Plusbus zones are polygons which are unrelated to the road network - so for Rye
it covers a large polygon defined by straight lines linking each pair of
adjacent nodes on the source list of defining points. The representation of
this along the roads is inappropriate - and certainly not how it
Roger Slevin ro...@slevin.plus.com schrieb:
Plusbus zones are polygons which are unrelated to the road network -
so for Rye it covers a large polygon defined by straight lines
linking each pair of adjacent nodes on the source list of defining
points. The representation of this along the
Christoph
Thanks - if that's the case then I need to look again at the definition of this
particular zone I had alerted the people who had created the data a long
time ago that it could be defined much more simply. So let me check why this
hasn't happened. From memory it should only
Pardon my ignorance, but how do you classify road types?
In the case of Mindanao Ave compared to Quirino Highway, apparently the
former is a wider road so i reclassified the.
Anthony
From:
maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
To:
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Date:
08/03/2009 10:06 AM
I suggest that the tags for
highway=trunk,primary,secondary,tertiary,unclassified be considered as a
function of traffic patterns and not of DOTC designation nor physical
appearance or condition.
These values should also be considered relative to local traffic patterns.
This means that levels
This is a picky little point.
Tagging: amenity=doctor
remains a proposed feature
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Doctor
Proposed features/GP Surgery (tagged as amenity=doctors), which is invalid
according to Rejected features. and apparently abandoned
--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
I expect some equally picky person to tell me that this is
not the JOSM talk
It's the talk-au list ;)
list but before annoying everyone on that list, I thought
that which is the
preferred tag should be decided.
JOSM has numerous tags
Hi,
I have noticed intense discussion about changing how roads should be tagged.
It seems that some people devised their own way how to apply different values
for highway tag and now attempt to force this on everybody.
On the other hand some people are attempting to introduce new values for
--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Blaž Lorger blaz.lor...@triera.net wrote:
I also propose extending instructions for road
classification to use width tag
I agree with everything else you wrote except width since I really don't want
to get a tape measure out and measure widths of roads, using lanes=* to
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 10:59 AM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
I agree with everything else you wrote except width since I really don't want
to get a tape measure out and measure widths of roads, using lanes=* to
estimate widths would be more sensible and is already in use.
+1
I
On Sunday 02 August 2009 10:59:08 John Smith wrote:
--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Blaž Lorger blaz.lor...@triera.net wrote:
I also propose extending instructions for road
classification to use width tag
I agree with everything else you wrote except width since I really don't
want to get a tape
--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Blaž Lorger blaz.lor...@triera.net wrote:
Unfortunately lanes only specifies number of lanes. In
general every road that
is not one way has at least 2 lanes, even if it is narrow,
say 3.5 meters.
Even one way roads can have multiple lanes. Like dual carriage ways :)
--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
I prefere to add narrow=yes combined with residential or
unclassified (or any other) highways. It should be
interpreted as
between 75% to 50% narrower than the default width of this
highway
type.
+1
Am Sonntag 02 August 2009 11:49:11 schrieb Blaž Lorger:
On Sunday 02 August 2009 10:59:08 John Smith wrote:
--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Blaž Lorger blaz.lor...@triera.net wrote:
I also propose extending instructions for road
classification to use width tag
I agree with everything else you
On 01/08/2009, at 7:38 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Well, you can do this, but most routers will try not to use
residential roads if there is another way.
Maybe things are different over in Europe than here in Australia. My
Garmin when using commercial maps and a friend's NavMan are both
that's easy enough to do
It would need to be in rails to go on the main page though, so if any
ruby programmer wants to implement it, I can tell them what needs
doing? (use the zoom level to choose 3 appropriately-spaced points
around the lat/lon, lookup the placenames at each point (optionally
I noticed that for some countries there seems to be more than one node.
E.g. for Slovakia there are 5:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/424313572
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/432425079
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/424315420
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:03 PM, James Livingstondoc...@mac.com wrote:
If we ignore the Australian tagging guidelines, what should we use for
roads that are the same as residential ones but in an industrial area?
