Ran into this issue today. They are constructing a new trunk road in an area I’m mapping, an as is usual for Japan, they build the road in stages, completing one stage before they go to the next. I know, down to about 20m, the alignment of the sections to be built - so do I mark the whole road as construction=, or do I leave the section which hasn’t had the ground broken yet as “planned”? even though the road as a whole is under construction and will be built?
Section under construction (official Govt docs) http://www.pref.chiba.lg.jp/kitachi-do/documents/panf-3.pdf <http://www.pref.chiba.lg.jp/kitachi-do/documents/panf-3.pdf> http://www.pref.chiba.lg.jp/kitachi-do/documents/panf-4.pdf <http://www.pref.chiba.lg.jp/kitachi-do/documents/panf-4.pdf> Half under construction, Right half not started yet. Javbw > On Jul 15, 2015, at 5:53 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > sent from a phone > > Am 15.07.2015 um 00:51 schrieb moltonel <molto...@gmail.com>: > >>> On 14 July 2015 19:57:30 GMT+01:00, jonat...@bigfatfrog67.me wrote: >>> Linguistically I would say proposed comes before planned. Planning >>> your wedding is not the same as proposing marriage! >> >> +1 > > > when you're planning to marry someone it might be much farther away then when > you already propose wedding locations ;-) > > I agree generally though, planned seems more advanced than proposed. > > Cheers > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging