If you ask me, all fast foods are restaurants, restaurant is just a broader
term.
There's no way we can find a clear line that distinct fast food with slow
food restaurants. What ever rule you find, there will be some example of a
restaurant that fits both descriptions. There is probably a
2014-08-12 20:55 GMT+02:00 Anita Andersson cc0c...@gmx.com:
One idea that got proposed was payment:online:bitcoin=yes/no +
payment:offline:bitcoin=yes/no
where online=purchase through website and
where offline=cash register/Point of sale
Any ideas?
If you are going to tag online payment
with Bitcoin payment at the point of sale:
shop=computer + payment:bitcoin=yes
I think this is an ok scheme.
2014-08-13 13:57 GMT+02:00 Anita Andersson cc0c...@gmx.com:
Janko Mihelić wrote:
If you are going to tag online payment methods (and I'm not 100% sure
that's ok for this database) then I would
2014-08-13 15:12 GMT+02:00 Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de:
But if a shop doesn't accept a certain payment method at its
physical location then I don't think it should be tagged that way even
if they have a website where that payment method is valid.
So what about delivery services? They
2014-08-13 15:36 GMT+02:00 Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de:
The problem is that it isn't blackwhite. For example payment via a phone
number or smartphone app could be both. So I would say payment=yes,
payment:credit_cards=yes etc. should be offline by default, but payment key
itself should
Well first, tunnel=yes is obviously wrong. We need to replace this with
cave=yes. Other than that, I have no problems with this. If a cave has two
cave entrances, then information that they are connected by footpaths is
valuable information.
Janko
2014-08-14 7:29 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny
2014-08-14 12:24 GMT+02:00 André Pirard a.pir...@ulg.ac.be:
On 2014-08-14 11:08, Janko Mihelić wrote :
Well first, tunnel=yes is obviously wrong. We need to replace this with
cave=yes. Other than that, I have no problems with this. If a cave has two
cave entrances, then information
+1 for not using payment:bitcoin=yes if bitcoin is not accepted at the
point of sale.
It shouldn't be a problem for Coinmap to add payment:website:bitcoin=yes as
a new kind of pin. And it would probably make it a much better map.
Janko
___
Tagging
Maybe the cleanest solution is the proposed node relation:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Node
Although that wouldn't give the entrance an attribute with all those
addresses, it would just pile the addresses on top of the entrance. I'm not
sure. Interpolation tag sounds
What happens when the same entrance has two housenumbers, each from its own
street? I'm sure this exists somewhere.
2014-08-18 21:29 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
Il giorno 18/ago/2014, alle ore 16:04, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com
ha scritto:
I propose to
Commons is getting its own Wikibase installation, in addition to being
present in Wikidata. So every photograph, video or audio is going to have
it's own Commons Wikibase ID, with structured properties about that item.
Each category will probably have it's own ID as well. The problem is, this
. Also, you probably need to have the camera mounted on a pole so
that it can see over parked vehicles and pedestrians.
On August 20, 2014 10:25:15 AM CDT, p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
On Wed Aug 20 2014 15:27:06 GMT+0100 (BST), Janko Mihelić wrote:
I'm trying to find a way to photograph
2014-08-24 12:00 GMT+02:00 Fabrizio Carrai fabrizio.car...@gmail.com:
Hi Lorenzo,
my personal opinion is for tourism=attraction + attraction=acquarium.
I don't like attraction=aquarium, I'd rather have
tourism=attraction+man_made=aquarium.
___
2014-08-25 15:53 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
I also don't like
man_made=aquarium
because I'd expect that to describe a single aquarium, i.e. a water filled
container with fish etc. in it, while here we are discussing a structure
like a zoo with footways, service
If you want to map the whole area, maybe the best way is to use this
proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/area:highway
and tag with area:aeroway=taxiway
Janko
2014-08-29 22:59 GMT+02:00 Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org:
On 08/29/2014 10:38 PM, Nelson A. de
The tag smoothness is vague and subjective only if we define it as such.
Values excellent and bad can be treated as placeholders, and we can
define them on the wiki as anything we like and then expect mappers to use
them according to that definition, and not solely by that one string.
If you ask
I've been thinking recently about simplified indoor tagging. I've made the
next picture:
http://i.imgur.com/V09c2KG.png
We have two shops and three entrances, and it would be nice to know which
entrances lead to which shops. Full indoor tagging would mean that we
should draw rooms for both
2014-09-22 1:43 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
wouldn't there typically be direct entrances and no corridors? I think if
you are at this level of detail we could expect that you add the poi as a
polygon, rather than adding nonexistent corridors ;-)
I guess you're
2014-09-29 23:45 GMT+02:00 Lukas Sommer sommer...@gmail.com:
The case of Japan is different. In Japan, the name belongs to the _traffic
signal_, and _not_ to the junction. We need to distinguish this, because
they are usually differently rendered (traffic signal names usually with an
icon and
I used buried:wikidata for that. I used it because a grave can be an art
piece as well, and maybe an artist made a statue of some other historical
person or an angel on the grave.
2014-10-01 14:23 GMT+02:00 Jo winfi...@gmail.com:
While experimenting a bit with Wikidata, I added some
Would schools and hospitals fit into this new landuse tag?
Dana 3. 10. 2014. 20:33 osoba Tom Pfeifer t.pfei...@computer.org
napisala je:
Dan S wrote on 2014-10-03 19:21:
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 2014-10-03 15:32:
I see the introduction of a new, more specific key positive, e.g.
I think OSM isn't a place for this. Number of the grave should be enough,
and naming people in the grave (if they are not famous) looks like data for
other databases. What are other uses for this relation type? Home of a
person, workplace of a person, current location of a person?
2014-10-13
2014-10-13 23:24 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Czernik zbign...@openstreetmap.pl:
What if there are several people in the grave (with different names)?
Semicolons?
I think OSM shouldn't have names of people in the grave. What you are
saying is that, when OSM database is complete, we should have one
2014-10-14 13:55 GMT+02:00 Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk:
If you don't put the names in OSM what do you propose?
Phil (trigpoint)
I think we should have notability, like Wikipedia. I have been using
buried:wikidata=*, and if someone can't get in Wikidata, then I think the
same should
2014-10-20 19:16 GMT+02:00 Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de:
would you mind rephrasing this? I don't understand what you want to tell
us, and I guess others feel similar, given that nobody has replied in
the past 2 days...
Using sport=scuba_diving for a dive spot. That would be like using
with shopping_centre.
Janko Mihelić
Dana 22. 10. 2014. 00:22 osoba John Willis jo...@mac.com napisala je:
Sent from my iPad
On Oct 21, 2014, at 10:45 PM, Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhau...@gmail.com
wrote:
I was also thinking that landuse=retail makes more sense than either mall
opinion superfluous.
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Peninsula
Janko Mihelić
2014-10-27 11:03 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
2014-10-26 21:38 GMT+01:00 Christoph Hormann chris_horm...@gmx.de:
Specific arguments aside - i am not sure if you
2014-10-27 16:24 GMT+01:00 Christoph Hormann chris_horm...@gmx.de:
I can't help but notice that in the whole discussion here no argument
has been put formward indicating a practical advantage of bays mapped
as polygons other than the ease of rendering labels.
Reverse geocoding. A boat comes
Dana 27. 10. 2014. 21:30 osoba Eric Kidd emk.li...@randomhacks.net
napisala je:
The rendering onopenstreetmap.orgis pretty good: it just prints the bay
name at the marked point, and shows it across a reasonable range of scales.
There are some weird cases with nested bays, but those are weird on
2014-10-29 14:46 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
2014-10-29 14:40 GMT+01:00 Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com:
Also bays with very
flat or deep geometry will result in disproportionately small areas so
mappers may feel compelled to do some ugly workarounds if the name of
I suggest a combination of indoor tagging, like described on this page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging
and a custom tag, like library_section=* (or maybe book_type=*, because
this could also be used in book shops).
So a room with children books would be indoor=room +
2014-12-05 10:49 GMT+01:00 Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com:
In my opinion the gas station is not the building but the whole area.