According to the wiki, unclassified roads are wider than residential
ones, and
--- On Sun, 2/8/09, OJ W ojwli...@googlemail.com wrote:
You have to make some assumptions about screen size though
- 50.5,-0.2
@z11 on a mobile phone might be 'central london', while the
same query
on Al Gore's array of monitors might be 'europe'
Can't you get screen resolution and then
On Sunday 02 August 2009 11:49:06 Pieren wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 10:59 AM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
I agree with everything else you wrote except width since I really don't
want to get a tape measure out and measure widths of roads, using lanes=*
to estimate widths
On 02/08/09 11:06, OJ W wrote:
It would need to be in rails to go on the main page though, so if any
ruby programmer wants to implement it, I can tell them what needs
doing? (use the zoom level to choose 3 appropriately-spaced points
around the lat/lon, lookup the placenames at each point
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Peter Körnerpe...@mazdermind.de wrote:
I noticed that for some countries there seems to be more than one node.
E.g. for Slovakia there are 5:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/424313572
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/432425079
--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Blaž Lorger blaz.lor...@triera.net wrote:
Specifying actual or at least estimated width is only way
to ensure that data
is universally usable. I guess heavy truck driver would not
be amused when
navigation system would direct him in 3m wide residential
street, while
On Sunday 02 August 2009 11:57:12 John Smith wrote:
--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Blaž Lorger blaz.lor...@triera.net wrote:
Unfortunately lanes only specifies number of lanes. In
general every road that
is not one way has at least 2 lanes, even if it is narrow,
say 3.5 meters.
Even one way roads
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Blaž Lorgerblaz.lor...@triera.net wrote:
Wiki clearly states why tag narrow=yes would be a bad idea
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:width#Using_relative_sizes).
Basically, what is wide for bicycle is narrow for a car, what is wide for a
car is narrow
--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Blaž Lorger blaz.lor...@triera.net wrote:
Main point here is to identify narrow roads. This is where
road width matters
the most. It is obvious that narrow roads will have 2
lanes. Unfortunately,
those lanes will be narrow (2m or less). So number of lanes
will in no
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, Pieren wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:03 PM, James Livingstondoc...@mac.com wrote:
If we ignore the Australian tagging guidelines, what should we use for
roads that are the same as residential ones but in an industrial area?
According to the wiki, unclassified roads
2009/8/1 James Stewart j.k.stew...@ed.ac.uk:
Classifying roads in central asia, it is easier, and makes more sense in my
opinion to use the highway ref in the administrative sense. Some countries
or regions have 5 or 6 main roads with are the national trunk system. In
places they are almost
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, John Smith wrote:
--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Blaž Lorger blaz.lor...@triera.net wrote:
I also propose extending instructions for road
classification to use width tag
I agree with everything else you wrote except width since I really don't
want to get a tape measure out and
On Sunday 02 August 2009 12:36:48 Pieren wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Blaž Lorgerblaz.lor...@triera.net wrote:
Wiki clearly states why tag narrow=yes would be a bad idea
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:width#Using_relative_sizes).
Basically, what is wide for bicycle is
2009/8/1 Christiaan Welvaart c...@daneel.dyndns.org:
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
It seems to be an interpretation problem for the phrase 'administrave class'
then because I clearly argued that who is the maintainer of the road should
not directly influence the value of the
2009/8/2 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
So the question is:
is there anything about a road inside an industrial or commercial area which
would be important inside a renderer or a routing engine
and is different to a residential road?
