Hi, I wonder if any transit map is available like openstreetmap.org and
opencyclemap.org. I tried opentransitmap.org without success:-)
Cheers.
Bin
--
Bin Jiang
Division of Geomatics, KTH Research School
Department of Technology and
Bin Jiang bin.ji...@hig.se schrieb:
Hi, I wonder if any transit map is available like openstreetmap.org
and opencyclemap.org. I tried opentransitmap.org without success:-)
Try http://www.öpnvkarte.de/ Although, I am not sure how much of the
world is covered.
Cheers,
Christoph
Cheers.
Bin
HI, looks wonderful, but where can I down the transit data? Sorry for if
its a naive question.
Cheers.
Bin
Christoph Böhme wrote:
Bin Jiang bin.ji...@hig.se schrieb:
Hi, I wonder if any transit map is available like openstreetmap.org
and opencyclemap.org. I tried opentransitmap.org
On 29 Sep 2009, at 20:20, Bin Jiang wrote:
HI, looks wonderful, but where can I down the transit data? Sorry
for if
its a naive question.
The routes are encoded in OSM as relations.
Here is an example bus route:-
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/190701
Regards,
Peter
I just had a look at the map. It's a bit slow, anyway we can update
and speed things up?
Or can we port it to another server?
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Andre Marcelo-Tanner
an...@enthropia.com wrote:
Ah here we go, managed to import their KML into Umapper, so now we can
see the map
Hello,
More information:
Typhoon Ketsana[1] brought massive flooding to the Philippines. In just 12
hours, rainfall to Metropolitan Manila has brought more water than the
monthly September average and has broken a 1967 rainfall record. There has
been already around 240 people who are confirmed
Ack... I only realized now that I send this email to the wrong list. This
should have gone to the main OSM mailing list.
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello all,
This mail has nothing directly to do with OSM but I would like to appeal
for
Hi maning,
The Ondoy situation maps on Google Maps My Maps (
http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8hl=enmsa=0msid=110868206150348750692.00047479b6400ee29bd89ll=14.645791,121.107874spn=0.107954,0.154324)
is the most publicized webmap there is. It shows the locations of people
needing immediate
Thanks, I'm looking at these maps right now. Are the reported
cases/placemarks being closed if the missing person was found? The
placemarks it looks overwhelming but some reports were filed 3 days
ago, are these people still missing.
What I have in mind is a simple portal for post disaster
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:04 PM, James Livingston doc...@mac.com wrote:
On 28/09/2009, at 11:16 PM, Gustav Foseid wrote:
Well... There is no copyright that expires after 15 years. Sui
generis database rights expire after 15 years, but copyright is
hardly very relevant for an OpenStreetMap
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
James Livingston wrote:
On 28/09/2009, at 11:16 PM, Gustav Foseid wrote:
Well... There is no copyright that expires after 15 years. Sui
generis database rights expire after 15 years, but copyright is
hardly very
Hi,
How long time ODbL will protect the data? The EU database directive Directive
96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the
legal protection of databases gives 15 years protection
Article 10
Term of protection
1. The right provided for in Article 7 shall
El Martes, 29 de Septiembre de 2009, Jukka Rahkonen escribió:
How long time ODbL will protect the data? The EU database directive
Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11
March 1996 on the legal protection of databases gives 15 years protection
The thing to
David Paleino wrote:
David Paleino wrote:
http://osm.org/go/xZaERTJSm--
Ah, I forgot also this one:
http://osm.org/go/xZYvzIcHP--
NOT THE WAY TO DO IT!
I zoomed out and noticed that the national border along the Mediterranean
coast of Sicily and the rest of Italy and also France
-Original Message-
From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Dave F.
Sent: 28 September 2009 20:47
Cc: OSM Talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Flickr Now Supports OSM Tags
Ian Dees wrote:
Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
I zoomed out and noticed that the national border along the Mediterranean
coast of Sicily and the rest of Italy and also France look really bad.
