On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 02:57:29PM +0100, Dave F. wrote:
The pay_scale_area gas just been added around my home town.
The boundary, thankfully, doesn't show up, but unfortunately the name
label does in Mapnik.
Can this be amended to it _doesn't_ display?
Thats a long-standing problem with
Frankie Roberto wrote:
Maybe this calls for a Trolleybus project? :-)
Washington's King County Metro runs trolley buses as a major portion* of
their Public Transit infrastructure within Seattle. Plus, they run
dual-power buses (part of the route is run with diesel power, part with
overhead
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Andrew MacKinnonandrew...@gmail.com wrote:
I am wondering about how pedestrian and car entrances to parking
garages should be tagged.
highway=footway if you're talking about a path for people to walk on
Each is located underneath an outdoor
playing field
On 13 Aug 2009, at 22:07, Liz wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Nick Black wrote:
I'm proposing having an open call on Monday 17th August at 6pm BST
at which
anyone interested can talk through their comments or concerns, as
we did in
Amsterdam during SOTM. I know that this is short notice
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:31:38AM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
... and it is NOT assumed surface=paved. .. we don't ASSUME :) .. instead
we have If no other values of surface is listed, the default value is
surface=paved ... but actually, it should be surface=undefined, as the
Hi!
I don't mind if anybody wants to have a phone conversation on things. Just keep
in mind that most interested people will not be on that phone call and that all
the discussions have to be repeated on this list or on the wiki for the benefit
of those of us not on the call.
Jochen
On Thu, Aug
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 07:56:11PM +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Stefan de Konink wrote:
For this legal reason Stichting Vrijschrift or Stichting OpenGeo could
never apply. Hence there are no 30 members and even with 30 contributors
their is no democratic saying on anything.
I think this
Roy Wallace waldo00 at gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Tobias Knerrosm at tobias-knerr.de
wrote:
David Earl wrote:
If cycleway does mean something different in Germany than it means in
UK, why do we try to use the same tag/value in the first place? Why
don't
--- On Fri, 14/8/09, Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org wrote:
I don't mind if anybody wants to have a phone conversation
on things. Just keep
in mind that most interested people will not be on that
phone call and that all
the discussions have to be repeated on this list or on the
wiki for the
Erik Lundin schrieb:
I think there's a good point of having the redundancy of name:xx tags
even when it is the same as the name tag, because that makes the
translated names more safe. For the Swedish translations I saw several
names that were marked as OK even though they weren't
Micha Ruh schrieb:
Hallo Peter!
Ich habe ein paar Übersetzungen mit Hilfe deines sehr gelungenen Tools
und Wikipedia erstellt.
Dabei ist mir bei der Sprache der traditionellen chinesischen
Schriftzeichen eine
Inkonsistenz zwischen Deinem Tool und Wikipedia aufgefallen: Es werden
Roy writes:
If footway/cycleway is fuzzy in terms of current usage (and I believe it
is), then +1. But I would personally prefer
that designated mean signed. This stays true to mapping what is on the
ground, and separates legal issues from
geographical/physical features, as others have
The problem is that some of us follow the wiki advice re designated= which
was developed after a lot of discussion in this group!
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Ddesignated
Designated= does not mean signed. Signed= could of course be an additional
tag - so long as we know what
Not that I would suggest that we emulate the Ordnance Survey (;) - but in
England and Wales the OS map is currently the only readily accessible map that
tells normal walkers, cyclists and riders where they may go. Bear in mind we
have no 'jokamiehenoikeus'/'allmannsrät' in this country, i.e. in
Good idea - but can we do it simply by adding the stub of a way at the
relevant point?
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Morten Kjeldgaard [mailto:m...@bioxray.au.dk]
Sent: 13 August 2009 23:34
To: Talk Openstreetmap
Subject: [OSM-talk] OSM status POIs?
I realized when mapping
+1
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Nop [mailto:ekkeh...@gmx.de]
Sent: 13 August 2009 23:43
To: Roy Wallace
Cc: talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway
Hi!