yes. A residential road should be avoided if possible (slow,
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Blaž Lorgerblaz.lor...@triera.net wrote:
Let's see:
1. There is no clear definition what is narrow.
2. There is no specification for default width of road type.
3. If narrow=yes is not applied everywhere where it should be it is equally
useful/useless as with
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Martin
Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
yes. A residential road should be avoided if possible (slow, dangerous
and noisy for residents / playing kids)
Add for cars. It could be the opposite for cycling as it is writen here:
2009/8/2 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Martin
Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
yes. A residential road should be avoided if possible (slow, dangerous
and noisy for residents / playing kids)
Add for cars. It could be the opposite for cycling as it is
On Sunday 02 August 2009 14:40:09 Pieren wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Blaž Lorgerblaz.lor...@triera.net wrote:
Let's see:
1. There is no clear definition what is narrow.
2. There is no specification for default width of road type.
3. If narrow=yes is not applied everywhere where
2009/8/2 John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com:
list but before annoying everyone on that list, I thought
that which is the
preferred tag should be decided.
JOSM has numerous tags that aren't official
Speaking of which, can anyone think of a better way to put aren't listed on
the map
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
2009/8/2 John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com:
list but before annoying everyone on that list, I thought
that which is the
preferred tag should be decided.
JOSM has numerous tags that aren't official
Speaking of which, can anyone think of a better way to put
2009/8/2 Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com:
Well, when I introduced doctors in JOSMs mappaint (and Christoph to the
Presets), there was a clear majority of doctors and not doctor.
If people use the term doctors, we shouldn't force them to use doctor just
to fit some guideline (not rule)
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2009-February/034241.html
--
m.v.g.,
Cartinus
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
2009/8/2 Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2009-February/034241.html
unfortunately the action taken didn't help to improve consistency and
since Feb the number increased from 1700 to 2700.
cheers,
Martin
___
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
2009/8/2 Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com:
Well, when I introduced doctors in JOSMs mappaint (and Christoph to the
Presets), there was a clear majority of doctors and not doctor.
If people use the term doctors, we shouldn't force them to use doctor just
to
--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
Because it *IS IN USE* otherwise.
It takes very little time to do such a mass change on nodes.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.comwrote:
If people use the term doctors, we shouldn't force them to use doctor
just to fit some guideline (not rule) in the wiki.
IMHO you should change the wiki.
rantIt's much to easy for an newbie to change something on
There is now a talk-alps mailing list. This is for mapping parties, topics and
general discussion for anyone mapping in the European Alps.
This is experiment for a multi-language list for discussion in Italian, French,
German, Slovenian, Romanche and, oh, may be English too. If it does not
Hi all
According to feedback I recived I have add some new featurs to static API.
So now there is a better way of controlling how drawings are drawn
(transparence, thickness, color could be defined for each object
separately, there is a way to put image onto the map). It is also possible
to put
I'm in the Alps right now (summer vacation), mapping Westendorf, Austria :)
Anyone around here?
--Ciprian
On 8/2/09, Mike Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz wrote:
There is now a talk-alps mailing list. This is for mapping parties, topics
and general discussion for anyone mapping in the European
Ciprian Talaba schreef:
I'm in the Alps right now (summer vacation), mapping Westendorf, Austria :)
Anyone around here?
Well, I found out this weekend:
Maps of Austria, Switzerland, Germany ...
for free, oh well, by the russian site:
http://www.topomaps.eu/europe/
some 1/100.000 to
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Lized...@billiau.net wrote:
lots of things sound bad, but we need more than feel good answers to make
good maps.
So the question is:
is there anything about a road inside an industrial or commercial area which
would be important inside a renderer or a routing
http://spacefellowship.com/2009/08/01/interorbital-syatems-tubesat-personal-satellite-kit/
From the article:
Total Price of the TubeSat Kit including a Launch to Orbit is $8,000!
...
Examples of add-on experiments or functions include the following:
▼ Earth-from-space video imaging
▼ Earth
Hi Peter,
I don't think anybody has a reason to object to merging them. At
least me and User:Mala have been merging some of these nodes last week
and we got no blackmail so far :) I believe we went through all the
country nodes which didn't have a name:pl= or name:it= assigned yet so
out of your
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Furthermore industrial areas are
built according to standards that allow easy use with trucks, while in
residential areas you will more often have smaller streets and
straighter curves, which will cause problems to big trucks.
