Vikas Yadav schrieb:
> I made this icon for JOSM.
> My not an artist.
> This is the top with walls on both sides.
Hi Vidas!
I'm not an artist as well.
Anyway, I've took your icon as an inspiration (your icon looked blurred
when scaled down to 16*16 pixels) and added a similar one to the JOSM
d
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Therefore I would explicitly recommend that the way starts at the
> turn-stile following the direction of passing through it, as you will
> never turn back once passed, while you might always turn back before
> you pass it.
You can add this to the wiki as a recommendat
2009/8/11 Tobias Knerr :
> Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>> This can be applied to any way as long as that way needs to be used when
>>> passing the stile. The stile should be a node on that way, but whether
>>> it is the first/last node or any node inbetween doesn't matter at all.
>>
>> I see this d
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> This can be applied to any way as long as that way needs to be used when
>> passing the stile. The stile should be a node on that way, but whether
>> it is the first/last node or any node inbetween doesn't matter at all.
>
> I see this differently as the restriction d
2009/8/11 Tobias Knerr :
> Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>> I'd therefore use something like foot[backward]=no (or whatever syntax
>>> for conditional tagging is your personal favourite) on that footway
>>> leading through the turnstile.
>>
>> does this imply to split the way on the stile? Do you spl
On 11 Aug 2009, at 18:01, Tobias Knerr wrote:
Shaun McDonald wrote:
oneway=yes isn't a good idea, as oneway is generally assumed to /
not/
affect pedestrians. (Or how many of you actually add an exception
for
pedestrians when mapping a highway with oneway=yes?)
The exception being highway
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> I'd therefore use something like foot[backward]=no (or whatever syntax
>> for conditional tagging is your personal favourite) on that footway
>> leading through the turnstile.
>
> does this imply to split the way on the stile? Do you split it on
> either side?
This
2009/8/11 Shaun McDonald :
> On 11 Aug 2009, at 17:39, Tobias Knerr wrote:
>> Shaun McDonald wrote:
Another property that turnstiles have is that usually one can pass in
only one direction. But how that is going to be tagged if a turnstile
is just a node I have no idea.
>>> A footway
Shaun McDonald wrote:
>> oneway=yes isn't a good idea, as oneway is generally assumed to /not/
>> affect pedestrians. (Or how many of you actually add an exception for
>> pedestrians when mapping a highway with oneway=yes?)
>
> The exception being highways that are for pedestrians, i.e. footway an
On 11 Aug 2009, at 17:39, Tobias Knerr wrote:
Shaun McDonald wrote:
Another property that turnstiles have is that usually one can pass
in
only one direction. But how that is going to be tagged if a
turnstile
is just a node I have no idea.
A footway going through it with the tag oneway=ye
2009/8/11 Tobias Knerr :
> Shaun McDonald wrote:
>>> Another property that turnstiles have is that usually one can pass in
>>> only one direction. But how that is going to be tagged if a turnstile
>>> is just a node I have no idea.
>>
>> A footway going through it with the tag oneway=yes?
>
> onewa
Shaun McDonald wrote:
>> Another property that turnstiles have is that usually one can pass in
>> only one direction. But how that is going to be tagged if a turnstile
>> is just a node I have no idea.
>
> A footway going through it with the tag oneway=yes?
oneway=yes isn't a good idea, as oneway
On 11 Aug 2009, at 17:12, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/8/11 Shaun McDonald :
Another property that turnstiles have is that usually one can pass
in
only one direction. But how that is going to be tagged if a
turnstile
is just a node I have no idea.
A footway going through it with the
2009/8/11 Shaun McDonald :
>> Another property that turnstiles have is that usually one can pass in
>> only one direction. But how that is going to be tagged if a turnstile
>> is just a node I have no idea.
>>
>
> A footway going through it with the tag oneway=yes?
yes, or a "helper-object" used f
On 11 Aug 2009, at 16:03, Markus Lindholm wrote:
2009/8/8 Tobias Knerr :
Mike Harris wrote:
And I still don't think turnstile is in any way a type of stile
any more than a stile is a type of gate.
+1
The English word for turnstiles may end with "stile" for some
reason I
don't understand
2009/8/8 Tobias Knerr :
> Mike Harris wrote:
>> And I still don't think turnstile is in any way a type of stile any more
>> than a stile is a type of gate.
>
> +1
>
> The English word for turnstiles may end with "stile" for some reason I
> don't understand, but that doesn't mean it actually is a t
Mike Harris wrote:
> And I still don't think turnstile is in any way a type of stile any more than
> a stile is a type of gate.
+1
The English word for turnstiles may end with "stile" for some reason I
don't understand, but that doesn't mean it actually is a type of stile.
barrier=turnstile is
_foxt...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 27 July 2009 08:47
To: Shaun McDonald
Cc: Vikas Yadav; osm-talk; Karl Newman
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] park barrier
--- On Mon, 27/7/09, Shaun McDonald wrote:
> Then file a trac ticket at http://josm.openstreetmap.de to get one added.
