Hello list,
I'm getting the local mappers of Haiti to map the taptap routes in Port au
Prince.
Has anyone already mapped the transit network of a similar country?
There's a brief mention of shared taxis in the
wikihttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Shared_transportbut not very
helpful.
We're
It makes perfect sense to me and I totally agree.
But I assume you mean ways in stead of nodes in 'So the route relations
should only contain (a preferably) continuous set of nodes'
On top of that, I find it handy when the route realations have a name,
so it is easy to see which are the
On Wednesday 31 August 2011 15:12:05 Gerard Vanderveken wrote:
It makes perfect sense to me and I totally agree.
But I assume you mean ways in stead of nodes in 'So the route relations
should only contain (a preferably) continuous set of nodes'
On top of that, I find it handy when the
Ben Laenen wrote:
On Wednesday 31 August 2011 15:12:05 Gerard Vanderveken wrote:
It makes perfect sense to me and I totally agree.
But I assume you mean ways in stead of nodes in 'So the route relations
should only contain (a preferably) continuous set of nodes'
On top of that, I find
On Wednesday 31 August 2011 16:09:54 Gerard Vanderveken wrote:
That is OK for JOSM, but a list like this (at the bottom) is simply not
meaningful.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/917?relation_page=3
Then go complain to whoever is in charge of how that page is rendered?
This
That is OK for JOSM, but a list like this (at the bottom) is simply not
meaningful.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/917?relation_page=3
This is much clearer.
Then ask for that page to display a note=* tag when a name=* is absent,
like JOSM does.
But why would you start
I created route and network relations as is described on that page; so far,
so good. There is no way of grouping networks (yet) though. That's what I'm
using the collection relation for.
Kind regards,
Polyglot
2011/8/31 Lennard l...@xs4all.nl
That is OK for JOSM, but a list like this (at the
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 05:37:11PM +0200, Jan Herrygers wrote:
In principle you can not combine licenses. Because they are all not
compatible, even if they are also some kind of 'open', except for
Public Domain, were you can do what you want.
Licenses can be compatible, there are
Would the LWG support assigning the change sets of mappers that have
made some kind of PD/CC0 declaration, to mappers that are willing to
vouch for the data and accept the CTs?
At least for mappers that have not explicitly declined the CTs this
would seem to be doable without creating a
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
Would the LWG support assigning the change sets of mappers that have made
some kind of PD/CC0 declaration, to mappers that are willing to vouch for
the data and accept the CTs?
This seems simple. All you need to do is
Hi Simon,
Basically no. Our stance is that the only copy of their data that is
accessible is what they contributed only under CC-BY-SA in a database
which is published CC-BY-SA. Whilst that stance may be arguable, the
number of contributors is small, (3?), there is still a paradox between
Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote on 31/08/2011 03:43:28 PM:
What about the people who didn't agree to the CT, but whose data is in
the public domain?
Hi Russ,
The suggestion here is to streamline a process, more than determine
policy.. That is to..
1. Automatically hide trivial changes
Am 31.08.2011 02:19, schrieb Ian Sergeant:
I think the strategy to remove all non-CT compliant data in one big
bang is flawed.
I don't know of anybody who has proposed such a strategy (well at least
nobody serious about the matter). It is clear, at the very end, there
will be some
On 31 August 2011 17:06, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
- ignore trolling by JohnSmith
Funny way to ignore someone, in any case here's at least one particular example:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/aharvey/diary/14416
___
talk mailing list
On 8/31/2011 3:06 AM, Simon Poole wrote:
- use the license status tools in Potlatch and JOSM when you are editing
anyway to only leave compliant data after an edit (for example by not
moving non-compliant nodes in a way, but by replacing them). This is
naturally assuming that you have tracks and
Am 31.08.2011 09:16, schrieb Nathan Edgars II:
Hoe about this: if you decide to delete data that the OSMF has decided
not to accept, look at the history and only delete what's necessary.
There's no need to make it harder on ordinary mappers who don't care
about the license change.
