:stop and backward:stop
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route#Members).
LeTopographeFou
Le 02/09/2016 à 23:11, Svavar Kjarrval a écrit :
On fös 2.sep 2016 20:54, André Pirard wrote:
On 2016-09-02 22:20, Svavar Kjarrval wrote:
JOSM doesn't allow the user to add any repeats at all. Fortunat
By the way the subject of the mail was "Typo fix for
tunnel=building_passage and how to proceed in the future" and not a
discussion on which tag to choose, so I restore it to not confuse
people. Please don't associate with my question something else ;-) .
Yours,
LeTopographeFou
).
Yours
LeTopographeFou
Le 10/09/2016 à 15:35, ajt1...@gmail.com a écrit :
On 10/09/2016 11:42, LeTopographeFou wrote:
I've noticed several typo errors in tag values. I would like to fix
them when it is obvious.
let's try that again but without pressing "send" instead of "edit&q
variations, even if they are
wrong. It can also help to highlight errors in some tools.
Yours,
LeTopographeFou
Le 10/09/2016 à 13:23, Simone Saviolo a écrit :
Yes, an obvious one: a building_passage *goes through a building* :)
Semantically it is quite important to distinguish between a
colonnade
is unclear on this point.
So I've made a proposal here for a first edit:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/LeTopographeFou#.23002_-_Typos_with_tunnel.3Dbuilding_passage
Thank you for your feedback
* vote is ok
* don't worry, document and do when it's obvious
* edit one by one/conta
Thank you Dave and sorry if I've been so strict :-).
FYI: I've made the fix, plus some others to clean a little bit the
tunnel values. Everything is explained here:
*
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/LeTopographeFou#.23002_-_Typos_with_tunnel.3Dbuilding_passage
*
http
ent arches?
Yours,
LeTopographeFou
Le 17/09/2016 à 14:45, Colin Smale a écrit :
I would expect that the situation where the flow direction conflicts
with the traffic direction is likely to be quite short - under
bridges, around obstacles etc. In these cases we could always call on
our old friend
according to taginfo, 0.23%) with oneway=yes.
Is there any undocumented purpose? Is it ok and safe to delete
oneway=yes tags for streams?
The same question can apply to drains, ditches, canals...
Yours,
--
LeTopographeFou
___
Tagging mailing list
hop=estate_agent and office=estate_agent would
coexist, each one with its own meaning (or another mecanism to
differenciate an open shop from a limited-access office, both working to
sell/manage real estates, would be devised). Same principle can be
applied to insurances, law firms... which ar
be consistent in which key
to encourage. As soon as direction=* is valid I would encourage it as
the primary method, would not deprecate the second one but explain it is
one way of avoiding ambiguities in some cases.
Yours,
LeTopographeFou
Le 20/03/2017 à 17:19, Jean-Marc Liotier a écrit
hens the first guess that is is probably more
a theme park than a collection of attractions, even if there is no
roller coaster.
Having said that I don't know what will be "Ghibli theme park" but it is
just to say that I would not focus only on rides.
Yours,
LeTopographeFou
Le 0
of having a consistent hospital, hotel, school...
mapping system.
Yours,
LeTopographeFou
Le 29/09/2017 à 17:11, Bryan Housel a écrit :
If you draw a “Hotel” in iD, you’ll see that it gets a `building=yes`
tag added to it.
(Users can change this if they like).
Again, this is exactly in
building). Same for
Hospitals. For me iD is already ready.
But one may propose a new translation to replace "Hotel" by "Hotel
Grounds" to be consistent with how hospitals are proposed in iD.
By the way this is how I tag hotels now so +1 with the proposal.
Yours,
LeTopographeFou
which would lead to the tourism=accomodation schema.
But I think that whatever we do (new schema vs existing schema) an
"Accomodation" wiki page (routing to hotel/motel/... tags) will be
helpfull to today route to existing tags and maybe tomorrow explain the
new schema.
Yours,
LeTop
My understanding is that surface=* can be used to describe any type of
surface of a way/node, so yes it is ok to use it for turning_circle even
if the Wiki might not explicitely suggest it (feel free to edit it).
LeTopographeFou
Le 02/01/2019 à 19:23, Tod Fitch a écrit :
I am implementing
ages which will never (?) be aligned.
Yours,
LeTopographeFou
Le 23/12/2018 à 12:05, bkil a écrit :
Thank you for the insight, I'll try to figure out a better wording
there. I'm also considering to improve the wording of the guest house
and hotel articles in the future, though I'll need to find a
start it and people will collaborate.
Merry Christmas to everyone, a time to remember how fascinating is the
Planet we are trying to map.
Yours,
LeTopographeFou
Le 23/12/2018 à 21:37, bkil a écrit :
Unfortunately, if we only included the objective criteria based on a
high interaction bet
://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:garden:type) (with this one
you are close to what you are looking for, but it's not a garden...
Yours,
LeTopographeFou
Le 04/07/2019 à 08:59, joost schouppe a écrit :
Hi,
I stumbled upon some planters that are privately operated, on public
domain, contain nothing
The issue with building=stilt_house is that two things are mixed in one
key. I would prefer stilts=yes (2945 occurences) + building=* or place=*
or highway=* or even landuse=* for a full redidential area.
LeTopographeFou
Le 25/11/2020 à 09:59, Alan Mackie a écrit :
This probably isn't too far
/wiki/Airport_apron . Taxilane seems to be a
valid word for that, and already in use by some in OSM, so I'm all in
for it.
Cheers,
LeTopographeFou
Le 01/02/2024 à 11:18, Warin a écrit :
Hi
Typically on an airport the planes parking position is marked by a
small circle, the is usually tagged
20 matches
Mail list logo
