Hi guys,
I really don't think we could push through with the Corregidor Mapping
Party. Planning was mostly nonexistent and I don't think many people are
willing to spend a large amount of money for the ferry trip and the possible
overnight stay in the hotel on Corregidor. Let's postpone that
Hi,
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
I've created a proposed version of the human readable contributor
terms on the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Database_License/Contributor_Terms/Human_readable
The wording can doubtless be improved (please do so!), and maybe
there's
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
ava...@gmail.comwrote:
I've created a proposed version of the human readable contributor
terms on the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Database_License/Contributor_Terms/Human_readable
Interesting. I just noticed the
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 21:36, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 14/05/10 21:19, Ęvar Arnfjörš Bjarmason wrote:
I've created a proposed version of the human readable contributor
terms on the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Database_License/Contributor_Terms/Human_readable
Hi thanks,
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Graham Jones
grahamjones...@googlemail.com wrote:
Sam,
It is probably worth a look at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_on_Paper if you haven't seen it.
http://www.ancalime.de/gutau.html
Seems to be a little closer, but it would just need
Hi Sam,
Sorry, I think I missed the point of your question - I thought you wanted
something automatic to save having to move things manually.
When I have just wanted a quick map with a few additions I have just used
osmarender and inkscape (I actually use the perl version of osmrender
because it
El 14/05/2010 5:30, Arlindo Pereira escribió:
[...] using Iván's ogr2osm.py [1] and it worked out pretty well.
Oi!
I'm glad my software is useful. Remember that ogr2osm is beerware,
though :-)
However, the tracks are misaligned with the tracks I already have
collected with GPS
Yeah, it
Matt Amos wrote:
as a preface, some thoughts i had a while ago on the OSM logo
http://www.asklater.com/matt/wordpress/2006/05/infamy/
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Robert Martinez m...@mray.de wrote:
having a real map as part of the logo offers some nice opportunities indeed!
But
John Smith wrote:
don't mind the current logo, it incorporates the fact that there is
bits behind the rendering...
Isn't that kind of lame in the digital age we live in? :P
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Robert,
In my opinion a logo has to reduce the amount of representation to the
absolute essence in order to work right.
[...]
I chose to stick to the basic aspect of marking things on a map
Marking things on a map is the absolute essence of trivial POI
collection projects. There are
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Robert,
In my opinion a logo has to reduce the amount of representation to
the absolute essence in order to work right.
[...]
I chose to stick to the basic aspect of marking things on a map
Marking things on a map is the absolute essence of trivial POI
collection
On Fri, 14 May 2010, Steve Bennett wrote:
Can someone offer some tips on how to distinguish a quarry from a
construction site? They seem to look pretty similar from the air -
lots of dirt and vehicle tracks, sometimes piles of dirt.
Eg:
Iván Sánchez Ortega ivan at sanchezortega.es writes:
That magical conversion is called a Proj.4 string. Instead of letting
ogr2osm guess the projection, you can specify all of its parameters,
including a manual shift on the x, y and z axis.
Try with +proj=utm +zone=23 +south
El 14/05/2010 12:06, Jukka Rahkonen escribió:
Try with +proj=utm +zone=23 +south +ellps=GRS67+towgs84=-66.87,4.37,-38.52
Somebody in the internet has used it before
http://www.mundogeo.com.br/forum_mensagem.php?topico=1105
And the way to use it in ogr2osm should be something like:
python
Hi,
Robert Martinez wrote:
Unluckily I don't see how putting a magnifier on 1s and 0s on a map
shows any kind of making anything either.
Yes but the existing logo is cryptic enough not to make people think
yeah, flagging POIs on a map, lots of people do that.
Plus, the old logo didn't claim
On Fri, 14 May 2010, Robert Martinez wrote:
John Smith wrote:
don't mind the current logo, it incorporates the fact that there is
bits behind the rendering...