Roy Wallace schrieb:
If footway/cycleway is fuzzy in terms of current usage (and I
believe it
... That is current practice - there is no implication of exclusivity only
that a legal right of use exists for a class of users. A restricted byway in
England and Wales is for example, foot=designated, horse=designated,
bicycle=designated (as there are legal rights for all non-motorised
traffic);
'gewidmet' does best translate as 'dedicated' - but in English law that is
something different to 'designated' (at least as 'designated' is defined on the
wiki). In practice, 'dedicated' can mean the process by which something becomes
'designated' (in this context) OR it can mean a path that a
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:56:03 +0200, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:08 AM, andrzej zaborowskibalr...@gmail.com
wrote:
The instructions at the top of the pages could also mention the
official_name:* tags - I don't know if these are approved in any way
but I found they
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
highway=footway (not suitable)
bicycle=dedicated (signed)
A footway for cycling is not a valid combination to me.
why not? In Germany: sign footway + additional sign: Fahrräder frei
That's yes, not designated.
Silly question, maybe: but, what does yes actually
You seem to be implying that increasing the amount of data in OSM is a
bad thing???
Increasing the amount of _implicit_ data surely is. There are good reasons, why
putting implicit data into databases is usually avoided.
Of course, llama access restrictions probably aren't a top priority,
The core issue here (that I believe we agree on) is that if tags have
inconsistent implications, they must be made explicit.
Absolutely true: explicit in the wiki ;-)
I don't think the wiki is a good place for that. Keep in mind that these
defaults would be nice to have in a
http://twitpic.com/djyxb
This is Ash Kyd's photo, and I'm not sure if he's on this list.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
I would prefer that designated does not infer exclusively
designated, so that it's possible to have bicycle=designated as well
as foot=designated on a shared pathway (signed with a picture of a
person and a picture of a bicycle).
Agree here. UK bridleways for instance should have foot=designated;
Marc Schütz schrieb:
What is the opinion for translations that are the same in other
languages? For
instance: Andorra is Andorra in a lot of languages. Do you add a
translation
even though the translation is the same as the original name?
Maarten
No, just mark it as ok. If there's an
Hi!
Nick Whitelegg schrieb:
I would prefer that designated does not infer exclusively
designated, so that it's possible to have bicycle=designated as well
as foot=designated on a shared pathway (signed with a picture of a
person and a picture of a bicycle).
Agree here. UK bridleways for
2009/8/14 Mike Harris mik...@googlemail.com:
The problem is that some of us follow the wiki advice re designated= which
was developed after a lot of discussion in this group!
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Ddesignated
If it ain't
broke don't fix it?
IMHO it IS BROKEN. The
Am 14. August 2009 13:34 schrieb Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
I understand your concerns when looking at the country-level, but what
should we do on the city-level? add the name of all cities in all
languages as a translation? Or: what should we do with the languages
that are not
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
Am 14. August 2009 13:34 schrieb Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
I understand your concerns when looking at the country-level, but what
should we do on the city-level? add the name of all cities in all
languages as a translation? Or: what should we do with
2009/8/14 Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org:
Hi!
I don't mind if anybody wants to have a phone conversation on things. Just
keep
in mind that most interested people will not be on that phone call and that
all
the discussions have to be repeated on this list or on the wiki for the
benefit
2009/8/14 Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
Am 14. August 2009 13:34 schrieb Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
I understand your concerns when looking at the country-level, but what
should we do on the city-level? add the name of all cities in all
2009/8/14 Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk:
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
highway=footway (not suitable)
bicycle=dedicated (signed)
A footway for cycling is not a valid combination to me.
why not? In Germany: sign footway + additional sign: Fahrräder frei
That's yes, not
2009/8/14 andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com:
Alternatively we could mark places already mapped, using stickers in
annoying colours that you'd carry in rolls.
That's really a cool idea. On the sticker there could be some
advertising for the project (this street has been mapped in
Tend to agree in part - I think the 'official' bit is actually redundant? Would
this improve the page?
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Martin Koppenhoefer [mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com]
Sent: 14 August 2009 12:54
To: Mike Harris
Cc: Jukka Rahkonen; talk@openstreetmap.org
2009/8/14 Jukka Rahkonen jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi:
First of all we need to get rid of all the fuzzy traffic signs broadcasted all
over the world, like this
http://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiedosto:Py%C3%B6r%C3%A4tie_422.svg
and this
On Friday 14 August 2009 00:31:38 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/8/13 Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com:
surface earth Probably the same as surface=ground
should be change to the same as surface=dirt
yes, clean up a little bit: dirt, mud, earth, ground seem all the same
to me (I
Mappers have in the past put in stubs with a few nodes tailing off, to
state that there is something here that needs to be surveyed further.
