Could we define boundary=urban then?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
I see, for this you'd most probably need a new boundary type (if it isn't
the same as your administrative boundaries).
+1
type=boundary + boundary=?
Pieren
___
2014-05-27 1:48 GMT+02:00 Fernando Trebien fernando.treb...@gmail.com:
Hello everyone,
From time to time there's a discussion in the Brazilian community on
how to tag an urban perimeter. In Brazil, this is a legally defined
area with some defined characteristics, such as:
- different kind
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
For settlements (in urbanism / settlement geographic terms) my suggestion is
to use place=* on an area.
There is one problem when using place: people start to duplicate data.
What is already present/available in
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know in Brazil, but in Italy or Germany the maxspeed for built-up
areas does not correspond perfectly with the settlement extension but is
indeed yet another thing to consider. It is basically defined by
I like Nelson's idea of using a new value for boundary to represent
this, mainly because the perimeter is not ground truth but an
invisible legal definition that roughly matches the urbanized area.
I was wondering if this concept exists elsewhere so that we can even
propose such value in a way
2014-05-27 15:01 GMT+02:00 Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@gmail.com:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
For settlements (in urbanism / settlement geographic terms) my
suggestion is
to use place=* on an area.
There is one problem when using
2014-05-27 15:37 GMT+02:00 Fernando Trebien fernando.treb...@gmail.com:
I like Nelson's idea of using a new value for boundary to represent
this, mainly because the perimeter is not ground truth but an
invisible legal definition that roughly matches the urbanized area.
IMHO the extension of
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Fernando Trebien
fernando.treb...@gmail.com wrote:
I like Nelson's idea of using a new value for boundary to represent
this, mainly because the perimeter is not ground truth but an
invisible legal definition that roughly matches the urbanized area.
I was
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
That's the point. Is it legal or just the sum of all urbanized
landuse 's (residential, industrial, retail). Does it include
backyards, garden, orchard, etc ? The limit is often clear on the road
(first/last building + road
2014-05-27 17:44 GMT+02:00 Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@gmail.com:
The urban limit/boundary is legal (defined by law) here in Brazil. It
may englobe areas that still lack a specific use or are not yet
populated.
It's not only a simple sum of the landuses.
It determines, for example, the area
2014-05-27 17:53 GMT+02:00 Fernando Trebien fernando.treb...@gmail.com:
The urban perimeter is a major factor used by transit authorities
to establish maximum speeds, but not the only criteria for that. So
yes, you do find a few high speed highways on the urban side and a few
low speed areas
12 matches
Mail list logo
