Re: [Talk-it] Terminiamo la traduzione del Tasking Manager 3

tanto per tenere elevato l'hype e far venire l'acquolina in bocca a tutti noi comuni utilizzatori, linko la descrizione del nuovo tasking manager (TM) 3 con indicato cosa c'è di nuovo rispetto al TM 2. [1] io non vedo l'ora che arrivi :-) [1]https://tasks.hotosm.org/what-is-new - Ciao,

Re: [Talk-it] Terminiamo la traduzione del Tasking Manager 3

tanto per tenere elevato l'hype e far venire l'acquolina in bocca a tutti noi comuni utilizzatori, linko la descrizione del nuovo tasking manager (TM) 3 con indicato cosa c'è di nuovo rispetto al TM 2. io non vedo l'ora che arrivi :-) - Ciao, Aury -- Sent from:

Re: [Talk-us] The San Jose / Santa Clara border

On 2019-01-28 12:40, OSM Volunteer stevea wrote: (Lengthy reply alert) Hi Minh: Thanks for your (always thorough and well-researched) pointers and history — though I don't recall "impressing LAFCO" upon you, I did mention it in the context of admin_level, so, OK, whatever! Good for Santa

Re: [OSM-talk-be] arlon - osm - training courses: JOSM and PICC

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:40 PM Pierre Parmentier wrote: Hello, The two planned training sessions

[Talk-pe] Retos de MapRoulette de Perú

Hola OSM Peru, Esto es Andrew del equipo de mapas de Apple. Llevamos algún tiempo trabajando en el red vial (https://github.com/osmlab/appledata/issues/52) y recientemente usado nuestro herramienta Atlas para análisis de datos (https://github.com/osmlab/atlas )

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

Companies House don't validate anything. That much is well known. What Richard was saying was that if you use their web form to submit then it autocompletes using PAF but most older entries will have been submitted on paper with no such normalisation. Tom On 29/01/2019 00:00, Will Phillips

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

Hi Paul, Once you get out into rural areas, it's sometimes the case that an entire hamlet is covered by a one or two postcodes. There may be named streets but according to RM/PAF these are ignored and such addresses take the form: building name/number, locality, post town, postcode. The more

Re: [Talk-pt] Desafio mensal

Boa iniciativa. :) Pedro Lima escreveu no dia segunda, 28/01/2019 à(s) 23:33: > Conforme falado pelo telegram para dinamizar e coordenar melhor as edições > feitas pela comunidade, deixo vos o link para quem quiser participar no > desafio mensal: > https://tarefas.openstreetmap.pt/project/2

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

Chris, what would you see as a good data model for a UK address in OSM? Just house number/name, street, postcode? It has been mentioned a couple of times in this thread that the "addr:" model was intended in the UK to contain postal addresses, not any other sort of address. Are you suggesting only

Re: [Talk-it] Whodidit non funziona, alternative?

Il giorno lun 28 gen 2019 alle ore 21:20 Marco ha scritto: > Buonasera a tutti, sono ormai 10/15 giorni che Whodidit non funziona più > a dovere. Nella speranza che possa tornare a funzionare, quali altri > servizi simili esistono? > Ciao Marco, c'è OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/ A mio

Re: [talk-cz] Hromadná editace/úkol pro všechny? Bylo: Seznam vodních ploch se špatnou kategoriií

Ty největší rybníky a přehrady jsem opravil je toho dohně na ty malé je třeba udělt pomoci robota - ano to landuse=reservoir vzniklo to nějakým importem. Michal čt 24. 1. 2019 v 14:04 odesílatel majka napsal: > > On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 at 13:18, Pavel Machek wrote: >> >> Ja porad nechapu co

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

Sorry, I only have yet more questions. Once you get out into rural areas, it's sometimes the case that an entire hamlet is covered by a one or two postcodes. There may be named streets but according to RM/PAF these are ignored and such addresses take the form: building name/number, locality, post