Also the address belongs to the whole area and that's the way I tag gas
stations:
- Draw an area to cover the complete gas station and put amenity=fuel
have states. Maybe you were talking about a different
country?
Janko Mihelić
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Dana 11. 12. 2014. 08:57 osoba Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl
napisala je:
I agree with Greg. Many people still think it is possible to get
worldwide consensus on tagging. This will never happen as long as the tags
are so subjective. Check out the thread on the definitions of
-1 for amenity=reuse. Building=house can also be reused. This might be the
most vague tag I've ever seen.
Dana 18. 12. 2014. 14:55 osoba Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
napisala je:
for reference, there have been discussions on this previously:
I like maxspeed:variable=* simply because it lets you use maxspeed=* in its
original sense. Maxspeed=signals robs you of that original tag and routers
now have to dig deep into tags to understand the real maxspeed.
Keep the simple tags, and build around them, that's what I say.
Janko.
Dana 19.
2014-12-20 15:02 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at:
Is it too much of a challenge for router developers to look at one or two
other tags?
Not a big challenge, but an unnecessary one. Also, a challenge for mappers.
And won't maxspeed=number + maxspeed:type=signals (or
2014-12-28 23:35 GMT+01:00 Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de:
fitness_centre:access=membership, fitness_centre:access=club? private?
Or have something like fitness_centre=yes? (Not sure as we already have
sport=*)
Why complicate things? I think a simple access=private (or maybe
Maybe CANVEC uses it instead of unknown?
2014-12-29 11:16 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com:
I rolled the map-roulette wheel, and found a series of highways in Canada
marked with lanes=-1, all part of a CANVEC import.
I see 17,943 uses of this value: it's less popular than 5 lanes
2014-12-30 9:40 GMT+01:00 johnw jo...@mac.com:
Ahh, I see - that makes sense.
so, I should leave the pedestrain areas as they are, and add an
additional area for the roof (so I would have two areas - one the footpath
and the other a roof with the adjacent areas as pedestrian)
or
make
2014-12-30 22:16 GMT+01:00 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com:
It may well mean what it says, a one-lane road. Some rural areas in the
USA still have one-lane roads, with occasional wider spots where one
vehicle can pause to allow a vehicle going the other direction to pass by.
Given how
+1
I think this should be tagged with lanes, to be compatible with road lane
tagging:
bicycle:lanes:forward=designated|no
foot:lanes:forward=no|designated
Or if this looks a bit complicated (it does to me) invent a new tag,
something like:
designated:lanes:forward=bicycle|foot
Janko Mihelić
I always thought access=destination meant you can go through a road with a
car, if your destination is that road. You can't use that road to go to a
different road.
2015-01-02 17:01 GMT+01:00 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
Happy new year
Am 31.12.2014 um 19:05 schrieb Greg Troxel:
johnw
I'm not an expert, but don't only big airports have the IATA code? Only 9
airports have the IATA code in Croatia, and about 30 have the ICAO code.
Maybe you have to meet certain standards to get the IATA code.
Janko Mihelić
2015-01-03 14:54 GMT+01:00 Christoph Hormann chris_horm...@gmx.de
Landuse=religious AFAIK started being used for land that is owned by a
religious entity, and in it there would be schools, playgrounds, priest
living grounds, and so on. Then this was disputed, and if this was actually
landuse=residential.
Some said it should be used for the land around a church,
There's a different problem. An airport with a grassy runway in Europe
should be rendered at z13. Not very important. But a grassy runway in
Africa, 500km from the nearest airport is important enough for z7.
We should start making algorithms that take into account the context of an
entity. Maybe
2015-01-25 23:30 GMT+01:00 Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com:
If this tag is to be useful (assuming it is the sort of thing OSM
should record), maybe using Wikidata should be considered through an
additional tag such as dedication:wikidata=Q33923 for Saint Peter
2015-01-28 19:25 GMT+01:00 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
If there used to be a building but all that is left is a clearing in the
forest, then the clearing will be in OSM, and not a building with a
lifecycle tag of removed.
