Ran into this issue today. They are constructing a new trunk road in an area
I’m mapping, an as is usual for Japan, they build the road in stages,
completing one stage before they go to the next. I know, down to about 20m, the
alignment of the sections to be built - so do I mark the whole road
On 16/07/2015, jonat...@bigfatfrog67.me jonat...@bigfatfrog67.me wrote:
I would say it depends if the untouched land is still in its original use or
not. If it is then mark it as planned, if it’s cordoned off waiting for the
construction to get there then I would mark it as under construction.
I would say it depends if the untouched land is still in its original use or
not. If it is then mark it as planned, if it’s cordoned off waiting for the
construction to get there then I would mark it as under construction.
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
From: johnw
Sent: Thursday,
sent from a phone
Am 15.07.2015 um 00:51 schrieb moltonel molto...@gmail.com:
On 14 July 2015 19:57:30 GMT+01:00, jonat...@bigfatfrog67.me wrote:
Linguistically I would say proposed comes before planned. Planning
your wedding is not the same as proposing marriage!
+1
when you're
sent from a phone
Am 14.07.2015 um 20:57 schrieb jonat...@bigfatfrog67.me
jonat...@bigfatfrog67.me:
but planned routes are ones that have passed the usual planning discussions
and are awaiting construction, which can sometimes be many months or years,
but will happen, short of a
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 15, 2015, at 3:05 AM, Andy Townsend ajt1...@gmail.com wrote:
Some of the proposed highways* are clearly just flights of fancy with no
timescale or money behind them.
Yea, thats true - There are some freeways in California that have been proposed
for 50 years!
On 14 July 2015 19:57:30 GMT+01:00, jonat...@bigfatfrog67.me wrote:
Linguistically I would say proposed comes before planned. Planning
your wedding is not the same as proposing marriage!
+1
Personally I don't think we should routinely display proposed routes,
because they may never come to
Linguistically I would say proposed comes before planned. Planning your
wedding is not the same as proposing marriage!
Personally I don't think we should routinely display proposed routes, because
they may never come to reality, but planned routes are ones that have passed
the usual
On 14/07/2015 18:23, Daniel Koć wrote:
Hi,
We're about to abandon rendering highway=proposed in the osm-carto
(default OSM map style), but we think it's still good to show those
which are closer to be really constructed:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1654
Is
This is a question of language.
The OSM life cycle discussion
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
lists planned as duplicate of proposed. I would agree with that.
As a map user I always like maps that look ahead and show planned roadways,
not only those where you can already see
10 matches
Mail list logo