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

On 28/01/2019 21:56, Colin Smale wrote: On 2019-01-28 22:22, Chris Hill wrote: Post town do not exist, and never have. They are a fiction invented by Royal Mail for their own internal use which they persuaded the public into using for the sole benefit of Royal Mail. ...and for the benefit

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

I'm not quite sure what you've done with the quoting but you've attributed me as writing your reply, which evidently I didn't. :) Will Phillips wrote: > I really don't see what is outlandish about using post towns as a > guide for what goes in the addr:city tag. Royal Mail might be becoming >

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

On 2019-01-28 22:22, Chris Hill wrote: > Post town do not exist, and never have. They are a fiction invented by Royal > Mail for their own internal use which they persuaded the public into using > for the sole benefit of Royal Mail. ...and for the benefit of anyone posting a letter and

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

On 28/01/2019 18:50, Lester Caine wrote: On 28/01/2019 18:24, Will Phillips wrote: There are certainly occasions when the street name is needed. For example, I recently surveyed a single postcode (DE72 2HP) containing two houses with the same house name, but different street names.

Re: [Talk-us] The San Jose / Santa Clara border

(Lengthy reply alert) Hi Minh: Thanks for your (always thorough and well-researched) pointers and history — though I don't recall "impressing LAFCO" upon you, I did mention it in the context of admin_level, so, OK, whatever! Good for Santa Clara LAFCO for publishing municipal boundaries into

[Talk-it] Whodidit non funziona, alternative?

Buonasera a tutti, sono ormai 10/15 giorni che Whodidit non funziona più a dovere. Nella speranza che possa tornare a funzionare, quali altri servizi simili esistono? Grazie Marco ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org

[OSM-talk-be] Next OSM Arlon meetup 4th February / Prochaine réunion OSM Arlon 4 février

Hello!/Bonjour! The next OpenStreetMap Arlon meetup is scheduled on Monday 4th of February, 19h30. Everyone welcome, from the perfect beginner to the experienced mapper! All infos and subscription here: https://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/events/257183572/ La prochaine rencontre

Re: [Talk-at] EGU mapathon Wien - help needed :)

Hi Faith, Stefan asked for the topic of the mapathon and not what it is. There were few mapathons in Austria in the past. I only attended one which was organized by the Red Cross organisation and we had to map some place at Ethiopia for a water ressource project. Kind regards Andreas as

Re: [Talk-it] marciapiedi e strisce pedonali

Io da quando avevo scoperto che iD aveva "inquinato" tutto con crossing=zebra (per esempio https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dieterdreist/diary/42243 ) ho deciso di utilizzare anch'io crossing=zebra invece di "uncontrolled", il quale non mi è mai piaciuto molto (le strisce e in generale la

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

On 28/01/2019 15:06, Richard Fairhurst wrote: I really don't see what is outlandish about using post towns as a guide for what goes in the addr:city tag. Royal Mail might be becoming less important, but when most people are asked for their address, they will give their address as defined by

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

On 28/01/2019 18:24, Will Phillips wrote: On 28/01/2019 17:28, Lester Caine wrote: The reality is that for the UK ALL we need is the Postcode to supply a reference to the Royal Mail 'postal address' as that is purely a Royal Mail invention anyway.  I personally don't see the need to add

Re: [Talk-it] marciapiedi e strisce pedonali

Io dove li ho creati ho seguito le linee guida della wiki https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6132935657 Il giorno lun 28 gen 2019 alle ore 19:36 Martin Koppenhoefer < dieterdre...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > Am Mo., 28. Jan. 2019 um 18:41 Uhr schrieb Volker Schmidt < > vosc...@gmail.com>: > >>

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import update

Hey Nate, I've also looked into it and came across this paper: https://www.josis.org/index.php/josis/article/view/276/166 Sounds like what we need. IMO this is the kind of stuff that needs to be dealt with in JOSM on a per-square basis rather than modifying original data. So you have control over