Isn't that kind of lame in the digital age we live in? :P
looks better than those flag things on the golf course, which is what
Hello,
I came to the OSM project to help create a better map of the world, not
to be insulted. Please remove the page
http://matt.dev.openstreetmap.org/dupe_nodes/heroes.html immediately.
Thanks in advance,
N.
___
talk mailing list
I would be interested to do so!
Looks like I'll be near Barcelona at that time but the deadline for
submitting talks is over.
Maybe there are still free slots for a lighting Talk
SteveC wrote:
On May 13, 2010, at 1:50 PM, Robert Martinez wrote:
What exactly would you expect to be the
I came to the OSM project to help create a better map of the world, not
to be insulted. Please remove the page
http://matt.dev.openstreetmap.org/dupe_nodes/heroes.html immediately.
Not only that, but more than one 'hero' belongs in the 'villain' category
for blind and ill-considered
El 14/05/2010 14:25, Mike N. escribió:
I came to the OSM project to help create a better map of the world, not
to be insulted. Please remove the page
http://matt.dev.openstreetmap.org/dupe_nodes/heroes.html immediately.
Not only that, but more than one 'hero' belongs in the 'villain'
Nakor,
Nakor wrote:
I came to the OSM project to help create a better map of the world, not
to be insulted. Please remove the page
http://matt.dev.openstreetmap.org/dupe_nodes/heroes.html immediately.
The page is helpful and should not be removed.
To be less offensive, one could replace the
On 14 May 2010 14:25, Mike N. nice...@att.net wrote:
Not only that, but more than one 'hero' belongs in the 'villain' category
for blind and ill-considered duplicate elimination, causing a hopeless
tangle of map elements which makes proper editing difficult to impossible.
At least there are
Of course, a large water-filled hole, without vehicles around it, describes
both an inactive quarry and an inactive large-scale building site. Given the
current state of the world's economy, there are a certain number of the latter
around, because the developer went broke.
--Original
On 5/14/2010 8:31 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
The following users have created the most duplicate nodes since the
count was started. If you are on this list, something is seriously
wrong with either your software or your workflow, and you should talk
to other mappers to help you fix it.
I
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Nakor wrote:
I came to the OSM project to help create a better map of the world, not
to be insulted. Please remove the page
http://matt.dev.openstreetmap.org/dupe_nodes/heroes.html immediately.
The page is helpful and should not be removed.
To be less offensive,
It seems I'm a villain too although it's news to me.
Thinking about it, it must be from copying and pasting some OS VectorMap
polygons between .osm layers in JOSM over the last couple of weeks. JOSM
seems to create the nodes for the polygon and then create them again with
the way if that makes
On Friday 14 May 2010 15:03:25 Nakor wrote:
I take you to the word. Can you please help me finding out what in the
software I use (JOSM) and/or my workflow is seriously wrong?
Not running the Validator plugin frequently enough. It detects, warns, and
helps fix duplicated nodes.
--
On 14 May 2010 05:32, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Can someone offer some tips on how to distinguish a quarry from a
construction site? They seem to look pretty similar from the air -
lots of dirt and vehicle tracks, sometimes piles of dirt.
Eg:
Am 14.05.2010 16:02, Kevin Peat:
It seems I'm a villain too although it's news to me.
Thinking about it, it must be from copying and pasting some OS VectorMap
polygons between .osm layers in JOSM over the last couple of weeks. JOSM
seems to create the nodes for the polygon and then create
Occasionally the subject of Flash and free software comes up here in
relation to Potlatch.
I would encourage people to sign the petition at http://openplayer.net/
encouraging Adobe to make the Flash Player open source.
cheers
Richard
___
talk
Did you download all existing data in that area and run the validator
before uploading your data? This should have told you with a red No
entry sign in it's report that you were about to upload duplicate nodes.
Claudius
Most of the time I use the feature to download around my GPS
+1
On 14 May 2010 18:10, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Occasionally the subject of Flash and free software comes up here in
relation to Potlatch.
I would encourage people to sign the petition at http://openplayer.net/
encouraging Adobe to make the Flash Player open source.
