k>
Gesendet: Sonntag, 15. März 2020 18:54
An: tagging@openstreetmap.org<mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org>
Betreff: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - give box
On Sun, 2020-03-15 at 12:42 -0400, Jmapb via Tagging wrote:
On 3/15/2020 6:18 AM, Markus Peloso wrote:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/
On Sun, 2020-03-15 at 12:42 -0400, Jmapb via Tagging wrote:
> On 3/15/2020 6:18 AM, Markus Peloso
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/give_box
> >
> > A small facilit
On 3/15/2020 6:18 AM, Markus Peloso wrote:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/give_box
A small facility where people drop off and pick up various types of
items in the sense of free sharing.
Hi
After "Clarify whatever explicit abstaining is the same as no vote"
and the chan
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/give_box
A small facility where people drop off and pick up various types of items in
the sense of free sharing.
Hi
After "Clarify whatever explicit abstaining is the same as no vote" and the
change of the Proposal process page I reopen the
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 17:53, Peter Neale wrote:
> Oh, so, the Wiki doesn't use standard British English then.? Hmmm.
>
It uses standard, British informal English, rather than the technical
British
English used to describe voting procedures.
> Your final comment reminds me of my IT Course
Oh, so, the Wiki doesn't use standard British English then.? Hmmm.
Your final comment reminds me of my IT Course. "Definition of Recursion: See
Recursion". ;-)
Regards,Peter
>On Thursday, 6 February 2020, 17:39:35 GMT, Paul Allen
wrote:
>On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 17:09, Peter Neale
On 2/6/2020 10:47 AM, Paul Allen wrote:
And if they wanted to comment but not vote they'd add their comment to the
talk page instead. Right?
Absolutely! If that's what the instructions said. But they clearly say
that if you do want to comment, but you don't want to vote, then choose
"abstain."
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 15:19, Jmapb via Tagging
wrote:
> The current description of "approved" on
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process is:
>
> > A rule of thumb for enough support is 8 unanimous approval votes or at
> least 10 votes with more than 74 % approval
>
Reading that, an
[Sorry for the repost, corrected wiki link below...]
On 2/6/2020 5:40 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Actually, in the past we always have counted every kind of comment
(vote yes / no and abstain) as part of the total, which indeed led to
the situation that an (explicit) abstention effectively c
On 2/6/2020 5:40 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Actually, in the past we always have counted every kind of comment
(vote yes / no and abstain) as part of the total, which indeed led to
the situation that an (explicit) abstention effectively counted like a
no-vote.
Are we going to change this now
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 12:22:13AM +, marc marc wrote:
> i have in mind the proposal diaper<>changing table: totally ok for the
Eh, except that OSM is supposed to use British English, and "diaper"
should be nappy.
ael
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagg
Am Do., 6. Feb. 2020 um 01:11 Uhr schrieb Joseph Eisenberg <
joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com>:
> Ok, so we should consider it approved in this case.
>
> (For context, both Mateusz Konieczny and myself have abstained, along
> with 3 others, but had comments expressing concern about using
> "give_box" in
ards,
Markus Peloso
Von: Joseph Eisenberg<mailto:joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com>
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2020 15:00
An: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools<mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org>
Betreff: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - give box
Well, if we count all of thos
On 6/2/20 5:13 pm, European Water Project wrote:
I see good arguments on both sides
but I tend to agree with Joseph and Marc about the need to put
substance over form.
Maybe the proposal just passes based on objective measurements (vote
ratio), but that if enough people post facto see e
I see good arguments on both sides
but I tend to agree with Joseph and Marc about the need to put substance
over form.
Maybe the proposal just passes based on objective measurements (vote
ratio), but that if enough people post facto see enough flaws that it can
be temporarily suspended.
To
the proposals (I'm talking generally, not just about this one) have
often 2 flaws:
- often too big (not this one)
- often rfc too short, even active people still have remarks to make
that the vote is already open, so they are stuck to sink the proposal
(with the risk that its author gets demotivate
Ok, so we should consider it approved in this case.
(For context, both Mateusz Konieczny and myself have abstained, along
with 3 others, but had comments expressing concern about using
"give_box" instead of "free_box" or something easier to understand.)
But hypothetically, what if there were even
On 6/2/20 4:02 am, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
I see no good reason to count explicit "abstain but have comments"
exactly like "vote against".
+1
To abstain from voting is to not cast a vote. So there were 14 votes
with just under 93% approving.
__
I see no good reason to count explicit "abstain but have comments"
exactly like "vote against".
Feb 5, 2020, 14:58 by joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com:
> Well, if we count all of those, it is 68% (13/19) which is less than
> the 74% cut-off.
>
> I don't think this should be considered "approved". The
On 2/5/2020 8:58 AM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
Well, if we count all of those, it is 68% (13/19) which is less than
the 74% cut-off.
Is it normal to count abstentions as part of the vote total? The
proposal template text (
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Proposed_feature_voting )
say
Well, if we count all of those, it is 68% (13/19) which is less than
the 74% cut-off.
I don't think this should be considered "approved". There were several
comments that "free box" or something else that is more common in
British English should be considered instead.
More important than the numb
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dgive_box
A small facility where people drop off and pick up various types of items in
the sense of free sharing and reuse.
Hi
Thanks for voting and for the inputs. Based on the result «13 votes for, 1 vote
against and 5 abstentions» I set the s
On 1/21/2020 3:42 AM, Markus Peloso wrote:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/give_box
A small facility where people drop off and pick up various types of
items in the sense of free sharing.
Hi
Thanks for the discussion, inputs and improvement to this tag.
*I request for v
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/give_box
A small facility where people drop off and pick up various types of items in
the sense of free sharing.
Hi
Thanks for the discussion, inputs and improvement to this tag.
I request for voting now.
Feel free to give also a negative
24 matches
Mail list logo