Re: [Talk-at] EGU mapathon Wien - help needed :)

Hi Stefan, Thanks for your interest. A mapathon is a mapping party ('mapping marathon'). These are quite popular in London: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAcsCmvG2hs A group gets together to work on mapping an area through the HOT Tasking Manager, and usually pizza is served :) If these don't

Re: [Talk-it] marciapiedi e strisce pedonali

Am Mo., 28. Jan. 2019 um 18:41 Uhr schrieb Volker Schmidt : > crossing_ref è pensato solo per il Regno Unito > qualcuno lo pensa così, per me è assurdo creare un tag "generico" e limitare l'uso su un solo territorio nazionale. Se guardi la mappa è usato d'ovunque

Re: [Talk-it] marciapiedi e strisce pedonali

Volker, guardando la pagina wiki sembra che non sia più così, quella in inglese dice che inizialmente era documentato solo come utilizzato nel Regno Unito, ma con l'adozione dell'editor iD il suo uso si è diffuso ovunque. Stando alla descrizione e vedendo l'immagine riportata mi sembra il nostro

Re: [Talk-it] marciapiedi e strisce pedonali

Am Mo., 28. Jan. 2019 um 18:02 Uhr schrieb Volker Schmidt : > Finora l'uso più frequente è: > highway=crossing > crossing=uncontrolled|traffic_signal|island|unmarked > supervised=no|yes|(orario)default: "no" > crossing_ref (solo UK) > tactile_paving=yes|no!incorrect (per non vedenti) ancora

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

On 28/01/2019 17:28, Lester Caine wrote: The reality is that for the UK ALL we need is the Postcode to supply a reference to the Royal Mail 'postal address' as that is purely a Royal Mail invention anyway.  I personally don't see the need to add 'addr:street' everywhere but that is what people

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

On 2019-01-28 18:32, Andrzej wrote: > Hi Will, > > These are very good examples, I wasn't aware of such places. They would > indeed best fit addr:locality. How about using addr:locality together with > addr:town/suburb/village/hamlet then? Having multiple well defined tags is > good - they

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import update

Ok John, je vais lancer le script pour Ottawa. Mais je dois régler petit soucis d'instabilité  windows avec java et osmosis.  Ne peut mettre a jour java. Et powershell refuse parfois de reconnaitre commandes exe. Parmi tous les scripts de conversion de raster / vectoriel, il serait oui

Re: [Talk-it] marciapiedi e strisce pedonali

crossing_ref è pensato solo per il Regno Unito On Mon, 28 Jan 2019, 18:12 Simone Saviolo Ho un po' di casi simile a quello che descrivi qui: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/45.31836/8.42792 > > I marciapiedi sono correttamente highway=footway, footway=sidewalk, mentre > l'attraversamento

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

Hi Will, These are very good examples, I wasn't aware of such places. They would indeed best fit addr:locality. How about using addr:locality together with addr:town/suburb/village/hamlet then? Having multiple well defined tags is good - they add useful information. We are not designing an

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

On 28/01/2019 15:31, Tom Hughes wrote: The notion that I should tag addresses in Charlbury with "addr:city=Chipping Norton", a town 6 miles away, just because one private delivery operator[1] uses Chipping Norton as an optional part of their addressing is... one of the more outlandish ideas

Re: [Talk-us] NC sidewalk data import

I'd like to second this! Also, hi Melanie! In case it adds useful context, I'd like to give my own recommendations: (1) get practice in mapping sidewalks yourself and (2) create an IP, metadata, work, verification, and upkeep plan for the import. For (1), the goal is to become familiar with the

Re: [Talk-it] marciapiedi e strisce pedonali

Aggiungerei anche il kerb nella giuntura attraversamento-marciapiede per il wheelchair routing Il lun 28 gen 2019, 18:12 Simone Saviolo ha scritto: > Ho un po' di casi simile a quello che descrivi qui: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/45.31836/8.42792 > > I marciapiedi sono