2010/5/14 Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es:
Any ideas? I don't think that the government data is misaligned like
that.
You're wrong: it is. It all comes down to which reference system you
use. Unfortunately, you'll need two years of geodetics classes in a
university to have a full
Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es writes:
On Friday 14 May 2010 15:03:25 Nakor wrote:
I take you to the word. Can you please help me finding out what in the
software I use (JOSM) and/or my workflow is seriously wrong?
Not running the Validator plugin frequently enough. It detects,
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com writes:
It's not so simple. This changeset:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4300452 made me a
villain when I selectively undid a so-called hero's indiscriminate
joining of highways to boundaries, power lines, and pipelines:
El día Friday 14 May 2010 19:14:35, John Smith dijo:
Since the advent of satellites spinning round the globe, and more
specifically the GPS cluster of satellites, they now use the centre of
the mass of the earth.
Problem is, the center of mass moves along with the continental drift. Have
you
Yes but a problem with Flash is it is a major security hole. It's probably
the major source of Malware in Windows at the moment so we should probably
promote other alternative methods.
Cheerio John
On 14 May 2010 13:08, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Occasionally the subject of
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 17:08, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Occasionally the subject of Flash and free software comes up here in
relation to Potlatch.
I would encourage people to sign the petition at http://openplayer.net/
encouraging Adobe to make the Flash Player open
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
ava...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 17:08, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
wrote:
Occasionally the subject of Flash and free software comes up here in
relation to Potlatch.
I would encourage people to sign the
I've created a proposed version of the human readable contributor
terms on the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Database_License/Contributor_Terms/Human_readable
The wording can doubtless be improved (please do so!), and maybe
there's something more to cover. Let's try to keep
awesome
On May 14, 2010, at 2:19 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
I've created a proposed version of the human readable contributor
terms on the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Database_License/Contributor_Terms/Human_readable
The wording can doubtless be improved
Hi,
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
I've created a proposed version of the human readable contributor
terms on the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Database_License/Contributor_Terms/Human_readable
The wording can doubtless be improved (please do so!), and maybe
there's
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 20:44, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
The wording can doubtless be improved (please do so!), and maybe
there's something more to cover. Let's try to keep it short though.
I think the wording is ok, but I would advise against
On 14/05/10 21:19, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
I've created a proposed version of the human readable contributor
terms on the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Database_License/Contributor_Terms/Human_readable
The wording can doubtless be improved (please do so!), and
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 21:36, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 14/05/10 21:19, Ęvar Arnfjörš Bjarmason wrote:
I've created a proposed version of the human readable contributor
terms on the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Database_License/Contributor_Terms/Human_readable
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 20:19, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.com wrote:
If the legal cabal doesn't disapprove of this (and hopefully,
approves) I can submit patches against the website to include this in
the relevant signup form.
I've now changed[1] the signup form in my branch:
On 14/05/10 22:53, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
The attribution part is there because of section #4 of the contributor
terms:
4. At Your or the copyright holder’s option, OSMF agrees to
attribute You or the copyright holder. A mechanism will be
provided, currently a web
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 21:57, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
The point is not that we don't need to explain how attribution is handled
but rather that we don't need to mention that it's a change because a new
user has no knowledge of previous arrangements.
In other words the first
john whelan wrote:
Yes but a problem with Flash is it is a major security hole.
My considered opinion on that theory is bollocks.
