2009/10/10 OJ W ojwli...@googlemail.com:
multiple plans would overlap each other and look weird?
look weird where? I guess these would not be rendered in standard maps
(or just in advanced planning phases and for main plans like
motorways, airports, etc.).
I made a proposal:
actually I think that instead of discussing interpolation with
regularlyskipped numbers you could map explicitly the nodes of the
real numbers, thus getting a high-precision map instead of this
interpolation-crab, that is much less useful then an actual accurate
position ;-)
just my 2 cents.
2009/10/14 sly (sylvain letuffe) li...@letuffe.org:
In the holes continuity, it as been proposed that an area representing
something inside another area would still be part of a multipolygon relation
but with it's own tags.
no, this is not the case. Multipolygon says: the inner part is NOT
2009/10/15 sly (sylvain letuffe) li...@letuffe.org:
On jeudi 15 octobre 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
For the lake in the forest: do you agree that someone would say: the
lake (pond) is in the forest? Like a way in the forest, which doesn't
have trees growing on it, but still
2009/10/19 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
2009/10/19 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
1. mapfeatures
Only covers a very limited subset of tags.
the most used ones.
2. wiki-search
Due to the wiki being used for everything this is very ineffective at
times, do a search
2009/10/24 Lesi l...@lesi.is-a-geek.net:
- In the forum somebody has suggested to add a tag for the name of the mine
the mineshaft belongs to. At first I thought this would be the same as
operator, but actually it is not. So which tag would be appropriate?
mine=...?
to associate the
2009/10/30 Pieren pier...@gmail.com
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Randy rwtnospam-new...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Possibly just building=roof
would work (not my idea, someone else suggested it).
I have a much bigger preference to building=roof or building=cover
on the element on the top
2009/10/31 Marjan Vrban mvr...@gmail.com
I have an idea, but i'm no programmer :-)
How about implemeting toll amount into ways that require payment, so
routing engines could calculate toll cost for some route. It would be in
local currency and convertable to other (e.g. 100HRK=13,83 EUR).
2009/11/4 Richard Bullock rb...@cantab.net
We don't *have* to stick to dictionary definitions here when tagging, as
long as the meaning is clear;
exactly, this is not generally about dictionary definitions but about the
meaning of words. Dictionaries can give you hints if you're unsure. If
2009/11/4 Peter Childs pchi...@bcs.org
Its a Way under a building where the building is either on legs or exists
above and on both sides on the way. The way not blocked by a door (to enter
the building). However other barrier (eg Staggered Fence or Gate) may exist
to limit access to the way.
2009/11/21 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com
You maybe ain't going to like this, but the usual distinction in the UK is
that residentials are (typically) 6m+ wide and have pavements/sidewalks,
whereas service is for urban roads which don't have pavements/sidewalks.
Richrd
2009/11/27 Pieren pier...@gmail.com
no, IMHO we shouldn't generally imply but tag explicitly, otherwise
consistency is at risk.
no, if we don't have defaults, we will have to populate 20, 30 or 50
attributs on each highway in the future.
come on, I wonder where those 50 attributes should
2009/11/27 Jonathan Bennett openstreet...@jonno.cix.co.uk
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
no, IMHO we shouldn't generally imply but tag explicitly, otherwise
consistency is at risk.
If the tags implied by another tag were documented in a standard form,
in a central place (so any application
2009/11/28 Jonathan Bennett openstreet...@jonno.cix.co.uk
My point was about newcomers to the project, who haven't sat in on
endless tedious tagging discussions (and may have no wish to do so)
assuming that because every instance of a type of road they know is one
way that it's an inherent
2009/11/30 Martin Fossdal Guttesen mgutte...@hotmail.com
how do i tag/draw a connection between 2 islands, it is not a bridge as i
understand a bridge
take a look at the pictures on this page if you dont know what i mean
http://landsverk.fo/default.asp?sida=718bolkaid=6projectid=299
yes,
2009/11/30 Mike N. nice...@att.net
I keep running into small uncovered areas by one or more building walls
that
may have flowers / grass / or small bushes , but can be all brick / stone.