I
maning sambale [mailto:emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com] wrote on 29. August 2011
19:33
Has anyone tried this?
http://androidboy1.blogspot.com/2010/10/smart-measure-ver-10-manual.html
Cool tool for 3d mapping. :)
We like the creativity and innovation behind this distance-measuring app,
but it
I would go so far as to say, don't delete *anything* until legally you
absolutely have to. There are a number of non-CT-accepting contributors in my
area, for instance, and I don't think the map should be interfered with unless
it's absolutely necessary. Remember that by doing so, the quality
[follow-ups should be to legal-talk yadda yadda]
Russ Nelson wrote:
What about the people who didn't agree to the CT, but whose data is
in the public domain?
See
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2011-August/006608.html
et seq.
Given that LWG doesn't appear to be changing
On 31/08/2011 10:47, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
[1] the stuff that people have built useful stuff on, that is. I doubt
anyone would miss the random landuse
... or the NPE-derived waterways in Southern England (given that we now
have far better sources for those).
The problem with that of
Why not do what Wikipedia did and work together with the licence authors (in
this
case Creative Commons and Open Data Commons) to provide an automatic upgrade
clause? Then nothing need be deleted.
--
Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com
___
talk mailing list
Ed Avis wrote:
Why not do what Wikipedia did and work together with the licence authors
(in
this case Creative Commons and Open Data Commons) to provide an automatic
upgrade clause? Then nothing need be deleted.
I expressly asked this a couple of years ago:
On 8/31/2011 8:48 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Ed Avis wrote:
Why not do what Wikipedia did and work together with the licence authors
(in
this case Creative Commons and Open Data Commons) to provide an automatic
upgrade clause? Then nothing need be deleted.
I expressly asked this a couple
Hi, I wanted to know if there is a way to search in nominatim for certain
type of objects
(for example, only nodes with key=place).
Thanks,
Ignacio.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Richard Fairhurst richard at systemed.net writes:
Why not do what Wikipedia did and work together with the licence authors
I expressly asked this a couple of years ago:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2009-February/001971.html
and was told no:
things have changed since then, might be worth revisiting
On 8/31/2011 5:48 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Ed Avis wrote:
Why not do what Wikipedia did and work together with the licence authors
(in
this case Creative Commons and Open Data Commons) to provide an automatic
upgrade clause? Then
I am using the QGIS OSM POLY export plugin to create POLY files that I
use to cut datasets from the planet.
It does however not seem to support multipolygons, even though the
POLY format does[1].
See an example here:
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/mCQCZsHHlWWkDdTtIjGj1w?feat=directlink
Am I
Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote on 31/08/2011 05:29:46 PM:
I wouldn't over exaggerate the issue, in many many countries it's
actually quite difficult to find non-compliant objects and in the
countries where there are widespread issues the mappers are in general
aware of the situation
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
What about the people who didn't agree to the CT, but whose data is in
the public domain?
Isn't all data in the public domain?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Given that LWG doesn't appear to be changing its IMO daft stance that a
user placing their data in the public domain is not good enough for us, I
am seriously tempted to delete and reimport TimSC's data[1] under my
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
The other interesting thing is that when I was finished, pretty much
none of the ways I drew and/or imported from the gps, had names on
them! (I did the surveying alone and didn't care to pull over every
time I saw a sign, or to
Ben wrote
AFAIK there is no PD source of postcode data.
The vibes I was getting, and of course I may have misinterpreted these, are
that if we made any sort of decent case that the current ABS data, as
imported into OSM is of some benifit in respect to disaster preparedness
and/or disaster
On 26/08/2011, at 1:33 PM, Nick Hocking wrote:
I'm sure all the avid tracersout there will deny this,but, I
believe that this is the downside to tracing. Once an area looks
well mapped, there is little incentive for anyone to go there to map
it properly. I'd really like it if all roads
Am 30.08.11 21:50, schrieb Werner Hoch:
On Dienstag, 30. August 2011, Wolfgang Wienke wrote:
Funktioniert bestimmt ganz einfach, nur ich finde es nicht:
Wie/ Wo bekomme ich zu einen bestimmten GPS-Position/ einem
bestimmten Ort die Nummer der zugehörigen Kachel der Karte?
