André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
In summary, I don't know how many of you appreciate to tag with this
result where no tractor or motorbike driver will know which way they can
go and where pedestrians will not know where they will quietly walk
without meeting drivers...
Probaly
On 2014-05-19 18:12, André Pirard wrote :
This is about OSM ticket https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/5163
(obsolete):
The rendering of highway=path and highway=track is barely
distinguishable.
...
In summary, I don't know how many of you appreciate to tag with this
result where no
Am 21.05.2014 06:51, schrieb André Pirard:
On 2014-05-19 19:27, Matthijs Melissen wrote :
If you feel strong about it, I would encourage you to open a new issue
on https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto, the issue
tracker of the CartoCSS used on openstreetmap.org
Hi,
This is about OSM ticket https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/5163:
The rendering of highway=path and highway=track is barely distinguishable.
For example, many huge width highway=residential continue to an extra
thin =track and then invisibly change to a =path.
Just like on my National
André Pirard wrote:
Hi,
This is about OSM ticket https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/5163:
The rendering of highway=path and highway=track is barely
distinguishable.
Just my 2p, but personally I don't think that the rendering of
highway=track and highway=path on the standard map are
This is @
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/281165129#map=18/50.52934/5.81330layers=D
Look at Le Stockis : residential - track - path transitions in the
circles where they meet.
Compare with the IGN map on the right.
Ask anyone without hinting them by the topology which is track and which
is
On 2014-05-19 18:35, SomeoneElse wrote :
André Pirard wrote:
Hi,
This is about OSM ticket https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/5163:
The rendering of highway=path and highway=track is barely
distinguishable.
Just my 2p, but personally I don't think that the rendering of
highway=track
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 2:38 PM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you make that test: asking people which is track or path? Where walkers
and tractors would go?
Isn't this the job of the map key?
___
Tagging mailing list
replying to tagging, it's the only one of these lists i'm on
On 5/19/14 12:12 PM, André Pirard wrote:
Hi,
This is about OSM ticket https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/5163:
The rendering of highway=path and highway=track is barely
distinguishable.
For example, many huge width
André Pirard wrote:
On 2014-05-19 18:35, SomeoneElse wrote :
If you feel strongly about it why not knock up a rendering with more
differentiation between track and path and invite people to compare
with the current standard map?
¿¿¿ ¡¡¡ That is exactly what I did with showing OSM and IGN
On 2014-05-19 19:41, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote :
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 2:38 PM, André Pirard
a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you make that test: asking people which is track or path? Where
walkers and tractors would go?
Isn't this the job of the map key?
Strangely, I was just looking
not make this edge
case worse/better)
Hope that helps.
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 19:38:23 +0200
From: a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] [OpenStreetMap] #5163: paths and tracks rendering
indistinguishable: your opinion?
On 2014-05-19 18:35
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 4:18 PM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Strangely, I was just looking at the key when your message popped up. Did
you look too?
Just saw now that there is one problem in the key: there is no info
about paths (only about tracks and footways, like you
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
CC: mapnik-t...@openstreetmap.org; openstreet...@matthijsmelissen.nl
Subject: Re: [Tagging] [OpenStreetMap] #5163: paths and tracks rendering
indistinguishable: your opinion?
On 2014-05-19 19:41, Nelson A. de
Oliveira wrote :
On Mon, May 19
14 matches
Mail list logo
