2010/8/18 Marko Dimjasevic ma...@dimjasevic.net:
2010/8/18 Valent Turkovic valent.turko...@gmail.com:
Meni najbolji feature je to što podržava zabrane skretanja (turn
restrictions) pa vas routing neće navoditi preko duple crte i na slične
loše route tamo gdje se ne smije skrenuti, ako ste
Ako idete na godišnji pogledajte malo kako su označene ulice u mjestima u
kojima boravite.
Vidio sam par grešaka koje stranci prave kada označavaju neke ceste, npr.
uske pješačke ulice koje ćete naći po skoro svim mjestima na jadranu
svakako označavaju (footpath, residential, itd...), dok je
2010/8/19 Valent Turkovic valent.turko...@gmail.com
Ako idete na godišnji pogledajte malo kako su označene ulice u mjestima u
kojima boravite.
Vidio sam par grešaka koje stranci prave kada označavaju neke ceste, npr.
uske pješačke ulice koje ćete naći po skoro svim mjestima na jadranu
I don't think we can trace on those (or at least nobody asked).
They are top notch quality, though.
Would someone from talk-be know something about it?
- Chris -
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 18:18, Rémi Letot hob...@poukram.net wrote:
Hello,
I'm a new contributor to OSM and new user of
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:17:15AM +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Yup. But then again, by the time data has lapsed it is very likely
to be utterly useless. I am 99% certain that in 10 years time you
*will*, for most use cases, be able to get data that is more current
than OSM and has less
Hi,
Emilie Laffray wrote:
While I am not a legal expert, I will try to answer that one.
Companies can already make money from OpenStreetMap: there are plenty of
examples around (Skobbler, Cloudmade, Geofabrik, etc). There is
nothing preventing a company from using the data. However, they
(moving this thread to legal-talk)
Valent:
AFAIK with new Contributor Terms [1] all data entered into OSM can be
taken by some company, closed and they could create a product made
profit on it.
Grant:
No, they have to make the data available. The data is share-alike.
JohnSmitty wrote:
In any case going forward unless something changes with the CTs many
many many more people will be effected by this, does the OSM APIs have
the ability to indicate if the account has agreed to the CTs and then
update editors to prevent certain layers from being shown.
On 20 August 2010 06:05, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Sure, but who employed them and are repeating it, and going along with it?
The same questions have been asked about OSM-F, with more or less the
same answers...
In their original email. I wasn't quite sure of the context, thus I wrote
On 20 August 2010 06:29, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I think we're all at fault here because when NearMap images became availalbe
for tracing, the whole license change process was already in motion and the
This is a symptom of a much larger problem in OSM, I wasted time
asking for
Hi,
Kai Krueger wrote:
That however does still leave the substantial portion of
mappers who have ticked the I declare my edits to be PD option, which
surely makes them no longer compatible with these sources. These mappers
therefore then presumably can not use those sources without being in
On 20 August 2010 06:32, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Sure, but the OSMF's legal remit is very, very different to NearMaps.
At this point in time we could be told anything by OSM-F and it has to
be taken on good faith that it was an actual opinion by a lawyer,
which can't be quoted directly.
On 20 August 2010 06:35, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
388 users have declared their edits to be PD on the Wiki for a long time,
and I don't think any of them have restricted their editing to PD sources
exclusively.
On the other hand I know some mappers that only ever map from their
On Aug 19, 2010, at 2:43 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 20 August 2010 06:40, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Aug 19, 2010, at 2:35 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 20 August 2010 06:32, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Sure, but the OSMF's legal remit is very, very different to NearMaps.
At
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010, SteveC wrote:
Maybe it's fine to publish advice as public opinion in Australia. I don't
know.
If I, as a company director, in Australia, receive legal advice obtained for
that company, I can share it with the entire Board, and then the Board makes
the decision on with whom
On Aug 19, 2010, at 2:51 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 20 August 2010 06:48, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Where did I question it's accuracy?
You said ... Sure, but who employed them and are repeating it, and
going along with it?
That's not me questioning their accuracy. You were saying
On 19 August 2010 22:05, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I don't think they're being unreasonable about the future, we all have points
to make about the process, the CT's etc. It's holding the past data hostage I
don't personally feel is very cool.
That's just another words to say not
On Aug 19, 2010, at 4:20 PM, 80n wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:55 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Aug 19, 2010, at 3:37 PM, 80n wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:40 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Aug 19, 2010, at 2:35 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 20 August 2010
On Aug 19, 2010, at 4:33 PM, SteveC wrote:
On Aug 19, 2010, at 4:20 PM, 80n wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:55 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Aug 19, 2010, at 3:37 PM, 80n wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:40 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Aug 19, 2010, at 2:35
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:23 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
NearMap is the only company I'm aware of attempting to hold a lot of data
hostage in this way.
I sure hope you've tried your best to listen to their points and
explain yours, and come to an absolute impasse, before accusing them
Hi,
to give some perspective to the debate about whether or not existing
NearMap-derived objects will have to be deleted, I have summed up the
number of edits in all changesets that said anything about NearMap in
any tag (comment, source, etc).
I arrived at a sum of 1,057,549, slightly
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
That obviously explains why NearMap is very important to the community in
Australia. But for the project as a whole, one million objects is really not
something we should make a big fuss about.
I think that the people
On 20 August 2010 11:09, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I arrived at a sum of 1,057,549, slightly over 1 million. The total number
of objects in Australia is 10,234,567. That means that roughly 10% of data
in Australia might be affected by NearMap.
How much will be effected that has
Hi,
On 20 August 2010 03:09, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
one million objects is really not
something we should make a big fuss about. [...]
After the Haiti earthquake, 1
million objects were traced by 300 people in two weeks.
So 300 mappers' work is not something we should make
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
My statistics are of course flawed - they do not capture objects
individually tagged source=nearmap rather than on the changeset, and if an
object has been modified more than once in a nearmap changeset, it has
been
Anthony:
Ugh, another point:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Relations_are_not_
Categories
Putting all the elements which have addresses referencing a
street
into a relation seems to me to violate that principle.
No. There is a relation between the houses and the street. You
http://www.directionsmag.com/article.php?article_id=3573
Congratulations to the organisers, speakers and everyone involved.
Mike
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Alan Mintz wrote:
Are coastlines supposed to be on the low-tide position, high-tide
position, or middle of the beach? I've been gluing the low-tide side of
beaches to coastline on the few I've edited, since their position
suggested that was the intent.
The usual convention (Ordnance
On 19.08.2010 01:05, John F. Eldredge wrote:
When you say process a nearby-search for the street name, how broadly is
nearby interpreted?
...it depends ;)
At first: Of course you're right.
Nashville, TN, USA, where I live, has a number of instances of streets that
were split by later
Hi all
As you may have noticed, if you follow the mailing lists, there's been a
certain amount of discussion about using NearMap aerial imagery (which we
call PhotoMaps) as a source for generating OSM data, in the light of the
current Contributor Terms (CTs, as currently shown at
On 19 August 2010 17:27, Malcolm Herring malcolm.herr...@btinternet.com wrote:
The usual convention (Ordnance Survey for example) for land maps is to use
Mean High Water. (Marine charts usually use Mean High Water Springs as
their dry land datum.)
There are exceptions. If a given area is
JohnSmitty wrote:
make the changes and see if the tiles are
refreshed in a reasonable time period.
The way updates and rerenders work can be a bit complex its full detail. A
better explanation can be found at
AFAIK with new Contributor Terms [1] all data entered into OSM can be
taken by some company, closed and they could create a product made profit
on it.
Yes or no? Please just answer this for start.
I have no problem with companies making a profit, just go ahead and do it.
I have a problem
On 19.08.2010 12:07, Valent Turkovic wrote:
AFAIK with new Contributor Terms [1] all data entered into OSM can be
taken by some company, closed and they could create a product made profit
on it.
Yes or no? Please just answer this for start.
I have no problem with companies making a profit,
However, there are a couple of problems with the CTs.
First: paragraph 2 of the CTs requires that an OSM user grants the OSMF a
very wide ranging licence (a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive,
perpetual, irrevocable license to do any act that is restricted by copyright
over anything
On 19 August 2010 11:07, Valent Turkovic valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
AFAIK with new Contributor Terms [1] all data entered into OSM can be
taken by some company, closed and they could create a product made profit
on it.
Yes or no? Please just answer this for start.
No, they have to make
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Am 17.08.2010 15:31, schrieb John Smith:
On 17 August 2010 23:13, Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de wrote:
It's the same question in other cases, too:
- post offices as service of normal shops
vs. selling office stuff as service of post
On 19 August 2010 11:07, Valent Turkovic valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
AFAIK with new Contributor Terms [1] all data entered into OSM can be
taken by some company, closed and they could create a product made profit
on it.
Yes or no? Please just answer this for start.
I have no problem
Am 19.08.2010 12:23, schrieb Chris Browet:
I, as a OSM contributor, am looking to allow free and unrestricted
access to map data to everybody.
Thank you, Ben, to announce this on OSM-talk. I'd like to invite
everybody that wants to discuss on this topic to come over to Legal-talk
at
Let's keep the Talk-List clean from Legal discussions. Anybody is welcome
to join it on Legal-talk.
Sorry, but I've seen those kind of invitations, too.
I'm not subscribed to Legal-talk and have no interest in the obscure legal
details.
General discussion about the new License/CT belongs to
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 13:01, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.comwrote:
You are missing the problem that OSMF needs those rights to be able to
publish the data and ensure that someone cannot come back later and
take a lawsuit against OSM for publishing their contributed data or
demands
On 19 August 2010 12:18, Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com wrote:
It might very well be true.
I still think a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive, perpetual,snip
free.
Basically, the OSMF asks us to trust it because it doesn't trust us, right?
No. The OSMF is protecting itself from being
Felix Hartmann extremecar...@googlemail.com wrote:
It is true, (they just need to seperate it in two databases, which can
be anyhting), I also think the new license because of this clause is
utter rubbish and if it goes through there needs to be a fork. Is
openfreemap.org still available?
On 19.08.2010 12:24, Grant Slater wrote:
On 19 August 2010 11:07, Valent Turkovicvalent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
AFAIK with new Contributor Terms [1] all data entered into OSM can be
taken by some company, closed and they could create a product made profit
on it.
Yes or no? Please just
Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com wrote:
I, as a OSM contributor, am looking to allow free and unrestricted access to
map data to everybody.
Those clauses would mean that, potentially, I wouldn't be mapping for
humanity but for the OSMF.
You don't really map for humanity now, but for yourself.
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com wrote:
Let's keep the Talk-List clean from Legal discussions. Anybody is welcome
to join it on Legal-talk.
Sorry, but I've seen those kind of invitations, too.
I'm not subscribed to Legal-talk and have no interest in the
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010, Grant Slater wrote:
OSMF is just a legal entity to do things. OSM is the project.
There are people behind. I was a part of the OSM project as soon as I
contributed and I am not part of OSMF. Those are thus 2 different things.
You access OSMF paid for resources
It is possible to change the legal status of something without affecting
the community. For example the gold standard was removed making the dollar a
Fiat currency without an economic meltdown.
Might be a bad example ;-) Some argue the disappearance of the gold standard
(and subsequently
On 19/08/2010 9:37 PM, Nic Roets wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com
mailto:c...@semperpax.com wrote:
Let's keep the Talk-List clean from Legal discussions. Anybody
is welcome to join it on Legal-talk.
Sorry, but I've seen those kind of
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 13:29, Pierre-Alain Dorange pdora...@mac.comwrote:
Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com wrote:
I, as a OSM contributor, am looking to allow free and unrestricted access
to
map data to everybody.
Those clauses would mean that, potentially, I wouldn't be mapping for
Hi,
Emilie Laffray wrote:
While I am not a legal expert, I will try to answer that one.
Companies can already make money from OpenStreetMap: there are plenty of
examples around (Skobbler, Cloudmade, Geofabrik, etc). There is
nothing preventing a company from using the data. However, they
On Wednesday 18 August 2010 12:41:55 you wrote:
Hi Bernhard,
thanks for your reply. This message has become longer than I initially
expected, as I added some general thoughts of mine. Please do feel free to
ignore those and concentrate on open questions. :)
Hi Arne,
I'll answer your mail
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Brendan Morley morb@beagle.com.auwrote:
Um, what happened in October 2008?
If you look at the percentage change in US GDP and you compare it to the
1800s and the early 1900s, then you will come to the conclusion that nothing
happened. The economic
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com wrote:
They definitely need to define that, it would help. an OSI endorsed free
and open license, maybe...
OSI don't endorse Open Data Licenses as far as I know. Open Data
Commons do and they even consulted with the OSM
On 19/08/2010 9:58 PM, Chris Browet wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 13:29, Pierre-Alain Dorange pdora...@mac.com
mailto:pdora...@mac.com wrote:
Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com mailto:c...@semperpax.com wrote:
I've seen often that the reply to this argument is that we must
They definitely need to define that, it would help. an OSI endorsed free
and open license, maybe...
- Chris -
Then you'd be trusting OSI rather than OSMF.
As to define what a free and open source licence is? Absolutely.
___
talk mailing list
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 14:15, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Brendan Morley morb@beagle.com.auwrote:
Um, what happened in October 2008?
If you look at the percentage change in US GDP and you compare it to the
1800s and the early 1900s, then you
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
Anthony:
Ugh, another point:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Relations_are_not_
Categories
Putting all the elements which have addresses referencing a
street
into a relation seems to me to violate that
On 08/19/2010 01:17 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Chris Browetc...@semperpax.com wrote:
They definitely need to define that, it would help. an OSI endorsed free
and open license, maybe...