We refer to them as plaza or courtyard here, and many of them are named.
I
can't find a tag that fits
2009/11/30 Martin Fossdal Guttesen mgutte...@hotmail.com
if you look at the description of embankment on the map features page
An embankment is an artificial bank raised above the
immediately-surrounding land to redirect or prevent flooding by a river,
lake or sea
then i don't think it
2009/11/30 Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com
A house would be building=yes or perhaps building=house. But for a block
or a
larger area, yes, tagging the landuse is fine.
I'd suggest to tag detached house differently from terraced houses and other
typologies, e.g. building=detached (currently 1425
2009/11/30 Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl
On Monday 30 November 2009 22:09:10 Martin Fossdal Guttesen wrote:
I would agree that it is more like a Causeway jugding from the wikipedia
article and images, but i cant find any tag for that, and i dont think it
would render on the map
so what?
2009/12/1 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
I've referred to Jurisdictions a few times for this reason. I imagine US
states are possibly even more individual. Would we go as far as
councils/municipalities? Probably not. (Although, as I mentioned somewhere
earlier, the City of Melbourne
2009/12/3 Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com
Wouldn't those be simply commercial or industrial areas? I think there's no
need to record what kind of product is stocked there, and cars (in that
case) are just another kind of product.
Yes, they would be an industrial area (not
2009/12/21 Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com
Hi
I've slowly started using addr:housenumbers, I'm not really interested
in doing it according to the way the addr:* scheme work atm though..
Because of the amount of work to enter data in that scheme.
are you aware of JOSM-Presets and
2009/12/21 Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
wrote:
Then why don't you use place=locality, name=45-29 if that's all you
want.
Thanks, that's a good idea (if it works),
what do you mean by: if it works? All alternative ways
2009/12/21 Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com
But it is retrieved in the only way I care about namely the rendered
map. It could be retrieved by geocoders as well, with small changes,
it was this change I wanted help with. Note, place=locality seems even
better after what you said, or do you
2010/1/4 Liz ed...@billiau.net
I don't see a mountain bike track as equivalent to a cycleway.
I would specifically exclude a MTB track from cycleway
+1, still I agree with most of the comments above that the proposed change
of the definition would not improve the situation.
cheers,
Martin
2010/1/5 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
Right, I'm not confusing the terms. Some people have used the word
designed in definitions, as in designed for bicycles. That's all.
btw: is there a difference between dedicated and designated?
Legally. Although general practice (I believe) is that
2010/1/5 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
Well, I*M*HO, it's close to perfect. If you (well, a reasonable person with
some common sense when it comes to bike paths - not something Roy would
admit to :)) looked through a map, and every time you saw something mapped
as a bike path, it
2010/1/6 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
maybe you missed NOP's contribution in one of the parallel threads, so
again: your point of view is bike-focused, so you think every way or path
suitable
2010/1/7 Arlindo Pereira openstreet...@arlindopereira.com
1: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Love_Hotel
I like your request and I think this is useful in Brazil. Did you mean you
wanted to start voting?
cheers,
Martin
___
2010/1/8 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com
So the 22,000 highway=cycleway in the UK all need to be changed.
Unfortunately, UK mappers don't seem to agree with this.
well, I'm pretty sure if you'd start today you would have changed them
within some weeks, but still mainly
2010/1/19 Liz ed...@billiau.net
currently the general scheme would be to design a new set of tagging which
does not reuse the same tags and deprecate the tags which are decided to be
in
error
so that over time the happy editors can retag features with new ones from
better set
+1
cheers,
2010/1/20 Peter Childs pchi...@bcs.org
In my book its easy.