It's a frickin' browser plugin, if the browser is letting it access your
l337 credit card details then the browser probably ought to address its
plugin
www.zdnet.com/blog/bott/how-secure-is-flash-heres-what-adobe-wont-tell-you/2152
There are other web sites such as Symantec's site. Symantec's advice
corporate advice:
In order to reduce the threat of successful exploitation of Web browsers,
administrators should maintain a restrictive policy
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 22:51, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Aevar Arnfjorth Bjarmason wrote:
Making their player open source would be nice. But what's mainly
stopping players like Gnash is that their protocols are closed
The SWF and RTMP formats are published. The codecs
And if you really going to do this complicated, than add that the
earth really is a liquid ball with hard shell pieces, some seismic
events can make the earth wobble which might result in these drifts to
accelerate or delay a few years each, sometimes in different
directions, making these
On 15 May 2010 08:51, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
It's a frickin' browser plugin, if the browser is letting it access your
l337 credit card details then the browser probably ought to address its
plugin architecture. Badly written Flash may crash my browser but it has
not yet
On Sat, 15 May 2010, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
It's probably the major source of Malware in Windows
Yeah. The major source of drowning in the Atlantic Ocean is water. BAN
water!!11!11o...@wtflolccbysa
don't forget
oxygen is not only poisonous in some forms but promotes explosions
so ban
Kunnen we weer terug naar de kaart ?
Die licentie troubles gaan helemaal nergens over.
Of we nu ODBL of CCBYSA zijn is volstrekt irrelevant
zolang we geen rechtspersoon van betekenis (in euros) hebben.
Is alleen maar nuttig voor mensen die liever lullen dan mappen.
Oh ja Stefan, kan jij de PD
ik heb ooit wel eens een enquete of poll ingevuld waar werd gevraagd waar
je vond dat het heen moest.
PD was toen ook een optie maar daar heb ik in ieder geval niet voor gekozen.
groet,
floris
Stefan de Konink wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Op 14-05-10 03:09,
Het is wel degelijk relevant!
Ik vind het namelijk een stuk fijner dat ik de baas blijf over mijn edits dan
dat ik dat allemaal overgeef aan de OSM foundation.
Daar zeg ik ook dat ik geen zin het om de legal list te volgen maar zo nu en
dan even op de hoogte gehouden worden wat en hoe er met
Had je dan wel voor ODbL gekozen?
Groet,
--Roeland
On Friday 14 May 2010 09:41:02 Floris Looijesteijn wrote:
ik heb ooit wel eens een enquete of poll ingevuld waar werd gevraagd waar
je vond dat het heen moest.
PD was toen ook een optie maar daar heb ik in ieder geval niet voor
gekozen.
Dat is dan beter dan wat ik de laatste keer had begrepen.
Wel slechter voor de kwaliteit van de kaart dan natuurlijk.
Groet,
--Roeland
On Friday 14 May 2010 03:09:03 Cartinus wrote:
On Friday 14 May 2010 00:09:35 Roeland Douma wrote:
Voor zover ik heb begrepen wordt het opt-out
dus als ik
ja, the lesser of two evils zeg maar :)
ik wil niet pd omdat ik toch wel op z'n minst iets van credit voor m'n
werk wil krijgen
maar het zal me eigenlijk een worst wezen, ik wil gewoon kaartjes maken!
gr,
floris
Roeland Douma wrote:
Had je dan wel voor ODbL gekozen?
Groet,
--Roeland
On
Klinkt als een schitterende motivatie zeg :P
Aan de ene kant bent ik voor credits maar aan de andere kant baal ik er nog
veel meer van dat vanuit osm geen data richting 6pp kan, omdat de licentie van
6pp nog vrijer is (CC-0).
Ik vind toch het argument ik wil gewoon kaartjes maken niet zo heel
Roeland Douma wrote:
...
(hoe vrij is dus een punt van discussie). Als een niet nader te noemen
grote
internet gigant opeens zegt van je mag bij ons best edits maken en je
krijgt
credit voor je werk maar de data wordt van ons. Denk niet dat er veel
actieve
OSM leden daar aan bij zouden
Als we zo graag willen dat iedereen onze kaart kan gebruiken dan lijkt PD me
toch de beste oplossing.
Probleem met het hele ODbL vraagstuk is dat je direct dagen bezig bent om
alles erover te lezen alle discussie door te ploegen etc. Terwijl ik vaak
simpele berichtgeving overzichten van wat we
On Thursday 13 May 2010 23:27:18 Henk Hoff wrote:
We moeten nu het stadium van mijmeren over scenario's achter ons laten.
