Als ik tijdens een wandeling een wandelknooppunt tegenkom dan probeer ik dat
in te brengen in de hoop dat ik een klein steentje kan bijdragen aan
diegenen die van de wandelknooppunten hun 'levenswerk' maken.
In dat verband heb ik twee vragen.
Bij mijn thuiskomst kom ik dikwijls tot de
De andere.optie.is in je browser hikeandbikemap.de weergeven, maar echt
handig werkt dat niet op.zo'n klein schermpje.
Jo
On Mar 9, 2014 1:49 PM, Guy Vanvuchelen guy.vanvuche...@gmail.com wrote:
Als ik tijdens een wandeling een wandelknooppunt tegenkom dan probeer ik
dat in te brengen in de
From: Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com
Message-ID:
CAJKJX-TvoABas26ikSVEK-FwA=zNMEaiL2GeKg=h5cwb7x2...@mail.gmail.com
2014-03-09 13:49 GMT+01:00 Guy Vanvuchelen guy.vanvuche...@gmail.com:
Bij mijn thuiskomst kom ik dikwijls tot de vaststelling dat ik
verschillende knooppunten heb
Eigenaardig. Het waren nochtans houten palen zoals ik die al dikwijls
tegengekomen ben en ik heb er minstens 5 gezien waar onder de nummers
'Brugse Ommeland' stond. en ik was niet zat!
Bedankt voor de tip van openfietsmap hiking-layer. Dat ga ik uitproberen.
Guy Vanvuchelen
Van:
Hi,
for some time now I have been working on the wiki page to state the rules
as clearly as possible.. hope that most of the improvements are fairly
uncontroversial. Some of the changes:
* the vertical ordering established by the layer values is valid exactly only
in the point where the ways
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 11:11:35AM +, Dave F. wrote:
Hi
Prompted by the discussion on the Layer tag I've just noticed
there's two separate pages for it: 'Layer' 'Key:Layer'
What's the reason for the 'Key:' prefix? IMO it can only lead to
confusion. Haven't checked all, but Landuse
Am 09.03.2014 12:11, schrieb Dave F.:
Prompted by the discussion on the Layer tag I've just noticed
there's two separate pages for it: 'Layer' 'Key:Layer'
The page Layer is just a (wordy) disambiguation page because layer
means so many different things in OSM.
What's the reason for the
On 09/03/2014 10:30, Richard Z. wrote:
Hi,
for some time now I have been working on the wiki page to state the rules
as clearly as possible.. hope that most of the improvements are fairly
uncontroversial. Some of the changes:
* the vertical ordering established by the layer values is valid
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 11:47:32AM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 09/mar/2014 um 11:30 schrieb Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com:
* the vertical ordering established by the layer values is valid exactly
only
in the point where the ways cross or objects overlap
actually at
Am 09/mar/2014 um 12:35 schrieb Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
This is not my understanding of the layer tag. It is a tool to help renderers
place objects on top of each other has no real world implication in
differences of height.
it has implications on real world topology: it
Am 09/mar/2014 um 12:43 schrieb Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com:
It is broken by definition in at least one case: waterways ar supposed to
share a node with the dam they are crossing, which means the highway passing
across the dam will also share a node with the river passing thorugh a
On 09/03/2014 12:03, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 09/mar/2014 um 12:35 schrieb Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
This is not my understanding of the layer tag. It is a tool to help renderers place
objects on top of each other has no real world implication in differences of
height.
