From: Greg Troxel [mailto:g...@ir.bbn.com]
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] MassGIS Building Import - process
Jeff Meyer j...@gwhat.org writes:
Paul - I've added a few comments and questions about changeset size
and revert policies on the Import Guidelines Plan Outline wiki
pages.
Are
From: Toby Murray [mailto:toby.mur...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] MassGIS Building Import Start
I'm not sure if this page is actually linked to from anywhere but all
account blocks and the reasons they were put in place are viewable by
everybody on this page:
From: Steve Coast [mailto:st...@asklater.com]
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Mappy Hour suggestions?
Try to find new audiences, this mailing list is saturated with your
target market already. So, try google ads or a banner on osm.org. Work
with existing local groups (e.g. the seattle group had no
A couple of initial comments:
Has some kind of simplify been run on the data? Although most of the
buildings are quite good some of the curved ones are overnoded (e.g.
http://took.paulnorman.ca/imports/massgis/noded.png)
If your documentation conflicts with the requirements of the import
message or a 0-hour block which
forces them to log on to osm.org and read it.
From: Jeff Meyer [mailto:j...@gwhat.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 6:56 PM
To: Paul Norman
Cc: Jason Remillard; impo...@openstreetmap.org; OpenStreetMap US Talk
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] MassGIS Building
CanVec operates with each user using a dedicated account. Using a dedicated
account doesn't mean sharing an account.
From: Clifford Snow [mailto:cliff...@snowandsnow.us]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 8:37 PM
To: nicholas ingalls
Cc: OpenStreetMap US Talk
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] [Imports]
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group
From: Jeff Meyer [mailto:j...@gwhat.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 9:47 PM
To: Paul Norman
Cc: impo...@openstreetmap.org; OpenStreetMap US Talk
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] MassGIS Building Import Start
IMO, the process
From: Alex Barth [mailto:a...@mapbox.com]
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] MassGIS building conversion
On Dec 9, 2012, at 3:51 PM, Jason Remillard remillard.ja...@gmail.com
wrote:
But, in general, I don't think the MassGIS ID's should be included
since they are just the center of mass of the
From: Alex Barth [mailto:a...@mapbox.com]
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] MassGIS building conversion
Hi Paul -
On Dec 10, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
Any future work with the data after it's imported will have to handle
buildings without IDs. I included IDs in two
I'd say the wiki is likely the least used of the various channels for local
OSM communities. Because as part of the DWG I've had to contact local
communities in various ways I've seen (in some kind of rough order
resembling popularity)
- Mailing lists
- OSM.org forums
-
Do you know when youll be proposing this import to the various lists?
From: Pierre Béland [mailto:infosbelas-...@yahoo.fr]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 7:55 AM
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Validating existing data in Ottawa area
Tom
For the Québec
Apologies for the length, but there are quite a few points to address,
some of a specific nature and others more general. Because I'm replying
to points across several messages and the formatting in this thread has
become screwed up I'll be reformatting messages and re-ordering them so
that
From: bruno [mailto:br...@anche.no]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Role of the Wiki
On mer, 2012-12-05 at 05:49 +0100, Roland Olbricht wrote:
- use tags or tag keys that have been used quite often
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/
What if a new way of tagging something gets approved? The
It's worth noting that the results will be in Mercator meters, not meters.
I have OSM loaded into a pgsnapshot db and can run queries on request.
Something else is that tags-'highway' in ( 'motorway', 'primary',
'secondary' ) will NOT use indexes on tags.
tags @ hstore('highway',
From: Paul Norman [mailto:penor...@mac.com]
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Proposed import: Alaska Boroughs/CPDs
Given that the comments received have been generally positive and the
concerns raised are addressed I'm going to go ahead and start post-
processing the data so I can merge it in as well
Ogr will read personal geodatabases with the appropriate drivers so ogr2osm
will read them, so if the legal issues can be sorted out there's no problem.
From: Steven Johnson [mailto:sejohns...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:04 AM
To: Open Street Map Talk-US
Subject: Re:
We've been using CC BY licensed data in OSM. The only potential issue is
that they be satisfied that the attribution is reasonable to the medium or
means You are utilizing.