Shaun
On 14 Aug 2009, at 09:52, Mike Harris wrote:
Good idea - but can we do it simply by adding the stub of a way at the
relevant point?
Mike Harris
2009/8/14 Blaž Lorger blaz.lor...@triera.net:
I usually tag paved road segment adjacent to unpaved road segment as paved.
Otherwise it is all too easy to combine road segments without any warning from
editor.
I often do the same, if I got the impression that it is not completely
clear from the
2009/8/14 Florian Lohoff f...@rfc822.org:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:31:38AM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
type of ways - I see a lot of bloat coming when people start tagging
access = yes
bicycle = yes
foot = yes
layer = 0
maxspeed = 30
OSM,
Next weekend, 22nd/23rd August OpenStreetMap's main servers will be
unavailable due to electrical maintenance works at University College
London.
www.openstreetmap.org [1] and the API will be unavailable during this
period from approximately 5am GMT Saturday August 22nd until 10pm GMT
When I have seen unmapped roads, I've put a small stub and on the end
node of that stub I've put todo=continues as a tag.
What would be great was if this tag (or another one like it) could be
rendered on the map with ellipsis or whatever. That helps both the
mapper, who then knows where to start
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Martin Norbäck wrote:
Another good tag would be todo=estimated for roads that are not
properly surveyed, but only estimated.
How about source=estimated?
--
-
Joseph Scanlan
+1-702-455-3679
2009/8/14 Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk:
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 13:08 +0200, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
[In Norway you can legally cycle on footways; in England you can't]
Using the designated value appropriately would work with both. In
England, tag with highway=path (or track);
Le vendredi 14 août 2009 à 15:02, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
but IMHO it is an error in the editors not to warn
you, if tags are added in a combine-action (not only on contradictory
tags should warn). I already filed a trac-ticket for JOSM some time
ago.
+1
I've had the problem some month
www.openstreetmap.org [1] and the API will be unavailable during this
period from approximately 5am GMT Saturday August 22nd until 10pm GMT
Sunday August 23rd.
Please pass this message onto the local OSM lists.
1: www.openstreetmap.org will be replaced by a simple notice website
during
I'm using highway=road stubs with a fixme=continuation tag. Both show up in
validators so they get attention if anyone is there mapping.
See e.g. http://osm.org/go/0eHp_Ibf-?layers=0B00FTF
Konrad
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Are there any progress on the left/right situation on cycleway=lane/track that
are only on one side of the street? I've seen the proposal of e.g.
cycleway:left, but as far as I know it's only a proposal and I can see the
problem of using such sub-keys.
Is there a system that is rendered?
I know RC helicopters as potential aerial photo source has been
discussed before, but today I read about some helicopter from DraganFly
and didn't find anything about them on the lists. They seem to be very
interesting for our purposes.
http://www.draganfly.com/
/Erik
2009/8/14 Konrad Skeri kon...@skeri.com:
Are there any progress on the left/right situation on cycleway=lane/track that
are only on one side of the street?
yes, there is a solution for cycleway=track. Map it separately and tag
highway=cycleway. track can be considered deprecated ;-)
cheers,
Erik Lundin schreef:
I know RC helicopters as potential aerial photo source has been
discussed before, but today I read about some helicopter from DraganFly
and didn't find anything about them on the lists. They seem to be very
interesting for our purposes.
http://www.draganfly.com/
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/8/14 Konrad Skeri kon...@skeri.com:
Are there any progress on the left/right situation on cycleway=lane/track
that
are only on one side of the street?
yes, there is a solution for cycleway=track. Map it separately and tag
highway=cycleway. track can be
Stefan de Cronin wrote
Erik Lundin schreef:
I know RC helicopters as potential aerial photo source has been
discussed before, but today I read about some helicopter from DraganFly
and didn't find anything about them on the lists. They seem to be very
interesting for our purposes.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
SLXViper schreef:
This won't happen if you develop your own one ;)
We started with two and half Mikrokopter; the arrogance that we have
faced in that project. Unbelievable.