OSI don't endorse Open Data Licenses as far as I know. Open Data
Commons
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 14:17, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com wrote:
They definitely need to define that, it would help. an OSI endorsed free
and open license, maybe...
OSI don't endorse Open Data Licenses as far as
Felix Hartmann extremecar...@googlemail.com wrote:
[...]
Nope, they don't have to. Only if they use it as one database. If they
use it to publish maps, or create a product that afterwards uses two
databases seperately, they don't have to publish their own data under Odbl.
Yes, no licence
Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com wrote:
You don't really map for humanity now, but for yourself. The actual
licence grant YOU rights on the data you put in OSM database, the change
is to give those rights the the OSMF that would represent the OSM
community.
Agreed, but given the
Hi,
this discussion must move to legal-talk.
Bye
Frederik
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Hi,
this discussion must move to legal-talk.
Bye
Frederik
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Then you don't want OSMF to be granted for rights on contributors
contributions but you're perfectly OK if a compagny take OSM data and
use it for a commercial product without sharealike or copyrights...
So it seems you prefer a private compagny stole our works than a
foundation (you can
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
this discussion must move to legal-talk.
If we don't change the contributor terms, then we lose NearMap.
That's not a legal discussion.
___
talk mailing list
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.25812lon=-71.44119zoom=15layers=M
Looks like it could do with someone visiting to add some POIs?
(trying to bring this back on topic)
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:29:55 +0200, Pierre-Alain Dorange wrote:
With the actual licence it's exactly the same. Compagny can use OSM
data and make profit (CCBYSA do not exclude commercial uses).
I have no problem with companies taking OSM data and making a profit, I
do have a problem if they
(moved over from talk)
Pierre-Alain Dorange wrote:
So it seems you prefer a private compagny stole our works than a
foundation (you can below to) represent the community ?
It would be good if we could refrain from using the word stealing, it
now occurs for the second time today.
The word
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 14:17, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com wrote:
They definitely need to define that, it would help. an OSI endorsed
free
Hi,
Valent Turkovic wrote:
I do have a problem if they take our data and close it
I have written something about this on legal-talk.
Bye
Frederik
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Hi,
Anthony wrote:
I've contacted Angela Beesley and Benjamin Mako Hill from
freedomdefined.com
... which is about free cultural works, and so I'm surprised that they
should answer we have not yet evaluated the ODbL rather than free and
open data is out of scope for us.
Bye
Frederik
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Grant Slater
openstreet...@firefishy.comwrote:
On 19 August 2010 12:18, Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com wrote:
It might very well be true.
I still think a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive, perpetual,snip
free.
Basically, the OSMF asks us to
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Anthony wrote:
I've contacted Angela Beesley and Benjamin Mako Hill from
freedomdefined.com
... which is about free cultural works
i.e. works or expressions which can be freely studied, applied,
copied and/or
1) Please go to legal-talk for topics such as that.
2) Please don't refer to something as stealing where it's not a
process of the previous owner unrightfully losing something and not
having access to it any more. That might be misuse or whatever, but it's
not stealing.
Robert Kaiser
On 08/19/2010 02:08 PM, Anthony wrote:
I've contacted Angela Beesley and Benjamin Mako Hill from
freedomdefined.com, and they say they have not yet evaluated the ODbL.
I was, however, referred by them to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ODbL_comments_from_Creative_Commons
and invited to
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
We haven't had any problems before the controversy over licences, and I
expect
that once these troubles are resolved one way or another, there won't be
further
eruptions. So I'd suggest not setting up any elaborate
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote:
Please don't refer to something as stealing where it's not a process of
the previous owner unrightfully losing something and not having access to it
any more.
Unless it's stealing someone's idea, stealing a kiss, stealing
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
(moved over from talk)
Pierre-Alain Dorange wrote:
So it seems you prefer a private compagny stole our works than a
foundation (you can below to) represent the community ?
It would be good if we could refrain from using the word stealing, it
now occurs for the second
Anthony osm at inbox.org writes:
So I prefer to add the street name to the street (as name) and addr:street
to the building/shop etc.
I think for now that's probably the best solution. And just hope
there aren't too many instances of Main Street on the addr vs. Main
St on the way. And
Hi,
On 19 August 2010 12:07, Valent Turkovic valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
AFAIK with new Contributor Terms [1] all data entered into OSM can be
taken by some company, closed and they could create a product made profit
on it.
How did you come to this conclusion?