I would consider that a line saying Hazard Data (C) CC BY foo, Map Data (C)
ODbL OpenStreetMap contributors with appropriate
Actually, the slope is slippery. People have made it about old roads. There
are people who have mapped old roads where they have been completely
developed over and no trace remains.
Mapping the traces of an old rail line isn't historical mapping. If there
are currently traces there then it's
(subject changed because this isn't really about the CPDs anymore)
From: Greg Troxel [mailto:g...@ir.bbn.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 4:48 AM
To: Paul Norman
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Alaska CPD boundaries
I'm sort of answering my own question, but the latest TIGER data has
-Original Message-
From: Frederik Ramm [mailto:frede...@remote.org]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 8:00 AM
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Proposed import: Alaska Boroughs/CPDs
Hi,
On 11/26/12 05:51, Paul Norman wrote:
There is more detail at
http
From: Greg Troxel [mailto:g...@ir.bbn.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 4:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Alaska CPD boundaries
The census bureau divided the unorganized borough into 11 census
areas.
These have no legal significance but serve to sub-divided the state
into
From: Toby Murray [mailto:toby.mur...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Proposed import: Alaska Boroughs/CPDs
I have been doing a lot of work on county borders in the lower 48. I got
to Alaska and the current state of the data plus the whole unorganized
borough thing made me go huh? I'll
From: Alex Sims [mailto:a...@softgrow.com]
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Historical rail lines
On 26/11/2012 10:38 AM, mick wrote:
I'm in two minds about removing 'historical' data.
Yes, objects no longer visible on the ground shouldn't be rendered on
the map.
I've been following this
I've been cleaning up and converting the Alaska admin boundaries and
relations and I've come across two questions where I could use some more
local feedback. I'm not finished yet, I still have to go back and fix some
mistakes (ugh) and de-duplicate more ways.
As no one had touched most of the
From: Paul Norman [mailto:penor...@mac.com]
Subject: [Talk-us] Alaska CPD boundaries
(2) The 3 nautical mile limit (state submerged land limit, traditional
territorial sea claims limit)
I'm sort of answering my own question, but the latest TIGER data has it at
this limit.
I'll go ahead
In Alaska the Boroughs and CPDs are the equivalent of counties.
I recently cleaned up much of the Canada/Alaska border and in the process
looked at the counties data.
I have come to the conclusion that it is better and easier to remove the
existing counties data and reimport from TIGER 2012.
From: Connors, Bernie (SNB) [mailto:bernie.conn...@snb.ca]
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 7:20 PM
To: Bruno Remy; talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Alaska / BC border
You can get the boundary coordinates from the IBC - International
Boundary Commission.
I also checked
From: Mark Gray [mailto:mark-os...@hspf.com]
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Feature proposal: proposed expanded address
tagging scheme for US
In taginfo, I see there is already some use:
86023 instances of associatedStreet
14921 instances of Street
This is still small compared with:
15461897
Aside from the automatically dropped tags there are:
tiger:cfcc
tiger:county
tiger:name_base
tiger:name_direction_suffix
tiger:name_direction_prefix
tiger:name_type
tiger:reviewed
tiger:zip_left
tiger:zip_right
My practice is to drop county if the county relation exists and is
From: Serge Wroclawski [mailto:emac...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Feature proposal: proposed expanded address
tagging scheme for US
Since local conditions vary so
widely across the US, having more tags gives mappers more flexibility
to tag what they see.
How does it give them
From: Ed Loach [mailto:e...@loach.me.uk]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] public_transport=platform not rendered
I'd rather deprecate platform for busses if anything.
One of the problems with the bus stop tag, and hoping I don't reopen old
arguments, is that due to a mistranslation in the wiki in
From: Dan Charrois [mailto:d...@syz.com]
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Internal CanVec conflicts
Usually, in remote areas of the north that I've dealt with, there is
often little else already there than the Landsat lakes. And usually, in
a given tile, there is usually just a handful of lakes.