But what if hikers still refer to the spot? Like Let's go to
://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes:psv
And in my town those lanes are reserved for trams, buses and taxis.
Janko Mihelić
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Why not tourism=reception_desk? We have tourism=hotel, tourism=camp_site,
tourism=information, it's only logical to use the same key.
Janko Mihelić
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
2015-02-08 17:48 GMT+01:00 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
Actually, I use an even more general approach:
railway:forward=tram
railway:lanes:backward=tram|no
together with access I also use train
access:lanes:backward=no|yes
train:lanes:backward=designated|no
I don't understand why you
2015-02-08 15:47 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
maybe building:part=courtyard would be a good tag semantic wise (but
unlikely to be rendered on the main style)
+1
That's the first one that came to my mind. That is a part of the building.
When I was mapping manors I
describe
lanes, they do not represent the railway. Tag
tram:lanes:forward=no|designated only says that the outer lane has a
railway track on it.
Janko Mihelić
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
I don't get how amenity=drinking_water is a problem. It is just a tag with
a wider meaning. man_made=water_tap+drinking_water=yes is a special type
of amenity=drinking_water, as is natural=spring+drinking_water=yes or
some other combination.
___
Tagging
As for newcomers, I think editors like iD should hide the intricacies of
the tagging system anyway. If you click drinking water it puts
amenity=drinking_water. But then it offers you all types of drinking
water, like a tap, a spring, bottled water in a vending machine, a hose, a
well and if you
Using the phrase intersection of street x and street y is used all the
time, probably everywhere in the western world. But we don't use
addr:intersection.
Are there streets where if you use corner of street x and street y people
wouldn't understand, because the corner of those streets isn't a
2015-01-15 12:23 GMT+01:00 Andrew Shadura and...@shadura.me:
On 15 January 2015 at 03:02, johnw jo...@mac.com wrote:
The proposal seems to be a good solution to this problem.
This particular proposal seems to be a terrible solution to this
problem. It requires changes to the software, and
2015-01-15 11:23 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
I wonder if it wouldn't make more sense to use the approach of islands /
archipelago, i.e. have a dedicated, explicit and specific tag for the
combined feature (e.g. several natural=island/islet can be together in a
2015-02-19 10:27 GMT+01:00 Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com:
I'd do
tourism=maze ... similar to zoo, theme park, museum, artwork.
and if necessary sub tag under that .. there are lots of different types
.. see wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maze
I agree. It's simple and to the point.
Dana 11. 1. 2015. 10:22 osoba Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de napisala
je:
I feel like this would be so much simpler if the amenity tag was not
limited to vending_machines.
In Germany everything is just called Automat.
- cigarettes = Zigarettenautomat
- parcel = Paketautomat (Well, not
2015-02-10 11:29 GMT+01:00 Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk:
This does seem very complicated, I cannot see much take up by mappers on
the ground.
Traffic signal timing varies by time of day, day of week, and traffic
density. Many traffic signals can be remotely controlled to clear
2015-02-09 13:30 GMT+01:00 Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com:
Just one quick question: are there any tags describing the track bed and
ties?
Here is a huge list of railway tags:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging
There is embedded=yes/no/pavement/wood/metal/plastic
Maybe it's for special cargo. If you are a regular truck, you have to use
maxwidth. But if you are a truck that has oversize load[1] you use
maxwidth:physical.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oversize_load
Janko
___
Tagging mailing list
that is already used, we can discuss it
here.
Janko Mihelić
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
2015-01-04 19:55 GMT+01:00 Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl:
I would use a subtag, like natural=water, water=pond, pond=fish_pond.
The paradoxic effect of adding more detailed tags is that the data
gets less useful to data consumers, because most data users won't add
particular
2015-01-04 20:25 GMT+01:00 Lukas Sommer sommer...@gmail.com:
But we have also yet an existing tag water=pond for ponds. We would
have to change the defination for this tag from “a pond”
to “a pond – but not if this is a pond that serves for fishing” –
sounds complicate …
A pond is the same
2015-01-04 21:49 GMT+01:00 Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhau...@gmail.com:
Have you looked at what tagging people are using (if any) within
landuse=aquaculture and/or landuse=fishfarm areas?