Am 25.08.2011 15:24, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
Wenn die Corine Daten so schlecht sind, wieso werden sie dann importiert ?
die Franzosen haben sich dafür entschieden. Corine ist nicht per se
schlecht, nur entspricht der Maßstab halt nicht dem, was man für
höhere Zoomstufen in OSM
Michael von Glasow mich...@vonglasow.com wrote:
Oder weil man mit deutlich weniger Aufwand eine einigermaßen passabel
aussehende Karte bekommt – zumindest für bestimmte Objekte. Für niedrige
Zoomstufen und zur groben Orientierung reicht die Präzision von CORINE ja.
Der CORINE Import hat
Hallo Chris,
Und wenn man einen genaueren Verlauf eines Waldes hat wird der einfach
per layer=-2 unter den Corinne Wald gelegt
Ja, das mit den Layern müsste man vielleicht mal wieder erklären.
Es gibt zunehmend layer=-1..-5
Beispielsweise weil Häuser auf dem Boden stehen,
wird der Boden
Liebe OSMer,
Die INTERGEO ist die eine der weltgrössten Messen für Geo-Informatik.
Dieses Jahr findet sie in Nürnberg statt:
www.intergeo.de
Di 27. - Do-29. 11. 2011
Der Veranstalter bietet der OpenSource-Gemeinde im Vorfeld Raum für ein
_BarCamp_
- Mo+Di 26.-27.11.
- Platz und Infrastruktur
Am 31. August 2011 09:17 schrieb Chris66 chris66...@gmx.de:
Am 25.08.2011 15:24, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
Wenn die Corine Daten so schlecht sind, wieso werden sie dann importiert ?
die Franzosen haben sich dafür entschieden. Corine ist nicht per se
schlecht, nur entspricht der Maßstab
Il 30 agosto 2011 21:44, sabas88 saba...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Ma i Municipi come divisione amministrativa (ex Circoscrizioni, a Milano
esistono le Zone che sono un corrispettivo) non dovrebbero essere
rappresentati come boundary=administrative?
si, per esempio in un Municipio ci sono uno o
Il 30 agosto 2011 23:39, Maurizio Napolitano napoo...@gmail.com ha scritto:
io metterei
access = private
alla fine ci entrano solo quelli che hanno le chiavi come in tutti
gli accessi privati,
No?
+1
--
ciao
Luca
http://gis.cri.fmach.it/delucchi/
www.lucadelu.org
2011/8/30 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
Si, ho pensato di poter usarlo anche per le zone industriali (forse la
parola neighbourhood non è il massimo, ma non ho trovato altro). Per
quartieri indipendenti (in periferia, isolate, che non fanno parte
di una entità suburb più grande)
grazie, non ero stato capace di trovarlo sulla wiki
Il giorno 30 agosto 2011 10:54, niubii f.pelu...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Oltre alle indicazioni di Martin, mi permetto di suggerire:
- Edificio per impianto:
power=sub-station
Ciao
/niubii/
Il 30 agosto 2011 09:37, Stefano Tampieri
2011/8/30 Ruggero giurr...@gmail.com:
Uno degli ingressi del mio dipartimento si apre con un tesserino che
solo alcune persone possiedono.
buidling = entrance
access = ??
ho fatto una proposta per questo:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/New_barrier_types
quindi lo
Intendi i rioni o le classificazioni a zone storiche dei paesi immagino..
Sarebbe da chiarire il fatto che si possa usare anche per le classificazioni
tradizionali e non solo per quelle (semi)amministrative.. (Anche i
paesetti in Sardegna hanno diverse zone con il loro nome, nel paese di mia
nonna
2011/8/30 sabas88 saba...@gmail.com:
Si, per fare un esempio di Genova, Pontedecimo potrebbe essere un suburb,
mentre il sestiere della Maddalena o San Martino diventerebbero
Neighborhood..
Ma i Municipi come divisione amministrativa (ex Circoscrizioni, a Milano
esistono le Zone che sono un
2011/8/31 Sky One sky...@skyone.it:
2011/8/30 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
Vediamo se ho capito: suburb si usa per i Municipi (tipo quelli di Roma), le
Zone (di Milano) e così via; insomma, con confini amministrativi, giusto?
no. Confini amministrativi si mappano con
2011/8/31 sabas88 saba...@gmail.com:
Intendi i rioni o le classificazioni a zone storiche dei paesi immagino..