That does not
Patrick Aljord schreef:
http://spacefellowship.com/2009/08/01/interorbital-syatems-tubesat-personal-satellite-kit/
From the article:
Total Price of the TubeSat Kit including a Launch to Orbit is $8,000!
...
You can try the quadcopter too..
andrzej zaborowski schrieb:
Hi Peter,
I don't think anybody has a reason to object to merging them. At
least me and User:Mala have been merging some of these nodes last week
and we got no blackmail so far :) I believe we went through all the
country nodes which didn't have a name:pl= or
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Blaž Lorgerblaz.lor...@triera.net wrote:
To my knowledge there is no such thing as usual highway width. There are
certain standards for width of newly built roads, but those usually increase
over time, which means you will be forced to periodically reevaluate
And by the way, the Key:width wiki page is horrible and could do with
a rework after this discussion.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Marc Coevoetsintsix...@gmail.com wrote:
You can try the quadcopter too..
how would launching a quadcopter into orbit help?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Hi,
I'm trying to build a list of the national osm websites available. Here is the
list I ended with :
Domains with content:
http://www.openstreetmap.org
http://www.openstreetmap.ch
http://www.openstreetmap.cl
http://www.openstreetmap.cz
http://www.openstreetmap.de
http://www.openstreetmap.es
/moved this discussion to another thread as it is not about the topic
in the headline/
2009/8/2 Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net:
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Furthermore industrial areas are
built according to standards that allow easy use with trucks, while in
residential
Patrick Aljord schrieb:
http://spacefellowship.com/2009/08/01/interorbital-syatems-tubesat-personal-satellite-kit/
From the article:
Total Price of the TubeSat Kit including a Launch to Orbit is $8,000!
...
The article also says:
It has three-quarters of the mass (0.75-kg) and
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Roy Wallacewaldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Blaž Lorgerblaz.lor...@triera.net wrote:
To my knowledge there is no such thing as usual highway width. There are
certain standards for width of newly built roads, but those usually
On 02/08/2009, Peter Koerner osm-li...@mazdermind.de wrote:
andrzej zaborowski schrieb:
Hi Peter,
I don't think anybody has a reason to object to merging them. At
least me and User:Mala have been merging some of these nodes last week
and we got no blackmail so far :) I believe we went
2009/8/3 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
Again, width is not less subjective because it is always estimated
(deprecating est_width just hides this point),
actually according to the German ML there is some guys around with
laser-distos to measure the real width.
it is missing in most
of the
Replying to my own email ...
I tried to revert the changesets again, via ssh from a server with much
faster internet connection ... on second try revert.pl terminated
without an error message now, but the ways of the respective changesets
are still there when I download parts of the area in JOSM;
On 2 Aug 2009, at 23:26, Ulf Mehlig wrote:
Replying to my own email ...
I tried to revert the changesets again, via ssh from a server with
much
faster internet connection ... on second try revert.pl terminated
without an error message now, but the ways of the respective
changesets
are
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Pierenpier...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure that the width of what we consider unclassified roads
will double in the next century.
Nevertheless, anything referring to what we consider is more
variable across time and people than the length of a metre.
I never
Hi,
Ulf Mehlig wrote:
I tried to revert the changesets again, via ssh from a server with much
faster internet connection ... on second try revert.pl terminated
without an error message now, but the ways of the respective changesets
are still there when I download parts of the area in JOSM;
2009/8/2 Ulf Mehlig ulf.meh...@gmx.net:
I tried to revert two large changesets of mine (double import of
municipal borders in Pará/north Brazil due to a local network problem)
via revert.pl (fresh from svn); in the middle of the reversal process, I
got the message
GET
OJ W schrieb:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Marc Coevoetsintsix...@gmail.com wrote:
You can try the quadcopter too..
how would launching a quadcopter into orbit help?