Do we really need to file bugs on all
stile'.
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: John Smith [mailto:delta_foxt...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 27 July 2009 06:26
To: Vikas Yadav; Shaun McDonald
Cc: osm-talk; Karl Newman
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] park barrier
--- On Sun, 26/7/09, Shaun McDonald wrote:
> I think that y
arris
_
From: Vikas Yadav [mailto:vi...@thevikas.com]
Sent: 26 July 2009 17:35
To: Karl Newman
Cc: osm-talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] park barrier
Exactly this: Full-height turnstiles in the same wikipedia page.
Ones here are just a metre high without a roof.
Ill use barrier=stile for
If I understand rightly, this sounds like barrier=turnstile?
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: John Smith [mailto:delta_foxt...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 26 July 2009 16:16
To: osm-talk; vi...@thevikas.com
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] park barrier
--- On Sun, 26/7/09, ヴィカス ヤダワ (vikas yadav
I made this icon for JOSM.
My not an artist.
This is the top with walls on both sides.
2009/7/27 Martin Koppenhoefer
> 2009/7/27 John Smith :
> > --- On Mon, 27/7/09, Shaun McDonald wrote:
> >
> >> Then file a trac ticket at http://josm.openstreetmap.de to get one
> added.
> >
> > Do we really
2009/7/27 John Smith :
> --- On Mon, 27/7/09, Shaun McDonald wrote:
>
>> Then file a trac ticket at http://josm.openstreetmap.de to get one added.
>
> Do we really need to file bugs on all types of stiles? or would it be better
> to list it as barrier=stile and subtype?
well, maybe it's more eff
--- On Mon, 27/7/09, Shaun McDonald wrote:
> Then file a trac ticket at http://josm.openstreetmap.de to get one added.
Do we really need to file bugs on all types of stiles? or would it be better to
list it as barrier=stile and subtype?
> Remember that in OSM you can tag as you like. It is
On 27 Jul 2009, at 04:43, John Smith wrote:
>
>
>
> --- On Sun, 26/7/09, Vikas Yadav wrote:
>
>> btw, JOSM does not recognize turnstile while it had an icon
>> for stile.
>
Then file a trac ticket at http://josm.openstreetmap.de to get one
added.
> there is no "official" turnstile tag with O
--- On Sun, 26/7/09, Shaun McDonald wrote:
> I think that you should use
> barrier=turnstile, otherwise data users will think they are
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stile
"Turnstiles were originally used, like other forms of stile, to allow human
beings to pass whilst keeping sheep or other
--- On Sun, 26/7/09, Vikas Yadav wrote:
> btw, JOSM does not recognize turnstile while it had an icon
> for stile.
there is no "official" turnstile tag with OSM, stile is the same thing.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://
Thanks. changed my gates to turnstile.
btw, JOSM does not recognize turnstile while it had an icon for stile.
2009/7/27 Shaun McDonald
> I think that you should use barrier=turnstile, otherwise data users will
> think they are http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stile
> Shaun
>
> On 26 Jul 2009, at 17:
I think that you should use barrier=turnstile, otherwise data users
will think they are http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stile
Shaun
On 26 Jul 2009, at 17:34, Vikas Yadav wrote:
Exactly this: Full-height turnstiles in the same wikipedia page.
Ones here are just a metre high without a roof.
Ill
Exactly this: Full-height turnstiles in the same wikipedia page.
Ones here are just a metre high without a roof.
Ill use barrier=stile for these gates.
Thanks a lot.
Vikas
2009/7/26 Karl Newman
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 8:16 AM, John Smith wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> --- On Sun, 26/7/09, ヴィカス ヤダワ (vi
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 8:16 AM, John Smith wrote:
>
>
>
> --- On Sun, 26/7/09, ヴィカス ヤダワ (vikas yadav) wrote:
>
>
> > Is there a park barrier like this:
> > Like its made of metal, circular in shape, two
> > perpendicular diagonals separator, rotates and prevents any
> > sort of vehicles includi
Sounds like a turnstile.
It's not yet in the list of barriers, but the list can be extended.
Cheers, Chris
ヴィカス ヤダワ (vikas yadav) wrote:
Hi,
Is there a park barrier like this:
Like its made of metal, circular in shape, two perpendicular diagonals
separator, rotates and prevents any sort o
--- On Sun, 26/7/09, ヴィカス ヤダワ (vikas yadav) wrote:
> Is there a park barrier like this:
> Like its made of metal, circular in shape, two
> perpendicular diagonals separator, rotates and prevents any
> sort of vehicles including cycles to be brought in.
> Only one person can enter at a time.
>
Hi,
Is there a park barrier like this:
Like its made of metal, circular in shape, two perpendicular diagonals
separator, rotates and prevents any sort of vehicles including cycles to be
brought in.
Only one person can enter at a time.
I checked the http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Barrier but c
34 matches
Mail list logo