Cheers
bernhard zwischenbrugger wrote:
Sometimes it's a bit delayed because of a problem with
delayed minute diffs (http://planet.openstreetmap.org/minute-replicate/)
Perhaps the replay could be a bit faster. I think, that as it is now the
delay will never get smaller again.
Norbert
If it's about NearMap, then talk-au seems more appropriate.
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
this discussion must move to legal-talk.
If we don't change the contributor terms, then we
hi
Sometimes it's a bit delayed because of a problem with
delayed minute diffs (http://planet.openstreetmap.org/minute-replicate/)
Perhaps the replay could be a bit faster. I think, that as it is now the
delay will never get smaller again.
Now one hour has 54 minutes at
I got a question about religious tags.
There is amenity=place_of_worship (1) for church, temple, mosque,
synagogue... (adding the religion and denomination if needed)
For convent, monestary and generally religious place but not open to the
public there is no official tag. I just found a
On 20 August 2010 00:59, Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhau...@gmail.com wrote:
If it's about NearMap, then talk-au seems more appropriate.
While that may currently be true, they claim to be planning to image
some European cities on a monthly basis, I've asked for a rough time
line indication.
On 19 August 2010 18:34, Kai Krueger kakrue...@gmail.com wrote:
But what is imo most likely happening is that the rendering server is at
capacity and thus can't deal with rerenders fast enough, so you won't see
the updates as quickly as you would hope. Also, when it reaches capacity, it
It's
On 19-8-2010 20:10, John Smith wrote:
It's not a case of tiles not being regenerated in a few minutes, it a
case of them not updating in a few days even.
If they are dropped from the rendering queue, they are only readded when
you actively look at them again. When the server load at that
It is not only about NearMap, we have tens of goverment sources which
requires attribution.
It *is* talk list issue. It is about future of the project.
Cheers,
Peter.
2010/8/19 Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhau...@gmail.com:
If it's about NearMap, then talk-au seems more appropriate.
On Thu, Aug
2010/8/19 Pierre-Alain Dorange:
For convent, monestary and generally religious place but not open to the
public there is no official tag. I just found a proposition (2) to tag
building=convent, building=monastery, buiding=seminary and even a
building=church (?)...
There is also a
On 20 August 2010 05:23, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I think the bigger issues is NearMap mistaking the intention and the word of
the license. We can debate for the next millennia the meaning of a future
free and open license under the specific wording of what that might mean.
These
Am 19.08.2010 21:39, schrieb Frank Fesevur:
2010/8/19 Pierre-Alain Dorange:
For convent, monestary and generally religious place but not open to the
public there is no official tag. I just found a proposition (2) to tag
building=convent, building=monastery, buiding=seminary and even a
Hi,
SteveC wrote:
It's holding the past data hostage I don't personally feel is very cool.
Agree that it isn't cool but then again everyone is doing it - i mean
how often have read I am against the license, if you go ahead then
prepare to delete X. Makes me want to go there and throw the
Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com wrote:
It is not only about NearMap, we have tens of goverment sources which
requires attribution.
Yes but not really sure of the kinf of attribution.
For example here in France, the fiscal administration allow us (OSM
contributors) to use the cadastre (1)
HOT, all,
Positive news from SPOT that their pre-disaster imagery of the flood affected
area of Pakistan is now available for use in OSM.
The WMS url is
http://www.geodatawork.net/__streaminguid.e30dcaa3-5929-4902-9834-12e6f51e1e7b/wms.ashx?
Before using the imagery, please review the legal
2010/8/19 Pierre-Alain Dorange pdora...@mac.com:
Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com wrote:
It is not only about NearMap, we have tens of goverment sources which
requires attribution.
Yes but not really sure of the kinf of attribution.
For example here in France, the fiscal administration
OK, this stupidity has gone too far.
Now the 'moderator' is arguing with the trolls on a 'moderated' list.
I quit this list.
--
Cheers, Chris
user: chillly
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't see incompatibility here, or do i miss something ?
Do OSM have to put the name of all the attribution for the maps
displayed ?
Do the new licence/CT require that we do not use the source tag
anymore ?
Anyone can remove source tag
Hi,
Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
Cheers and have nice copyright violation day,
The legal-talk list is an excellent place to discuss about copyright and
its applicability to geodata, and indeed has been for the last few years.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ##
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010, Chris Hill wrote:
OK, this stupidity has gone too far.
Now the 'moderator' is arguing with the trolls on a 'moderated' list.
I quit this list.
I see you use Thunderbird. I'm sure you can filter off any correspondents
whose posts annoy you and not have to leave the
1 - 100 of 258 matches
Mail list logo