From: Tom Taylor [mailto:tom.taylor.s...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Internal CanVec conflicts
I've just performed my first edits, in our neighbourhood. One thing I
noticed was that some of the buildings are duplicates. I assume this is
part of what you are talking about when you
From: d...@osmfoundation.org [mailto:d...@osmfoundation.org] On Behalf
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 12:43 AM
To: Paul Norman
Cc: Talk Openstreetmap; d...@osmfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Redaction requests - the information I need
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Paul
From: Pieren [mailto:pier...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 2:45 AM
Cc: Talk Openstreetmap; d...@osmfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Redaction requests - the information I need
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
Planet dumps only
The DWG periodically receives request to redact content from the database.
As the person generally responsible for running those redactions, I thought
I'd share some detail on what information I need to redact something. This
is not going to cover the legal reasons to redact something. Those are
@openstreetmap.org
Cc: Paul Norman; Nicolas Gariépy
Subject: Import Canvec : micro-tâches / Canvec imports micro-tasking
Data import is essential to cover all of Canada, But it is complex to import
Canvec files in areas were data already exist. Both unexperienced and
experienced people may make errors. Import
I was importing some CanVec in northern BC and came across a resource road
on bing, which I also added, but I realized I wasn't positive on the best
tagging.
A typical example is
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=59.395lon=-122.074zoom=16
These roads exist for forestry and oil and gas use. In
From: Steve Roy [mailto:st...@ssni.ca]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 2:58 PM
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-ca] New Subdivisions
What is the best was of adding a new subdivision like this one east of
Kelowna? I've only used Potlatch.
I appear to of found a CanVec 10 bug in 094P13.0.osm
There is a waterway=riverbank way (Dilly Creek) that is split in two at
59.7728641, -121.9806992. One way is 2k nodes, the other is 457 nodes.
Ideally this would be split in two to form two separate areas. An alternate
solution would be to not
From: Frederik Ramm [mailto:frede...@remote.org]
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 4:53 AM
To: Talk Openstreetmap
Subject: [OSM-talk] Planning to retire OSMI's redaction view
Hi,
I'm planning to retire OSMI's redaction view at the end of the
month (unless I hear widespread protest).
From: Tobias Knerr [mailto:o...@tobias-knerr.de]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 12:14 AM
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Licenses for Produced Works under ODbL
On 30.10.2012 13:30, Michael Collinson wrote:
I propose that we base a re-write on:
From: Matthias Meißer [mailto:dig...@arcor.de]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 9:51 AM
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-us] Operation Cowboy - preparations
Hi US community,
4. *Further Imagery*
Is there other or better imagery than Bing for certain areas? How can we
From: Martijn van Exel [mailto:m...@rtijn.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 2:18 PM
To: Richard Weait
Cc: Serge Wroclawski; d...@osmfoundation.org; Ian Dees; talk-
u...@openstreetmap.org Openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Difficult USA mapper(s)
It's hard to come up with guidelines
From: James Ewen [mailto:ve6...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 5:22 PM
To: talk-ca
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Suivi OSM / OSM Monitoring
I see that Canada is pretty good at the admin2 (Country) level, and the
admin4 level (Regions) except for a few islands in the Hudson and James
From: James Ewen [mailto:ve6...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 9:22 PM
To: talk-ca
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Suivi OSM / OSM Monitoring
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
I don't know how it works in the rest of the country, but in Alberta,
once
From: Michal Migurski [mailto:m...@teczno.com]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 12:04 AM
To: OpenStreetMap US Talk
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] What to do with unnamed NHD streams
On Oct 28, 2012, at 11:41 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
From: Michal Migurski [mailto:m...@teczno.com]
Subject: Re
From: Michal Migurski [mailto:m...@teczno.com]
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] What to do with unnamed NHD streams
On Oct 29, 2012, at 12:03 AM, Michal Migurski wrote:
Do you have any sample NHD extracts that might be usable for a test
drive?
All of NHD can be found at on the USGS FTP site,
From: Jaakko Helleranta.com [mailto:jaa...@helleranta.com]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 5:52 AM
To: Paul Norman
Subject: Re: [Imports] What to do with unnamed NHD streams
Hi Paul,
Where can I get my hands on this data / its documentation?