That's a small step for openstreetmap,
one giant leap for quadcopters
;-)
Regards, ULFL
2009/8/3 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Martin
Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Certainly it would be even more useful, if there was a definition how
to measure (inside road marking, complete with pavement, does the
lateral paved area outside the
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 06:56, Martin Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/8/2 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
So the question is:
is there anything about a road inside an industrial or commercial area which
would be important inside a renderer or a routing engine
and is different to a
--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Michael Kugelmann michaelk_...@gmx.de wrote:
The article also says:
It has three-quarters of the mass (0.75-kg) and
volume of a CubeSat
= quite small and the capacity will not be suficcient
for appropriate
lens/camera. And I'm shure it is not 3 axis
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 01:29:19 + (GMT), John Smith
delta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Michael Kugelmann michaelk_...@gmx.de wrote:
The article also says:
It has three-quarters of the mass (0.75-kg) and
volume of a CubeSat
= quite small and the capacity will not be
Hi everyone,
I was looking at importing some cemetery borders from Iowa today. I did the
SHP-OSM conversion and fired up JOSM and started uploading. At the end,
JOSM gave me an error saying that the server returned a 500 error code, so I
gave up and went about my business.
Fast forward to just
--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Aun Johnsen (via Webmail) skipp...@gimnechiske.org wrote:
But it can also result in an OpenLunaMap :D
You'd also get a star map too ;)
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Ian Dees wrote:
I downloaded the osmChange file from [1], changed all the create to
delete and tried to upload it with JOSM. JOSM says there's no data to
upload.
I would think you'd have to open a new changeset and upload the
osmChange directly to the API, not from JOSM.
PS: Why did you
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Martin
Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Tag the width of the surface on which users of the way are expected to
travel.
I agree and would like to add: and that is not constricted in the
full usable height
I think the maxheight tag should be used here.
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 01:47:23 + (GMT), John Smith
delta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Aun Johnsen (via Webmail) skipp...@gimnechiske.org
wrote:
But it can also result in an OpenLunaMap :D
You'd also get a star map too ;)
Hubble go home, I have a compact cam :D
--
Brgds
(Sorry, should have reply-all'd):
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Lennard l...@xs4all.nl wrote:
I would think you'd have to open a new changeset and upload the
osmChange directly to the API, not from JOSM.
How would I go about doing that? I suppose I could use curl or something
similar, but
Ian Dees wrote:
How would I go about doing that? I suppose I could use curl or something
similar, but is there a better way?
If you can run perl scripts, have a look at:
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/browser/applications/utils/revert
--
Lennard
Hi,
Ik heb de laatste paar weken gewerkt aan het wegwerken van Keep Right
issues binnen de A10 ring van Amsterdam. Dat is best gelukt, er zijn nog
wat dingen die ik niet kan oplossen zonder er langs te fietsen of omdat
ik domweg niet weet hoe ik het moet oplossen.
Op dit moment zijn er geen
++ 02/08/09 21:26 +0200 - Stefan de Konink:
- Er is een issue voor ways without nodes, zie [2]. Geen idee hoe dat
gedaan hoort te worden. Een way over de area's? Iets anders? Iemand?
Die kunnen we wel handigmatig fixen. Spelen op meer locaties.
Kleine verwarring van mijn zijde. Die ways
--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
move the coral sea islands ;-)
Actually there was no state place tag for Queensland, I've added one since, and
the tiles will update sooner or later.
I also moved the ACT tag, it was going over the top of Canberra, also Canberra
was being
I updated the rendering to show all villages, towns and cities and now the map
is a lot more cluttered to the point of too much clutter, I think I'll make
villages render at a higher zoom, not sure about towns.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Up until recently, that is today, I was tagging regional centres as place=city,
however it might be worth while tagging this as place=regional_centre, or
tagging them correctly and adding regional_centre=yes
However I haven't figured out the zoom levels and how it relates to metres per
pixel
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, John Smith wrote:
Up until recently, that is today, I was tagging regional centres as
place=city, however it might be worth while tagging this as
place=regional_centre, or tagging them correctly and adding
regional_centre=yes
Wilkipedia has a list of australian cities, as
--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
Wilkipedia has a list of australian cities, as determined
by the
administrative bodies.