Cafe - Place to buy and consume light snacks and NON-Alcoholic Drinks
(Tea, Coffee, Coke etc) on site. Usually Unlicensed.
in many countries you will find alcohol in cafés as well. In a café I would
before all expect a
2010/1/20 David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com
I still think the most important criterion is what the owner of the
establishment says it is, not on the subjective judgement of the surveyor.
+1, might work well in English-speaking countries (and where it applies,
sometimes establishments
2010/1/20 Anthony o...@inbox.org
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/1/20 Anthony o...@inbox.org
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.comwrote:
We map everything we can.
What in the world is that supposed
2010/1/20 Peter Childs pchi...@bcs.org
In my book its easy.
Cafe Usually Unlicensed.
Definitely I would not put licenses and other legal stuff into the
definition. They differ almost certainly in different countries, are of no
importance to the client and hard to research. They might
2010/1/21 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com wrote:
... To meet both problems you can only do this:
alcohol=yes
coffee=no
pastries=yes
egg chips=yes
I like this approach.
yes, it's OK, just it doesn't tell you
2010/1/21 Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.netalan_mintz%2b...@earthlink.net
- cannabis=yes (bringing it back around to the subject of the thread :) )
if that's the question I would tag it amenity=coffeeshop and not
amenity=cafe, cannabis=yes. IMHO the difference between a cafe and a
2010/1/29 Jonas Stein n...@jonasstein.de:
in Germany most public telephones belong to the 'Deutsche Telekom'.
They have usually a label with a field 'Standortnummer 2211234'
I was told until year 2003 you could call +49 for the country
+Standortnummer without the '0's and the phone was
2010/1/30 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Sounds like the right solution is a generalised
highway=traffic_island or something. Can't see that a carpark
island is any different from any other traffic island or raised
section of kerb.
-1, please don't use the highway-tag for barriers.
2010/1/31 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:13 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
... Obviously if
someone wants to spend a lot of time areas would be more accurate, but
in that case it might as well be left as a raster image.
No, because with a raster
2010/2/3 Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net:
by way of context, New York State and some NY counties have cases where
there are roads maintained
by the state or county that do not have numberedsigned route
designations. these roads have numbers
assigned administratively (reference routes)
2010/2/3 Chango640 chango...@gmail.com:
Hi people.
I'm sending this mail in order to propose a new feature for the tag landuse:
gated communities. These are a type of private neighbourhoods that are very
common in Argentina, Brazil and many other countries, and have a notorious
difference
2010/2/3 Chango640 chango...@gmail.com:
I thought about using landuse=residential (which I'm already using in cities
and towns), but here in Argentina there is a strong difference between
ordinary neighbourhoods and gated communities.
Yes, that's what you are expressing with the subtags
2010/2/3 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
On 4 February 2010 08:50, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
AFAIR the barrier=fence should not be applied to an area, what means
in pratical to draw a second way atop the area limits (not really
elegant). Another approach is to tag
2010/2/8 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
Are these buildings conceptually separate (e.g., different building
management or construction dates)? If yes, map as separate areas sharing
boundaries.
I don't know -
2010/2/21 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
Also can anyone think of any other cases that opening_hours can't
describe at the moment?
there is various possibilities:
- the last Sunday in the month
- the first / last / third... wednesday of one specific month
- one hour after sunset
- every
2010/2/19 Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl:
To give an example:
There is this convention centre where the building is drawn from
source=whatever_aerial_image. Then they build an extention on the south side.
So someone changes *part* of the shape of the building from
2010/2/23 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
wide truck. But if it is tagged est_width=3.5, you will not... And let say I
have a bigger truck than yours and is 5 meters wide. How can I find a way if
none of the highways have a width tag ?
are we talking about boats or trucks? If you drive a big truck
2010/3/10 Giacomo Boschi gwil...@email.it:
Greg Troxel ha scritto:
amenity=fast_food has a lot of baggage. In the US, that means
factory-produced not-really-food of mediocre quality that is fast and
consistent. A family ice cream shop is definitely not fast food even if
they can
2010/3/26 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
I think we've heard all possible sides of this argument. You have three
options:
1. Draw areas using same nodes as road - wrong because it suggests the
area is larger than it really is.
good for the database because you need less nodes.