I suppose because we imported the national borders from Italian ISTAT (a
national statistics institute) -- see: source:
David Paleino wrote:
http://osm.org/go/xZaERTJSm--
Please, don't.
Have you contacted the user in question (in a friendly fashion) to explain
how it could be done better? They probably don't read this list.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
David Paleino wrote:
Sent: 29 September 2009 12:26 AM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Cc: talk...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] How *NOT* to map
David Paleino wrote:
http://osm.org/go/xZaERTJSm--
Ah, I forgot also this one:
http://osm.org/go/xZYvzIcHP--
NOT THE WAY TO DO IT!
There
Eugene Alvin Villar seav80 at gmail.com writes:
[Flickr now refers to OSM ids]
The big problem I see is that our node, way, and relation IDs are too brittle
for this sort of thing.
Agreed. Or at least, you cannot expect them to be around forever. But at
least they aren't reused, so if an id
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:13 AM, David Paleino d.pale...@gmail.com wrote:
Isn't that defined as territorial waters, different from national border?
It would be better to have both drawn -- but the territorial waters marked
as boundary=maritime, or the such?
Some info on tagging here:
2009/9/29 Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com:
A manual redirect tag would never work - about 1% of contributors would bother
to add it, and even then messing with id numbers by hand is error-prone.
Rather, if an object is marked as deleted, return its last position and
perhaps
the changeset id that
2009/9/29 David Paleino d.pale...@gmail.com:
Isn't that defined as territorial waters, different from national border?
It would be better to have both drawn -- but the territorial waters marked
as boundary=maritime, or the such?
That what happens with Australia which doesn't have any land
2009/9/29 Gustav Foseid gust...@gmail.com:
Todo: Clean up to proposal and support in the most common renderers.
Why do you want these to render exactly?
I agree with land based borders but it looks weird/confusing seeing
maritime boundaries.
___
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:48 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/9/29 Gustav Foseid gust...@gmail.com:
Todo: Clean up to proposal and support in the most common renderers.
Why do you want these to render exactly?
They are rendered today, but visually the same as land
2009/9/29 Gustav Foseid gust...@gmail.com:
They are rendered today, but visually the same as land borders. I would
Ummm they are?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-24.622lon=153.677zoom=10
Centre of the map is where the maritime border of Australia runs and I
don't see anything rendered at
Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
David Paleino wrote:
http://osm.org/go/xZaERTJSm--
Ah, I forgot also this one:
http://osm.org/go/xZYvzIcHP--
NOT THE WAY TO DO IT!
There isn't a lot of point shouting at the mailing list about this.
Needed to rant somewhere :)
(and, most
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:00 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/9/29 Gustav Foseid gust...@gmail.com:
They are rendered today, but visually the same as land borders. I would
Ummm they are?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-24.622lon=153.677zoom=10
Centre of the map is
... Are you sure about the spelling of ... fork off American ... - doesn't
sound quite right but perhaps it's just my mid-Atlantic accent?
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: John Smith [mailto:deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 September 2009 02:16
To: Russ Nelson
Cc:
2009/9/29 Gustav Foseid gust...@gmail.com:
They have normally been tagged as land borders, resulting in something like
this:
http://osm.org/go/evC2d--
http://osm.org/go/3Tjpd-
Because they've been tagged boundary=administrative,
boundary_type=maritime, the around Australia it's just
2009/9/29 Gustav Foseid gust...@gmail.com:
They have normally been tagged as land borders, resulting in something like
this:
http://osm.org/go/evC2d--
http://osm.org/go/3Tjpd-
what do you mean by land border? They are national borders,
(administrative, level 2). There is this (approved but
Greetings.
It apparently stopped working because Polish translation[1] contains double
quotes which make their way to html unescaped which produces a JS string like
this:
Blah blah foo bar blah
in which foo bar becomes JS *code*. The quotes in the message should be
escaped *and* the code
2009/9/29 Gregory Williams gregory.willi...@purplegeodesoftware.co.uk
Ian Dees wrote:
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flickr_now_supports_openstreetmap_
tags.php
Good to see someone else talking about OSM...