So if the State determined list of cities says it is a
city, then it is.
Even though we just don't have a million people in each.
That doesn't help with
Forgot to mention can I get URLs of what people expect a map to look like, I
don't want to get into the whole copyright infringment thing, but links to
other people that have won't be our problem.
eg http://www.bilbys.org/session/maps/ubd_sat_ride.jpg
While something like that would be nice,
I just tweaked things to show traffic lights at zoom levels 15-18, are there
any other tags not being rendered that people would want to see on a map? eg
speed camera?
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Are amenity=bench and amenity=bbq being rendered? I don't think there are many
of these around but if they're rendered hopefully people will bother to tag
them.
- Original Message -
From: John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com
Date: Sunday, August 2, 2009 6:33 pm
Subject: Re: [talk-au]
Oh, and is it easy to increase the font size on the suburb (locality?) names? I
think they appear at z10 but they're *way* too small to read.
Rendering the town names at lower zoom levels looks really good by the way.
- Original Message -
From: John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com
Date:
Hey,
amenity=bbq would be an useful one.
railway=platform would be a nice one as well. If you can come up with a
style (I'd suggest one that renders exactly the same way as
highway=footway;area=yes,) you can probably even submit it for inclusion
in the main OSM render. :)
If you're interested,
On 02/08/2009, at 8:20 PM, b.schulz...@scu.edu.au wrote:
amenity=bbq being rendered?
Does anyone know if how to tag those has been discusses before?
Australia seems to contain about an equal number of amenity=bbq and
amenity=barbeque, with a handful of amenity=barbecue thrown in. There
are
--- On Sun, 2/8/09, b.schulz...@scu.edu.au b.schulz...@scu.edu.au wrote:
Are amenity=bench and amenity=bbq being
rendered? I don't think there are many of these around
but if they're rendered hopefully people will bother to
tag them.
Any graphic suggestions?
David Dean, Hughbris, and I had a discussion on IRC recently, and
decided that amenity=bbq is the best. It's the easiest to spell, and
least ambiguous because both barbecue and barbeque are acceptable
spellings depending on locality.
Additionally, David proposed that the additional tag
--- On Sun, 2/8/09, b.schulz...@scu.edu.au b.schulz...@scu.edu.au wrote:
Oh, and is it easy to increase the font
size on the suburb (locality?) names? I think they appear at
z10 but they're *way* too small to read.
Rendering the town names at lower zoom levels looks really
good by the
I finally figured out what the zoom levels equate to in metres per pixel,
although it's probably 100ths or 1000ths of metres per pixel judging by z18.
z0 = 313774583-627549167
z1 = 156887291-313774583
z2 = 78443645-156887291
z3 = 39221822-78443645
z4 = 19610911-39221822
z5 = 9805455-19610911
z6
--- On Sun, 2/8/09, cam_...@fastmail.fm cam_...@fastmail.fm wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-34.075996lon=150.803651zoom=18layers=B000FTFT
Same thing with BBQ's showing.
http://maps.bigtincan.com/?zoom=18lat=-34.07608lon=150.8037layers=B
Just need an icon for benches.
Also
John Smith wrote:
--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Darrin Smith bel...@beldin.org wrote:
Why remove suburb boundaries?
Because they aren't suburb boundaries, they're ABS boundaries.
In 95% of cases they're close enough, are you going to throw out the
baby with the bath water and dispose of the
--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Darrin Smith bel...@beldin.org wrote:
In 95% of cases they're close enough, are you going to
throw out the baby with the bath water and dispose of the
cases where people have adjusted them to be correct? Even in
the places where they aren't they're the closest we're
1 - 100 of 200 matches
Mail list logo