2. Let
2010/4/3 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com:
Is there any alternate tag, other than highway, that would tag such an
overhead structure? If not, what would be a suitable tag?
I have also seen over-street bridges that support conveyor belts used to move
materials between industrial
2011/8/23 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net:
You mean like this?
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/pete.meg/wcc/facility-of-the-month/September2007.htm
Yes :D
Similarly exists in other parts of the world as well:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Radeln_oder_doch_nicht.JPG
The whole
The proposed example value for the historic key does not seem
reasonable. (nrhp:1231313)
I suggest you have a look how the world heritage proposal suggests to
handle reference numbers:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/heritage
heritage:operator=* see below.
2011/8/26 Mihkel Rämmel r...@hot.ee:
repair=working/needs_repair/broken probably a better key would be something
like state/condition because repair is currently used to indicate whether
facility offers repairs for whatever they deal with (condition is also not
good as it is used with roads
there is also the tag network that might be interesting to look at
in this context:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:network
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Public_Transport
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
We have been recently discussing on the German ML about
landuse=residential. In Germany many mappers were mapping subdivisions
/ neighbourhoods [1] with landuse=residential. This led to very rough
landuse information, because in order to keep the (sometimes quite
big) area as a whole they are
2011/8/31 Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com:
I'm a city dweller. We have some (and will soon have some very prominent)
rooftop parks.
That's fine, you can tag them with leisure=park (or maybe
leisure=garden, and garden:type)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgarden
2011/8/31 Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhau...@gmail.com:
First off, I like this proposal too and think it's a long time coming.
But, some references made me go and read the place=suburb wiki page again,
and that tag seems very similar, so can that distinction be clarified? That
is, why would one
2011/8/31 Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com:
I thought the issue was that there are two distinct concepts:
boundaries, where there is some legal distinction and a precise edge
+1
place names, which have more or less indistinct boundaries.
just because they have no legal status does not mean
2011/8/31 Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com:
* Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com [2011-08-31 14:33 +0200]:
No, suburb is actually not necessarily outside the city (in OSM), it
is used for central districts as well.
I've often been confused by the suburb tag and maybe someone can clear
2011/8/31 Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com:
On 08/31/2011 02:40 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/8/31 Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com:
I'm a city dweller. We have some (and will soon have some very prominent)
rooftop parks.
That's fine, you can tag them with leisure=park (or maybe
2011/9/1 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
On 8/31/2011 1:50 PM, Johan Jönsson wrote:
A name to use for tagging stony ground.
I am looking for a denomination to use for an area that have little or no
vegetation so that the stony ground shows. Could there be a tag describing
everything
The proposal New barrier types is open for voting now. It formally
introduces a series of barrier values most of which are already in
active use, and suggests tags for additional measures like RFID-,
biometric, magnetic-strip-card and other access-controll devices.
See the proposal for the
2011/9/2 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
On 9/2/2011 3:40 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
The rendering seems cool with this, and it makes sense. If I draw a
forest,
then draw a landuse=reservoir on top of it, those interested in the
forest's true area can subtract out the reservoir. No
2011/9/2 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
On 9/2/2011 7:36 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
+1, I also disagree. I see landuse=forest as the effective area
covered by trees. Hence I would subtract all other entities within.
Disagree with this. landuse=forest should be the area that is used
2011/9/3 Johan Jönsson joha...@goteborg.cc:
+1 for using one tag for the whole forested area.
Maybe something along the scheme of natural=wetland, wetland= {more detailed
desc.} Maybe natural=woodland?
no, woodland is an area with less dense trees then in a forest (it is
a special ecological
2011/9/4 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
I'm wondering if there's an accepted way of specifying that the sign being
used as a source has been mapped. For example:
maxspeed=45 mph source:maxspeed=sign (node 43920231)
where node 43920231 is traffic_sign=maxspeed maxspeed=45 mph
As far as
2011/9/5 Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com:
On 09/03/2011 07:30 AM, sergio sevillano wrote:
are we mapping reality or for the router ?