Now we are facing something real; Quadcopters are relatively great for
in
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Nick
Whiteleggnick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk wrote:
Silly question, maybe: but, what does yes actually mean? Everyone seems
to use it differently; it was intended originally for a legal right but in
practice has been used in a range of scenarios. In this
Stefan de Konink wrote:
SLXViper schreef:
This won't happen if you develop your own one ;)
We started with two and half Mikrokopter; the arrogance that we have
faced in that project. Unbelievable.
Additionally, mikrokopter has quite a lot of design flaws. Rather
low-power brushless motors
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Roy Wallacewaldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
To me, cycleway means path, designated means signed, and bicycle=yes
means it's suitable for bikes. So if you have a path that is suitable
for a bicycle but does not have a sign with a bicycle, I would use
highway=path
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Mike Harrismik...@googlemail.com wrote:
Tend to agree in part - I think the 'official' bit is actually redundant?
Would this improve the page?
I'm not sure you'd be successful in removing 'official' altogether,
but I think it could do with some clarification,
I don't really understand what you mean by open source here. If you
buy an RC helicopter, aren't you free to do whatever you want with it?
/Erik
Stefan de Konink skrev:
If you want to go Quadcopter I strongly suggest to go for a real open
source project. Because you will not realise how
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Mike Harrismik...@googlemail.com wrote:
The problem is that some of us follow the wiki advice re designated= which
was developed after a lot of discussion in this group!
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Ddesignated
Designated= does not mean
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
SLXViper schreef:
Stefan de Konink wrote:
SLXViper schreef:
This won't happen if you develop your own one ;)
We started with two and half Mikrokopter; the arrogance that we have
faced in that project. Unbelievable.
Additionally, mikrokopter
It is really an excellent idea. I was planning to organize a walking
paper mail out in my home town in a few months to see how it could
work out. I was planning in my case to contact the mayor office to
see if I could coordinate with them if they were interested.
The idea of postcard is very
Agree here. UK bridleways for instance should have foot=designated;
horse=designated; bicycle=designated as all three have equal right. It
would be a mistake to assume the horse rights are greater than
foot/bicycle; they are not.
I would similarly guess the shared foot/cycleways in Germany
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Erik Lundin schreef:
I don't really understand what you mean by open source here. If you
buy an RC helicopter, aren't you free to do whatever you want with it?
Typically an RC helicopter is not really what you want when you are
flying to make
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Lized...@billiau.net wrote:
http://twitpic.com/djyxb
This is Ash Kyd's photo, and I'm not sure if he's on this list.
highway=path; bicycle=designated; foot=designated; surface=ground.
Not sure about width=* :)
___
2009/8/15 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
Could the definition of official be simplified to signed?? If not,
what would be the difference between bicycle=official and
bicycle=signed?
As I have understood, official is intended to tag the formal
dedication (usually of the local administration
Mooi Roeland! Dit soort dingen is idd prachtig om osm aan de man te
brengen :-)
Nog een opmerking:
- je zou in de tekst over zoomen even kunnen vertellen dat je met de
muisknop OF met een shift-muis-drag kunt inzoomen
- je zou de zoombar alleen kunnen opnemen/tonen in het 'aanmaken deel',
en
--- On Fri, 14/8/09, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
then we could have an editing fight, and I'm not going to
do that
I ended up reverting the sections on residential/unclassified for the same
reason.
the urban use notice has changed considerably by the
placing of unclassified
http://images.businessweek.com/ss/09/08/0812_data_visualization_heroes/3.htm
--
_
Jim Croft ~ jim.cr...@gmail.com ~ +61-2-62509499 ~
http://www.google.com/profiles/jim.croft
... in pursuit of the meaning of leaf ...
... 'All is leaf' ('Alles ist Blatt') - Goethe
http://matt.sandbox.cloudmade.com/?lon=-0.09465layers=B0lat=-27.475989lng=153.091049zoom=12layer=3
Shows the progress of adding street addressing.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Hi All,
Corryong Airport has only one runway, OSM has two.
The correct runway is running about 80 degrees 240 degrees. The north west -
south east one does not exist.
Graeme Wilson VK1RE
0400 447 429
_
Use Windows Live
Hi All,
Check the Snowy Valley Hwy around Khancoban. There are two of them.
