training?
>
Was really only thinking of the operational side of things.
Thanks
Tried asking about this on the Community but no response so I'll bring it
out here.
In the process of clearing Notes & found one referring to this business:
https://moretongroup.com/ It’s a private business that does first aid
training, but also provides ambulances to attend sporting events, does
On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 00:21, Nate Wessel wrote:
> Would anyone object to an attempt to better cross-reference and
> distinguish these categories?
>
That's always a good idea! :-)
Thanks
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 22:33, Philip Barnes wrote:
> That would be very misleading, these are not the normal public ambulance
> service crewed by paramedics who you contact in an emergency.
>
> There is one locally who provide patient transport between hospitals for
> the NHS. I would go with a
On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 at 02:44, Illia Marchenko
wrote:
>
> Maybe *storage_tank=open *or similar.
>
I think this one may be the simplest solution.
Thanks
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 at 14:19, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> New proposal done:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/emergency%3Dwater_rescue
>
Everything is quiet! :-)
Does that mean that people are happy with how it looks?
Thank
Hi all & welcome back to the New Year!
With Christmas over, & the start of a new month, thought it must be time to
revisit
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/emergency%3Dlifeboat_station
Just prior to Christmas, I had suggested, following various suggestions,
that this
Sorry, meant to include the link to the previous discussions:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2022-December/066606.html
Thanks
Graeme
On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 16:16, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> Hi all & welcome back to the New Year!
>
> With Christmas over
Marc_marc wrote:
> >> Le 06.12.22 à 00:47, Graeme Fitzpatrick a écrit :
> >>>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2022-November/066540.html
> >>>
> >>> Are there any further comments that anybody would like to raise?
> &g
On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 at 00:57, Marc_marc wrote:
>
> - what are we mapping ? reading the description, this seems to be more
> of a landuse=ermergency than mapping an emergency service i.e. where
> you can go to get a service
>
The land-based location of emergency groups dedicated to the saving of
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 at 20:54, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
> Still does not resolve my problem with a water rescue station where there
> is no boat.
>
> Before people ask again how that is possible - they might have their boats
> mooring at changing
> locations without a station, but the station is not
On Fri, 16 Dec 2022 at 10:59, Andy Townsend wrote:
> doesn't explain why "amenity=lifeboat" is "deprecated". Like it or not,
> this is used exactly how you'd expect:
>
> https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#20/54.48811/-0.61310
>
But as I've pointed out a couple of times before, by
On Fri, 16 Dec 2022 at 12:15, Andy Townsend wrote:
> Most of the time, yes they can* - 8000 launches per year between 400
> lifeboats is on average 20 per year. If we take a guess at 8 hours per
> launch, it's there 98% of the time.
>
By those numbers, yep, perfectly correct!
But those 8000
Voting cancelled to discuss issues.
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 at 23:53, Marc_marc wrote:
>
> it's a shame to have gone to the vote without resolving the 5 issues raised
>
& it's also a shame that they couldn't have been mentioned as unresolved
when I said twice that it was ready to go to voting!
On Fri, 16 Dec 2022 at 17:55, Marc_marc wrote:
> Le 16.12.22 à 08:30, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging a écrit :
>
> > In this case amenity=lifeboat is - I expect - used to map lifeboat
> > stationing place, not lifeboat itself
>
> of course, like marina doesn't map boats but the mooring area
>
Possibly combine all existing tags under a new top tag
emergency=water_rescue?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/emergency%3Dlifeboat_station#Replace_emergency=lifeboat_station_with_emergency=water_rescue
Thoughts & comments please?
Thanks
Graeme
Further thoughts re air rescue, please.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/emergency%3Dlifeboat_station#Air_rescue
Thanks
Graeme
On Sat, 17 Dec 2022 at 11:05, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> Possibly combine all existing tags under a new top tag
> emergency=water_
On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 at 06:32, Brian M. Sperlongano
wrote:
>
> I recently came across an unexpected tagging combination and I would like
> to understand how folks in various places would interpret this:
>
> highway=
> foot=no
> sidewalk=separate
>
> Would folks regard that as accurate data
On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 at 09:33, Minh Nguyen
wrote:
> other places where cyclists are required to use sidewalks when present.
& then you have places like where I am, where e-scooters are allowed to use
marked bike lanes, riding at speeds up to 25kph (15mph?) on streets with a
speed limit up to
On Sat, 17 Dec 2022 at 18:45, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> 17 gru 2022, 01:19 od graemefi...@gmail.com:
>
> The other issue with the currently mapped info is that most of it appears
> to have come from an unauthorised source.