I have looked now, and they are used pretty inconsistently. Sometimes every
fishpond is tagged with it's own
2015-01-04 22:07 GMT+01:00 althio forum althio.fo...@gmail.com:
Hi Janko
The tagging would be better IMO if we separate feature and use.
Hence this proposal to be refined:
Feature
natural=water or place https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place=
ocean
So theoretically, we shouldn't ban anything from being mapped (or almost
anything). But practically, we don't want people being routed to the
nearest toilet that is actually inside a power plant. How do we fix this?
One way could be to add a prefix like private:
to anything that is by default
2015-03-18 11:38 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
if that toilet is tagged with amenity=toilets it is a tagging error and the
tag should be fixed or the object completely removed. The toilets tag is
for toilet[s] open to the public.
Well, it is a toilet, and it is an
2015-03-18 12:15 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
It would require us to add operator tags to every single object inside
another object with the same operator tag, if I got you right.
Only to the ones that are by default used by public, so toilets,
waste_disposals, and
2015-03-18 12:58 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
the operator doesn't tell you anything about access rights, property
structure, publicness etc.
It is about the entity _operating_ a feature / object / thing.
It doesn't, but it tells you who decides on those things.
2015-03-19 13:46 GMT+01:00 Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbek...@gmail.com:
I would prefer a different tag as I would not like the lemonade table to
be rendered in the same way as a regular filling station. The tag shop=gas
with subtag would be better.
I like shop, but gas is an aggregate state of
2015-03-09 11:57 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
this looks very complicated to render, because you have to synchronize to
flights of steps so that they become one, I guess this will be much easier
if you mapped 2 steps instead of this very complex object (doesn't look
they have mapped,
and to guide mappers in their choice of tags.
If you decide to use this layer for different purposes you are guaranteed
to have problems.
Janko Mihelić
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org
2015-03-09 23:06 GMT+01:00 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com:
How does it help mappers see what they have mapped to not show a large
structure which has been mapped and which is physically present?
I didn't say the bridge shouldn't be rendered. I just said it's not default
layers job to
The left part starts with a tread, and the right one starts with a rise.
Janko Mihelić
[1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stairs#mediaviewer/File:Stairway_Measurements.svg
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org
vanished.
I think this is pretty elegant.
Janko Mihelić
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Dana 9. 3. 2015. 01:48 osoba Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com napisala je:
Sorry ... but
That assume that the vanishing is done on the lowest way.. it may also be
done on the upper way .. or it could be done on both! And it is conceivable
for when done on both to have the same nuber of steps side to
I think this should be resolved with lots and lots of photos, which the
community then segregates into classes. Smoothness on asphalt is something
entirely different than smoothness on sand, or smoothness on ground.
When a mapper is in doubt, just look at 10 photos which are determined to
be
In a broader sense, volcano is a mountain that appeared after a volcano
blew up. The problem is, we don't yet have a way of mapping mountains.
There was a suggestion to map a mountain by tagging mountain=xyz on all
entities that define a mountain, that is peaks, ridges, mountain passes and
such.
I like the proposal, and would vote for it.
uto, 31. ožu 2015. 00:55 Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com je napisao:
I have lifted the scheme originally proposed by Mike to
a proposal page, did not have time for details yet.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Volcanic_features
Nominatim heavily uses the Wikipedia tag to decide which search result to
put in front. So if you write Paris in the search box, Paris, Texas is
not going to be the first result. They look at the length of the article,
number of translated articles, or something like that. I see no reason
What are those toilets? Are they little shacks like this one:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pit_latrines_in_Briqueterie_-_des_latrines_%C3%A1_fosses_%C3%A0_la_Briqueterie,_Yaounde_%283447843124%29.jpg
If so, then maybe building=toilet could be the best fit.
I've been looking at tags from
2015-03-05 12:59 GMT+01:00 Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl:
Where the steps (probably at the bottom) meet a street which is
itself steeply sloping. The number of steps is not constant across the
width and the difference between extreme left and extreme right may be
several steps.