Excellent news
Indeed this is fantastic news. Having that
2009/9/29 Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dk:
I zoomed out and noticed that the national border along the Mediterranean
coast of Sicily and the rest of Italy and also France look really bad. Is
there a reason why the border isn't off the coast like it is most places,
e.g. Spain?
we're
2009/9/29 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
Does anyone have a script to calculate the 12nm-offset and probably
simplify the outcome?
The Australia 12nm boundary was guessed by someone and roughly put in...
___
talk mailing list
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:58 AM, stl...@poczta.fm wrote:
Greetings.
It apparently stopped working because Polish translation[1] contains double
quotes which make their way to html unescaped which produces a JS string like
this:
Blah blah foo bar blah
in which foo bar becomes JS *code*.
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/9/29 Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dk:
I zoomed out and noticed that the national border along the Mediterranean
coast of Sicily and the rest of Italy and also France look really bad. Is
there a reason why the border isn't off the coast like it is most
2009/9/29 David Paleino d.pale...@gmail.com
Looking at the Spain maritime border, there's a
source=robot-generated-12nm-
border, so it probably exists :)
Anyone knows where to get it from?
Performing an ST_Buffer might help in Postgis.
Emilie Laffray
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:11:21AM +0100, Frankie Roberto wrote:
I'd love it if other people started adding the tags too, if only to
prove that I'm not the only one who likes this idea (and who likes
taking photos of random buildings).
I've started tagging too. Not much yet, but that'll
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Frankie Roberto
fran...@frankieroberto.com wrote:
2009/9/29 Gregory Williams gregory.willi...@purplegeodesoftware.co.uk
I also think this Flickr-linking might be a good prompt for us to re-look at
the /browse/* pages. If these pages are going to be more visible,
2009/9/29 Federico Cozzi f.co...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:27 AM, David Paleino d.pale...@gmail.com wrote:
Looking at the Spain maritime border, there's a source=robot-generated-12nm-
border, so it probably exists :)
Just remember that the border should not be computed from the
Am 28.09.2009 20:40, Pieren:
Hi all,
This is not my proposal but this tag is used by the Corine Land Cover
current import in France corresponding to the class 2.2.2 of this
european program (Agricultural areas - Permanent crops - Fruit trees
and berry plantations).
I would like to push
Hi Emilie,
Apologies for not replying in French - although I have an interest in
what you're doing, I don't have the language skills to speak to you
about it natively.
I'm very pleased to see that the Corine data import is going forward
and am looking forward to seeing the results when it's
Anyone (*blinking at Frankie*) knows how long it will takes after adding
the osm machine tag untile the View in OpenStreetMap (btw. I think
that link should be written without spaces) link appears straight below
the picture? And how long about the feature information being extracted
from OSM?
2009/9/29 Claudius claudiu...@gmx.de:
Am 28.09.2009 20:40, Pieren:
Hi all,
This is not my proposal but this tag is used by the Corine Land Cover
current import in France corresponding to the class 2.2.2 of this
european program (Agricultural areas - Permanent crops - Fruit trees
and berry
2009/9/29 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.com
I'm not sure what the state of the User Experience Working Group is, but
I'd
be happy to join and help with this, if people think it's a good idea.
(Personally, I think the scope for OSM to be a provider of linked-data
POIs
is huge,
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 1:38 AM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
I'm repeatedly told don't tag for the renderers
OK, let me even it out a bit and give you some guidance:
Tagging for the renderer is OK
Tagging for the renderer is OK
Tagging for the renderer is OK
Tagging for the renderer
On 29 Sep 2009, at 11:21, Claudius wrote:
Anyone (*blinking at Frankie*) knows how long it will takes after
adding
the osm machine tag untile the View in OpenStreetMap (btw. I think
that link should be written without spaces) link appears straight
below
the picture? And how long about the
2009/9/29 Claudius claudiu...@gmx.de
Anyone (*blinking at Frankie*) knows how long it will takes after adding
the osm machine tag untile the View in OpenStreetMap (btw. I think
that link should be written without spaces) link appears straight below
the picture? And how long about the feature
2009/9/29 Peter Childs pchi...@bcs.org:
While some farmers may rotate their land, partially with Orchards this
is not as likely as with grassland and ploughed Fields
+1
I'd also like to see differentiation of conventional orchards and
meadow orchards (de:Streuobstwiese). See Wikipedia:en for
2009/9/29 Federico Cozzi f.co...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Just remember that the border should not be computed from the
coastline, but from the baseline (which is further into the sea and
much simpler)
probably the outcome
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/9/29 Peter Childs pchi...@bcs.org:
I'd also like to see differentiation of conventional orchards and
meadow orchards (de:Streuobstwiese). See Wikipedia:en for details in
English.