Re: [OSM-talk] Rendered boundary not present in data

You could try touching (i.e. creating a new version of) both of the boundary relations involved - in this case: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/189416 -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-it] marciapiedi e strisce pedonali

Ho un po' di casi simile a quello che descrivi qui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/45.31836/8.42792 I marciapiedi sono correttamente highway=footway, footway=sidewalk, mentre l'attraversamento diventa highway=footway, footway=crossing. Io metto le informazioni aggiuntive (soprattutto

Re: [Talk-it] marciapiedi e strisce pedonali

Finora l'uso più frequente è: highway=crossing crossing=uncontrolled|traffic_signal|island|unmarked supervised=no|yes|(orario)default: "no" crossing_ref (solo UK) tactile_paving=yes|no!incorrect (per non vedenti) ancora poco utilizzato bicyle=no|yes foot=no|yesdefault "yes" horse=no|yes

Re: [OSM-talk] Rendered boundary not present in data

Hi, Markus: I've seen this in a few places too. This is another example in Guinea-Conakry: https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=47.50350=-3.13473#map=14/11.6865/-12.6444=D And I tried to force tile rendering, that didn't solve the problem. I hope someone may give some light on this.

Re: [Talk-it] marciapiedi e strisce pedonali

Io di solito uso costriure la definizione dal generale al dettaglio, per cui highway>footway>crossing come in questa way [1] così etichettata: footway=crossing highway=footway surface=sett [1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/661127406 Il giorno lun 28 gen 2019 alle ore 16:35 Martin

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

Having said that, I still don't understand the objections to addr:town and addr:village. Can anyone come up with an example of an address where they wouldn't work? I normally don't care about names but locality sounds almost offensive. To me 'locality' just sounds neutral. I don't

Re: [Talk-us] NC sidewalk data import

Thanks, that's a very good video. On Mon, 2019-01-28 at 09:13 -0600, Joe Sapletal wrote: > If you haven’t seen it already, this was a good presentation from > SOTM a few months ago about Pedestrian Mapping. Nick briefly > discusses the plusses and minuses of adding sidewalk values to the >

Re: [Talk-it] marciapiedi e strisce pedonali

sent from a phone > On 28. Jan 2019, at 16:29, demon_box wrote: > > nel punto dell'attraversamento pedonale devo collegare i 2 marciapiedi con > una highway=footway oppure cosa? si, highway =footway e footway=crossing sulla way dell’attraversamento, mentre highway=crossing sul nodo di

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

On 28/01/2019 15:06, Richard Fairhurst wrote: The notion that I should tag addresses in Charlbury with "addr:city=Chipping Norton", a town 6 miles away, just because one private delivery operator[1] uses Chipping Norton as an optional part of their addressing is... one of the more outlandish

[Talk-it] marciapiedi e strisce pedonali

se ho un tratto di marciapiede a sinistra e a destra di una strada highway=footway + footway=sidewalk che poi ad un certo punto "incrociano" un attraversamento pedonale (highway=crossing) che permette di passare da un lato all'altro della strada nel punto dell'attraversamento pedonale devo

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import update

As far as I know Texas has been using 2 sources for their buildings imports. 1. Microsoft, (example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/32.74517/-97.14334) Even in suburbs (that are supposed to be easy for their AI), buildings lack any details and sometimes are not even aligned

Re: [Talk-us] NC sidewalk data import

If you haven’t seen it already, this was a good presentation from SOTM a few months ago about Pedestrian Mapping. Nick briefly discusses the plusses and minuses of adding sidewalk values to the existing road way vs creating a way that is the actual sidewalk/path that supports a pedestrian

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import update

Hi all, I was reading about orthogonalization yesterday and came across this paper... https://icaci.org/files/documents/ICC_proceedings/ICC2009/html/refer/19_2.pdf ...which describes an algorithm that seems to quite effectively disregard angles that are not close to orthogonal while