+1
Sarebbe da chiarire il fatto che si possa usare anche per le classificazioni
tradizionali e non solo per quelle (semi)amministrative.
nono, non c'entra proprio
Stavo chiacchierando con un mio amico che vive a Battipaglia (SA), che
mi faceva notare come OSM dalle sue parti sia impossibile da usare,
Addirittura, mi dice, in tutta Avellino nemmeno ci sono i nomi delle
strade. Lui non sa fare nulla col PC e non si azzarda a provare a
inserirli, e quindi
Ciao a tutti,
come promesso vorrei fare qui una proposta per la mappatura degli
stabilimenti balneari italiani, in modo da raggiungere un certo
livello di consenso prima di andare ad aggiornare la pagina
beach_resort sul wiki.
Da esperienze personali e mail scambiate qui in ML farei la seguente
Mi intrometto e segnalo che ho usato barrier=guard_rail qui¹, mi pare una
ottima proposta che andrebbe votata :)
Ciao,
Stefano
¹ http://osm.org/go/xWhVzzjf
2011/8/31 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
ho fatto una proposta per questo:
2011/8/31 sabas88 saba...@gmail.com:
Mi intrometto e segnalo che ho usato barrier=guard_rail qui¹, mi pare una
ottima proposta che andrebbe votata :)
si, avevo pensato la stessa cosa ed ho mandato un secondo RFC
(richiesta per commenti) su la tagging ML. Se non ci sono problemi
negli prossimi
2011/8/31 Fabrizio Tambussa ftambu...@gmail.com:
come promesso vorrei fare qui una proposta per la mappatura degli
stabilimenti balneari italiani, in modo da raggiungere un certo
livello di consenso prima di andare ad aggiornare la pagina
beach_resort sul wiki.
ottima iniziativa
Da
Med nya licensen kan väl den som publicerar välja licens helt själv (även
stängda licenser) - om vi pratar om egengjorda kartor från OSM-data?
Sen tolkar jag det som att vem som helst ändå får ta datat från en sån karta
och lägga in i OSM. Eller?
Och jag är osäker på om den som skapat kartan
Servus Lukas!
Ich habe mir gerade kurz Lech angeschaut , und ich finde, dass du das
genau richtig machst:
- Die Klassifizierungen scheinen zu stimmen, du unterscheidest brav
zwischen residential und service (BTW. es gibt noch eine weitere
Abstufung, nämlich highway=service + service=driveway für
On 08/31/2011 02:48 AM, Dauser Martin Johannes wrote:
Bei (Wander-)Wegen mache ich diese so genau wie möglich und bei Strassen
mit so wenigen Punkten wie möglich. Aber ich schaue trotzdem drauf, dass
der Kurvenverlauf erkennbar ist. Ist wohl auch eine Gefühlssache. Ich
glaube Norbert würde bei
Guten Tag!
Heute (31. August) um 10:43 tippte Norbert Wenzel:
Ich schreikrampfe nur wenn Geraden mit weiteren Nodes als Details
verbessert werden
Danke, das musste mal gesagt werden!! Es gibt ja Leute, die einfach
alle 10m einen Punkt setzen und trotzdem die Kurven nicht rund
bekommen.
Hallo!
Mir ist nur eins aufgefallen: arealway=station würde ich nur auf den Endnode der
Seilbahn machen, nicht /auch/ auf das Gebäude. Und den Namen der Seilbahn auf
den Tal- und Bergstation-Node setzen finde ich auch nicht ideal. IMO reicht der
Name der Seilbahn auf dem Way.
Sonst super.
Am Mittwoch, den 31.08.2011, 10:23 +0200 schrieb Stefan Kopetzky:
On 08/31/2011 02:48 AM, Dauser Martin Johannes wrote:
Bei (Wander-)Wegen mache ich diese so genau wie möglich und bei Strassen
mit so wenigen Punkten wie möglich. Aber ich schaue trotzdem drauf, dass
der Kurvenverlauf
Am Mittwoch, den 31.08.2011, 09:53 +0200 schrieb Boris Cornet:
(BTW. es gibt noch eine weitere
Abstufung, nämlich highway=service + service=driveway für einzelne
Hauszufahrten), sowie zwischen footway/path/track, daran scheitern
sehr viele Anfänger.