Please add your comments
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Claudius claudiu...@gmx.de wrote:
I'd rather like to see this merged into some more generic
landuse=agricultural
tagging-scheme. Which would cover general farmland (currently tagged
as landuse=farmland) as well. Any farmer within the OSM crowd that could
Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
I wish OSM has a redirect feature for deleted nodes, ways, and
relations sort of like what Wikipedia has for its articles and pages.
Maybe a redirect=* tag? :-)
You mean something like this?:
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2194
--
Jonathan (Jonobennett)
... Not a farmer but a country boy ... my ha'porth ...
Orchards (including olive groves etc.) seem sufficiently distinct (and
permanent - not rotated) to justify a tag of their own. Same might apply
e.g. to vineyards.
Some plantations e.g. bananas, oil palm also seem semi-permanent given the
On 29/09/09 11:24, Frankie Roberto wrote:
A more direct way to do it *now* is to suggest specific improvements
by filing bugs on http://trac.openstreetmap.org under the website
component.
Okay, will do. I'm always a bit shy about submitting improvement ideas
as bugs (as it feels
2009/9/29 Mike Harris mik...@googlemail.com:
Landuse=agricultural vs. Landuse=grassland
And for the former:
Agriculture=arable / pastoral / orchard / plantation
This seems saner, that way if you aren't sure of the land use due to
time of year the aerial imagery was take or what not you can
2009/9/29 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu
Linking the tags to the wiki is going to be a great way of joining the
two things together much more closely. The other thing I'd like to see
is being able to browse sideways from the 'browse' pages, so that it's
possible to navigate from, say, a pub,
Hi,
This is related to a question in the Flickr thread about whether OSM should
provide services as well as data, and is something I've been meaning to ask
for a while:
Are there any terms of use for either the XML API or the Mapnik/Osmarender
map tiles?
eg if someone wants to embed the our
2009/9/29 Federico Cozzi f.co...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for giving this note. Can't we just import/redraw this map, as
it is part of a law? Or isn't it? On the page it looks like it was (I
presume that laws in
On 29/09/09 12:32, Frankie Roberto wrote:
This is related to a question in the Flickr thread about whether OSM
should provide services as well as data, and is something I've been
meaning to ask for a while:
Are there any terms of use for either the XML API or the
Mapnik/Osmarender map
Lawds, I wish the English could speak English. Who decided it would
be a good idea to fork off American into a whole 'nother language?
Well if it's any consolation I seem to have learnt the American meaning of
public domain before any English meaning ;-)
Nick
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
do you know which kind of grid the coordinates are in?
My guess would be ED50.
- Gustav
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
2009/9/29 Claudius Henrichs claudiu...@gmx.de
No, I rather meant
landuse=agricultural
+
agricultural=orchard/field/crop/salt
and thus keeping the information but in the same time grouping agricultural
landuses under one tag.
That would mean that Mapnik needs to be checking a secondary
Frankie Roberto wrote:
Ha, well there's a contentious statement! If that were the case, then
why do we even bother with the Mapnik/Osmarender tiles? Surely they're
the ultimate form of doing clever stuff with the data.