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

Is it possible to use addr:locality for both towns and villages? That could simplify things quite a bit and I have yet to see an address that needs a post town and two levels of localities below. Having said that, I still don't understand the objections to addr:town and addr:village. Can

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

Colin Smale wrote: > As you will know RM have their own particular ideas of the > geography of the UK, all done for their own convenience. It > would certainly avoid some confusion if we used addr:posttown > instead of addr:city. Fully agree. The notion that I should tag addresses in

Re: [Talk-us] NC sidewalk data import

I can only speak for the Triangle area, but many sidewalks are mapped as separate ways in this area. It is probably due to the very idiosyncratic spending on sidewalks that can begin and end in the middle of blocks and frequently do not have connections to the road at one end or the other.

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import update

Interesting, although I'm not sure what the best approach is. 31 Hamilton is interesting. If you look at the buildings next to it they don't have house numbers. Look at the history and you'll see it was first created in 2010 with potlatch and edited once more in 2011. At my first glance at

[OSM-talk-fr] État des routes en temps réel

Bonjour, Certes, ce n'est pas nouveau mais : 1/ c'est au fin fond de la France semi-montagneuse ; 2/ c'est basé sur osm et openlayer 3/ ça bouge ^^ C'est https://routes.correze.fr/ La couche « Conditions de circulation » n'est pas activée par défaut, en revanche celle des travaux et des

Re: [Talk-GB] Mapping Driving Test Centres

(Moment of reflection.) Sorry, you're right, of course they're not. That'll teach me to attempt to multitask at work. As you were. Regards, *Paul* On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 at 12:52, David Woolley wrote: > On 28/01/2019 12:45, Paul Berry wrote: > > Does

Re: [Talk-us] The San Jose / Santa Clara border

On 2019-01-26 17:13, OSM Volunteer stevea wrote: While I don't know quite who to call, exactly, if somebody wants to "release to me" ODbL-compatible data which need to be harmonized with what are now in OSM, I'll volunteer to be the "nexus of citizen entry" to assure they find their way into

Re: [Talk-GB] Mapping Driving Test Centres

Does https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddriving_school not fit the bill? Tag usage here: http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/tags/amenity=driving_school#map On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 at 12:08, Mike Baggaley wrote: > You could also add government=transportation to office=government > >

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

Hi Will, On 2019-01-28 13:19, Will Phillips wrote: > Hi, > > I agree we need another tag below addr:city for localities. For this I have > usually used addr:suburb when mapping in urban areas and addr:locality > elsewhere. Ideally I think it would be best to have just one recommended tag, >

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

Hi, I agree we need another tag below addr:city for localities. For this I have usually used addr:suburb when mapping in urban areas and addr:locality elsewhere. Ideally I think it would be best to have just one recommended tag, perhaps addr:locality, because having addr:town addr:village

Re: [Talk-us] NC sidewalk data import

The sidewalk style is somewhat controversial. For routing applications, it is simpler if the sidewalk is added as a tag on the highway. This also makes it easier to render clean-looking maps. However, some people prefer to have the sidewalks separately mapped, so that they can be seen at high zoom

Re: [talk-ph] Request for clarification on road tagging guidelines

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019, 7:12 PM grab osm via talk-ph < talk-ph@openstreetmap.org wrote: > But, how would we go about when we find a missing connector. Will it be a > good idea to tag it as highway = road? > Tag it with either the minor road type or the major link type. You can also look at

Re: [Talk-us] NC sidewalk data import

On 27.01.19 21:41, Melanie Mazanec wrote: > Hello, > > I'm a front end dev for a city government working on a side project to > fork and add to AccessMap  for North Carolina > cities. > > In order to make this happen, I want to import North Carolina city > sidewalk