I'm actually most interested about
This is only a partial reply - I should have more detail this afternoon when
I have more time.
From: Ben Supnik [mailto:bsup...@xsquawkbox.net]
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] NHD imports
2. The conversion required running a non-GUI tool, which meant having
command line skills, etc.
This is
From: Nathan Mixter [mailto:nmix...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 1:39 PM
To: talk-us
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] NHD imports
In June, user Bsupnik converted the entire NHD dataset into OSM format.
The files are available at http://bsupnik.dev.openstreetmap.org/NHD. He
mentioned
Background: I'm working on converting NHD to .osm format
NHD is an extremely large data set. It's about 25G of zipfiles and all of
this converted to .osm would total about 3 TB. This is about 10x-15x times
the size of planet.osm.
There are three factors that lead to this large size. The third is
From: Michal Migurski [mailto:m...@teczno.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 8:58 PM
To: OpenStreetMap US Talk
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] What to do with unnamed NHD streams
Does [NHD] all come in shapefile form? The simplification would be a
relatively easy (though time-consuming) task for
Hello,
If you're considering importing you need to read
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines and make sure that
you've followed all of the steps before uploading anything else.
One of these is talking with the local community, which is why I've cc'ed
talk-au@ on this
Just a reminder, if youre proposing to import the admin boundaries, you
need to follow the steps in
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines, which includes not
just talk-ca@ but the imports@ mailing list.
My recollection is that boundaries for statscan purposes sometimes differ
From: Russ Nelson [mailto:nel...@crynwr.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2012 6:19 PM
To: OSM US Talk List
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] NHD Imports
I would like to have every stream in the U.S. available as a .osm file.
So, say, I am running along some road or railroad, and I see a stream
that
From: andrzej zaborowski [mailto:balr...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [Talk-us] press from SOTM US
A related question is whether any agreement like that can be made within
the Contributor Terms. With the thread about the Public Domain OSM
subset when someone said that the PD
From: Frederik Ramm [mailto:frede...@remote.org]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 11:53 AM
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Licenses for Produced Works under ODbL
Another interesting question is how easy the algorithm you specify must
be. It is clear that the
From: Alex Barth [mailto:a...@mapbox.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 4:25 PM
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
Cc: talk...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [Talk-us] press from SOTM US
Fair point. Still - I would ask what is the purpose of this protection
and
Record a list of objects and monitor the minutely diffs for anything
touching them. Additionally, if interested in areas, watch for any nodes
created or moved into those areas.
Bonus points if you get it watching for deletes.
I have given thought to coding something like this - there are a
From: sly (sylvain letuffe) [mailto:li...@letuffe.org]
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 1:41 PM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Standard way across edits to tag changesets
Le dimanche 21 octobre 2012 22:26:56, Marc a écrit :
Hi
Thanks for your proposal. I commented
From: Toby Murray [mailto:toby.mur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 12:59 AM
To: Talk Openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] press from SOTM US
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net
wrote:
we got some. Carl Frantzen of Talking Points Memo
I've been going through my time-lapse photos from the way down to Portland.
A large part of what I'm doing is adding tags to the I 5, mainly lit=yes/no
since you can't get much else at night.
Because I'm editing the tags anyways, I'm stripping off unnecessary or
incorrect tiger:* tags. Often this
From: Jean-Marc Liotier [mailto:j...@liotier.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 11:41 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-talk-fr] Continued aggression against
French contributors (cadastre integration)
Of course, international collaboration requires a common ground and the
Internet has
From: Harald Kliems [mailto:kli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 11:04 AM
To: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: [Talk-ca] Canvec 10 and landcover issues
Hi everyone,
I've done some OSMInspector debugging of areas around Montreal and I've
come across a number of newly imported
violate that law can be put in jail for up to 2 years.
2012/10/19 Paul Norman penor...@mac.com:
Apologies for the message in English, but if I knew Korean I wouldn't need
to send it.