Primarily so mappers can see what they've been doing, as a form of
2009/9/29 Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.com:
That would mean that Mapnik needs to be checking a secondary field to
determine what to display. If the renderer doesn't do that, you will end up
with a map that is poorer in the end. In your case, that would mean
increasing the size of the
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 29/09/09 11:24, Frankie Roberto wrote:
A more direct way to do it *now* is to suggest specific improvements
by filing bugs on http://trac.openstreetmap.org under the website
component.
Okay, will do. I'm always
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/9/29 Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dk:
I zoomed out and noticed that the national border along the Mediterranean
coast of Sicily and the rest of Italy and also France look really bad. Is
there a reason why the border isn't off the coast like it is most
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
Lawds, I wish the English could speak English. Who decided it would
be a good idea to fork off American into a whole 'nother language?
That would be Noah Webster.
___
talk
On 29/09/09 13:26, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
Generally bug trackers reduce work. They consolidate bugs/feature
requests in one place, people can easily search for already filed bugs
or see that they're filed already and not bother you again.
I absolutely agree as far as bugs are
On 28/09/2009, at 11:16 PM, Gustav Foseid wrote:
Well... There is no copyright that expires after 15 years. Sui
generis database rights expire after 15 years, but copyright is
hardly very relevant for an OpenStreetMap database dump.
In Europe maybe - however there are countries where
2009/9/29 Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dk:
I don't but it should be relatively easy to compute using the following
algorith:
- At each node on the coastline, produce a circle of 12 nmi.
OK, we'll use the baseline instead of the coastline, but besides this
(and because the baseline
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 29/09/09 12:32, Frankie Roberto wrote:
This is related to a question in the Flickr thread about whether OSM
should provide services as well as data, and is something I've been
meaning to ask for a while:
Are there any
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 01:21 +0200, David Paleino wrote:
http://osm.org/go/xZaERTJSm--
Please, don't.
A paragraph or two describing the problem (and the correct way to tag)
could help any newbies searching the archives.
I've seen this sort of thing when someone (apparently) promotes or
2009/9/29 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/9/29 Peter Childs pchi...@bcs.org:
I'd also like to see differentiation of conventional orchards and
meadow orchards (de:Streuobstwiese). See Wikipedia:en for details
Hi,
Frankie Roberto wrote:
Are there any terms of use for either the XML API or the
Mapnik/Osmarender map tiles?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tile_usage_policy
Nothing official, just a draft.
eg if someone wants to embed the our Mapnik tiles on their website (eg
using OpenLayers),
Ian Dees wrote:
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flickr_now_supports_openstreetmap_tags.php
Good to see someone else talking about OSM...
___
talk mailing list
Emilie Laffray wrote:
That would mean that Mapnik needs to be checking a secondary field to
determine what to display. If the renderer doesn't do that, you will end
up with a map that is poorer in the end. In your case, that would mean
That's not really so different as highway + access, or
Problem is that you create expectations that are difficult to fulfil by
hobbyists with the haphazard setup that we have. If you want a reliable
tile server, you need a proper computing centre with fallback hardware
and all that, and admins paid for being woken up at 3am if something
goes
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:48:34 +0100, Nick Whitelegg
nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk wrote:
Problem is that you create expectations that are difficult to fulfil by
hobbyists with the haphazard setup that we have. If you want a reliable
tile server, you need a proper computing centre with fallback
2009/9/29 Kyle Gordon k...@lodge.glasgownet.com:
It works for building=yes, but not building=true. Well, Flickr says
This is a feature in OpenStreetMap instead of $name is a building in
OpenStreetMap.
Did I miss a vital clue where yes and true are not interchangable? I
thought yes was just a
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
It seems rather contra to the spirit of free software and open source it
has to be said.
Not at all. You're free to do whatever you want with the data, and most
of the software used to create, store, process and display it.
What you can't do is expect someone else to
The other hurdle is learning how to render. If this one was a bit easier,
more people would do their own. That will come - but it's slow going
(especially for non-geeks).
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
2009/9/29 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
It works for building=yes, but not building=true. Well, Flickr says
This is a feature in OpenStreetMap instead of $name is a building in
OpenStreetMap.