it has
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 01:05:18PM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 09/mar/2014 um 12:43 schrieb Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com:
It is broken by definition in at least one case: waterways ar supposed to
share a node with the dam they are crossing, which means the highway
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 11:35:20AM +, Dave F. wrote:
On 09/03/2014 10:30, Richard Z. wrote:
Hi,
for some time now I have been working on the wiki page to state the rules
as clearly as possible.. hope that most of the improvements are fairly
uncontroversial. Some of the changes:
* the
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 11:35:20AM +, Dave F. wrote:
On 09/03/2014 10:30, Richard Z. wrote:
Hi,
for some time now I have been working on the wiki page to state the rules
as clearly as possible.. hope that most of the improvements are fairly
uncontroversial. Some of the changes:
* the
On 09/03/2014 12:24, Richard Z. wrote:
it says point, not node the difference probably needs to be emphasized
very strongly. There is a difference between mathematicaly precise and
intuitive formulations:((
https://www.google.co.uk/#q=node%20definition
a point in a network or diagram at which
On 09.03.2014 13:17, Dave F. wrote:
On 09/03/2014 12:03, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
it has implications on real world topology: it says which object is
above and which below when they cross, it is not only for rendering
Disagree. A bridge at the top of Everest would be tagged 'layer=1'
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 12:34:31PM +, Dave F. wrote:
On 09/03/2014 12:24, Richard Z. wrote:
it says point, not node the difference probably needs to be emphasized
very strongly. There is a difference between mathematicaly precise and
intuitive formulations:((
On 09.03.2014 13:21, Richard Z. wrote:
the same conceptual problem exists with pylons where they are shared by two
bridges
or aerial tramways. Actualy every pylon breaks the rule by definition because
it
connects ground with layer=0 with something else at a different level.
How do you
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 12:34:31PM +, Dave F. wrote:
On 09/03/2014 12:24, Richard Z. wrote:
it says point, not node the difference probably needs to be emphasized
very strongly. There is a difference between mathematicaly precise and
intuitive formulations:((
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 02:00:36PM +0100, Tobias Knerr wrote:
On 09.03.2014 13:21, Richard Z. wrote:
the same conceptual problem exists with pylons where they are shared by two
bridges
or aerial tramways. Actualy every pylon breaks the rule by definition
because it
connects ground
Not all OSM nodes are also network/diagram nodes, which are points with
(AFAIK) three or more lines in common. Intermediate OSM nodes in the
middle of a way are not topologically significant.
On 2014-03-09 14:00, Richard Z. wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 12:34:31PM +, Dave F. wrote:
2014-03-09 13:17 GMT+01:00 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
it has implications on real world topology: it says which object is above
and which below when they cross, it is not only for rendering
Disagree. A bridge at the top of Everest would be tagged 'layer=1' exactly
as it would be if in
On 09.03.2014 14:18, Richard Z. wrote:
Pylons must share a node with the waterway bellow
in my opinion. They are a pretty relevant part of it.
Pylons will often be somewhere within the riverbank area - based on
their exact positions in reality -, but I would not insert them into the
waterway
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 04:55:51PM +0100, Tobias Knerr wrote:
On 09.03.2014 14:18, Richard Z. wrote:
Pylons must share a node with the waterway bellow
in my opinion. They are a pretty relevant part of it.
Pylons will often be somewhere within the riverbank area - based on
their exact
On 09/03/2014, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
For instance if you had an area tagged 'park' another area within it
tagged 'lake' you could add a 'layer' tag to 'lake' to ensure the render
displayed it.
-1, you should not add any layer in this case (tagging for the
On 9 March 2014 10:30, Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com wrote:
for some time now I have been working on the wiki page to state the rules
as clearly as possible.. hope that most of the improvements are fairly
uncontroversial.
Thank you for doing this, it's very useful to have this properly
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 10:26:59PM +, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
On 9 March 2014 10:30, Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com wrote:
for some time now I have been working on the wiki page to state the rules
as clearly as possible.. hope that most of the improvements are fairly
uncontroversial.