The question is at what resolution are we mapping?
IMHO we should try to map at the highest possible resolution (our db
has a ~1cm limit for coordinate
2011/9/5 Johan Jönsson joha...@goteborg.cc:
They have shown a distinct movement from land use-like classes to more
physical
definitions.
The old Bare_Rock/Sand/Clay have been replaced by the simpler barren_land.
!!This could be an alternative approach to the tag-name. Use vegetated or
2011/9/6 Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com:
In the case of traffic lights if the intersection node is marked as having
the proper control (e.g. none, stop light, stop sign, yield, TOUCAN,
PELICAN, PUFFIN, Pegasus, etc), then additional detail is harmless. A
future simple router can route. A
2011/9/6 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com:
If the traffic signals in Europe are directly above where you are
supposed to stop, rather than ahead of that point, then how do you tell when
it is OK to resume moving?
First of all it is not everywhere the same in Europe, it really
depends on
2011/9/6 Petr Morávek [Xificurk] xific...@gmail.com:
as I've stated during voting, I don't think water=* is much of an
improvement in tagging scheme of water bodies. I'm still curious - how
do you tag natural lake that is used as a reservoir of water?
I'd go with landuse=reservoir,
2011/9/6 sergio sevillano sergiosevillano.m...@gmail.com:
the present tagging schema means this crossing is regulated by traffic
lights
(highway=traffic_lights in the intersection node)
the relation proposal connects all traffic lights of an intersection meaning
the same thing
this crossing
2011/9/9 Graham Stewart (GrahamS) gra...@dalmuti.net:
David Earl wrote:
The reason I needed such a tag was to avoid one way arrows cluttering up
the map on those little Y-shaped approaches to roundabouts
This seems like a bad approach to me. (pardon the pun)
If the road flares like that then
2011/9/8 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
On 9/8/2011 10:09 AM, Petr Morávek [Xificurk] wrote:
Well, that's my point - the water key suggest deprecation of
landuse=reservoir in favor of natural=water + water=reservoir, which
imho pretty much messes up the distinction between physical
2011/9/8 Petr Morávek [Xificurk] xific...@gmail.com:
the water key suggest deprecation of
landuse=reservoir in favor of natural=water + water=reservoir, which
imho pretty much messes up the distinction between physical object and
its usage.
which landuse-value does the water key suggest for
2011/9/9 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
On 9/9/2011 7:14 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I also agree with others that those links shouldn't be tagged
junction=roundabout. I'd tag the links into the roundabout in the
example highway=trunk_link, oneway=yes (and maybe even lanes=1
2011/9/14 Petr Morávek [Xificurk] xific...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I would like to open the discussion about determining the admin_level of
administrative boundaries in Europe according to NUTS/LAU division.
Though this probably of interest only for people from EU, I don't think
there is any better
2011/9/18 Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently user Alv is trying to redefine the lanes tag to say that it must
include all turn lanes:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:lanesaction=history
2011/9/18 Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com:
Btw the current wiki page seems to say that you should count cycle
lanes in the lanes tag, something I don't really agree with.
+1, maybe we should specify that lanes is about car-lanes (restricted
lanes like bus-lanes or cycle-lanes should IMHO be
2011/9/27 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
On 9/27/2011 12:40 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
After more discussions on the German ML it looks as if one subdivision
for suburbs (the proposed neighbourhood) was not enough, so we
invented another level in the hierarchy of settlement parts
2011/9/27 Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhau...@gmail.com:
Based on earlier discussions of place=suburb [1], I think it's good to start
from an understanding that suburb as used in OSM does not match the common
understanding of suburb in the US. [2]
+1, yes, place=suburb is not a suburb. I also tried
2011/9/27 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
On 9/27/2011 4:57 PM, Gérard wrote:
Given that studies disagree about what makes a street safe for cyclists, any
tagging would be based not on safety but on how comfortable the mapper feels
while riding in his or her preferred style. Use
2011/9/28 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
On 9/27/2011 7:15 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
There's no consistent same level here. If you split Manhattan into three
strips, Upper Manhattan is on the same level as Midtown. But if you go into
slightly finer divisions, Harlem and Midtown
2011/9/28 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
On 9/27/2011 8:26 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
How? What's wrong with all of the sub-Manhattan entities being
place=neighborhood?