Meine persönliche Meinung:
footway
On 31.08.2011 22:20, Dauser Martin Johannes wrote:
footway verwende ich eingentlich überhaupt nicht mehr. footway ist ja
ein mit dem blauen Schild markierter Gehweg. Da nutze ich nur noch die
Kombination highway=path mit foot=designated.
Und nicht als Gehweg markierte Wege als highway=path
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31/08/11 22:20, Dauser Martin Johannes wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 31.08.2011, 09:53 +0200 schrieb Boris Cornet:
(BTW. es gibt noch eine weitere
Abstufung, nämlich highway=service + service=driveway für einzelne
Hauszufahrten), sowie zwischen
Hallo!
On 2011-08-31 22:56, Michael Maier wrote:
Meine persönliche Meinung:
Ich persönlich trenne footway und path folgendermaßen:
Ein Fußweg ist für mich befestigt und so breit, den ich mit Rollstuhl
oder Kinderwagen problemlos benützen kann (Meistens im Stadtgebiet oder
Park).
Ein
Guten Tag!
Oh je, geht das hier nun auch los...
Die 'richtige' Verwendung von path ist in Deutschland Anlass von
wüsten Beschimpfungen auf talk-de und für edit wars.
Da halte ich es eher mit der althergebrachten Weise, footway für die
Stadt und die Seepromenade, path für schmale Wanderwege.
On 31.08.2011 23:09, Boris Cornet wrote:
Da halte ich es eher mit der althergebrachten Weise, footway für die
Stadt und die Seepromenade, path für schmale Wanderwege.
Ich seh da jetzt, praktisch, nicht so wirklich den grossen Unterschied.
Blaues Schild oder nicht kann man getrost den
Am Mittwoch, den 31.08.2011, 22:44 +0200 schrieb Stefan Kopetzky:
On 31.08.2011 22:07, Dauser Martin Johannes wrote:
ich begründe diese Einstellung mit dem Österreichischen Waldgesetz
nachdem Latschen eine Sonderform des Waldes bilden.
Nix für ungut, aber mappst du für Juristen?
Alle
On 31.08.2011 23:14, Dauser Martin Johannes wrote:
da bist du offensichtlich der Wanderkartenspezialist.
Eher als Botaniker. Was Grünerlen sind musste ich erst googlen. :)
Natürlich hast du recht, dass dieser Bewuchs in der Praxis ähnlich
behindernd wie Latschen ist. Ich hab auch absolut nichts
On 01.09.2011 00:47, Dauser Martin Johannes wrote:
Verstehe ich recht, dass du als BOTANIKER die Grünerle nicht kanntest?!
geschockte Grüsse vom Ökologen
Gemeint war:
Eher Experte für Wanderkarten denn Botaniker :)
LG,
Stefan
___
Talk-at mailing
Hello,
I'm holding a meetup in Centurion in September:
Place: Butcher Brothers, Centurion Lake
It's a 1km walk from the Gautrain Station.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=-25.855983mlon=28.187862zoom=18layers=M
Time Date: The first person to confirm can pick a date. The date
must be before
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:23 AM, G. Michael Carter
mi...@carterfamily.ca wrote:
Andrew,
In addition to the missing lakes and marshes documented on talk-ca here's
another if your keeping a list:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.98365lon=-77.7393zoom=17layers=M
Also as another FYI you may
Any eta on when you'll be finish with the lake Ontario coastline?
Sent from my iPhone
On 2011-09-01, at 12:19 AM, Andrew MacKinnon andrew...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:23 AM, G. Michael Carter
mi...@carterfamily.ca wrote:
Andrew,
In addition to the missing lakes and marshes
Salut,
Ce n'est pas encore officiellement annoncé mais c'est en place ; le
service SIG de la Région Nord-Pas-de-Calais vient de passer ses données
sous licence ODBL.