Pessoal,
Estou desenvolvendo um .BAT de compilação Garmin do mapa do Brasil e
estou tomando um erro no programa osmupdate.exe que diz que o .poly
(baixado de
http://downloads.cloudmade.com/americas/south_america/brazil/brazil.poly )
é muito grande. Pesquisando a solução eis que tenho que:
a)
Oi Thiago,
Se for o caso, oferece uma máquina com acesso remoto, muita memória e hd e
um razoável poder de processamento para você processar mais coisas...
abraços!
bráulio
2014-03-07 18:02 GMT-03:00 Thiago Marcos P. Santos tmpsan...@gmail.com:
Olá pessoal,
Consegui gerar tiles estáticos a
On 14/02/14 17:55, Fernando Trebien wrote:
Sorry for double posting, but I wanted to provide an example. These
four relations: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/20391254
If you want to comment on a ticket use the web interface - sending email
to trac@ will achieve exactly nothing as the
É bem como o John falou, não fomos nós (comunidade brasileira) que
inventamos essa distinção. Então, ao traduzir, temos que optar por não
traduzir, ou achar o nome adequado em português.
Não traduzir algo que tem equivalente brasileiro me parece desperdiçar a
oportunidade de agregar informação.
Ola gente, obrigado pelas ricas informações, vou ver se consigo fazer o
mais certo para as comunidades...Abs
Clément Vialle
(71) 9627 3415
Mestre em Engenharia Ambiental Urbana - UFBA
Consultor
em Transporte e Mobilidade Urbana
2014-02-19 16:08 GMT-03:00 talk-br-requ...@openstreetmap.org:
Para quem também tem dificuldade em representar áreas para eventos,
circos, festas e similares, é bom apoiar esta proposta:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/leisure%3Devents
Está havendo uma discussão agora nessa thread
Pessoal,
Hoje conseguimos compilar os mapas do Brasil e do RJ para Garmin em
ambiente Windows usando os dados do Projeto Openstreetmap. Também já havia
sido disponibilizado o shell script para compilação em ambiente Unix (
http://cocardl.com.br/viewtopic.php?f=23t=42).
Para este ambiente
Oi pessoal,
Uma petição para abrir a base do CEP:
https://secure.avaaz.org/en/petition/Paulo_Bernardo_Silva_presidente_dos_Correios_e_Telegrafos_Tornar_aberta_e_gratuita_a_base_de_dados_de_CEPs_do_Brasil/
Vitor
___
Talk-br mailing list
Excelente, vou divulgar nos meus círculos.
[]s
2014-03-09 22:11 GMT-03:00 Vitor George vitor.geo...@gmail.com:
Oi pessoal,
Uma petição para abrir a base do CEP:
Assinado, entretanto, acredito que a opção pelo avaaz.org não foi uma boa
ideia.
Minha avó não vai conseguir assinar esse petição :)
Em 9 de março de 2014 22:11, Vitor George vitor.geo...@gmail.com escreveu:
Oi pessoal,
Uma petição para abrir a base do CEP:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo,
Am 09.03.2014 00:18, schrieb Ralf GESELLENSETTER:
Und schließlich: 3D-Tagging ist Tagging NUR für den Renderer,
oder?
Nein. Man kann mit 3D-Daten in OSM (Anzahl Vollgeschosse, First- und
Traufhöhen usw.) mehr machen als nur 3D-Ansichten
Hallo Ralf,
Selbst tagging NUR für den Renderer wäre im Grunde doch okay.
Problematisch wird es, wenn NUR für den Renderer, aber GEGEN korrekte
Daten oder GEGEN andere Anwendungen getagged wird.
Das, wo taggen für (und natürlich insbesondere NUR für) den Renderer,
kritisiert wird, betrifft vor
Am 9. März 2014 10:45 schrieb Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de:
Hallo Ralf,
Selbst tagging NUR für den Renderer wäre im Grunde doch okay.
Problematisch wird es, wenn NUR für den Renderer, aber GEGEN korrekte
Daten oder GEGEN andere Anwendungen getagged wird.