not sure if there is something wrong there, so you could (as local
mapper) decide to do it like this. In other
2011/9/28 Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhau...@gmail.com:
Martin, I'm not sure the NYC example is helping. You mentioned this was
discussed on the German mailing list--can you give some other examples from
Germany (or whereever) about how this might be used? Thanks, Brad
You might have a look at
2011/9/30 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
I am very much against using place=... for areas; if one wants to describe
areas then one should use a boundary tag.
place was from the beginning defined for nodes as well as for areas.
Currently we (mapnik-OSM) are using external data (natural
2011/9/30 David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com:
On 23/09/2011 21:44, David Earl wrote:
Any existing examples of tagging an exterior spiral staircase?
No one got excited by this, so I used
highway=spiral_staircase
on a node (though in principle it could have a circular area for its
2011/9/30 David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com:
On 23/09/2011 21:01, David Earl wrote:
I can't immediately see reference to structures like I have ringed here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Wheelchair_lift.jpg
It is a small platform to lift a wheelchair, usually as an alternative
2011/10/4 dan...@web.de:
Hello list!
In the German speaking forum we have been discussing about tagging commuter
or suburban rail:
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=13907
I really think it is a necessary tag to distinguish it from different rail
transport systems.
Today, I
I also have a proposal running for this kind of feature:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Area#area-steps
According to this proposal you'd draw at least the lower and the upper
border of the steps as ways (possibly with an equal amount of nodes
each)
Then make a relation
2011/10/10 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
I also have a proposal running for this kind of feature:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Area#area-steps
Not sure how we should proceed to keep routing working.
a) Either we'd expect software that prepares OSM-data
pulled this from talk because it was OT there
2011/10/8 Paul Norman penor...@mac.com:
See also http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/131585141 with a
creation date of 2011-09-28.
Should the entire city be tagged with landuse=residential like it currently
is?
IMHO it shouldn't. You might
2011/10/10 John Sturdy jcg.stu...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 3:50 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
Any suggestions as to how to represent some steps...
These steps aren't that unusual I guess, but they aren't a staircase. They
form the edges of a piazza-like platform,
Hi,
I wonder if in this case:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/6/69/Simpleuklanes.jpg
it would not be better to draw 2 ways (and add a relation to say that
you could - against the traffic rules or maybe as a pedestrian - cross
the street from one way to another?
Otherwise there should be
2011/10/11 Ilya Zverev zve...@textual.ru:
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
There was a proposal for tagging type of divider, but it has been abandoned
for several years:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Divider
There is also a proposal for a relation to unify dual carriageways
2011/10/14 John Sturdy jcg.stu...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
What about covered=yes?
or underground=yes which could be a simple filter for all of us who
don't
2011/10/14 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
On 10/14/2011 9:43 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Covered doesn't mean something is underground, just that it has a roof on
top. For example a road passing through a building at ground level would be
covered=yes.
covered doesn't necessarily
2011/10/14 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, we already have location=underground established (see
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:location) and I think it would
be a pity to have more than one way
2011/10/14 John Sturdy jcg.stu...@gmail.com:
I don't think the word location is very good, but then it wouldn't
be the only tag key in use that seems a bit clumsy; I guess tagging is
just far enough away from normal use of natural language words that
we'll have to put up with that.
+1
(I
1 - 100 of 6145 matches
Mail list logo