Les fichiers, la plupart en shapefile, sont accessibles ici :
http://sigale.nordpasdecalais.fr
Pour vous inscrire, c'est ici :
Bonjour,
De : didier2...@free.fr
la projection lambert 9 zones - zone 7 n'inclus pas ouessant dans
josm ... (ESPG 3948 45.5,-4.9,50.5,10.2)
La version latest de JOSM (4383) inclut ce patch :
http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/6753
qui résout le problème en étendant un peu vers l'ouest la
Bonjour,
Il y a apparemment un petit problme de rendu Mapnik pour les
barrages. Quand un barrage est reprsent par un linaire simple pas
de souci, mais quand on le reprsente par un chemin ferm (pour
prciser l'emprise au sol du barrage) il n'est pas affich du tout.
Bravo !
C'est une très bonne nouvelle.
Je me demande si avec de plus en plus de libérations de données en
ODbL le changement de licence d'OSM ne va pas finalement faire gagner
plus de données que l'on va en perdre (sauf peut être pour les
Pyrénéens Atlantiques).
Fred
Le 31 août 2011 10:10,
On 31 août 2011, at 10:45, Nicolas Moyroud wrote:
Bonjour,
Il y a apparemment un petit problème de rendu Mapnik pour les barrages. Quand
un barrage est représenté par un linéaire simple pas de souci, mais quand on
le représente par un chemin fermé (pour préciser l'emprise au sol du
Trop bien! Mille mercis!
Le 31 août 2011 10:21, Vincent de Chateau-Thierry v...@laposte.net a écrit
:
Bonjour,
De : didier2...@free.fr
la projection lambert 9 zones - zone 7 n'inclus pas ouessant dans
josm ... (ESPG 3948 45.5,-4.9,50.5,10.2)
La version latest de JOSM (4383) inclut
Salut,
Je cherche à géolocaliser nos utilisateurs sur une carte.
J'ai des adresses postales en france avec :
(Numéro et) Nom de la rue
Code postal
Commune
J'ai essayé dans une requète à nomatim de ce type (pour restreindre à la
france, j'ai ajouté le paramètre countrycode=fr) :
Salut,
As-tu essayé d'écrire le département en toutes lettres au lieu du code
postal ? J'ai l'impression que c'est ok en écrivant CHER.
Frédéric
Le 31 août 2011 11:53, Jean jean_cart...@yahoo.com a écrit :
Salut,
Je cherche à géolocaliser nos utilisateurs sur une carte.
J'ai des adresses
J'ai essayé dans une requète à nomatim de ce type (pour restreindre à la
france, j'ai ajouté le paramètre countrycode=fr) :
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/search?q=52+RUE+DE+LA+CARTELEE,+18200+SAINT+AMAND+MONTRONDcountrycode=frformat=xmladdressdetails=1
rien
Salut,
J'ai déjà évoqué ce problème en juillet:
http://www.mail-archive.com/talk-fr@openstreetmap.org/msg33701.html mais le
problème n'est toujours pas réglé :(
Romain
Le 31 août 2011 11:53, Jean jean_cart...@yahoo.com a écrit :
Salut,
Je cherche à géolocaliser nos utilisateurs sur une
En fait j'ai l'impression que la Rue de la Cartelee n'existe pas
encore sur OSM pour cette commune. Essaie avec Rue Fredt par exemple,
ça marche bien. Et ce même en utilisant le code postal 18200, sans
écrire Cher.
Frédéric
Le 31 août 2011 11:58, Frédéric Bonifas fredericboni...@gmail.com a
Le mardi 30 août 2011 à 14:04 +0100, Emilie Laffray a écrit :
Bonjour,
Bonjour aussi ;)
juste un petit rappel que les elections pour la fondation OSMF sont pour
bientot. Il y a pour le moment 7 candidats pour 4 postes (Mikel, Ivan,
Simone et la mienne).
Je conseille d'a tous les membres
Bonjour,
Afin de voir où l'on en est sur la qualité des fichiers bâti issus du
cadastre, j'en ai récupéré quelques uns sur cleo, et j'ai tenté d'identifier
les pb récurrents que le contributeur doit gérer quand il se lance dans
l'aventure import du bati:
1. Des noeuds en doubles ou très
Salut,
À la fin des itérations, s'il n'y a pas d'effet de bord, je ferai passer
automatiquement chaque commune générée par ces moulinettes.