Graeme Wilson VK1RE
0400 447 429
_
Looking for a place to rent, share or buy this winter? Find your next place
with Ninemsn property
--- On Fri, 14/8/09, Graeme Wilson wandere...@live.com.au wrote:
Corryong Airport has only one runway, OSM has two.
The correct runway is running about 80 degrees 240 degrees.
The north west - south east one does not exist.
I just had a look, the erronus runway is sourced as yahoo
--- On Fri, 14/8/09, Graeme Wilson wandere...@live.com.au wrote:
Check the Snowy Valley Hwy around Khancoban. There are two
of them.
I'm not familiar with the that part of the country, can you give me a rough
lat/lon or can you copy and paste the permalink from openstreetmap.org?
--- On Sat, 15/8/09, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
From: Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com
Subject: [OSM-dev] Server Down Time - 22nd to 23rd August 2009
To: Talk Openstreetmap t...@openstreetmap.org, osmdev
d...@openstreetmap.org
Date: Saturday, 15 August, 2009,
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Hugh Barnes wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:14:40 +1000
Hugh Barnes list@hughbris.com wrote:
I've never found a list of members anywhere. I never received any
acknowledgement except in receipt for the payment I made. Not
particularly complaining, just wonder why.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Matt Whitemattwh...@iinet.com.au wrote:
Liz wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Matt White wrote:
Hey, out of interest, how many people on this list are OSMF members?
me
I probably should have kicked it off and said I am a member as well
... me too.
G.
--
On 14/08/2009, at 7:26 PM, John Smith wrote:
The problem is some/all routing software doesn't treat residential
as through roads, but do treat unclassified as through roads.
Effectively highway=residential means highway=[residential|
unclassified] and access=destination.
I realise we're
At least one group of people coming up from bris may be running a little late
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
--- On Sat, 15/8/09, James Livingston doc...@mac.com wrote:
I see it as exactly the same thing, you're tagging it so
that it works
better with certain pieces of software, due to that making
incorrect
assumptions. Although it may practically do so in some
parts of
europe,
Personally I like
Ref=56
Network=au_nh
Over
Ref=NH56
Because the ref really is 56.
-Ben.
-Original Message-
From: John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com
Sent: 14 August 2009 22:26
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [talk-au] I've been trying to fix the highway shields and came across
No próximo final de semana, 22 e 23 agosto, os servidores principais
do OpenStreetMap serão desligados devido à manutenção elétrica na
Universidade College in Londres.
www.openstreetmap.org [1] e a API estarão indisponíveis durante esse
período desde aproximadamente 2h da manhã de sábado até às
Hallo,
die neuen daten vom 12.08.09 liegen wie immer zum Download bereit auf:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Computerteddy
--
Viele Gruesse
Computerteddy
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 06:08:47PM +0200, Holger s...@der wrote:
Dabei ist mir die Frage gekommen, ob es ein Tool gibt, dass die bereits
erfassten Hausnummern auflisten kann, um zu sehen, ob eventuell eine
Hausnummer vergessen wurde.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:30:46PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 13. August 2009 22:06 schrieb Thomas Reincke m...@thomas-reincke.de:
Was ich daran schwierig finde. Es können auch deutlich breitere
Fahrzeuge auf solch einer Fahrbahn fahren. Auf einem 1,80 m Weg sollte
ein 2,50 m
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 14. August 2009 00:00 schrieb Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de:
Wenn es irgendwann mal mehr Stile gibt, wird auch die Nutzung einfacher. Nur
sehe ich momentan eben nicht, dass sich ausser den JOSM-Entwicklern jemand
die Mühe macht
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Ulf Lamping wrote:
- Die StartUp-Seite wird, genau wie die Hilfe-Seite vom Server geladen und
(unverändert) angezeigt. Solange wir generell Online-Zugriff gestatten
(und der Trend geht ja auch in anderen Bereichen in diese Richtung) sind
die entsprechenden
Hi!
Fips Schneider schrieb:
ÖPNV-Karte hat ein Problem, der fehlen einfach Daten. In ganz Deutschland
wird kein ÖPNV mehr dargestellt auf neugerenderten Karten, teilweise fehlen
sogar Straßen oder Schienenverbindungen (und ja, ich habe meine Gegenden
darauf überprüft, Daten sind in Ordnung,
Und der aktuelle JOSM Bug, dass die Layer-Reihenfolge nicht
mehr beachtet wird machts auch nicht gerade leichter.