Das, wo taggen für (und
teoricamente la limitazione è dovuta alla clausola ShareAlike (-SA) della
licenza...la licenza stessa indica che per ShareAlike non è necessario che
sia per forza una Cc, l'importante è che sia una licenza
compatibile/equivalente alla Cc+Clausole presenti. questo potrebbe andare
bene in questo
Am 09/mar/2014 um 12:00 schrieb Aury88 spacedrive...@gmail.com:
l'importante è che sia una licenza
compatibile/equivalente alla Cc+Clausole presenti. questo potrebbe andare
bene in questo caso per noi perchè la Odbl è di fatto una Cc-SA-By,
dipende del caso di utilizzo, la odbl consente
Il 08 marzo 2014 17:12, Guido Salemme ha scritto:
immaginavo :-(
però sarebbe bello fare pressioni su qualcuno per renderli compatibili
ma siamo sicuri che la qualità sia adatta? e quante ne mancano in OSM
che sono presenti in quei dati?
Secondo la Gazzetta Ufficiale le aree protette sono 871
dieterdreist wrote
Am 09/mar/2014 um 12:00 schrieb Aury88 lt;
spacedriver88@
gt;:
l'importante è che sia una licenza
compatibile/equivalente alla Cc+Clausole presenti. questo potrebbe andare
bene in questo caso per noi perchè la Odbl è di fatto una Cc-SA-By,
dipende del caso di
...qualcuno può dare un occhio in zona
...sembrerebbe che l'utente
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Simone%20Alesi
...abbia fatto un po' di confusione...forse @niubii ce ne capisce
qualcosa...
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/zona-Gran-Sasso-tp5799198.html
Sent
Aury88 wrote:
dieterdreist wrote
Am 09/mar/2014 um 12:00 schrieb Aury88 lt;
spacedriver88@
gt;:
l'importante è che sia una licenza
compatibile/equivalente alla Cc+Clausole presenti. questo potrebbe andare
bene in questo caso per noi perchè la Odbl è di fatto una Cc-SA-By,
dipende
2014-03-09 19:20 GMT+01:00 Aury88 spacedrive...@gmail.com:
senza
copiare o ricalcare potrei utilizzare questa conoscenza ,derivata dalla
visione della loro mappa, per definire il confine nord dell'area protetta
sfruttando la ortofoto PCN presente nell'editor (che posso ricalcare)?
credo
2014-03-09 19:38 GMT+01:00 scratera piz...@alice.it:
...qualcuno può dare un occhio in zona
...sembrerebbe che l'utente
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Simone%20Alesi
...abbia fatto un po' di confusione...forse @niubii ce ne capisce
qualcosa...
confermo, visto che abbiamo fatto un
...più che altro ho notato più way sovrapposte una sull'altra con diffrenti
tag...
dieterdreist wrote
2014-03-09 19:38 GMT+01:00 scratera lt;
pizpiz@
gt;:
...qualcuno può dare un occhio in zona
...sembrerebbe che l'utente
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Simone%20Alesi
...abbia fatto
Mi unisco alla discussione visto che ho segnalato io l'anomalia a Scratera.
In certi punti, come nella zona dei due Corni, si notano più way sovrapposte
(anche 4-5) mappate in modo molto approssimativo.
Per esempio: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/42.47035/13.56154
Senza contare che il
C'è qualcuno che si offre a scrivere una mail gentile all'utente per
segnalarlo i problemi e per offrire aiuto? Se fosse di zona, ancora meglio.
ciao,
Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
dieterdreist wrote
C'è qualcuno che si offre a scrivere una mail gentile all'utente per
segnalarlo i problemi e per offrire aiuto? Se fosse di zona, ancora
meglio.
ciao,
Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@
Scusate ma la maggior parte sono highway=footway. È corretto? :-/
Il 09/03/2014 22:32, Pier88 ha scritto:
dieterdreist wrote
C'è qualcuno che si offre a scrivere una mail gentile all'utente per
segnalarlo i problemi e per offrire aiuto? Se fosse di zona, ancora
meglio.
ciao,
Martin
Ciao a tutti,
recentemente su Hangout si è discusso dei civici di Rimini e Pavia, che
sono rilasciati come Opendata. Io li avrei pronti a breve e taggati
correttamente, se nessuno si offre interessato o ha qualche obiezione
provvederei a caricarli, avvisando prima il DWG tramite una mail.
