2014-05-27 15:37 GMT+02:00 Fernando Trebien <fernando.treb...@gmail.com>:
> I like Nelson's idea of using a new value for "boundary" to represent > this, mainly because the perimeter is not "ground truth" but an > invisible "legal definition" that roughly matches the urbanized area. > IMHO the extension of a settlement is ground truth and can be surveyed or gotten from aerial imagery. The legal boundary traffic-wise isn't a boundary actually, rather it is a lot of points (city limit signs) that locally define the boundary for that piece of road. As this is not needed for anything but traffic rules it would make more sense to map it to where it belongs (the individual roads). At least around here there is no such thing as a perimeter for inside / outside the settlement under traffic aspects, there are only points (and those are sometimes moved inward or outward the actual built-up area, just as it seems appropriate under traffic aspects). Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
