Re: [Tagging] Discouraging frequency=* on power lines and cables

2017-03-09 Thread Michael Reichert
Hi David, Am 09.03.2017 um 06:35 schrieb David Marchal: >> Le 8 mars 2017 à 23:04, Michael Reichert a écrit : >> >> Please keep OSM simple. I don't want to add a power route relation on >> every tiny minor distribution line/cable (230 V). >> > Totally agree with that. I don’t

Re: [Tagging] Discouraging frequency=* on power lines and cables

2017-03-09 Thread Jherome Miguel
Though busy, I will share my opinion on tagging frequency on power lines, and also the use of power route relations On Mar 9, 2017 5:40 PM, "François Lacombe" wrote: Hi David, 2017-03-09 6:35 GMT+01:00 David Marchal : > > > Le 8 mars 2017 à 23:04,

Re: [Tagging] Discouraging frequency=* on power lines and cables

2017-03-09 Thread François Lacombe
Hi David, 2017-03-09 6:35 GMT+01:00 David Marchal : > > > Le 8 mars 2017 à 23:04, Michael Reichert a écrit : > > > > Please keep OSM simple. I don't want to add a power route relation on > > every tiny minor distribution line/cable (230 V). > > > Totally agree

Re: [Tagging] Discouraging frequency=* on power lines and cables

2017-03-08 Thread David Marchal
> Le 8 mars 2017 à 23:04, Michael Reichert a écrit : > > Please keep OSM simple. I don't want to add a power route relation on > every tiny minor distribution line/cable (230 V). > Totally agree with that. I don’t understand the usage of a relation binding the distribution

Re: [Tagging] Discouraging frequency=* on power lines and cables

2017-03-08 Thread François Lacombe
Hi Warin, More than a guide, wiki sounds like a reference to me. Actually, editors presets, QA tools and consumers - all after contributors - will rely on it to define their behaviour and targets. Agree with you there are no rules, just material to discuss and important basis to built up on.

Re: [Tagging] Discouraging frequency=* on power lines and cables

2017-03-08 Thread Michael Reichert
Hi François, Am 2017-03-08 um 15:18 schrieb François Lacombe: > frequency=* tag aims to qualify active elements on telecom or power > networks (among others, see wiki > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:frequency) > > I see it as an optional property of power lines or cables. >

Re: [Tagging] Discouraging frequency=* on power lines and cables

2017-03-08 Thread Warin
On 09-Mar-17 03:19 AM, François Lacombe wrote: Hi Tom, 2017-03-08 16:08 GMT+01:00 Tom Pfeifer >: The wiki documents for what particular tags are for. This tag is used 826577 times, so this documentation is essential. Also,

Re: [Tagging] Discouraging frequency=* on power lines and cables

2017-03-08 Thread François Lacombe
Hi Tom, 2017-03-08 16:08 GMT+01:00 Tom Pfeifer : > > The wiki documents for what particular tags are for. This tag is used > 826577 times, so this documentation is essential. > > Also, we normally do not delete wiki pages at all. The process would be to > discourage or

Re: [Tagging] Discouraging frequency=* on power lines and cables

2017-03-08 Thread Tom Pfeifer
On 08.03.2017 15:18, François Lacombe wrote: frequency=* tag aims to qualify active elements on telecom or power networks (among others, see wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:frequency) I see it as an optional property of power lines or cables.

[Tagging] Discouraging frequency=* on power lines and cables

2017-03-08 Thread François Lacombe
Hi, frequency=* tag aims to qualify active elements on telecom or power networks (among others, see wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:frequency) I see it as an optional property of power lines or cables. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dline In practice, a physical