So muss ich immer den Datenlayer temporär unsichtbar schalten
um das GPX File mit den Fehlerwegen zu sehen.
Ist in der latest (1979) gefixed. Danke!
Chris
Holger s...@der (hs69...@web.de)schrieb:
Dabei ist mir die Frage gekommen, ob es ein Tool gibt, dass die
bereits erfassten Hausnummern auflisten kann, um zu sehen, ob
eventuell eine Hausnummer vergessen wurde.
Es sollte auch anzeigen, ob das Haus mit der fehlenden Hausnummer
vergessen zu taggen,
Johannes Huesing (johan...@huesing.name)schrieb:
malenki o...@malenki.ch [Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 05:07:45PM CEST]:
[...]
Teilweise zusätzlich natural:tree:type=$Baumsorte, wenn die Allee aus
einer Art Bäumen bestand.
für natural=tree existiert name:botanical, kannst Du das nicht
übernehmen?
Ich
Am 14. August 2009 14:47 schrieb malenki o...@malenki.ch:
Holger s...@der (hs69...@web.de)schrieb:
Dabei ist mir die Frage gekommen, ob es ein Tool gibt, dass die
bereits erfassten Hausnummern auflisten kann, um zu sehen, ob
eventuell eine Hausnummer vergessen wurde.
Es sollte auch anzeigen,
Am 14. August 2009 09:30 schrieb Florian Lohoff f...@rfc822.org:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:30:46PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 13. August 2009 22:06 schrieb Thomas Reincke m...@thomas-reincke.de:
ja, auch nicht zu vergessen: die Breite muss über die volle Höhe (also
in der Regel
Hallo,
am 22./23.8. werden die OSM-Server (www.openstreetmap.org und API)
nicht erreichbar sein. Der Tile-Server wird vielleicht irgendwie
weiterlaufen koennen, das ist noch unklar. Grund sind Wartungsarbeiten
am Stromnetz der Uni, die die Server beherbergt.
Bye
Frederik
Hi,
wie hier zu lesen werden die OpenStreetMap-Server am nächsten
Wochenende, am 22. und 23. August, nicht verfügbar sein, weil
elektrische Arbeiten im UCL, wo die Server stehen, durchgeführt werden.
Währenddessen werden auch neue OSM-Server installiert.
osm.org und die API sind während dieser
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 04:56:14PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
ich habe nur Wikipedia als Quelle, aber da steht im Text 4,50 und im
Schaubild 4,20:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stra%C3%9Fenquerschnitt#Grundma.C3.9Fe
StVZO
http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stvzo/__32.html
(2)
Am 14. August 2009 17:21 schrieb Florian Lohoff f...@rfc822.org:
Es lassen sich zitate finden die eben sagen = 4,20 muss markiert werden -
die hoehe
soll 4,50 betragen ...
*Grmpf*
Flo
ja, in proprietären Quellen, habe auch noch mal ein bisschen recherchiert ;-)
Gruß Martin
2009/8/14 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Hallo,
am 22./23.8. werden die OSM-Server (www.openstreetmap.org und API)
nicht erreichbar sein. Der Tile-Server wird vielleicht irgendwie
weiterlaufen koennen, das ist noch unklar. Grund sind Wartungsarbeiten
am Stromnetz der Uni, die die
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
2009/8/14 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Hallo,
am 22./23.8. werden die OSM-Server (www.openstreetmap.org und API)
nicht erreichbar sein. Der Tile-Server wird vielleicht irgendwie
weiterlaufen koennen, das ist noch unklar. Grund sind Wartungsarbeiten
am
Am 14. August 2009 17:41 schrieb Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
Weiss jemand, wie die derzeitige Serverkonfiguration ist, bzw. wieviel
größer/besser die neuen Server bzw. Upgrades sind?
Steht am Ende der englischen Mail:
2: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Servers/Upgrades/082009
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
Am 14. August 2009 17:41 schrieb Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
Weiss jemand, wie die derzeitige Serverkonfiguration ist, bzw. wieviel
größer/besser die neuen Server bzw. Upgrades sind?
Steht am Ende der englischen Mail:
2:
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