Tijd om te zien wat de daadwerkelijke cijfers zullen zijn. Dan kunnen we
over die echte cijfers gaan praten.
Precies, we moeten weten waar we aan toe zijn.
Dat kun je doen
Roeland,
Ste: Ik heb zojuist alle edits van jouw naam gekopieerd en ga ze publiceren
onder PD licentie: wat ga je nu doen behalve niet fijn vinden ??
Gert Gremmen
-
Openstreetmap.nl (alias: cetest)
Before printing, think about the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Op 14-05-10 14:10, Cartinus schreef:
Of je kunt _nu_ aan de top twintig editors in Nederland te vragen hoe ze
erover denken en uit proberen te zoeken hoeveel impact dat heeft.
Dat is dus de issue ;) Die top twintig hoeft niet de historische
Het gaat er toch niet om wat ik ga doen? Het gaat erom wat ik kan doen.
Veel fanatieke OSM-ers roepen juist dat onze kaart vrij is (discutabel punt
maar dat is voor een andere keer). Echter je moet je aan de licentie houden.
Er zijn al genoeg recht zaken omtrent GPL geweest en nog vele meer
het is vast niet zo heel moeilijk om een kaartje te maken met alle ways
die nog versie 1 zijn... dat geeft misschien al een aardig beeld...
Stefan de Konink wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Op 14-05-10 14:10, Cartinus schreef:
Of je kunt _nu_ aan de top twintig editors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Op 14-05-10 15:03, Floris Looijesteijn schreef:
het is vast niet zo heel moeilijk om een kaartje te maken met alle ways
die nog versie 1 zijn... dat geeft misschien al een aardig beeld...
Versie 1 in de full dump is niet de 'eerste' versie 1.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Op 14-05-10 15:47, Floris Looijesteijn schreef:
Huh? Weet je dat zeker? Meer info ergens?
De hele history is op een zeker moment geditched. Ik weet niet meer of
dat was van 0.5 = 0.6 of van in een van de vorige versies.
Maakt niet uit natuurlijk,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Op 14-05-10 17:02, Henk Hoff schreef:
Einde vorig jaar is er een stemmingsronde geweest onder de leden van
de OSM Foundation over dit proces. Deze hebben met overgrote
meerderheid voor continuatie van het proces gestemd.
De leden (270)
Op 14 mei 2010 17:27 schreef Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de het
volgende:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Op 14-05-10 17:02, Henk Hoff schreef:
Einde vorig jaar is er een stemmingsronde geweest onder de leden van
de OSM Foundation over dit proces. Deze hebben met
On Friday 14 May 2010 17:17:25 Stefan de Konink wrote:
De hele history is op een zeker moment geditched. Ik weet niet meer of
dat was van 0.5 = 0.6 of van in een van de vorige versies.
Dat was tussen 0.4 en 0.5.
--
m.v.g.,
Cartinus
___
Talk-nl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hey Henk,
Op 14-05-10 18:53, Henk Hoff schreef:
Dat mag je vinden. Echter, dit is een heel gebruikelijke gang van zaken
bij verenigingen.
We zijn geen vereniging. Sterker nog de meeste mensen zijn betrokken
geraakt bij OSM toen het nog gewoon
On Friday 14 May 2010 18:54:55 Cartinus wrote:
On Friday 14 May 2010 17:17:25 Stefan de Konink wrote:
De hele history is op een zeker moment geditched. Ik weet niet meer of
dat was van 0.5 = 0.6 of van in een van de vorige versies.
Dat was tussen 0.4 en 0.5.
Overigens is de ontwikkelaar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Op 14-05-10 19:20, Cartinus schreef:
Dat laatste is voor Nederland overigens grotendeels irrelevant want de AND
import was vlak voor de 0.4 - 0.5 overgang en ik hoop dat iedereen (die er
toen bij was) zich nog kan herinneren hoe weinig er is
Maw wachten totdat iedereen gestemd heeft en zien wat er van de OSM DB
overblijft
En wat was ook alweer de reden om *echt* principieel tegen ODbL te zijn?