2014-03-10 0:06 GMT+01:00 Leonardo kinetocor...@gmail.com:
Io li avrei pronti a breve e taggati correttamente, se nessuno si offre
interessato o ha qualche obiezione provvederei a caricarli, avvisando prima
il DWG tramite una mail. Ovviamente verranno integrati con i (pochi) dati
già presenti,
Ciao a tutti!
Per mappare una stazione meteorologica c'è il tag:
man_made=monitoring_station
ma se questa si trova posizionata in cima ad un palo molto alto che sarebbe
man_made=tower
come si tagga?
Grazie.
--enrico
--
View this message in context:
Grazie degli input Simone, ho una mezza idea per farlo. Al massimo
chiedo qui in lista ai nostri maghi dello script!
Leonardo
Il 10/03/2014 00:12, Simone Cortesi ha scritto:
2014-03-10 0:06 GMT+01:00 Leonardo kinetocor...@gmail.com:
Io li avrei pronti a breve e taggati correttamente, se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kust saab neid andmeid leida? Ma vaatasin maaamet.ee, aga sealt ma ei
leidnud midagi. Aga siit ma leidsin nimekirju:
https://teeregister.riik.ee/mnt/index/net.do?netSelection=KOH
Õige vaatlus et Keila vallas nimed puuduvad... Mis need teenumbrid on?
He estat mirant la wiki de l'OSM per veure mètodes més ràpids per
enregistrar POIs. He vist que una manera més lleugera seria mitjançant el
registre de waypoints i l'edició de tags posteriorment. No sé molt bé si fa
falta un aparell GPS o amb un smartphone faria el pes. Estic interesat en
guardar
Hey all,
Quick question regarding tagging buildings. I've come across several that
are owned and maintained by a local telecom company. These are buildings,
usually located in residential areas, look somewhat like houses, but are
there to provide switching and distribution of communications
Ahoj,
už před nějakou dobou jsem objevil
http://www.geoportalpraha.cz/cs/vydej-a-prijem
lépe pak
http://www.geoportalpraha.cz/uploads/assets/stranky/vydej-prijem/Cenik_URM.pdf
, strana 2
a nakonec jsem se rozhodl podělit se, protože toto mi fakt hlava nebere.
Data jsou poskytována zdarma,
No, zní to jako téma pro OSGeo.cz, přeposílám v kopii na Honzu Cibulku, který
má z nás asi největší zkušenosti - (s obojím, tedy jak s vymáháním dat, tak s
případným zostuzováním).
IMHO, jedná se o úřední dílo, z principu je poznámka o zabezpečení proti
zneužití naprosto irelevatní.
Jáchym
On
Díky, to je super, že je tu někdo zkušený.
Oni to řeší smluvní pokutou - pokud bych data zneužil či nezabezpečil či
předal dál, měl bych platit smluvní pokutu ve výši stonásobku manipulačního
poplatku, proti čemuž by se následně asi bránit dalo, ale s pochybným
výsledkem a natolik OSM zase
Cus,
pokud jde o uredni dilo ... jako ze tomu vse nasvedcuje, tak jsou
nesmyslny i ty manipulacni poplatky. Nebot vypaleni/ulozeni dat v
digitalni podobne na nejake medium jiste nestoji desitky tisic.
IMO typicky priklad jak vyjebavat se 106tkou.
Jinak mozna hint ... tyhle piratsky akce radi
Ahoj,
Dne Ne 9. března 2014 11:49:31, jzvc napsal(a):
Cus,
pokud jde o uredni dilo ... jako ze tomu vse nasvedcuje, tak jsou
nesmyslny i ty manipulacni poplatky. Nebot vypaleni/ulozeni dat v
digitalni podobne na nejake medium jiste nestoji desitky tisic.
IMO typicky priklad jak vyjebavat
Takže ve zkratce: OTM běží ze setrvačnosti, nikdo se o to pravděpodobně
nestará a asi to ani nikdo nepoužívá.