Re: [Talk-de] Overpass Abfrage

Hallo Roland, das ist nun total verrückt, hatte gestern versucht mit dem area Wert eine Ausgabe liefern zulassen und es klappte nicht. Aber danke fürs drüber schauen. Gruß Am 28.01.2019 um 10:52 schrieb Roland Olbricht: > Hallo, > > area[name="Rettungsdienstbereich Trier"]; > out tags; > > hat

Re: [Talk-de] Overpass Abfrage

Hallo, area[name="Rettungsdienstbereich Trier"]; out tags; hat den folgenden Fund: und ( node[amenity=nursing_home](area:3604168993); way[amenity=nursing_home](area:3604168993); relation[type=multipolygon][amenity=nursing_home](area:3604168993); ); out

Re: [Talk-de] Overpass Abfrage

Hi, Was ich mich schon lange frage bzw. wünsche ist, dass auch bei anderen Output-Formaten als CSV (also den out settings xml,json,custom,popup) die Rückgabe-Attribute eingeschränkt werden könnten. Grundsätzlich geht das mit "convert", hat aber gewollte Einschränkungen. Beispiel: (

Re: [Talk-br] HOTOSM Tasking Manager - Barragem em Brumadinho

Oi pessoal, Antes de disponbilizar as imagens do PLEAIDES para os mapeadores de OpenStreetMap, é preciso documentar os termos de uso na wiki conforme descrito no post do blog. Uma imagem do Sentinel, que tem autorização de uso no OSM documentada, já foi utilizada para mapear a area de impacto:

[OSM-talk-fr] hebdoOSM Nº 444 2019-01-15-2019-01-21

Bonjour, Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 444 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître *en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur : http://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/11389/ Bonne lecture ! hebdoOSM ? Qui : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Où :

[Talk-ca] hebdoOSM Nº 444 2019-01-15-2019-01-21

Bonjour, Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 444 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître *en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur : http://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/11389/ Bonne lecture ! hebdoOSM ? Qui : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Où :

[Talk-ht] hebdoOSM Nº 444 2019-01-15-2019-01-21

Bonjour, Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 444 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître *en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur : http://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/11389/ Bonne lecture ! hebdoOSM ? Qui : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Où :

[Talk-africa] hebdoOSM Nº 444 2019-01-15-2019-01-21

Bonjour, Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 444 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître *en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur : http://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/11389/ Bonne lecture ! hebdoOSM ? Qui : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Où :

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Incontri mensili nel nuovo anno?

Intendi lunedì 4? Flaminia Sent from my iPhone > On 27 Jan 2019, at 08:44, Marcello Pelato wrote: > > Quindi per il 7 va bene a tutti e due? > (Almeno tra quelli che hanno risposto...) > > On Friday, January 25, 2019, 7:50:23 PM GMT+1, > wrote: > > > Arghh io lunedì 28 non ci sono,

Re: [talk-ph] Request for clarification on road tagging guidelines

There is a list: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Link_roads_between_different_highways_types But not everyone agrees. ;) Agree with Eugene here. It depends on the traffic-flow and general purpose of that segment. On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 4:13 PM Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: > Hi Lavanya, > >

Re: [talk-cz] Drobnosti k mapovani lyzarskych rozcestniku

so 26. 1. 2019 v 21:00 odesílatel Pavel Machek napsal: > On Fri 2019-01-18 14:50:59, gorn wrote: > > >Ahoj, > > > > > >narazil jsem na lyzarsky rozcestnik KCT, ktery ma v nazvu krome klasickych > > >"bus", "zst" atd. pismenko "P" v cernem poli. Asi pro parkoviste, viz: > >

Re: [talk-ph] Request for clarification on road tagging guidelines

Hi Lavanya, I personally would tag this the same as the side street and not the link version of the major road. My reason is: imagine if the side street actually goes through the major road to the other side. To me it makes logical sense that the minor street retains the characteristics such as