Ik ben het met Henk eens. Er is maar één manier in iedergeval om dit goed te
regelen en dat is als 1 orgaan bepaald (democratisch)
onder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Op 14-05-10 20:42, F. Heinen schreef:
En wat was ook alweer de reden om _echt_ principieel tegen ODbL te zijn?
Principele reden is het afgeven van rechten aan de OSMF die er dan in
principe alles mee kan doen wat men goed dunkt. Daarbij zijn voor
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/05/14/2899710.htm
--
Advancement in position.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On 14 May 2010 14:14, Balram Ramanathan balram.ramanat...@nearmap.com wrote:
Hi,
I've come across a handful of Ways with ABS data attributions that are
(probably incorrectly) marked as administrative boundaries. They are:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/14191309
Gostaria de estar presente.
Vamo que vamo!
[]s
2010/5/14 Diogo diogownunes2...@yahoo.com.br
On 5/14/2010 8:00 AM, talk-br-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 07:14:57 -0300
From: Claudomiro Nascimento Juniorclaudom...@claudomiro.com
Subject: Re: [Talk-br] Virada
*Status dos Projetos OSM-br*
*
B250C - Brasil 250 Cidades*
Página do Projeto:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Brazil/Brasil_250_Cidades
*2a. fase*
Conectividade em *72,42%* *(+6,15%)*
Grid Atualizado (html): http://mapaslivres.org/cidades-distancias.html (13
Mb)
Grid Atualizado
Olá Pessoal,
Acabei de baixar uma imagem de satélite do CBERS 2B. As imagens são
monocromáticas e com resolução de 2.5 metros. A imagem é um pouco pior que a
do yahoo, mas a vantagem é que cobre todo Brasil.
Eu acho que a gente pode usar estas imagens principalmente para mapear
cidades menores.
2010/5/14 Vitor George vitor.geo...@gmail.com:
Olá Pessoal,
Acabei de baixar uma imagem de satélite do CBERS 2B. As imagens são
monocromáticas e com resolução de 2.5 metros. A imagem é um pouco pior que a
do yahoo, mas a vantagem é que cobre todo Brasil.
Eu acho que a gente pode usar estas
As rodovias menores (de duas pistas) são identificáveis na imagem? Se
for, seria uma ótima para melhorar o traçado das importanções do
IBGE...
2010/5/14 Vitor George vitor.geo...@gmail.com:
Olá Pessoal,
Acabei de baixar uma imagem de satélite do CBERS 2B. As imagens são
monocromáticas e com
2010/5/14 Johan Dahlin jdah...@gmail.com:
2010/5/14 Vitor George vitor.geo...@gmail.com:
Olá Pessoal,
Acabei de baixar uma imagem de satélite do CBERS 2B. As imagens são
monocromáticas e com resolução de 2.5 metros. A imagem é um pouco pior que a
do yahoo, mas a vantagem é que cobre todo
2010/5/14 Arlindo Pereira arli...@clavis.com.br:
Eu acho muito louco essas licenças limitarem cidadãos brasileiros.
Quer dizer que se tivermos uma força tarefa para traçar as cidades com
essas imagens o Aun (por exemplo) não poderá ajudar? Meio esquisito
isso...
Eu acho que o grande problema
Hallo, um es kurz zu machen, würde ich gerne OSM in Sachsen verbessern.
Vielleicht möchte ja jemand mit anpacken?
Hintergründe,Details+Diskussion gibts dazu hier:
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=7495
(kommt ihr mit eurem normalen OSM Login rein)
Bitte lasst uns erstmal im Forum
Johannes Huesing johan...@huesing.name wrote:
So erspart man sich explizit anzugeben ob eine
Straße innerhalb oder außerhalb einer Stadt ist (weil Polygon umlegen
nicht (zuverlaessig) funktioniert).