Marián
Dne 8.3.2014 09:45, Petr Vejsada napsal:
Ahoj,
kdysi jsem si stáhl ze svn na doméně no-ip.org xml styly pro Mapnik a z
těch
vychází vlastně ta moje mapa. Bylo to pro Mapnik
Data jsou poskytována zdarma, platí se pouze manipulační poplatek za jejich
výdej. Jeden by si řekl, že je to pochopitelné, že DVD něco stojí a práce s
tím je, ale už je méně pochopitelné, že data musím následně zabezpečit proti
zneužití - ??? co to sakra má být? - a nesmím je poskytovat dál.
Ahoj,
co tedy vlastně jsou geodata? Může to být databáze či kartografické dílo (podle
AZ)? Kartografické dílo asi ne; pod tím si představuji mapu vnímatelnou smysly,
obvykle zrakem, případně hmatem, interaktivní mapa třeba i zvuková, ale
samotná data asi ne.
A co je vlastně ten rejstřík?
Dne 9.3.2014 12:09, Petr Vejsada napsal(a):
Ahoj,
Dne Ne 9. března 2014 11:49:31, jzvc napsal(a):
Cus,
pokud jde o uredni dilo ... jako ze tomu vse nasvedcuje, tak jsou
nesmyslny i ty manipulacni poplatky. Nebot vypaleni/ulozeni dat v
digitalni podobne na nejake medium jiste nestoji desitky
野方です。
2014年3月9日 11:58 yuu hayashi hayashi@gmail.com:
林です。
わたしは barrier=city_wall としています。
現地調査で高さや材質がわかれば追記しています。
積み方などはdesctioptionに書いてます。
barrier=city_wallですか。それもちょっと考えました。
高さや材質は、まだ書いてませんがそれも書けますよね。
積み方は、descriptionですか。そこまでは考えてなかったですね。参考になります。
barrier=city_wall は、 area=yes
野方です。
そういえば、神社やお寺をエリアで書いてノードを置く人もいますが、
これも警告で引っかかりますね。
2014年3月8日 22:01 Jun NOGATA noga...@gmail.com:
野方です。
東さん、飯田さんありがとうございます。
たしかに東さんのおっしゃる原則は分かっていたのですが…
2014年3月8日 18:16 Satoshi IIDA nyamp...@gmail.com:
いちおうの指針として、こんなかんじのものがありました。
(こちらはAreaとして描いています)
Martijn, the bad versions of the relation pages are back from the beginning of
February. :(
From: m...@rtijn.org
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 21:55:37 -0800
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] maproulette.org
Hi all,
I fixed the relation pages problem. It turns out that
由於活動細節一直到最近才能確定
剩下的活動籌畫被壓縮
加上本人太忙一直沒時間好好弄
宣傳上也來不及
原訂的3/15 mapping party取消
關度、竹圍一帶是好地方
查資料時發現挺多好玩有趣的東西
Dennis
2014-01-22 1:46 GMT+08:00 Dennis Raylin Chen b92612...@gmail.com:
各位好
好久沒辦mapping party了
先前在OSM台北月聚，跟egret討論過年後該來辦mapping party，覺得時間上來說過年後會適合
而跟我比較熟的上官聊了後，權橫我們三人的時間，只有3/15可以
謝謝瑞霖說明
抱歉我也是事情炸開，原本3/15的party也要主辦
結果後來國中同學的婚禮這天要去，人整天不在台北...
之後我再跟瑞霖確認地方和做宣傳分工
上官
Dennis Raylin Chen b92612...@gmail.com 於 2014年3月9日 下午11:05 寫道：
由於活動細節一直到最近才能確定
剩下的活動籌畫被壓縮
加上本人太忙一直沒時間好好弄
宣傳上也來不及
原訂的3/15 mapping party取消
關度、竹圍一帶是好地方
查資料時發現挺多好玩有趣的東西
Dennis
2014-01-22 1:46
75 matches
Mail list logo
