Ran into this issue today.  They are constructing a new trunk road in an area 
I’m mapping, an as is usual for Japan, they build the road in stages, 
completing one stage before they go to the next. I know, down to about 20m, the 
alignment of the sections to be built - so do I mark the whole road as 
construction=, or do I leave the section which hasn’t had the ground broken yet 
as “planned”?  even though the road as a whole is under construction and will 
be built?

Section under construction  (official Govt docs)
http://www.pref.chiba.lg.jp/kitachi-do/documents/panf-3.pdf 
<http://www.pref.chiba.lg.jp/kitachi-do/documents/panf-3.pdf>

http://www.pref.chiba.lg.jp/kitachi-do/documents/panf-4.pdf 
<http://www.pref.chiba.lg.jp/kitachi-do/documents/panf-4.pdf>
Half under construction, Right half not started yet.

Javbw

> On Jul 15, 2015, at 5:53 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> sent from a phone
> 
> Am 15.07.2015 um 00:51 schrieb moltonel <molto...@gmail.com>:
> 
>>> On 14 July 2015 19:57:30 GMT+01:00, jonat...@bigfatfrog67.me wrote:
>>> Linguistically I would say proposed comes before planned.  Planning
>>> your wedding is not the same as proposing marriage!  
>> 
>> +1
> 
> 
> when you're planning to marry someone it might be much farther away then when 
> you already propose wedding locations ;-)
> 
> I agree generally though, planned seems more advanced than proposed. 
> 
> Cheers 
> Martin 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to