Did I miss a vital clue where yes and true are not interchangable? I
thought yes
TomH provided me with statistics on created_by=* in all changeset
tags[1][2][3]. Here are with more than 1000 total changesets ordered
by the number of changesets:
813222 = JOSM,
730972 = Potlatch,
96066 = Merkaartor,
40213 = bulk_upload.py,
34625 = upload.py,
17443 = KMLManager,
Hi,
I suppose I'm the culprit for the todo=continue and todo=junction
tags, since I've used them internally for some time and then added them
to GroundTruth hiking rules once I developed GroundTruth.
These tags are not primarily rendering-oriented, they are just pointers
(for me and anyone
2009/9/29 mdeen md...@xs4all.nl
As GNU puts it quite rightly: 'you should think of free as in free
speech, not as in free beer'.
OSM does not hand out free beers (unlimited access to rendered tiles) but
gives free speech (you can use and modify the data freely).
But I agree it should be
Hi Igor,
the tags are great! If all renderers would show them (and in combination
with the noexit-tag), we could improve quality and confidence in OSM.
After my summer holiday in corfu with different paper maps, which proved to
be very inaccurate (missing villages, missing junctions and roads,
Heh, I lost myself on Corfu once, too... Way back in '97, using a paper
map. Those were the good old student days...
Igor
k...@vielevisels wrote:
Hi Igor,
the tags are great! If all renderers would show them (and in
combination with the noexit-tag), we could improve quality and
confidence
On 29/09/2009, at 11.30, John Smith wrote:
2009/9/29 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
Does anyone have a script to calculate the 12nm-offset and probably
simplify the outcome?
The Australia 12nm boundary was guessed by someone and roughly put
in...
Personally, I think that's a
I've been noticing recently a problem we're going to/already have in
our data when it comes to routing directions particularly. It concerns
how to define continuations of roads at junctions and/or the road
markings that delineate that. This problem manifests itself in many
ways but for a first
Hi,
Matt Williams wrote:
On the left you will see the physical plan of a road junction near
where I live. The way that it would be represented in the OSM data
model is shown on the right.
[...]
Your problem can and should be solved by a relation that models: to
travel from node X to node Y
Here is a proposal for tagging natural=peak with its prominence (prime
factor) in meters:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/key:prominence
Please comment, preferably on the talk-page.
Best Regards
Egil Hjelmeland
___
talk
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Mike N. nice...@att.net wrote:
Since I haven't heard any counter points of view, how do we proceed with
this? Based on previous comments, it should not just be Edit the wiki
page, or is this change small enough to just update the wiki?
If you're referring
Peter Childs wrote:
2009/9/28 Mark Williams mark@blueyonder.co.uk:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
courtland.yoc...@mindspring.com wrote:
I've been thinking a bit about this from a very different perspective -
that of parks and other open public areas where you
Hi,
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
The same goes with the ODbL. Once you make a planet dump and let 15 years
pass, you can not assert any rights over the dump... so you can not assert
the ODbL. Simple as that.
Question is: 1. what about the contents themselves. Have we reached a
consensus that
Frankie Roberto wrote:
2009/9/29 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com
It works for building=yes, but not building=true. Well, Flickr says
This is a feature in OpenStreetMap instead of $name is a
building in
OpenStreetMap.
could /not /be completely banned.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Hi,
Roy Wallace wrote:
In that case, use a relation. Two options:
1) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Segmented_Tag
[...]
2) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Collected_Ways
Both don't go far enough in my opinion. This is not a question of how
can I
Hi!
We have a problem in Irkutsk, Russia.
From August 2008 to February 2009, Evgeny
Mandrikovhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Evgeny%20Mandrikov/editshas
made the import of a whole city, but made it very casually: duplicate
streets, unclosed contours of buildings, addresses as names of
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Roy Wallace wrote:
In that case, use a relation. Two options:
1) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Segmented_Tag
2) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Collected_Ways
Both don't go
1 - 100 of 316 matches
Mail list logo