Philippe
Le 31/08/2011 20:36, Bruno Cortial a écrit :
Bonjour,
Afin de voir où l'on en est sur la qualité des fichiers bâti issus du
cadastre, j'en ai
Ouh la,
non je ne me présente pas :) J'ai donne l'an dernier.
Pour se présenter ou pour voter, il faut être membre de la fondation.
Emilie Laffray
2011/8/31 nono pingven...@free.fr
Le mardi 30 août 2011 à 14:04 +0100, Emilie Laffray a écrit :
Bonjour,
Bonjour aussi ;)
juste un petit
* les erreurs liées aux arrondis des coordonnées:
- on valide avec josm.
- on telecharge de nouveau la zone = la validation josm en trouve
d'autres
- on verifie sur osmose.openstreetmap.fr 2 jours après, on trouve
encore d'autres erreurs
si apres avoir telechargé le fichier .osm
?
Overpass API
Overpass??OSM??(ID?)???
?
OSM3 project
XAPI?ONLY?XML??API??
???
XAPI???
Original Message
Subject:[OSM-talk] Overpass API: new
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 06:58:58AM +0900, Hiroshi Miura wrote:
素晴らしいのは、浅草は充実しています。
http://osm.org/go/7Q54xlWMH-
田町あたりはいかがでしょうか。
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.6473289430141lon=139.745927453041zoom=17
oota
___
Talk-ja mailing list
(2011年08月31日 22時00分15秒), ribbon wrote:
素晴らしいのは、浅草は充実しています。
http://osm.org/go/7Q54xlWMH-
田町あたりはいかがでしょうか。
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.6473289430141lon=139.745927453041zoom=17
おー、すごい！！ いつのまに...
このくらい充実すると、いいですね！
三浦
___
Talk-ja mailing
ribbonさん、ありがとうございます。
特に問題なさそうですね。
東
11/08/31 ribbon o...@ns.ribbon.or.jp:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:13:56AM +0900, Shu Higashi wrote:
2.浜松町モノレール駅から北にtramが少し延びています。
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/16685130
ここにそのような線路はありましたっけ？
ありません。
何人かの方が編集されているので単純な間違いとも思えず
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/planning/statistics/gis/roaddata.shtm
This is public domain per Microdecisions, Inc. v. Skinner (though I'm
waiting on a reply from FDOT confirming that they agree).
After checking all current maxspeed tags against the data to ensure
accuracy, I plan to use this as
Response I received in 2008
GIS data provided by the FDOT Transportation Statistics Office isconsidered
to be in the public domain and can be used for any purpose.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Potential_Datasources#Copy_of_email_from_FDOT
I had looked at this a while back and gave up
On 8/31/2011 9:57 PM, Dale Puch wrote:
Anyways that is why I am interested in how you plan to attack it.
I haven't started, but I plan to convert to .osm using gpsbabel and then
use the JOSM 'routes' plugin to color the maxspeed values of the background.
Oh, I forgot to mention they list the files as being updated weekly. So
apparently what ever changes they make that week get rolled into the data.
So make sure to start with a current set of data.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Response I received in 2008
On 8/31/2011 9:57 PM, Dale Puch wrote:
For me it was partly an issue of the data covering a large land area,
then only able to download small chunks from OSM to edit.
For this, a xapi query of relation[network=US:FL] gets all the state
road relations.
So a query to http://www.overpass-api.de/query_form.html
union
query type=relation
has-kv k=network v=US:FL/
/query
recurse type=relation-node into=nodes/
recurse type=relation-way/
recurse type=way-node/
/union
print/
Returns all relations with [network=US:FL], as well as the ways
On 9/1/2011 1:02 AM, Dale Puch wrote:
If a way with [network=US:FL] is NOT in a relation, will it be returned
by this?
I don't think any ways have this tag.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/31/2011 9:57 PM, Dale Puch wrote:
Anyways that is why I am interested in how you plan to attack it.
I haven't started, but I plan to convert to .osm using gpsbabel and then use
the JOSM 'routes' plugin to color
On 9/1/2011 1:19 AM, Toby Murray wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Nathan Edgars IInerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/31/2011 9:57 PM, Dale Puch wrote:
Anyways that is why I am interested in how you plan to attack it.
I haven't started, but I plan to convert to .osm using gpsbabel and
100 matches
Mail list logo