>
> Can you link problematic
Made some changes to the proposal to delete reference to helicopters &
"rescue-related sites", which will probably both become their own
proposals, but your thoughts & comments are still welcome!
Thanks
Graeme
On Sun, 18 Dec 2022 at 10:55, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
&
No further comments or discussion so moved to voting:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/emergency%3Dlifeboat_station#Voting
Thanks
Graeme
On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 at 12:59, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> I've made a minor change to the format of the possible tags to incl
Bringing this forward to the new month.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2022-November/066540.html
Are there any further comments that anybody would like to raise?
To sum-up, proposal is to:
Approve emergency=lifeboat_station
Deprecate emergency=marine_rescue & merge it's
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 at 19:12, Jez Nicholson wrote:
>
> Is amenity=lifeboat actually wrong?
>
No, not really, but why have amenity=lifeboat & emergency=lifeboat (&
sometimes emergency=marine_rescue) both tagged on the same feature?
> The ones in the UK at least are actual lifeboats, showing
On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 at 09:29, Andy Townsend wrote:
>
> Why not both?
>
Because a boat is a mobile feature, that we don't / can't map?
e.g
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=349559642#map=19/-27.42815/153.08582
- we don't try to map the last bus in the middle row as #632
> Taking an
On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 at 15:38, Minh Nguyen
wrote:
>
> There are some ways to draw attention to a wiki talk page comment in
> general. For example, if I add {{ping|Fizzie41}} to my comment, you'll
> get a notification, including by e-mail if you've set that up. If your
> comment concerns the
On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 at 12:36, Matija Nalis <
mnalis-openstreetmapl...@voyager.hr> wrote:
>
> > My question is for a unique company providing different services for
> > assistance at home, but the goal is not healthcare. Probably
> > office=home_aide could be good, I am questionning english native
On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 at 02:36, stevea wrote:
> this missive attempts to sketch the outline of a possible tagging scheme
> for “utilities” in general. This would be a fairly rich (complex) scheme
> if/as it were to encompass all of the sorts of “utility offices” there are
> around the world. It
On Sat, 19 Nov 2022 at 05:58, Jmapb wrote:
> I think office=home_aide might be good.
> ("home_care" sounds like it's the home that's being cared for.)
How about =home_assistance?
Thanks
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On Sat, 19 Nov 2022 at 08:05, Matija Nalis <
mnalis-openstreetmapl...@voyager.hr> wrote:
>
> However, "energy company" is not restricted to electrical energy.
> Over here in Croatia, another popular energent is natural gas.
>
> In fact, many of "electrical energy providers" are also
> "natural
On Sat, 19 Nov 2022 at 08:45, Matija Nalis <
mnalis-openstreetmapl...@voyager.hr> wrote:
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft=gardener
>
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft=cleaning
The problem with using the various craft= tags, is that a lot of these sort
of
On Sat, 19 Nov 2022 at 11:43, Matija Nalis <
mnalis-openstreetmapl...@voyager.hr> wrote:
> Do you spot the problem here?
> Because I do.
>
Certainly do!
Going back to what I mentioned earlier:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 at 08:21, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
> So far, there h
?
Thanks
Graeme
On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 at 17:08, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/11/22 14:19, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
> > Another question!
> >
> > In a number of places e.g. https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1nBt the Rescue
> > unit has two buildings -
Thu, 17 Nov 2022 at 10:09, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> As emergency=lifeboat_station seems like it may be the most popular
> option, I have now added details to the previously virtually blank page:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Dlifeboat_station
>
> All opinions
s
>
> Graeme
>
>
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 at 09:35, Graeme Fitzpatrick
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 at 19:05, Jez Nicholson
>> wrote:
>>
>>> When the lifeboat is permanently moored at a particular location it is
>>>
On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 at 20:55, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Past discussion on burger vans etc lead to the understanding that if
> something was, for the majority of the time, found at a certain location
> then OSM should map it.
>
True, but part of the argument there was that the van
On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 at 19:12, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Some ships and boats don't move much... as they are part of museums ...
>
On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 at 20:55, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> HMS Belfast in London is mapped as building=ship, for all intents is it
> permanent
On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 at 19:05, Jez Nicholson wrote:
> When the lifeboat is permanently moored at a particular location it is
> less transitory than a busso people can and do tag them. Not me
> necessarily, but other mappers.
>
True, but can you guarantee that I can walk up to that spot
Following our previous discussions, I've now raised a proposal to proceed
with these changes:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/emergency%3Dlifeboat_station
Please comment in whichever of the 3 places that you prefer, & I'll attempt
to keep on top of all of them! :-)
Thanks
901 - 1000 of 1059 matches
Mail list logo