The DWG was informed that a Korean mapper
(http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/sanha) had used DAUM
From: Satoshi IIDA [mailto:nyamp...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 3:59 PM
To: OpenStreetMap Japanese talk
Cc: d...@osmfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-ja] osapon imports
Hi
Please let me confirm one point.
Is it mandatory to using dedicated account to import?
We devided
From: Andrew Guertin [mailto:andrew.guer...@uvm.edu]
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Burlington, Vermont road classification
On 10/18/2012 05:07 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Andrew Guertin
andrew.guer...@uvm.edu wrote:
Hi,
There are two active mappers in the
From: Maury Markowitz [mailto:maury.markow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 1:28 PM
To: impo...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Imports] Importing CanVec better?
Newb here, so I hope this is the right place to ask. I also posted on
one of the wiki talk pages, but I didn't know if
From: Christian Quest [mailto:cqu...@openstreetmap.fr]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 12:58 AM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Semi-automated edits - postal code database
2012/10/4 Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org:
And, btw, you should not use the associatedStreet
From: Dave Hansen [mailto:d...@sr71.net]
Subject: [Talk-us] Whole-US Garmin Map update - 2012-09-26
Does your map cover Mexico/Canada?
Yes!! I have, for the purposes of this map, annexed Ontario
in to the USA. Some areas of North America that are close
to the US
From: Vladimir Vyskocil [mailto:vladimir.vysko...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] All you've ever wanted to know about the french
cadastre
The larger part of cadastre data
is just dumped into the data base never to be touched again by any
mapper.
That's also wrong, the french
From: THEVENON Julien [mailto:julien_theve...@yahoo.fr]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 10:26 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Réf.: Re: All you've ever wanted to know about the
french cadastre
to be allowed to use cadastre data we have to add a source key which is
long about 40 characters to
From: Toby Murray [mailto:toby.mur...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Réf.: Re: All you've ever wanted to know about the
french cadastre
I think the biggest cost for long tags that are heavily used is really
in the planet file size. A bigger planet takes longer to generate, longer
to
From: Martin Koppenhoefer [mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 5:21 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] All you've ever wanted to know about the french
cadastre
Am 30.09.2012 um 02:04 schrieb Paul Norman penor...@mac.com:
in a city where the buildings are joined
sept. 2012 02:13 HAEC, Paul Norman a écrit :
Obviously buildings are part of it, but is there a list of what else?
Hi,
I don't think there is a list.
the information that you can find are highway references,street
names,city boundaries,cemetery boundaries,buildings,house
number
Le ven. 28 sept. 2012 08:00 HAEC, Paul Norman a écrit :
sorry this detailled here in section les differents calques
wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Cadastre_Français/Aspects_techni
ques_du_cadastre_en_ligne
and here qu est ce qui est reutilisable
wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki
From: Martijn van Exel [mailto:m...@rtijn.org]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 8:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Remap-a-tron level 2 complete! Suggestions for
level 3?
Level 4
Tiger unedited roads that are highway residential and have no name.
How many of those are there? They
From: Tony Morris [mailto:tonymor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 10:29 PM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-talk] Pre-delete-bot
Hello,
I am trying to get the OSM data prior to the running of the deletion
bot. I am able to access CC-BY-SA licenced data from
From: Pieren [mailto:pier...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] All you've ever wanted to know about the french
cadastre
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:18 AM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
Conclusion:
A significant number of cadastre imported buildings consist of
multiple ways
From: Christian Quest [mailto:cqu...@openstreetmap.fr]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] All you've ever wanted to know about the french
cadastre
2012/9/27 Simon Poole si...@poole.ch:
Just so there is no misunderstanding: even taking address tagged nodes
in to account, the addresses / houses ratio
From: Richard Fairhurst [mailto:rich...@systemed.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 3:02 AM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Proposal for import guidelines
Tordanik wrote:
If you want to address changes performed by scripts/bots, then why
don't you just say so
From: Olivier Croquette [mailto:m...@ocroquette.de]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] All you've ever wanted to know about the french
cadastre
This is not an example that you only find after a long search; it is a
typical cadastre import building.