How
If those toilets are private, why do they state if women can use them?
Isn't that a private matter up to the owner of the toilette?
2015-03-03 15:04 GMT+01:00 Malcolm Herring malcolm.herr...@btinternet.com:
On 03/03/2015 13:30, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Mar 2, 2015 12:07 PM, Bryce Nesbitt
Well, the street is likely already tagged with oneway=yes, so we know the
direction of spikes. I'll throw out a suggestion: barrier=one_way_spikes.
Janko
uto, 14. tra 2015. 07:47 Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com je
napisao:
Take a look at this nasty device that prevents traveling the
A building=storage_tank only tells you what the building looks like from
the outside, and what was it's first purpose. It could very well be an
interesting hotel.
uto, 14. tra 2015. 07:45 Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us je napisao:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Mateusz Konieczny
How do you know the direction of water flow if you don't have the way?
Janko
uto, 14. tra 2015. 11:45 Torstein Ingebrigtsen Bø torstein...@gmail.com
je napisao:
Hi,
I'm currently importing topological data of Norway to OSM. From the data
set we have riverbanks; however, we do not have the
Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com je napisao:
How do you know the direction of water flow if you don't have the way?
Janko
uto, 14. tra 2015. 11:45 Torstein Ingebrigtsen Bø torstein...@gmail.com
je napisao:
Hi,
I'm currently importing topological data of Norway to OSM. From the data
set we have
sri, 29. tra 2015. 18:32 Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com je napisao:
In the case of a mangrove forest, it means
exactly what it seems like: there is
no other land type between forest and water.
I think you should map a mangrove forest over the water, if tree trunks are
sticking out
I would be more in favor of a+b) because you might want to tag a place with
shop=pastry because 95% of their assortiment is pastry, but they have 5%
candy so you add candy=yes.
Janko
pon, 11. svi 2015. 17:12 Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhau...@gmail.com je
napisao:
In my experience, most places that
ned, 10. svi 2015. 14:54 Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk je
napisao:
Really:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Memorial ?
Every monument is a memorial, isn't it? Monuments are large memorials.
Janko
___
Tagging mailing list
+1 for solution 1. It's the most future-safe, it's easiest to explain, and
most likely not to be misunderstood by new mappers. A few extra nodes is a
small price.
Janko
čet, 7. svi 2015. 18:49 Mike N nice...@att.net je napisao:
I tend to migrate toward solution 1 in urban environments.
In Croatia historic=monument is often wrongly used to tag all types of
sculptures. Only a dedicated icon for sculptures (tourism=artwork +
artwork_type=sculpture) can fix that.
Janko
čet, 7. svi 2015. 18:05 Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhau...@gmail.com je
napisao:
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 12:11 AM,
There was a proposal of the tag cluster recently, and a mailing list thread:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2015-January/020959.html
ned, 17. svi 2015. 17:24 Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com je napisao:
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 04:15:02PM +0100, Philip Barnes wrote:
pet, 15. svi 2015. 13:15 Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com je napisao:
On 15/05/2015 4:55 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
A lot of those end up as natural=water. I suppose man_made=yes could
be added.
The 'Pool of Reflection' Sydney is simply tagged
natural=water
name=Pool of Reflection
Way: 182625202
pet, 15. svi 2015. 13:15 Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com je napisao:
On 15/05/2015 4:55 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
A lot of those end up as natural=water. I suppose man_made=yes could
be added.
The 'Pool of Reflection' Sydney is simply tagged
natural=water
name=Pool of Reflection
Way: 182625202
It maybe controversial, but I think we don't want everyone editing the
map. I think we need some barriers to filter out people who are good
mappers. Good mappers have to understand this is not a service for them,
but a community. They have to understand this is not a drawn map but a
database. They
This talk by Richard Fairhurst suggests that 5% of mappers do 95% of work.
So it's more important to find those few dedicated mappers and make their
life easier, than to cater to the 95%.
http://vimeopro.com/openstreetmapus/state-of-the-map-us-2013/video/68097488
Janko
ned, 17. svi 2015. 07:43
201 - 300 of 455 matches
Mail list logo