Aber das ist doch von hinten durch die Brust ins Auge,
Habe ich richtig verstanden,
Nein, das Zugehörigkeitstag sollte nur nicht maxspeed heißen,
sondern geschlossene_ortschaft=yes oder was weiß ich.
Hallo,
ich fände ein unabhängiges Tag auch sinnvoller. Das würde auch gleich den
maxspeed-Krieg mit lösen.
Über solch ein Tag kann man sich ein maxspeed ableiten, wenn keines
Am 14. Mai 2010 14:17 schrieb aighes h.scholl...@googlemail.com:
Hallo,
ich fände ein unabhängiges Tag auch sinnvoller. Das würde auch gleich den
maxspeed-Krieg mit lösen.
ach so? Weil man dann gar nicht mehr weiss, wie die
Höchstgeschwindigkeit ist? Weil man eine Tabelle bräuchte, um
Hallo,
Tirkon schrieb:
Irgendwann kam jemand auf die Idee, dass diese Höchstgeschwindigkeit
durch ein explizites Schild angekündigt werden kann oder durch eine
geschlossene Ortschaft bedingt werden kann. Daher erfand er:
maxspeed=DE:urban
Der Vorteil liegt darin, dass man nichts ändern muss,
Am 14. Mai 2010 14:42 schrieb Rainer Kluge rklug...@web.de:
geschlossene Ortschaft bedingt werden kann. Daher erfand er:
maxspeed=DE:urban
Der Vorteil liegt darin, dass man nichts ändern muss, wenn der Gesetztgeber
mal
auf die Idee kommt die Höchstgeschwindigkeit in geschlossenen
Hallo,
es gibt Leute die lieber die maxspeed aus dem urban, etc. ziehen möchten und
Leute die sie aus dem maxspeed holen wollen. Jeder kann sich frei aussuchen
woher er diese Daten bezieht. Das maxspeed bleibt ja vom innerorts-TAG
unberührt.
Bei den Zahlenwerten ging ich von Deutschland aus,
aighes schrieb:
Der Vorteil gegenüber einem source:maxspeed ist der, dass die
Höchstgeschwindigkeit Innerorts auch durch ein Schild geregelt sein kann.
Dann müsste man source:maxspeed=sign eintragen. Dies trifft aber auf alle
Straßen zu und charakterisiert damit keine innerortige Straße.
Hallo,
die Leipzig School of Media lädt am Dienstag zu einer
Diskussionsveranstaltung über Geotagging im
Mediencampus in Leipzig http://osm.org/go/0MGgzJaxS- ein.
Fabian.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 14:55:11 +0200
From: Leipzig School of Media gGmbH
Am 14. Mai 2010 15:44 schrieb Volker aeon...@gmx.de:
Warum kompliziert, wenn es auch einfach geht?
Wenn einStraßenabschnitt mit einer Geschwindigkeit getaggt ist, kann man
davon ausgehen, dass da ein Schild stehen.
Was soll da noch extra ein tag für ein Verkehrszeichen?
das steht lang und
Karl Eichwalder k...@gnu.franken.de wrote:
Gerne :) -- wegen des nebeldunsts ist die person aber nur schwer zu
erkennen:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/keichwa/3900592310/in/set-72157622081037621/
Diese Personenbeförderung sieht aber eher illegal aus. Allerdings ist
das wohl häufig. Von
Matthias Meißer wrote:
Bitte lasst uns erstmal im Forum diskutieren, da ist die Einstiegshürde
geringer und nicht jeder muss auf Talk-DE sein.
Muss auch so keiner.
Kennst du gmane schon?
Gruß
Manuel
___
Talk-de mailing list
habe mapgen.pl 1.05 veröffentlicht. die neue version kann das.
On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 16:18 +0200, Stephan Wolff wrote:
Moin,
ich suche ein Tool, dass die Elemente einer Relation mit ihrer Rolle auf
dem Hintergrund einer OSM-Karte darstellt. Die Darstellung könnte sehr
ähnlich der des
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