My main machine is down at the moment so this isn't as detailed as I'd like, but I have a few thoughts.On Sep 25, 2012, at 10:11 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:A propos of the recent contretemps about Cadastre imports and separate accounts (excessive use of French in this
On Sep 25, 2012, at 01:00 PM, THEVENON Julien julien_theve...@yahoo.fr wrote: The need to keep these conditions open-ended is a weakness that lets detractors claim that they are arbitrary, but I'm guessing that this is necessary to prevent users gaming the rules with stupid technical loopholes...
From: Lester Caine [mailto:les...@lsces.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 11:47 PM
To: 'OSM'
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Import guidelines proposal update
Paul Norman wrote:
From: Lester Caine [mailto:les...@lsces.co.uk]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Import guidelines proposal update
From: sly (sylvain letuffe) [mailto:li...@letuffe.org]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 7:41 AM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Import guidelines proposal update
On vendredi 21 septembre 2012, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Hi again,
This is not about one rule. This is
From: Lester Caine [mailto:les...@lsces.co.uk]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Import guidelines proposal update
who last edited an object! ). Where the import HAS nice unique object
identifiers things are a lot easier, but raw vector data like the French
import, and I think the Spanish data you
From: Pavel Pisa [mailto:ppisa4li...@pikron.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 3:01 AM
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] importing ODBl data
I (for myself strongly demand) that my former and future change sets can
be exported from OSM under CC-BY-SA but I
Sending to imports@ and cc'ing talk@ as that's more widely read than the
wiki talk pages.
From: sly (sylvain letuffe) [mailto:li...@letuffe.org]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Import guidelines proposal update
Or, to make it even clearer, can I commit my change to the wiki without
starting an edit
From: Vincent de Chateau-Thierry [mailto:v...@laposte.net]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Import guidelines proposal update
Hi,
Le 19/09/2012 22:55, Richard Weait a écrit :
- Cadastre is not an import. Cadastre is an import. Could you do
the same thing if there were no Cadastre to import?
The surrey2012 should have some more from the south side.
I'm thinking about going and driving back and forth a few times with my GPS
and my camera set to auto so that I can get all of the exits.
Anyone interested in a driving mapping party?
Of course I'd get to redo it all in a couple
I'm getting it from the City of Surrey.
If you get imagery under a compatible license I could look at hosting it.
City GIS departments generally have imagery but they may be reluctant or
unable to release it. Surrey releases their data and imagery under the PDDL
From: Christian Quest [mailto:cqu...@openstreetmap.fr]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 7:11 AM
To: Frederik Ramm
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Import guidelines OSMF/DWG governance
2012/9/18 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Just to clarify this one point: The
The survey points are based on IBC data (which they view as PD) and are
supposed to be accurate within a few cm and the limits of NAD83 to WGS84
conversion (a few more cm).
I've verified a few by the lower mainland with survey and against a few
sources of accurate imagery and their data seems
with the actual border. See
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.9803
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.9803lon=-121.7579zoom=12layers=M
lon=-121.7579zoom=12layers=M
Paul Norman wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
The survey points are based on IBC
If you want to add additional wording you could do so. Your wording must
make people aware that the data comes from OpenStreetMap and that it is
available under the ODbL.
Of course, you can only use the ODbL attribution after the new planet is
published and you reload your database.
If you
Yikes. I have some tools that will work on the very large changesets, I'll
get around to it tomorrow (heading to bed now).
Also, if there's legal problems it needs to be redacted, not just deleted.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Errington [mailto:erringt...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday,
From: Malcolm Herring [mailto:malcolm.herr...@btinternet.com]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Change to ODbL imminent
On 11/09/2012 17:16, Richard Weait wrote:
About thirty hours later, that newly-generated planet file will be
available
What news?
To quote TomH, a watched planet never dumps.
I've gone and updated the imagery bounds and bboxes for both Potlatch 2 and
JOSM for the North American imagery sources. JOSM should now only suggest a
source if it actually covers the area.
Potlatch 2 will still suggest sources even if they don't cover the area
because potlatch 2 only supports
601 - 700 of 952 matches
Mail list logo
